#battlefield-labs-discussion
1 messages · Page 64 of 1
I didn’t say that to hate on the game. I still play BF4 and BF1 as I’m writing this. I said it based on numbers and player engagement. Steam charts aren’t the full picture, but they can show the difference.
what time is next test?
in 2 weeks
There is a strange thing. I submitted the battlefield labs application several times. Now the play test in program no longer has battlefield labs. Did I get banned?
Playtests In Progress,sorry
Just an incredibly small chance to be selected.
same mine doesnt show battlefield anymore
what does this mean
do you get an invitation via email or how it works for test labs?
Yes, via email
i know they pissed aboutt he leaks but tbf all the leaks have shown to me is this time dice has cooked
and the game looks amazing
@lyric thistle Will Next BF support 8000Hz mouse polling rates? That, and paid 120Hz servers as part of a premium edition (I understand those are very expensive servers), but doing it this way and having this would be epic.
8000HZ polling rate wtf
That's completely unneccesary.
(Plus I would not advise pinging staff)
If you say that it is completely unnecessary, either you are a console user or you don't know what it is.

Yes, the maximum you need is 120 Hz in the image... but when you go from 120 to 180 or 240 Hz, it is noticeable, you float on the screen, it glides smoothly as butter, well 8000 Hz is the same, the tracking is more precise.
I'm not talking about server tick rate in this instance.
A thousand updates for your mouse is really all you need.
My bad I misread. Still.
I tried the 120hz servers in BF1 Incursions, and they were incredible, they were very smooth, precise, and eliminated a lot of the feeling of death after cover.
120HZ would not be viable in a 64P match.
There's a reason why 5v5 had 120 HZ.
Which I think is pretty obvious in itself.
I have good bets the servers will be on 60 HZ for the next game which will already be amazing as is.
Every friend affects me, the better the quality of the server, everything inside also improves, I understand that these servers are very expensive for EA, but it would be nice to have a 120hz server for those who want a premium or special version.
We are not getting 120HZ servers for larger player servers until the infrastructure of the servers improve dramatically and our own networks.
In BF4 there were servers of up to 144hz for conquest, and we're talking about that old era, now it could be done, in fact, Sirland tried to put them in BFV but EA didn't want to, now there's plenty of technology and it supports it perfectly.
Awright, They're stupid expensive though. It's best to keep it consistent.
120 HZ all the time would be ideal.
I don't disagree but 60 HZ isn't even bad.
Who doesn't have fiber optics or good internet these days? The vast majority of players are prepared for this. At the server level, I'd buy your idea if it had 128 players, but 64 is viable these days, but it's more for financial reasons than for other reasons.
60hz seems like a good jump to me, but in the end, it's what we had in previous BFs, the jump that needs to be made is at least 90hz.
I'm in Australia and our dumbass politicians half assed the job because fibre optics was too expensive for them, Countries without a properly develop infrastructure are rather behind.
Though that wasn't the focus. I was speaking generally.
The game needs four very basic yet important things:
- Server finder
- 90 or 120Hz tickrate servers
- Squad creation and management (being able to display your emblem and tag on your uniform, vehicle, and player profile)
- Spectator mode (being able to cast matches or tournaments, while also being able to investigate and monitor the use of cheats)
What ping do you have? I'm from Spain, and we have very good internet, but it also varies depending on where you want to play. The European servers are in Germany, an EA error. There should be another location in the EU to improve ping and saturation. The same thing happens on other continents.
120Hz for a game on the scale of Battlefield sounds crazy
Ping doesn't matter we're ripped off by Telstra as they have a monopoly on us.
30 MS to Sydney.
I've been playing on Wifi for months 💀
Should get one of those powerlines!
the ping spikes are a test for my resolve
Ethernet all the way
i wish i had access to the labs.
You, me, and nearly a million other individuals 
Que me quedo sin comer porque no hay luz 😭
I heard BF games always had issues past 1000Hz anyways, I didn't noticed because I already use 1000Hz all the time tbh
idk why you'd need such high polling rates anyways
It's like FPS, there are diminishing returns but more is always better
I'm not even using an old mouse either I'm using Basilisk X Hyperspeed, it's pretty modern and doesn't support past 1000Hz lol
Almost all pc games have issues past 1000hz. 8000hz mice are scams. Like buying an 8000hz monitor, but the fastest gpu can only give you 1000 fps.
DICE give me access to labs, and my life is yours
id give both me nuts my son is due in 3 weeks i gt 2 not im done with kids haha
Any idea where in Discord does DICE post the next play test notification time and date?
🥶
not in this discord or at least it's a locked invite only channel in this discord 
they won't say when tests are, but only post information regarding what the upcoming tests are about (once every month or so)
Okey doke, cheers for that. 🫡
A suggestion for conquest ticket scoring for the next game.
For the last 50-100 tickets, make sector dominance or kills be the only things that reduces tickets.
Make it so capturing a sector and reducing opponents tickets by 5 on capture doesn't make a game end in a really anticlimactic way. (As is the case in 2042)
I love to see leakers getting access while honest player with 1000+ hours on the franchise dont
Yep, played every BF game and yet the dude that can’t even aim properly gets in
I understand that they want a variety of people so they can get a variety of feedback, but it just seems to me like they made literally no research into whether some of these people actually played battlefield before. A lot of of these people just wanted “content” for their social media.
Legit watched an 11 min video of a guy die 27 times and get 2 kills. Barely knew how to move and shoot, crouch walked the whole time. Same type of person who sees any type of movement or jump and cries that the game is “too fast”
Idk I switched to a Darmoshark M2 Pro with 8k and noticed a HUGE difference
He's just I M M E R S E D
I have +6000 hours in battlefield I deserve an access?
You’re not special, stop playing victim
You understand that you need new blood/players for the franchise to succeed. Relying on nothing but people who have played the series is just a self consuming snake
how hard to bring back the MEC faction?
If they listened to the community to begin with, they never would’ve gotten the failure that is battlefield 2042
honestly, the base MP would not be the first stop for them. most ultra casuals/"tourists" of IPs defer to the f2p portion of game, like fortnite and warzone
which is what will probably happen with the rumored third free 2 play mode being made by ripple effect
but like, at the same time, once a new shiny comes out, they all dip anyways 
Ultimately, if the game doesn’t appeal to your community, the casuals aren’t gonna play it either. And the last game didn’t appeal to anyone.
Cope harder, that’s not why 2042 failed
I’d argue open betas etc can be counted as a f2p portion of the game. And have largely filled that role of free entry point into a series for the last ~10-15 years for a lot of games
Thinking back to the BF3 open beta, how many people you think got pulled into the series due to that. Especially among console players
Yeah. Imo 2042 mainly failed because a lack of clear direction, a ton of launch bugs, and some other smaller missteps
BF 6 is clearly looking like a continuation/iteration on BF V gameplay with a modern skin
The “community” who hated BF V:
Oh shit DICE is cooking with this, taking us back to BF3/4
I just hope the takedowns are contextual and there's a different version for back, left, right, and again for crouched/prone players. I also hope you're able to just press melee and instantly kill prone players from any direction, like in 2042 
I do NOT, however, wish for the front counter-takedown from BF4. that there was some b******t (censored to appease the automod!!)
i think they give access to giga casuals intentionally, i remember being sent a hardline beta invite as a kid with like 100 hours of bf4 total
I hope all the leakers get there toes stubbed at the metal part of their bed at night. Must be nice getting an invite while most true Battlefield players don't even get an invite to put in solid feedback 😒
You are hallucinating, I give my feedback that’s all 😉
4/5 out of thousands of people have leaked, this is a tad dramatic.
“True battlefield players” 🤓
Everyone of you who play this card should be forced to post your stats
2.0 k/d min and top 10% SPM required
Hey everyone, what if they added the cast of Top Gear in the next battlefield game
I’ve been thinking this as well. I’m in another discord with around 500 ppl in it and the folks that got invited are all dogshit at the game, massive 0.5 KD casuals
I feel like the survey we all took has a BIG BIG impact on decisions lol
It’s funny too cause I’ve legit been invited to EVERY single alpha I’ve ever applied to for other fps/competitive/multiplayer games
Good thing this is a pre alpha 
realistically the game is coming out in like 6 months
You’re delulu. Unless GTA 6 gets delayed to 2026, EA keeping this bun in the oven
didn't it already get delayed once?
It’s probably been internally delayed multiple times
And the pc version is 100% “delayed”/pushed back
Tbh, i doubt it, I'm guessing sometime spring 2026 to stay away from the extra big hitters in fall (BL4, GTA, Ghost of Yotei, etc)
Marathon 
That's the lowest on the list 
Actually
Not even on the list 
Bungie will have to go to great lengths (pun intended) to make that game not die in 4-6 months on release
*weeks
So true
Interviews with their devs dont make the game seem promising to me TBH, and im a player who is already on the fence with regard to a bungie made extraction shooter with that type of aesthetic and setting
Yeah, I get that. If the devs can’t even sell the vision clearly, it’s hard to stay confident. Especially with Bungie trying something so out the blue. and the aesthetic definitely isn’t going to click with everyone.
That’s why 2042 failed tbh
There was a video of Shroud talking about how they didn't took any of their feedback despite EA paying them to playtest the game
Its more so that they dont seem to understand wha makes extraction shooters enjoyable for the casual player. the game will die if it doesnt have a good gameplay loop for casual play
That’s what most extraction shooter’s fail to do. Make it fun and enjoyable for a casual player
In my opinion
Cos tarkov players for sure arent gonna jump ship for this game, so hardcore players will stay there, or in other future alternatives like breakpoint arena breakout/Delta Force
Its rare that I have no desire to play a bungie game TBH, I have over 2k hours in Destiny 1, 2 and most of their Halo games. But here we are.
We don’t know what their feedback was and shroud has been stupidly wrong on what should be in fps’ for years
More than he is right
He's still a good FPS players, he knows what he's talking about, even if he's not a BF player 🤷 Blame EA/DICE for inviting him instead of BF players
That shroud video is also really ambiguous, cos he mainly says they asked for opinions on cosmetics. Which is a similar story to what other creators have said.
It didnt seem like they asked for direct feedback on certain parts of the game, just for general feedback (Most of which wouldnt have been able to be added to the game for a launch anyway)
Good players doesn’t automatically equate to good feedback
Most pro athletes couldn’t describe why what they do is successful
*Looks at shrouds actual game...which is terrible...and shutdown after 4 months

The irony of Marvel Rivals coming out at the same/similar time...and even Shroud played more of that than his own game. Hardly a striking endorsement for it hehe
Even though Shroud was apparently only a consultant...but many of his videos make it seem like there was more involvement (Maybe there was, but there was some drama about it a while back)
Hammond would get his hovercraft stuck in a ditch, james would be flying a transport heli while jeremy operates the RPG out of the passenger seat
hey, so i registered for BF Labs day-1 when the queue was in thousands, though i waited my turn and registered, although now i see that some people received an email after signing up to the playtest, meanwhile i didnt receive anything after signing up
Yeah, its cause it's random 
It's not guaranteed
it's like winning the lottery, don't be discouraged
no
i mean an email with a confirmation that i signed up for the playtest
not the one that i got in
Oh the registration confirmation? Yeah that shit bugged
keep gambling
When is the next play test wave?
Hella goofy like its apex legends or some call of duty
If that was the case no one would play 3 or 4 or bad company 2 lol recoil was crazy in that game
Gives it more of a intense and suspenseful and immersive gunfight no one wants laser beams
make it like old rust recoil
what does that even mean?
You wouldve had to play rust before they changed it
Was much harder and more rewarding then they made it way too easy now its boring
3 or 4 did not have crazy recoil. they had crazy spread and/or suppression
was stupid easy to keep the recoil centered
Bf4:
Bf4 has the best gunplay imo
its kinda unreal that I've watched about 6 hours of leaked bf6 gameplay at this point and that shit still isn't open to the public
Not too much recoil but there's spread which nerfs engagement distances even if your good at it
It was perfect tbh
i woulda kept my mouth shut too ab being in the playtest tbh
Not hard to understand and learn
Yeah they might as well drop the nda
like bro i kept the sign up queue thing open on my computer for so long to try and get in bc i love bf so much and i still haven't gotten an invite
smh
I imagine that they're gonna treat bf labs as a live service title when it goes to full public testing and keep it that way until release
sell people stuff, then when full release comes around "you have to actually buy the game now"

It random selection
i love how people still think sign up order means anything when they said it has no impact on selection a day after sign-ups started
Who cares
90% of people didnt even watch the video or read anything before signing up
they just want to be a part of something
I applied a long time ago but still haven't received an invitation for trial testing(
Maybe someone knows if they are still recruiting?
It's random selection and random invite waves. Not guaranteed
And your odds go down as the amount of experience you said you have with fps games and games in general on the application increases
I know our feedback doesn't mean shit since we are not in the labs but
does anyone else feel like the soldier classes are too similar?
like there's barely anything differentiating them
plus, the support doesn't look very supporty
probably because it's going to be like BFV where all the cosmetics will be shared between classes
Not enough footage or info to know for sure. They have also not done any testing for things like this, so my guess would be the class soldiers/sillouettes are not final
imma just wait until we get more info or for an open test or beta (demo)
honestly, soldier models is the last thing that should be worried about at this moment 
also from what I've saw they're implementing the class webbing system that was cut from V
tf is class webbing
all classes were supposed to get something on their model to distinguish them from other classes
I think medic was supposed to get crutches like in 1
ah
As BSOD said I can’t possibly come to a conclusion without actually playing them, but I do still feel weapon restrictions would be worth having to alleviate this somewhat
if going off the current list of guns, i don't think that class restricted weapons are happening tbh 
3 snipers only? wtf recon going to have locked as well? DMRs?
I only need 2 snipers tbh
oh god please no
although
Im not gonna judge anything off leaks from pre-alpha. will wait to see what they cook.
I mean
minus the gloves that changed from outdoor research gloves to just some oklays
One think I can’t wait for is to have my tank turret instantly disabled by the top down engineer mine
That’s going to be just so fun
Ok, that doesnt make me change how im gonna judge something tho
Im fine with vehicles disables, if it means they are allowed to make tanks OP as fuck
it would be funny if we can jump on top of a tank and play an anim that opens the hatch and uses your equipped HE/fire nade and toss it inside the tank 
Same deal with vehicle attrition via limited ammo supply. All good as long as the map design is good, and the ammo you do get is strong
unironically would be cool
Modern tanks dont open like this, so probs not gonna happen
Wonder if they’ll bring back angular damage multipliers
i don't know the ins and outs of irl tanks lol
i just play game and shoot people/make vehicles go boom
but would still be funny to have as an option 
Toss a nade down the barrel 😛
lemme stick my recoilless barrel against the tank barrel and launch it inside 
the BF3 placeholder
nuh uh
outdoor research overlord gloves
never seen again until BF2042, Dozer wears them
oh right mb
Most sane BF take ever. I love you! ❤️
of what iv seen atm im already hooked i do enjoy 2042 but it could massivly be better still
It just looks like the game that should have come after BFV. Back to modern, using all the learnings from previous modern and WW games to make the best possible experience.
we hope it's the best possible experience 
As opposed to 2042, which basically abandoned past game learnings (At launch), while chasing something no one especially wanted.
that's what happens when you try to create a game that appeases to the "tourists" 
a game for everyone is a game for no one 
I was cautiously optimistic about the next game before labs and leaks, that has only improved since then
Still need to see more to be fully sold as to us "Being back"
Forgive the wishful thinking but I’m throwing this one out: instead of a war zone copy cat, dice should set the trend and make a resurgence mode (i.e. eliminated by squad wipe) in middle of actual conquest matches. 4 squads two for each team that enter the field with different objectives. Completing missions (could be different for each squad) to creep closer to the main objective (common for all squads). The squads could be considered mercenaries and only one squad could complete the last objective. Last surviving squad gives you a win. Each mission could give the squads commander-like perks that help them in the next mission but also benefit their main team. The main mission could have a lasting effect on the conquest matches like reforming a flag in favour of the winning squads team.
If EA is insisting on wasting money on a battle royal. Might as well try something crazy that better fits the franchise
As someone who only plays Conquest. This doesnt really sound logical to add, for how the flow of the conquest game mode is. Either that or its not all that well explained.
I'm not sure I'd want it instead of conquest, but I did once play an airsoft game where there were so many people they made a 3rd team as a disruptor team that had it's own objectives. I could see battlefield making this sort of thing.
Sounds somewhat similar to a mode we've already had
That kinda sounds like the gauntlet mode that was leaked
Can u resign if u missed invation email?
😭
youre probably already signed up so not really
They need to re-add Obliteration from BF4, that mode was so much fun
thats why you gotta check daily like an obsessed freak
Also, make it so when you play RUSH when the round ends, the teams switch for the same map, I loved that in BF3, if you got steamrolled by attackers, you could try and beat them defending
it was fun but it died
for some reason the last time i got into an obilteration match was on ps3..💀
Genuinely no point in checking everyday, they'll add you to a discord channel on here when you get selected, so you'll know you got it XD
BF4 on PS3 was just so painful
how would they know your discord username?
Is the email you use for Discord the same as the one they have?
Also, Idk if they would, I just assumed
I've been playing this franchise since I was 12, I'm 37 now (38 this year) I'd love to help shape basically BF 3.2
that means they would know the discord profiles email which is still 💔
wow you are old
i wish i could experience bf2 back in the day but sadly im eastern european and young lel
Sandbox mod was so cool
it was like Gmod for BF2
Hosted by a group called "The Sir Community"
Should youtube search some of their old Machinimas
Pretty sure Sir Elxx works for DICE now
or did idk if he still does
He was a softly spoken quiet swedish guy who spoke very few words
Obliteration fun pkayed it couple weeks ago
I've been considering playing BF3 on PC, because playing on PS3 would be painful, like 80FOV and dead servers
Bf3 is shut down on ps3 n xbox 360
Unpopular opinion time; I actually unironically enjoy BF2042


XD
i mean its solid if you ignore every battlefield that exists ever
Bf4 best game hands down
Everyone forgets how broken that game was at launch, literally bricking consoles and PCs with levelution, the netcode took 3 years to fix, and was only REALLY kinda fixed during the CTE years
That game was a mess at launch - But now its revered as one of the best
BF4 still has 15% no reg while playing 
BF3 was THE best BF experience
Suppressor P2000 muting the entire server was gold
people forgetting hardline existed and has overall the better amount of good maps and better gunplay than 4
I personally believe if they took what BF2042 is now, removed the specialists as a group, but left in the gadgets, and gave the game a gritty BF3 vibe, without the blue tint and God Rays of death, it would be GENUINELY the best experience.
I play BF3 portal modes, and with the 2042 movement mechanics its just peak battlefield
The ol strat of how to win Siege while losing just by triggering the levolution and watching most of the players crash. Good times.
I remember my ps3 kept freezing completely lol
Its why COD2019 was such a breath of fresh air, because it took the COD formula into more of a gritty game, and introduced limited advanced movement, but increased the skill ceiling exponetionally
mw2019 was good, but the sbmm and excessive RAA made it way less enjoyable
ground war was the only half decent mode in that game
If you play BF3 portal game modes with 2042 movement you will literally never unsee the glory of that game
Kinda worried about the mounting they're adding in BF6, hopefully the TTK stays similar to now, otherwise you wont be able to push properly
ttk will probably be in the 250ms-350ms depending on the gun and the range that gun is shot at
Take me back to S1-S5 days of Apex. No forced crossplay, no one knew how the RAA worked, legend design wasn't power creeped to insane degrees, cheating wasn't anywhere near the levels it is now.
long range will probably go to 500-750+ms
Like DICE if you read anything, please, COD2019, was a brilliant game, but power positions and mounting made it feel like COD Ghosts. If you give players mounting it might turn into some crazy bs*
Also, please make it so that the servers dont favour high pings for hit reg, like you do in 2042, the server tick rate is abominably slow on now, and if you get shot at by somebody who's ping is only 10tics higher than yours, you lose the gunfight.
Its genuinely painful being killed by a Delta 99+ Tick
Knowing, the server decided to let them win D:
That shit drives me nuts, people playing on the McD wifi having 50% chance to get bullets registered to them but they can kill you miles around cover in a single frame
Bro, dont get me started on diving behind cover only to be killed just as you round the bend
Hope sliding is pretty much like bfv
Its why the slide cancelling is so useful
Also dont add hitboxes tied to player movement like BF4, spamming crouch to mess up your hit boxes is low skill cheeze
if the dolphin diving is similar to BF2, everyone is cooked lol
that sh*t was awful
Please bring back naval combat
Ok navel combat was just Titan mode realistically
A game mode like Titan mode would be dope
Obviously couldnt really be titans, I guess
Maybe a map, thats like an island, with missle silos on it, and then two Aircraft carriers in the water surrounding it, you capture missle silos and then have to storm the carrier from the island.
🤔
Could even just be static bunkers too
They just need to make a functional game and then we can see whatever experimental shit they have planned.
leaks may looks good, but keep expectations in check
BFV was a let down, BF2042 released poorly, its genuinely amazing now
I don't have doubt in their abilities. The community always complains about shit so it's difficult to get a bead on what needs actual improvement.
BF1 was amazing, aside from the final year TTK rebalance out of nowhere
bye bye muscle memory
Bf5 for all its issues made me take the games more seriously and improve.
BF Hardline was a nice change from the usual, but it wasnt my kinda schtick
BF4 was a LITERAL mess for 3 years, with constant weapon balancing and TTK changes until the CTE literally saved it
BF3 was just so much fun, the netcode was awful, but the gunplay was top tier,
BF2142 was janky af but genuinely innovative and fun
BF2 was so much fun, and the mods made it amazing
BFVietnam was just as nuts as Bad Company (there was a seat on a Huey that was placed on top of the rotors and you could blast fortunate son out of the speakers whilst flying around)
BF1942 was the birthplace of this franchise, but its super dated now, the planes were peak dogfighting
😄
IM OLD DICE
https://discord.com/channels/140933721929940992/909508309269221466
PC - EU
Any game mode
Naval combat like bf1's heligoland. Bf4's paracel storm
Add a lot of naval vehicles, like cruisers, boats
How about an aircraft carrier
That ain't happening
Player behavior and expectations is far different than what it was back in 2004
Dice isn’t going to let 4-6 per team players fuck off running a cruiser/destroyer/submarine while everyone else is on land
Now, I want more maps where you start on the ship and make your way over in an APC/RHIB etc and have to fight from the beach front.
But controllable ships, nah
yeah, naval combat would be pretty tricky to keep balanced, because if a ship gets damaged, they can f off out to sea and the only that can consistently hit them would be a jet
Hey everyone, what if they added a Denny's at every objective in conquest for the next battlefield game
I want The American Dream to make a stupid cameo somewhere.
DICE needs to make cameos again.
Fuck that, Waffle House
Not until Harada and Namco brings it to Tekken first
Battlefield should get in line for that 
how do i play it on ps5?
well if you got the invite via email, there should be information there or somewhere it links you to do it
If you did not get an email invite, you gotta wait
ahh okay
how long on average does it take to get in the labs?
Any range from 2 weeks to never
The less interested you are in getting in, or the more you hate BF, the more likely it is you’ll get invited
Its like a watched kettle 😛
It really does feel like they are inviting anyone but anyone who’s played any previous bf
Plenty of "veterans" and good players are getting invited. they just arent talking about it.
if you are talking about me you're wrong
I hereby officially state that I no longer desire to play battlefield
It didn’t work
Survivor's bias
We only see bad people playing because anybody good at the game wouldn't want to risk being banned from all future testing
also, shows that they invited alot of people who don't care about being banned at all
which is a shame
i dont think those people care what the game turns out like either
I feel like their lack of pushback on the initial leaks caused the mass leakage with the latest test.
Nobody's getting in any legal trouble so there isn't any actual consequences to leaking
there's too much leaks to do any legal stuff now anyways, all they can do is ban them really
Fair. It's kinda too late to do anything besides for banning everyone that leaked
It’s a handful of people… y’all are acting like 90% of the labs are thumbless BF haters that are leaking
it's not a handful of people tho lol
Fr. Even if 100 people leaked, that's only .01% of testers (I'm assuming around 10k people got invited)
they dont share how many testers there are so who knows, but despite people's footage being taken down, two new pop up, its like a hydra
im not sure they can stop it at this point, but oh well, i dont think the game release will perform worse beause of this anyway
it's likely still at 4 digits
they said they'd start with thousands and later on tens of thousands
Even if it's only a few thousand, that's still less than .1%
i know, just a small correction
You know I'm kind of hoping that they bring back rotating weather conditions like in BF1.
It's nice having the fog of war to encourage snipers to change up their play style.
Not some dinky tornado that we have in 2042.
Hourglass has the sandstorm and manifest has rain
Sandstorm is fine
Rain is whatever
Fog is where it's at
Earthquakes that change up the map would be an interesting idea though.
Dunno how feasible it is on a coding scale.
yeah I'd imagine that would a nightmare to even conceptualise even in the absolute perfect scenario where everyone has the exact same extremely high end hardware 
Would probably be hell on graphics cards, even for high end, I'd imagine 
Orbital also has rain, hail and thunderstorms.
Duke Nukem 3D was a first foray into it, which is what made me think of it in the first place 
I don't think it would be very dynamic which is what we want
If it was basically just causing one major structure to collapse then it wouldn't be very different from Shanghai in bf4 I would think
i remember there was a YouTube 2042 shorts meme where the quad bike scene was a parody of the Shanghai building collapse and everyone said "gg map is ruined" and left
but yeah i think earthquakes is a bit too difficult to put into a battlefield game ill be honest, but it's a nice idea to look into. destructible buildings is still great tho.
Will there be sixth-generation aircraft in Battlefield 6? just like j36 j50 f47 etc
Just like in Battlefield 4, the J-20 was already in action in the game even before it entered service.
no
It can definitely be added to enhance the gameplay and fun
3 and 4 had good recoil that you can learn to control, bad company 2 recoil was crazy yes
Can we have loadout presets?
Hoping bf6 aculy comes out with ea laying off tons of people and canceling games
More people got added to the BF team from this occurrence. So I wouldnt worry about the next game
THE GREAT IMPORTANCE OF HAVING THESE 2 FUNCTIONS IN BF6
PLATOON CREATION and MANAGEMENT (being able to create and display our emblems or logos, as well as an identification tag on the soldier's uniform, weapon, vehicle, and player profile, as well as the community's nationality flag)
Reasons:
Special bonds are created with the members of your community.
Fighting and representing your community gives you extra motivation in every match.
You give the opportunity to make your community known to other players, attracting future new members by seeing the flag of the country where they are from.
Competitions are created between communities, giving you the opportunity to create matches or tournaments in any game mode.
SPECTATOR MODE:
Vital to better combat cheaters and at the same time be able to broadcast team matches or tournaments, cast with narrators, or simply want to learn from player X by watching them play. With an option to take photos and create albums or game reports, epic series.
If EA or DICE wonders how Delta Force keeps its players and has reached such high peaks, it's because of things like this, having spectator mode gives a lot of life to the game for a long time, and at the same time attracts more players and keeps them in, if BF6 adds these 2 functions, it will be unbeatable, but it also depends on us to demand it from the developers to have it, and not just a few demanding it.
I would love nothing more than a photo mode of sorts
which spectator / replay would fulfil
so I concur
So the server browser for the main game is still not confirmed?
There's nothing official, I hope we have it, it would be a big leap for BF6, they're taking the best from other BF, they should also take this.
3 too much
Remove snipers, remove shotguns, recon should carry DMRs
Increased skill floor not ceiling
Fast TTK, insane footstep sounds, SBMM, RAA. Literally made for lowest skilled players. Too many annoying gadgets too.
Jetpack CoDs had higher skill ceiling due to movement imo
Overpowered autoaim
99% of what we know isn’t confirmed. It’s all just leaks that could change with every playtest
I want persistent servers with map rotation even if there is no server browser 
I don't want to be sent back to main menu only to find a match on the same map over and over again
everybody wants this dude, theres a reason they dont want to "add" such a thing
There are persistent servers in 2042 even without server browser, FNB playlist is persistent for example
That should be the default
TDM used to work on persistent servers also. Modes like those, including FNB modes are all built using portal.
IMO, the reason more modes dont swap to being built on portal and use persistent servers. Is a bug in the game that stops player from being able to join, replacing AI.
In FNB modes, it always happens that one team will end up full of mostly AI. Seemingly because players are no longer able to join that server to replace them.
Solution: Remove AI 🤷
Keep them to portal
DICE should bring back BF3 gazelle jumping imo 
The only way to have server persistence in 2042 is to have the mode be built in portal
I don't even know of AI are the issue, or the servers themselves.
For 2042 yes, but BF6 is still pre alpha, it can be done imo
The above is just a guess. Maybe the actual issue is the servers, even persistent ones become unjoinable eventually
Next game for sure needs persistent servers. 2042 without them is such a shitty experience. And matchmaking directly after a round ends is not a good enough solution.
👆
Proper replay systems would help the game out so much with content creation, cheat detection, and tournament play.
It's insane to me that isn't a guaranteed inclusion to every FPS
Probably because esports isnt as big as people think it is.
Replay systems are completely unnecessary for a BF game IMO. IF we got replays at the cost of some other part of a game, I would be pissed
Why would a replay system be unnecessary? Content creation and getting POVs and having camera pans/other replay related stuff for CC and the like would make it easier and give more options for creative freedom?
Instead of having to go into a portal/empty lobby that's running the map you got a clip on and having to recreate certain scenarios
Just add a spectator mode. Replay system is totally not needed for such things
I dont even know if Frostbite supports such things, but I can imagine it would require a heavy investment to support, for something not a lot of people ask for/want
IIRC, it took unreal over 5 years to build engine support for it
Im not against replay systems either, peopel just need to be realistic with asking for stuff for the next game
Frostbite engine possibly has one anyway, at least for UFC5 with dynamic KO replay
So there is some sort of a replay system, and since they've been using frostbite since bc1, they've probably done some sort of work on it
How else would they get some trailer footage that isn't pre animated
They have replays even in online?
Id also guess that 1v1 fighting game replays with no dynamic destruction/game/map states is significantly easier to do that a 64p game
True
But there is something to build off on if they ever decide to it
And having it be an option would be really cool
I mean, they have a whole team dedicated to just working on frostbite 🤷♂️
16 years on frostbite, they have to have some bones there 
Would be more useful for a game life EA Football, but I dont see people asking for this feature all that much these days. It probs not a priority
which is sad tbh
it's a great feature to have creators and non creators alike
Noone I watch for PUBG really uses replays at all TBH. Maybe others do tho
Tech isn't there yet~~(ignore BF2 having replay systems~~) 😛
BF2 was on the refractor engine i'm pretty sure 
BFV had some sort of replay system too if I remember correctly
it did not
GeForce experience had the "auto-clip" feature that can be used to auto clip certain things that occur in game, but no actual replay system afaik
That was a system built off the nvidia SDK
and yeah, it was just for capturing video footage of killstreaks, ETC. I dont think I ever used it
but either way:
DICE (if you do read these posts in this channel lol)
A replay system would be cool in the future 
I mean cod has it's own killcam system and halo has it's theater mode
I can only imagine the outrage in the BF community if they added kilcams here. 😁
you mean hiding snipers/corner campers would outrage 
Especially is crossplay console x PC is still in
Does the heli still feel like its on rails?
No, keep the old system, I don't wanna see what the other player did to eliminate me, I really don't care, skip and play
Hey everyone, what if they added Walter White and Jesse Pinkman as cameos for the next Battlefield game
I wouldn’t say so
But also never felt that was the case before either
If anything the attack heli feels more like it is
The 22-minute gameplay in 1080p has been leaked again on CAPSTONE, and looking at it, Sector B is very simple. There should be more houses to have more infantry options, but I would say in all the flags, with this level of destruction, it becomes more necessary to have more houses and thus have more combat zones.
We cannot discuss leaks here
- Leaks - The sharing and discussion of leaked information will be closely monitored. There is to be no discussion of leaks that are circulating in small groups, feel like hearsay, and/or don't match known information around the product as well as no downloading/direct re-sharing of game footage that has been leaked elsewhere. Players can however discuss leaks that are seen as widely available or have been covered by mainstream media sources, but this is entirely at the moderator/staff team’s discretion.
Capstone leaks are not widely available, nor covered by mass media...and are being removed as soon as they appear on video and social platforms. Those are clearly not allowed to be discussed
They should filter out the maps of the game.
Word filter
You know
But then that'd screw that up LOL
there is a difference in allowed to be discussed and quite literally everyone knowing about it
Yeah, seems like a bad idea. People shuld just use common sense.
I dunno. The community is annoying.
They give an inch, community takes a mile
There's also the matter of spoiling it for everyone else but that it's own thing.
sure they DMCA the footage but most people seen some form of clips from it and or saved the gameplay to a google drive
They still can still limit how far it spreads.
yea it kinda ruins the actual reveal
ofc
Yeah, im actually sick of the amount of leaks now TBH. I dont even go on the sub anymore for risk of having other major surprised ruined.
It was fun at first but now it's like can you guys get the hint.
Its mostly the data miners that are ruining it tho.
I got to see things I wanted (like the guns) and that's it.
It would be nice if they encrypted the files.
And disabled shadowplay.
They could have heavily limited the spread of information.
doesn't matter on EA games, datamining will happen no matter what you do
Keep in mind I know that external recorders and shit exist too
if they have the game files through a friend or whatever then its pointless
But stil it would heavily limit the spread.
Players would just capture with external capture card. None of this is an efective fix for leaks
I will reiterate again and again it would at least heavily limit it instead of there being leaker number 80 or some shit.
Cause then they could focus on that leak and deal with it.
I think they gave up because they realised the positive word but kinda gave up because I don't kow.
i mean most sensible players that actually want the game to be good and provide feedback wouldnt be the leaker
The first guy that leaked it was so bad.
its always the people that are playing the game with their toes that end up leaking it
Fr these leakers gotta stop
I hate the word toes.
sounds so off i know
Nothing would really solve it. I just wish data miners would stop scraping the barrel for random stuff in files, and trying to cause outrage in the community for reactions.
AKA, the multiple posts they spawned regarding Specialists returning (they arent), there being SBMM (There isnt heavy SBMM) and there being no Server Browser (We have literally no news on this)
glad ea responded really quick on that "sbmm" thing
I wish data miners would find the mention of class restricted weaponry 🗣️
Did they officially?
I mean I know that
But of course that leaked too (As they probably expected it to)
Didn't even need to make a twitter post
? it got responded to by dice on reddit
Show me
Totals comment doesnt reference SBMM
And the main comment is a leaked message from a private discord, as I already said
God reading those comments just by instinct makes go to the mechwarrior subs and see idiots make silly looking mechs.
(It's much nicer over there)
But actually engaging with that it's crazy the narrative people took.
It did something though, Or that people are normally forgetful. Because I don't see anyone talking about the sbmm argument anymore.
Yeah, its the main thing that will stop people even being interested in the next game
Yeah, it mostly stopped sbmm discussions cause of that leaked post by Sirland
But on the other hand, those "fan made" trailers are quite cringe 
Lemme guess. AI.
No, just using the really meh gameplay from leaks and it makes it look quite...... Bad
LMAO
I pretty much know everything from the datamined stuff so there is no surprise left for me. I don't know how maps or game plays out though, you can't really get a feeling without playing the game itself.
I must say atmosphere is on point, third map reminds me of Alborz Mt. or Damavand Peak in terms of atmosphere. First map and second map's layout looks similar to BFV's Devastation or Marita, which I really like.
Xbox confirmed $80 games starting later this year 

Let's hope EA capitalizes on that with $70 price tag
and Series X price increasing to $600, Series S price increased to $429. OOF
Won’t lie I’ve not looked at a single text based leak, I don’t trust em
Even more reason why I mostly been playing indie games and snagging games from ggdeals lol
I seriously can’t wait to finish uni and be able to play games properly again
and then work decides to kick your ass 
Opposite case for me, the moment I finish uni I will be forced to work so I won't have any time to play anything 😭
Well, working is more enjoyable and more rewarding than modern FPS anyways
Ain’t that crazy lmao
Hey everyone, what if they added Dr. House into the next Battlefield game
I booted up Marvel Rivals, watched some guy completely miss me and get a hit marker, then go past me and even when I wasn't on the screen still got another hit marker. Games just lie to people to make them feel better about their inadequacy lol.
Played that game for about 2 weeks and realized there’s a ton of cheese and nonsense in it lol. Controller hitbox isn’t even close to accurate
It's wild how they can have someone like Punisher who needs insane mechanical skill to be even remotely impactful and lands on B tier
And then you get supports who tank, outheal DPS, do better DPS, and have escape mechanisms with no mechanical skill requirements
And they're S tier
That's why hero shooters are popular and why I dislike them, too much cheese
You don't need mechanical skills to compete as long as you have game knowledge with specific characters
I’m tired of hero shooters fr lol
OW is pretty insufferable at times but even that game feels way less cheesy than Rivals
I mean also the power fantasy of playing as a specific character
Still has the issue of placing way too much importance on a single role and if that player is deficient you pretty much autolose
And mixing ability usage within a shooter
Abilities aren't inherently a bad idea as long as it's utility based. Early Apex felt great because it was basically bubbles, grapples, ziplines, phases, and portals so just a lot of movement to help teams rotate.
But the problem is they just make abilities that now do everything while having no real finesse required, just immediate value for pushing a button.
DOPAMINE HIT DOPAMINE HIT DOPAMINE HIT DOPAMINE HIT
that’s all shit is anymore lmao
Also what the fuck is with every shooter adding wallhacks as an ability
95% of the player base of all shooters have casuals that legit have 0 situation awareness/game sense. Its a crutch that every game seems to add so that the shitters can have something to give them that dopamine they can only get with cheese lol
Once I see a game has that ability I’m immediately out
Sounds like you don't play many FPS these days 
I don’t lol. Only fps I play maybe once a week at this point is 2042 and I usually alt-f4 after I go 70-8 with 15 caps and my team loses by 400 cause they are all 3D spotting recons 500 m away from anything 😭😭
Felt
But don’t worry Squid G promises the game is fantastic because you can fly, c5 a tank and watch your epic explosion
Crazy people have made careers out of farming the bottiest of bots on the outskirts of the map
But also scream tryhard if they get shot
How dare they do something and try to have fun TBH. Probs better off to sit in discord and complain all day
Also the irony of the above statement on players with lower skill, when thast the reaon lots fo us like BF. No SBMM, random players in all lobbies
He can have fun how he wants but that’s his only argument for why he thinks the game is fantastic lol.
He is 100% a shill since he’s been given dedicated game modes named after him and is one of their top creator program dudes.
Not to mention those types will call legitimate criticisms to be ignored and just hate, toxic positivity kind of shit
Nintendo saves the industry yet again! 
Hopefully they read these comments,
Gameplay is drastically improved since the first playtest but still lots of work to be done,
- vehicles need a more realistic touch to firing their canons like some blow back action or the enviorment of dust and particles flying from the blast of an Abrams and more suspension and movement, not so stiff
-the down animations need to go i miss seeing soldiers fly from explosions or drop realistically from being shot
-remove grenade wind trails
-remove the point counter for hitmakers within the sight it breaks immersion and gets in the way and looks arcadish like apex legends
-gunplay is still too similar to 2042, too fast of reloading and aiming down sights - tweak the recoil and suppression to how 3/4 is
-remove the see through wall players it is annoying as hell to see my teammates outlined through walls, all they need is a name above their head that fades the further or closer they get
-make corner or object mounting less accurate than using a bipod
other than that sound design is beautiful, graphics look great and gameplay is alot more gritty and violent looking but still needs tweaking.
They don't read these comments
They do, but 90% of these things are subjective, cant actually know if they are needed, or just terrible ideas
the down animations need to go i miss seeing soldiers fly from explosions or drop realistically from being shot
Soldiers already ragdoll, then enter a downed state. This is irrelevant
remove grenade wind trails
Its good IMO, helps the thrower see where their nade went
remove the point counter for hitmakers within the sight it breaks immersion and gets in the way and looks arcadish like apex legends
As with 2042, this will 100% be toggleable
gunplay is still too similar to 2042, too fast of reloading and aiming down sights
Gunplay looks nothing like 2042. We also havent seen enough to know...and you cant judge gunplay by watching a video
make corner or object mounting less accurate than using a bipod
There is no way to know how accurate or inaccurate this is without playing the game. Doesnt look to be any more accurate than standing. Seems to be just a corner peek
tweak the recoil and suppression to how 3/4 is
What does this even mean? Blanket statements on recoil and suppression are the least useful thing ever
Average BSOD w
It’s funny to me how I’ve now heard 3 people dislike wind trails when I’ve heard nobody else say they dislike them since bf4 introduced them
What else do I have to do to take part in the playtest? I registered and haven't received an email or anything similar yet.
There is nothing more you can do.
99% of people who signed up also havent been chosen.
Okay thanks for the info but real talk I won't buy the new BF until I've done it myself, BF2042 was such a bad buy and I'm careful now. I just hope that the playtest will help me to get a great BF again.
2042 is ok now, better than launch. But yeah, it was a bad time at launch and the year or so after (At least as a solo player)
Yes, I believe you, but we all want the atmosphere and gameplay of the good BF3/4
well, two months before release I'll definitely get another chance to play the beta, as long as it's not behind a paywall again.
still feel this game is closer to 2042 than an actual bf game

A class system without class restricted weapons isn’t a class system at all
This is closer to a hero shooter than anything
You are using the same gun and changing your gadgets, so are you actually changing classes or just changing your character
Everytime someone unironically talks about something that's immersion breaking I just render their argument moot.
Like dude wtf are you talking about lol
Show me any hero shooter that works like this. Ill wait.
People be saying things just to say things. I swear
Literally any?
If anything, hero shooters are more restrictive in how weapons are set. Each hero has a set weapon and set of abilities. None of the above makes any sense
Its fine to say you want class restricted weapons, without having to throw in nonsense statements on how not having that makes a game feel
Apex, though that’s a BR so
Valorant, though that’s round based
It’s just hard for me to explain what I mean
But what’s the point of having classes if every single one uses the same weapons
Why not just have the gadgets free for everyone too then
Your conflating classes having a class gadget they always have, and weapons currently not being class locked/restricted...with the game being a hero shooter.
Because the weapon pool being free for everyone makes it feel that way
Its really doesnt
Do you feel BF2042 has classes?
Yes, as the gadgets are class locked, each class plays best when you play to their strengths
It was not on launch
Yeah I barely feel a difference between what we had and we have now
and it equally plays more like a hero shooter, as each specialist has a unique gadget
This aint classes I’m just changing what hero with which abilities I’m playing
I can understand the angle that theyh too kwith specialists but good god is it imbalanced.
This is like class lite
the only difference between a past game, and the next game...is non class locked weapons. which apparently makes it a hero shooter in your eyes
It does yes
which is ridiculous to say
The idea I understand with specialists is that for all intents and purposes they're... specialised subclasses.
Like how Archetypes were meant to work in bf5.
How your weapon and gadget choice was dictated under that sub class.
I guess any game can be defined as hero shooter under these criteria. CS is a hero shooter, Halo Reach is a hero shooter, Titanfall is a hero shooter
I too would prefer class restricted weapons, but its a hell of a reach to call something a hero shooter for lacking that
No because cs has no skills locked to characters
Titanfall I think so I don’t remember
And halo I barely played
BF4 is a hero shooter, with some weapons restricted to classes!
Youre just building a hero, not building a class.
I’ll just reword it a bit
I guess bf4 is more like
Overwatch
And 2042 and 6 are more like
Apex
Or valorant
Cuz every class has a weapon category
And in overwatch every hero has their own weapon
I know
But i can’t think of any other game like old bfs and their class restricted weapons
automatic weapons are all the same anyways
2042 would be more similar to overwatch since each character has a unique ability
it's like titanfall 😛
I remember titanball having abilities but I thought you could choose them and the characters were just cosmetics
I don't remember unfortunately, too long since I played it 😔
bf4 is a hero shooter obviously
comparisons are hard ok 😭
What do ye think of the whole...each class has a set "Class Gadget" thing.
On one had its more ability per class, but on the other it is less choice in how youre "expected" to fullfil your role on the battlefield
honestly at this point I feel like most people just call something a hero shooter if it's characters feel like they'd fit a 'hero' roster
I think it's fine
Assaults running with no defib or meds was like eh in BF3 and 4
Oh I like it. Knowing that an engineer will always have a repair kit is a joy, same for medics. One less random factor to consider
CSGO clone
yeah but that's besides the point
Gives you room to use other gadgets too, sure it implies a certain playstyle but you've got 2 free gadget slots to play your way
Yes, it has heros (Agents) so it is a hero shooter
ANYWAYS
I just feel that without class restricted weapons, you aren't changing a class since your weapon transfer over to the next one, but instead you are just changing your character that comes with new abilities
so are you changing class or are you just changing your character
You are changing class

I still think the gadgets are more important lol
it is but I just feel it's class LITE
I dont really get why this is confusing. If I want to resupply and heal/revive, I play support, If I want to kill and repair vehicles I swap to engineer.
facts
like universal weapon classes already muddy the waters already
atp I don
really care
I think universal SMG's are good enough because they're pretty range limited.
but they give the classes the utility they need to do their job.
But the kind of automatic weapons that you want to rely on should stay in a certain class. I'm not in support or against in the argument of 2042's class system because I think there are worse issues than every class having every gun.
I feel like people focus on labelling it than actually engaging with the problems.
Like there's an actual conversation.
You obviously need to do something to make non aggressive classes more viable in a game like this. If it were up to me, id give assault and recon ARs. Give engineers and support Carbines and LMGs, then give everyone DMRs, SMGs and Shotguns. While at the same time making Sniper Rifles recon exclusive
yeah snipers are the only category I'd restrict because they encourage more passive playstyles
At the same time, lots like to pay recon as an infiltrator type class
Thats why id give them ARs
yeah that'd be cool
AKA, recons who get up close and dangerous, moving behind enemy lines, placing spotting tech, spawn beacons, ETC.
I feel like IF there are not a lot of sniper rifles in the game (At launch) something like this would offer a good way to restrict weapons to classes, but still allow diverse playstyles.
I think BF5 did a decent enough job for keeping the class relatively monotone.
The more abnormal wepaons had hard limitations.
Fg42 and BAR despite having the same killing potential as some of the assault rifles had lower mags to compensate making sure support could go sicko mode.
Bren and lewis gun were amazing ranged weapons for the class style despite their gimped firerates you could out accuracy most assault rifles.
The last thing I want is a game like Delta Force, where they (seemingly) arbitrarily allow one class, hero or other use X weapon, but not Y weapon.
I understand the direction they went with that and I didn't hate it completely.
Same, but their execution of it is kinda terrible.
Like they allow some of the really OP ARs or Carbines for one class...but not other worse weapons in the same category. It just feels weird in practice
Battlefield has always been ''Big map CoD''. It looks slower than 2042 which is my main concern instead. ADS speeds are too slow and TTK is too fast.
This dude says ttk is too fast while it's quite literally the same as every other BF 
The damage for the galil is 33(.4) up close so I'm interested to see what they're gonna do
But than again
The ttk for bf5 in the alpha was way 1uicker.
33 up close at 680 rpm makes it a 267ms ttk
G3a4 with same dmg at 600rpm makes it 300ms
I would post screenshots, but no tengo perms
267 ttk is good yeah. I think they're going to incorporate body multipliers.
Which is why it has such high damage.
Up close anyways
Hopefully not too low for limbs, i want consistency instead of a gun being able to 4btk or 7btk by hitting random body parts
Well I didn't play, that's what people who played it told me though 😛
There are 217ms ARs too, weapon that looks similar to ACWR
Based in the damage areas, you do different damage to the legs, arms, torso, chest and head
Hk433
Going by raw numbers, its the same
Ttd on the other hand, might feel fast, but that's cuz netcode and stuff that's still being worked on
Also GTA VI confirmed for may 2026 release date
Reminds me a dice dev round the bf4 era walked into the office and saw a box of rubber bands with the caption "bad netcode"

Good
We will play BF6 before GTA6
PC 2027 awesome sauce
Doesn't mean BF6 is confirmed fall this year release tho
I think most people want a game slower than 2042
My guess is still March 2026 over Fall 2025
I'm fine with slower pacing too, I've been playing MWIII which is slower than 2042 imo, it's fine but I don't want the game to come to a crawling halt of headglitching and corner holding
I have a solution to headglitching but you're not going to like it...
I'll say this. 2042 is ultra fast paced and I agree that it needed to be toned down a bit.
But the issue i have is how far people want it.
And interpretations around it
even MWIII would probably be considered too fast
I think most people would be happy with BF1 pacing
the vitriol for sliding and bouncing around is brazy
I want BF4 pacing 
maybe without the bat shit crazy jumping....
I can confirm
Yup, I've known for a bit
(TooMuchCyanide was quite happy when he found out lol)
Ohhh yeah he pointed it out.
Like of course
Of course cy would look up the specific model of the g36 hahaha
I'm very happy for him.
It's a higher percentage that the release for BF6 will be March/April 2026. Reason being the game is prealpha right now in BF Labs from what we've seen from the Leaks. Maybe Beta test in Oct/Nov this year
Yeah, that's what I'm guessing as well
A larger open beta during fall to stress test servers on a super large scale
Sure just release another shitty title with glue and tape
True, but I think they'll want to make this game as polished as possible to prevent mistakes of the past
I want a functional game 
I can wait till march/april
It sucks, but working game better than not
Hell I'll wait till 2027 if it means the best Battlefield ever
I want them to work on the game as long as possible (and I never implied a n early release and a buggy game like dude alright lol)
I got 20 other games to fill the void and hit S999 in Battlefield 2042
We've seen 2 to 3 months worth of development and I like to think they can do a crazy amount within another 6 8 months.
Fuck getting max rank in that game.
Yeah, im s303
Ain't nobody got the sanity to reach max level there lol
Lots of people of have lol
Are they currently sane tho 
GTA 6 delayed a year
Likely allows Next BF game a safe Q4 2025 release window (If needed)
I'm still guessing March 2026
Yeah, maybe. I just mean if they had planned to release in 2025...there isnt really anything stopping them now
True
But I truly hope that they are still considering moving it back if they did plan 2025 to make it as polished as possible
Gta comes out next year looks like youll be able to release earlier
BF6 IN NOVEMBER 2025 Lez goooooooo
It's not confirmed whatsoever
It may still be early 2026 for all we know
Release when its ready. 👌
Me at S805...
But u not s999 tho 
Definitely not sane anymore
Understandable
Have a great day 
yay
Fun fact I’ve never played a single second of any GTA game ever lol
I played all of them but I only really liked San Andreas and Vice City, didn't finished any of them though
I like Vice City most due to aesthetics, it's pretty much a Scarface game
GTA 4 is peak
now that gta is delayed yeah
yes
did anyone hear gta6 will be deyla to 2026
nope
is only Console Players choosen for labs?
No
ok thx. wondering that the leaks are only Console players made,
there's reasons that it's controller players leaking 

but it looks like the game will more optimization for Controller....
how so?
and what does it mean "more optimization for controller"?
did you mean more optimized for console?
cuz if they didn't optimize PC (which is A LOT of BF players compared to console) they would get hella flak
yeah i mean for console. when i start 2042 90% are Console Players. Console players have less recoil, its the wrong way. You can play on console dont get me wrong but than pls the same for all Players, and when you are bad, like the player who leaked the gameplay pls, than he must get punished by other players and dont reward these kind of players with technical stuff.
when i remember than was BF4 CTE only for PC players isn't it?
well obviously console is gonna have less recoil, it just makes sense 🤷♂️
and bf4 cte i don't know if it was pc only or not
but they have to test crossplay during labs, because not doing so would be dumb
You really should go back and play GTA IV. It's one of my top 5 all time games, and I've been playing since the Atari 5200 was new.
Facts
less recoil with a fast TTD like in 2042 is for me not ok, the weapons are Lasers on Range and closed fight, put the TTD little bit higher to solved the one frames than im Happy. Most of my deaths i cant react.
Unpopular opinion but current 2042 has the best gunplay in the series 🥶 Or has the potential to be the best
They need to give it higher recoil and more damage dropoff brackets and voila, you have the best BF gunplay
yeah good point but than also for Console Players. and Damage drop on range would be also nice.
well that's cause 2042's netcode and servers kinda 💩 themselves 99% of the time
I'm fine with less recoil on controllers tbh, current recoil looks good according to leaks
People still can't control it
BF6 most likely won't have overpowered aim assist unlike other modern shooters anyways imo, 2042 had good aim assist compared to modern shooters
yeah in the new one it looks good youre right!
I’m concerned that the delay of GTA VI will cause the new battlefield to be rushed and crunched to release this fall
if EA is smart, they will allow them time to polish the game to as good as it can be
if it means early 2026, fine by me
I hope they rush it, I want to play new Battlefield 😭
smacks hand
no, bad, i want polished game
Well true but I still want them to release it this year, there is no better release date
jan-mar 2026 is a good timeframe as well
Modern FPS space is quite literally slop, DICE has an easy win in their hands
Look at the competition, Marathon and BO6.5
still doesn't mean they should rush to compete in the fall 🤷♂️
i'd rather wait until early next year to have good game rather than a launch that's a cluster
Well true, let's hope core systems and maps are good at launch even if it's delayed, I hope they will leave few funny bugs in the release, funny bugs are part of Battlefield experience like the spider hovercrafts or long neck 
Bf4 was very faint at least to where you can barley see it but also see an icon on the grenade itself
bf4's grenade wind trail was very much visible 
I have yet to see dramatic Ragdoll effects, Downed state breaks immersion and looks goofy
Grenade wind trails are more cartoonish looking in bf6, if they kept it closer to 3 and 4 with just an icon you get to learn actual skill on how high or low you should throw kinda of like the m320 on hardcore no indication yet I can range perfectly and get kills from far away same with grenades you just have to LEARN instead of it giving you an easier advantage, makes it more immersive
If you can toggle on and off the point counter that’s good I didn’t know that but overall they should still get rid of it
Gunplay doesnt look exactly like 2042 compared to the first playtest but the reload times, aim down sight speed and recoil is more comparable to that than 3/4 tho i see they are trying to get it close to 3/4 but i still see some 2042 in it
The corner and object mounting is a suggestion so it balances out better not canceling out the bipod making it useless
If you played the last games then played 2042, you’d know bf3 and bf4 recoil is something to LEARN as well as grenade throwing range, so you can control the guns spread and sways, I still get a sense of laser beam gameplay it’s not the least useful thing ever because some of the most little details makes the most drastic changes. It’s not that hard to think bout
If you understood what immersion is maybe you’d understand what those people are saying lmao
Not as visible as this one bud, again a lot more faint, there is no arguing against that lmao
it should take skill to control a weapon not laser beams that’s what makes battlefield intense is trying to land those shots from a distance with recoil but if you can control it right it’s a lot more appealing and rewarding right now it’s laser beamish
Sticks aren't exactly the best with recoil.
- mentioned above your post: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wmyPoNGzUfs
- damage numbers should be toggle-able, not fully removed
- gunplay is (from leaked footage) entirely it's own version of BF gunplay; the reload times are whatever, ads times have been relatively consistent in the BF games
- i haven't seen footage
- BF has never had crazy recoil

It's possible but considering the limited nature it's kinda annoying.
And yeah the recoil has never been a lot.
only BF that has had crazy recoil is BFV, but that's cuz of the extremely poor decision of making spread = recoil
and it's not even high vertical recoil
and this is from someone on MnK, where recoil is 30% more than controller/console
I wouldn't even say it was high there but it was more inconsistent.
It was really funny too going from console to pc and just beaming people with the ke7 like it was nothing.
yeah, hence the "crazy" because it was a crazy bad idea to add lolol
I think BFV pretty much has more recoil than any other recent BF tbh
Recoil was a lot more noticeable and effective in 3/4 compared to 2042 I’m not saying the gun needs to spaz but there needs to be a learning curve to create some actual skill, in 3-4 the 240 bravo spread would be crazy because of recoil, but like in real life if you tap fire it’s more accurate. They need to bring this sense of recoil back
lol, i got called a cheater for hitting a 4sec hang time zook 
I was playing with cy today and somehow we didn't get called cheaters today
There was this one randy that was mad though.
Bf3 and bf4 didn't have much recoil either.
Scar h recoil was violent in 3/4 2042 it’s laser beams and new footage is somewhat laser beams, doesn’t matter if it’s leaked it’s their movement system for now and we’re here to tell them what to do with it
Pushing your mouse up to control recoil isnt difficult
down
Plus it's a SCAR L.
for the non invert players lol
Get out of here non invert casual
This is plenty of recoil lmao
bro posted a link of launch/beta 2042 and a clip of a bf3 trailer....
Still adds more skill and is more immersive and enjoyable than laser beams
Again it's a SCAR L or course it's easy to control it.
Here lemme find full made game play footage for you then
brb, gonna grab some recoil footage
Your incentivised to burst anyways due to spread.
this
Managing spread and recoil has always been a battlefield thing.
recoil has never been excessive though 
Yeah it's always been kept down by the need to pace.
And when you do go full auto you're either heavily punished or you're a support gunner.
All of this is purely academic anyway, as you can't judge recoil from videos.
Well when you go full auto its point blank and someone jumpscares the shit out of you.
Players are becoming more naturally inclined to control recoil.
Thanks to cod.
Vivid reminder about that ak105 kit that removed all vertical recoil and would actually fuck over half the player base who are used to actually controlling recoil.
if they kept it closer to 3 and 4
So you want the grenades to be big flashing orange illuminous balls, and call this more "immersive"? Ok...I guess
The corner and object mounting is a suggestion so it balances out better not canceling out the bipod making it useless
What?
you’d know bf3 and bf4 recoil is something to LEARN as well as grenade throwing range, so you can control the guns spread and sways,
BF4 has very little to learn when it comes to gunplay. You just tap fire to win, or full auto in CQC.
@faint pivot
https://discordapp.com/channels/140933721929940992/258372071086620674/1367906995843367013
recoil visuals and patterns for BF3, BF4, BFV, Hardline, and 2042 (not including BF1 because i can't be arsed to install that game)
all MnK no control, all 1x sights (1.25x for 2042, cuz no 1.00x), attachments that are commonly used on those guns
bfv didn't let me choose specilizations, so didn't have the vertical recoil reducing one to enable
and all were m416 minus bfv, which i used the sturmgewehr instead
It’s a lot more immersive then a cartoonish looking windtrail and plus in hardcore you can’t see them, again grenade launching and throwing took some skill to learn in bf3 and bf4 I understand 4 had trails but very faint at least
Corner and object mounting can make the bipod become useless and really have no meaning if they don’t tweak it correctly, mounting a weapon to a wall or sandbag shouldn’t give you as much recoil control as a bipod it’ll balance itself out while still keeping the mounting feature in the game
Bf4 still had more visual recoil than bf2042
Bf3 was probably the best for me in terms of gunplay and recoil
BF4 DID NOT HAVE MORE VISUAL RECOIL THAN 2042 
Lol
also hardcore mentioned, so i automatically decided to leave this convo at this point in time
Save your sanity. We have another realism and immersion lover. Which only applies as an argument against things they don't like.
Glowing orange ball for grenades? 👍
Small wind trail behind grenade? 👎
Yes but for some reason In 3-4 it felt a lot more natural and effective in 2042 it’s as if the visual recoil is just there for your eyes and not for actual gameplay or spread
Probably because they removed it in 4
You’re goofy, it’s the small details that make huge differences
BF4 quite LITERALLY does not have visual recoil
please refer to the clips i posted in the screenshots channel
yeah, anytime someone who likes/mains hardcore in BF, i auto ignore anything they say for the core modes 🤷♂️
Bf4 literally has visual recoil
I know there was an update to the recoil systems in bf4 at one point.
Well you sure are replying to everything you ignore lmao you guys are funny
It was a conscious effort by dice to improve gunplay.
It’s ok everything first stated when I joined this labs yall were trying to downplay too but they actually ended up changing the things myself and plenty other vets were talking bout lmao
Your opinion doesn’t dictate the direction this is going the community as a whole does lmao
Visual recoil was removed from BF4 😂

It was still in bf4 😂
Was.
Then why are you saying it has it?
Yeah he said it wasn’t in it
sigh i'm replying to the stuff you stated about the older games, not what's happening with the new game
like the bf4 stuff
He said bf4 didn’t have visual recoil while it did
Hi Loe, how are you
You said it has, meaning you didn't know it was removed.
It’s ok dice and ea are who I’m hoping these comments reach not yall 🙏🏻
Probably because they removed it in 4
Visual recoil was removed from BF4
vibing, doin ok hbu?
They’re already listening to their community so I’m sure they’ll take note of what I said
And many others who are saying similar things
Oh I'm sure yeah
stuff 
also, that shorts clip you posted saying BF4 has visual recoil, that was a 2042 clip 
Yeee first playtest was garbage in my opinion everything we complained about got fixed and it drastically improved in second so im not too worried i think they’ll listen
No. These things they're doing right now are a conscious effort on dice to make a decent gameplay experience.
Listen to the audio all the way through
People play games to play not fight.
"First playtest was garbage" yes. That's the nature of a playtest.
yeah, idk wtf westie smoking
i literally recorded footage of the recoil 20min ago of bf3-2042 not including bf1 lol
Ironically recoils are more felt in semis due to the nature of them.
Random question about Labs
If I were to be in a playtest, in which I play on Xbox, and clipped something with my remote, would the clip save to my Xbox?
well;
- you shouldn't be saving clips to your xbox since that's against NDA i believe
- i don't know, i'm on PC
Essentially what I'm asking is that would it be possible for me to record captures on my Xbox without violating the agreement
Okay that makes sense just curious
that's something you would need to talk to an EA/DICE dev about
but i highly doubt it's allowed to clip/record stuff
Obviously I don't want to violate the terms of service because I'd like to actually provide feedback and wouldn't want to throw that all away by posting it or something 😭
Okay that makes sense then thank you
Read the playtest agreement on the ea playtest site. It's at the bottom of the page.

Will do 🤞
I reckon it shouldn't be a problem as long as you save it for your personal use as no one but you has seen it.
But of course I'm not EA I'm just trying to think reasonably.
Corporate shit often covers many many edges.
I don't think it specifically says you can't record, just that you aren't allowed to share anything. Unsure if recordings on Xbox are auto-uploaded to a cloud or something, which may violate said agreement
HC detected, opinion rejected
Yes my whole comment was basically aimed towards them listening to us after heavily criticizing the movement and gunplay while some people here thought it didn’t need any changing and that “it’s a new battlefield w its own style let it be “ lmao no as long as we push heavy criticism and hold them accountable they will listen to the majority
That’s what this whole playtest is for is for giving them feedback on things they can change 💀
Westie wasn’t smoking anything he’s been close to battlefield devs for awhile and I’m sure always gets nees before anyone else I think he knows what he’s talking about lmao
Yall just must not be good at hardcore and it shows 😂
It’s hilarious you and some bf Reddit boomers think you’re the majority
Didn’t we already have this discussion about you posting your stats and you hit us with the “Russians hacked my account”
They did my boi and I’m not lying about that lmao idk what else to tell you, too bad they’re listening to those boomers and literally switched everything I and plenty others across the internet first critiqued go cryyyyyy somewhere
If I had my old account I would post it there is no shame or lies to be told bro I don’t play games like I used to but when I did play games I was on it from the moment I woke up to the moment I went to sleep sweaty and grinding on gta4 online red dead 1 online and bf3 and yes i was a beast on bf3, I really wish I could get my stats to show but I can’t so oh well idc what yall gotta say bout that ik what I was capable of on bf3, getting kicked from servers just because I’d be racking up admin kills 😂
We can always hop on a bf3 or bf4 game together squad up and see who comes out on top, from kd to point racking, I was beast on console and I’ve only gotten better on pc
“They’ve switched everything” so you’re blind and dumb?
Also, this is DICE bud, they’ve fucked with TTKs in the games multiple times within a year, they can revert a lot of shit. Wild how this is a playtest and they can just turn knobs at their leisure
Also because everytime I see you post I see some subspecies’ opinions and articulation, I’m just going to block you
Westie who abandoned the franshise to play warzone? 🤣
Yeah because battlefield went in a shit direction😂
Bf1 was fire and bfv was decent
Majority of bf YouTubers stated theyre switching up their content because of those reasons and because it brings more traffic to their pages
Westie is a walking contradiction. He forms his opinion based on what's popular at the time he makes it.
Westie is one YouTube there is lvlcap threatty all these YouTubers got big off battlefield
Cried for a live service BF game for years and for premium to stop, then straight away cried asking for premium back once the community hated live service.
Westie didn't get big off Battlefield lol
Yeah that’s how things worked they didn’t have test environments back then
Clueless, I'm out
Yes we did goofball
He blew up off battlefield
Go look at his oldest videos you’re the clueless one
“ClUeLeSs” 🫵🏻🤓
"we"
Grown man crashing out over you dissing Westie
🤣
You don’t know the definition of Crashing out bubba go back to paying attention in class
Homie takes a typo and runs w it 🤡
Westie*
For your own sanity lol
😭
Again go look at his oldest videos he in fact did get big off of battlefield and was a big part and voice of the community along with a couple others wayyyyy before he became mainstream popular opinion type of guy
And as soon as the Battlefield money well dried up, he jumped ship. Can't blame him, he wanted his channel to survive. He doesn't even cover news on BF anymore tho.
His takes on the franchise and what it needed/needs are historically terrible tho. You won't change my opinion on that.
