#community-update-classes
1 messages · Page 13 of 1
i just think bros taking his view points and trying to make everyone believe his view point is that of the whole community
as that what it sounds like
Manipulation technique of claiming that youre right and truthful
Classy
And then pressing it onto others
Whats next
I dont think im right in regards anything we have spoken about balance or class wise. but I am 100% correct in explaining your behavior
best not say me
average subreddit person rn, it's painful to deal with
Okay can you ping me where i had a viewpoint of making battlefield an overly complex mechanical shooter
innit
Keep telling yourself that
Jesus dude
go back to bed before you get rolled up in this
I dont need to, you proved me right
i probably could but i aint gonna cos this is between you and bsod. im just sat here thinking your viewpoints on whether or not someone who uses/doesnt use a certain mechanic is a bad player
Florp
hamptor
but i just got up 
having all the "movement tech" in a game is whatever idgaf
Im not superior, just correct on how you behave
for your own sanity
You cant
Lol
i probably could if i could be arsed to go back and read all the brain rot from both sides
people can have a lil "movement tech" if i get manual leaning. Fair trade
but i aint got the mental energy for that
Can we now like pinpoint this or are you gonna go off topic and talk about something entirely different to avoid original argument
manual leaning was good
You cant
i liked it on bf5
Not a complex movement mechanic
youre actually so self centered its crazy
Game design wise, manually leaning is a complex as it gets.
Next
people like you is why we get shit games i swear
Bf1 was shit i didnt ask for that and bf5 wouldve been good if it wasnt bad at everything else
Next
it's a nice movement option for a more methodical player. It's nice to have different options for different ppl
battlefield 1 is argueably the best game in the franchise
and NOT just it looked good
Best if you ask the casual (Majority) player. Worst if you ask the sweats.
Combat rolling, etc.
this
and battlefield isnt meant to catter to the sweats
since not everyone is a sweat
Tell me 1 thing that was actually good in bf1
vast majority is a casual
It works best when it caters to both IMO tho
Yeah asking clueless players that dont know whats cancer and what isnt is brilliant
You're right worst game ever
To a degree. Im not talking BO6 movement and speed, but a middle cround between BF1 and BFV
A good game is one that is open ended towards everyone not appealing to everyone.
Which is kind of ironic.
visuals, audio design, the attention to detail, lore, over all game play, mechanics (of how the game actually functioned), music, setting
class setup
Bf1 had fun semis.
youre just hating cos you couldnt "slide" or abuse things like air strafing
I liked seeing semis as a main weapon.
Though the game has its own issues with shit like suppression etc.
Watch how this will be spun.
yeah they did a good job of making sure movement was for everyone
We can clearly see that in afghanistan milsim games in portal
Visuals visuals visuals, the mechanics being sweetspot, suppression, visual recoil werent mechanically good, tanks being able to repair inside tanks made them pretty broken
Then threw all of that in the bin for 2042
Grenades recharged too fast
Yeah, bf 1 required some skill with recoil and stuff too so he doesn't like it
Majority of the maps were dogshit visuals aside
I am not an avid bf1 fan, I have my fair bit of issues with the game. But I dunno. It doesnt live rent free in my head.
That's a good description of what I want
tanks are broken in any battlefield lmfao
No
it's why i can't get into bf2042
and youre saying "visuals visuals visuals" like thats all i said
Bf4 was actually air vehicles dominating
I gave up with i pickle you days ago
vehicles as whole in bf4 were insanely overtuned
Instant turret turning on bf4 was comical
LMAO
Thats 50% of what you said and the rest of the 50% was good mechanics which makes the gameplay which is pretty horrid and frankly boring, then audio which was good yes and then more visuals
youre actually delusional
i said visuals once
are you gonna say because i said "setting" i meant visuals?
you are arent you
the speed of the tanks, while realistic, made them very difficult to escape from as infantry if they chased you
visuals , audio design, the attention to detail (visuals again) , lore (?), over all game play, mechanics (of how the game actually functioned), music, setting (visuals again)
Piloting mechs has fucked up tanking for me.
BF1 and BFV tank internal repairs should have melded into something better for the next game. But 2042 was just a mess.
I liked the need to carry a repair tool to be able to repair a tank, with the limited crawl speed when performing an internal repair in BFV. Paired with it taking time at this crawl speed to perform a repair.
I do not like 2042s single button press auto repair system.
I love being able to zoom forwards and backwards but being unable to turn hurts.
the atmosphere of bf1 was insanely good and the setting being WWI was a fun concept since its always WWII
But it does happen with treads.
Atmosphere is part of why bf1 looked the way it did
Dumbnuts
you dont say lol
although I do still hope the internal repair idea stays. I know some people want repairs to only come from the torch, but the second you get out of that thing to repair it will be stolen instantly which I do not look forward to
Most of people hating on bf 1 are those who liked bf 42 because it's way easier to play. The same ones who cheer here everyday for the locked classes system and the sliding.
atmosphere means more than just visuals you clown xD
Its quite literally a visual aspect of the game
Audio too
and you mentioned this earlier calling it "camperfield" when talking about bf1
isnt that ALL battlefields
you get campers in every fucking battlefield
Visuals audio gameplay everything.
How the guns look, how the maps look, how the soldiers look, the smokes the fire and whatnot
The BFV repair system was like using the torch internally...but it was time limited (Took time to repair in bits) and had risk/reward (As you couldnt move effectively when repairing).
IMO its the perfect system for internal repairs
Thats mostly just visuals
Its an arcade shooter it really doesnt give you a realistic tone for ww1 warfare so its not atmospheric in gameplay sense
No
this is again all battlefields
Because in other battlefield games you had movement to actually react to campers, manuver closer to those said campers, rotate away from those said campers
dont tell him you'll ruin his world
Just say "I couldn't aim for shit on bf 1"
only lists the visual elements of atmosphere
Mechwarrior could be considered atmospheric piloting a 30 metre tall mech blasting clanners with gauss rifles.
bro not every thing is about your fucking shitty movement tech
Or piloting a king crab with a pair of 200MM cannons.
Its their entire personality, dont you know /s
jesus christ its like im talking to a cod apologist
eh i rarely had problems with campers in bf1 on xbox, or in any bf game
well done you have a tracker
No ones asking for cod movement dont be delusional
gg
bro youre linking EVERYTHING to movement
Yeah he never mentioned movement what
it sounds like what cod players do
Because movement is a big part of battlefield
Battlefield 1 is the only battlefield game without movement mechanics
because it didnt need it
18 hours of gameplay lol
Ok
Aside from stoneage battlefield games
bro
Why did you link an account with terrible stats...as proof of not being bad at BF1?
if you think a battlefield game is bad cos it has no movement mechanics
BF "mooovement" nerds love to insist that BF movement is entirely different than CoD movement
No people didnt want it because they were crying over it
then youve been living on a crutch
So they removed the lovement
because it wasnt needed
I like good movement but jesus christ lol
if people are complaining about it then IT WASNT NEEDED/WANTED
people will complain if they dont want/like smth
What terrible stats lol
thats simple to understand surely
battlefield 1 isnt a bad game cos it doesnt have all the fancy movement tech
Highest kills is 557 with the best auto in the game lol. Awful stats
Lowkey people will complain no matter what, like a certain vegetable is doing now
if you decide what a good game is based on what sort of movement tech it has then im worried for you
and i hope they dont listen to people like you
Literally proving the point of the thing you replied to > "Couldnt aim for shit in BF1"
otherwise battlefield will turn into a game like cod dominated by freaks who are snorting gfuel while they spam slide cancels and dolphin dives
the account you posted highest kill weapon is 557 kills with the MP18 trench
battlefield 1 was simple in terms of mechanics because it didnt need them to be a good game
Youre butthurt that i played mp18 which is slower in ttk than automatico and anni?
And only got 500 kils lol
And?
I'm praying to God that DICE has hardened their hearts to the vocal minority 🙏
i mean the fact youve barely played bf1 should remove your opinion honestly
And 500 kills is supposed to prove you are able to aim...how?
like
I have aprox 2k hours on it
Bf1 annoys me more because of its cheap mechanics and the beginning of the end of the playerbase cognitive decline but I dunno. If people enjoy i dont give a fuck.
Then give us the full stats?
I can get another 10k kills lol
It wont change
"I could get 10k more, I just didnt want to"
I only used snipers in bf 1 never touched any other weapon and I have 905 flag captures
? I have 4kpm on that weapon what are you waffling about
yes you can have this view but are you gonna say its a shit game?
I can get 10k more
the cognitive decline benefits me since i can be a good player without having to tryhard, such things are impossible in CoD 
dont mean this in an attacking way btw
I would say where I am coming from without being a dick but not right now.
just wanna know
Np
yhyh thats fair, you can dm it me if you want
look at my xbox bf1 stats for Postaltariat 
Your flag captures suck bro I told you last week switch to cod
i thought bf1 was shit bro
Ill even play a different weapon
why you playing a shit game
Is there really anything else to play lol
bf4
2k hours, 83 flags capped. Also wow
a game with good movement
I also think youre lying about 2k hours
Play ultrakill
Cos your account playtime per class/vehicle says otherwise
I have 3 accounts
He has circa 20
it's because moovement is so slow it took him 3 hours to get to the next objective💔🥀
Genuinely. If you are tired with multiplayer shooters then stop playing them?
Of course you do
I can send you ingame hours its not that deep it doesnt matter
Why did you post the only account with like...22 hours then. where are the others
Im banned on others so i dont even play on them
omg lol
bro probably was toxic in vc
No
So if you werent banned on 3 accounts for being toxic....
X
I never even use ingame chat
Post the stats of a banned account, I want to see something
Bftracker doesnt calculate kpms correctly for some reason aswell
I can prove that aswell
Wait, you posted the others in stats in the past. Let me check myself
Yes brainlet they have worse statistics because they are old accounts played on bad pcs
Surprise surprise
i kinda think pickle is a next level troll, or just gets off on arguing
I_Pickle_You, Dreigo_Tend are the others

When i started playing bf1 i had a intel 5550 something and a rx560 with 8gb ddr3 ram
On a 15 euro mouse
If you didnt aim to be a dick a lot of this fluff could have been cut out.
Im not aiming to be a dick lol
I can see the chat still hasn’t touched grass. Imma post the sunrise for yall
They called out skill issue which doesnt exist and now bsod is hyperfixated on trying to make me look like a bad player
4kpm and 4kd average is bad now 🥀
Why post some irrelevant account with 20 hours...your other accounts have much better stats.
You have an impressively low HS %
How is that irrelevant when its my current account that im currently playing on has my current stats
Yes, claiming 2k hours, then posting an account with only 500 kills on the best auto in the game will make you look like a bad player
It isnt even the best
Anni and automatico kill faster than mp18
I also dont see how 500 kills is your main issue here
Why does it matter lol
Kills is just a matter of time tbh
Like sorry that i held a consistent what 4.1-4.3kpm on a mp18 gun for 500 kills?
Do i need to get it to 5kpm at 10k kills for you to be happy?
If you cant see how that would matter...I dont know what to say. The things you present for us to know were
- I have 2k hours
- My account (Which is all you shared) shows max kills of 500+
?
witht hat info, you look like a bad player
Im not
You shared thi like 10 mins after the original conversations
I quite literally do not exist in your brain and know that
self promotion damn
Claymore
i think claymores were fun on metro
It isnt even self promotion they can literally watch me play the game
getting those random ahh kills
yhh
and ngl
you "being banned for being too good"
thats what they always say huh
👀
does my counter strike nose sniff some gear
You can watch my videos if you want to find cheating dont care
id rather not watch a video of you playing games bro
Then dont throw out random garbage
Im sure he plays like its cod
isnt that what youve been doing this whole time lil bro?
🦧
but ill let you do you
You couldnt point me to it anyway
“Pickle said that battlefield should have overly complex movement and become movement biased and make the game harder for bad players” 🤓 ☝️
i for one never said this
soooooo
yh
👍
You agreed to bsod when he said that i did
Lol
And bsod said that im trying to make the game harder for casuals
Like yesterday i think
Which is just (lol)
I also never said you said that, I used it as an example fo how you approach arguements/disagreements. I even said this 2 messages after, when you stated I quoted you verbatim
me thinking someone has a somewhat reasonable/agreeable statement is very different from me saying it myself
i think you care too much about movement mechanics
thats what i have said
Proven wrong once
Also not what I said.
I said you want to make it harder for casual players you face. Which is true
@shy slate literally what you said
Proven wrong twice
Context matters
“Youre trying to make the game harder for them, they dont care about what the game is at all, they just want casual fun”
In recent years, probably a good 5 years or so more and more gamers have started complaining about "cracked" movement in games. It's really why the arena shooter industry is impossible for new devs to get into
Corrected what
Read?
me casually sitting here thinking counter strike has the best movement system of any fps
"I dont want my ability to stomp n00bs reduced" this is your correction?
To you saying “Youre trying to make the game harder for them, they dont care about what the game is at all, they just want casual fun”
Okayers
Lol
That is what I was inferring, when it comes to you
How is that a correction
I said it after the original statement, apologies for not referencing past works
Yes, others that YOU face
Are you actually this dence?
Hey guys, guess what he is doing again tho
xdd
Are you gonna spam strawman argument to your strawman argument again
Im bad at the game gang theres no way that i could make the game harder for them
If only i had achieved 8kpm
The statement I made, related to your skill (I have already said this BTW)...was in relation to the information you gave us. You said you have 2k hours, but then shared an account with only 500 kill on your best weapon.
With only that information available to me (and anyone else) its easy to come to the conclusion that said player is not good.
My main account is literally my discord nickname dimbwit
Its not hidden info
Then...why didnt you share that one?
My main account is also on my youtube channel
You have every access to my main account
You shared it as reference to your skill level...but somehow im the dimbwit?
Because its my current skill level with my current statistics
On an account that i currently play on
So next time you share it...give context to the account age/play time. dont just say you have 2k hours
I only play on my main account if i want to play with friends or if i want to make a video on something
Why does it matter lol
youtuber detected, opinion now irrelevant
Videos on how to chicken run and slide without capturing flags
You can watch them they are on battleifeld 1 where im constantly either clearing the objectives or attacking/defending them
Lets stop making braindead statements
I even allow you to point out times where you think i didnt play for the objective which i can then explain to you on what i was actually doing so you might improve yourself
But thats probably something that didnt happen
"so you might improve yourself" 🤓
Standing on a cleared objective with my 15 other teammates is such a genius move
What an intelligent form of gameplay that sure is
Looks like its over for me
🙁
@shy slate youre bsod_gaming?
Indeed I am
My girlfriend whos first pc game was 2042 plays 2042 better than you
Nice, tell her GG from me
Crazy
Isnt it!
42h on bf5 127h on bf1
Sounds about right
500 on 2042
they're always silent when you ask them stuff like this
1k hours sorry
real
Literally public info
Guy said skill issue i sent him my current account with my recent games sub 4kpm, 4kd
Guy said i want hours my youtube is linked my nickname is literally my main account
Everythings there
Its not a murder mystery
KD or SPM means anything to me. (Not that I dont understand them, I just dont call a high SPM player good by default)
Same
Lol
I sure suck at this game gang
0 wins, agree
I switch to weaker teams
Lol
So it wont be a complete stomp every game
The account i sent has 64% winratio on community servers where balance is often manipulated
Thats without winswitching/loseswitching
My main account where i switch to losing sides has 48% winratio
I sure must be bad that i couldnt carry a bad team all alone in a 32v32 game
Youre only good at the game if you win 90% of the games
😔
Dont care
Pick 1
Is kdr the most important achievement?
No
Why you always talk about it then
Because you literally said “skill issue” so i posted you my stats to prove you wrong
Sub 4kpm is top 100 region playerlevel
Meaning im better than 99.9% of players in that game roughly
Because i dont need to stay on already cleared objectives
Its meaningless
Or cap them, apparently
Teammates are capping them
Theres no enemies on the flag, theres no enemies near the flag
So kills ARE the most important thing to you
Kills are the entire point of the game

kills are the point in TDM
You gain map control by killing people
nope
You quite literally gain tickets by killing people
If I had a coin for every flag I took without killing anybody sneaking in
Kills leading to objective caps, sure. But such low caps are abnormal
you can be at the top of a leaderboard with 0 kills and by capping every objective
and win the game like that
I doubt you have a very high success rate of that
You gain more by capping a flag
?
I just dont stay on the cap
Like for what purpose do i need to be there
Cap the flag faster
For what
winning the game?
To gain flags, flag majority faster
I am winning the games i have 64% winratio
In bf1 since you dont really play it generally you get more points through kills than through flags
Both sides are corrct there tho. So its doesnt really matter
Its usually 500-600 kills per team and ~400 points through captured flags
Na, not really the case for me at least. Or in the last/current BF.
Since each flag cap is -10 tickets for the opponent
by not making myself useless and sticking on an objective which already captures decently fast with 3-4 players is already empty and set in stone i can aid the rest of the 28 players of my team
Me capping a flag is worth 10 kills
Btw the enemy cant gain points from neutralized flags
*10 confirmed kills
Lol and how many flags do you capture per minute, who cleared those flags for you
They can from capping a neutral flag, especially since the time from neutral to friendly, is far faster than from owned to neutral
if youre not on a contested flag because you go off chasing kills
So if you leave a flag neutral, and an enemy caps it...youve just lost your team 10 tickets
then thats 1 less person on the point which gives enemy team the advantage
chasing kills doesnt work in conquest lil bro
At the end of the day its meaningless, worse players can finish capping ill push to the next flag while enemies team is weaker after fighting and losing defense i win us the next flag and i win
you can drop 900 kills in a game, doesnt matter if you lose
you aint doing anything to win the game by kill greeding
You can watch my gameplay videos im constantly on or near flags
you have a 64% WR or whatever it was cos your team is clearly capping points for you
Its more like you can get 50 kills, but if your actions allowed the other team to cap 6 times, your contribution has partially been nullified
bro stop telling people to watch your gameplay
nobody wants to watch your clips
nobody is arsed about your videos
your way of thinking is so fucking backwards its insane
again
nobody
cares
no, because the way youre talking, its reasonable to assume you chase kills
Like I said, both sides are partially right. Enders covered this at length several times related to how he plays. If you mop up the players attacking the bounds of a flag, it makes it easier other for players to cap
At the same time, the flag caps themselves are very important to secure.
idgaf about what videos of your games show
your words
imply you dont play the obj, or once its clear you run off after more kills
but
the argument being made is youre not getting captures
nope
im using your words
.
no enemies on the flag? you go to where the enemies are
but while youre running to the next one
the enemies are back at that flag
lmfao youre choosing to misunderstand my words
thats funny
clearly youre proving it rn xd
Ngl there are multiple creators out there that have proven that kills are just as if not more important than simply just sitting on OBJ lol. Getting kills while clearing and capturing an OBJ is very important. But once it is capped, it is much more beneficial to farm kills while going to another obj. Then clear obj, capture, farm kills rinse and repeat lol
Yeah no it’s definitely not lol. I have played with my Squad hundreds of times and we have single handedly won the game by farming kills and moving point to point lol
Sitting on an already capped obj and not getting any kills or moving to cap another point and following the momentum loses games. Can’t tell you how many times I’ve been in games where half the team sits on the same flag while the other teams farms kills and gets momentum to all the other points
Different strokes for different folks
yh thats all well and good but just to clarify, i never personally said already fully capped objs
yk
my main point was contested ones
i just worded it wrong
Yeah I’m coming in without full context, just giving my two cents lol
thats fair lmfao
im cheeks at explaining my thoughts, part of being one with the tism
I will say tho the way I play is the most stressful and definitely wears me out mentally after an hour lmao. Farming 70+ kills and getting like 10-14 OBJs makes my brain hurt lmao
oh yh 100%
plus my viewpoint is mainly coming from an operations/breakthrough player
since thats what i play primarily
i think its more fun
Has the discussion finally finished
It’s over Anakin
Lmfao that game has the same chance of happening as Titanfall 3
When I’m in a madness competition and my opponent is anyone in a franchise that wants a third game
ffs
Lmfao
Anyways, been listening to the bf1 ost while watching these discussions fly by and it’s rather apt
It was playing on the radio the other day actually which was hype
The one thing I really want back are the somber tracks that play in the spawn screen
I want Hans Zimmer to make the entire score
He’s my goat tbh lol. That man has cooked up some of the best soundtracks ever
he is good
65daysofstatic have done some pieces that sound very bf4 like
Haven’t heard of them before but I’ll check em out
They did no mans sky. But they’ve got a lot of that really grindy electronic static stuff that bf4 has
With a bit of rock it feels
mr bone's wild ride never ends
we'll be here till we die

Solar Fields should compose BF||2143|| imo. Mirror's Edge Catalyst soundtrack was so good.
Solar fields is fantastic as well. Also agree with mirrors edge
Damn I miss those games, wish I could wipe them from memory but ive played them like 4 times over lol
Technical Question:
Will it support 32-bit BF6 audio quality or will it be limited to the 24-bit standard?
Surely you know no one can/will answer this
whatever it's like in 2042 now
Wont talk to uneducated people > keeps asking questions they know devs wont answer, or will make people violate their NDA if answered



😘
Tbf they can’t tell you even if they were doing it
xD
Technical question: does everyone love the unrestricted weapon classes???
Eh

the thing they're calling "signature weapons" didn't work in 2042 and it won't work now
Yeah why would they iterate on a game that isn’t rly considered to be battlefield lol
mixed. After dwelling on it more i'm inbetween
If signature weapons are gonna exist as a fun way to min max a lil bit, then they need more perks. Not necessarily better perks, but more so you have a bunch of lil bonuses across the board
I'm pro unlocked guns, but I think providing incentives to use certain types is fine. I'd like it if the different subclasses or whatever they are called have different ones too
How do you know that though. The main reason it didnt work is there wasnt really any classes.
2042 has classes and signature weapons, it doen't work
BFV was supposed to have dragging and it "didn't work"
Dragging was never put into the game unlike classes and signature weapons
That just means it "didn't work" even more 
It doesnt work becuase the game is bad
Gunplay isn't an issue in 2042 tbh, it's an issue in BF6(at least for now)
You gotta be delusional
The gunplay IS indeed an issue
The fact that you can cross map people easily
Lack of bloom
💀
It ''was'' an issue, it ''is'' not an issue now
Ehhh
2042's gunplay feels like cardboard soaked in milk. Doesn't make sense? Yea, neither does that game
I don’t have much experience soaking cardboard in milk
Imo a lack of bloom/spread is a severe issue in a lot of recent fps games
Yeah
Im not a fan
I’d rather have pattern recoil like CS over random spread….although, now that I think about it weapon balance goes out the window if enough people learn a weapon’s recoil and can laser beam across the map. More bloom/random spread would force weapons into their proper engagement distances 🤔
People complaining about unlocked weapons are ridiculous, and obviously don’t play the the game
I want locked weapons. Enjoyed it in BF1
Bf1 99% of people just played assault
Also don’t like recon and the spawn beacon being hamstrunged by being forced to camp with a sniper like a loser
I think 99% of people are going to play “assault” regardless. Meds + AR. Meta
It’ll force more gun variety in matches
Unless everyone just is selfish and picks a single class
No because everyone will just choose assault to use the assault rifles
Just like bf4 just like bf3 just like bf1
Cap
unless you were on a black hole of a team, which at that point it’s GG
If you weren’t playing assault you were playing engineer using a carbine which are basically assault rifles which doesn’t solve the problem
If anything no class locked guns is good, it makes it impossible for people to pick a class for a gun and now only for the gadgets
Truth be told, neither way is going to convince the player base to play as a team. Those days are long gone. Everyone just wants to be an Enders 2.0 and farm kills with their ARs and stims and play Locker 24-7
It incentives using the class you want now
No more having assault rifle which is the best gun class in assault anymore
So people stop majority using assualt and its more spread
True
It makes no difference really
There’s a problem behind that tho: “I don’t wanna use this class that’ll help my team rn cuz my fav gun is over here”. I mean, is someone like that really gonna give af what’s going on in the first place? Prob not imo
Nobody played as a team most of the time anyways tho
They didn't in 2042 either
Yeah, that’s the point nobody ever plays as a team in these games unless they are with their friends
Locking weapons to classes won’t fix that it’s just how the game is
Unlocking it won't either lol
another video proofing, that people use a wide variety of weapons in 2042, not "just the same AR" as people claim
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ncIygIOMhAk
Ok, but unlocking them means more people will play different classes meaning you atleast have a higher chance of getting ammo or health
No it won't lol people will just choose the one class that benefits them most
And their favourite gun
That's how players play the game yes.
They will main their most favoured class and weapon.
Lots like medic, lots like assault.
Exactly
Ok bro hating on someone just bc they are good at the game ain’t helping your argument here
Wdym hating lmao
dude, even back in BC2 when we played on xbox 360, we would play on 24/7 arica harbor CQ server
this ain't nothing new, infantry only modes / maps have always been the most popular.
hell even in BF2, the most popular was strike at karkand. with only 1 LAV + 1 MBT
This is what I mean
Just because someone is good at playing infantry doesn’t mean they are invalid
I just want the game to work at launch
And have more then 5 maps and guns at launch
2 gun. One map
And a buggy
Oh and if you pre order you get early access to a unfinished build and a free skin for the tank coming in season 4
(Its common rarity and can be earned ingame a week later by anyone)
I think the classes should be as follows. Assault should be the medic, that is, healer. Suppliers for ammunition, pioneer anti tank, sniper of the reconnaissance. So just the class system of bf3.
What
I feel like assault medic support and scout is generally imo the most logical class choices, I dont think engineer needs to really exist, however if you did have assault be a medic idk what else you'd fill the gap with
Also dice is being rlly quiet about this entire thing
I wonder if they are waiting till june
Well later june* to talk about it or not
They are quiet about everything, because the announcement is soonTM
I love that this vids creator is trying their best to prove eclipses video false...but actually ends up proving them correct...then being in full on denial of the fact.
what was eclipses vid about, i don't watch bf youtubers
It was a test to see if BF players in an unlocked weapon system will actually "Only use 1 or 2 of the best weapons, and nothing else" as many people claim.
the result was that no...players use an extremely diverse set of weapons, with no clear meta.
yeah, he doesn't make any sense. 
Even tho their video is a terrible way to repeat eclipses tests...as they are clearly a mega sweat, and only count weapons that killed them (Ecpilse counted all kills in every game from every player)...its still hilarious that both videos have the same conclusion
The best SMG in the game (the AC9) didnt even kill them 1 time. Which further disproves the "Only meta guns will be used" claim
The one counter argument people will have is "everyone will use the new gun from the battlepass for a while" but that will happen regardless lol
it's funny tho, that he came to the conclusion, that the weapons he got killed more, are also better weapons than the ones he got killed less.
even tho the ACR & RM68 are light years better than the M416. which got him killed way more than the "meta" weapons 
Yeah, and thats supposed to happen...its what most devs want, and why they usually make the new weapons OP at their release
Americans love the M4 what can I say
yeah, imagine if we had class locked weapons, when the RM68 & VHX came out.
nobody would've played any other class than assault for 3 months straight
"why does nobody revive me??? DICE is incompetent smh"
I think a lot of people will still play a class they like to play. Even in BF3 (SCAR or M16A3) and BF4 (ACE23) where there were CLEAR superior weapons on other classes...I still preferred to play support or Engineer.
Someone on the subreddit pointed out that regardless of the gameplay benefits, this system is also done for the live service so that every class will always have something to enjoy. It's good for player retention. BFV didn't have many seasons, but in a couple seasons certain classes got absolutely nothing. That's 3 months without anything new + the time it takes to grind the next pass to get something
lol, yeah the medic got nothing for like 5 months...after content did actually start releasing
i remember that VERY well as I only used Medic
I still dont mind what they decide on tho. Locked or unlocked is all good with me
i think its a good idea that i somehow had this channel hidden 
But dont you love to have the same discussion 25 times a day?
It's about time they archive it tbh
I love how it’s the only one that’s needed a full channel made because people had so much to say about it
There was something always going on!
Ehhhh I think they've got something planned and then they will close it.
probably i'd be shocked if they didn't bring it up at all
i'd argue it's more beneficial for them to not bring it up. The "veterans" will be mad about anything DICE does if it's not 100% giving into their demands
uh huh,
it will be more difficult for them to riot if they are not given any ammunition
lmao what
Yeah clearly people who played BF before 2042 don't play the game 😂
kinda what i mean by how this is basically just politics for gamer gremlins, both sides have said some of the most braindead shit ive seen
Wide variety of same 3-4 meta weapons, even he says in the video he will never die to a P90, he will die to K30 or M5A3 or AK5C
but also both make okay points at times too
im referencing the msg ur replying to*
it has to be bait
what do i need to elaborate on
Can tell you didn't watch the video.
It's actually insane the lengths some will go to to try favor data to their cause. This CC did a test that's basically "These are the weapons that only killed me" (They are an ultra sweat) and still their result shows massive weapon variety
The SFAR killed them most and not a single person will tell you it's a meta weapon.
Delete DMR's Please....either u are a Sniper or not...this trash DMR do too much DMG....
They schould get a massive Nerf or completely deleted
i haven't watched it so i cant speak on results but doing tests like this is pretty difficult unfortunately due to how gathering data is reccomended to be handled
The tests themselves are easy to do.
you need a control variable and thats what i mean by doing a control variable would be difficult for either side of the argument
You don't need a control for such a test.
Just a large enough set of data. That being player kills in live games.
it makes results more certain with a control is my point
like i said i haven't seen it yet and im saying this for either side
What could your control even be for a test that is looking to see what weapons players use, and is it the same 3-5 meta weapons?
you need to test multiple servers on multiple maps, because like we have seen maps sometimes influence class choice, or weapon choice, like bfv panzerstorm im usually scout for longer range fights or assaut for AT.
However on the church map im medic bc its smaller engagements and more chaotic and people die faster
some servers on bf1 half the lobby uses one gun or class on the same map and another people use different stuff
yeah im using an example for weapon variety in BFV like i said
I see
and bf1 too, even 2042 for the limited time i played it
The test is specific to games with unlocked weapon systems anyways. Probs best to watch the video intro, then skip to the end result. This creator is dilusional tho. Even tho their results show a variety of weapons used, they still say that only meta guns will be used in an unlocked weapons system.
4 BTK AR up to 50 meters isn't meta obviously 😂 Bruh it's THE meta AR. PP29 makes most others obsolete but not SFAR.
No
AC9 isn't meta outside of CQC maps.
PP29 is
AR damage model, LMG mag size, SMG speed
🤓☝️
So this applies to every "meta" weapon then I guess. Do. We just put a bunch of asterisk beside the word meta?
SFAR is meta*
*outside of cqc areas
They’ve only been playing since bf1, and likely never actually put more then 100 hours into the game which means their opinion holds less value
@pure zinc Its just unfair if they do same DMG but can burst on you....people qith DMR's are no Snipers in my eyes🙈
Skill issue
Also snipers are gimmicky
Snipers never really make in impact on match lol
@pure zinc So you have never seen a good Sniper....there is 0 Skill Issue😂 dont want to upset you but same DMG Output with much much much higher firerate😂 come on
Removing something that 0.01% of the playerbase will ever be elite with seems like not the best move
@shy slate the thing is they try to kill via Headshot and if it miss they spam fire on you till 1 bullet hit you👀
So the same as any weapon
i need bf6 NOW
he played 10 matches, that's a pretty solid sample size, imo.
more is always better obvioulsy, but if there're a pretty good variety in 10 matches, it'll likely be like that even in 20
What are we testing?
Can we just stick with the same classes as bf3 and 4 no need for all this gadget rubbish. Get it back to battlefield roots. Fair enough have pick ups on a timer like the sniper in locker conquest but keep it simple and nice. Go back to the basics and you will have a sell out game but it looks like it will be screwed like 2042! 
Bluds complaining about DMRs yet majority of people domt use them.
Battlefield fans try not to complain about stupid stuff challenge impossible
at this point i've decided that BF "fans" not only want to complain, but need to complain. There's people out there cherry picking every lil detail just to find something to complain about 
Is the OHK SVK to the face a problem? Yes.
I dont have a problem gravitating to a weapon if it means it isn't unbalanced.
OHK dmr to the dome close to med range isnt much of a problem with a slow fire rate and sluggish handling like the SR338 in BF4, its got enough of a learning curve to deter most people from ever using it. The SVK is bc 2042 has non liniar dmg fall of so it only drops in dmg after 125m and the spread while moving over all in that game is Much lower, like 1 degree vs 0.19 degrees.
Dmrs are only broken in a game without movement and if they are super spammable
Imagine m1 garand from bf2042 if it had bf1 movement
😍
A dmr just getting one hit kills is stupid due to it purely being a semi auto with a high fire rate.
Bf1 and 5 movement were peak imo
Is the m1 in 2042 rlly good? I never got to use it when I last played
Two shot kill up to 75 meters and one shot kill in the head under 20ish meters
But it has kind of a harsh recoil
damn
kinda nuts
Bf1 had no movement
BF1 movement was so freckin boring
man attention span really has declined
?
There was none
it really sucked that everyone in BF1 was stuck standing around in the spawn point, and it was just randomly decided who would win 
?
i miss when the majority of new fps releases just let you walk, run, crouch and lay down lol
sliding in bf1/V was probably the best imo cuz it wasn't really that noticable in combat compared to more recent games
Bf2 had dolphin diving
Bf3 had ads stablitation jump, jump peeking. Chain jumps, strafing
Bf4 had strafing, airstrafing, jump chaining, jump peeking, ads stablisation jumping, crouch slide or stand slide after crouching once or twice mid air, crouch spam
Bf1- cant use jump for anything, cant use slide for anything, cant strafe, cant crouch spam
Bf5- 4 directional slide, jump shooting, leaning mid slide/jumping, manual leaning, ads stabilitation jump, crouch run, roll
5 probs had more stuff cant think of more atm
Yet BF1 is the most successful game in the franchise. Go figure. A nice balance between the predictability of BF1 and the movement ability of V would be nice.
?
indeed
“A nice balance of nothing and movement would be nice”💀
Thanks for repeating my sentence, but yes. Not no movement ability, but not overly fast as many disliked with V
Bf5 has equal amount of active players as bf1
And 5 isnt overly fast, wasnt disliked for movement in the first place
The average player wants a mostly predictible experience, not to be jump strafed or corner jumped constantly
Yet it sold under half as many copies
The issue that 5 had was “looks” “woman” “arm” and “visibility” (valid)
And maps were dogshit
Yes and it still has equal amount of players
Actively playing it
the most common thing youll hear in the BF community is also "BF1 was peak" with next to no mention of BFV...outside of randoms aying they liked its movement
Speaks volumes TBH
not worth arguing with him as far as I'm concerned, unless you are just bored rn. He's not gonna argue in good faith, as you can see. He just squabbles for fun
Speaks volumes that people are bad at the games and want a game with completely nothing
Yeah, ill just get called a casual, or a bot for having a differing opinion.
There we go, right on time.
Its true though
"You dont like the same thing as me, so you are bad"
They want no skill depth because the game would be too hard for them otherwise
Im speaking for me
Funnily enough remember how you talked about how the majority of players dont play against players that actually understand when and how to use these mechanics
dude how do you enjoy literally any game pre like 2012 if you consider bf1 movement as nothing lol
.
Pickle argues with one hand while anyone responses to his bad faith and intentionally dumbed down points
I mean theres literally 0 reason to have less movement options and viability than 2042 or 5
i cant double sprint in skyrim bad game
I also really need to make a video on bf5 slide
Its a PVE RPG game
Also doesnt care about the quality of the games for the vast majority of players, only for them. Which is fine. But I can only imagine the garbage pile of a game we would get if they just gave them what they wanted.
clearly you hate skill, as movement is the only defining characteristic of skill
People arent losing anything from a video game from having an usuable slide
fuck its like when people in battlebit figured out a movement exploit and people started to stop playing until they tried to fix it
Be fr
Battlebit died due to lack of content and updates
Lets not make things up
Also bad patches
bro you weren't there lol, the movement exploit had people pissed
it wasnt "THE" reason
I played the pre alpha, beta and launch day
if it is an exploit, the one using it is the one lacking skill as they clearly cannot win a fight fairly
Until the game pretty much died
Never heard of it
Never saw it
you could tldr basically jump, and then do some imput shit to slide backwards
and it wasn't a thing till mid-late life
Meaning not really an issue
Use BF4 movement exploits as example of stuff in BF4 > Movement exploits in other games arent an issue
Oh so you not seeing movement performed in a game means it doesn’t have movement
An interesting perspective
Given what was being said a few days ago
Bf4 exploits werent an issue either
Because...
Because rarely used
do you have like mental breakdowns when going on a walk because you cant slide cancel and bhop irl or smth dude
OMG he actually admitted it
It took 2 days but you can finally rest easy
https://youtu.be/jQl5mY3Ekpk?si=FBrglan795rocKSj “slide too fast” 👴
?
OMG SCREENSHOT
You spend like 3 hours arguing that those movement things were common BF4 2/3 days ago, now a complete 180 cos youre trying to prove a point in a different game. Just shows how unreliable you are, opinion wise
They are currently common
Oh it had to be done
Watch them try to backtrack now...cos they can forever not use this example to win an arguement on movement
You are talking about games that you likely did not play much back in the day and havent touched since the release of bf4
You can go to pretty much any cqc based server and youll see it in practically every server
Look at the back tracking
🤣
Sorry bro, big mistake. At least you were honest for once. even if you had to be tricked into it
Because the current players (2-3k) that are playing have played it for far longer and actually are more likely to know and use these exploits
How did you trick me into anything
Its pretty obvious that no one used zouzou rouzou vouzou mouzou actively back in the prime days of bf4
Thats not what you were saying a few days ago
When bf4 had a much larger and a much fresher playerbase
?
dude i played bf4 a week ago and only one person on locker that i saw (killed me) used it
Ah were back to losing > abuse the other person. Careful to not get another time out.
I legit talked about airstrafing though
this room was actually somewhat bearable in that day
Glad I could be here for this momentous occasion
Let me know when some actually interesting discussions happen
.
Airstrafing is not an exploit in the game
Airstrafing is a mechanic that allowed you to move within air with your midair AWSD keys and you were also able to move with your mouse obviously
all i need to do is say 3 words and this chat group would light up for 30 minutes about the same topic lol
I know youre pretty much clueless on the series since you only played 2042 but please stop talking about exploits if you dont know about them
And cant differate between exploits and implanted game mechanics
And you have no counter arguments because you lied about a statement that i apparently made (again) lol
Like the same time when you tried telling everyone how i wanted to make the game harder for everyone and wanted them to add complex movement

Good film
Hardly far from the truth is it?
It’s possible for us to have a genuine discussion, it’s just a certain someone here cannot
Why lie when i can send the message links lol
How is me saying this some kinda "Gotcha" moment?
I just said youre lying about statements
This is why you want it, you...as a better player...want more advanced movement, so you can be even better than an average player.
AKA...you want it to be harder for an average player to compete again you. Making the game harder for them
Im even better than an average player with or without movement it doesnt matter it just makes the game less garbage
It wont be harder for anyone and its easier for them aswell to play the game lol
The lies we tell ourselves
Instead of dying to unavoidable grenades, vehicles, uncrossable parts of the map
👍
Why do you outright lie though
Like where do you even make these statements up from
Because you change your reasoning for and opinion on things more than my GF
I havent
agree to disagree
For me it is, c'ya
Aw leaving because youre losing? Like the other 3 times i told you to prove me wrong on those statements?
🥺
See I dont care about losing. I got what I wanted
What does this prove btw
Have a nice day, back to work for me
You screenshotted it as if ive denied that exploits were barely used?
When we never talked about exploits?
Lol?
Average player plays Fortnite, Apex, CoD, those games has movement, if you take away movement from BF and make it more and more casual they won't stick for long because they will think it's boring af.
Its not even about it being more or less fun you just legit cant play a game that doesnt even allow you to strafe
Like what the fuck lol
32v32 game and youre forced to stand still whilist being constantly in contact with most of the enemies
https://youtu.be/-KjULtW4ugg?si=xebrk55dOA6zyFeR you get shat on by nades like this 99% of the time in bf1
And for what good reason? Just so bad players can obtain lazy, unskilled, cheap free kills?
what, defines a skilled player to you?
sliding around like a decapitated chicken or lik what?
How does use of slide make someone a good player
Or spamming it at random occurances
“i think the people who are asking for less movement dont understand that having movement doesnt mean its going to be absurdly mechanically skill based”
“and the people who are asking for movement within the game dont mean complex high paced movement either”
“it was a good slide for rotating between positions and moving around positions”
“you could slide into peeks, slide into cover, slide from one position to the other”
Thats like the actual mindful use of a slide mechanic
Talked about bf5 slide specifically
Ingeneral, a good player is someone who makes good thought out plays with good positioning, with good predictions, good map knowledge, good at gunplay mechanics, good at movement mechanics, good timing, good target picking, good aim, keeps momentum high
Also notice how bf5 slide is used for positioning so it actually makes that “grounded positioning gameplay” even better
And being able to slide in and out of cover meant that you arent stuck to running from position A to position B in a singular running motion (only option in bf1)
Youre less predictable, to shoot at, harder to react to
Im just trying to have fun gaming, jesus
If you guys are super analizing ms worth of ads and movement mechanics this hard, just:
We all are
Most of the community doesn't get that impression
Maybe we also want games to be fun and we are just trying to figure out what would be fun for us
That's like a government passing a bill that makes everyone happy
LOCK THE GUNS IN CLASSES !!! Don’t need an assault class running a sniper rifle! Battlefield devs it’s not that hard
Do snipers ever genuinely make an impact in a match?
No they dont
It doesnt matter
🤦♂️
Yes it does if we’re emphasizing and getting back to class play 😑
A good one can
Still won't
yeah..
yes lol
You are forced to camp
you really aren't
And can't really go for obj as well as you are cqc impaired
Thats what snipers do ya dunce
can still prevent repeeks or take out those people holding defensive spots due to the instant ttk
Yeah and that's why they dont make an impact lmao
You just proved my point
But I'm talking about conquest specifically
Battlefield 4 class locked was negligible and you dont complain, its not much of a difference.
People will stop choosing a class for a gun anymore and just choose for the class itself
Also not many people play their classes right
You ever been not able to move close to a point because a cracked sniper turns his entire direction into a kill zone?
Barely
💀
Fair, it does happen tho.
Not too much
Sniper might aswell be a recon like lmao
Hmmm wait
It is
idk why you think snipers do nothing lol
ive seen them defend entire OBJs in conquest
I didnt say they do nothing
I said they usually dont make an impact on a match
They dont really
Not much
you said no lmfao
Requires skill to be good at
You said that I said that they do nothing when I didnt say that
They just dont make much of an impact usually
It requires skill to
They are the only class with a spawn placer, and a good placement of one is game changing
"do snipers ever genuinely make an impact in a match?
no they dont"
literally word for word what you said lol
Ok
But there's a difference between doing nothing and not making an impact
Stop putting words in my mouth
Usually the receiving end can’t effectively fire back unless they’re a sniper aswell
Well funny enough people usually just use a Carbine/DMR as opposed to sniper om the class
BF1 didn’t have any sniper rifles in assault class if I recall correctly? Just bolt actions and semi auto rifles?
There's a difference between doing nothing and not making an impact on a match
True
"im taking the goal post, and moving it somewhere else"
More AR, Carbines and dmr
All depends on how you play the role, if you like ARs and DMRs go ahead. But I still believe that someone with a great aim and a sniper can lock down an entire point. Snipers CAN make an impact, but you got to be a good shot
Agreed^
I am not one of those people, but I still Stand by that statement as I have seen it happen a lot
Well someone with great aim is mostly what will make them make an impact with snipers
But good aim with a sniper specifically
Some people literally use them so much they know the bullet drop at all ranges pretty much
Those are the people who can make an impact
Like fast firing
it is so genuinely funny when someone starts shooting at you with an ar and you just instantly tap them
1 taps
