#battlefield-labs-discussion
1 messages · Page 55 of 1
unique 🚫 🟰 good map lol
if your game is purely designed to die in 2 years then thats just fucked
it's fun
If they make a polished and smooth product with a bunch of content at launch then yes
along with Siene Crossing, Grand Bazzar, Tehran Highway (rush)
yeah but what i mean is that i hope dice doesn't release a new bf game too soon
i hope bf7 is far far away and bf6 is made to last
Just no fuckin micro-Trans, bring DLC's back for fucks sake
look at games like rust and dayz, albeit different genre but they've existed for 10+ years and peaking playercounts still
its not impossible to make a game to last more than 1 year lol
premium and DLCs are forever gone, might as well get used to that
ewwww no, I like my post launch maps to actually see play
i dont want dlcs anymore either lmao
Like GTA online or R6S? No way
i dont mean it should last 10 years lol
I played 2042 for free beyond buying it initially
but games nowadays last like 1 year max before having majority of its playerbase lost
bf games aren't designed with the scope of more than 2 years. they're literally use and throw games
Just release a finished game with all maps, guns, and vehicles, and we can pay/earn for skins for vehicles and weapons as it always has been, just no COD shit
the fact that 2042 continued development for over 3 years baffles me and tells me dice knows how to keep a game alive and updated, but i bet you its just the design decision from the board to make more money
I mean it's also the fact that their leads had prior experience at making.. cod vanguard..
and.. candy crush

it's 100% due to shareholder pressure. Chunky $70 entry fees for 1 mil+ people hits harder than an mtx store used by a few within a dying player count
the problem is BF6 can’t afford to fail, because if it fails, that’s it,” there is no next Battlefield, the community can’t just tell DICE to give up and move on to the next one, because they already tried, and we ended up with BF2042
stop with the hyperbolic stuff, BF license is too valuable. At worst it'd go into hibernation for a few years
was it vanguard? thought it was warzone
EA has to do it right, because if there numbers aren't up after it's released, no more EA
modern cod basically is warzone with singleplayer and a few 6v6 maps tacked on that they charge $70 for anyways

even after the failure of 2042 interest in BF is still high as hell when you look at the BFLabs sign up and videos coming out about BF6
@mossy marten it was WW2
But youtubers told me so it must be true
most of that was recycled content + scraps from the art team
i meant the dude who moved from CoD, thought he was mainly a warzone dev/lead
oh no I'm not talking about bryon breede
I'm talking about the former lead for 2042
YouTubers are horrible, I'm not gonna believe some rich punk that plays games 24/7 over an article by EA or what I can find
he lead monetisation in cod vanguard and candy crush, he was put in charge for the whole game

people really think one of the most valuable IPs in the FPS space will just go poof after a bad game or two lmao
No because he’s right this battlefield can not afford another failure, DICE has already lost the trust of its community. If this game flops it’s gonna be another MOH.
I mean yeah corpo pressure played a role but it absolutely isn't the sole reason nor is it the major one.
Yeah lol, like Halo is still alive
Or BioWare
''Alive'' but still
"failure", 2042 is still clearly making money or else they wouldn't be releasing new events and cosmetics for it
I agree with zeethos, I mean look at need for speed, that's in hibernation due to Unbound, they'll do it to BF too
and he's working on the supposed BR anyways, not really involved in the main mp from what I've seen
not really, a lot of it was well developed and yeah battlepasses were small but u cant say it was mostly scraps and recycled content..
There is no way you’re this naive
and I guarantee when the announce the next one people will eat it up despite the problems the series has had for a decade
ah
Ya bud, facts are facts
They could've stopped updating 2042 past season 4 if it was such a failure. They were contractually obliged to do 4 seasons. Not 7 seasons + mini season events.
they're not going to waste resources paying an art/live service team to push new content for a game
they were going to originally, season 4 was a dump of leftover ideas and that's where we got shit like the spring grenades
I personally think they're doing it for testing/training reasons as well
very noticeably half assed to the stuff that came before it
you gave me ptsd by saying those 2 words

I swear if they are back in bf6....
i mean, there's worse stuff already in the game (imho) 
I forgot spring grenades were in the game until I was checking out how many kills I had with each grenade
anyway i popped in here because i so badly want to see brains melt when all the people asking for "bf4 movement" back die to a guy air strafing a corner
Yeah lol
We need air strafing + controllable slide + slidejump chaining 😂
people who want "cqc! cqc!! dense maps!" are not going to like it when they get spammed like hell there 
Only because the game saw a good amount of players after the game got fixed otherwise EA would’ve cut support
we need the signal app so we can leak our teammates position on randoms 
i would say what there is from leaks, but i'd rather not get timed 
vault off a medic bag into a controllable slide, cancel it into an airstrafe, while dolphin diving onto my back
2042 has redacted, a mega meat grinder, never see it in there
👆
or urban maps like Haven
I heard one almost every 20sec on there
I only play 2042 because of infantry only modes already, can't bother with vehicle farmers 😂
CQC Dense maps> Panzerstorm like maps
you can get so many multis by spamming them on chokepoints
CQC is very sweaty though, every sweat is playing on CQC playlist
opposed to any other explosive I can do that with?
Infantry BT or Frontlines or even Domination are more chill
I farm more chokepoints with Zain and SPH launcher pre nerf than anything
i brought the spring grenades up because they're just silly, like all the other silly stuff that got dumped in s4
Operation Metro is the greatest map of all time and it’s CQC
I'll take spring grenades over the long list of more cancerous explosive spam in this game's history
Once again this is speculation on my part, if DICE and Battlefield go under, we won’t be seeing anymore Battlefield, for a long time, and the next time we will see a game like Battlefield, will be from an indie dev, and will not know how long that will happen
name an explosive that can bounce twice, allowing you to reach far into an area from standing perpendicular to it
begging battlefield players to try games other than battlefield, metro is so mid in the grand scheme of infantry FPS maps
BF3 had an entire map pack of better CQC maps
😭
jesus what's that grenade launcher called
I run by and hear a nade and assume I'll be fine, but nope it bounces to me and before I can react I'm dead. Every single time 
or BF4 ucav from across the map
Season 4 introduced Cav Brawler, SPH grenade launcher, RM68(pre spread), Super 500(pre shotty nerf) and RPT31 appearently
even bf1 had surprise bangers like prise de tahure
So you want to be running on an open field for 20 minutes?
nah there's an underbarrel launcher that you can bounce a grenade around corners with
LVG? or something
I'm talking about 2042's playlist, every sweat plays on it
yes, the people who come to the game for the FPS gameplay pick the mode with the highest fight density
Yeee I remember that season launch. Zain with the rm68, sph and super 500 all pre nerf was so fucking stupid
Yeah but it had the Turning Tide expansion, which is what I believe is the reason naval combat never came back
back when zain had 5 + 5 on his airburst
hella fun though
wait no, that season was blasco
I dunno man, it's easier to farm players on Domination, Rush XL, Frontlines, infantry BT etc.
zain still had his 5 + 5 though
What is funny, the only map that players like from the turning tide expansion, is a map that has nothing to do with naval combat
You expect this playerbase to want anything other than the same 3-5 maps from BF4?
no but i can dream 😭
i think the franchise is hosed but i have a hard time giving up
Yet people still want naval combat in next BF 🤣
This fanbase is clueless
BF4's naval maps weren't fan favorites either
the subreddit talks about Paracel Storm as if it was a picasso painting
and the naval storm dlc
Pearl Market is the only one I'd like to see a remake of
you do have to remember
if you have an opinion even slightly off from theirs, they will act like pirahnas smelling blood 
I currently have a backlog of 40 notifications from a few comments I made on r/battlefield yesterday
in the unpopular opinion: sliding doesn't belong in BF thread
Issue is that BF literally doesn't support sea combat besides vehicles, you can't even shoot your primary while you are in water
Give us a 5th class... Scuba
you can fire while swimming and your class gadget is a repurposed grappling hook/harpoon gun
i want to see a bf without a medic class just to watch defib mains flounder under the weight of having to actually play the game
I want to see a bf without recon first
Give assault the respawn beacon
since they're supposed to be the frontlines/flank class
Btw Paracel Storm is another BF4 map that has a terrible levolution
Let’s place the trigger of that levolution on a broken turbine that is so far away from the conflict
all the leveolution was bad and made the maps worse off
and the maps were already bad
Actually the only two levolution that got it right was Hainan Resort, and Operation Locker
Give the respawn bacon to squad leaders 
I'm glad that BF Discord is different than the BF subreddit plus much more based too 
make it squad points only 


Well at least for me, the difference between me and those subreddit FREAKS… is that when people don’t see my point of view, I don’t throw a tantrum, I at least listen because that is the point of having an opinion (-v-
choose between shit and dogshit
Naval combat should return in BF6, BF1’s naval combat was amazing, it should include destroyers, frigates, submarines, Cruisers, Amphibious Assault Ships.
Based 
And it would make each match feel more gritty and immersive and just real, All out warfare.
ya but being shit is based, being dogshit is cringe
Could we see presets return?
I dont remember theres a preset system in 2042, I hope it would be in the new bf
BF main sub is so damn miserable. 
"we need movement from bf3/4 again!!"
Have you.. have you acrually played those games since they came out 
rare occurrence of BF sub being based(they're shitting on such opinions)
Reddit communities usually are unbearable
Does pre alpha has ucav
wtf it got removed
Did the mods legit think it was a BF labs leak
if they actually saw a few sec of the video and not just the title, it clearly wasn't and was a joke
Slide is fine, as long as its not spamable, the distance travelled isnt too far, and its only triggerable at max sprint velocity (and it takes time to get to that max velocity)
Amazing
Pretty much
Mf that descriptions sounds like BF1 and you disagreed with me
BF1 slide wasnt like that
You could spam the shit out of it, until it was nerfed when the game as basically on its last legs
BFV slide distance is what he's describing and there are different version of the BF1 Slide, Launch version to Version 3 is fine while the final version isn't
Yeah multiple times and honestly I think they nailed the Turning Tides version (V3) of the slide
People do love to revise how slide in BF1 was tho. Most forget that for the first 12-15 months, there was slide spam shotgun/automatico meta
Yep, I remember that
is it really revising if the game is coming up 9 years now
its been longer with the better sliding than it had been without* it, by several times
I mean the last thing we want is wave dash becoming a thing in Battlefield (0v0;
I seriously doubt they would make any changes to sliding anyway
The leak that has people up in arms is sped up anyway. One of many reasons why these low quality leaks are bad for the game
Well base off of so many past games, you create a tool for the player base to use, and that player base ends up using it in a way the developers never intended or expected for example: BF3 MAV (<v<;
What was MAV ? I haven’t played BF3 so would you or anyone in enlighten me ?
Drone
The casper drone from 2042
Thanks
not quite though MAV is much bigger but they're both drones ye
u used to be able to stand on MAVs
then DICE removed the fun of that
Yeah, cos it broke multiple levels design and flow. It was a good change all in all
and then they removed the hovercraft climbing walls fun as well
You used to be able to stand on Caspers drone too
there's a lot fun "legacy" features they removed
Y'all remember when they showed c4 launching in portal trailer and it's not possible whatsoever? Pepperidge Farms remembers
Appearently it's still possible with 1942 TNT
Back to basics, literally
And don’t get me started on the MAV’s War Crime by committing a Roadkill Massacre in the Operation Metro incident
I’m not joking btw, that’s how ridiculous the MAV was in BF3
Good times. A precursor to modern IRL drone attacks.
The MAV is pretty big and seems to have a decent bit of kit on it, and it can move very fast. I'm sure it'd at least knock you out.
I miss standing on MAVs
Metro was a mess overall in BF3. May it be the mav, the exploit of using USAS-12 frags through walls, the rock glitch, and much more.
This was literally the most fun thing 2042 had to offer
I get why they patched it, but when they did, it started the decline in my interest that led to an uninstall
Not because they took something busted away, but because there weren't really other fun creative battlefield things to do in its place
Idk half the YouTube shorts of it that pop up for me are some creative ass BF moments
They do, they’re just so god awful at the game they play super “tactical” to make up for the reflexes of a some roadkill
While ignoring the 40 people in op locker zouzouing and air strafing
I’d say yes. What the product was during the portion of the game’s peak player base and ongoing live support is important to reference.
Just like it’s important to remember how garbage BF4 was for a solid 12 months
And important to understand the many eras of BF V TTK 
tbf im not a fan of jump shotting and sliding all over the place mechanics i keep seeing in fps, especially in 2042.
also hot take but metro and locker are overrated maps
jump shotting existing since BF3: 
i started with bf4 and didnt really see much of that, granted i started on xbox 360 and then moved to xbox one
The reason you keep seeing them in FPS is because those are pillars of good gameplay mechanics in FPS which are loved by veterans of the genre
let's specifically mention arcade FPS because realism/milsim people will throw a fit 
im not sure if this is sarcasm because it seems like a LOT of people dislike it as well
Since as far back as OG Quake FPS players have been bhopping, air strafing, jump shotting, and dolphin diving.
a lot of people are honestly bad at the game and only complain because people are using the movement while they are't
battlefield has always had some form of movement for years
True, and nothing wrong with a bit of milsim either but its also fair to understand the game's history and audience predominantly being arcadey too.
agreed
sometimes it's whatever to me and sometimes it's a little irritating to deal with because it'll happen randomly in a gunfight
2042 felt like I was playing apex legends 2.0 because the movement felt very similar, obv without most of the movement tech being present in 2042
just felt too fast
2042 movement is nothing like Apex, like actually nothing lol
the grappling hook, b-hopping acceleration, the sliding into jumps?
still nothing like Apex at all
Bhopping in 2042 has massive decays in momentum, and hopping is linear with zero air strafing or directional change
that's true
You also don't have super gliding, aforementioned air strafing, wall bouncing, momentum shifting, tap strafing, and character specific passive like Horizon or Rev
I did say it's missing most of apex movement tech
the game doesnt play as slow as others, i went back to bf5 which has the best gameplay mechanics (overall) in all of the battlefields and found that pacing to be perfect
BFV has good mechanics?
I don't think I can think of a single positive aspect about BFV outside of its slide
but i liked the ability to crouch run, scale big walls, lean while moving, supress and spot people by shooting, and even having persistent markers when you needed repairs, ammo, etc
it had dedicated servers
That's more a feature/infrastructure than mechanic, but yes
the climbing is pretty good... the vaulting is not...
there's a lot of inconsistencies in that game though
something as simple as taking away the ability to pie a room harmed 2042 gameplay
with that being said, the game still has cool explosions and nice sound effects along with the visuals
"pie a room"
....... BF isn't a realistic tac shooter 
well that's a useful tactic in any FPS
ty
it prevents u from rushing into certain death
esp with the scaled down destruction, it's very easy to die to a rat whos gonna see your whole body by the time you entered even slightly through the door
usually my tactic for Pieing a room is equipping an LMG and spraying from left to right xD
OK, but if you keep slowing the movement down and taking away movement mechanics then you give that rat more power to hold a defensive position because there's no way to challenge a proactive player.
fair point
my tip is to just use a shotgun and wait in a corner for some sucker to run by xD
That's why movement exists, you play angles and make choices on whether it's best to jiggle peek, short peek, or wide swing.
Sounds like an extremely boring way to play
I do that to make people like u mad 😛
there's always angry people in the chat
its great feedback xD
playing metro over and over where it's just a power struggle is also boring way to play, but to each their own.
that map is overplayed and overrated
It doesn't make me mad, I just wonder how anyone looks at an interactive medium like video games literally designed to make off time enjoyable and proceed to want to interact with it as little as possible.
but its great for explosives when I have to play metro
It's like buying a guitar just to look at it and never play it.
no it's not because even if it's something you dont like, they're still engaging in it
If you just rat in a corner and shoot something once or twice in a ten minute span, I'd argue that isn't at all.
Just passively partaking
would you say the same for the multiple snipers on your team who tend to go 5-20 missing all their shots while not playing the obj?
Yup
yes
ngl id rather take the shotgun rat holding down an obj than a sniper shooting far away from the obj
They're effectively the same thing
no it's not, in gamemodes like conquest, rush, breakthrough, just being in the zone is detrimental to the enemy team
usually I just defend flags with an auto shotgun xD
That's not at all true, presence only matters in overwhelming numbers without any applicable skill level
BF isnt a skill based shooter anyway.... its a casual shooter
real shit
dunno when and how it became a "comp shooter"
there's no need to get sweaty and all tryhard
those are the most toxic players in chat xD
Multi-player is inherently competitive
That's not what I'm saying.
do you think bf should have a ranked mode?
I don't see why the inclusion of a ranked mode would hurt, but it would require a tailored experience all its own and I don't think they have much experience designing such aspects.
bf1 had one. Some sort of 5v5. There were even tanks there. One for each team. Never played it though. So my knowledge about it, is questionable at best. However, sucess was kinda lacking I think.
5v5 on BF, really doesnt sound like BF that much
How else would you design a competitive mode?
the argument isnt about designing a comp mode, it's that some games arent designed for a comp mode at all without taking away certain core gameplay mechanics rather than mere limitations
So you're saying that a comp mode that takes away attributes that inherently remove skill from the equation and focus on aspects that allow it to be an actual competitive mode is bad because the core experience is different?
bf doesnt need and cannot sustain a comp mode is what im saying
no need for insults, i didnt do it to you at all in this convo
TTK, no 3D spotting, movement even without sliding, damage falloff(also a part of TTK)
I never got to play the TTK changes, as they happened long after I stopped playing.
I'm sure they would have been enjoyable
The current TTK? Yeah its pretty good
I mean current TTK
It's like 100ms slower than 2042
Which is better imo
Yeah that's what I mean, I haven't played BFV basically since release
It’s pretty good still you should play it
Looks like BF6 will keep BFV damage falloff too by the looks of it, TTK looks decent
No more shooting at ants from 70 meters
I still don't care for the maps, the weapons, and the attrition system however so I don't think I'll ever reinstall it.
Play for underground 
Attrition was nerfed hard
Attrition is still an issue imo, no reason to use anything other than medic in V
Honestly I never cared for metro/underground, way too many hard chokes made for poor flow.
Honestly thats fine, I think 6 should increase recoil bcs 90% of 2042 guns have next to no recoil so they're all varying degrees of laser beams
Need we forget the RM68 being able to easily kill people from 100+m away with zero trouble when it released
Recoil with predictable patterns, spread reset that allows for bursting for range, and good damage falloff sounds like my ideal gunplay.
Yeah that seems reasonable, BF5 did it right with no spread but 2042 has some of the most midless feeling gunplay of any game ive ever played
Yeah, spread to recoil with decoupling aim from screen centre just sucked.
I have no idea how that works truthfully
It doesn't in essence lol, just random out to range
Sometimes it recoil left, sometimes right.
Essentially, there's the vertical pattern like normal guns, but then your spread equals the extreme horizontal randomness making it impossible to control the horizontal. A decoupled reticle from screen center is just that (basically if you put a dot in the center of your screen, be it sharpied or monitor crosshair, and you shoot, the reticle in games is disconnected from the static center dot that you put)
@honest cliff
Other BFs have it where bullets shoot from the center of your screen, no matter the reticle decoupling (or in BF4s case, not)
- BF1, BF3, and 2042 have center shooting bullets, but sight is decoupled from screen center because of visual recoil (BF1s case being absolutely godawful)
- BF4/Hardline has the sight glued to screen center with bullets shooting from screen center. The only time the sight decouples from center is from flinch and jump-aiming (with the jumping decoupling being able to be negated by certain order of keypresses)
Edit: spread obviously exists in these mentioned games, but they don't affect the point of where the bullets shoot from
How so?
wish I could make the server icons larger
took me by surprise literal minutes ago, jumpscared me
so cool looking
ye that's my biggest problem
way too small
even with the spacious option
easy change
we need the ability to drag out the server list so it has multiple columns
yeah easy but how big of a priority will it be
discord sucks balls with making good changes
yeah idk why they let us resize the channel list but not server list
just saw a video of this guy shooting a telephone pole and the fact that only the 50 cal went through should be added to the game
I like it. Hope they satisfy everyone and make that adjustible in size like the rest of the UI
i'm not a fan of how the bottom left status box now covers both channel and server list
It feels a bit weird but yea, overall I kinda like it
literally takes a couple seconds instead of braindead running into a room
A couple of seconds in BF is an eternity and someone has probably shot you in the back
A couple seconds on someone holding an angle and will shoot you while you try to do process of elimination at the rate of a geriatric
Or you can slice the pie on the entrance and wide swing to break point of aim and pre-aim another angle while moving into the room
Or simply throw incendiary grenade into their corner.
Really with the random angles people take you need to play fast.
Also in BF I feel like 80+% of the time I know what angle is being held and there’s zero reason to pie
Yeah almost every player just hugs the wall so its best to just break their aim and hit them while moving
And if I’m unsure… good old Zain airburst to check
Or in BFV incen or smoke it, a million better things to do than pie a room
With how many rat spots and verticality BF games have you never can fully process every single potential angle.
I literally wanted to main zain because of his airburst.
While i think it could be less powerful, the fact that the game encourages such a negative gameplay style it sure helps remind people to get off the fucking roof.
His airburst and health regen on kill 
Nah Zain is the most busted specialist
Yeah. That's good.
His health on kill is really important.
In reality it just removes the healing delay and so you heal like normal after a kill
I think that enforces positive gameplay.
How many times I’ve been at like 10 health with no med pen. Plink some random recon with the airburst
Cause it means you take risks.
And I’m back in the game
Oh for me it's just recovering from shooting some random person that shouldn't be in a specific area.
It helps being topped off after a kill too
Airburst should kill in 4 hits thougj
I think 3 is good, just enough to punish the rats but with its rof easy enough to get away from
I rarely get killed by it, I just run away as soon as I hear the first pop
Wasn’t it 2 when he first came out
Along with it have a mag in reserve lmao
Nah the airburst is way too effective
Especially since most cases in engagements you won't be full and by the time you react to the first burst you're either dead or forced to move into a position to get shot
I mainly play BT, most the time an Irish is there to prevent me from popping off too hard with it
APS existing doesn't negate the absurdity of airburst though.
In a vacuum I agree
With common counters like the aps I don’t see it being egregious
To be honest the issue with the airburst is its blast.
If it wasn't for its giant blast, damage, fire rate or even range it wouldn't be as bad to deal with in the receiving end.
The PMC from MGS4 lookin kinda familiar haha (This is a screenshot from Metal Gear 4, please do not mute me again mods)
did you get muted for posting a screenshot of a different game entirely? 
Na, but I posted another MGS4 PMC image and it got moderated, so not taking any chances. Haha

So stupid dude
Lmaoo that's hilarious
I mean, I get it
No way lmao 
I really want DICE to run an experiment, release a 1:1 remaster of BF4 but put a WW 1 or 2 skin on it and see if all the BF4 truthers maintain that attitude.
I truly believe the only thing they mean by “BF 3 or 4 feeling” is a modern setting for them.
DICE could release any version of battlefield and as long as it’s in a modern setting and works at release, they’ll eat it up
Yeah leaks reminds me of BFV more than anything tbh, even the maps
Which is fine because I love BFV 
What will be BF6's mascot?
100% and I’m excited for it.
Make it Angel to piss everyone off “Angel does it again”
I want to see ||young Angel and young Mackay|| in campaign 
Capybara
Cool
Give us the woman with the prosthetic arm from BF V as the narrator ala grandma Rose in Titanic
👆
She starts narrating with ''Hello old friend'' 
The battlefield cinematic universe goes brrrr
I want to see Mackay's Mt. Everest mission 
Respawn as Sundance for the way down
I'm looking forward to assault getting a smoke launcher.
It would be cool if they did a bf3/bf4 and allowed them to be attached to the assault rifle.
we don't know atm
All classes should be able to select smokes for their loadout imo. Makes it easier to flank and people tend to rezz more if there's smoke around.
I’d assume they can since they could in 2042
when presented with evidence about how dumb the claim about older BF being tactical and slow, they put their heads in the sand
Those ppl in the comments are silly
💀
Using the excuse that it's vouzoo
And glitches
but they'll see one clip of someone in an empty portal lobby executing the slide - jump spam perfectly and act like they'll ever see that in a real match
I hope next BF's slide is good so I can farm these players with ''CoD exploits'' 🤣
BF subreddit is pure brainrot since the beginning of the leaks
Don't worry they're still pieing the room 15 seconds later
It's been brainrot for longer than that lol
I'll admit I don't care for the way one's hitbox changed in BF4 movement tech but the movement itself is fine, people just cope.
Weird how people can only exploit movement and not stuff like aim assist.
ya the problem was never the movement, it was the janky hitboxes and the netcode before they fixed that
I remember back in the day with Gears of War 3 and the hitbox drama back then
BF4's movement exploits teleported your character model
Zouzou rouzou etc. were genuine exploits
Air strafing wasn't though, it's a thing anyone can do in gunfights
And how much of movement complaints happen now because crossplay is more or less the norm now and console potatoes realize this is what you're capable of doing with a kb/m
BF4 wasn't slow, you were just playing on a xbox 360 with a 55 FOV
Tbf, you’d nearly never see that in matches unless you’re running operation metro 24/7
The general player didn’t use fast movement tech like that
just like how gameplay in BF V and 2042 really isn't some spammy twitch shooter
the movement tech has always been there and it's not common to see someone who's mastered it
That’s fair. Imo people over exaggerate how fast 2042 is. It’s slightly easier to be fast and twitchy, but the end result is generally the same as the 3-V era except for special things like Mackey or the glide suit
I lost some brain cells
I need compensation now 
It’s also somewhat easier to find the tech masters in 2042 just because of server size. Even disregarding how it’s slightly easier to do tech in 2042, 128 players per match doubles the chance of finding them
people still play 128? 
Man screw you, now you made me want to replay the MGS all over again 🤣
I was waiting for Delta in order to replay the whole series again
These must be the same guys that I had to carry in BFV since they keep on dying every time they push an objective wasting the attacker's ticket or can't defend can't defend a objective after we just capture it...
I used to play Rush XL for LMG farming
You can get like 150-250 kills in it per match
128p cq only because there's more air vehicles to zook
Otherwise, dumbest decision ever
i only play 128cq
My cpu begs for mercy when I tried 128
My CPU on 128p gets pushed harder than on cinebench 
I'm still on a 5900x this game already maxes my CPU
5800x3d be like, "Please sir, no more. I'm tired 😭 "
Whole room turns into the sweatbox
[Insert that one gif of the burning fire extinguisher from IT Crowd]
Arctic 240mm aio running full pump and fan speed to compensate for 2042 
Yeah sounds about right
I keep my pump lower but it's an NZXT and the coil whine at higher pump speeds is grating
Honestly, the arctic is very quiet along with their fans as push and lian li fans as pull config
I use arctic fans for that reason
Hey that thing isn't being tortured!
On 2042 it is 
The only time my own 5800x3d got tortured was during bt 128 and that put my x3d to 95% usage.
I don't blame it. It usually would sit on 80 to 85% which is normal.
Me still beating the shit out of my OC’d 7700k
kind of insane how bad the reddit is compared to the discord
the people on the bottom of the leaderboard have lots of time to post on reddit because its obvious they arent playing the game
The amount of time reddit spends complaining about movement and anyone with any ability being a cheater could have made them better players than most.
Go to 7 9800 x3d
9700x will run 2042 basically the same (At half the price). It doesnt get much of a boost from the 3D cache
Oof I felt that
Playing 2042 at launch with a RX 580 and Ryzen 5 3600 was a nightmare
Damn I made the right call to get a Ryzen 7 9700x, now all I need is a new gpu (-v-
On Reddit, every gaming community is bad. If you don’t think how they think they simply attack you
Bad is an understatement tbh
Cuz discussion can actually happen here (most of the time) compared to being crucified on reddit for having opinions 
Read up on Sirlands tweets explaining the limited ammunition for vehicles.
Makes sense really
interesting way to get vehicle players to contribute
Don't wanna run out of ammo? There's more on the objective, go take or defend it
keeps up the pace of the action
I like it
Yeah, seems like a reasonable approach. Hopefully its preventing those tank snipers from camping on the edge of the map and sniping people from miles away for the entire round.
If that's the case it makes me wonder if artillery vehicles like the HIMARS will return from Battlefield 4 since they were supposed to serve that role but Tank's ended up filling that niche when they didn't return in 2042
The issue I had with bf5 is limiting your repairs and shit outside of them.
Nvm tanks feeling slow
It was a slog and encouraged defensive tanking which was.. whatever.
The guy behind it certainly thought that tanks firing shells from 100m away from each other was blockbuster gameplay.
I believe the intent of tank gameplay in BFV was to unironically invoke the movie Fury
which isn't a bad thing
but it really did fit the tank into two categories of approach, either the players scramble and don't touch the tank, or everyone touches the tank
I think planes felt the design choices working in a positive manner for them though.
Being forced to come back to resupply ammo and repairs was really good for the pacific theatre as it made sure planes stayed on their side
If tanks had way more leniency with repair and regenerated only 5 shells at a time I wouldn't hate the system
I also hope tank health doesn't regenerate in this new Battlefield
it felt dumb in 2042 and made repairing completely optional instead of mandatory for good vehicle plays during the match
I remember in Battlefield 4, games were won and lost by how good the repair plays were by vehicle players
It does to a point. Vehicles have 3 main bars of health, you can trigger a repair which will repair until the bar you are in is full but wont go to the upper bar
Its not really a passive as far as I seen but more you need to trigger it
Only on supply points or with an support with welding tool(idk if its even in it) you can repair to 100%
i believe engineers will have the repair tool this game most likely
We haven’t seen it yet so thats why I said “idk if its even in it”
not having a repair tool in a BF game is like not having a med crate/ammo crate/spawn beacon
it's a necessary piece of equipment for the class it's part of (engineer in most games or support in bf1/bfv)
and i believe static class gadgets will be coming back (like 2042 has right now). assault with medpen, engineer with torch, support with defibs, and recon with spawn beacon
so it would be 3 gadgets essentially per class
I like spawn bacon
got a ea playtest email got relly exsited turns out to be some racing game ...

not enjoyed a racing game since nfs most wantd the first one not the openworld random objective one
Anyone get this email recently?
I got playtest emails for Skate which I played then one for F1 Racing boo I want BF lol
Skate required me to use a controller which I'm horrible at I like my keyboard and mouse
I own and have played every single Battlefield game. I'm a BF Veteran
Yea I got email about play test next week
Must be nice lol
Didn't know what it was for. Need a webcam and it's only an hour
Have fun with that I don't own a webcam lol
It wasn't confirmed or anything. Just wondering if anyone else got one
I dunno if it's for bf6. But seemed like it if it's asking for a webcam to monitor the session
Dunno how a webcam will monitor the session I'd understand a instance of screen capture to monitor it to make sure your not recording gameplay lol
Dunno same reason others have broken the NDA. Ppl who do that ruin it for diehard battlefield players
I invest my money and time into the battlefield franchise
Same. Been since 1942. I'm old lol
You mean going back to BF premium isn’t the best move?
We should go back to paying for maps rather than getting gameplay content for free these days
lowkey would be nice, just because back then it was guaranteed content, but if they did it now........ i would be scared 
Issue of premium is that you won't be able to find people to play on those maps after a while 
DICE needs to up their game, 2-3 maps per season minimum instead imo
tbf with premium they gave us better development over live service it was live service that made the games seem less developed
live service is good for games like apex and mmorpg but not for fps relly because it feels less goes into it
I mean we get guaranteed content now as they sell the season passes for the entire year, just like premium promise. We can argue quantity but I think quality is about par. Since BF3 DICE really hasn’t been consistent with DLC/expac/season passes quality
And imo, the pacific update/season in BF V is the best we’ve gotten since BF3
you can't share this
The subreddit losing its mind now that a dataminer found references to a BR mode for BF6 lmao
well tbf i did like firestorm itr was more fun as a br then warzone
I personally don’t care about BRs, this isn’t an endorsement for it but it’s always funny how they cry about shit they don’t have to play
and peopel was saying about it way before because of thew fire on the consept art
Ya I always heard great things about firestorm other than the ¿$30? Price tag
Yeah, people like to reference Firestorm but forget to account for it being locked behind the base game purchase.
I don't think a F2P Battlefield BR will beat out Apex or WZ but having a f2p component isn't a bad idea honestly.
You never know, Ripple Effect might find a new wrinkle for BRs that everyone loves
I mean..... we knew it for months from leaks
Hell it was obvious that Ripple Effect was working on something like a BR when they didnt mention their work on LABS trailer
Ya I’m aware of the leaks, more making fun of the sub for losing their minds over every single piece of datamined info
Honestly, F2P Battlefield BR doesnt have to beat those games because those games are dying themselves. As for what they can do to make the game better is seperating it from core BF and thus avoidint the problems that Warzone created
Despite a lot of datamined stuff never coming to fruition
Fire storm was with bfv you never paid for it sepratly
Ya, I’m saying someone who doesn’t care about BF but interested in trying a new BR had a barrier to entry
Unlike every other BR on the market
Yea, and unironically i dont think pinging guns is bad
you mean because its not free? and its part of the game look at paid brs and free brs and compare the amount of cheaters
well, while Firestorm might have been good(i never played it) it being tied to the actual game and thus you need to buy the game to access it turned off many people
That’s an anti cheat and publisher not going after cheat sellers problem.
Plenty of free competitive games across all genres have combated cheaters more effectively than BF ever has
I hope they atleast make or use a good anti cheat and utilize it to maximum
2042 at launch was flooded with cheaters despite a full price tag
when DICE announces a kernel level anti cheat and the sub crashes out for the 7th time that week
They already use one (not a good one mind you) so BF6 will invariably use EA anticheat too.
if i get a extra few modes with a game i brought without paying extra thats a win hazard zne could of been so much better if they gave it some acual thought
Ya so just make the BR a connected but separate free experience from the base game
Warzone thrived and Blackout failed because of the same reason
No one is going to pay for a BR game
Same with Firestorm
what if the next bf comes out and it's worse then 2042, and we get a flood of videos on youtube like "2042 was SO underrated"
I was in the 2042 tech alpha
it'll probably happen after bf7
this playtest is already leagues better than that
I played the tech alpha and immediately said "ya, I'll skip launch"
watched/listened to my friends cry and moan for months, then joined during season 1 and have had fun with it despite it being what it is
i was too. i couldn't play it because the fps was AWFUL
i was playing on a 1080ti and it was like 15-20fps
I loved the physics though, launching off ladders or bhopping after falling from skyscraper height
Apparently 2042's tech alpha had like zero textures according to Jackfrags, we're already miles ahead atp
i remember 2042's closed alpha having textures
no it had textures. really rough rendering though, looked like chopped up/muddy mess
yea it was gross
That might've been what he meant, that or he misremembered
like almost a bad film grain over everything
bf games have a noise filter option i think
Either way though we're definitely way ahead already
At least by the abhorrent 2042 standards of 15 months of dev lmao
Not to mention the timing of the tests compared to a possible release of spring 26 leaves more time to continue to iron stuff out.
I think I know what you're talking about in regards to him comments. Usually in early development a lot of playtests will be in graybox environments
I see I see
was the rumor that 2042 was initially a battle royale but got hodgepodged into a shit bf true?
we'll probably never know
but that's like a game 18+ months out from launch.
but given all the things we do know, it's probably true
this game at most is ~12 months out so I'd expect playtests to be on textured (although some textures and art assets may be missing or not finalized) maps
Yeah which seems to be the case
Man I still can't believe how featureless 2042 was during the beta
You couldn't even throw grenades back 😭
still waiting for them to add fortifications 
Pleaseee I miss fortifications 🙏🙏
It will happen regardless BF6 is bad or not 
pubg was very sucsessful
that was almost a decade ago, BR marketplace has drastically changed.
its still rocking over 100k players on steam alone
lmao
pubg was also pretty much the first major battle royale, even if it was paid it was going to be popular
nowadays where you have a million free battle royales it very much matters if a new BR is paid or not
in 2018
And?
markets change
OK, but the statement isnt saying anythign about in the current market.
the point is that nobody will pay for a battle royale, which is true now. Doesn't matter if pubg was popular back then because obviously things were different
except you're trying to use it's peak player count as a counter to people won't pay for BRs anymore
Most likely true, simply because there are free alternatives
when we have the last ~5 years of evidence, along with existing BRs that were pay to play, go free to play
Shit but free BR will get more players than a quality paid BR today. Which is a shame TBH
it's like releasing a MOBA in 2025 that you have to pay $60 for because in 2004 you had to pay to play Warcraft 3 mods
or like releasing a $40 generic hero shooter because you had to pay for overwatch in 2016... oh wait
Minecraft hunger games was 🗿🗿
valid but minecraft wasn't just a battle royale
Jackfrags and Westie already have those videos made
Yeah, PUBG had two major advantages: 1) People were getting a taste of BR coming off DayZ/Epoch and therefore it was a fresh concept and 2) Being a fresh concept meant it had no competitors and could set whatever they wanted for market price
Both of those haven't applied to the genre in ages and wouldn't pass anymore.
To be fair 2042 DOES some things better than other games(at least other alive games)
Game modes are mad fun in 2042
No one cares about gunmaster or rush or frontlines in older games(except BF3 which is dead at this point), whenever they come to rotation in 2042 they are almost always fun
I miss gun game
2042 had a gun master in portal rotation this week or last week
i mean they could keep portal alive and put every battlefield game into portal including firestorm and make it a battlefield hub
bring out the bc2 and bf3 progression systems back
deffo want veitnam back
One thing I enjopy in 2042 is BT, the maps arem mid but i think BT plays decent
Portal should exist for map remakes only imo, I don't want past era soldiers or weapons or gadgets or vehicles, waste of effort imo
i think ever since they changed it from the 128 players the balance got worse probly npotbecause of the amount fo people but they did somthig to make it worse then it was
BT was my main mode since BFV tbh
bfv did it good though and grand ops was my fav game mode
Yeah same, hope it stays around in BF
atleast bfv did nto chokehold the bt maps
Yeah, flag placement was better in BFV
2042 maps are weird
You always lose first sector as a defender and last sector is almost impossible to capture as attacker
Accurate
2024 maps was rushed and had no real thought process but they removed the best flag locations liem ontop of buildings and stuff
as it should. Conquest has been ancient and stale for over 10 years now
go there to farm vehicle unlocks then go play a game mode that has some actual action.
2042 did some conquest maps better though, you aren't using 20% of the maps if you play BT in let's say Redacted
i love cq but the 128 version because i felt i could get around more and the map never seemed empty in areas
100% but there has always been bad map design for Rush/BT since BC2/BF3
BF3 rush was great, only a few meh maps
BF4 rush was god awful
i loved dropping a building on a objective and every one in it
It's for balancing reasons, if you could use ziplines in redacted as an attacker it would almost be impossible for defenders to defend, still not being able to use unique mechanics for the map is annoying
I don't like 128 modes besides Rush XL tbh, Rush XL is somewhat fun
i love it the map felt alive and you was not the only guy with aa
since the changes tothe map the players turned into cod players
diving ff the skyscrapers to wingsuit to the big stadiem was my fav thing to do to take out them roof snipers yes i mispelt it im dyslexic lol
I only play 128 because 64 on the 2042 base maps is awful. They weren't made for it

Damn, dead chat? 
anyone have a list of confirmed tanks in battlefield labs? i think i seen a leopard.
hai
Abrams and an Leopard 2
Maps need to be designed for their gamemodes, Rush in BFBC2 was the best version imo because of the maps
I was kicked for 24h 
Totally agree, and to some extent BF3 was great at doing hybrid design for Conquest and Rush.
Note to myself: I cannot insult Reddit users on this discord 

we'd prefer if you didn't insult anybody.
Of course! I just want the game to be good, so I got heated by all the arguments on Reddit regarding movement and other things. I'll just take a Deep breath, try to ignore them and hope the devs know what they are doing.
DISCLAIMER: dear mods, if this topic is not allowed, feel free to delete the post. 🙂
Anyone else feel uneasy with Temporyal? Like I understand in BFV when there was content drought it kept some hype alive for the game.
However, I feel it just ruined the entire surprise for the next game. That feeling of discovery when you first play a game, discover the Weapons, the maps, the progression, etc. I feel is one of the most fun part when a New game is released.
Now, we already know so Much, It's like part of my hype is already dying (not that the content doesn't seem great, just that I have nothing to look for anymore)
If i had to make a public comment myself. I think he just simplu ripped the bandaid off.
I don't think he's particularly problematic but I think the larger issue is that the battlefield community are a bunch of idiots that shouldn't be trusted with pre release content.
I think he does it out of curiousity than malice.
Hes already stated that he's just doing it again out of nostalgia
I doubt he's going to continue for long
I mean, There is no need to continue for long when you already released everything in 24h 
Replied 1/10 rage bait
(talk about not insulting anybody...)
Don't look search the leaks if you don't want to be spoiled 
Movelet detected = opinion rejected
Well, a bit difficult when it's the first post I saw when opening Reddit today 
This, block him on twitter etc. pretty easy to not be spoiled imo
He’s not wrong
I’ve played WoW for 20 years, that community is a bunch of scholars in comparison to your average “baTtLeFIeld VEt”
If you asked them to describe BF2/3/4 you’d think they were playing SOCOM
Like way said, the issue is less them, and moreso the army of brainlets who treat everything they post as gospel.
I also don't like to see mined leaks pre release, so I muted their account on X and reddit.
you sound goofy
Battlefield sub-reddit lives in a black and white world. You're either told to play Arma, or to play COD
Both equally as obnoxious
This is the way
Fair enough opining. No need for insulting is my point.
I would say that all subreddits and full of black and white type of people
Yeah, it's annoying
I do wonder how many "Team Movement" people play Locker/Metro/Underground primarily
Reddit is just dumb
Locker is Battlefield's COD
BF3 CQ dlc is battlefield’s cod
The people who play locker all the time are the BF equivalent of people who only play Shipment on CoD
And it was ironically one of the best dlc we’ve gotten
Not even a goober?
I'm on Team "Not BF1 movement"
I play different modes 
Give me BFV or 2042 movement and that's all that's needed
CQ dlc does look good i just wish BF3 was on modern gen consoles w 64 players
I don't really want BF2042 movement, but I don't know how influential the animations are on my perception
Maybe if they weren't so robot-ish, I would like it more
I think BFV movement was fine but for the love of god people who slide should lose momentum like in BF1
Either way, I played a lot of BF3 through 2042 and movement was NEVER my complaint
BFV you could slide up surfaces
That's not what I mean
But besides that the movement was peak
I'm talking visual impression
Was fun af
Also, BF2042 was faster for other reasons than movement
True
Although it’s not as fun as you watch a Misaki sliding up the stairs on Operation Underground with a ZK-383
the nightmares
Part of the game when I do it back lol
Fair enough
No it was really fast bcs you have to cover more ground on the bigass maps
Combine that with slide jumping and everything being zero recoil and that is certainly some game design
One day people will realize FOV sliders are a thing that can dramatically change how fast something looks
I meant that other things ALSO had an impact
People saying b3/4 were slow need to be sat down on a pc with a fov > 90
Probably comes from people that didn't play much Locker/Metro
Whats console FoV usually set at on older BF titles
On the more open maps you didn't really perceive the speed that much
Like 55-65 can’t remember the exact number but it’s loooow
Damn i thought it was like 70
Just a little vid on the perception speed in relation to FOV, both runnung at sprint speed in Battlefield V is 6.035 m/s :)
Some other content you may enjoy:
2042 Future Frame Rendering: https://youtu.be/cNoSNbED73U
HOVERCRAFT DESTRUCTION, How to: https://youtu.be/CzeFAB7nLdI
Goodbye BFV, 113-16 HAND CAM: https://youtu.be/dkMwb39Q80M
HOW to I...
Idea for the devs on next playtest. Limit fov to 75 and see community say ye fixed the game by reducing movement speed. 😛
literally what @winter viper said on twitter a couple days ago 
but please don't limit me to 75 lol, 95 is the sweet spot
I'm just saying to do this as a smoke test for those watching/playing 
limit console to 75 
since i've noticed a trench with "slow movement enjoyers" and console users being the same 
Would be funny if they just changed animation speed in a test
Me
👆 🤣
Then your opinion is not that much better than the one of a "movelet", tbh
24/7 Lockers enjoyers play the game to try their hardest
You won't even find people who uses movement in other modes 🤷
I more so meant that Locker players care about movement much more, because that's the most there's to it (Locker)
and aiming, but I think you get me
Yeah I get you
That and they think zouzou vouzou is fake and not real
It’s the place where the benefits of it are most evident
But also proves that in open spaces it isn’t the be all end all that determines a fight
Bf is and always will be positioning first. Movement can totally be designed like it is in 2042 to be pros and cons
CQC players are just better at the game, if I'm going 40-20 in a Close Quarters playlist then I'm going 40-10 in let's say Domination or Frontlines, despite Domination or Frontlines being equally fast paced
I usually forget jumpshots exists in 2042 until I play Redacted, then every 2 person is jumpshotting
Or crouch spamming
Battlefield is primarily combined arms, not CQC so
Saying the movement should be catered either to the casuals or to the people that try their best is unfair
they should implement drop shotting and wall bounces 
No BF catered to only one of these groups except for BF1
Assuming my PC can fucking run the game, I can equally enjoy BF1 and BF2042
Even in BF3 every 2 soldier was jumping around
Best BF games always had easy to learn hard to master movement
What I'm trying to get at is, I've seen the tryhards (not in a banter way) think that their opinion is the only opinion
Ultimately what I don't want, is for the game to allow for EVERYONE to play like a cracked up squirrel
Movement needs to be a mastery
That’s how it’s always been tho. You can log into BF3/4/1/V/2042, go into either a cqc or a standard conquest map and see a few people take advantage of the movement to varying degrees, then there are the people who don’t take any advantage of it and play like bots from 1942
This is true and not an opinion.
Good players want what's good for the genre, casuals want what's good for them.
Everyone has always been allowed, PC at least, but few whether it’s through lack of knowledge, can do or desire to, don’t engage with the movement like that
And it’s always has what made BF a chill/more casual game rather than a SBMM sweat fest
I've found the movement in BF2042 to be easier
Going 40-10 is fun af and is much easier to do when you have like 12 people per team that do not have thumbs/wrists
I could say that tryhards want mechanics that further allow them to take advantage of the movement
And not want it for "the good of the game"
But I agree to some extent
I’d agree with that, I still rarely see more than a few people per server utilizing it
Yeah I’m in the same boat, I just prefer there being a little bit.
I can enjoy games that take the ‘who sees who first’ approach, but having a little bit there at least to promote some one v ones so it actually feels like a fight is good
Yeah, I have to admit that BF1 isn't the most engaging of games movement wise
But the overall state of the game "compensates" for it
It's not engaging in anything besides visuals and art direction
Its class balance and how different they each feel is what lifts it up to me
I'm so sorry to hear that
You're so full of yourself...
Gunfights are easy, never really challenges you at all, but making the core decisionmaking around how to best position to play to your class benefits is fun itself
I said I also enjoy BF2042
I can be engaged without having to put in effort
I can be engaged whilst putting in effort
Goes both ways
BF4 I uuuused to enjoy, not anymore since I dislike the maps and I didn't actively play the game since 2013
Imo it’s more tactically engaging
Like, you have to more actively think about your positioning because it’s hard to get out of a position in a pinch
I’ve always wondered. Is BF1 truly that much more immersive than 5? Or is it the lack of gameplay depth that has focus much more on the atmosphere of the game in comparison to V where there’s just much more to concentrate on gameplay wise
Because I, personally, have never had a lack of immersion while playing V
BF V would be more immersive it focused on the bigger battles
It’s mostly the tonal consistency and tone in general. Darker tones tend to get people more interested due and involved because it’s easier to relate to the narrative
Yeah, you can feel whatever
BF1 just has good attention to minute detail and art direction. It's why BF2042 looks so bad because the super clean aesthetic is antithetical to the lore and setting.
Imo V’s hud hurts its immersion much more than people think
It feels really mobile-esc
V's hud isn't that bad, is it?
Ya I’d agree, BFV never making it around to the truly iconic WW2 moments hurt it
Look at Arrras, for example...
Game had so much more life in it
Beautiful map, but lacks any sign of a war going on
If more maps were like Devastation, then maybe the atmosphere would be better
The lower right of the hud is really what hurts it
Having gun icons with numbers acting like we don’t know what buttons to hit when we want primary is a really bad choice for immersion
IMO I like when the maps start off “clean” then by the end it’s ravaged
It also clutters the screen way more than the simple ammo indicator we used to have
Considering that 4, 1, v and 2042 all do it I never considered it a bad thing
I care very little about hud, unless it actively hurts my experience
Man playing on an UW monitor, stuff like that on the edges of my screen really never bothered me.
As long as the info I need is there when I want it, I’m good
I didn't particularly notice 2042's hud either, but it wasn't good in retrospect
4 nor 1 had it. They had an ammo indicator and that’s it
Extra numbers/icons next to the ammo counter have never bothered me
4 had the number next to the gadget it corresponded to, 1 does the same thing v does
Yup, screenshots exist of it
What bothers me more is the overlay of icons/flags/sectors etc in the middle of my screen that block my sight on enemy players
Which I felt 2042 was really bad with
And then 2042 also had the key icons next to the gadget
They aren’t all that different in that regard
The customisability of those icons could be different though, I never bothered nor cared to see if I could turn off the keys on the Ui
HUD customization is all it takes to satisfy all of us 
To be honest, you'll never satisfy everyone in the BF community
So I take it back
Maybe in a customized version, but not by default. By default, 1 just had the ammo counters while V had the weird boxes above it with gun indicators
“DICE added HUD customization and this is how it ruined my immersion, a story in two parts”
Ah I think I see what you mean. The gadget list for v stays on permanently but the bf1 one only does when you select or replenish a gadget, so you don’t see the key at all times
That’s fair. They really could’ve been toned down or just relegated to the compass
100%, have them overlayed when you spawn in as an orientation tool then within ~3 seconds have them relegated to the compass
Fr. That’s why I’m fine with the way labs is doing stuff like flag borders.
As long as I can turn it off, I’m good with it
Also, I assume the themes/OSTs aren't finished for the game?
Agreed
I think a mix of "active warzone" and "clean" maps would be good
Especially for civilian areas, seeing a neighborhood or downtown area turned to complete rubble is part of Battlefield's aesthetic
This right here is 100% truth
One of the worst things is having casual players make the worst choices. Which makes no sense why anyone would listen to them as they'll play the game maybe 100hrs and move on to the next
But it also seems like the players that spent 2-3k hrs playing and buying all the cosmetics, and battlepasses etc get ignored when we ask "Hey, could you do something please about not allowing enemy or friendly tanks to just sit in spawn"
Vehicle attrition, Irish APS not stopping rockets, etc. So unless that was an off hand choice of request, it was adjusted for based on feedback
Listening to sweats isn't the way either. It needs to be a balance
i think bf6 tanks need to be like bfv tanks they felt more engageing
nah, fuck the goddamn glancing blow shit
Take the Wildcat for example from 2042, people (casual player base) begged for the range to be extended on the AA rockets and that air craft was too hard to kill. Now we have Wildcats that can lock on up to 800m away, then they gave it APS, after making Irishs APS not stop rockets lol, then taking away Assault class 3rd C5 made it even harder to stop them from camping and harassing or farming kills
APS should have only been on the armoured car from season2
And then lol, because the Wildcat campers were mad on Reddit and complained, they gave the AT mine a 2 second delay before it armed because people like me would fly over head and drop them on top the tank and kill it
Feedback is fine, but my god listening to most of the brain dead people on Reddit is not the choice lol
Thats exceptionally dumb, the AT mines in 2042 were probably the most balanced in BF history imo bcs they were quick acting
On the same hand, I’ve heard people like Jackfrags and other streamers make some straight up brain dead suggestions
Jacks about as casual as they come too
Most of the YTs that put out videos about these games now barely spend more than a hour or two a week at most to make a video to push out

Yeah cause they worked, but now if you try to throw mines down, might as well Alt F4
i mean the way they drive and was controlled but i think 3rd person should be removed
Are you telling me people like xfactor who hasn’t really played since BF 4/1 doesn’t have valid opinions on 5/2042? (He doesn’t he just cries like randos on the sub for BF4 remake)
Nah vehicle 3rd person makes sense
na not a chance 3rd person is a cancer
Yeah if he hasnt played since those games his criticisms have a lot less validity in most peoples eyes
Been around the BF community since BF3 and never heard of this guy until like 3 weeks ago
Xfactor slander?
i love this
Cuz he’s an absolute nobody. Just played with levelcap and matimio back in the day
And people think he knows what he’s talking about cuz he played with them
I heard he was a repair/tank main player during BF4 comp games, and that's about it
Tank gunner*
Also i think people who are too competitive like Enders should just be ignored because in his case just plays BF5 medic and rarely ever teamplays, he also complains far too much
I agree
i disagree
Enders has valid points, even if they aren't worded...... the best way sometimes
Enders has a LOT of very very valid points 90% of the time
I am a little biased bcs i argued with him once on this discord (he was fairly hostile tbh)
Lol
Until I play a game with Enders where he's not consistently trying to dodge being on the losing team and getting rolled, but keep getting put onto that losing team. I ain't listening
I don't blame on that half the time. Sometimes it's just better to quit and Re-Q when teammates are playing like Reddit users
Honestly a more sensible comp/pro type of creator is Maxiq. Hes a better creator and far less argessively competitive than Enders in game and he makes more competent arguments on average
Also I once killed him on stream in BF1 with one of the worst guns in the game. Probably one of my best moments on BF ever.
Maxiq is cool, and a homie. Known him a LONG time
Enders and his type is the reason why social media is a cesspool.
What are some of Enders big opinions again? its been a while since ive watched his vids
Going to laugh like hell when he shows up and reads this stuff
Oh dw i think he got banned 
he's still here 
I savaged him on Twitter straight off to him. Didn't say a word back.
Hes watching lol
Whats his discord name
- against visual recoil
- wants gunplay to be more like BF4 but updated
- doesn't want BF1 movement, but also doesn't want excessive titanfall movement
- vehicles, i don't really know detailed opinions other than says BF4 had the best balance of them
- wants maps like BF3
Visual recoil, recoil and spread tbh
@naive fractal 
Wasnt showing him
BF4 vehicles being balanced... lmaoooo
also BF4 gunplay is the most overrated slop that gets praised. Being required to burst because guns have the bullet spread of a hose with your finger over it isn't good design
"bf4 gunplay but updated"
not just copy pasted
updating refers that you're building off a foundation that I vehemently disagree with
BF1 and 2042 have the worst gunplay tbh
Visual recoil kinda makes sense
BF4 gunplay update doesnt sound too bad, honestly I guess hardline gunplay is better slightly but ive not played it
BF1 movement is mid i wont lie. Honestly watching his streams, i doubt he actually dislikes the idea of titanfall movement considering how much he slides in BF5.
BF4 vehicles are NOT balanced at all wtf is he on
Never played BF3 but its maps do look top tier
BFV right under that with random recoil crap
wait, he said something about vehicles in this chat a couple days ago, let me see if i can find it
give me random recoil slop over random bullet deviation
I can tame that bucking horse
Idk BF4 vehicles felt more balanced than 2042 lol.
Wat
nah, random recoil is dumb af 
normal recoil pattern and spread are leagues ahead of that shit
it's also called spread*
they wanted your opinions on what's required to have BF be a good game
Oh another unsolicited Enders shit talking session ah yes
oh
For the record, I wasn't...js
same, i said that his feedback are valid and shouldn't be ignored
edit: i meanth feedback lol
Why would I willingly subject myself to a situation that isn’t enjoyable? It’s a Battlefield pub lobby. I can sit through it just fine, but I won’t lol. Much easier to find a new game.
My experience is heavily dependent on 31 random players. Even if I’m consistently performing the best on my team I’m still 1 person
Besides, you questioning why I leave is funny considering I’ve experienced much more pressure competing with my team in tournaments for significant money. Games that really matter
In 2042 I’m not sitting there and suffering cause of bad balance
The game is annoying enough already
Cuz you would always just end back up in the same server cuz you wouldn't let the matchmaking breathe for 5 seconds and would eventually finish the game in that said rolled team.

don't put yourself out there subject to criticism then.
what goes around comes around.
Enders yesterday: This discord is chill
The discord today: Hey, why aren't we shitting on Enders because we don't like him

Don’t care, I’m here talking to you guys aren’t I? No stranger to this
Yeah sometimes there arent many servers so I just decide to tank it anyways
we segmented into talking about how streamers often have just as garbage takes as your typical reddit randos
someone brought up enders
here we are
Well seeing as streamers are usually good players ofc they would
Better then avg players so
Usually*
I did, my apologies guys
sure. great. welcome and can be a pleasure. my point is: once one is out there with public broadcasts, don't expect everyone to agree with you.
I don’t
Actually it started with the conversation of who's opinions hold more validity when making game decisions for the better: the casual player that will spend 100hrs or less playing, or the creator that will spend 2-3k hrs playing etc
Feel better about it than BFV or 2042. Hope for the best lol.
From the 50+ minutes of leaks I've seen it looks peak
👍
So far
preorder right now, no balls
$70 in an undisclosed envelope to Stockholm, today
Well I can't go in time to when pre orders are up💀
nah dude there are ways, trust
What takes of mine started this again? Lol
"b But dOnT pRe OrDeR!!🤓"
if you want to climb up the chain, start here
I can do with my money as I want
I'm pre ordering the Super Delux Maximum UwU Hardcore Milsim edition
🗿
I'm not against it, I personally just wait until a week before release etc
dgaf about collectors editions, just give me the base game with the first year of season pass etc
BFV forces you to play as a medic
Why?
Attrition
Attrition was designed to hinder good players 💯
Only medic can have 100% hp all the time
Whats attrition?
If its good its good and ill have fun playing it
If its not good i'll play something else like Helldivers
Simple as 
You don't refill 100% of your health, you only refill 40%
Some unfun system in BFV that prevented health regen / limited ammo
That's dumb
Game will be locked at 50 FOV (Console BF4 style) an the running speed of a snail, guns recoil will require a larger desk to pull down on mouse hard enough to control the recoil
Imo was just purely unfun, but funnily enough it never affected most players because they’d die before it set in
Lets calm down there bud
