#battlefield-labs-discussion
1 messages · Page 95 of 1
Correct
its still stuff like executive decisionmaking and asset sharing, additional testing, but you're right
No more Labs bois?
If the br mode is executed correctly it will be soo coool
I am soo hyped this game could be the best game in the series
I hope Portal will be good too!
Labs will still be around as a test environment for BF6
Even after the beta it'll still be on and potentially a CTE for bf6 updates and changes
I don't see labs going anywhere near the drain it's way too ambitious of a project for only a few months till bf6 reveal
i thought no health bar and ammo reload the whole mag health a player needs them to heal them squads etc even the Hud i did on portal try
people spamming "remember don't preorder" should have their system hardware banned from the game. Not like EA/DICE is losing any sales from them
fine ill call
I mean battlefield labs been going on for like 4 or 5 months already? Its just closed to like 75k people not open.
from the way they've worded it, it's probably gonna be much more than a hype builder and leak source till bf6 reveal
We shouldn’t pre order tho lol 😭
I mean its just a closed alpha test set up they gathering feedback from and testing server capacity, spawns, weapon balance, new or old mechanics etc
Why would your messed up mind think of something like that? I pre ordered 42 and wish I never did
Why?
Don't pre order people
Last i heard they are accepting more applications for Battlefield Labs now to test sever overflow performance and stuff, but I still never got invited lol. They had well over 5 million applications submitted for it and only took 75k to start and now adding another 75k
I’m gonna pre order 1000 copies that’s how much trust I have in DICE 
Hell yeah bruther, send me a link
do not pre - order
Always pre order. Or you'll miss out
not saying we should but the people who say it are actual roomtemp humans
What if you dont pre order bf6, and the game ends up being good, and supplies for digital downloads is limited and you dont get a copy and cant play!!!!
we're on the verge of a beta, who cares
Lmfao
L0000000L
Fair lol
pre order for the 3 day early access. So I can learn the maps and farm scrubs on launch day
Tbh the 3 day early launch on bf2042 had zero bugs for me
Then when full launch day hit, was hellah glitchy and crashy with servers overflowing lol and then i couldn't play
🤣 🤣
They gunna make bf6 codes like bitcoin, limited supply of downloads to create rarity and increase profits
same but i stopped playing once they took the xp away from the portal servers that were run by communities
tryna start a BF shitcoin with me?
Can’t wait to hit a triple bunny hop dolphin dive day one 
To immediately see all chat say “report skeezy cheats”
PC players don't complain about movement nearly as much
it's all the sub 1 KD console players that play at 65 FOV who think this game is milsim adjacent
65 FOV console dozer mains vs PC MacKay probably does look like speed hacks lmao
why cant i get to the page that shows every avaible playtest
Imagine how fast a Sundance flies across their screen lmao
Shit looks super sonic lol
like a falcon plucking a mouse from the ground
Lmfao
Sure
I used to be a huge pkp/bizon+sundance player back at the start of 2042
was STUPID fun
pkp+the RoF mag specifically, idk if mag but whatever it was that increased the base rof, haven't played 2042 in awhile
Remember no preorders
People who preorder are literally gamblers
And moan constantly if it turns out shit
Just because you said that i will buy 3 copies of the big edition as soon as its available. 
The big edition 😅, you even played Battlefield?
Even worse, usually they try to justify it, which is way more pathetic
i mean, big edition, deluxe edition, call it whatever ye want. The most expensive one~
rip ozzy
I hope soo. I will be very happy when I remember your 3 copies after release
Enjoy constant persistence data issues I guess lol, you’ll totally be doing so much “farming”
People when the game franchise that used to market itself on its themes and had more grounded, milsim adjacent gameplay mechanics attracts people who want it to stay that way
BF randomly switching between Roman numerals and normal numbers would be so weird lmao, BFV isn’t even technically “Battlefield 5”, it’s a reference to that V for victory thing
Market itself on grounded milsim adjacent gameplay

It’s been a run and gun arcade shooter since the beginning
Yup PlayStation player, “milsim adjacent” tracks
It’s definitely been a sandbox shooter but before you think you know what you’re talking about, let’s check out Battlefield 3s description on several store pages:
“In Battlefield 3, players step into the role of the elite U.S. Marines. As the first boots on the ground, players will experience heart-pounding missions across diverse locations including Paris, Tehran and New York. As a U.S. Marine in the field, periods of tension and anticipation are punctuated by moments of complete chaos. As bullets whiz by, as walls crumble, as explosions force players to the ground, the battlefield feels more alive and interactive than ever before.”
Plus, ya know, the entire suppression mechanic
Kinda walked right into that one my dude
Nice link buddy
2007 - “run and gun” from one of the founding devs
But again, another 65 FOV playing console scrub that thinks this is a slow, milsim adjacent game
65 FOV? I’d rather watch paint dry
And not a run and gun shooter with an authentic setting
That’s exactly what it is lol I’m agreeing with you. But I don’t know why you’re surprised that people want an emphasis on good balancing but also good themes like they’re mutually exclusive. BF has never been the franchise for “movement”
Also how does any of this describe a milsim adjacent shooter? It’s just a description of the setting
It’s concerning how console player literally do not understand wtf a milsim is
Battlefield has obviously always liked to play slightly more into milsim adjacent themes and balancing over CoD which was its only real competition for the longest time, it’s obviously still an arcade shooter though
Like the og class system is obviously trying to replicate how real squads work irl with dedicated snipers and all that, the og suppression system tried to replicate what being shot at would actually kinda be like, so on so forth
gotta remember that until COD4, create a class didn't even exist in shooters. so if anything Battlefields continuance of a more restrictive system was less an original Battlefield identity that came from a milsim theme, and moreso a choice to make games more similar to every other shooter at the time
its definitely more grounded than COD, but I'd rather them focus on an immersive experience than a milsim one, which I think they do well
TBF battlefield classes are very different from COD create a class, the way weapon restrictions worked, character models, gadgets, etc, but yeah that’s a good point
oh yeah, they're more similar to all the other games before COD came and changed things
Realistic setting do not play into “milsim themes”. Milsim is gameplay functionality, not aesthetic settings
No class systems were just a normal shooter thing back in the early 2000s, nothing to do with milsim adjacency
Imo BF has always been more "authentic" than actually realistic
wtf is this? COD created build-a-class in shooters?
It attempts to make itself feel immersive and authentic while having more arcadey gameplay features
Although I think suppression is a good example of how BF used to play more into milsimmy elements
i guess to be more accurate, until that game it wasn't a system that existed in popular multiplayer shooter games. you could select classes, but not create them to the level that that game brought to the industry
Then I’d be arguing with you all day trying to establish the idea that some of BFs gameplay design might be inspired by more realistic, what we know today as milsimmy elements, if that’s just how you refuse to see it
But I don’t want BF to be a milsimmy game either (although I’m ngl I wouldn’t protest the idea), obviously they should focus on arcadey but immersive themes and games
Suppression in BF3 was not milsimmy. Milsims don’t have your bullets shoot at 45° when getting shot
The specific implementation isn’t the same but it’s definitely inspired by
Point is it existed honestly solely because “it’s realistic”, whereas defending it for that reason today has people say to you “go play arma bro”
agree
the "go play arma" thing is so funny lol
actually do go play arma because its better than most shooters out right now, and you'll probably end up wishing most other shooters had things that game series has
It’s either that or cod
Both just feel like conversation enders
I’d rather learn how to play a milsim than keep putting up with the BS EA and Activision put out
Squad casually adding entire factions to the game every few months
Its dope, having a skill gap
Immersion doesn’t always equal realism and realism doesn’t always equal milsim.
Suppression was a feature based on real life tactics added for an attempt at more arcadey immersion
Pretending that this game has have been milsim adjacent really does lend itself to the saying, go play a fucking milsim to either learn what milsim mechanics are or find a new home
No it’s not. It’s in the same place within the broader shooter market as it was 10 years ago
lmao
i think that says more about the last ten years of shooters than it does about arma
Milsim Major right here guys
milsim is more of a pacing/game structure thing imo
Arma 4 when
and battlefield is pretty far removed from that
I think it’s pretty evident how (most) of the Battlefield community prefers immersive, milsimmy adjacent (in the loosest terms obviously) games, BF4 and 1 are the most popular games in the franchise for a reason, and we’ve only been on continual decline since V with the franchise
2027 💀
they're not liked for their "milsimmy" stuff
It is. In regards to gunplay it’s essentially how you design the system to dissuade reactive play. Most games in that genre you can clearly see make it more pre-emptive than reactive
They’re liked for their themes, which at this point you get accused of being someone who “wants battlefield to be a milsim” for wanting
that's like immersion which DICE have been doing since 3
authentic is the word you guys are looking foor
BFV was the most milsimmy BF since 2142
authentic theme
How do you become immersed into a setting if it’s not inspired by realistic or authentic themes and gameplay choices
good sound and visual design
Hence V yes was the most milsimmy BF game we’ve had in a while but it kinda unravels itself for other reasons
the spiderman games are immersive
By creating a ruleset that the game’s universe sticks to, that you can shift your mental state into considering real
V plays infinitely better than 1 it's crazy...
bf5 was not authentic at all
I’ll agree to disagree
Realism just makes it easier to bridge that gap
Which, at least for me, stuff like suppression and the og classes helps support, that bridge to considering something real. But at this point I’m repeating myself
Agree
BFV turned out to be a really great game after they spent the time to support it. I hope this new one gets great DLC like that one did
Yeah I get you, and that’s fair. People take their understanding of reality as a basis for what rules fictional universes should follow, if those rules are broken (which can be as simple as an in game character not behaving as you’d expect in-scenario), the care for that world can shatter
Speaking of OG classes I really don't care for how Support & Assault function now
Support being a supplier and a medic feels weird, assault feels weird being the "lone wolf" class since Recon already covered that role over a decade ago
And stuff like supression works to strengthen that bond because we intrinsically know that being shot at is scary, the system brings out that emotion to a degree
This is an infinitely better way to explain it than I could conceive god bless you bro 
100% agreed
But I firmly believe that anyone can shift their mindset to take a fictional world as base and make it immersive that way.
Case in point - silent hill, stalker. You fight zombies, mutants, psychological horrors which aren’t realistic, yet they are all considered immersive.
Cause people don’t look at mutants in stalker and say ‘that isn’t right’. Mutants become the rule, and so you can for lack of a better term, suspend your disbelief and make that fiction your own
HARD agree. I loved the BF1 class system, having a well-rounded squad made each individual member pretty much unstoppable. But if you didn't have teammates contributing to the squad actively, it was a lot harder to steamroll
If anything I remember assault being super curtailed by how it had powerful gadgets but had to hover near supports to get ammo for guns and gadgets. And support killing off medic might incentivize lone wolf playing especially if weapons remain unlocked
Exactly! And Battlefield is meant to be a team game and always has been, giving Support ammo & healing goes against that imo
that's why we need 5 classes...
Assault and support seperation could've been good if they didn't remove assault's medpen
Now no reason to play as assault, everyone will use support for infinite self heal and ammo
The same way I can get immersed into a game like the Witcher?
I hate to be that guy but that's one reason I preferred the old class roles, they worked fine and shoving two burdens onto one class while removing the burden from one doesn't make sense
It’s a topic I’ve been discussing with friends, randoms and even uni lecturers for a long, long while… it’s a complicated topic
Eh that and the spider man example are different. They’re totally fictional scenarios, I can easily understand how you can become immersed into that with basic world building. But FPS games set in real world inspired locations with real world people, guns, vehicles, etc?
Honestly if assault returned to being a medic having a med pen would be sick, aggressive medic is like my second favorite play style
The only advantage will probably be anti tank/aircraft gadgets but good luck finding a support to resupply them from
It’s called suspension of disbelief, BF is set in a fictional world as well, inspired by the real world.
Just like Spider-Man, just like Witcher
BF1 was super immersive, not a single thing played out like actual WW1 trench warfare
Nah, ever since BF4 they decided to stray away from assault medic meta. When most people plays as one class while ignoring others it's an issue. BF1 and BFV's assault and medics were seperated because of that, assault was engineer. 2042 has a nice balance imo besides specialists. Assault is lone wolf. Support is healing and giving ammo. BF6 system was going to be good too if they didn't remove assault's medpen 
Don’t hate to be that guy
I’ve been long vocally supportive of the OG classes. No reason to reinvent the wheel
Issue with BF3-4 system is many people were ignoring other players while they were playing as medic, half the medics don't even have defibs in those games. They have launchers instead. Dedicated medic and dedicated assault is better.
The OG classes are from 1942/BF2
Medpen would be cool if it was single use, could only be resupplied from supply stations (basically what BFV did with the medpack), but giving an assault character an infinite use health stim makes medics completely useless
BC2/BF3/4 reinvented the wheel by smushing a bunch of them together
Support can still heal recon and engineers
And created problems like recons gadgets outside of beacon not meshing with the “sniper” gameplay
Convo isn’t really going anywhere but I’ll just say this: suspension of disbelief absolutely. I’m not expecting BF to get every little detail right either. But it also helps to have gameplay elements inspired by realistic or immersive design choices which some today would consider “milsimmy”
Support and engineers are more symbiotic than ever in BF6 in fact, they give both ammo and heal to them
Assault-Medic being the overwhelming class choice
You left out that assault in bf4 had access to some of the best guns in the game which heavily contributed to people not playing their role correctly, if we're gonna have open weapons Recon would work just fine as a lone wolf and people could easily have access to the weapons they want
Assault had best guns and best gadgets which is why they are seperated after 4
The latter which you mentioned is what I started with so idk, it’s just been the BC2/3/4 way for so long so I prefer that
Recon has been lone wolf since they merged sniper and special forces from BF2
2042 recon was able to put in actual team play work for a change
i don't really care for assault being incentivized to be a "lone wolf" either. Sure you can do it, but you're infinitely better with your squad in a well-balanced system. Giving them a medic in their pocket is directly counter to that philosophy in a way I don't think makes the game better at all
Can’t wait to see what BF6, all I can say to them is Just don’t fuck it up
I repeated it again
Don’t Fuck It Up
A single use medpen that has to be resupplied by a med box doesn’t counter that philosophy.
DICE for whatever reason decided to test it with a fast recharge rate instead of single use in the playtest
wholeheartedly agree. its the recharge i had an issue with, not the ability to heal
if anything, giving your tip of the spear role a single use health pen is good design to keep a character fighting just a lil longer, but not infinitely
It makes sense with the philosophy of get in, clear areas, come back. Recharge kind of got rid of that need to come back outside of ammo, but the pen helps
I’m still going to push to give the assault a med box and see how it plays
i can see the reasoning behind this too, despite disagreement
Just seems logical to me
Have everyone else move up alongside them, so other people in the team see their value
They do have value at the moment but to offset the open weapons you’d need rather egregious gadgets and strong perks to compensate
Which is my biggest gripe with open now anyway
Make grenade launchers great again
But not too great
I want preseason launch month to be the noob tube month
This is a good point. In a weapons restricted scenario, I kinda think that Assault having the best weapons makes up for this. But if they're unrestricted it's an entirely different set of balance requirements
Thought so too but guess we’ll see in the beta
-# Dice please don't ever tutorialise the airburst
As of last playtest one of the support perks buffs the airburst/mortar 
More ammo and quicker resupply
I wish they weren’t here but oh well
welcome back BF1 mortar spam
I pray they have the same functionality as the tank mortars
If it’s just clicking on maps that would be rough
yeah they should require more skill to use
tbf the same labs build had a perk that gave assaults an extra "med pen" despite the med pen turning into the stim
Wasn’t the mortar apart of the training perks before
Wouldn’t that make it less spammable
in the first builds recon had an artillery strike as their level 3 call-in
For recon
but support has a mortar gadget
looks like 1BF datamined a potential release date within the game files
nah lol
everything be releasing in October
assault is the only role that has a very infantry farm heavy loadout
thats the entire point of the class
always has been
the 2042 delay ...
2042 assault was more balanced than BF4 assault
I meant Oct being release date-palozaa for gaming in general
it's like the default month for Q4 releases
ngl I thought it was gonna be November or December
Leaks were crazy for BF6 tbh, regardless of release date, we saw gameplay before title reveal, we saw beta announcement before title reveal, we see release date leaks before announcement trailer 
bless our dataminers
Even EA didn't care and announced open beta before reveal 
bless chinese playtesters and their disdain for NDAs and american intellectual property 
🫡 🇨🇳
Hell they are even livestreaming it like it's nothing 😭
lol
They have their own fair use laws which ramp up the fairness (communism) which is why everything can be public
beast mode
Game releasing in oct it seems
🤫
Hope we are getting server browser bcoz I'm not buying for manipulated matchmaking again
Hated it in cod and then marvel rivals
David from BF Labs said long ago we won't be getting SBMM
So I would like to trust his word on it
SBMM would destroy Battlefield formula as can be seen in Delta Force
they wont call it SBMM for sure but there will be something for player retension
thats why i badly want server browser like previous titles to join any match any time
ohh man i had to uninstall after few matches
it was sweaty af for me lol bo6 trauma
2042 has no SBMM so even with matchmaking if we are getting 2042 system I would be fine with that
i was referring to delta
Oh okay lol
server browser is core feature of battlefield titles, especially for community servers in the future
I don't think we will get a server browser tbh
nah I believe it'll be like BFV. Quick play matchmaking front and center but a click or two and you're in the server browser
I hope Portal is the server browser replacement
I doubt they will give us a portal that allows us to search for official servers
tbh good. means community servers can take center stage cause if you want official you just... queue up in mm
Have you seen portal? It's unplayable
not lately cause idrc
It has 2 types of servers:
- 4vs128 bot farm servers
- 1000% damage, no bullet drop, Afghanistan/Ukraine milisim servers
well thats what the community seems to want
thats what they make, so either you gotta set up your own, or well... theres always mm which is quite literally the default experience that most folks opt for anyways
if you want something specific you quite literally have the tools to make it so within portal
Isnt delta force alive?
It is but unplayable due to matchmaking
And lets not forget the Zombies servers lol
real BF fans played BF 2142 ong
Has any dev talked about skins and the like? If i see Niki Minaji running around I'm out
At least give me the option to not see them on my screen
This isnt cod lol
It could become like it, who knows. Also, 2042 didn't have Niki Minaji but it was bad as well.
Isnt that bad now though, playable
Cant wait to see how you guys fuck up the next battlefield, looking forward to the days to come
How??
bro chose violence and didnt say anything back
who nutted in your cornflakes thismorning?
Some people here actually like that
seems it instead of crunchy nut they like lumpy nutt
💀
Pete Parsons? Don't you have a company to manage.. I mean a vintage car collection to grow?

Question 1: What Is Battlefield 6?
Question 2: What All Previous Maps Is In Battlefield 6?
Question 3: Is Battlefield 6 Single Player/Story Mode?
Battlefield 6 is a game
Battlefield 6 is battlefield 
Next game
Don’t know if it has remade maps
It has a campaign
Operation Firestorm is pretty much confirmed returning as far as i knows
Nothing is confirmed.
Nothing is confirmed
Proof people who are casual BF players can't read
Battlefield 6 is cod modern warfare 2019
True
False, it's actually just Purble Place.
Technically, nothing is confirmed until tomorrow. Everything from labs is unfinished
2042 skins weren’t bad and fit that game
well... most of them lol
Lava skin mckay and whoever the other one was, was...... an interesting choice
the animated skins were kinda bleh
If they add skins they need to add a toggle to disable cosmetics for people who don't want to look at that junk
that ain't gonna happen lmao
ever
Just stick to a military setting
Easy, no need to have animated skins, pink unicorns, golden skulls and bs like that
told y'all 🙂
he told us
They will never add an option like that, what people should ask for is ''authentic skins'' option. You won't see Dino Mackay skins but you will I dunno, that administator skin for Mackay.
I would be fine with "authentic" skins if they didn't always become the slippery slope into beevis and butthead
Don't worry, they'll only add the stupid skins halfway into season 2 battlepass so everyone is already invested in playing the game
Lol true
Rest assured, I will pay $120 for the "Phantom Edition" that has useless cosmetics and I will play at least 500 hours
part of the issue and is proud is crazy, delusional, maybe therapy
BF2042 had to be shit so that more people would want to play the next one
Why are you still here? Didn’t you write a paragraph about how this game is cooked and you’re leaving the series?
I mean that’s almost every animated skin in every game. Never look good
I hope they have enough restraint to not go for these
i know this is not something you know
its called when you are pationate but critical because you want the best for the game
fanboys cannot comprehend this
Replace critical with sceptical for a balanced approach
Dont break your NDA. Just silly at this point.
i didnt 🗣️
bro onto nothing 💔
fr
I hope the sound design of the new game will be good. I want to hear the enemy's footsteps well.
This is the worry, never played it but that 2042 rip off said the same when it first but I've noticed it got shite in it now
Nah you’re just a doomer who posts blatantly wrong shit then tries to claim they played the labs
But hide behind the “I’m passionate about the game” vibe tho
The campaign is gonna be og mw3 but instead of Russia it's pax
Hello admins. The game is expected to be finished well, and listening to its loyal players, this new Battlefield is its salvation. If it doesn't turn out as expected, it'll be the end.
pax is a coalition so russia is not the only enemy
True
I hope italy is in pax
pax armata is latin and maybe its some mussolini guy trying to restore rome
It would be cool to see honestly battlefield where it's not always "America good everyone else bad" but I ain't complaining
fr america good russia bad is boring lol
Yeah, exactly. I would love to see a EU Vs USA due to USA or EU betraying eachother
lmao EU countries vs EU countires.
EU gonna fight each other soon
Bro scrap the game add operators back and don't forget about the robot dogs
Probably with eco friendly tanks and all that
Lmao
An actual interesting setting for a modern setting FPS
Yeah USA Vs Russia gets real boring.
lol who cares about the lore
Me
Me aswell
just use whatever cool real locations you want for maps
people want a believable narrative and setting. It helps sell the overal 'experience'
I can't believe I'm seeing people say Russia attacking NATO is more probable, especially after Ukraine 😭 😭 😭
I guess for singleplayer
Fr
I mean it's cool if you don't care for the lore, just don't expect it to be a mutual feeling among everyone
Lore definitely matters,it gives the entire game purpose
Why else do you think people rave on about BF1. I didn't like that game much in general but it nailed setting the tone and brutality of ww1 as well as having multiple factions, not just uk vs germany fighting across Europe
Yeah
The WW2 setting is so over done it's not even funny
Would be cool if we got 1 or 2 non EU countries in it too besides USA
BF1 was such a breath of fresh air
maybe whole nation seasons
Just to throw bfv and 2042 in your face
that was a great setting, but yeah setting and lore are different
They can go hand & hand and often do
Yeah but lore explains why you are in that setting
yeah I want the MEC back. Basically a coalition of middle Eastern nations. That would be a cool way to have maps set there instead of US vs other faction but desert.
with a good lore u feel more connected
I get you, just I think ultimately it doesnt matter as long as the game is good anyway
Yeaaah
Middle Eastern countries don't exactly have great militaries, besides Iran and Saudi maybe
I certainly hope they will do something like that in season 3 or something
yeah ik, that's why I said make them a coalition. Like in BF2
Even as a coalition...
Iran's a paper tiger and Saudi can barely stand against Yemen so
They could be put as guerrilas, I think that's always really cool to see
Because every other BF game other than 2042 has had multiple factions added across post-launch
. Idk why people barely talk raise an issue on this.
Like bc2
😭 bro it's a game. France of all nations leaving Nato makes no sense irl
Fair
isnt there a pattern if france italy and spain leaves nato
I hope 6 has a good amount of maps in europe, too many european nations have such cool architecture it would be a shame to miss out on seeing it in game
We only have 1 so far, Right?
agreed. Good mix of maps across every continent
Only thing I know about the maps is two of them take place in NYC so I have no idea
I just see people saying Pax makes no sense, I'm saying the same about MEC. I don't care either way though
Well the teaser confirmed 1 in Gibraltar too
Turkey, but will probably lumped in NATO. Egypt is also 19th on globalfirepower.
Gibraltar in Europe, one in Egypt, one in Azerbaijan? Or am I mixed up?
so one ine belgium and georgia too ?
Wait oh yeah there most likely is going to be a map in Belgium!
I forgot about Egypt
The Egypt map is my favourite so far
I think georgia map can be rly cool
Those might just be campaign locations, not multiplayer
No clue but Gibraltar sounds like a great location, Venice would be sick but I don't think we're getting that
Possibly
Visited recently I was quite literally thinking it would be a great map for bf6
😂
Very cqb
Prague would be cool as fuck
Maybe when they add boats and stuff
That is the most gamer thing I've heard in awhile 😂 I'm guilty of that too when I visited Boston
Bro it's all I do
We saw Gibraltar in the very first teaser for the game like a year ago. Very likely a MP map too
Are the testing launchers useless now? Kinda been waiting for everything to end before i delete it
They’ll most likely make it very clear when testing is done
Hopefully
I thought it was already over since theres a bf6 channel now ngl
They wouldn’t leave labs sign ups on if testing wasn’t going on so they’d say when that closes
I mean I think BF labs will continue into the game's life. Just like the bf4/1 ctes
That would be kinda cool to have a dedicated test build for future testing ngl ik sony is stingy with it so kinda a w we already have it on ps
Why end it before the game launches, it's a good way to get balanced feedback quickly and implement it in the final product
maybe they do some closed beta stuff with it
BF6 channel? It's brainrot 
We saw one of the Gibraltar maps in leaked labs gameplay and data mining shows a second
Supposedly in some old WW2 tunnels under Gibraltar… so welcome back metro/operation underground
Fort Vaux!
some takes in this teaser reminds me of Zavod 311...
What if Peter Thiel will be the campaign villain
What if Peter Parker.
just cast kevin spacey 
any news about locked weaopns?
Fuck grapple hooks give me web sling in Bf6
Open Weapons vs Closed Weapons
Why not both?
Starting at Open Beta players can choose official playlists with Signature Weapons locked to class, or not.
More to come.
some twitter posts suggesting weapon restrictions in the full release, but that's unconfirmed
i really hope they do persistent battle passes
the whole trend of fomo as a marketing tool sucks
Can’t get fomo if you don’t care about the pass content 😎
Yeah. We probably won't know which one they will add to the final game until after the open beta
How it feels to not give a damn about live service fomo
Agreed, I would've bought season 5 BP if I was playing back in S5
But I wasn't playing it so I can't buy it 🤷
Hey dudes
regardles of what get picked, the complaints will be loud 
If Locked gets picked:
"WhY ArE YoU LiMiTiNg PlAyEr ChOiCe!?"
If Unlocked gets picked:
"WhY ArE YoU ThRoWiNg AwAy CoRe AsPeCtS oF BaTTleFiEld!?"
yea pretty much 
As they say..

I havent seen nearly as many die hard unlocked supporters as locked ones
Including myself, most dont seem to care what they do
I think because alot of them are like "eh doesn't matter much to me" 
What does matter to me is overal class synergy, I don't want to see systems like launch 2042 where you can do and handle everything mostly on your own 
launch mackay with basically infinite sprint with the grappler
optional in game purchases... boo!
free post launch maps, vehicles, weapons... wooo!!!!
I want SMGs to be useful in TDM/Locker instead of them having total 5% pick rate due to them being tied to a class that's useless in game modes like that 🤷
That's part of the balancing though? You get a better close-range weapon in exchange for worse gadgets
Though, there are also uses for engineer's gadgets even without vehicles. For example, things like the RPG are good for direct-fire splash damage
Or people will use whatever's the most SMG-like AR or Carbine and ignore SMG class altogether, people chooses their class before their weapons
I personally don't see an issue with that. In your system, Engineer will get ignored anyways cause, as you said, its gadgets aren't fit for that type of map. You may as well add a reason to play engineer instead of supporting having a 1% engineer pick rate on cqc maps
to be frank, engineer for me has always been a flex pick
too many vehicles to fight? Switch. All vehicles dealt with? Switch back
Harder ever just play engineer off the bat
Because engineers are useless on CQC maps, those people would contribute to nothing as an engineer in those maps, in fact it would make the game worse since they have neither heals of support nor the sustainability of assault
They would contribute to cqc battles and add longer-rage splash damage to choke points instead of just throwing grenades that will only hurt the pushers
Every class can be used on every type of map if you think about it hard enough
Giving high splash damage to rockets would make the game worse that's why DICE doesn't do it
Also at this point what's the point of SMG when you are using engineer for the gadget?
I'm not advocating for high splash damage? Even low splash damage will make people want to move away from where they were camping
Not really, I play BF4 and 2042 recently, rarely see rocket spam like that in Locker/Redacted
PC servers must be different from PS servers. Every time I see a choke point it's like the 4th of July
Most BF4 servers also banned explosives, which makes engineer even more useless
Even in servers with explosives it's better to use airburst with support or assault with bouncing grenades
live service is like a word that activates their minds to hate, like some sleeper agent activation word 
they act like "live service" hasn't been a thing in online games for 20+ years
like baby girl, MMOs been doin this
But, to be fair, MMOs have better quality live service updates.
I mean some of those WoW content droughts…
14 months between the last patch and new expansion has happened
Guys, what's the possible lore of the new Battlefield? Is it set in the same world as 4 and 3? Is it set between 2042, or is it a Battlefield with its own world, unrelated to the others?
probably just something new
BF4 and 2042 were from the same timeline so they’ll probably slam this between them
But also… who pays attention to battlefield lore lol
Does BF3 have any ties to BF4? To me, BF3, B4, and 2042 are from the same worlds at different times.
BF3 and BF4 campaign share characters so… ya
it's also weird they've been pushing a shared universe ting without any compelling characters or worldbuilding
Ah, I always value the lore of any game.
Also #battlefield-6 is talking about this. So I’d hop in there
I doubt most in here care about that stuff so you’re not gonna get much discourse
Can’t play MP without being invested in the world man…
I really want to be immersed!
There comes a time in life when playing online games makes you feel like you're wasting your time. Then, it's almost noticeable that you start to value single-player campaigns where you're fulfilling a kind of "purpose." Different from online games. But why complain? It's Battlefield.
How am I supposed to frag without understanding the background of Baravia and Jarhanpur
The single player campaigns I value aren’t in BF lol
also remove slowmode here please
I have to agree.
Ya with #battlefield-6 being a thing, remove slow mode please
no admin on rn will see this so next time ganslinger is active would be the best time to ask tbh
I don’t know but I think the explosions from Battlefield 4 were the best out of every game in the Franchise
maybe open beta get announced too tomorrow? 👀
one of my buddies said august 4th, and he's an unreliable source
When Battlefield 6 is revealed, can people who played the Pre Alpha talk about their experiences?
Will labs even continue after the open beta 
It would be cool for the campaign to be co-op with a friend 🧑🤝🧑
directly not
o
There was Irish...
RIP
Anyone got vehicle warfare clips?
for bf or just any?
I definetly should not be asking this here
ohhhh you mean from the pt yea no luck
Yea I won’t talk abt this again
Why this fake names for armies armata or idk other fakes, why not make it simple and more interesting make it Russia or usa or china whtever
they wont use russia for obvious reasons
Also welcome to the modern world where “woke” is everywhere and “politics” so just doing fake militaries is abit more better than doing real world counter vs each other
Wording is shit but it’s just makes sense
What about server browsing
I would like the trailer to just say server brower.
i think it should jsut be battlefield portal with all the battlefields loaded up on there it would populate the other games too and keep the franchise alive

simmiler to the halo mastercheif collection but battlefield
Keep the franchise alive, but complete kill their new game lol
what
thats a shared launcher
So i still have labs installed and haven't seen any other opportunities.. Will there be more
500gb just like cod
depends sjut select what ones you want downloaded
Bro, shut up
EA deciding between selling their product in more regions or appeasing the angriest weird guy on the internet as if it’s a hard choice 😂
im just saying in modern context
Issue with ''remasters'' like this is that no one plays them past first 2 weeks. Even when CoD did it more people played Infinite Warfare rather than MW Remastered in the end.
Exactly
Its just a game
@sharp prawn move on, thanks.
yeah we can just end this here
👌
@severe anvil can we remove the slowmode for this channel? #battlefield-6 is going to absorb the majority of discourse and this place hasn't been busy enough the last couple of weeks for a 15 sec timer
Double the timer
I already lowered it, not removing it until after the trailer hype has slowed down. 5 seconds is plenty.
And pass it on to the next person 
reset the timer by preordering the deluxe edition
Well guys, this discord server is about to go nuclear soon.
y
Nope but maybe we will know after the trailer
Ight thx
people expecting gameplay today when they're donig a 3 day event next week 
I like the setting so far, now we just have to hope we don't repeat 2042, with the trailer being great and the game being unplayable at launch
they never showed gameplay during a reveal trailer tho lol
WE ARE SO BACK! BATTLEFIELD IS BACK!
event?
yea, influencers are already invited
BATTLEFIELD IS SAVED!
from what
I don't know.
From Battlefield itself
too early to say
So there is no more 128 players ? We are back to 64 max or custom server can push to 128 players ? Because i think the problem was the size of map and not the 128 players ? Not sure
HOLY SHIT BATTLEFIELD IS BACK GUYS!!! SOLDIERS AND EXPLOSIONS LETS FUCKING GOO
we arent getting 128 players
We luv it
WE DID IT
i busted
IS THERE REALLY NO NAVAL COMBAT
i busted so damn hard the load was so fucking big i couldnt see the screen
I personaly liked 128 players, with mass destruction and medium map size that's would be legendary
okay but for real when the BF theme kicked in it was so 😊
there woll be no more battlefield labs playtests right?
looks good once again like I said, Don't Fuck It Up DICE
just the beta
it just very hard to design around for a casual gamemode
good, the naval maps blew to focus on what was essentially a mini game being played off to the side
Beta isnt even announced yet and they can still test even before the Beta even starts
no but you will play the open beta soon
give us some amphibious assault vehicles like the MAV and some RHIBs and we're good
i doubt it, hopefully they do tho
i heard beta in august
all rumors so far
guys give it to me straight will it be playble on a 1060 pr do i have to play it in my ps5
now no more labs reg?
driver support will be cut soon too
until its officially discontinued, labs is still active
I hope... last chance
theres one rn?
- its not Friday
- im not in it lol even if i were i couldnt tell you
why
The trailer song goes hard
turn off crosplay and im sure youll have a un time
very much yes
i just prefer playing on the device where i have everything
not that i hate console
i love watching youtube or using other apps while playing
when they mixed the BF theme in with the song, 🐐 'd
WE ARE SO BACK
True! 😎
WERE BACK BABYYYYYY
WE ARE BACKKKK
I'm hyped
Interesting reveal trailer.
@severe anvil will labs play testing continue on the side to test new features/dev builds?
How do I join? This is a stupid question but I really don’t know?
Yes we are
Is there another playtest?
Guys I’m stoked!!! I’m not pre ordering until I actually feel how the beta plays because that will be their closest to last build but holy shit! So much info in the trailer, it looked like mainly aimed towards the story but none the less I got bf3 vibes from it🔥🔥
Same!!! We are so back!!! Battlefield is back!!!
yeah trying the beta will be fun
hope we get access to whatever the open beta build is before open beta
What is that supposed to mean? Like a pre download?
Guessing they mean the labs people get the beta build before others
If so, then it's unlikely. They'll probably include a bonus for pre-orders where you get in early though
All info suggests the open beta happening really soon, sooner than what a preorder bonus would give out
I keep hearing August 4th
The 4th is a Monday, no one releases things on mondays
a ok makes sense, i personally hate console because i have to pay for a subscription just to play
Trailer looking always the same.
BF 3/4 Campain Trailer were immersive
The open beta update is being added to labs august 4th. They are def not releasing it the 4th though, so my bet is the 8th or 9th
i yeah thag too dude i forgot
It’s been so long they haven’t brought back the B52 bomber since it appeared back in BF4. I hope they bring it back in BF6
How do you know?
THIS
from an ex console player
switching to pc was the best move ever
Data Divers from the alpha found it in the code
ikr
It's also a monday. No sane game producer is going to launch their open beta on a monday
You say that but is is EA, are they really that sane?
... fair
😂
They did greenlight 2042's launch
...... Yep
i'm honestly so ready for them to somehow fumble this game
like they always seem to do in some way
5 or 6 man squads? Thoughts??
5 with the commander call-ins from the squad leader (which I'd prefer), 6 without
What about the perks? Squad perks with depending on the leader of squad may vary
Or by map
What about HZ with a BR ~ Tarksrov blenf to it??🤔🤔
Most defintlely theyll be strike maps for the smaller plsyer count
br is the last thing i care about for this new bf
I love how we were complaining about lack of vehicles and in the trailer they had nothing but vehicles almost too much vehicles, like a “FINE, IS THAT ENOUGH VEHICLES FOR YOU”😂
also that was the story trailer
Yes of course
so no that has nothing to do with mp
But still funny
lets just hope
Yeah it does because everyone was complaining about lack of vehicles in the labs and the trailer confirmed tons of vehicles that will be in the game from transport to attack
that the game isnt like bf2042
Of course it won’t be 6 helicopters on one map
labs was a very bad experience anyway, crashed like more than a dozen times for me
But it’s still confirming that there is a nice variety of vehicles!
I agree I didn’t like it
But let’s hope this beta slaps!!
i hope labs doesent represent the end product
Definitely not labs was prolly 10 percent of what were actually getting no way they showed us their whole game in labs
They will use campaign assets in the multiplayer
ohh really?
i thought they made 4 different abrahams models just for br, mp, tdm and story
like what is bro yapping
ofc they will reuse assets
one issue in labs is that most gameplay elements that you were aupposed to test didnt work, which was so stupid, why even have these alpha tests if i:
1: cannot give feedback
2: not play the game properly because of crashes
hope pts will be done better than labs
no
no?
there was never anything like this
dont provoke anyone to break nda, you make me mad
no shit anything else smart ass, there is mo discord to discuss labs
Then you weren't a tester
wtf yes i was
Well not a 'true' one according to EA
If you were part of the very public stress test they did awhile back
Things break in a pre release build! It happens!
You weren't a tester
no we had this discussion alreaey
I also miss the ammo caches at flag points in BF5 that were not in BF 2042. Would be nice to have ammo caches at control points again
These were the people they invited 
in the invite email there was no link to a seperate server to give feedback
if there would be i would be the first person to give feedback
Your invite was time limited, but your NDA wasnt
total confirmed it somewhere, I'm trying to find it
he really should've pinned it
Like what LOL.
ok so i only was invited for the 72h one that was supposed to hype up bf players?
The N in NDA stands for NON, BTW
Changes they made with the Labs made the game worse 
En de ay
I was but never got to play it, had pneumonia at time of appointment.
@vestal berry never played, any chance I can get access anyway?
72hr playtest was a stress test for servers
Cry about it bro seriously, fucking cry about it
you should've read the email title, it probably said "stress test"
The feedback they wanted were to their servers they wanted to break.
You were invited to test server stability, not for feedback
They are literally getting testers. To break their game. That is the purpose of it LOL
Movement nerfs, removal of assault's medpen all stem from labs testing 🥶
pointless
yeah my latest rig is great....when it allows me to play 2042 which is the only title I cannot play on it, got laptop with 12450HandMobile3060Tho
Just cos youre annoyed/angry, at not getting a full labs invite, doesnt mean it was pointless
bro is seriously complaining after he was given free access to play as much as he wanted for days
Entitlement is unreal
it was pointless
Why are so many of you worried about other people holy shit if that was the case half these people including myself would be removed from this discord for talking about it in general even if we don’t state we were in it we’re still talking about it lmao shut up already
No U
ok so when your game full shuts off your pc, is that good for the components health of your pc?
Wether or not this was their plan they are obviously listening to people
Well would have you been happier if you never got invited even for that in the first place?
If I wouldn't been sick...I would have played until I dropped...
And because of my situation that can still now take up to 5 days consecutively
That’s what matters
Does it suck that it was broken in some ways? Yes.
But you should have expected that from a pre alpha build.
does dice provide me with a new 5090 in a few years no, dont make random people stress test their own machines for your games
Me when I make things up cos im angry and trying to make a point
damn, horrible timing. My condolences 

Boohoo
what angry, the labs version we played all it did was crash
Like what then dont sign up LMAO
there was no testing to be done of aynthing
It's voluntary. Not mandatory for you or anyone to test.
you should be grateful that you even got to play the stress test lol, its an experience within itself
Thanks for your understanding.
It was clearly working for others goofy
and then you werent allowed to give feedback
maybe that was the entire test dumdum
what a waste of everyones time participating
the data they needed they collected themselves
Sounds like its a good thing they tested that version then bud. Seems like they resolved that issue, cos youre the only person to ever mention it.
This is hilarious. Absolutely illogical you actual child.
not all games get automatic crash reports but if it helped im happy
rex would you be able to tell me which ones dont
but labs wasnt advertised as a stress testing thing, but to test core features of the game
👂
lying now are we?
the Finals
He clearly didn't read his emails to give feedback if he was actually a part of Battlefield Labs.
Re-Read your email bud
💀
I always opt in fully, cookies I fully decline 99.99% of times
Do you understand the purpose of a pre release build
Answer me this batman.
The Open Beta will be here soon enough.
the finals doesnt send ue5 crash reports automatically you have to accept it when the game crashes
the more they talk, the more im glad they werent invited as a full tester. Imagine having to listen to this as a dev in a feedback channel
Will he answer me question
this is some insane mental gymnastics to save face
man battlefield players are just another league of stupid
Likely 15Th of August during Gamescom where +325K people wil attend.
Sounds like he's yelling in an echo chamber. 🤣
I dont understand how someone can be this entitled.
Gamescom starts on the 20th
like they cant read they cant see they cant hear they come to random conclusions they overreact on everything
They dont even respond they just rant.
right
all traits of a classic Gamer™
"let the fans design Battlefield. It is guaranteed to do well, they know what everyone actually wants"
The fans:
so up until now labs has been going on
It could be sooner. Could be the same day or days after the multiplayer announcement.
Keep in mind he thought that development started in March. Which makes zero sense.
yep
lets keep in mind that support has defib and lmg
He is clearly gloating himsèlf 😄 😜 Greetz from 🇳🇱
HGAHAHA
yeah totally
and people havent given freebqck on it
bfbc2 had a class with lmg and defib
Dude, I'm trying to help you but you need to chill a little. People here are nice and help each other.
Can you substantiate the issue. Can you answer a single question.
march-april-may-june-july-august, so pretty much a finished product in 5 months
What is bad with lmg medic.
not really, everytime im here we discuss how apparently open classes are better than closed ones
That is NOT solely a medic related issue, like infinite health.
why does it matter what gun they have
Support has supply crate
what difference does it make
its more like we are pointing out flawed arguments for locked classes
will you care that they have an lmg when you play against them like what
why does it matter if the game has classes?
classes are there to make categories for different roles
guns dont define the role of a player
its the gadgets that define the role
That's good to have those discussions. I'm just trying to point you where you can provide additional feedback but I can't help if you're not willing to receive the help.
an smg player without assault kit is just an smg player, lmg without support kit is just an lmg player
yeah so why not give a role to the class that has a different weapon so there are different resona to take that weapon and not just a different gadget
and vice versa
because you dont select a class based on weapons you select a class based on its kit
BF4 system they are implementing will make gun classes more useless than open system of 2042
and the wepaon is part of its kit
it doesnt make a difference on what gun you play because you approach each gunfight the exact same way as any other weapon in the game
BF sub downvoting me when I say I don't want to be forced to use an lmg to be medic (apparantly I'm a 'dumbass' and should actually 'play properly' and the blame is entirely on me)

Use carbine and break game. Yes.
Remember that this guy is adamant that BF6 only started development in March of 2025 when talking to them
im so curious to see if people will cry over the hybrid system
because then we can truly see the true colors of those "battlefield veterans"
BF4 devolved into AR/Carbine meta due to class locks. SMGs were entirely useless in the modes they would be useful in due to them being locked to engineers. Which would give much needed variety to the game.
in what range it attacks, what gadgets it has, what role it plays, if guns arent locked to a class, there is even less incentive to even have classes in the first place, and people obvioulsy want classes hence what happend with bf2042
and this stupid ahh conversation everytime 🥀
Thankfully signatures are in the beta
It's what testing is for. Weapon balance will go on for awhile even after game release. It's been this way for all Battlefield games. It's just an evolution over time. We just hope there's not that one broken weapon on release.
regardless of the gun that you have, you will always win gunfights not by a weapon difference but by being the better player and positioning better, timing better, having better angles, better peeks
I hope we get open system tbh
It literally won't matter either way tho, so whatever. Open or closed it will all be fine.
no shit and very unreleated to the topic of classes
Cant believe months later you're still flexing about this channel like a 12 years old lmaoo
What channel?
the only thing you need to know when approaching someone is quite literally the class they play which is semi irrelevant anyway unless theres some very hard counter gadget for specific plays
I guess you missed the Tweet. There will be open and closed weapon playlists in the open Beta.
and no some weapons have higher advantages in like range and damage in those ranges
I'm talking about full release
I hope we will get open classes in final release
wdym no shit when you just told me that guns matter more in gunfight than your own skill level 💀
Why does this weirdo only pop up to insult people randomly
I'm sure it will be the same as well.
yeah but it doesnt matter if youre having an advantage over that player
so a shootgun from 3m away is worse than a lmg?
Where's the insult? That's your friend zeethos
Who?
a shotgun in a 3m range against a positioned player is indeed worse than an lmg yes
because he's an idiot
and from 500m away a pistol will win against a sniper
because you cant hit full pellets on the player thats behind cover meaning you cant do full damage to the player

I guess you. I don't know this person tho lol
thats not a positional advantage
no one plays against a sniper from 500m away
even snipers dont play at a 500m range
what even is bro yapping at this point ofc some weapons are more potent in different scenarios its not just about skill
it is
Its a surprise you are engaging with it at all considering how evasive you have been.
we could 1v1 rn give me like pieper and you can play anni and ill 9/10 times win
he's some bad that can never argue his point so I've bullied him so hard to the point that he only responds to bait people
ragebait
anything else?
Been months you're yapping about this tester discord even in my private messages you reached out to me about it, if you believe they consider you, or it makes you, somehow important you're a delusional teenager
Do not play stupid. You have not answered my questions.

shut up
a good player will always play a worse gun better than a bad player will play a good weapon
im talking with a pickle bro
Yeah I had them blocked. No clue why, I guess they are one of those people who change their name and avatar every other week.
Weak.
?
Yeah you're the superior being that bullies people. Somehow you're widely regarded as the server idiot though. If you're the only one who can't keep up a discussion with me it's your fault. I had a splendid one just yesterday night with a fella here.
?
the sentence makes no sense so i will just stop with you pickle
good player with bad gun is better than bad player with good gun
but you do understand my point?
no
some weapons are better for certain scenarios
It makes sense, just isn't structured well.
Good player with worst gun will beat bad player with best gun
sure
but its irrelevant if the other player has a better position on you, better timing, better peek and or better angle, not to mention element of surprise
right so your argument is just be better, which doesent make much sense when the player in question is 500m away and you have a shootgun, its not always possible to "be better with what you have"
the only time when the difference between a weapon matters is in a point blank pure reaction time scenario but it doesnt really happen
Thats an example btw
why are you trying to engage from 500m?
never
im not going to engage anyone at 500m anyway
even with a bolt action, that's a dumbass range
Who's sitting from 500 metres away
but this mfer keeps bringing up some stupid point for the sake of arguemtn about closed classes
someone the other day in the 2042 channel said they were trying to use ARs at those types of ranges
absolutely bonkers
By the way I am just saying games are so easily exploited no matter what you do. I will farm with the m27 iar on support purely to make people mad.
Well in 42 they're all laser guns so worth a try
It is an assault rifle for support.
thats 1) 2042 bad map designs 2) hyper ape mode battlefield players that actually think of things like that
We get a dope trailer today and mfers are in here YAPPING about anything lmao
nothing else to talk about
There are people that want to argue to no end about the open and closed weapon system. The developers decided they're doing both. I think it will all come down to how many players actually choose it in the open Beta. They're trying to cater to both sides of the argument.
Personally I prefer a closed weapon system because it provides readability on the battlefield and a balance like in Battlefield 4.
I won't argue at the end of time about it.
There are two Discord users I've blocked on here because they refuse to be open minded and want to force people to like their opinion.
See you on the Battlefield buddy. 🫡
i just want bf6 open beta alr so i can play a better game than 1,5,2042 for a week
i will most definitely not miss gas from bf1
or sweetspot, or suppression
cant wait to just put that garbage game away
what readability in BF4? Anyone could run a carbine or dmr
no more unavoidable grenades
Now zeethos will text you about how active and healthy that game is
I could run across a support and not know if he's using lmg, carbine, dmr, shotgun
It's definitely a way to get the developers to notice an over powering weapon. You can't help things might not be properly tested.
Actually I would like to say. It was really nice playing the bf3 mode and from a glance immediately understand capabilities of the person you are fighting.
Keep in mind the m27 iar wont be overpowered it will just be "good" because it'll do its job.
you measure the capabilities by the class not by the weapon
ya so either lock it down like BF3, 1 or V. Or open it up because BF4's hybrid system is basically just an open system
Carbines and the m27 iar I will theorise be supports main guns
bf3 was hybrid too
I guess I played BF4 for thousands of hours I started to notice. In 2042 it was all over the place.
Absolutely. Ironically though when I would shoot at a support the thought "they cannot kill me AS well as I can kill them" goes through my mind.
So play 2042 for a thousand hours and realize it didn't matter
just like it didn't in BF4
Keep in mind I am for either system. I dont care. I want an open system to make the redditors seethe.
In all honesty I believe everyone gun in Battlefield needs to be op,
Nerf a gun just causes problems
I think theres an actual argument to be made.
In Italy we have a say about a man who cuts his own manhood to piss the wife off
I'm too autistic to think about that in the moment honestly
wtf?
the only reason why 1 and 5 werent the way 3,4 and 2025 was because of its timeline and even then bf1 had universal weapons which were kind of slipped into the overall kit, people like to complain about support having bolt action rifles if open class for example, bf1 had general liu which was identical to g98 in stats, bf5 had several carbines that were 2 body 1 head, there were hybrid weapons in support class of bf1 such as burton which was a smg type weapon, parabellum and so on so forth
Means it's not worth damaging yourself as well just to piss others off
ahh yes very wise
Oh trust me I have my own fucky wuckys
in bf5 assault you have smg type weapons too interms of damage fall off and ttk
Hhh i said that x)
bf1 wouldve been very barebones if they didnt use a bunch of experimental weapons or 3 variants of the same gun
universal weapons have always been a thing they were just more hidden into the classes with bf1 and 5
bf4 would've been barebones if like 4 guns per class didn't have copy pasted stats lol
fr
ngl you could argue that having nearly same statistical ttk for every weapon but making them feel different is better balanced than a wide range of different ttks
In reality majority of the Soldiers would be using rifles and one medic per squad
Bf 1 gun balance was good till they added the last ones which were broken, but what's important is the balance in the first years of life obviously years and years later every game will have a stable meta
talked on reddit pretty recently about it actually sec
To be honest the more I played bf5 and everyone having super capable weapons the less the actual class mattered.
So in terms of Class Macro balance one can say the game is relatively okay with a few notable outliers.
That said in most Battlefield (modern Battlefield games) gunplay is usually defined by its micro aspects. Most modern titles due to their nature had bare minimum fully automatic Assault Rifles available to a class turning the balance into a matter of numbers.
So in these cases balance is most commonly defined by how bad the outliers are and how evenly balanced the pack is. In an ideal balanced game, you want the outliers to be minorly better, and the rest of the weapons to be very close together. In short the closer the average TTK is, to the best TTK, the better balanced the game is.
Honestly my only gripe with BF5 aside from the cheaters was the in game credit which yes it was obvious why the gave you so little
Reminds me of my own statement i say.
that would ideally be better
Bf 5 gets too much hate imo lol
A meta happens no matter what the best thing you can do is make everything else up around it.
nah
yes
Bar and fg42 was my favourite dynamic.
meta is unavoidable, but its never been an issue in battlefield games
It's a first step downhill but it's not wasted money feel me
Bar ruined people but the fg42 had so much accuracy.
no one really knows about meta in battlefield
I'll be honest i disagree with that. About the issue part. Cause OCE. -.-
So does BF2042
oce is a more dead region ingeneral, more better players couped up together
Nope. 42 deserves it.
atleast definitive edition exists now 
Vhx, rm, etc. BUT.
Battlefield is such a varied game that allows for a variety of playstyles and players you can make things work even if they are "bad"
100%
it never mattered, i can go into bf1 and dominate the game with a c96 carbine or something lol
Well then BF5 deserves, because they were both on the same boat of problems at the time
meta is only a thing that matters if youre playing against good players in a competitive game
Which is where my point of view comes from
also another thing that annoys me
I disagree. 42 has way bigger problems than 5. Just think about the corpses flying like dolls when you die. It's a subpar game.
There is a higher chance of fighting a good player there so switching to that good gun needs to be ready in mind.
Did you ever use the fg42, pickle?
i talk here about the closed or open class system and people that are for the open system all they can do is argue that: "nostalgia from past games etc"
and thats also purely because the difference between good players is quite literally a very small difference and a difference of a weapon matters more in that instance than the difference in skill
I loved that gun to bits and would stand toe to toe because it was amazing.
The sentimental arguments get really tiring.
Yeah I also got called boomer a lot by people older than me
because you have yet to provide any argument for locked system that isn't hypothetical or pure fantasy
even tho universally the last game that has a open class system being 42 is universally hated across the dommunity
I agree with that. About nostalgia from the past.
Many did you simply ignore them because its easier to pretend to be smarter and different from the mass
and the game everyone loves being bf3/bf4 dont have that
I have not even seen a "proper" argument for locked weapons.
99% of the examples people give don't happen in the game where weapons are already unlocked
Neither
it doesent need a proper Argument
bruh
Yeah but if theres no proper argument against open weapons then theres 0 reason to entirely dismiss the idea of having open weapons
little class identitiy
He's right. Unlocked needs an argument to back it up. Because so far the biggest L Dice took is their only game with a open system.
THATS WHAT I MEAN
Class identity is set by the kit of the player meaning the gadgets, not by the weapon that someone plays
History backs it up for locked.
give this man server admin
If i pick general liu in battlefield 1 im still a medic player because thats what my role is
i use engineer as the anti tank class, not the smg/lmg/carbine/shotgun/dmr or whatever the game im playing has chosen class
I dont become a scout player purely because my weapon is a bolt action
Thats not my role to play
saying your role is the weapon you play says a lot about how you play
He doesnt even play the game if he thinks thats true
but i already knew that since people kindly have their gamertags connected to their discord
What are his stats
which game?
and i also know that the locked weapon playlist will have a lot of easy kills
all the BF boomers moving like they're in mud and PIEing every corner
Im going to have easy kills regardless it doesnt really matter
bro wants another 2042
wait until you learn I was jump peaking and jump shooting in BF3
At least you are not me, I only become the recon class when my team doesn’t want to put in the effort to capturing the objectives and getting kills instead