#battlefield-labs-discussion
1 messages · Page 85 of 1
This is my actual voice, unedited BTW
BF1 glazers when you ask them to list a huge positive aspect of the game apart from "the atmosphere and immersion bro"
I can't have a serious convo with these guys. Unironically telling me stuff like: "females don't belong in war games, this is why Battlefield is in decline"
jesus christ, touch some grass
the gas grenades 
they make enemy eye go bad, make easy kill 
And as a result it's all they talk about when discussing labs. "the atmosphere bro, BF6 has to nail it! BF1 is the absolute best because of it!!" 
have to use mask all the time and can't see shit, soooo immersive bro 
not like you can normally anyways on the average BF1 night map 
god, i hated the gas nade spam on bf1
shit was annoying af especially when you're not in the cloud and it still affects you
BF1 is what I call a tourists paradise
they hated him for saying the truth
No but seriously that's the perfect fitting description for it
.
Don’t tell Reddit this though, you will get down voted into Davy Jones locker 🤣
Yup, the black sheep of the series and what a shocker it was reddit's favourite.
Gunplay is good besides visual recoil
BFV butchered gunplay and 2042 is a bit too laserbeamy so BF1 has best gunplay among modern BF games I would say
apparently people cant have preferences nowadays so if someone likes a game you dont is a glazer and tourist 
I got a Xbox invite when I play on pc, why do u do this to me
Still waiting dor mine
That's why its so great
Not saying you can't enjoy it but many kind of refuse to elaborate or go deeper as if "atmosphere" is the sole thing that makes a shooter fun and enjoyable to play. As well as having the attitude of "BF1 is the best because that's the only one/first one I played"
I get it,but i think the forced racism hate on people who play BF1 is too much

Ive played every BF and i enjoyed every single bf,even 2042 a little bit
True
its just that bf1 players are too casual minded with the game
i mean every BF is casual
a lot of players that didnt like bf1 came from bf4 where we had esports and just ingeneral much better players due to a larger skillgap game
so is the people who make it competitive
there was official tourneys for bf4
to me what matters if the game is fun
it should be fun for everyone
and not cater into super casual playerbase that struggles with pressing sprint key
like a said that just preferences
bf1 was just hyper casual and it had a lot of game mechanics that heavily aided worse/casual players so its just sheer annoyance to play that game
you cant like every game just like how people like the games you dont like
"Came from BF4, where we had esports".
Spoken as if BF4 esports ever was actually a serious thing.
it was fairly big for a bf game
there were a lot of advertisments for the events aswell and just being able to see what the good players played like what the skillgap was, i think a lot of people were just more interested in actually getting better at the game
bf4 players were definitely significally better players than players from bf1
there was an attempt at trying to bring back competitive gameplay in 2042 but it just pretty much died because no one really wanted to play it
And here lays part of the problem. Too many people view players who just play for fun/without much of a care, or wihtout their aim to get better as a casual or a tourist
Which leads to these opinions on BF1
them being casual isnt particularly the issue with the game
its just that they want a lot of mechanics that just arent very great and are a bit too forgiving
BF1 just had a lower ceiling for skill, which made it easier to play for a casual player
for example bf1 removed movement from the game just removes depth from the game, sweetspot, suppression, grenades/gadgets were more spammable so they had an opportunity to just spam nades and get fairly cheap free kills off of that
pretty much the worst things you want to play against, someone shooting at you before you shoot at them pretty much made it impossible for you to properly aim towards them to counter, its still doable but its pretty clear that it allows them to have extra time to correct their aim whilist making it harder for everyone else to aim
getting 2/3 hits on a sniper just for them to be within sweetspot range on complete accident and 1 tap you anyway
the game can still be casual but without some dummy mechanics inplace
and those same bf1 players dont seem to realize that not only does it aid them to position better it doesnt really mean that the game will be inherently mechanical skill
or disrupt gamepace
Everything you mention can also be used to your advantage. Play the game, dont let the game play you
A game that can appeal to casual players but still offer depth = good
A game where casuals remove every aspect of skill expression or gap = bad
Pretty straightforward.
^^
yeah but its still just annoying lol
why remove depth and skillgap from the game for the sake of it
I never felt like BF1 lacked skill, or the ability to pull of plays when I played it. So I always feel like this is some crazy revisionism.
theres always skill involved but its the amount that was heavily toned down
true
the game just has no real depth
You have the same, or better ability as the other players. I just dont get it. Being a good player, you will still be a better player.
battlefield players are not losing anything from slightly better movement
it isnt about that
BF1 absolutely had no skill gaps comparatively. AD strafe speeds got gutted, they added body shot multipliers to arms and legs, slide got nerfed, so paired with a lot of visual recoil, sweet spot mechanics, easiest sniping of the series, etc it was just a solved meta in a matter of days.
Im not using this as a way to ask for lesser movement in other games in futre, im just saying that when I played BF1, it was always a pretty good time.
you cant strafe in that game at all thats how bad it is lol
like the most generic bit of movement isnt even doable
NGL, I preferred strafing as it was in BF3
Not the twitchy broken animation BS of BF4
not only is it slow you cant really fire accurately mid movement so you still have to play standstill the entire game
bf4 strafe iirc was only very slightly accelerated
Reference to what I mean: https://youtu.be/WoGULTnalfY?si=ORntiEH6uLK8VSiR&t=7
For More Gaming Tips and Tricks, Subscribe ► http://bit.ly/1lumAKr
Hey guys, today we have a quick little video showing off the soldier strafing difference between Battlefield 3 and Battlefield 4. Personally I feel the glitchy nature of BF4 animations makes it really hard to follow player movement and create unnatural looking motions.
Networ...
also broken animations dont come from strafe speed within itself
they do when you lack motion matching
bf2042 has fairly good strafing with good animations
BF2042 was a bit sluggish and unresponsive at times but mechanically it worked quite well.
yeah
It also didn't require the higher mechanical skill to execute like a lot of cancels in BF3 days which opened up accessibility
like no ones asking for anything crazy just a usable slide, strafe, jumpshotting im expecting will be back, leaning
What we have seen so far in the leaks looks basically perfect TBH. No complaints from me.
people are just exaggerating
Honestly even the bhop in 2042 had no air control and momentum loss so it was quite subdued in application.
bhopping wasnt even something that was difficult to counter either it just allowed you to move accross empty space better
You can strafe only in close range in BF3 but might as well hipfire at that point. Crouching and bursting was meta in BF3
yeah
Looks awful to me, reticle bounce like crazy and you lose significant momentum after the first bhop. Strafe also seems slow.
idk i havent really looked at leaks i dont really care to watch a pre alpha that will change pretty drastically anyway
Same, with battlefield you can pretty easily keep all the games on your library and each one offers a different experience that is varied enough to where they are all a good time for different reasons
All good with me. Learn how weapons behave to master it. Skill and all that, right?
Strafe seems to be slow and ADS seems to be slowe according to people who played it, movelet game
You have to do that regardless, and if anything you need MORE mastery to deal with a moving opponent than a stationary one.
Bring back BFV lightened stock 
bf1 weapons didnt require much mastery you just really needed to know “ready to fire state" fire mechanic and pace your shots
More to learn, so higher skill ceiling, right?
so all you had to really learn was positioning

Honestly, ill always just flat out disagree with anyone who wants tolerances towards b hopping.
like yes you can add timing, spatial awareness, predicting, understanding team rotations/enemy rotations
whats wrong with bhopping other than "it looks stupid" though
BF has fairly fast TTK anyways so movement won’t turn it into an arena shooter
yeah like i said in previous battlefield games the movement mechanics in those games it just made the rotating between positions much better
Doesnt belong in BF franchise. Not as a core pillar of mechanics
you couldnt pull very heavy aggressive plays and just mindlessly freeroam the map
why not
you had a very slight bhop in bf4 aswell
I think it should exist/be possible as a result of momentum meeting jumping/sliding > jumping...but it shouldnt be something that is actually added as a deliberate mechanic, and given any balance. Basically you should have the same penalty when using it, as a regular jump/corner jump
The same way sliding should exist as a way to match, or be the intermediate state between a sprint to a crouch. But slide accuracy/weapon usability in this scenario needs to be balanced. As the slide accuracy should be somewhere between a sprint and a crouch
Could be used for its primary purpose of wide swinging in close quarters then
I would rather want BF to be jump heavy than slide heavy tbh 
But milisim crowd hates jumping too, some people even said replace it with contextual vaulting 
Both should be possible. But with players of equal skill, id always prefer the non jumping/sliding player to have the accuracy/weapon usability advantage
Jumpshots were balanced in 2042 imo
Especially against roller players who were ready to beam me from 50 meters
Eh...yes and no. Mechanically balanced...maybe. But 2042 is so random, and the map design and sight lines are so terrible that its hard to really know how balanced it is/was
I never felt like a corner jumper absolutely ruined me, so i can agree partially
Bhopping was a non issue in 2042 because you lose momentum quickly and you're locked into a linear path
No air strafing and no redirecting of momentum made it very readable
I use it to throw off RAA that’s locked to me 
But it definitely saved my ass from being killed by someone in a spot id never predict across the open plains of Discarded
That's where the significant amount of movement complaints come from, CoD players on low sens who are used to the game doing the heavy lifting so breaking their camera is the problem and not them raising their sens and learning to pull their stick.
This is not the discord for the playtests
This is for public info about labs in general
Speaking of. I never got the playtest discord invite or I missed it…
Is ‘breaking the camera’ just meant to mean someone moving outside of their field of view?
Yeah, breaking camera is moving completely out of FOV and breaking bubble is moving beyond the aim assist bubble so the RAA won't track you and any ADS snap won't be close enough to lock onto you. The end goal of both is the same though.
idk theres no real need to heavily nerf being able to shoot mid slide
So someone achieving the goals of movement gets a complaint - avoiding shots
you cant really pull aggressive plays with it anyway and a positioned standstill target has an easier time killing you anyway
you cant directly slide into people and walk away with 10 kills thats more of just timing and using slide to get by some of the campers
There should be an accuracy penalty, or vision penalty for siding, but that is enough. Ideally any penalty would also be learnable, so you can adjust (The same way you adjust to recoil)
camping shouldnt be something thats rewarded or something people should stray out to do it just doesnt work well
i mean you can add a penalty i just dont really see what for
You could also just slow peek them as games designed around less movement are promoting
yeah its still a positioning centered game you cant really freerun like i said
Sure it isn’t as aim savvy or particularly fast paced or challenging but there’s a counter still
theres 32 players you cant just do a raid on them and run accross them like they are afk
what slide more of allows is just more peek options/entry options
and less detection because you make yourself smaller and are able to utilize cover better
and better positioning rotation
bf5 had the most mechanical complexity of any battlefield game im pretty sure that no one felt like they couldnt fight against more mechanically skilled players
One thing I do find a little contradictory is when people say v is the best for its lack of complexity but you can literally shift direction mid way through. Like, 2042’s slide to them (without jumps or anything) is too much yet somehow v’s isn’t
i could unbind slide entirely and play fine
bf5 had by far the most movement options
not only could you slide in 4 different directions you could lean mid slides, lean mid jumpshots
ads stabilisation jump was brought back
roll, crouch run, climb
The traversal stuff was fantastic
The mirrors edge fan in me was having a blast with it
Imo it’s good to add some sort of downside because you shouldn’t be able to quickly change your hitbox without any downsides. It’s the same reason for having longer ads times when you’re aiming from a sprint
that depends on animations more of
You get more maneuverability in exchange for less combat readiness
for example bf2042 has very fluid in and out of slide animations, you could react and track it perfectly fine
bf5 was definitely more yanky with its animations
bf5 going into slide was a bit too abrupt
and its prone mechanics were pretty abrupt aswell
you could bug your hitbox entirely for an extremely small frame window when going from proning on your stomach to your back
but what is the downside for though
like what do you not want to allow from movement
even without penalties you cant do very aggressive plays with it
and you can also have way too harsh penalties on movement like bf1 did where you just couldnt strafe due to spread increase, it being fairly slow with going to right meant that you had a penalty on moving to left
"crouch spam" added a lot of penalties for no real reason
these penalties only aid bad players for just being bad for no real reason and your general playerbase wont really even use many movement mechanics at all
nor do you really have to use those said movement mechanics
since bf games are fairly fast paced its actually better to not add too many penalties on movement because you decrease amount of outplay/counter plays
I just personally don't want to see people instantly slide when they get into a gunfight to make their hitbox half the size. I'd rather slide be used as an escape tool than as a gunplay mechanic
If they balance it properly, I don't have an issue with there being low to no penalty.
Movement's downside is you have to counteract your own movement with aim.
why not though
you can still aim and track them perfectly fine
and again like its not something you can really counter or punish a player within a good position
a standstill player will always have an easier time shooting from a safe position than players having to navigate the movement and being accurate enough on top to have a slight change of killing a player within a better position
It just feels stupid to me. I prefer the slower style of movement like in 3/4/HL (I played these on console so don't spout excuses about movement glitches)
Y'know, I would actually be fine with all the fast paced movement y'all want if they just killed crossplay
Would fix 99% of all the movement issues
idk feeling stupid imo isnt a real reason to just remove or outirght kill certain movements via penalties
agree
You should be made lesser in one area of ability, when you use another tht advantages you in a gunfight. Its the reason your movement speed is slower when crouching. the same should apply to sliding.
mechanical movement should be looked into if it actually heavily impacts gameplay in some way
bf5 had fairly fast crouch run speed and iirc crouch running was supposed to return in 6
you should use both analog sticks to control each leg
BFV also has crouch sprint to ADS speed and accuracy penalties
It isn't removing or killing them though? A small (or even big) accuracy penalty wouldn't outright kill the movement. It's like BSoD said. Every other movement mechanic has downsides and upsides such as sprinting having ads penalties. Idk why sliding should be the odd one out
i think sprinting and being able to shoot at the same time would for example be a fairly dumb mechanic
like slight spread increase from mid slide would be perfectly fine
but not something that makes you unable to shoot midslide because that would remove counter play option
can we expect a full reveal for the game this month or is that a pipe dream
There should always be a penalty to something, if your action makes you better in another aspect of combat.
Crouch = More accurate/smaller hitbox = less fast
Sprint = faster = less accurate/slower time to ADS
Slide = Faster/smaller hitbox = less accurate/slower time to ADS
I'm kinda in favor of sliding allowing shooting, just not with sights
Again, movement actions already have the offset of you moving past your target faster which means you yourself have to compensate more with your aim.
sliding hasnt been signifcally faster than run speed in battlefield games
It'd still allow you to fight back, but not as powerfully as if you were standing facing them
only bf2042 had a very slight momentum boost going into a slide
5 was 1/1 with runspeed
and well tbh thats the only games where we really had an actual slide mechanic
But slide makes your hitbox smaller, in the same way a crouch does. So you have the speed, so you need to reduce the accuracy, or ADS speed
yeah but youre always going to have an advantage from a held position over someone thats likely not within position when approaching with a slide
why does the hitbox size matter? the hitbox size in 2042 is extremely large even midslide
Slide also puts you into a predictable linear path and guts momentum at the end so you can't chain movement immediately after.
Its an advantage to the user of it
against who?
Movement is not some autowin mechanic that gives you a kill for executing it.
Someone shooting you. Are these actual serious questions?
theres only 2 real options
Use some common sense
- the player just doesnt have very good aim fundamentals
or well actually just 1 option
just track them and react to the slide like you usually aim?
if you react first you have an advantage still anyway
Na, balance the game to not make an action which give an advantage, no disadvantage
i cant imagine sliding giving you an edge its more of a micro chance inreality
I guess no player ever will use slide then, right?
sliding isnt inherently meant for aggressive plays
It is
no
I guess youre gonna run the avenue now of "I use it to get to cover"
Again, the disadvantages are 1) you are put into a predictable path with no way to redirect 2) your initial speed ends up with no momentum 3) it throws the user's aim as well
When you in your own videos (That you always tell us to watch) use it agressively
you cant use it for aggressive plays in 5 or 2042 other than give you a counterplay option but you still are in an disadvantage when someone reacts and shoots at you first
for example theres a player to the left of me he starts firing at me, i react with slide, i now need time to turn over to the player, predict and react to the player and only then i can start firing
and in the whole course of that the player that reacted first has all the time in the world to track and aim at me with a gun that can potentially kill me within 200-400ms
Also true, giving away your position to the defending player still means you're the reactive vs proactive one. Another disadvantage.
i havent done bf5 videos or 2042 videos
and i dont use slide in an aggressive manner because theres no real viable options for it
It's often why you don't see top players executing a lot of those same movement mechanics against good players. More often than not you'll utilize jiggle peeking and non-biased strafes as opposed to bhops or slides outside of fringe scenarios.
other than pushing up to a target but that depends on other enemy positions and timing
So in your opinions, should you be allowed to slide and 180 turn on a player with no restrictions?
We already listed a billion disadvantages you get for initiating movement, what more do you want?
why not
lol, ill talk to ye in a few months so
like in this scenario the entire reason why you lost the gunfight was not due to me sliding but due to you missing
if its a good player that reacts first you wont be able to offset them with a slide
or have enough time to react properly, you die either on the moment you get into a slide or die during slide without having enough time to react to it
Maybe not even a bad player 🤯
wdym
like a bad player vs bad player scenario?
that just means that the player that executed a slide to counter your intial reaction is just simply better still
its much harder to pull off than being stationary and shooting at something that has a harder time to properly respond
Staying still and shooting is infinitely easier than moving and shooting.
like you can add a spread increase to that movement i just dont really see a reason to
im also pretty certain that you cant even really fire for a few frames going into a slide animation?
and bf5 the reason why people were just harder to hit wasnt really because of the movement but because the character models were pretty awkward with slim hitboxes
+abrupt animations on top
with spread to recoil mechanics ontop of weapon recoil pattern
#streams-and-videos message very quick sample of what the slide speed of bf5 is and some more broad examples on how its used
i think anyone would be fine with a slide like that
like nothing gamebreaking and just a fairly generic slide duration/speed
2042 slide has pretty much the same usecases other than you can gain momentum for a bhop but thats like pretty much the main key difference
and you are within a single motion again unlike in bf5 where you had 4 directions
@minor linden @pulsar shard
I’m glad BF6 isn’t shown in SGF 
Hopefully we will see reveal trailer in Xbox showcase 2 days later 🤞
I think it's going to be next week
Well Andrew Wilson said they were going to announce it in a big gaming showcase in summer
I don’t think there is any showcase next week, state of play and SGF already ended so that leaves us with Xbox
You think its going to be the XBOX Showcase?
maybe
I think so, Ghost of Hope claimed BO7 isn’t ready to be shown and both BFV and 2042 were shown in Xbox showcases
So that leaves a spot for an arcade militaristic FPS
2 days later
Yeah i just looked up after😭
Call of Duty, as long as they do yearly releases I will ignore them. 
You can probably understand why
I will play singleplayer, maybe a week of MP then delete it 
Thanks to gamepass I don’t need to pay full price for CoD
Lucky you, Steam doesn't have that, all CoD games are so expensive except the last days, I bought Black Ops III. Amazing game, I hope they look back and make a unique, fully fleshed out game and stop yearly releases and reskinned games.
pc has gamepass too
Less likely. But still have chance
And most of all Xbox has Call of Duty franchise so would be weird for Battlefield to be released there
What?
Steam? I just use Steam, but you mean XBOX thing on Windows
yeah
why not just use the xbox app for gamepass kekw
Hm ok, never thought I just used Steam
I never had XBOX so not familiar with that system at all.
True
But still disappointed that new Battlefield game did not announced at SGF
It would be the best place for it to be announced
I was expecting it to be shown in state of play before sgf tbh
EA or DICE wasn’t in SGF partner list but there was a possibility of them being in state of play
4 countries work on this game, they're afraid to where to reveal it
or maybe EA having their own Showcase this summer, like the past years?
EA stopped doing that years ago
I don’t mind if they don’t do anything really but I was expecting a shadow drop
Oh really? That is interesting
EA is oddly silent cause they're dumbasses. What did BF do last time?
It was bad if I remember it correctly
If the game does not get revealed this Xbox Showcase then we should wait until August, gamescom
(Or hope they just shadowdrop teasers afterwards)
One thing can be sure and that is the trailer will be a banger
BF trailer team always delivers
The trailer team 
💀 All summer and nothing would be sad
Don’t panic yet, there is still an Xbox showcase
It’s time to panic if we don’t see it in Xbox 
Most likely we’ll see it at the Xbox Showcase, given that there’s nothing mentioned of an EA Play or EA Conference
it makes sense to also announce/unveil and update to it alongside the upcoming skate title
Gamescom 100% is also another possibility if nothing is mentioned Sunday
gamescom is a bit late
either it's at the xbox event or they're doing their own thing later this month
...Btw I might be wrong, there was case like Battlefield 2042 being revealed on Xbox + Bethesda E3 2021 so yes given the traditions about new battlefield trailer there might be more chance
I play Black Ops for the time being
Gotta stay productive with something so time can fly til we're there
I told you, game will be revealed on the 17th for my birthday 😎
Except battlefield 5s trailer all the others are amazing
what's this about a trailer (0v0?
Hi guys as someone who has thousands of hours into so many battlefield games I was wondering what you think about this: what if Team Deatmatch just randomly selected multiple small portions of larger maps regularly. So the map rotation would be like 100 maps. Some silly some fun some normal. I have always thought that more people would play if there were more maps ❤️ 💙 💜 💖 💗
Would def be interesting
Been asking for that forever
I mean why can't they do different layers of the same map with conquest
They already did that with the Stadium, but let's play it even
Stadium is a separate map now though
They have a mode which does this, control
Are we allowed to talk about things that have been posted to Reddit here or is this channel only for talking about news posted by EA
- Leaks - The sharing and discussion of leaked information will be closely monitored. There is to be no discussion of leaks that are circulating in small groups, feel like hearsay, and/or don't match known information around the product as well as no downloading/direct re-sharing of game footage that has been leaked elsewhere. Players can however discuss leaks that are seen as widely available or have been covered by mainstream media sources, but this is entirely at the moderator/staff team’s discretion.
If it's "leaked" then no
Unless it’s the right kind of leak, in which case it’s somehow alright
if u didn’t sign an nda u can discuss what u want 👍
No you can't. You'll just be muted here, then banned on repeat offenses.
can you cite this information please.
the above bullet point addresses what people need to know.
No need, it's cited above. If people take the piss and talk about or post related to leaks, mods have and will mute/ban you on a case by case basis.
“players however can discuss leaks that are seen as widely available or have been covered by mainstream media sources”
How does one know when the next test is? Will someone get an email
The vast majority of leaks don't quality for talking about under those criteria.
the cases that you state are largely from people that break nda or post actual videos/pictures of leaks, please be reminded that if you simply talk about them and have not signed nda you may talk about what you desire.
So it remains the same, they are fine with basic discussion, but don't want these channels to devolve into "BF Labs Leak discussion"
People talking about things that leaked, not having signed an NDA are not immune to the rules of this server.
So no, you may not talk about what you desire .
i don’t understand why you felt the need to fear monger then. you could have simply said that instead of “no. you will be muted and banned.” be more careful with your verbiage.
Feel free to test the theory tho. 👍
See you in 24 hours to a week, depending on how long you get muted for.
I did say that, you continued
Anyway. So how would someone know when the next test if they got invited? A email or what?
i just don’t understand why this has made you upset lol
Email yes
Thanks player
In what way am I upset? I merely informed you about how things work here.
i didn’t know you were a moderator wow you must run things around here in the battlefield-labs-discussion channel ooo 😭
I'm not, I'm a server regular, so I know better than some what the rules are, and/or how they are enforced.
stating your server role does not does not instantly make you more reputable than others ,, lowkey just got the ick from that
Cool story tbh. At least you, or others won't accidentally break a rule > get muted or banned. 👍
thank u so much my white knight
literally me being muted the past week
spaced out and posted a reddit link with some leaked gameplay, poof muted
Rookie error
Probably Blacklisted from BFLabs as well 
Rooks blue seems to me, having fun, how do you play? It's in the Game without a browser it'll go away
read the email slowly and carefully
hi! I got an error called 0:13C:-12561655840, and I have no Content 3 Add-on, is this normal or fixable? EDIT: Platform is PC
if i missed first invitation won't i get second one ?
I believe you are re-entered into the pool of candidates. But make sure to update your playtest preference to be in with the best chance for selection
WhatAShame.gif
I wish There was a way to redo the BFLabs survey, just to make sure everything is correct
https://www.reddit.com/r/Battlefield/comments/1l6bww9/king_of_the_street/
@rugged seal people see one sniper clip like this and just assume every single sniper going forward is Jason Bourne
when is the next playtest?
Not even an impressive clip
I got the same error. Did you ever get this fixed?
Didn’t they allow embeds and shit a couple days ago?
that's the magic of my statement, most people are so dogwater at the game, any person being "good" makes them freak out
Where is BF6 reveal trailer?
9 days
Next year
5/26/26 
they would randomly drop like GTA Trailer .. source : my alcohol
@glad flume iv heard this Friday
06/06/25 would be a goated date 😛
hop in the delorean marty
Btw no Battlefield game reveal this Xbox Games Showcase 2025, see you at August (Gamescom)
So disappointed
you guys understand that BF is big enough for it's own reveal right? Just like they did with BFV...
They quitted doing that long ago, now they only reveal it during game shows
it's been one game where they didn't do that since BFV...
They'll have their own event, I don't think it'll be at Gamescom.
to think they want to share their giant reveal for the "revival" of the franchise with other games
gamescom will get a gameplay trailer, it won't be the reveal
Imagine if they announced it during the Xbox showcase with the ultra special show at the end just being cod
lol. It is funny how effective/OP people think bolt actions are. when only 1% of the playerbase are capable of things like this. That 1% also only using bolt actions a % of their playtime also
nah man you don't get it, if this guy has access to an ammo box/med kit he'll be unkillable
Hopefully BF trailer will also use a NIN cover 🤣
That teaser man…
it's 2025 with back to back worst releases in the series, it's not post-bf3 2013 anymore
doesn't matter, people will still eat it up
meanwhile 2 of those "worst" releases sold a combined ~28 million copies and 2042 wasn't some sales flop either
the labs trailer got like 1.8 million views 🥀
the labs reveal had over 1.5mil views and the labs signup had well over 500k signups, possibly over 1 mil
straight cope to still think this IP doesn't carry giant weight
1.8m is not a lot for a franchise with "giant weight" and especially not in this era with more people online than ever
you and most of the battlefield playerbase are hard stuck in 2013
it's not bad
for a reveal of a limited access playtest environment, it's a lot. It wasn't an official reveal of a newly titled BF
it ain't even the proper reveal
ya me, the guy who dogs on BF 3/4 boomers all day is stuck in 2013
people will always fiend for a good battlefield, there's a reason everyone was gassing up battlebit lol
And delta force
even JackFrags vid just recapping the playtest reveal was his highest viewed vid of the last 4 months
forgot about that 💀💀💀💀
people spent like 4 years trying to hype up WW3 too lmao
And now you’ve got wardogs on the way
I will say the armour system is neat but yeah lol
jackfrags and the people who watch him are the most stuck in 2013 lmfao, you will not catch any of those people dead actually playing the game
did I say they'd play the game? No, it's pointing out how despite this IP being at it's lowest it still garners a huge amount of attention and public consciousness when official reveals/news happen.
oh yeah and all the public attention around the finals, concord etc definitely converted to players
wow almost like the game has to also be good to convert attention into a consistent playerbase
and we have a battlefield series that is consistently bad post-bf1 
finals n concord are not really comparable...
both games everyone loved to talk about and not play
really bending over backwards, reaching for shit to not argue the point originally stated
BF is big enough for its own reveal
hey, they can try their luck with it if they really want to, bf is way more of an insulated bubble than people think
I don't think the talk about Concord was ever positive 💀
It sucks having new shooters just die immiedietly
I need to get on splitgate 2 asap as it’ll definitely only last 6 months tops
still one of the biggest names in the FPS sphere
whatever their co-CEO and social media guy was doing ain't helping
no, it's a brand that pretty much everyone who plays games knows of, whether they play BF or not.
you are delusional
On SGF?
you're the one acting like BF isn't one of the most recognizable IPs in gaming because they released two versions of the game you didn't like (but still sold well)
franchise is truly in demise
yeah lol
dude a whole generation of shooter players have grown up and moved on having never seen the outside of an overwatch or valorant lobby, and people are in here pretending past glory from 15-20 years ago is relevant at all
You keep moving the goalposts. At first it was because the last two were bad despite still selling. Now it’s people living 15-20 years ago
you could probably say the same for people who only play CS and CoD lol
I would say the 18th is the reveal date
Regardless they’ll be doing their own reveal anyway
The reveal is happening in June tho
Can easily do a cryptic tweet and set a premier for the day after
that 17th of june date...
Nah announcement a day before and a trailer the next day.
That’s what I just said
You said a cryptic tweet I said an regular announcement
semantics
I really did like what they did leading up to portal
Could be the 18th
But that was really mysterious with little surrounding it before some journalist group accidentally published it earlier
how are we sure its June?
Dev tweets that sound suspicious
Yes Cadwoman bascially teased it on twitter
is cadwoman a dev ?
Creator
She’s an EA creator
or has close relationship with the devs
Yes
I don’t buy it personally, I took it as a nod to 2042’s june boom hints
Nah A Dice Dev also teased it as well
That tweet has since been deleted....
Doesn't mean anything
Yes it can, a deleted tweet from a DICE dev is very credible
It’s been posted on Reddit anyways
June makes sense...
June 18th, mark my words
what timezone
11am EST, that’s the time they would post trailers and stuff for BF
Today, 4pm bst
BF6 will be the 18th installment of the franchise, we know the reveal is happening in June cause it’s been teased by creators and actual devs, BF would usually post their trailers on a Wednesday the 18th is on a Wednesday.
yeah I dunno about the 18th installment part
the wednesday stuff is reasonable
hold on the Labs trailer released on the 4th of Feb which was a tuesday...
If they’re clinging hard on nostalgia which clearly that’s what they’re doing for BF6 then June 18th would be very reasonable
dude nobody knows theres 18 battlefield games
the 17th of June is on a tuesday as well...
This June 18th thing is very much a stretch lol
Feels like conspiracy theory pulling stuff out of thin air to make something seem true
I'm more inclined to believe something is happening on the 17th
So June 17th?
This is starting to feel like the Titanfall community whenever Respawn puts a 3 in anything lol
The amount of reaching here is crazy
Ok cope harder I guess, something is happening on the 17th where you want to believe it or not.
True
Nothing has been announced by Dice via the BF social media accounts, so all we can do is wait
june 17 reveal I trvst the plan
Marking them and you'll still be wrong
June 17 then
Still would be wrong
June 16th just so it can land on my wretched birthday
Something is happening on the 17th but I don’t want to talk about because I can’t discuss leaks in here
Tell you what, let's make a bet. June 17th they reveal a trailer...I'll send $100 to your PayPal @young jetty
Deal, you better keep your promise.
Also I only use cash app is that good for you?
I expect your $100 immediately
We’ll see who right
"Slide enjoyer" that'll make some people MAD.
We have a lot of based names in here for sure
I'm absolutely fuming right now.
They should would wear a cape, so they can be Super Mad
👀
i hope ryzen5600x+rx 6600 xt will be enough for new bf 
BF6 is not real
GPU will be tough, but it will be playable
if so i'll just add more rgb 😎
I really hope that when they announce it, they announce it in full, that is, a good trailer and explain things on a social level for the community. I hope that we can finally make our platoons with our tag, and a statistics system like in BF4.
Aight thanks for your answer
yes 😭
oooh i just started watching her recently!
He's right, among ''old school'' FPS players Battlefield is a dead franchise and ''new school'' players never even heard of the series or played it. There is a generation of players who never played anything other than Valorant, Fortnite and Warzone.
We should've seen the trailer at state of play or summer game fest imo, at least an announcement trailer with gameplay overview date at the end of it
Thank God you don't work in marketing
what the hell is a old school fps player
Your prior message makes the second one even worse.
If BF is not as known to a large younger audience, the worst thing they could do is announce it at the same time as dozens of others, one of those including a new COD.
Like happened with BF1, they are much smarter to wait for their main competition (COD) in the casual fps market to announce first, read public opinion and announce their game later at a solo event. Doing this is exactly how BF1 overshadowed Infinite Warfare.
IW, like BO7 is a game and era it's players are already tired of.
The next BF game has a massive opportunity to capitalize on this.
Read it, then delete this message
Thanks brother
PS360 era gamers
At least in the context of BF
the unction
know why they never played anything other than Valorant, Fortnite, Warzone?
Cuz those are free to play games and people are scared to put money into games thinking they will play 5hrs and dip
The free to play portion is the foot in the door type deal where people can try a game relatively risk free
BF never had a free to play portion before, so if the rumored third mode(s) are free to play, then that's how they will try to bring new people into the franchise
BF is a very popular game
BF1 is genuinely known as being one of the greatest shooters of the past 10 years, it’s a very popular game even now with videos about it garnering millions of likes, yes BF2042 isn’t well known but the series legacy is still living on. Kids these days will only play colourful and whimsical shooters and battle royales, they haven’t grown up the same way we have and it’s our job to make sure they play the games they miss out on. I am forcing my younger brother to play such games and he’s loving them
Just don’t even say a word anymore
Lablinima is just a doomposter who complains about everything
Thank you
Just like BF3 captured a new generation of young (console) playing fans who didn’t know about the franchise… this game is DICE/EA’s opportunity to bring in that next generation of younger fans. Been 10+ years since they’ve had a generationally defining game
No, it’s not when all those people jump whenever DICE reveals a new game. They may not play or like the latest games but they still go to bed every night crying themselves to sleep wishing for another modern BF game
Is the game pc controller friendly
hey uh what happened at gamescom 2011 i forgot
oh yeah they put bf3 up against borderlands 3 and modern warfare 3
and... planetside 2
Ya back when Battlefield was barely known outside the PC community
And last I checked they didn’t reveal the game at gamescom, they released their like 2nd or 3rd gameplay trailer
you'll never guess what position bf is in after console 2042 copies getting put into bargain bins within a month
You’ll never guess that brand IP doesn’t die with 1 bad game
it's two games and almost 8 years of irrelevance later
Ya BFV which sold ~7million in two weeks was really irrelevant. The cope
Is there more to this than her just wearing a June meme shirt for a month that people expect it to be revealed in?
No
She didn't tease anything other than getting people suspecting a June reveal.
She teased a June reveal my guy she did the same thing with 2042
How can someone lacking info tease anything? They are a small content creator, who absolutely would not be made aware of launch or release windows this much in advance.
Bingo
The June, Soon, Boom thing is just a meme in the BF community
Its the same concept as everyone posting the J. Timberlake meme on April 31st/May 1st
Made famous only because of 2042
He's teasing us...I just know it
Let's not forget that TheCadWoman's 2042 post was made a day after the "June Boom" post by BF
So she didn't tease that either 
that post was from 2021
i know
Twitter idiots just cant read
Exactly, she was poking fun at the meme/joke
i'm saying that BF posted "June Boom" on May 10, 2021 and she posted the selfie with the shirt on May 11, 2021 
people can't seem to understand dates 
Most BF players can't either apparently
It's : 3
Gonna : 5
Be: 2
May: 3
3523 > Written backwards is 3253 > 25 3 3 > 25 6
June 25th
I've cracked it

I know when the trailer drops
Arc Raiders community be like
it'll drop sometime before GTA VI drops 
They will release the Trailer when its ready 

Nah it will release the month before the month after this one
The day after that day before the next after tomorrow
Is there a labs going on currently?
It has just been revealed that the trailer for the new Battlefield will be released some day or time between now and the next 205 days 🙏
they're going to stealth launch this game in september
no
a parody MAGA hat in 2025 is so tone deaf
you can't talk shit about CoD if your game looks like the most generic 2020's shooter
CoD reveal proved him right though, people are making fun of BO27 in youtube comments
Yeah but this is different, how many more Black Ops and MW games will we get? Will we see Black Ops 30?
same with the I want Titanfall 3 and Halo bad comment lmao
yeah probably
big fan of kirk lazarus' earlier work
Call of Duty : Pacific Thunder
no, its more like you have no sense of humor
I'm sorry if your standards are that low
Parodying the most iconic political symbol of the past 10 years is low? Alright bro, butthurt over a hat lol
it was parodied to death 8 years ago man
Those new character models lookin real gritty🔥😮💨
overplayed
get new jokes vro 🥀
pax still looks a bit goofy
If you’re talking about the 2nd guy with face cover he reminds me still of bfv character models which looked a bit goofy but they look a lot better than they did during the pre alpha
can't wait for the first leaks of the cosmetic store and this community inevitably loses their mind
I'm expecting a skull mask of some kind
I think they already lost their minds over a mined cosmetic that ironically exists IRL
Might not make it to the game, may not even be paid cosmetics, but good luck ever making the denizens of reddit happy
which one was that?
I think it was a pistol grip with a skull on it
Magwell*
oh yeah... I mean it's goofy but it could be worse
Thank you
Nothing wrong with wanting grounded cosmetics tbh
CoD is a clown show now 
DICE is more than capable enough to make cool and grounded cosmetics too, I would buy some of the BP cosmetics if they were in store, antivirus Zain for example
I agree, a cohesive set of cosmetics is perfectly fine. I personally don't care much about aesthetics but you also still want some level of identity. You see skins for CoD and Fortnite and without context you wouldn't know where they're from.
Yep
they have plenty of grounded options to go for
like units from different nations
ponchofield
it would be funny if all the free cosmetics are cold war/GWOT stuff and you have to pay for modern gear
ngl I would LOVE some skins or mastery skins for gadgets

I don't think anyone asks for gold and black colored spawn beacons
imagine RGB gaming spawn beacon
Hi all, does it breach the NDA contract to see if anyone else is invited via non associated social media? Would like to see if I can create a squad with like minded people?
yes and you broke the nda with that comment either way
yes
can't share that you're in labs, can't talk about labs, nothing along those lines
Cheers peeps 👍🏻
Next time maybe read the NDA before you ask those questions
im sure there are ways to communicate with other people in labs once you get more infomation
To be fair I dont think its a sin to ask around.
When you get invited into Labs/BF Workshop, you will get invited to a dedicated Discord for Feedback and Bug Reporting
Its a sin if you break the NDA tho, Zeus himself will strike them down
there is direct contact info to talk to ea about it but idk
i just think people should read more, getting access revoked because you talked about it one too many times doesn't seem worth it
That I agree, that game looked generic and boring, forgot about it
.
I'm talking about like the RPG or M4 Recoilless etc
Any news on South America servers? Or are we gonna still be left out like always?
How long does it take for the invite to the discord?
Answering that would be breaking NDA, should one be subject to one.
Has ea announced new bf tests. I haven't heard anything. I'm in North America . If so I'd like to sign up.
Just asking if anything has been announced officially.
No more big tests, no
Thx
They’ll post about it as they did last time if there was
Np. I've been watching summer game fest and other streams with no bf news so. I saw a comment mentioning tests again. Why I asked.
Thx movement.
Anytime now, my invite will come in. I feel it! Only 6 months late, it's almost here!
Or not…
and you just lost access
Ok sweetheart xo
Until anything is mentioned here or by ea officially there are no tests. Stop spreading false info.
There isn’t a 13th month silly
goddamn europeans 
@spare wigeon I have heard that from YouTubers
Damn you Europeans. Lol. Lucky ones.
Dice doesn’t publish publicly what weekends the play tests are. We learn about it from people leaking their invite emails
As a C-130 technician I have a dream in which the new battlefield game will feature a C-130H/J or a CH-53 for the purposes of well, tactically airdropping or transporting people or stuff, the Blackhawk with 2 machine guns genuinely isn't enough
Speaking of CH-53 the king stallion is amazing, def better than chinooks imo
whens the next playest?
Don’t know and nobody can tell you
one Benjamins to someone to get me in,
I’ll ask David Sirland for you when I go to his house for brunch today
That's a late brunch for David. 😮
Am I blacklisted from the labs? 😔
The courier has yet to come at my door with an invite 😦
I'm curious what's a Gan?
I don't do anything with the invites, so I wouldn't know. If you haven't done anything that would be really out there I'd assume you've just been unlucky so far.
Please shadowdrop BF6, today 
Oh look at the time, it's my mum's cousin's daugther's birthday, gotta goooooo.
it's a riff on my last name and the word Gunslinger.
Aight didn't know if there was something actually or not, I assumed that what it was.
I didn’t even notice it was an a :/
🫡🫡🫡
why i always got email about update my prefrence for eaplaytesting i already updated it >:(((
Thanks for the hookups! ill tip the bouncer too, that's how I skipped the line into the LIV club
I miss the dlc that had an ac130, that shit went so hard but i wish it had more health
Now that my new pc is up and running i hope i get an invite now. Well tbh i dont think they have mentioned inviting australians (oceania region) just yet
So someone in reddit mentioned June 17 about battlefield game reveal, would it be true?
Would be cool if the game gets revealed on that date
Don’t go to the bf Reddit today lads
Just a bunch of complainers who don’t spare a second to engage in critical thought
stims...
so same as every other day
It feels like the wave of people against them just materialised out of nowhere
i could be gone for a month and jstnn_ would still be commenting blind hatred nearly every day
Its cos most people didnt play 2042 after they re-added classes, so dont know that they are not a problem at all (the stim itself)
I saw some pushback when 2042 added them but it fell off pretty quickly
Recharging stims should 100% go in the garbage can tho
When med pouches in 4, bandages in v all did the same thing
Oh for sure. They should push out, clear the map and have to return once that stim’s used up
they have a tried and tested stim system in 2042. Spawn with 1 stim, able to resupply another from a crate.
I'm going to blame the first guy that pointed out CoD has it
Those people seem to forget that assaults in bf4 had the same thing in the form of a med pouch, which someone could just use on themselves and never give to anyone else if they chose to
And my word the number of people calling anything about the game cod just drives me up the wall
Please dont bring logic into the equation here!!!
Also, assaults apparently being the kill hungry selfish ones when engineers were basically only about taking out tanks - hunting for kills - with their only support action being repairs
there is no logic behind these arguments, it's almost enitrely vibes based
Imagine my shock at a class system that works for how they intend you to play the class/game, instead of some larping roleplay version of how that class might play in real life!!
And based on 144p footage
‘Why no recoil!’
Maybe because they are pulling the mouse down
Also controller gameplay...which has less by default (I would imagine)
I honestly hope they don’t look at reddit too much
I wouldnt
Same
So anyways, any interesting discussions going on here
I'm just waiting for the official reveal...
We really need another labs post, while often draining at least it’s something new
yeah I wish they posted them more frequently
but they're probably gearing up for an offical reveal
Im guessing the next one will be class system part 2. Explaining signature weapons, sub classes and class perks.
Oh yeah this was part 1 wasn’t it
wonder if they'll address the feedback regarding weapons
No doubt they’ll mention it
Almost all of the feedback is useless, as nobody has a full picture on how they work or function
People who haven’t played the game discussing recoil is funny to me
We don’t know how it feels, and control is such a micro level ‘feel’ thing that you can’t determine it based on looks alone
People be like..."Where is the recoil. I thought they wanted to make it like BF4"
Don't click here!👉 https://bit.ly/2WkiHpw 👈
I'm playing on PC on ultra graphics, the video is available in 4K and 60FPS for you to enjoy the game in the best quality, I hope you like the video and don't forget to leave like and subscribe to help the channel grow! Thanks so much for watching! 😁❤️
Comment what you think about this g...
these same ppl hate bfv, a game with lots of (random) recoil 
i don't think they'll address in the way the ""community"" would want, because a primary reason to bring it up at all was to give time for the reactionary anger to subside before the inevitable reveal.
If it's brought up at all, they will probably just say "here are some further small tweaks we made based on testing" in a sanitized post that does not acknowledge any controversy.
If they are smart about it, they will try to give people the least amount of ammo possible to manufacture a reactionary social media campaign that reaches the eyes and ears of the masses
sounds about right
Or they will just schedule a beta, tell people to play it themselves and see if their concerns are warranted or not. (My money is on not)
Unless recoil was somehow stronger in bc2 backwards, I wonder what these people were playing to have this view
console
Even though console gets less recoil 
I only visit there to gather some information scrap nothing else
Wrongly sent, was about to remove that message
I’ve just had a thought
Every single class has a stim in bfV
One class had infinite
You're..... Not wrong
But one class having a single stim is ultra bad
Very bad 
Never mind assaults having infinite stims with med pouches
Okay that’s enough logic
i remember getting downvoted back in the day because i dared say it was ridiculously unbalanced that one class had infinite super fast heals while everyone else could only fully reheal...once. It was stupidly unbalanced then, but it's fine in BF2042 since everyone can fully reheal on their own over time.
Everyone can regen health in games before 2042 also. BFV being the exception
it's really funny how when that "stim" feature was at its worst (bfv attrition), far less people complained about it. Guess they were distracted by other complaints, even though i'd argue that was the biggest gameplay related problem in BFV's life
I don't play BF2042 much, but I've never even noticed people using stims. Outside of BFV they don't have a big impact like ppl think they do
You didnt regen heal back to full health in BFV, so it was less of an issue. More of a required mechanic
I think I was misunderstood, I'm saying the entire system was terribly unbalanced. The stims (medpacks) in BFV were horribly unbalanced because you couldn't fully regen health lol
It made it mandatory to play Medic if you wanted to flank, otherwise you were at a big disadvantage 
I mean, that was the entire point of BFV soldier attrition. You heal back to 60, but need a medkit to heal the rest. At launch you spawned with no medkit and had to get them from medics, or supply stashes. It, along with ammo scarcity, was intended to make medic and support players more essential.
This was changed post launch (as most people hated it), and every player spawned with 1
Correct, I'm saying that whole system was terribly unbalanced.
Unbalanced in what way?
Attrition was horrible and did the opposite of what they were intending to fix. They wanted people to spawn and die loop less but attrition actually hinders good players who die less by limiting their health, which is why everyone avoided the issue by just healing themselves as medic.
A learned lesson for sure. I guess it showed them that you cant force players too play a certain way, simply by limiting them in certain ways
"This is not "shooter" this is battlefield If you want "shooter" there is a game called call of duty apex legends Fortnite delta force"
Forced to zerg with all the blueberries unless you were Medic in pub matches. Flank as anything else and you'd be at a severe disadvantage after 1-2 fights since you would have little to no access to med kits.
Arent all other players under the same constraints tho. I think unbalanced is the wrong word
It's the definition of unbalanced as only 3/4 classes have the same restriction. This is made even worse if you go up against Medics while flanking as anything besides Medic lol
Idk and no one could tell u since that info is under nda
Damn bro, that was yesterday, if you took the time to reply to that, you could've taken the time to see someone already said that.
Do they have ucav in battlefield 6
omg ucav... no !!!! lol
Thank you
🫡
🫶🏻

i wanna play bf lab!!!Why haven't I received my testing qualification yet!!
Its a pretty garbage system yes
I swear they should have BF labs rolling for July 4th -the 24th
The recruitment for this test started on the 6th. It's already the 12th now, so the qualification has long expired.
Is there a test at the end of June?
Soooo I guess play test haven’t reached the series X yet? Still no email 🙄😭
or you just havent been selected
Been signed up for over 2 months. Ripping my eyes out atp. #unhinged
You're not guaranteed an invite
Obviously
does 6's work identically to BFVs? like is there a cooldown on usage, and does it stop healing if you get shot?
it is weird assault gets it but tbh the classes in general are weird this time around imo
This BF6 could have a lot more potential with these:
- Military Motorcycles (BF3)
- Pickup Weapons (BF4)
- Flamethrower (One of the pickup weapons, along with the DAO12 and M98B)
- Crossbow
- Thermal Sights of various types
- Sticky Bomb (BF1)
- Red Flare (BF4)
- Weather Effects (Rain, snow, or lightning, not tornadoes)
- Frontal Slash Return Animation (BF4)
- Grenade Return Animation
- Patrol Upgrades (Sprint, ammo, cover, explosives, like in BF3 and BF4)
Do you think we'll see this in the game?
No
Should they return?
- Military Motorcycles (BF3) - Don't see why not
- Pickup Weapons (BF4) - Yes
- Flamethrower - Hell no, less cheesy weapons please
- Crossbow - Don't see why not
- Thermal Sights of various types - Yes, but extremely high cost
- Sticky Bomb (BF1) - No
- Red Flare (BF4) - Don't see the point
- Weather Effects (Rain, snow, or lightning, not tornadoes) - Yes, but not tornados, just dynamic weather
- Frontal Slash Return Animation (BF4) - Absolutely not
- Grenade Return Animation - Yes
- Patrol Upgrades (Sprint, ammo, cover, explosives, like in BF3 and BF4) - None that change sprint or damage taken from small arms
This will probably get you banned if anything
I’d say the frontal melee should make a comeback if there was a helldivers-like mechanism but that’d be so gimmicky
why exactly ?
Youre the one who brought this up?
Bro we are millionairs around here , we can buy DICE , what do you think of when you hear middle east .? one of the most beautiful places on earth bro ? and we do especially me love BATTLEFEIELD
What?
can i send pictures in this group ?
love the uniform graphics gameplay is amazing. they just need to get back to the LOCKED classes and weapons
the game looks promising and i think it will be one of the best but just REVEAL IT GUYS ALREADY - we want it to be released THIS YEAR !!!!


They would break their NDA by telling you that
Anyone else here that saw the weird numbers and skull in JackFrags recent BF video outro?
yes and idk what that means and I dont want to lose my brain trying to understand, I'll just wait for the reveal
It pisses me off that big youtubers always act like “oh I don’t know anything, wonder what this is, oh I haven’t played it”
Like I know you’ve signed an NDA stop pretending bruh 😭
Knows they have signed an NDA > wants them to stop pretending
I dont think any of them should break their NDA/risk removal
If you don't give stims or something equivalent to assault then people won't play as assault, they will use support for self healing
No idea why people are so mad about it, assault has no purpose in the current class system anyways, taking away it's stims will make it completely useless
It has a purpose, just not one that greatly syncs with the other classes...in the way other classes sync with it and each other
Basically...
Assault > Get kills
Support > Get kills, resupply, heal, revive, reinforce
Engineer > Get kills, destroy armor, repair armor
Recon > Get kills, spot enemies, help spawn your squad safely
Id like to see assault be given more team/squad play utility outside just getting kills
They're adding tools to the assault so they can destroy cover more easily
But engineer can already do that pretty effectively
Plus all the vehicles
Do the other classes have smoke launcher?
well, with weapon restrictions they could make the other classes less potent at killing, which is what made it feel unique in the first place
I haven’t been in this chat in over a week and the first thing I see is some guy saying his country can buy DICE what the fuck lmfao
The additional potency for killing infantry comes from the anti infantry gadgets. When it comes to guns, that's not modern players expect or want out of gun balancing though. Gun balance is expected to be an even playing field
"country" is a bit of a stretch.
Thats worse than how it is now IMO
I don't see how it's that bad. It sounded to me like a solution to your point
if i'm an engie with a pdw i'd hide away from fights I can't contest, let assaults take it instead. So assaults become the primary infantry killers
All that would do is make assault the go to class by default
When their goal is to make players play the class for their gear, this is not a good direction. But at the same time, they seem to want assault to be the infantry killer "sweats" choice...its simply my opinion that assault should have more pronounced teamplay elements outside of kills.
I think something like a deployable cover would work well on assault.
Killing is teamplay
Read previous posts first. IMO, its not enough
Killing is one of the best teamplay aspects. It creates space for people to move, it takes pressure off engineers from getting shot while repairing or engaging armour, it allows objectives to be taken, and it reduces opponents tickets.
Ive not debated kills not being essential. If thats what they want it to be, im fine with it. I would just prefer it be different.
So many are getting anxious for bf6. Ea really needs to capitalize on it and do something. Showcase anything.
You can feel the excitement honestly. No announcement or anything about BF6 with everyone else doing showcases. The silence about what's next for bf6 is odd to me.
"Patience is bitter, but its fruit is sweet" 
True visual. Very true.
I like that idea, but I'm not sure how to give them a teamplay element that they cannot swap out. If they can swap it out they will, so it has to be mandatory lol
I dont think it needs to be mandatory
Then they will swap it out
I think you can give a class ability potential, that is not necesarily a requirement to playing the expected role.
Like recon having optional demo charges, drone, or Support having optional MP APS
i just think it will end up like BF1 Medic rifle nades. If it does not aid in killing, and it's not mandatory, then they will swap it out
The idea of a deployable cover on Assault I think would be viable for both assault playstyles, and teamplay for example
know what assault needs?
a grapple hook 
Deployable cover is like Dozer, but less annoying as is not mobile. Imagine how a dozer would play on a map like Redacted, if they are able to push a lane, place cover, allowing them to "Assault", while also allowing their team to push up.
If it's an optional gadget, it will immediately have the lowest pick rate of any Assault gadget
?
I think a better idea is a zipline launcher. Allows you to get a horizontal movement speed increase and traverse across gaps but won't let you abuse getting to vertical points otherwise unreachable.
I’ve liked the idea of giving them med kits instead of syringes to make them more of a medic role
So will defib be less picked on support, or rockets on engineer as they are "Optional"
IMO, a lot of assault players would take a deployable cover, which will shield them from harm. I know I would.
Assault players only want to kill. If they have access to anything like grenade launchers or shotguns they will immediately see those as more desirable options
If it's immobile, they won't want it
So your opinion is that they should further try to make assault the sweats dream?
And not in any way give them capability to assist their team mates, outside of just getting kills
Although in general I find in all bf games I play between each of the classes evenly enough to where even if it was the main infantry killer I’d still play other roles, so I find it harder to view from that perspective
I’ve always considered assault to be the ones pushing enemies away, which med kits acts as a way to get the rest of the team to move up with them, and if that progress up the map is marked by medkits then people may start to see the kit for the benefits they actually offer
oh no no. I'm saying you will have to force them to take a teamplay option
if it's forced upon them, they will use it simply because they have it
I dont think you need to force it. Im fine with assault as is (Role wise)...I just hope they get the ablity to assist the team in ways other than kills. If not, its a class ill end up never playing.
Id prefer for all classes to have some usability to me.
I'm thinking under the same logic as Medic being forced to have a revive option after BF1
Assaults in bfV were still kill hunters but just targeted vehicles, but that helps the team does it not? Even if you have a selfish assault hunting tanks for kills it still benefits. I’m not sure how they could make an infantry killer class have the same response from people when taking out people is still stopping them killing other teammates
Like sure every class can kill, assaults do it better and tanks can only be damaged by assaults, but idk how to get that same dynamic with modern assault kits
Unless other classes become weak at killing like other kits are weaker against tanks
In a combined arms game, yes. Killing vehicles, and killing infantry is important.
.
I'm honestly not sure if I agree with the killing of the Assault Engineer combo. I think the problem is that they wanted to combine Support and Medic more, which means that they would be down to 3 classes
Imo we are effectively down to 3 class roles, with Assault being an anti-role of sorts
IMO they want to optimize how teamplay works and how games flow...by combining ammo and meds into the new crate.
Shitty ammo and heal provisions have always been a problem in every BF game. Which is compounded by those those two things being the responsibility of two separate players/ classes. This change has potential to solve it, but at the cost of making the Assault a weird anti-infantry role
I think 2042 kinda shows why an anti infantry class doesn'twork in practice. Everyone regardless of class is already anti infantry. I think DICE wants their role to specifically be to break through lines, but in practice that's not possible since you just get canceled out by the assaults on the other team lol
Make sure you sign up for playtests if you haven't done so far! 🙂
done so and just checked the site, dont see any listed there >< but saw someone post about there being alpha starting tomorrow
The playtests are under NDA, so any info posted in this server that's not directly from EA can be seen as speculation from other users.
aaah makes sense, thank you!
he means he hates when they just dont clearly say "Im under nda so I wont say anything" instead of pretending they have not played the game or wondering how the game would be etc.
just to make content and videos about it
Doing that breaks said NDA
I think the point of the NDA would be you can't even say you were involved...that would break the terms
Innocent of what? Should BF creators just not make videos on BF until DICE decide to share info? Meanwhile others not potentially part of a program are allowed free reign to cover everything?
They are just "Playing the game" and by the rules.
McKay, Sundance and Zain are the best flankers in the game…?
probably read your emails, then delete this comment
Zain with his passive and airburst is a literal one man army
based on that thread I guess I won't get into playtest 😦
Its even funnier when people come here and break their NDA...while also having their platform user account linked on their discord. Might as well ask to be removed

Those are the best and just ask for the ban lol
Maybe that message should be updated to remove the parts about the 72 hour test, and make it more general to labs in and of itself
@severe anvil may I dm you a question?
true
Sorry, don't do DMs, also not working on anything related to Battlefield Labs invites.
okay no worries, i'll try to word it correctly here:
or if it is on PC, then it will automatically appear in your library to the account you signed up for. AGAIN, read your email instructions.
- to this point, if you've signed up for playtesting this will happen? OR is it ONLY if you received an email and responded to it?
I just realized you probably wont be able to answer it hahah as per your caveat
You need to accept the invite for Labs aka RSVP that session and then it will be added
The process is pretty straight forward and completely doable without any discussions in this Discord. 😉 Just need to make sure to read the emails and follow the process.
*allegedly
If you don’t get a invite with information regarding how to gain access or when it will happen, you won’t get it
thank you all!
to be fair...its one of those things where its straight forward if you know whats going to happen next. But you arent actually ever told (Allegedly) whats going to happen next.
That’s how previous playtests went that are already over and the product is released worked (at least for me and I am allowed to talk about it since the products are released)
But idk why so many people keep asking the same old question which everything is clearly stated in the mails, which has been said multiple times…. People really don’t like to read these days. Either Brainrot got to them or lazy af
one can presume that if they received an invite then they received all necessary info and simply need to read it
Nah, that would never happen. Gotta ask the discord
Im of the opinion that the labs warning channel should actually document the process of signing up better than it already does. You dont lose anything by informing people of what they can expect during the process of selection and RSVP'ing.
Because its VERY clear that people have no patience, and are not being given the info they feel they need
Tbh, I doubt they are dumb enough to not mention anything they need when they get invited. I NEVER had any issues or question regarding upcoming playtests and EVERYTHING was being told in the mails
It’s like they want a mail with a big text saying “YOU CAN PLAY IN 5 HOURS” and nothing else
.
the reason I was asking was because I did not receive an email and was coping lol
Bad Company 2 - Best BF
The amount of people making it through the process to join Labs and those that end up asking questions here is vastly different and in favor of the ones participating in the test. It unfortunately comes down to "how often can we post the same information until the very last person will read it". I get that it can be annoying when people ask the same questions over and over but it's part of a closed playtest system, I'm afraid.
Yea and with labs being promoted publicly, it made this situation worse in my opinion. If they would have kept it more secret, less people would have just signed up bc they wanna play the next BF and have no real experience how playtests and nda’s work. But then they would also probably have less players but less headaches
it's just my opinion but i do not think it's DICE or EA's responsibility to fix the education crisis in the US
Sadly, it’s not a US Only issue
Covid made people much dumber, the free time everyone got was too much 
you ain't wrong
We needed a critical mass of users to test. You can think about it (and these are made up numbers) in a way where if you invite 10.000 people only 1000 will show up for a test. So if you need to really test servers for example and you need 5000 people you have to invite appropriately.
okay, so where are people supposed to go to for BF labs questions if not the discord? that is pointed to when signing up? I don't think people are dumber, maybe lazier? come to the source where you can get an answer quickly even if it's not the place to get an answer
Yea I get that it’s a issue with needing a lot of active players and if they would just send a invite without announcing it, it would take much longer to gather feedback and especially from all different skill ranges
Again, there's a full process that you have to follow when you get invited to Labs, that includes contact options.
ignorance on my part is not bliss, because I want in!
(this is why updating preferences increases your chances, as it shows you are active)
but that makes sense that all the info would be in the email
In the FAQ they stated that they get a dedicated server that is private aka BF Workshop. This has also been said from T0TALfps on Reddit because many people got confused and he explained the difference from the real labs and the stress test
aaaaah thank you for clarifying
Tbh, I don’t think it works that way since most things in there don’t change at all during these years (at least for me)
It should consider u as active if you sign up for other playtest, send feedback etc, that that you update your preferences
But idk how it works or if they can even track it
SEA people doesnt even get into the invite pool 😭
I've updated them countless of time by now, still no invites
lol i think it's just a one time thing
so this BF Labs discusssion channel is to discuss the BF Labs news stuff and a place for all us Playtest exiles to wallow in self pity 😐
We also post updates to keep everybody outside of the test informed. That's also discussed on here as well.
Imo, Focusing on inviting players who actually already have played some of the previous Battlefield titles would result in a bigger turnout for the tests. One would think that this would result in less leaks as well, people who cares about their EA accounts and loves the franchise are less likely to break an NDA. But that's just my opinion.
I appreciate how you didn't disagree with the self pity bit lol
I would be playing BF2042 every day if it didn't stutter every 2 seconds 😐
It's difficult to give you a meaningful reply to his but I just want to make it clear that we've invited a wide variety of players and there are a ton of people that have played every Battlefield ever and for a lot of time. We just can't invite everybody that fits that profile. I totally understand that it can be frustrating to watch some of the leaked footage and think to yourself that you a) would play way better and b) would be super eager to provide feedback. It's a flawed system but unfortunately a perfect one doesn't exist. I appreciate the passion and hope you understand we're not excluding anybody to make them feel bad.
❤️ appreciate it Ganslinger
on the note of every battlefield ever, bring back Commanders and Titans from BF2142
Is there a chance to get in?
Yep, you can still sign up for it: https://www.ea.com/games/battlefield/battlefield-labs
Titans were some of the best times i've had in BF, and we could use an Aircraft Carrier as the Titan, where you have people using planes to get to the other side or there could be a central landmass between the two carriers/titans
Did that long time ago. I mean by contacting one of you guys and tell why I think I'm suited for this.
I don't have anything to do with invites to the program and we select people based on needs and profiles that were submitted in the sign-up. No need to add anything to that. As I said above, we can't invite everyone.
and there was a pretty nice Aircraft Carrier interior that could be used from BF4 (that mission was amazing btw)
Thanks for that anyways. Let's keep hoping for a chance to build Battlefield together 🙂
And just to also make it clear: Once the game is out at some point in the future that I cannot reveal, we're not done improving it. You'll have plenty of time to give feedback!
release date incoming!
And if 2042’s post feedback opportunities are anything like them it should be good
I had a blast writing as much as I did for those 
I know and that's a good thing 🙂
Makes sense why people feel this way though.
People want game they can enjoy, and to achieve that there’s nobody better to give feedback than themselves, so exclusion feels like the state of the game will be put in someone else’s hands
But if it worked out like that it would be impossible to manage
Do you have any info if there will be a Community Post regarding the Stress Test and how the Servers performed? Would love to know more about it
(you probably arent even allowed to say anything even if there will be a post :c)
I think that's a good question, I'll check with the team. I don't know if there's a ton of content outside of "This was good, this was bad" but there might be? Good suggestion!
Fingers crossed on this one 🙏
im assuming there was/will be a survey after each test, hopefully allows for long form feedback, but I can see in some cases where that wouldn't be warranted ie. stress test
No what i meant is that i wanna know if the Servers were able to hold the heavy load over the 72 hours, what they learned from it and if they have something to improve till the launch or next Stress Test
There are multiple ways we collect feedback from the test, yep. For stress testing there's not much that we would get out of a survey, as the underlying infrastructure stuff isn't visibile to players.
Just hearing anything about the game is good enough for me
The labs blog posts are fun discussion sessions (when people are actually having decent discussions)
yeah vs. no constructive feedback
“BF Vets deserve an invite” 🤓
I mean, it makes sense, they are likely to play more, be more invested in the game having played most if not all titles, so I can see where he's coming from
but I wouldn't go so far as deserve, but prioritized imo because they are your biggest fans
Would be very good to bring new people in too as it’ll let them experiment with ways to better tutorialise and push supportive actions, as most new people probably wouldn’t be used to working with others in any capacity, even though bf offers little teamwork to begin with
valid point, best of both worlds to have some new some old 😄
Did I write that? Bigger turnout for the tests if "Battlefield players" gets invited to the Battlefield labs playtest. Less leaks/NDA breaches if players have an EA account that they maybe have sunken thousands of hours in. That was what I wrote. No more, no less.
I just hope there won't be special dog tags (or calling cards) or whatever for those Who were lucky enough to be taking part in playtests since March...
Otherwise, as one of the unlucky here, my completionist OCD will be crying 😭
Deadass... I remember bf4 had one for playing the beta, but fair enough, everyone could get one
There were alpha/Beta/CTE dog tags in BF1 and also for closed alpha, open beta for BFV.
F
Oh boy, a scam
Not really, it's disingenuous because no one is asking for Apex movement
No where is it mentioning apex legends movement lol no one wants apex movement. Did you even read the article and comments?
can we expect a full reveal this year?
The fact V and BF1 are even grouped is a joke, BF1 probably has less movement than milsims.
You must not understand the chart lol
You guys are saying the same about Bad company 2
It's poorly formulated, based on unfounded beliefs and understandings of each game's mechanics, and ignores the history of titles with movement
ohh the movement is too slow its a milsim
at least most milsims have high movement granularity
BC2 was slow and especially clunky, yes. The only thing that offset it was a slightly higher TTK comparatively but its movement was very limited.
I hope there are a few Conquest Assault maps in BF6.
i dont need call of duty movement in bf but wouldnt mind being able to slide or duck in to cover when shot at just like i seen people do in the leaks
Cod movement isn't that fast imo
Right now the difference is like the dive and that's about it
the only crazy thing is like being able to slide backwards and shit
Oh yeah forgot about that, yeah that's stupid