#battlefield-labs-discussion
1 messages · Page 94 of 1
yeah
One thing I would like them to bring from 2042 however, is the attachment system, I kinda liked being able to swap out on the fly, although it was kinda broken in some instances
the only thing that wasnt very well implemented was that you could have different ammo types so you didnt really run out of ammo
but i dont think the + system will return
Oh, I doubt it as well, but it was fun and unique.
But being able to sway from a bipod and long scope, to short scope and grip made for interesting gameplay
It kinda the opposite of attrition but
That game kinda the opposite of everything lol
It’s closer to 2042 than BF4.
And the person you’re talking about was specifically talking about the class structure between 6 and 2042 being identical
Oh wow, they went back to BF3/4 vehicle selection from the spawn screen, must mean we’re getting BF4 again
The only people saying bf4 is the closest comparison are lemmings that haven’t touched it and see a modern setting again
Keep trolling
Which is objectively wrong, but you're just a troll, so you dont understand
I want tanks do hit kill to infantry with there large calibre cannons 😒
Play hardcore if you want an abyssmal experience
BF 3 and 4 tanks do it hit kill with large calibre cannons on normal mode looool now they only do 60% damage and get destroyed with 2 rockets looool
If you're talking about the next game the balance isn't done yet
When have tanks not killed infantry when direct hitting?
He probably saw a leak where someone didn't die from the splash damage
Just read through the "class" system. Why are we always reinventing the damn wheel when we know for a fact what has, historically, worked and made people happy? Genuine question.
how are they reinventing the wheel? everything they're doing has been done before
I've never seen it done that way and I've played since Bad Company. But OK
we've had:
- open weapons
- field upgrades/perks
- call ins
- weapon proficiencies tied to classes
- Its BF3/4 esqe but more steps
not really
It's a mix of 2042 classes (assault being anti infy, engi, support being medic/ammo, and recon) with BFV subclasses
and unlocked weapons with weapon proficiencies (2042)
BF3/4 classes were
- Assault being medic + Underbarrels
- Engineer
- Support being ammo and cheese gadgets
- Recon
And then field upgrades (as they were called before) were just groups of perks you select
We'll see...
"Assault - Adrenaline Injector. We’re equipping the Assault class with an Adrenaline Injector that grants resistance to flash and stun effects, enhances sprint speed, reduces explosive damage, and amplifies enemy footsteps for a brief period."
okay... it's a new gadget
Yeah, that stuff has totally been in games before
Every BF has made changes so the classes fit with the rest of the gameplay and what modern gamers want.
we've always gotten new gadgets
autoinjectors were in BF2 and BC1 (tho they were healing and not whatever BF6 is)
Every BF game does something different with classes
If anyone here has advanced knowledge of this Secure Boot thing msg me lol. Im at my wits end of trying things I cannot figure out the issue I'm running into. I've legit tried everything, flashed latest bios, fresh windows install, enabled all the proper secure boot features for my motherboard, tried clearing and installing new secure boot keys, my drives are all GPT, etc.. lol

Wohoo maybe bf6 will do something different then instead of copy and pasting lazy weapon proficiencies from 2042
as opposed to copying BF4 like most of you are asking for?
I still want class exclusive weapons but DICE seems pretty set in stone on not doing that, so the best we can hope for if they don't go back to locked weapons is for them to be balanced well
well if you insist on simply copying, then why not do it from the more popular franchises?
ive said, I am perfectly happy with locked or unlocked, as long as they comit and try to do it well, but these weapon class buffs are just a poo approach
I'd rather have class buffs for their respective weapons than not honestly, it gives incentives for the player to commit to the role of the class they want to play
IDK either, brother. I have a pre-built PC that put my own GPU/CPU in and literally don't have the option to turn it on. I was hoping to wait and see whats up.
Try verifying game files
class roles are more defined by their gadgets tho, I would give them unique attachments for their "appropriate" weapon classes that they can choose to use to further support their classes role instead of gimping the whole weapon category for anyone who isnt that class
Nah it’s not that, when I enable it in bios and my pc boots back up my mouse, keyboard, and usb devices don’t work lol. I’ve looked it up and it says the devices might not be “signed” so I tried a few things but nothing works it’s mad annoying lol
Sounds weird. Booting with USB unplugged and then plugging in afterwards don't work?
This entire issue would be solved if the weapons were just class exclusive in the first place, but since that's not the case, having buffs (that aren't really that much besides Recon which is compounded by the insanely powerful specializations) is pretty much the only option to give good incentive for a class to use that specific weapon.
I get you there but if they are going for a more sandbox approach and not locking weapons, then still trying to incentivise people to use a specific weapon seems counter productive
Tried that doesn’t work either lol
What brand mobo are you running
How do I get the battlefield labs files off my computer?
You can’t delete it? I just deleted it off my PS5…
Can you not uninstall the file manually?
Im stuck in matchmaking for minutes and then get disconnected error
theres always gamefile folders just delete the folder if you cant uninstall it seperately ig
....... You know that's not allowed right?
i dindt know, i delete just for precaution
? deleting gamefiles from your pc isnt allowed?
oh nvm
something else
Careful bro
Just wait for an open beta. Keep telling y'all.
Is there an open beta now?
No. Nothing announced yet. But from someone who's been on bf labs the process just to get in is a pain. It's not worth the hassle.
Game is fire. But bf labs and actually getting in is a headache.
they need to officially reveal the game, drop the NDA and open up Labs to everyone that had applied prior to the reveal date. Run it for more than the 2 hour play sessions they have been
Sounds like a beta
closed beta 
well it isn't too complicated, you just press a button and pray
Unless it's just the randomness of it all
I see no issues that will arise from opening labs up from a few thousand, to 1.3m users. 🤣
"scaling up over time" is a myth, just go ham from the start, nothing can go wrong 
Greetings! Due to circumstances I have missed the first alpha I got invited to. I have re-registered again. Is there a chance I get picked again ? Is there anyone who missed and got invited later ?
a chance yes, likely no
Hope they see my 3k+ hours across all games 😄
I hope they dial it back with the cosmetics on this one
There are like 500+ types of military uniforms across the world. IDK why they choose santa claus.. Even if they design a skin from ground up, atleast to be something you can actually see on a battlefield
because after so many different real world uniforms they all begin to look the same
yeah every well funded military looks pretty samey
can't they find a different way to monetize instead of skins? I feel like just buying DLC didn't hurt BF3 and BF4 in any way
Wellp, battlefield 4 had a ton of uniforms, and no one complained of lack of customisation 😄
it hurt the playerbase getting segregated
BF4 was 12 years ago, cosmetics weren't really a thing
the box has been opened, people like customizing their characters
people like playing dress up
also, I can pull up multiple pictures of american GIs dressed up in Santa gear
In actual combat ? 😄
is a game of conquest actual combat?
wdym
it's a video game, it's not real. having xmas themed skins for a holiday event has been a thing for 20 years
yea, but its a game aiming for realism
COD4 had a whole map redone with Christmas decorations and everyone loved that
Customization is cool but they should just stick to realistic clothing and gear, like in ARMA
the game I can get shot in the chest with a tank shell and get revived by a medic w/ some electricity?
There's already ARMA and other games that have strived for authenticity more so than BF available
😄 I guess there is no point in arguing with an elitist like you
me pointing out an arcadey game is arcadey equals elitism
what is the general consensus?
there is no general consensus
DICE hasn't surveyed the million of people who buy the game and published the findings
I think holiday skins are fine as long as they are only available on holidays or are simple color redos
I would rather not see Santa running around the map with an m4
I'd agree on having free useable holiday skins during holiday events that go away after the event ends. with more subtle skins(unlockable/purchaseable) related to the event persisting
battlefield has never been realistic 💀
For an FPS it is. Its not a milsim
maybe if you've only played cod in your life
Holiday festivities in games was always unmatched.
if BF6 doesn't have pumpkin heads for halloween I'm rioting
😄 Playing FPS since Delta Froce Task Force Dagger, I think ive seen more than COD but ok 😄
They never even released the Santa skin lol
such a simple change that adds so much and mixes it up for a couple weeks
especially with how many US based maps are rumored to be in this game.
I want my christmas in brooklyn Division 1 vibes in BF6 lmao
BF has a relatively realistic aesthetic
But it's not realistic gameplay wise in any way
this 👆
It can be under hardcore. Portal had some realistic gameplay servers
so can any game with custom rule sets

Oh yeah
1000% dmg and 1000% velocity is super realistic 
tweaking variables does not equal realistic systems
9mm 2 tapping someone from 200 metres... so realistic ...
More immersed than a submarine
1942 mentioned?
So we all agree it's battlefield so it should obviously be arcadey, but skins, weapons, gear should be realistic/appropriate for modern nato and whatever other faction conflict? But we're cool with silly skins on holidays or special occasions?
1 tapping*
And yeah, I don't think people understand between realistic aesthetic and realistic gameplay (arma)
no, I'm cool with "inauthentic" skins year around
not santa and his reindeer but there's a spectrum between boring ass uniforms from X country to Santa
Would be cool to have like some PMC stuff a la Wildlands
Bring back cops and robbers from hardline as skins 
it wouldn't hurt to have santa hats for the holiday period
I'm gonna be real arma ain't even that realistic unless you mod it
Does it include chow time and sleeping in a cot? Gotta have that ultra realism
you can't join this unit unless you partake in basic training
‘Press Z to prone’
Thank you drill sergeant, very cool
So the consensus is: Arcadey (like BF3 and BF4), using realistic costmetics with unique skins within reason to the theme?
sure
I hope the goofiest thing they add is like those airsoft skull masks, no weird glowing or cel shaded stuff please
what's the selling point as of now? Like bf4 has levelution, BfV had a shit of vehicles and vehicle customization + SL calling in artillery, 2042 has portal and tornados
gameplay wise
idk, game hasn't been revealed
it being a "return" to form probably
honestly battlefield doesn't need a gimmick to sell itself, the game just needs to be good at launch
That's true, like BF3
Idk how the launch for that was but that game didn't really have a gimmick, and it's definitely one of the best
it had nice graphics for the time
blue tint
bf4 looks like shit imo
everything is so shiny...
washed out, ugly colors. everything is just grey/brown
it would be cool if they add more vehicle variety like BFV did. Maybe in this one have like 6 different aircraft roles (air superiority, multirole, ground attack, bomber, SEAD/electronic warfare. And having multiple attack helicopters to choose from
yeah it's kind of a missed opportunity to not have multiple vehicles for each class
especially since the factions comprise of multiple nations
They should honestly just go to town on the variety of vehicles and gadgets
for what it was in its time it was pretty insane looking
graphically yes, visually no
BF3 had inferior graphics, way better to look at it and holds up better to this day (ironically in large part cuz of the blue filter)
Guys, I'm in the military and just got back from an underway on my ship recently. It was a month long, so please update me! Did I miss anything? Any news? Etc?
open weapons is the decision DICE has settled on
go read the recent blog, that's really the only news from the last month.
Tragic, i thought there'd be more. Open weapons isn't the direction most of the community wants to go, but I hope its a small detail that can be overlooked by them doing something way cooler or new to battlefield.
they're probably saving stuff for the big reveal
I imagine so. If there's one thing they excel at, its reveal trailers
im 100% certain that a lot of people wont care that its open
there's a new leaked 15min gameplay clip on the subreddit.
watch it and ask if you think unlocked weapons changes how much of a BF that plays like
people are very heavily overreacting on weapons
most the whiners are only whining cuz they're miserable and bored and as soon as they play the game they'll either forget or shutup about it
i understand why they want it
but im 100% certain that it just wont matter the way they think it does
because it's all they know and they can't divorce the fact that open weapons wasn't why 2042 failed?
It's open weapons but you're at a disadvantage if you don't use "class specific weapons" (like reduced accuracy)
the disadvantages arent really that big to the point that it matters
Is the 15 minute video a new build? I played labs back in like May I think, so
and you dont get disadvantages but you get advantages on using specific class of weapons
should be. menus/hud look updated
more map details, less texures missing like older builds
i dont think we are allowed to talk about leaks
what leaks? do I need to call my plumber
abbasid has proper colour grading now
imo hope they iterate on the scoreboard. 2042 got it right with showing revives | repairs/resupplies/heals
as their own columns
ironically 2042 ended up with the best scoreboard in the end
don't let anyone know that 2042 actually did do some things really well
something they need to fix is the helicopter physics. The 2042 helicopters feel extremely light and I feel it should feel more like bf4. It should require some skill too
nightbird infantry farmers 😐
siege apache apes
class signature gadgets are awesome

insane that the older games let you play medic without revive or heals
no no, that's class identity you're insulting there
me running assault in BF4 with no medpack/defibs was peak teamwork
siege attack heli goons ruin the fun
like my teammates would see me... an assault/medic and not know that I wasn't strapped like that
we need game readability
that's why kinda concerned about the current support set up
idk if the support is specced into being a medic or fire support ammo guy
becomes a bit more ambigious for revives
they could do what every MMO does, put the spec icon next to the class icon
at least in the squad ui element
that'd be cool
have any of the class specializations other than recon been shown/leaked. I know they were at the very beginning of labs but shit has obv changed
something about combining medic and support feels kind of cringe
idk, I like it. always a PITA finding an ammo crate outside (of meatgrinder chokepoints) of 2042 cuz no one wants to use LMGs
I think some of the perks got nerfed but that's about it
it's better than medic + assault imo but the ideal solution would be 5 classes
5 classes would be cool
I find with 4 classes gadgets always get handed out awkwardly
like recon gadgets since they've merged the sniper/spec ops class from BF2
yeah I feel like the spec op elements of recon are never really advertised much
there are better songs on that album
Oh yeah, then why don't all the armies play those instead?
not chud coded enough
I finally figured out the secure boot issue with my system if any fellow nerds out there care to hear about this insane debacle lmao
Go on!
Wonder where @real glade has been hiding...been almost a month now and my pockets still empty
So I went back to Windows, fresh install, flashed bios, etc. once I enabled secure boot my mouse and keyboard would not work. From all this reading and shit I’ve been doing I found out that every driver for all your devices need to be “signed” by Microsoft. So I downloaded TeamViewer on my phone and Pc, enabled secure boot and started Pc up. As always mouse and keyboard didn’t work so I remoted into my Pc on my phone and went to device manager. Noticed that my mouse and keyboard devices had errors and an unsigned driver so I uninstalled them, had to go into a REGEDIT path and delete .sys files, then restarted pc. Started back up and boom devices all had signed drivers and work lol. Just tested 2042 and got right in
So the input devices had exclamation marks on device manager always, or only after enabling secure boot?
Only when enabling secure boot. When I would go to device manager > mouse > HID-complaint mouse > properties > drivers > driver info it would show 3 total drivers, 2 of them were digitally signed by Microsoft but one of them wasn’t signed. So I uninstalled the devices and restarted
What brand are the devices?
Lamzu Atlantis mouse and huntsman pro mini
Weird, I have the Atlantis mini and never experienced that issue. Gotta love Windows man lol.
Yay drivers. -.-
Yeah I got the OG V2 lol. My Pc was prebuilt and it came using the “other os” type and “custom” boot rather than windows UEFI and standard so maybe that had something to do with it idk lol
Prebuilt? May be another cause of all that 
Nahh it’s from Powergpu they are goated. Jese is as legit as they come I handpicked all the parts I wanted it’s been flawless for 3 years up until this one little thing lol
never had a prebuilt so I don't know jack about companies 
I just don't trust any of them to not screw something up and rather select parts and build myself
I had the same thought process but I have a buddy who lives in NC and knows one of the dudes who work there and I’ve only ever seen good things so I went for it lol
I've heard power gpu are legit as far as pre-built goes.
They are great the owner is a stand up dude and customer support is top notch. Nicest dudes
Was about to ask John battlefield when the trailer was gonna drop this month
Yo hop off my meat bro
Like deadass you’re worrying about a grown ass man

When is the reveal dropping bro
In your ass
TDIL my ass is a moment in time
Bro will never pay up, or even own up. Lol
All my work in vein. I had hoped to retire from the payout. 😭 (it's all fun and jokes but let's not continue to harp on them and don't tag them when they're not active in chat, thanks).
Are there any upcoming tests or surveys one can anticipated in within the foreseeable future?
If you've signed up for Battlefield Labs and get selected you'll get info via email.
Nope, but he'll get salty about it though...
In vein? Whoa buddy lol. Jk jk lol
Me no type good
(also all English words sound the same but have different spelling and as a German I do not like it. Thanks for the correction. 🤣 )
Hey, it’s how we gatekeep our language
Hit you with 3 forms of one word that all sound exactly the same
GERMAN
Die der das
Introduce him to a bogan Aussie and have him question what’s really English
I cant do bogan cause im not a bogan!
If i leave a microphone in the shitty part of Sydney then i can get something!

I dont even live in Sydney which is funny.
Had a drinking game back when I played footie where we’d would play “name of Australian suburb/township or made up word”
DIE.
Rd. 1 - Whanregarwen
Redacted question regarding testing timing
have you been playing the other playtests since the may stress test?
that's your answer
no, I only got an email for the DATE REDACTED stress test, so I guess that is all I had access to? I got no communication regarding any other tests
that's your answer
Youre also probably gonna get muted for posting confidential info
You still have time to delete OG comment before a mod sees it
redacted it, sorry. Didn't realized the dates of a test was confidential.
Everything labs related, which isnt posted in a blog at #1335997362258186292 is confidential. At least you know now 😄
Careful guys
Where, wear, we're, were
There, their, there, they're
Win, when, won, one
Lol
Forgot the classic
You, your, you’re
Youandallofdem
When referring to someone and all their family lol
You all, y’all
Saying y’all can’t help but have me imagine a very strong American accent
I use it sometimes in text but saying it in person just isn’t right
You can say it without the heavy southern drawl lol
I’m actually super curious what it would sound like with various UK accents now
Anytime I hear or see the word "y'all" I think of Dolly Parton...cos my parents listened to her a lot when I was young.
you just got to come down to the American South, it is super normalized and in the vernacular here.
piano intro to 9 to 5 starts
Ty for informing me👍
I just end up saying it like 'yarl'. Which sounds awful when I'm saying it
fade into Skyrim intro
It’s the Viking blood and the need to appease the Jarls of old
My friend in the UK...when he tries to sound American, he sounds worse than most southern accents, which is funny as the southern accent (especially Georgia) is just a slowed down posh English accent lol
Keeps calling me a Yokel too, which is the funniest non offensive insult. Like that's the best you got? Lol
Isn’t a ton of southern ancestry directly from the kent region?
Like the southern settlers were from Kent cuz the English didn’t want them in England at the time
Been a while since I’ve looked up the etymology etc of colonial America
was going to put jarl as my pronunciation of it actually
Depends, Tennessee and Kentucky were almost Irish and Scottish immigrants, and you can still hear it. Texas is Czech, German, Irish and Scottish mixed with Spanish and Native
Ya talking Atlantic “south”. OG colonies
The Carolinas, Georgia, Florida yeah, heavy Kent and southern English
Take a person from Savanna, Georgia and speed up their speech and you'd think they were from the UK.
I’m sure this gets asked pretty often but if I previously received an invite for BF Labs, does that mean I’m eligible for future play tests as well?
How do I join to become like a beta tester?
You sign up on the BF Labs page
Still no code. Will the tests ever arrive in Italy? Or am I the only one who hasn't received the code?
99.99% of people wont get in
True
I sign up when the page first came out. haven’t had a chance to get in yet
Thank you
one of the first things they said here was that sign up order wouldn't matter
Where can we get technical support for labs?
Nothing is matter 🤡
honestly I don't even know if I did sign up or it bugged out when I tried earlier
This is instead of EA playtesting?
Yes.
please help me. I participated in the previous beta test of battlefield labs, but after it ended and the new one started, I can no longer access it through the EA library. The game has been removed from the library.
Is this normal or not?
It is normal. You were added for the stress test, which was for a limited time only.
As BSoD says, if you were only invited for the 72 hour playtest it was limited to that specific weekend. If you were part of a different test and now have lost access you would've been removed from testing due to a violation (i.e. NDA break, inappropraiate behavior during the test, etc.)
Thanks for clarifying here sir! Does the Labs team have plans to add additional players to the ongoing tests who were either part of the 72 hour playtest or not?
so basicly heres a finger up the bum now off you tot
We have invited new players for each of the tests but there were a ton of signups. It requires a bit of luck to get in.
We'd know if we lost access right? Just waiting for next playtest, i did the 72h one and havent had anything since but just cross my fingers every day
If you were only invited for the 72 hour test then you lost access immediately after that, yep. Invited to Labs are different.
Shiiieeet is that something different I need to sign up for?
If you haven't signed up here yet, then yes. https://www.ea.com/games/battlefield/battlefield-labs
more ?
when is the next test?
sounds like a mobile game
Tests are under NDA and are not discussed in the public Discord.
It would be better if there was a separate discord to talk about the labs.
Great idea.

Got it. Thank you so much @severe anvil
ngl sounds like something that should have been a thing since labs conception as to be able to pass feedback more safely without violating the NDA. lol

the sarcasm is lost
When is the next test? I always seem to miss them

Oceania servers pls
Antarctica servers pls
Moon server when?
subterranean server please
nevada test site server please
minsk servers please fr
Mars servers please, the lag is insane from here
Need to know the dates prior.
Moon server peak
Those server groups are too broad. 1 server for each local region in every country 
There is, for people who are only in Labs
I don't think so, because they would have sent it to whoever was selected

Almost like they did
💀
As far as I know EA, they wouldn't do that
you clearly don't know ea
there have been a bunch of leaks from within the labs discord, it's public information now
Oh wait you were serious
DICE should add double jumping to the game
Why stop at just two jumps?
Flying is really the way to go
teleportation even
hell, why even shoot things at this point
Double jumping, air dashing, wall bouncing, Super Battlefield 64 
Battlefield Cart 64. Just forget the rest 😄

"Now introducing ultra-realistic kart action! With the Circular DLC, you can experience the daring paths of a wide oval as you try to survive the bumps. Get in first or be left behind!"
they do NOT have discords for discussing pre-alpha playtests. It's gonna be in the EA forums if anythign
which is a terrible outdated platform they should have upgraded years ago, but I digress
They do
As mentioned before, the existence of it has been leaked many times
Sometimes accidentally from people in this server who think they can talk about it freely :/
There should be a thing where they make you read the entire nda and have you recite say the 14th line.
lol Doom49 deleted the photo of BF6 promo box... someone didn't read the letter
This channel in a nutshell
I mean I feel for the EA comms people, it's a bad industry to be in right now, it's a thankless job
Doesn't help when half of the creators you work with cannot read beyond a 5th grade level
The number of people who come here and just refuse to read is rather astonishing
gestures broadly that's gamers 🙂
He’s being transported to Azkaban as we speak
🫡
If you really believe EA trusted people there wouldn't be leaks and nda is actually a thing you're out of your minds. This whole playtest is just teasing. A marketing strategy to increase the hype. If you really believe EA was like "nobody will share videos 👍 " you have no idea about anything
Thousand of people accessed it atleast once, "closed" lol
Its basically a beta which gives you a false feeling of exclusivity and privilege, so is the discord
I once had that bsod dude texting me in pm "I know people" cut he had a friend in the discord thats how brainwashed they made u
Thats not true.
Announcements from devs in a discord have been leaked and its insinuating to there being a discord.
Public info at this point btw
what do you think closed means
the mental gymnastics people do are insane
ea would not waste this much time and effort faking playtests just for hype lmao
I'll say it again, the cynicism is making them actively dumber. the pretzel logic they have to twist themselves through to make a dumb point is bewildering
the Labs can be both things at once...
a testing environment for DICE to get real data outside of a controlled environment (in person playtesting using the same PC's on the same network)
and a gesture of goodwill to the community + free, word of mouth marketing
Obvious bait
When your country is not supported for invites 
No need for an invite tbh if Tom H.'s sources are correct 
He still has sources 
If It’s from Tom Henderson, then
it’s correct simple.
let me fix it: not-so-restricted
Yes buddy the whole discord is aware we are all dumb and you're intelligent
just knowing what i know this makes me laugh so hard lol
some people just aren't able to trust anything so they need to make some stuff up just for it to make sense in thier brains as, whoo everyone is lying to us lol
I don't doubt that EA is less strict about ndas because of marketing, but that's likely only because it got good feedback. If labs got bad feedback, they would've been a lot harsher with the punishments considering the fact that it's a legal contract that these people are breaking
And that would've shut many of the leakers up
Since they started promoting the game, I think a public alpha/beta is just around the corner.
Would be cool if they dropped a public beta right after the big event
It most definitely isn’t happening, but it’d be cool
I've not seen them promoting the game, where are people seeing this?
#battlefield-labs-discussion message
Since content creators got some promotional material already, it means, that soon ™️ EA will lift the embargo and we will see the material they've got. Most likely there will also be some official announcements (name reveal, maybe public beta, etc.).
When do they close the labs sign up?
they are still choosing people #battlefield-labs-discussion message
No
Sadge
(Apparently) people will be allowed to open them on the 24th
pfft they already opend them
The 31st is the reveal trailer also
Those creators also broke their NDA by posting that lol
crazy
Are invite communications largely coming thru email? Anyone know the alias that invites come from? Just want to make sure my spam filters don’t push it out
Yes, solely via email. playtesting@ea.com and I believe there's also eaplaytesting@e.ea.com.
Ty kind sir 🙇♂️
Enough talking about BF, let's start talking about getting you a GF
breaking embargo and then emailing your rep with the
🥺
👉 👈
Creators showcasing what dice sent them on the 24th
The trailer releasing the 31st
And then a possible open beta august 4th
They really are speeding up the hype train
EA casually announced open beta before the game's name itself, even they don't care at this point 
Beta could start as early as August 4th
Pre-order page and release date just leaked 🤭
they did?
not going to link to it here, but it appears so
Can you DM me 
no sorry
Then ur lying
Ya it’s not on Reddit and that would’ve been plastered all over it
would be all over twitter if it was true
I keep telling y’all, dumbest fanbase in gaming
BF6 is a sign of confidence rather imo, if it was just BF and it was a reboot then I would say they aren't confident
No it’s leaked on Reddit
100 million people must play
BF6 = Mainline, next installment 
BF = We are rebooting, pwease play our game 
I’m ngl it doesn’t even matter, BF6 just looks like a better version of 2042.
where
no no no it's not Skate 4 it's just skate.
i dont use that tbh
Skate: Reborn
That’s a low bar however
send it me tho?
That’s not a good thing imo
hopefully it turns out good, looks good so far
Maybe it shouldn’t be like 42 at all
dont think it will be
Depends
Imo 2042 would’ve been fine if the changes they did to make 6 were done to it
- no specialists
- no 128 players
- no obnoxiously large maps
- more realism
- more class play
tbh yeah those were like the biggest complaints people had
And, of course, no big game-breaking bugs
Name it Battlefield 6 > everyone continues to call it bf6 and it’s seen as a return to the 2,3,4 style naming
Name it Battlefield > everyone just calls it BF2025 and it’s seen as a poor attempt at rebooting the series without even rebooting the series or story (iirc it’s still set in the 4 and 2042 timeline)
I hope it's set in 4,2042 timeline
We might get 2143 one day since it's also connected 
@severe anvil When it comes to criticizing, everyone criticizes, but when it comes to praising, few praise. I was one who criticized and still criticizes Dice's decision to unlock weapons, but with today's announcement of making both modes available, it was an incredible decision. We'll see which one will be the community's favorite. Congratulations. 
I’m pretty sure there’s something in 2042’s logs thing that talks about a large war between NATO and a pmc
Had a weird dream they brought back the AC130 from 4…oh what a dream
Lock classes HELL F*CKING YES
It's not locked
ITS BOTH
Worst of both worlds
what ever man
Ok
best of both worlds
I’m telling ya, when most people in the beta play with open weapons, it’s going to be an all time crash out for the vocal minority. While most people realize that their locked weapons really isn’t what made their favorite game what it was
Fr
Fr
Well we will see, I would support locked weapons if they were truly locked like BF1-V but if you are going to make it as open as BF4 might as well completely make it open, signature weapons already gets a buff if you use them with their classes
i prefer open tbf
Play tests open every friday right?
nobody knows
If should say, just check in every day
playtests are under NDA and are only announced to the playtesters.
@severe anvil i never get notifications or announcements for my self though
Well if you're not a playtester you wouldn't get the notifications.
I am
brother it's all in your email
whitelist the playtest email / add it as a contact so it doesn't go to spam
I looked through all my emails, I think they messed up sending it to me
Did you participate in the 72 hour stress test? While Battlefield Labs participants were also playing during that, it was a separate stress test that didn't give access to Battlefield Labs.
I did and I "played" a short 2 hour test 2 weeks ago
How did you get the info about that test then? 😄
I'm gonna call this one a "skill issue"
When I first signed up, it told me when the 72 hour was and the 2 hour test. I was just very lucky to top on labs when it was active.
What is the "it" that told you? I assume your email? Then you should make sure you read all the emails and check your junk folder for more info.
if you have an email, there's a playtest. If you don't have an email, there's not a playtest
Ah junk mail folder, I feel like a goober lol
rookie error damn
Imo that depends on how they do it
If it’s automatically one and you have to turn a setting on to play the other, the automatic one will win 100% of the time because gamers are lazy
If it’s just two buttons next to each other, I feel like locked weapons will win purely do to the public consensus that locked weapons = bf
I’d prefer for both to stay. Idc about “splitting the community”
The balancing would be 2x harder though, so I can see why they wouldn’t keep them both
So what exactly is the reason people hate the open weapons? I personally like the idea so I can play the game my way
I think the idea is that you play into a particular role by restricting everything in the class, I think it’s less boring
open weapons allows anyone to pick any class
Can’t rly be done if you only incentivize
carrot / stick game design
classes are gadget based, cant use every gadget in every class
same difference, usually locking a primary is more of a motivator than a gadget
From what I can tell, it’s a mix of “every game besides the worst bf game in history had locked weapons” and the belief that it’s a mix of both weapons and gadgets that make up a class instead of just gadgets
Class would include everything in your disposal even including what you appear as
i prefer tight classes with specific roles and situations they thrive in, including weapon advantages and limitations. I also prefer the predictability of knowing what weapons to expect when facing a certain class. If you're pushing a recon you know they'll suffer at close range, if you're shooting at an engineer/medic you know they'll struggle at range, etc
I think the issue that people have with open weapons is the fact they dont want to see assault support and engineers with snipers. They can improve on the classes and make gadgets more useful. If people are worried about not playing the objective they could had a bonus score multiplier for playing objectives as a team and squad where players would only get the bonus by being in the objective area
I would agree to that but as someone who plays medic i dont want to be stuck with lmgs, i didnt like it in bc2
Sniper engineers are fun ngl
i would also not like medic to be stuck with lmgs
The average gamer doesn’t associate either locked or unlocked to BF
Imo open weapons can work, but it’d be better pr-wise to say “hey, we listened unlike with 2042”
personally i wouldn't have medic as its own class anyway but i understand the assault problem
Recon is still the best sniper class due to spawn beacon anyways
I think most people would agree that not making the classes more useful is the real problem
Sniper in the best sniper class cuz of the sniper perks
I feel that the classes are watered down and dont force teamwork
Reduced healing on body shots and no revives on headshots lmao
Nah, I mean even in 2042, if you use Falck sniper and you die you have to go back to that position while recon can just spawn in there
There is no sniper class. It’s called recon☝️🤓
Sorry dad
I hate the fact there was only one box that gave both meds and ammo, thats laziness
Why, one less box to worry about finding because teammates never drop that shit other than for themselves
Would that define the support class more
it should either be meds or ammo, not both....... medics heal support gives ammo
Ye support by providing meds and ammo aswell as cover fire/suppression with lmgs, I mean pretty sure that’s what they’re going for anyways
other than bc2 support was always ammo and assault was always medic other than bf2 and 1942 and 2142
Combining both ammo and heals is a good change, support historically had low pick rates due to ammo not being essential
Even in BFV I would rather have 0 ammo for my primary but have 1 med pouch on me
thats why i liked the attrition system in bfv
Ironically assault looks to be more like assault now than a mix
Well even in BFV it's not that important lol
Yeah. It’s far more common to die before you run out of ammo
Cuz it was nerfed anyways lmao
Also, supports in BF6 don’t have to choose supply crate, you can get one running offensive gadgets like mortar/airburst
Apparently teamwork can be too much
it is for those that dont die much and run out of ammo
So, an all in one crate is way more reliable for everyone else on the team
You only run out of ammo if you are using LMGs for suppressive fire
Every other class can get half a mag from a dead enemy
Who runs out of ammo in BFV? Run over a dead body or hit a resupply station
i ran out of ammo killing people lol
Well we don’t even know the situation with attrition rn
Non existent for infantry afaik
medics are useless with health regen and according to @nimble bridge support is useless because there is too much ammo
Support change is good imo overall, one crate for both health and ammo, assault should've been dedicated infantry farmer class but they decided to take away medpen's healing capabilities 😂 They should revert that back immediately because no one will use assault
Medics are incredibly useful in every BF game, support isn't, which is why that change is good
or move medic to assault class
Best weapons and best gadget in one class?
always been that way bf3 bf4 bf2 bfv bf1
not really, if you have good squad members you would be hard to stop
most people play recon lol
Not at all
What were the best gadgets in BFV and BF1?
Medic's infinite self heal of course
If it has a balanced cooldown or must be replenished like rocket launcher ammo, then I’d be fine with it
Closed weapons does kinda solve this issue though since it’d mean assault would have the best weapons but mediocre gadgets
Assault will be worse than an engineer or a support even with locked weapons
And what were the best weapons? In BF1 and BFV?
fliegerfaust and c4 bf1
Zero chance with the leaked assault spec talents
Carbines are open for everyone, might as well use support with a carbine with infinite self heal instead of an assault with an AR
or just open weapons up so i can cod no scope as support lol
Good point
Support snipers are useless anyways, lacks the spawn beacon of recon
The fact that carbines even exist make me think that the original plan was locked weapons. Or, at least, a test for locked weapons
There’s no need for carbines in an open system when they’re basically just a bad in-between of ARs and SMGs
That was pre medpen nerf, we don't know the current assault perks, if assault lacks self healing it will be most useless class
support class with one crate that drops ammo and meds = op class when someone wants to camp
Recon sniper hits support sniper with a body shot… support sniper can no longer heal
Then kills that support, so that support has to go back to his camping position
Instead of spawning on spawn beacon
They’ll most likely be good thou, good way to incentivize team play lol
In either system, engineer hits sniper with rocket. Both snipers die
support player with unlimited ammo/meds + c4 or claymores =op
Pretty sure it was faster sprint-to-aim speed or something
Unless you’re talking about something else
Support will be OP unless they gave assault's medpen back
I can’t wait to see how people’s opinions change when they actually play the game in the open beta
Perhaps the map design enables that
I never played in pre alpha so I have no idea how it will feel like
But idk
If it's bad I will dunk on it though 😂
I think it should feel intuitive thou like in bfv maybe
I like how slide transitions seamlessly into crouch sprint, doesn’t rly make sense to not do that.
lowkey im actually excited for the battleroyal
From the leaked footage I've seen the movement looks like BF1 but with even more reticle sway. Any movement and your sight misaligns like crazy.
Guess enough people sent in mail to DICE about getting schmooved on in 2042.
it felt way too slow
Doubt many of em even played 2042
from what i saw i couldnt tell difference between sprinting and normal running
What if they copied Halo Infinite's sprint and made it only 10% faster than walking 😂
It probably is only marginally faster
I hope we can give feedback on it after the beta ends.
i doubt they will see it
I never gave feedback for previous BF betas but I will for this one.
I hope people give feedback now in the alpha about it being too slow
Not if they give us a survey though
im hoping this game wont flop, but the track record says otherwise
inshallah we will hit 100 million player
people shouldnt look at past games imo, past is the past. completely new game
Huh?
Same energy as we shouldn't learn history 
good vibes only, ignore the massive company that always manages to get it wrong
Or learn from our mistakes
hopefully the BR mode is good
It's gonna be an optional, separate mode imo, at least that's what I'm speculating, I just want a good/great SP and great core multi-player for this new Battlefield game
ye, i heard its gonna be free too
I'm going to avoid it, and focus on the singleplayer and multi-player 💯.
A good or great SP in BF? Lmao
graphics wise are great in BF games in SP
the bar is low tbf
Or lack of which, like 2042 
The sp will likely either be extremely unfinished or it’ll have to be released after the game releases
It’s like 2 years behind 💀
I strongly disagree, but to each his own.
Mate if you’re expecting anything other than mid SP, I have a bridge to 2042 to sell you
If you don’t trust the sources that say this, that’s fine. I’m just stating a fact that some insider sources have stated that the sp is 2 years behind since most of the old team’s work was completely unusable after ea shut the studio down
I was kinda on the copium/hopium train tbh, I wish they would delay the game so that it can be released as a complete product that's well-optimized. @glad trench
Eh. Imo Sp is less important than getting it out before gta 6
Understandable, but you don't think GTA 6 will be delayed again?
again? no way
announcing different servers for open and locked weapons before the offical reveal funny af
this is all a ploy to distract everyone from the server browser ...
We probably won't get that besides for portal
We definitely need persistent servers even if we aren't getting back server browser
Also no bots in multiplayer unless it's portal or something
apparently persistent servers are a BF pro perk
No I mean like you matchmaked to a game, game ends and instead of you being sent back to main menu you are waiting for next map to load on the rotation
oh yeah
that's not gonna happen for regular MM 😭
finding anything outside of 64 conquest is impossible in my region, hopefully the MM in 6 allows for cross region
If we don’t get a map selector at least and the maps aren’t great I might just lose it
I guess we know one of the first things to give feedback about during the open beta if it isn't there
We, at least, need persistent servers. Matchmaking without them is aids cause you can join a server 1 second away from losing and get immediately kicked back to the matchmaker
If we are getting a map selector might as well just give us a server browser
That's also needed, allow us to choose our region from settings if we aren't getting a server browser
playing low population games in oceania is the worst
You don't like 1v1ing the only other person in your region on conquest large?
I love getting "waiting for 5/8 players"
Did I miss news on the new Battlefield? I saw the tweet about the playlists and it says open beta so I'm like did I miss more news?! Idk why open beta being mentioned before the Reveal is throwing me off so much 😭
🤷 They probably just wanted to get the hype train going before the reveal
I fear BF6 will lack the aura of 2042
aura?
No tornados
Tornado + Actual destruction physics would go crazy
A good FPS with solid mechanics, performance, and has an actual skill ceiling would be even crazier.
Is that even a question?
Soundtrack
The 2042 soundtrack was good, but it didn't match the game
It had a soundtrack?
I wish I removed my eyes before reading this
The harsh dark industrial soundtrack matched the dark lore and storyline of the game, bf2042 could've easily been the grittiest battlefield since BF1 but they HAD to go in the operators and cod movement style direction
Well yeah. They probably showed the music composer the lore without any gameplay footage
I want 10+ random tornadoes to spawn every match. Sometimes we can have 4 at one time from all directions
The music was pretty nice, but after the emotional highs of V and 1s I can definitely understand, and mostly followed in, its distaste
Having an emotional shift of uplifting and heartbreaking orchestral to dire and dreary electric crackle was a shock to the system
the soundtrack of 2042 is probably the part of the game that best represented the lore
She also composed the Chernobyl soundtrack so that really shows
And the last poirot film which was a surprise to see
A pretty naff film but seeing the name had me doing the funny point picture
The absolute one thing I miss that I desperately want back is that calm but eerie orchestral spawn screen music.
After a hectic fight, dying and then observing the battlefield from the top down with the Sinai desert theme playing angelically was just god tier stuff
Uhm no it wasn’t even close to being gritty at all.
“WHAT A TIME TO BE ALIVE”
See this is what happens when people can't read
Emphasis on ‘could have’
one crappy ad 
Still my point exact
Well the quote you cited came from one of the specialists, which wouldn’t exist in this theoretical state mentioned, so it’s kind of a moot statement
Brother doesn't know they removed all those lines
I don’t care, 2042 will forever be known as a watered down version of what battlefield is
Of course you don't care about facts
Well, yeah, I'm envisioning an alternate reality where bf2042 didn't have operators, or crazy movement; the mission briefings, insertion flows, dark soundtrack, could've made the game much more serious than it is. If they tone down the saturation it'll definitely be alongside BF3 or BF4, hell it'll be more gritty than BF3 or BF4 and definitely more than BFV
chill out ..
Solution;
Blue
And lots of it
Everywhere
Constant blue filter
It was a totally reasonable reaction
What's the general thought on locked/unlocked weapons in here
Personally I don't think it hinders any aspect of gameplay and actually assists data collection on class and weapon balance.
Might aswell lock em
Make battlefield more like battlefield by implementing this battlefield feature that has been the core ever since the inception of battlefield
It’ll prolly be more inherently balanced thou
Couldn't care leas if it's lock or not cuz either way I'm still gonna going to farm some kills 
can we get a woot woot for the reveal?
Woot woot 💯💯
i didn't think we'd get the reveal until like next year
Personally I prefer locked weapons if they are truly locked with no universals, makes each class distinct. If it's wishy washy like BF4 then I dislike it, might as well unlock them.
BF4 is less balanced than 2042 imo
assault fest
Prolly be either way but who knows
It will be support fest unless they give back medpen to assault
bf4 infantry is mostly coked out bf4 vets, bunny hopping with AEK's or FAMAS
sweating their body's worth for the highest kd
That's just Battlefield in general
FPS in general, multiplayer FPS has always existed to be competitive inherently.
Truth nuke
Hell, even when FPS weren't multiplayer you still had people speed running Doom for better times
And with BF6 potentially have different gun builds man, can't wait to min max it
"no fun only win"
Yeah cuz winning isn't fun...
Fun for me is farming the entire enemy team 
Going on a killstreak isn't fun either...
Sometimes meme playstyles are fun though, such as Commando Carbine/Welrod in BFV or Ghostmaker in 2042 😂
Welrod in BFV and Mere's Leg in BF4
its always funny when people complain about the "crazy" movement in 2042 when BF4 had people slingshotting themselves around corners
How is Welgun a meme playstyle though?
Welrod the single action pistol
Hell even BF3 had jump shooting too
LMAO
Jump boosting and gazelle jumping too
Meres leg is legit useful tho. It basically gives you a mini sniper as a secondary if you set it up right
More of a G-18 or CZ-45
Sure like BF6 has BF1 movement and can't jump shoot base on the leaks
Jump peeking is still viable and so is sliding in BF6 plus with gunssmith you can min max weapons
Get 100+ kills
Suit yourself
I personally hate gunsmithing but since they made it I will abuse it 
No recoil, max RPM, max strafe speed 😂
Same gonna ready for it especially on vehicles too with the Littlebird and Jet
it's just annoying for weapon balancing
especially when you include TTK changing attachments
That's just FPS in general although if there's one thing I agree is that attachments that affects TTK shouldn't exist
looking at the ammo attachments 💀
Especially the changes the amount of Headshot required
Velocity, penetration and recoil sure
welcome back MW19 ttk
Give BF6 more movement, less reticle sway, 5BTK instead of 4, no bullet types that affect headshot multipliers, add spread. Crazy we already learned so many of these mistakes in 2042 and the footage shows us repeating so many
Facts especially spread and less reticle sway even BF4 and BF3 has less reticle sway hell might as well include BFV
from the latest playtest footage most ARs are 5 btk
I haven't checked any as of late since the reticle bouncing made me sick to my stomach
Yeah, laser guns in 2042 sucked so bad. LMGs especially became ridiculous.
Fr getting beamed from 100m is ridiculous
But I partially blame it on the maps as well
Also made roller insanely effective at range with the reduced FSM, horizontal, and vertical recoil.
Maps definitely didn't help, you're right. Way too little cover, way too long sight lines, and way too much verticality.
Idk why so many people are against spread. It’s just a way to prevent guns from having insane engagement distances without turning the bullets to dust at X meters
It’s not even that hard to learn to control too
It's even stranger because the people I see who are adamant we shouldn't have spread are the people who want locked weapons. No point in worrying about weapon types per class when every weapon becomes the same as long as you mitigate recoil.
Depends on what range? Cuz that leaked footage of the new recoil had most ARs doing 25+ damage out to like 30m
I blame Suppression cuz people are thinking during gunfights when they missed but it's actually the Suppression that affects it which is awful
Plus in BF3 and especially BF4 you got Stubby + H-Barrel that reduces spread alot
Could be one of the reasons, yeah. There’s also the factor where people think that anything slightly detrimental to their aiming is the reason they’re losing even though everyone else has to deal with it too
Also strangely enough a lot of those people to have low accuracy and just try to scapegoat spread when even without it their reticle wasn't lined up.
I think those were headshots
Anyone have any ideas on what games they could add to the new portal? I doubt they’d do the same ones as 2042’s unless they just transfer those over and add new ones on top of it.
IMO HL has to be in there because of its unique theming. Idk what other games they could “remaster” though
I think a BF4 map got leaked
im just saying for the up coming BF open beta, im playing the playlist for no weapon lock
Ok? I’m going to be swapping between them to see which one I like, but feel free to do whatever you want
BF Vietnam would be cool but Portal needs a massive rework cuz the amount of XP Farm/Bot servers and 100000% DMG Afghan Milsim is atrocious
DECLARE YOUR ALLEGIANCE
Like I would rather have 24/7 Metro or Caspian servers than these
ah no embed
More BC2 rush maps making a comeback please. Especially with some renewed love being put into Rush
It would be best if its like a 3 day beta initially with 1 day being unlocked, 1 day locked, and the final day 2 different playlists
Yeah. I feel like there’s going to be a ton of people instantly choosing one side without even trying the other
Thats how all the arguments go already
yeah i can agree with this
Though, tbf, a lot of locked people will use the class weapons in unlocked anyways so I don’t think it’d change too much
Class selection variety.
Gadget usage rates per class.
Weapon selection variety.
Players revived, vehicles destroyed/repaired, etc.
A reddit post had these as things that should be looked at more than just the number of people that play
why cant i get to the page that shows every avaible playtest
Those aren't mistakes of 2042 but rather BFV tbh
Both BFV and 2042 had light bolt/shortened barrel though which gave higher ROF instead of higher damage, but achieved similar TTK to headshot bullets
BF3 and 4 had equally open maps, if not more open. Spread just allows you to not get beamed across the map in full auto. Issue of 2042 is lack of spread. Even when playerbase hates it they don't understand how it limits engagement distances.
They shouldn't add games to portal, it's a waste of time and effort to recreate old classes, weapons, vehicles etc. We should get regular map remakes if they want to do that. Weapons, classes, vehicles of portal should be lifted from BF6 itself.
Beta should be a week long similar to BF1 beta imo
Yeah but BF3 had good open maps and also why include BF4 maps when most of them are mid
All in all yeah, spread does help
all my homies playing the unlocked weapons playlist
Ill probably play locked (Even tho I dont mind either)...as its a better recipe for the success of this game IMO
You guys think there will be any official news today, considering it's Tuesday and that they just dropped a Beta bomb with no prior notice
Not that there's much to ask for knowing Beta is coming, but maybe a teaser or something
Because im based i will play both to actually see how the game plays and say it doesnt matter in the end anyway because theres no difference in gameplay anyway
My only fear with the closed weapon system is that it’s a different playlist
We know BF players can’t read at all, we’ve seen them break the NDA here about a thousand times
They’ll probably just play whichever playlist shows up first on the screen, and that’s probably going to be the open weapons one
They have to add an in game poll for the locked/unlocked weapon preference
this essentially is the poll
tbd if they have a portal mode you can search for a server with them all unlocked anyway
People are naive to think they will do anything like "Which ever mode has more players will be chosen."
Even tho I sit on the fence weapons wise, I still believe that locked signatures is more healthy for the core game and how the game/studios are viewed by players.
Locked signatures is closer to open weapons than it is to locked weapons (As it was in BF1). Its a good compromise.
I'd be fine with only locked signature weapons
Thats how the beta test will be it seems
But i bet many want even more limited selection for the classes
No bolt action on support, so its solves the most major issue with unlocked weapons!!!!
/s

crazy frog
that would beat bf1's reveal trailer
The only thing they fear is you
wrong game but close enough
or are you saying that Mick Gordon will do the score for the next Battlefield
By this do you mean that they already have the option in mind and this is just a placebo, or that they will use a different metric? Just wanting to clarify
definitely
I am his best friend and he says he would
I mean they will use data from a large amount of things to decide the direction to proceed in. Things like
- Class distribution between playlists
- Weapon distribution between playlists
- Player engagement/retention after playing on either playlist (Did more players stop playing after paying one playlist or the other)
Oh, makes sense.
From leaks, we can also see that they have a "Did you enjoy this match YES/NO" question at the end of games. Player happiness in this respect can also be measured from playlist to playlist
they axed 128 breakthrough cause it wasn't being played, and added the other modes cause they were being played a fair bit so it's clear they do look at that stuff regardless
There should specifically be a poll for "Did you like X/Y mode more?" as a sort of reassuring metric
Not as a make or break type poll, of course
Its kind of an unecessary question, but they will probably ask it. What you played more is what you enjoyed more tho. Players arent going to continue to play a mode they arent enjoying.
Well, yes, however the controversy is specifically around the weapons being UNLOCKED, so I'd imagine people would spend more time playing UNLOCKED mode just to really put the arguments to a test (arguments as in whether unlocked really is that bad and experiment). This would require some brain usage, though, which most players lack...
And I'm inclined to believe some diehard "locked weapons" fans won't give the other a glance and just try to enjoy the most out of the beta
Which is kind of the point of doing this, and why they 100% wont just select the mode with more players/playertime
It also depends on how they digest the data
Subjectively, a player who only plays the open weapons playlist, and only uses 1 weapon on every class they play...would tell ME that the open system is not the optimal system.
But that could be digested in a variety of ways. Maybe they want better class distribution, and dont necesarily care about weapon distribution much. So the above would be good for their desired player experience
I'm too dull to get into this data digestation thing
Rule of the thumb is though, your average gamer will choose the most optimal loadout in either gamemode
whatever offers the least restriction tends to be the usual play
Meh, I think it'll end in unlocked weapons
i dont think unlocked weapons are that bad
I'm honestly apathetic to it
i never played the older BF's back then (i was grinding bo1 zombies on my ps3) but playing the older bf's more recently and other games that has locked weapons, i dont mind both tbh but i do lean more to unlocked bc i like switching weapons a lot when bored
Can be either, won't ruin the game for me
It doesn't even concern me considering I can't run the game on my PC xdd
Locked seems interesting
Hate launching battle field labs and there being no servers or play button available 😭
But maybe people will be pulled by the freedom of choice regardless
Loves breaking their NDA tho
Maybe that’s why
💀
having a unified system where weapons are tied to classes: ❌
having another option or even multiple to needing to filter in the server browser: ✅
i think ill just stick to dfho, they got this shit down first try after not maiking something that rivals bf for years
whats the incentive to have classes, if they dont have specific weapons?
bro 5 games and they just cant do it right is crazy, like this is the most surface decision about this game, and they dant even so it right, guess they need data but from the beta they will get enough not sure what beta they are talking about when the game was supposed to come to early access
giving classes buffs for weapon groupd while keeping the system open is worse than just having them open...
if any dice player played bf4 rn, they wpuld notice that the servers have strict rules for some of the classes, only letting a number of player pick sniper for example this is the most significant chance for bf to still stay true to what it is, and how its balanced or if the fortnitification and cod magic will take over
but im sure in a month after launch transformer crossover with bumble bee as a car varient
Would they still have those signature buffs for the locked playlist I wonder
I’m guessing so
More incentive to use those weapons over the ones that I assume will be universal to all
But they are still nice bonuses to have
Well, if it’s balanced..
I'm not tbh, because I played BF4 just recently. SMGs are entirely useless in that game 
BF4's ''no explosives, no shotguns, no snipers'' servers aren't the reality of how those games were meant to be played, people do those because BF4's balance is 💩
Or lacks critical qol features that would make them a non issue
only an issue on hardcore servers
They are banned on regular servers too
Shotguns can one hit you from 20 meters in BF4, snipers are usually a non issue no idea why people ban them, explosive spam is something that could easily be fixed with a trophy system or sending back grenades which BF4 lacks
A bunch of reason as spelled out in the most recent blog
You, arguing over whether weapons should be class locked:
Me, arguing that weapons should be faction locked, and distributed in accordance with a nine-man US Army rifle squad:
ew. go play squad
A good idea from a good game? Incomprehensible!
But also, you know, Battlefield used to be like this (minus squads)
faction locked weapons are ok. but the squad restrictions are boring
Just please someone tell us we’re added server browser in both sides 😭
for me if they dont do class locked weapons, im kinda giving up on this game, no point in hoping its gonna be good if the very foundation the last few games relied on gets killed
no point in classes if they dont have something that makes them unique enough
they wanna make open classes so they can make predatory microdlc for class cosmetics
in bf4 you know which is the sniper and which is the medic, but they wanna sell microdlc for cosmetics
exept everyone could still run a carbine or dmr or shotty. it makes literally 0 difference if its locked or not
it does
in what way
sniper is way more potent on longer ranges than a dmr, hence the need for a sniper class is still required
so?. now if the sniper picks a LMG he just cant do long range. you're still going to pick the class for the situation in BF4 now you just pick the gun instead
sniper doesent have lmg
in BF6 it does lmao
yeah thats the issue, thats why the game is so talked about rn
thats not an issue
it is, there is no need for classes if every class can take every weapon
its the same thing as swapping from sniper class to gunner in bf4. what difference does it make if you swapp class or gun? its the same end result
gadgets and proficiency
theres no gunner in bf4 its called support
name is irrelevant for the example
no because the class defines the role you play when you play the game
still does. becaus the class is identified by its gadgets 90% of the time
if you play sniper you arent gonna be on the front resing someone you are far back taking shots
if you play engineer you go and destroy vehicles etc
yes you are. id pick sniper and a carbine just for the spawn beacon
see the issue
this is still the case with unlocked weapons, a MG is not killing a armored vehicle
this was a thing in BF4
Battlefield 6 reveal trailer on the 24th 
blinded by the hype
blinded by unc nostalgia
i just wanna see it at this point if support has defib im done
bor the finals has better class structure than bf6 rn
cool. go play it then
i am 
go play cod then if classes is too much for you, his toes curl back from arma
all my homies are playing the unlocked weapon playlist during open beta
last cod game ive played was MW2019 and i have more hours on Arma 3 than cod lol
Does anyone how to get into the playtest because it’s pretty confusing to me
the art for the trailer is absolute fire ngl
wait till you figure out you can have a sniper AND a rocket launcher in arma. class stucture in shambles
Arma unironically has less restriction than COD
HOLY SHIT
Just remember if you pre order you’re a certified smooth brain
lol less restriction in arma also comes with using any of it requiring way more steps. BF players would be pissed if they had to get a vehicle and read a map just to get to an objective
dont pre-order if youre a certified brokie
And even IF you are actually gonna pre order, do it AFTER the Open Beta happens
Money for a game is fleeting, disappointment with a bad game is forever
So you actually see what you are gonna get
what difference does it make if i pay for it before release since im going to buy it anyways and make my own decision whether its good or bad
you can cancel at any point so makes no differnce
Did this man just say the work brokie lmfao. Testosterone levels under 300 confirmed
Yea, but atleast see what product you will get before pre ordering instead of doing it blind
obviously live your life, but if a movie director kept putting out half-finished movies and then fixing em later, i probably wouldn't buy tickets to the next movie ahead of release
because it signals its fine to release half-finished movies to fix later
except id rather make that conclusion myself rather than listening to others opinions
yeah, guys, do not preorder.
hence the live your life part, but you asked what the difference was so i explained it
but it makes no difference in the end since im going to buy it either way and make my own decision its not like it costs more
i just explained the difference, i can't also understand it for you
your difference only applies if you only listen to what others think and don't make decisions for yourself
but you asked what others think lmao, by asking what the difference is
like for example, my friend does not like monster hunter and thinks its a bad game, if i listened to him and didn't buy it based on his opinion id never have played my favorite game series
obviously pre-order it if it makes ya happy, that's what games are for is having a good time
i asked what difference does it make if i pre order or not since im going to buy it either way. i didnt ask what you're implying
Snipers get bodied by DMRs within an realistic engagement range. Snipers outside a dmr range provide nothing for your team
Hysterics over bolt actions is the biggest tell tale sign you’re just bad
yeah! the difference is the message that sends to the publisher, that you as a buyer vote to give them your money without verifying the completion of the game. whereas not preordering does the opposite
the end result is the same tho?........ i'm going to buy it and see for myself if i like it no one else can make that decision for me
the end result is the same for you, not necessarily for the company 🙂
to be clear i'm not telling you what to do, just answering what you asked
Why do you hate the company, who spends hundreds of millions making a game many of us want to play/have succeed?
i get that. im just saying it makes no difference if they get my money on the 12th of august or the 24th of august they're getting it either way
what
no ones hating on anything here
we're just discussing pre-orders
why does it matter if its changes things for the company (EA) tho
and if anyones hating on anything it should be the shareholders
i suppose from your point of view yeah. the movie director analogy here is apt illustration of the difference. i will say i preordered 2042 and felt like in doing so, i communicated to EA that I was willing to give them money without verifying they were releasing a finished product. This time myself and seemingly many others are waiting to verify, and it's leading to things like Battlefield Labs and pre-release development updates
Ooo that’s a nice surprise
so i'm happy with my decision, but i'm not gonna hate on anyone else for theirs
this is the way to go about it. everyone should make their own decision and not be hated on for some silly thing like pre ordering
i think its fair to question pre orders with EA and battlefield, as their cinematic team can make anything look good and idk how they cook so hard but even with that and with how the gaming sphere has been pre orders are 50/50
yeah. i'm fine with the constant "don't preorder!!" conversation because it does generate solid discussion. but i see people being verbally attacked for saying essentially that they've seen enough and are ready to buy it and i think that's super lame to treat people like that lol
I mean impactful change can only happen through pushing for it but yeah let people spend their money how they like. 
Your messages (To me) allude to you you thinking pre-orders are bad. They can be 100%, but im my case (and others) they are gonna buy the game anyway. So its hardly a bad thing to have EA able to report things like "Record pre-orders for the Battlefield Franchise" or such to shareholders. It just means the franchise will continue to be funded.
Additionally, this game is a VERY different case, as most of us have already seen dozens/hundreds of hours of gameplay
me? @feral garden just making sure i'm following ya here
Exactly this
No real serious target, just chiming in lol
aye aye capn, i don't necessarily disagree with ya
Will there be more performance play tests with people who signed up for Labs?
Before launch
Well they announced an open beta (No date for it yet) yesterday
but unless you try it yourself how can you decide what "impactfull" change is? do you trust everyone elses opinion about it?
Yeah. Wonder for how long it will last. And if they then need still more input before launch
i'm HYPE for a beta. i'm gonna get some friends that don't really play battlefield on it with me and some friends that do, and see how the game feels with friends
So, I guess 6 is its real name
Yes
i really hope they add more Chinese guns before launch. their modern firearms are really cool only having the QBZ-191 is sad
tbf 2042 was titled 'Battlefield' and 'Battlefield 6' in its trailers before premiere 
i wonder why they named it Battlefield 6 when something like "Battlefield 14 (XIV): Not Hardline, Bad Company, XX42, Heroes, or Vietnam Just a Regular One" would have been so much more descriptive
there is still chance for it to be called Bad Company 3
that'd require a camping with bad 2000's humor
They literally announced the reveal trailer which says the name is Battlefield 6. No way they are going to change it
Battlefield: Good Company 1
idk if we care much about creators in here but i'm like 99.99% sure timthetatman is doing something next week related to the game
so its looking like trailer this week, event next week
Haven’t heard his name in years
yeah i don't really care too much about what he's up to, but the relevant part is that we're probs getting more info next week too. which lines up with a potential august beta
Probably some insider discussions right after the reveal like last time
nice, that makes sense. i know its all marketing hype but it'll be nice to get some info like "how many maps", "is there a BR coming at launch", "how long is the campaign" etc
And honestly, knowing that the game is fun already has me more excited. If there were no leaks I’d just be deadpan
hopefully they will be alot more straight to the point like that
One thing I heavily disliked about 2042 was the near total radio silence after the reveal. 
It already made me suspicious of how the game would eventually turn out
really the maps piece is gonna be big for me. i know Labs only got like 3, but there's a big difference between launching with 8 fully-completed maps and 14
if i'm being honest since they're committed to a BR (which i'll try, Firestorm was lit), I hope they delay launching that part until spring or something so they have the resources to focus on the core game
Prob won’t be til the 29th-31st for the details with the reveal trailer just being a hype trailer
And some cheeky teasers up til the 29th
Zero chance there’s going to be 14, some delusional thinking lol
14.. what? oh nvm I misread
Man if getting caught in the weeds was an Olympic event this would take gold lol
I’m just curious what the U.S. player models look like and if the 91st Cav regiment from the U.S. Army is still in the game.



