#battlefield-labs-discussion
1 messages · Page 56 of 1
attrition for tanks though. good idea, imo.
BFV movement was the best imo, gunplay...meh
Yeah it balances sorta
^
The movement and slide helped create a skill gap, much needed one too
Honestly a decent system imo would be to have a certain amount of med/ammo boxes off spawn for support and medic. Like 4-5 maybe, with a cooldown between placing them down
Once you run out then maybe they can only be resupplied from a supply point like BF5
Reddit neckbeards complaining that there's slide in the new battlefield are so trash that they chat hit a moving target
Swear reddit is nuts
Dumbest takes
They hate me on Reddit lol
They think battlefield is milsim
I agree with Zeethos, BFV has the shortest engagement distances in the series because random recoil assures you can't beam people from 100 meters
Do yourselves a favor lads
Never listen to the BF reddit unless you want to have a bad day
The BF Reddit is arguably the worst I’ve seen it these past few days
Yup
Controlling spread is easy af in comparison
Most are trash cans that complain about women in a modern era battlefield
LIKE ITS A MODERN ERA GAME
WHY DOES IT MATTER
spread also does that 
but bursting helps it be more accurate, as it should
Fragile masculinity incels fr
I feel like spotting should be way less powerful and remove the need for you to be told you are spotted tbh. Like a player spot not marking you on map, not showing a live update, or such. Make map spots last known positions
It makes sense for a modern game bcs women serve in modern militaries where they largely didnt in WW2 for BF5. Simple as.
Spread can be mastered easily
"I've played BF4 for 2k hrs and never seen anyone do a zouzou"
Yeah probably because you were prone sniping a mile away trying to make a clip for YT ya F king nerd lol
Random recoil can't be mastered by design
No women actually fought on Frontline in ww2. Now modern yes but still not much
But they can
And they do
Just not much
Also other countries they do as well
I think spotting really carries BF game visibility. Really important. The better these games look the harder it is to see things
this, giant gap in the average player that can learn bursting in BF4 as opposed to the players that tame BFV random recoil
If you care about women being in a modern era military game then you have problems
Well you cant control BFV gunplay lol, it’s designed not to be. Feels horrible tbh
but here's the kicker
IT'S A VIDEO GAMEEEEEEEEE
WHO CARES that much to include women as some characters (MP related only)
this, random recoil + decoupled reticle makes it feel gross
True
If they add that to BF6 people will ask 3D spotting to be removed once they notice 90% of their deaths comes from that 😂
Didn’t expect to find Enders here
railing someone from a distance in BFV consistently with the m1 or turner felt good
Detaching the point of aim from screen center remains one of the worst changes ever lol
he drops in fairly reg
Fr. The only times it matters is when you’re replicating an irl story in like a campaign
Women have fought in combat and wars for thousands of years, but leave it to the neck beards to get upset about a women in a video game holding a gun. MUH Immersion reeeeeeee
I usually don’t run into or be in the same space as content creators
Because of the way the gunplay was in BFV it only made SLR’s that much better. The G43 was insane too
the decoupled reticle was the issue imo
agreed, that shit is annoying, bf1/hardline can bypass it because bullets spawned from center screen, so crosshair x = Ws
I want bf6 to have the same level of customization that bfv has 😀
Now understand how good the G43 was and know that the BSVM in 2042 was even better lmao
Spotting should honestly take longer in newer games.
I think that and pinging should probably be mapped to one button/key. Tapping it will spot an enemy, but you have to keep your cursor on the enemy for like half a secnond for the spot to go through, and there should be like a 1 second cooldown between new spots. And holding it should just allow you to ping stuff
Thats how busted it was
pre nerf BSVM hehehehe
all for recoil and spread. no for laser beams. just imo.
Pre nerf BSVM is one of the most OP BF weapons ever
2042 andV (to a degree) are terrible when it comes to 3D visuals of spotted soldiers and markers/icons.
Way too much info, like health bars, player name, class icon. Players become reliant on those things to see anything. Which is a failure on the rendering and design side.
1 kill away from Tier 40ing it and have just kept it at that for like 1.5 years now
as soon as they nerfed it I was like, nah I'm done
lmao
I think going back to the way BF4 did things would be acceptable. Looking at someone in 2042 and having all that info come up is really strong but also provides excellent visibility
MAS44 🐐
BFV levels of 3d spotting but use the 2042 glowstick on uniforms I feel would be a good spot for visibility
bu-bu-bu-bu-but MuH ImMeRsIoN
Also the lighting on 2042 is really annoying. its hard to see things after you exit a building
2042 doesn't even need 3D spotting imo, it's one of the most visually clear games in the series, lights they added to player models makes a huge difference
inside me are two wolves:
one with dorito chips perma stuck on my head
the other with glowsticks on my body
Yeah, let me have my Yee Haw back
2042 has those icons appear at much to far a range, so a nerf to that alone would also help. Also bugs related to those things being visible through geometry/walls, etc are bad for the games. But I would guess solving them (for 2042) woild incur a big CPU time cost.
For me the glowsticks never seemed to stick out that much against most backgrounds
^
I used to think that until I played BF3/BC2 mode
Some character models were literally invisible in Stadium
They were just enough to have your eye catch something but never too bad like BF 3/4 spotting
for me
your eyes may vary
With factions returning, hopefully they are working on having some nice clean and recognizable class sillouettes. Glownsticks were mostly needed in 2042 due to the specialist clone wars. I did like them for at a glance player identification tbh tho.
BF1 spotting wasn't too bad I guess
Spotting is low on my list of concerns tbh. It's still a good topic for discussion tho
We need glowsticks again imo
Just, please no more wall hack stuff
imo spotting is pretty big, dictates how the game plays out/visibility
Say no to 3D spotting 
The glow sticks are nice for having minimal HUD modes or gameplay capture.
how many times in BF 3/4 I'd just shoot at a dorito despite never actually seeing what I'm shooting at
I mean if the dorito tag disappeared after 2 secs, it wouldnt be that bad would it
keep the dorito if you tag someone with a spot and maintain sight on them
but the perma 3d spotting of 3/4 that would follow you behind cover/walls needs to die
and like enders brought up, keep the BF V notification that lets you know if you're spotted
That's another way to balance it. But would you make the 3D element gone after 2 seconds, but said player remain map spotted for longer?
What's that thing in 2042, you shoot Rao or Paik and then you get spotted for the entire team or something. Never again, cancer
Getting killed by a Paik after they spot you with their hack is one of the least enjoyable things that can happen to a player in 2042.
Yeah it spots them for your squad only for 2 secs unless you maintain visual. Would work nicely
Its a necessary evil though because the base visibility without spotting is poor. You can try to help that with player lighting, little glowsticks, but I think Q spot is really needed
It's also incredibly low skill
y'all see Paiks these days? Feel like I see 1 per match at most
Killing them in-between scans is one of the funniest
Sure, 90% of the players don't even know the existence of minimap
I have 0 respect for anyone that uses Paik or Rao, or Casper
like I said, if I can visually see you and spot you and maintain that visual, keep the dorito. If I (the spotter) lose visual of you, the dorito needs to disappear
don't forget to include Liz
Ugh, TV rockets should be left to vehicles
unlike 3/4 where you just spam spot and have your screen lit up
Having that many available players use the TV rocket showed how unplayable and unbalanced it can get
Most importantly we need BF2 "Enemy spotted!" spam back
TGM is really fun, but the 2nd worst gadget for balance in 2042. (Behind C5)
What's wrong with C5?
Lis is an absolute abomination
nods
C5 paired with the shitty maps and constant availability of vehicles like the pondhawk make it the defacto way to stop troublesome ground vehicles.
Not a fan of SgtDngrCow? Lol
Oh, Sundance + C5 is annoying as shit
I miss the days of Sundance and M5 Recoilless WingZooks
But pilots cried
"We can't see you coming"
Camping tanks and Wildcats are more annoying-er
Consider why they could be camping...
Not that Sundance would be the sole reason, but surely doesn't help it
I tried pushing with tanks but Sundance would just squirrel up on me, drop C5's and kaboom
Because they are skill-less turds in a over protected vehicle harassing and farming kills from the sideline?
They added all these other launchers to the game, but when the best, most efficient way to destroy a ground vehicle is to redeploy and use C5, they are mostly irrelevant. I don't think I've ever been killed by the javelin or SRAW
I told you
I tried pushing, but with the vertical mobility and abundance of Mackay's, it's hard
tanks in 2042 were kinda forced to camp because of how much AT spam there was + Lis, it was very hard to actually stay up imo
But sure, some people are purely just skill-less
Vehicles aren't over protected in 2042 lol
The maps all suck for any kinds of smart movement, as soon as you try to help in a sector/objective at close/medium range, you get killed by c5.
Every vehicle in 2042 has AA counter measures, they also have APS, the RAM being the biggest POS of then all
yeah the RAM is insane lol
And APS does nothing against C5. RAM is just too fast, both max speed and acceleration
It's armor is mostly fine, and it does suffer a bit from 2042 launch design syndrome. Aka, rockets and explosive launchers on all seats.
Pretty sure once deployed (APS), the C5 can no longer detonate and is destroyed when thrown
It can
Unless they changed it
S5 maybe
Same
Too many changes
There was a point Irishs APS stopped everything including smoke grenades but not rockets
The best feeling armor to play aggressively is the Brawler. Cos it's armor and survivability on objectives isn't terrible.
You'd think after 2800hrs I'd remember this stuff
Irish APS no longer stops rockets now, iirc
The new ifv with the armor upgrades are pretty beefy too
lol, irish APS camping tanks, God 2042 was so broken
The gunner seat on the new IFVs feel better than any other gunner seat.
nothing compares to pre-nerf superhind + double repair tool bug
possibly the most OP vehicle of all time
Well...angel crate, launcher and infinite ammo/armor comes close lmao
lmao s1 superhind on exposure BT
Still baffles me that it was so busted they renamed Them from "transports" to "gunships" lmaooo
not even close imo
At one point during S1 my K/D for 2 days combined was 1002/2
in the superhind
biblical farm
I wouldn't know... lol
yeah they just caved lol
"lets rename it"
Mmm remember 30mm Bolte on release lol
It was nice being able to snipe them out, until they changed that too
Please no gunships ever again
i dont get why they made the bolte's windshield bulletproof lol
wasn't the hoverecraft windows also able to be shot thru?
I genuinely believe they're the most broken vehicle in recent memory.
then they removed that as well?
they didn't change it back to bulletproof windows? i thought they did, then again, i very rarely see hovercrafts anyway
Did it? They didn't have at release.
It does reduced damage
They were shortly, but you can shoot through them now, at least since S5
Similar to how the civilian pickup trucks also have reduced damage when shooting thru its windows for some reason
Still mad you couldn't snipe pilots out in BFV unless it was the German planes...
i hope they don't allow transports to have hella weapon choices like they do in 2042 
a jeep shouldn't have a flak, GL, minigun, and whatever other stuff there is that i don't remember
Flak, GL, mini gun, heavy machine gun, both with or without thermals, and the 30mm or 50mm lol
yeah, like it's a fucking TRANSPORT, not a fucking IFV
You can shoot at them but only in close distance
Like 20 meters
that datamined game mode sounds interesting
gunship was okay jsut needs a tweek
The 50mm was disgusting
Tempoyral leaks point towards only three bolt action rifles which i think confirms class loadouts wont be a thing
Very sad 😔
G43 is really good especially when you use the detachable magazine 
yolo twiz
Thank god, please go back to weapon locked classes
His first message was correct before they deleted it 
There’s only three bolt action rifles
If there were class restricted weapons, the number would be higher to match the other classes
Unless they also locked the DMRs to the recon class
nah, no locked weapons. make the weapon perk for each class more aggressive
to push a class towards a weapon class but not restrict
Do you realize that weapon locked classes is apart of the core of battlefield?
I'd say large maps, sandbox gameplay and combined arms are the core of battlefield
not arbitrary locked weapon classes that change from game to game
or I'd say that 1942 is core battlefield and each class should only have 1 gun. no unlocks, you're stuck with one gun
I hope they change it before launch and here's hoping thats a pre-alpha thing
Bruh
I'd be up for locked weapons if we had shit like all kit smgs or something.
No idea what they actually have planned though
class gadgets...
BF4 had class locked weapons yet most of the players can still be aggressive
Without the weapon restrictions the game is literally Modern Warfare
If you’re playing support then you should only use LMGS/MMGs
Yeah, mw19 had respawn beacons, rpgs, all that shit that’d be the class gadgets
If they did it would be equal for weapon counts per class so thats probably the case
Just make Carbines and Shotguns universal weapons like in BF4 and everything be class locked
so CoD had a gamemode that was inspired by BF
Without class restrictions, there’s nothing separating BF from CoD
so is BF CoD or is CoD BF?
Mhm, Ground War, it was cool af ngl
agreed, it also makes gameplay more predictable and strategic. If you're going up against an assault in bf4 you know what weapons they'll be carrying and can plan for it
Exactly bf need to have its own identity, not copy shitty ass COD games.
Class restrictions also helps you identify what Class are you fighting against especially games like BF4
And the problem is the devs just don’t fucking care!
Because any class being able to access any guns means more microtransactions
Why?
what
reddit moment
no they have heaps of data showing that players pick a class based off of the weapon
BFV had class locked weapons but they still sell mtx
Why would they buy an AR skin?
leading to massive imbalances across the franchise
Wrong
Not really just look at BFV, the game had class locked weapons but every guns per class has their own strong weapons
Idk if I explained myself properly
ARs will always be the most popular by a mile. It leads to big problems like lack of support players (whatever class is stuck with LMGs usually)
I can play as a Support in BFV and get 50-15/20
and if some gun is widely stronger than everything else, people will pick the class to use that gun, disregarding everything else
this is true, shit guns discourage people from playing a class
See BF5 medics who dont medic
Weapon locked classes will always and forever be the core part of battlefield.
True but every class having access to the same guns leads to monotony
Of course but if you put a strong weapon on every gun categories they would like to stick to that class more like what BFV did again
i think as long as classes have defined roles and locked gadgets we'll have a good middle ground, even if i prefer locked guns
there's already monotony when the majority of the server is playing X class to use Y gun regardless
Plus based on the leaks Support players gets a AR style of weapon
Battlefield 4 literally
if you want class identity, ask DICE to lean more into each class gadget doing it's job to a greater degree
this i can also agree with, there's a lot of overlap with some roles
or there has been, i should say
Yeah honestly BF4 mostly balanced class specific weapon catagories well, but supports were hard to find bcs LMGs kinda sucked outside of a few examples alongside having overall mostly mid gadgets
Yes I want to be only using SMG/PDW’s as an engineer
cool, YOU can do that
If the leaks are true Engies get SMGs back 
Pretty much the opposite of what BFV is doing, every gun per categories have their own strong guns so if they can do that while having a class locked weapons, why they can't do in the next game too?
But I don’t want to be able to use snipers as an engineer.
the problem is that this just makes the roles disappear
idk I hate this weapon system and this class system
specially assault being
that, assault
BFV had a problem (idk what it's currently like, haven't played for a few years) where the majority of lobbies were medics because of the type 2k being widely more powerful than anything else and they weren't doing their medic roles.
their role is "kill"
not really, guns don't play nearly as big of a part in roles as the gadgets do
an engineer using an AR/SMG/LMG doesn't change it being the vehicle buster class
I feel they play as much of a role
all they do is essentially decide what distance a class can engage other classes
3 too many
Yeah which is why I still think BFV nail the class balance since class has their own strong weapon like the SG 1-5 for the Assault, ZK 383 for the Medic, FG-42 for the Support and the ZH-89 for the Recon which allows the players to play aggressively
I agree that BF5 had good class to class weapon balance but their gadget balance was fucked
You can have 2042's weapon system but make the class perks for the specific weapon class to a degree to where you probably don't want to use a gun outside of that
but people are still given the freedom to pick whatever gun on any class
something I do find kind of weird if they are going with the free weapon system however
Type 2A is useless outside of Metro and most of the maps, every weapons are viable hell I can fight to head with a ZK user in the Medic using the FG-42 as a support
there's carbines and there's assault rifles
carbines would be silly if every class has an assault rifle
I guess they are separating the categories to not clutter the category of ARs
but it is weird
I mean BF4 had that and it was fine honestly
it was fine because assault rifles were restricted to assault
It didn't change massively
if bf6 has unrestricted guns then nobody will use carbines ever
I don't play that close of attention to the gun names, the type 2A probably isn't the gun I'm thinking of for medic.
I know weapons are viable outside of them, I played practically exclusively assault because I like semi auto rifles the best when developers don't actively make them dogshit in games
Pretty much
thing is
idk what the fuck they mean by carbines
because the HK417 is a carbine according to them
doesn't change the fact there was a massive medic population due to one of their guns being stupid broken for a period of time leading to a ton of medics but no medic gameplay.
2042's perks are meh, it's only good for assault players
Assault has almost all the explosives, both anti infantry AND AT which feels dumb, because AT is much higher priotity. medics obviously have heals and revives but smokes ultimately get annoying in their volume later into matches. Supports obviously have ammo, but their gadgets boil down to a mini nade pistol which makes little sense for supports defensive nature, outside of the normal mines. Recons do make sense with their spotting gadgets and spawn beacons though.
I still think that this leads, wether the players want to or not, to help others
Even with the ZK 383 which is what most players are using as a medic, they can still fight heads on with the Assault and Support cuz their guns are really strong too
I agree, DICE can do better with the perks
the thing I don't like about this BF6 system is that the assault is a loner class
they can't do shit to help others
Kinda but the biggest reason is because of the Attrition system
Attrition system made the medic more viable than using the Assault
the attrition system isn't stopping medics from reviving
I can't wait for the whole team to be filled with assault players and 0 healing and 0 ammo boxes
Thats the worst thing about the class system since BF4. Assault has been turned into a lone wolf class in a team based game.
Yeah but they carry unlimited health pouches
Which they can play more aggressively
Compared to Assault and Support
also they are advertising this shit as "The classes are back!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!"
which will happen if AR's get locked to Assault
yet it's literally BF2042
Since you can't fully regenerate your health
Fragging is helping others
infantry maps will just be assualts
Honestly medics should have a certain amount of med boxes with cooldowns, they need to resupply their boxes at some point.
Easy that stops infite heals without attrition
nah draining the other team's tickets isn't helping the team
Again that's not the case since they're bringing back mechanics like being able to grab Health and Ammo from the Medic/Assault or Support players from BFV and Hardline which is already in the leaks
I think something that could benefit the assault class if they are going to go with this shitty class system is giving them smoke grenade launchers
at least that'd help the whole team push
True, helping the team is half reviving teammates only for them to die 2 seconds later again 🤣
They're bringing back grabbing Health and Ammo mechanics from BFV and Hardline which the leaks already confirmed so you can just go near them and grab them by yourself
which doesn't change anything if the majority of players are just playing assault because ARs are their favorite guns
I have no idea why 2042 has so many bad medics, 90% of the time they don't revive, when they revive they just half revive which leads to unnecessary deaths
That's pretty good
also, people complained about Hardline not being a BF game
imo, that shit was FIRE
loved that shit
I swear medics between V and 2042 forgot that smoke grenades exist
and I feel it was way more of a BF game than BF2042 because again, classes
2042 in general the playerbase (always my team) forgets smoke exists
I mean that's always the case even in BF1 and BFV yet there are still players playing as a Support and Medic nonetheless
ya, because the playerbase doesn't know what it's talking about
and the only thing that makes it a bf game to them is if it's set in a modern time period

What are you talking about? BFV smokes are literally spammed alot just finished playing BFV an hour ago and most players are spamming smokes
What if they just make all the guns similarly good so nobody overuses one catagory
I think he means 2042 smokes are underused
reread it, I'm saying medics from V -> 2042 forgot how to use their smokes
Oh no idea with 2042 cuz I skip that game but in BFV everyone is spamming smokes
To the point like it looks like Snoop Dogg's party
they could restrict smoke grenades to just assault
...
lmao
again, this would make them more of a team player
and reduce the spam of nades
unless everyone decides to go assault
Probably, honestly they should go to support as welll imo
Pretty much what BFV is doing and nailed, every gun per class has their own strong weapon
assault having the "best" kill tools in the game is their team play
but that team play sucks ass
Every class should use smokes
I agree especially if you want to play aggressively
Smoke helped alot
says who? you? The assault player flanking and killling, diverting attention away from other spots on the map is team play
and having the gadgets that excel in that, enable that
personally, give them an insertion beacon too
so my flanks get that much better
you guys just want to play cod 😭
Would also lead to less snipers
hi
the comet!
gonna blow your brain, BF and COD have always been very close to each other
I don't think so
I'll keep cooking
Assault's perma gadget should be insertion beacon, medpen should be an optional gadget 🗣️
you really havent been around either franchise long
The best part of BF4's teamplay specifically w its gadgets is that theres a consistent principle.
All the classes can do basic actions. (Heal automatically, use vehicles and counter vehicles, retain ammo, defend areas, spot enemies, etc) Every class, though, can excel at some of those jobs more than others. The benefits they can give to themselves (healing, resupplying, spotting, repairing, etc) apply to other players as well, and all this hasnt been as true as other BF games.
aight, compare BF3 and MW3
and tell me what's similar about them
because BC2 / BF3 / BF4 was nothing but the playerbase crying about how each new BF was just COD
Gameplay wise? yes. Immersion and Authenticity? No
Spawn beacon would probably be best on recon and medpen should never return
If you want to heal it shouldnt be an entirely selfish gadget. Get a damn medpouch or medbox and use it on your buddies
Spawn beacon on recon would just make half the team sit at the edge of the map
I think the closest are 2042 and MWII
nah just give assault Zain's health regen perk
lmaooo
Still a pointless perk honestly, its literally ripped from CoD lmao
Recon's perma gadget isn't even spawn beacon in BF6, it's TUGS, recon is more selfish than assault
quick fix makes sense for CoD because engagements are closer together, it doesnt in BF
go play 1942/COD1, BF2/COD2 and see how similar the gunplay/movement is
a shooter is a shooter
BF2 has more movement 🤣
the thing that differentiates them is how they play
I think you forgot to add an I there 
and they are getting closer!
if you play 2042
and you play MWII
it's the same shit
2042 is faster than MWII
yup and BF still has giant maps, combined arms and classes
BF2 REMASTERED WILL SAVE THE FRANCHISE
me using an AR on assault/medic/engineer doesn't change their class functions
classes that no longer feel like classes, and again, cod has GIANT maps
look up Ground War
there's helis, there's tanks
True but its what complements what
so that's COD copying BF
but I thought BF only copys COD
THEY CAN COPY BOTH OML
no my point is they are blending
so isn't your argument that COD now feels like BF cuz they copied COD?
no
CoD copied BF
and BF copied Cod
And now
they are blending together
and you can barely tell them apart
because there's nothing unique about BF
because classes don't mean shit
you mean like they've been sharing ideas with each other (and medal of honor when it was around) for the past 20 years
damn, artists innovating and sharing ideas
you are driving me insane >:(
It got a bad rap because it wasn't a war game, which yeah I can get the arguement, but the setting was so fresh and unique for me. You have to remember this was at the PEAK of the "stop making reskins" angst with people getting tired of the "annual sequel"
they still do. Engineers are still the only ones with at mines, at grenades, launchers etc.
medics/support still the only ones that can give ammo, heal others and revive outside the squad
but it doesn't feel like you are changing classes
it feels like you are changing gadgets
today you learned the gadgets are the classes
weapons and gadgets are
you aint conveincing me
I aint convincing you
we are stuck here
We don't know if weapons are class locked or not
I would prefer them to be class locked but this is just alpha
Pre alpha
They most likely haven't decided how to distribute guns yet
i'm just making assumptions from the amount of sniper rifles in the files
sniper rifles are 1HK but they're map pick ups only
I would just give recon DMRs and make them another basic assault 🥶
can we get dmrs that don't suck like in 2042
tbh
they should just give DMRs to recons aside from Bolt Actions
because DMRs are ass in any other role
I mean they are always ass
but still
2042s DMRs are great 
SVK, G428, VCAR
never liked how they felt
BSVM is legit better than many SMGs
but maybe because I keep beating my head against the wall with the DM7
DM7 is F tier
i remember when it was good
trust me, I feel it
two shot kill
What was?
DM7
yea that thing is nuts
i found alot of the dmrs have become compleate trash lateley
SVK still dominates, VCAR is good if you have good trigger finger
G428 is also really good
Wait the 6p67 kord??? The modern day AEK????
Unrelated to the discussion, but I just played MW19 Ground war again, as I know many BF players played that mode when it released.
God is it an awful experience. Campers fest + killstreaks galore + MW19's TTK + elephants footsteps = excruciating moments 
I hope the next BF is nothing like that lmao
GG
k bai 👋
Hey it was deleted.

Pretty much
nah dude, COD and BF are practically the same because they share a few things
you can slide in both... boom the same game
weapons that might not be class locked... boom the same game
MW2019’s ground war was a shitty attempt to capture battlefield’s conquest mode.
EA looking at adding a BR to BF... boom the same game
No lmao
Ground War is just for grinding your snipers lol
No flow to the games at all
Though I will say the moving helicopter spawn was a neat gimmick
hipfire on bsv trash though
📏 I was discussing with Grok about how there be options to toggle between the imperial system and the metric system impact both the development and gameplay aspects of a new installment of the next Battlefield video game. 🎮
Grok mentioned?
🤮
lol 😥 I apologize if submitting this post caused others to fallen ill.
"I was discussing with Grok".... You see, there was the first problem
people use Grok beyond finding ways for it to dunk on Elon?
Humanity is cooked and these "AI" aren't even terminators yet 😭
like at least let us get to the time travelling, blood thirsty robots 
No because if we start time traveling then so will the AI
I didn’t know you could do that
afaik, it's pretty easy to get Grok to say elon is incredibly stupid. look it up, a lot of the questions fed to it and answers are hilarious
Is it as hilarious as the reviews from Amazon about Haribo Sugar Free Gummy Bears?
I love reading those lol 😆
Yeah it's so dumb how people compare everything eith Cod
BF players acting superior because they play X arcade shooter over Y arcade shooter
It won't be
I’m pretty pumped by all the US Army vehicles in Labs/BF6(?) so far. Army instead of USMC is a nice change of pace (I know the factions have always sort of been a mix of both, but the vehicles are usually mostly one or the other)
I missed the Bradley 🙂
bro it took 7 years of development and invested big money to make Black mith Wukong, whats up with EA AAA title nowadays, everybody too lazy?
Opposite. Game dev for the expectations of AAA are grueling and require a ton of people and time.
It’s not just the visuals and animations, it’s also the content fans demand a game launch with.
need to spent time and effort to make a right game title, not copy and paste 2042 labs bro
im smelling stock marketing again lol
They could make a game the size and scope of Bad Company 2 and I’d love it, but the mainstream space would move on so fast. The competition for your time are F2P games like Fortnite. People spend 100 hours each week playing like two games for their entire life. That’s the market they gotta compete with.
mirco transaction fast pace stocking skin for sale you meant,
I mean sorta. But also releasing a new map or maps every couple months, constantly patching and balancing, adding weapons, and yes, the stupid skins. But guess what happens when you make a game without all that? People disengage because there’s a new season of some other game with new STUFF
The problem is there’s just too much to play. The market is flooded. And 90% of gamers spend 90% of their time on 9-10 live service games.
2042 made out of from basement,not even in a apartment complex,
I mean even if you use 2042 as an example, it was only able to achieve the state of success it’s had (and it HAS improved a lot) thanks to live service. It sucks but that’s just how it is.
Even Battlefield 5, a game people like now, took a long time to get into a state where people seem to really enjoy it. Do you remember how negative people were when it launched?
That’s why game dev takes so much time.
I think the fans would rather wait another 3 years bro,for a decent one,
Honestly the sweet spot today are smaller AA studios making games in Unreal Engine. Studios like the guys making Squad, or Insurgency. They don’t have huge teams so they’ve got less pressure. But those games don’t look as pretty as AAA games and their Discord servers aren’t as big.
They still need to generate profit though. Game dev sucks right now. It’s just an endless chase for post-launch consumer spending. That’s why they don’t make a lot of big single player games anymore. Selling a lot of copies is less important than selling a lot of DLC.
CoD is a game that isn’t really about playing CoD anymore. It’s about keeping you hooked into a storefront to buy skins.
Same with Fortnite. It’s just a big commercial.
Yeah my bad. I dunno what that dude is complaining about anyway.
comparing a battlefield game to black myth wukong is crazy
no not complaining , is to compare, use time and effort into a game ,that's what a game mean to be meant.
AAA
standard quality .
use jedi survivor or something
he was complaining that the next BF (that's in pre-alpha atm, mind you) is a copy/paste of 2042
im saying why it lost its title ?

nobody wants to refund a game, we all hyped for preorders, bro
when I heard the "screaming voice when you down" im like....ohh damnggg it's that again lol!

fkdup bro
dealta force is made in China, and its free! come on bro! get your azz up!
Also they completely changed genre mid way through development, newer people at Dice, also EA not wanting to wait and forcing them to release earlier then they should
Don't give the rando attention.
Ok
they need people from who served in Military ,with story lines
rofl now i seen people for offened lol

its not fortnite baby game
your fire!
anime skins when dice
I'm not a fan of leaks but I'm really liking the selection of weapons that were leaked.
Ace 32, ksg, scar L, sc.
some game are for kids, some game are for big boys,
Me seeing MSBS: 
go to bed,go play your fortnite,eat your donut.
Hey everyone, I just ask that you bring back platoons and spectator mode.
See, this is reasonable feedback right here 
Oh dude the Tavor is an easy good one too.
You can tell this dude didn't come from reddit because they still have some braincells over the other guy. 

Emblem creator coming back when
That’s the important question, I want my pringles man emblem back
Never
The few rotten apples ruined it for everyone
(Also no money to be made since it's freeeeee)
I'm glad PP Bizon won't be in the game 
Spectating is returning for stuff like Battle Royale
Tho not normal MP
Oh you mean spectating camera
yea nvm I got no clue
They can keep that to the BR, just not in MP

I’m hoping they put more effort into the voice work than 2042. BF1 is still my gold standard there.
I mean, the stuff we heard already sounds like there is good effort in it
Some are still spotty but it sounds better than 2042 already
The audio design is perfect, but the voicelines are thankfully placeholders from 2042.
I’m looking forward to see the US uniforms. So far only British for NATO I think.
The concept art US Army looks so good though. I hope they carry that into the actual game.
Someone’s gotta clear out the point so that the other classes can assist more effectively tho
Pings for 2042 are the worst
when ping not for Labs News channel: 
there's a confirmation that you registered interest
as for invites....... good luck 
it's like winning the lottery basically
I don't think I received the registered email
I didn't either
I registered hour 1 so maybe that's why. I think the registration email is only for people who did it afterwards
Oh word, I signed up previously like 3 days after the launch of the sign-up cause of the queue but never got an email.
I guess I shall pray and bathe in copium
It sucks because I signed up so fast, but I realize that has nothing to do with getting picked.
I did get an email confirming I registered though. So that’s good.
yeup
a EA welcome to playtest or a battlefields lab specific one
ive always wondered since I just got an EA one, and I didn't know if it would say battlefield lab specifically
God the movement arguments have gotten so bad on the Subreddit, there are people actively trying to deny zou-zouing was a thing in Battlefield 3 and 4 💀
i don't dare go round those parts
Movement in any modern battlefield to this date has had very unrealistic movement besides like BF2
Funny you should say that cause uhhhh
https://youtu.be/xXX09xssmkE
I WAS BOUT TO POST THE SAME LINK 
Ohhh okay so basically every battlefield mb
Hardline and 2042 have the most unrealistic movement tho don’t they
Maybe 5
I'd argue BFV's movement got pretty bad at times
being able to change your direction mid-slide as if the grounds made of ice is pretty obnoxious
it's a video game, who cares if it's unrealistic lol. Keep it within the style of BF and that's all
Though the people trying to argue that this battlefield should be more like ARMA or like milsim paced should just delete their accounts atp
based response
I’ve seen that dumb shit on the subreddit as well people are genuinely trying to push for that
Battlefield has always been larger scale fast paced chaos
Really the only Battlefield games that arguably had "slow, methodical, tactical movement" was Bad Company 1, 2, and 1943 and that's because they were built on Frostbite 1 and also built with console in mind which a lot of devs didn't feel had the capacity for more advanced movement at the time (they got rid of proning ffs) and people lost their minds about how dumbed down the movement was
I’d want BC2s destruction tho regardless ngl
i disagree on BC2s level of destruction. too much of it and it can ruin map flow
Plus no cover
If not building destruction then terrain deformation
i prefer bf3/4 where you can destroy stuff, but it doesn't ruin flow or remove cover
yup
BC2 and BF1 have immaculate terrain deformation
They could add that
I still think BFV had it figured out with the fortification system
Let us level the maps, but also let us build back up defenses
Every war game should have terrain deformation or at least some level of destruction imo
You'd be surprised how many players are willing to build fortifications. Every time I hop on BFV there's always 1 or 2 people on an objective building up the fortifications while everyone else has moved on or hell in some cases, the entire team will really quickly put up the fortifications and then move on
I wasn't really keen on the ramps that went all over the place and you can only see with a hammer equipped if some1 destroyed it after them, and not sure I want half the team hammering. Also a bomber may just take them out in one go, they weren't very sturdy.
More fixed gun emplacements if maps were big enough and fixing those I could go for.
My personal favorite part when it came to the fortifications was the barbed wire and the sandbags
Someone at some point suggested when you took a position, it just built the fortifications by default rather than being player made.
Eh, I think that would take away player initiative and remove a promotion of team work
Battlefield V matches could be decided by how well one team fortifies and holds it's objectives over the other team
and how well they fortified was dependant on how committed their teammates were to builting them up and repairing them as the match goes on
Why would DICE remove that layer of depth from the game?
Not sure that was my experience of the game. I personally got fed up with the challenges, so your team is just "doing keepie uppies on the side line for a beanie" and saw fortifications as a part of that.
I preffered the set stages of destruction, you could have your favorite places for each stage of a building.
Fortifications in BFV were great. People say they want everything to be destructible but if you do that then infantry is basically left as sitting ducks in a barren wasteland. Fortifications were a great way to allow for destruction while not leaving infantry the ability to create some cover
I'll die mad that people complained that it made BF into Fortnite because it was nothing like how building in Fortnite works
BF players complaining about a mechanic that is vaguely shared with another game = BF becoming that game
Most gamers in general are dumb and don't actually know what they want
if games were only made as gamers wanted them then we'd never get innovative games
i really liked fortifications
it allowed the capture points to be a little different game to game, and kept there from being an obvious meta to approaching and taking points
honestly I wish they'd be looking more at BFV for things to incorporate into the new BF than 3 or 4. The movement was great (although diving on your back with an MG was overpowered at points), the class balance was great, squad call ins were a great way to implement commander like mechanics without gating all of that power to one person on a team who might just sit on a hill sniping while dropping themselves supplies and calling in artillery when it's convenient for them. the weapon balancing was usually great (assuming we're talking about periods where the TTK was fast and people weren't bullet sponges). I even liked attrition because it encouraged players sticking with their squad to get ammo/heals.
oh yeah, mechanically BFV is phenomenal
i definitely don't want them to look to it for a blueprint for supporting a game though 😂
it took so long to get that game to be great
the lack of support is the biggest strike against it, yeah, but that's on EA/DICE
aside from that it was the bugs and the time it took them to fix them. that and I found it annoying you could use faction specific skins in theaters where they don't make sense. I get that BF isn't a sim and I've made my peace with that but it's jarring to see germans in the pacific
I had been waiting for BF to come back to WWII since BF1942 (which I built my first PC to play back in 2002), and it was disappointing how little breadth it had in comparison between the factions, maps and mechanics (real naval battles, artillery system)
then they rug pulled me again with 2042 seeming to hint at a 2142-like setting but not delivering on that for 2142 fans
i'm kinda on the side of, i don't want region-locked weapons (lemme use the STG in the pacific if i want to!) so i can extend that thinking to character skins too
I don't mind region locked weapons since that's how BF1942 and a lot of great mods for it were, but I get why they weren't locked since there's gameplay balance to consider. skins though don't really make sense beyond "they might have paid for this so we should let them use it wherever to make them happy"
love fortifications.
From the leaks I see mostly BF V/2042 with a BF 3/4 skin
Same
DICE/Vince can pay lip service to BF 3/4 to appease those crybabies but from what’s actually shown, modern setting BFV (gunplay/movement).
Still hoping the first batch of playtests were truly just to test movement/gunplay and they start to layer features and mechanics like fortifications/squad call ins into the mix
same. if I'm being honest I'm hoping they just drop the modern setting and say they're making a BFV2 lol. modern military settings are boring to me but I know that's what the FPS market wants. plus you then need to deal with balancing jets which turns into them being OP death machines that carpet bomb your spawn or being useless. also the fact they look goofy as hell since the maps can never be big enough to really convey their speed remotely close to realistically
I think BF is due for another modern setting personally
After that, give us a game or two of different eras, still think it’s important for them to cycle through the last ~100 years of conflict stages
agree.
I like it on some of the weapons, such as GEW, SFAR and AC9
great for cover. more than for impeding the enemy's advance.
Good cover allows you to impede the enemy advance 
But no seriously dice, give us fortifications
Another leaked gameplay clip came out with the guy not being thumbless and he nailed a really clean slide cancel
indeed. but i meant cover as primary goal.
complete opposite for me, i hope they stick to modern and maybe go back to future like 2142
historical settings are boring and too restrictive
How far back does modern go for you? Is Vietnam/late era of Cold War more modern or historical for you
Cuz a late sixties to mid 80s era BF would be fun
Or, depending on what their live service plans look like with this game. After the first 4 season, they start era hopping for seasons. Like a BC2 Vietnam dlc
And the Reddit Community is complaining more than ever
I disagree 
late cold war could still be modern to some extent i suppose, but still not as interesting as modern day to me unless it's a narrative about what went on around that time
i.e. black ops cold war
modern weapons tend to feel too samey to me. everything boils down to an AR, a shotgun or a sniper rifle. machine guns are just ARs with more bullets and worst accuracy. SMGs are just assault rifles with slightly worse accuracy. I would like to see them return to the 2142 setting though. Not having to use real weapons lets them do fun stuff and reduces people saying "this gun would kill you in one shot in real live so it should do that in the game"
can definitely agree with that, a futuristic setting gives them complete freedom for creativity and innovation
hell yeah give me exosuits
and bring back titan mode while they're at it
then again my opinions of BF2142 are based on where it was months to a year after launch after they had put a lot more work into it
Really it looks like BFV movement/gunplay, Hardline style melee kills and BC destruction.
I really wouldn't be surprised if this turns out to be BC3
didn't get it a launch because it seemed too similar to BF2, actually ended up liking it more than BF2
for me, modern starts with the gulf war
Gulf War/Operation "Just Cause"
BC3 would be bliss, but they can't make the campaign like they did back then
Based on that it would be unfavorable to make it another bad company title
Mmmm how so?
i'd hope they don't because bc2's was ass
I thought it was pretty funny
rather they do something new, trying to call it bc3 will just be very obvious nostalgia bait
My money is they just call it Battlefield
As a “reset” going forward for the franchise
Make it a live service experience?
Agreed
As if "A love letter to fans" wasn't? Lol
portal was the most perfect example of obvious nostalgia bait lmao
If this one launches well, and they don’t need to spend a year+ fixing it like 4/2042 etc. ya I can see them supporting it heavily for 3-4 years
Problem is every time they do something "new", or try to reinvent the wheel, it ends up a mess...2042 case in point
Impossible to replicate the kind of humor they had in the previous bc titles today
portal was such a disappointment
Why would they replicate humor from 15 years ago? Humor has evolved
I'm the guy that wanted to play BF1942 again but it was just off enough to be offputting
Right...sensitive people. Gotcha
You can still have edgy, racey humor
also possibly controversial opinion but I couldn't care less about campaigns in BF. stop trying to chase CoD. If I wanted to play a CoD campaign I'd play CoD
Playing 1942 maps with modern rendering distances 
Military humor and civilian humor....BIG DIFFERENCE LOL
lol yeah there's also the problem of trying to translate that to modern hardware
Thanks for taking the words out of my mouth
honestly i think the biggest issue with trying to do another bad company is that the voice actors, the developers, the writers are all gone and moved on at this point. it isn't just that "errr people too sensitive for muh jokes" its that the people that made the entire experience what it is aren't going to be the ones making a new one
Navy Vet 04-07, Submariner USS Jimmy Carter, and VP16 Squadron. @cobalt gate trust me I know lol
Yeah, that's the real problem with the idea of BC3
The amount of leaks good lord.
At this point just release the game as a Early Access at this point lmfao
BC2 didn’t “age bad” because they’re offensive. They aged bad because they’re a product of their time
it also didn't age bad people love that game lmao
Currently in service but I feel we understand each other on the question of humor in that game
Awesome, what branch?
For the people that played it it didn’t age bad. People that didn’t play it back in 2010, playing it now the jokes would fly over their heads
oh yeah lol
BC2 is still fun today
humor's evolved to favor smarter jokes than that nowadays lol
Played it recently
Doubt they’d get offended, humor just evolves
but its still a great game
Ofc, I love my memories of playing that game with my mates
Loved being a bushwookie with the VSS? The silenced semi auto can’t remember the name
this is exactly it. Nobody cares about some military humor lol the problem is that bc3 won't be a successor to bc2, it'll just be bf6 with the bad company name slapped onto it (and all the modern monetisation that comes with live service)
spot on
there's no reason to call it BC3 unless they're actually going to try and continue those games, which they obviously won't
It’s only a bc2 successor if they take prone out of bf6
Well bad company is also really really old
Fat chance they would continue with the name bad company
Only one's who'd be hyped are oldheads and veterans of the series
i just hope this new title is great. no way to tell until after its released, but i was pretty let down with 2042 after being stoked about it and i want this one to be as good as anything from the BF3 to BFV run
and the ones who are stupid enough to fall for it just like they fell for portal
as a halo forge veteran i was stoked for portal
big problem is they just didn't do anything with it lol
so much potential
yeah, if only it was used for anything more than just luring people back to the franchise
I feel like the real hazard with the next title is trying to match the pace of CoD with gameplay, I feel battlefield played better with slower paced gameplay, for example see BF4 compared to 2042
Here we go again
That's my two cents on the topic anyway
battlefield players honestly have no fucking idea what they want
they should make it so if you have an accuracy and ads penalty if you're standing instead of crouchwalking!!!! 
Just FYI, running speed in BF4 is faster than 2042
BF4 was extremely fast
2042 has basically the exact same move speeds as BF4, the only difference is the added jumping and sliding mechanics
It was also sorta clunky with the shitty vaulting/mantling and getting stuck on random debris all the time
judging by how little the dive moves players forward, they're probably going to be cautious with movement mechanics
Different maps and game modes obviously had differently paced gameplay, I really liked golmud railways if it helps my example
Vehicle farm maps?
This convinces me that most people played default FOV
Fr
Definitely not
although i will say, current call of duty has an average first engagement after spawning time at like, sub-five seconds. i think part of the "slower battlefield pace" is how much longer the average first engagement takes place after spawn
I mean, fair play how you want, but playing at 50 FOV makes the game look/feel slower
Crank it to 120 and notice BF4 is MUCH faster paced than 2042
More or so my point
Even without the zouzou etc
Nah dude, me and my squad play tactically by pieing every room
Tactically lol
hey nothing wrong with that, and nothing wrong than giving the players that wanna play aggressively like they have in other BF titles the ability to do so
better player's gonna win that engagement
Any idea as to when the new game is launching?
autumn this year, which may change as the entire industry holds their breath for GTA6
Probably late 2025 (Nov-Dec), if not then most likely first of 2026
Valid guesses, hoping it's gonna not gonna be broken on launch
depends on gta's release most likely
I love how the gaming industry is holding it's breath over a stupid game like GTA lol
a stupid game that's going to destroy anything that releases anywhere near it
It's gonna be GTA in vice city, that's pretty huge
probably the most anticipated title in the last decade
Very much so
That's why it's so stupid. After San Andreas and Vice City I couldn't get into it anymore. Game was too much
tbf, the entire TV industry holds its breath for the super bowl, and the super bowl makes way less money than GTA lol
its a cultural force in entertainment with no parallel
The American TV industry...
Herd mentality more like
almost 9 billion dollars is hard to ignore lol
its the highest grossing media product of all time
Super Bowl?
GTA5
But why
because it was good
^^^
evidently
People are still playing GTA 5 very regularly, hell even in my department we have a console with GTA on it
Guess people really like flying around and beating up hookers
i mean if that's how you see the game then it's no wonder you don't understand lol
Pretty much all you did in GTA1-2-San Andreas and Vice
That's the winning formula evidently
Well GTA 1 and 2 were more about stealing cars lol
I agree, GTA peaked with San Andreas. Everything since has been tainted by Rockstars obsession with prioritizing realism and simulation over just being fun
the games released almost 20 years before gta 5 lmao
online has loads to do and is constantly updated, it's no wonder people still play it regularly with friends
i just wish they hadn't abandoned plans for story expansions
not to mention mods that take it even further
Saint's Row 2-4 and Sleeping Dogs are better GTA-like follow ups than GTA IV onward imo
Even the story is pretty huge in GTA 5
And money
the story is very fun, i only bother with online when friends suggest it
Isn't that all of them nowadays though?
True
That's what it's come to yeah
i didn't really like GTA online. single player was way more fun than dealing with griefers and mtx
eh, Rockstar writing is garbage outside of RDR1
the takes in here are absolutely eye watering today
they tried to make a Max Payne game and completely misread the character and gameplay
Now RDR2...bro that was a game. Still 10/10
also @cobalt gate you're totally right about the american tv industry thing. i was just illustrating the point with the analogy
True
World cup would be incomparable
Off topic though Isn't it in America next year?
and the crazy thing is that GTA5 still makes twice as much money as the world cup lmao
its literally incomparable
Oh word
Insane
Canada, US, and Mexico!! I think its so cool that its North America hosted rather than just US
Ain't gonna cheap for anybody in the stands haha, they gotta book many flights
Wild growing up watching the gaming industry blow up like it did. My Dad use to say "You'll never make money playing video games" pissed him showing him my first Twitch payout lol
as a musician i'm blaming this statistic on spotify's abysmal artist pay rather than the size of the gaming industry 
real lmao
The artistic field is struggling huh
That's also probably in part that actual musicians know their worth and record labels just want mass produced cheap slop.
its hard to justify spending money on art with basic necessities being so expensive. i don't blame anyone not able to buy albums or go to shows
unfortunately sounds very familiar in the gaming industry too
And AI is going to make shit even worse somehow, not like half the industry isn't already "sampling"
Pretty much everything made from 2010 to present
feels like these types of art always end up like this, just soulless and made for quick cash
It's almost a reason to celebrate when an actual album comes out these days.
Proper albums lol yes
its defs harder to find great music nowadays, but the jazz/funk/fusion scene is absolutely brimming with absurdly good players and albums
If I remember correctly Megadeth and iron maiden released something in recent years
New stuff too
That and it seems these "artist" thr big ones at least push this easy crap out with a couple of cords and the same lyrics 30 times in the song.
LMAO remember when every song had a line that ended with "....toniiiight" in it
pain
BlackEye Peas
I don't like peas...
Tonight going to be a good night repeat 10x
I be on my hands and knees every morning praying for an email to playtest
It's funny, read the lyrics to idk any pop song recently, then read the lyrics to 46&2 by Tool and tell me who's more creative lol
3rd grade reading level lyrics, repeat chorus 20x, lucky if there's a second verse, bridges optional, actual instruments not required
y'all think next round of playtest emails will go out on Monday? Or think they'll wait another week or two to make tweaks first
As an Avalanches/Pretty Lights fan, stop talking shit about sampling lmao
Judas Priest also put out a killer album
Judas priest is always a banger
Pretty Lights at Bonnaroo last year was so fucking good
Sunrise set was surreal. Total wook fest tho
Sampling itself can be OK, especially transformative use. I put quotes on sampling because these days people don't even bother changing anything and half the time they even use the original recordings lol.
Man, last concert I went to was Shinedown/Saliva back in 05. Before that was Woodstock 99
100% was just poking fun at it
i try to go to one every six weeks or so
i saw hans zimmer this year, that was incredible
Isn't Hans Zimmer like orchestra???
yeah! he had a MASSIVE band and plays the movie soundtracks he writes as huge rock pieces
I guess that too is a concert
Yeaaah
He's the one responsible for dollars trilogy if I remember right
Also goated franchisw
I don't who this one guy is but it plays on the radio at work and they just use the masters for Bon Jovi from the 80s but he tries to act like he's collaborating with him during the song as if Jon is there in studio with him
that's ennio morricone that did dollars
also one of the greatest composers of all time
heck yeah
Can't remember something of hans Zimmer off the top of my head...
Star wars perhaps?
lion king, dark night, inception, interstellar, cod mw2 (lol), pirates of the caribbean, dune
star wars was john williams
Pardon for my trivia knowledge haha
no i haven't! is that game good
Tekken OSTs have always been surprisingly good
mw2 being in the middle of all that is so insane
still can't believe it
Shout out to Tekken 3
no wonder it sounded so good
my last tekken was tekken 2, way back when
Yes, it is, if u like fighters right up ur alley
Tekken 2 really is way back when
So is 3
I started from 6
I too am from way back when
6 and tag 2
millenials unite
Figures...
hahaha
Turning 20 this year... Unc status approaching rapidly
God you're almost half my age lol
plenty of actual uncs in here
Beyond unc now, actual grandpa gamer
fossil gamer
Oh god don't say that, US will lay me to waste for the fuel
lmao
gotta remember that the 30s and 40s people have been using the things that inspired discord our whole lives
this is just the current one
Brother I too used Skype and teamspeak
irc chans and aol and msn and all that
oh god msn
LMAO
See now that's behind me
this guy knows
Yeah I was gonna say forums and IRC lol
Ancient internet...
Can still feel the tinnitus from dial up
Having to do LAN parties because online gaming meant 5s delay
halo LAN was some of the best gaming memories i have
I assume DOOM and quake multiplayer?
counter strike too
Truly symbols of the times
Doom, Quake, Serious Sam, Unreal Tournament was huge for us, Starcraft as well
The only game where wall humping is a strat
Oh fuck I also forgot, Descent 2 was mad shit on LAN
Came down with a fever this morning... Doctor's appointment on Sunday, gotta stay sick so I can get some sick leave off this damn base, any tips? For staying sick and high fever
Now that leaks are pretty much released daily and people, since this week, are now digging in the game files, do you believe that BF Labs remains a good idea?
Staying sick is not a strat in my repertoire
Only thing that can get me off this stinking base
It's in mine. Basically, you take a bit of treatment for the symptoms, but not for the cause eheh
Gonna sleep with the window open again
Yes
Every MP game these days should be regularly playtested by more than the devs and Q/A team
So... liquor?
Well, looking forward to see how the Devs balance out the game when it's now a war on social medias about basic features.
Given we now know 95% of the game's features, they should just release the game lmao
Maybe? 
I mean, depends on what exactly is being datamined. if it's actual files, or references to files. could be cruft that hasn't been removed from the build for all we know
BFV and 2042 had a ton of datamined stuff that never made it into the game
True
Or very late
Y’all got me in the gym now blasting the avalanches wishing I was some where in the Mediterranean
Thanks
Max gains
Gotta get the Ibiza bod
I just want to see some US Army skins (and robust customization for all of NATO obviously). The loading screen art has really accurate US Army soldiers. But haven’t seen anything in game yet.
Any idea how many people have been selected for playtests so far?
N+1
Somewhere between 1 and 6 billion
I liked bullet sponges
Assures I wont be beamed from 120 meters in 0.2 seconds
Real problem is Bad Company name isn't know that much
2042 is slower 😂
a few thousand
Bad Company 3 doesn’t make sense with the factions though. I mean NATO vs just US Army alone.
Yes. I actually do. It creates positive opinions from outside and the devs can still gather feedback of playtesters
new concept art looks insane
Was BF4 CTE a good idea?
you'll have your answer there

