#battlefield-labs-discussion
1 messages · Page 51 of 1
Fair enough. I'm a pc gamer though. And at this point, anything is better than 2042 I feel
Fine, candy crush is worse 😁
I'd play more BF4, if it weren't for the thousands of cheaters. Last real "good" BF game. Here's hoping the next one can recapture some of that
cheaters?
i have not met a cheater on BF4 since it's all community servers
Sweats, yes. Attack Heli skyboxers, the worst. Cheaters, no
bf4 is still active and still good nad bf3 also active for few server and rush in both is amazing bfv for tank and jet bf1 cinema but i don t like play bf1 all time too old war
bf2042 is not good and not bad fast wea is old seems old bf some new wea only and server lag
Wishing bad company 2 servers were still running on consoles rn 
I hope the next game is good
I really, really wish people would stop stating the obvious.
Huh?
But, I Believe the people at DICE is worker hard to give us an amazing game
what they mean is:
"We all want the next BF to be good, so why state that obvious fact"
This discord has a tendancy for noobs to just say something the community already knows
Ok
This server is full of people stating and asking the obvious xD
Some people lack a brain.
In perfect honesty a lot of people in here do, a lot of the time noobs are really clueless or speak really bad english so its hard to tell what theyre getting at
Pretty quiet in my inbox...
EA, did the pigeon delivering my invite got struck by Lightning or something? 
mine is missing a few brain cells, so it went to different inbox 

There is no getting in and playing also, you get accepted and you playtest for a few hours at a time selected by them
well yeah, that i know lol
i just wanna test and give feedback on it
I know you do, but it seems like somethign a lot arent aware of 😄
I wanna see how keen the devs are to reply in the private discord
Has there been any discussion on performance? Or is it too early to be meaningful
What do you think the rec specs will be
we don't know, but min specs for at least the labs stuff is in the pinned posts
Labs already has a recommended spec
For those who are lazy
PC Minimum Specs:
CPU: Intel Core i5-8400 / AMD Ryzen 5 2600
GPU: Nvidia RTX 2060 / AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB
Memory: 16GB
Storage: Minimum 30GB
PC Recommended Specs:
CPU: Intel Core i7-10700 / AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
GPU: Nvidia RTX 3060Ti / AMD Radeon RX 6700-XT
Memory: 16GB
Storage: Minimum 30GB
2060 is 7 years old now....
they can't keep making new games where min specs are a 660ti or 760 😭
Lol yeah I was like they’re finally targeting new gen now
it's like still having games released on the ps4 when it should have been dropped years ago lol
Or should I say current gen
it's tough
new cards are expensive and hard to get so loads of people are on 7+ year old hardware, but games are also more demanding
some people just gotta realise they won't be able to play the latest games at some point
yup
the used marketplace for GPUs is pretty decent if you know how to look and do simple tests on GPUs to make sure they're working properly
i bought a 3090 for 670usd used that way, but since swapped it out cuz it was having issues running 2042 (and only 2042) on drivers newer than a certain date. every other game worked great
Yea, probably because the Labs builds are not properly optimized
a 2060 minimum would imply they are fairly optimised, that's not a very powerful card
wow i don't even want to know how that went
yea, but again i assume its safe to assume that the builds are not properly optimized due to them being early indev builds
that was also 3.5 years ago now 
a one generation jump from 1050ti to 2060 is not that much (20 series wasn't even that big of a jump performance wise from 10 series)
yeah of course, not as optimised as they could be
Performance talk is irrelivant at this point.
i don't think i've actually seen any pc footage at all, unless everyone was forced to use controller
it's either console, or PC using controller
there was one clip that showed nvidia shadowplay being turned on
real
eww, cringe af

As per BFBulletin on X, invites have been sent.
Well, guess I'll stay in the watching chair for now 😂
I assume people used controllers to use Aim assist so they wont try to properly aim
i'll go into hibernation until my pigeon comes in
I haven't found anything on North Americans getting invites
..... even with controller the gameplay was..... rough to say the least
ngl pc players being forced to use controller would explain how bad some players are
because they SUCK
i know i can't play fps games for shit on controller
At least yours is still somewhere, my pigeon is dead somewhere 😂
i didn't wanna straight out say it 
yeah, mine will show up when open beta begins 
It’s not that hard, u just gotta get comfortable with aiming with your strafe
When I tried cod on roller I used the right stick too much at first
i'm sure i'd do fine if i play it for a while, but suddenly having to switch from keyboard to controller does explain the poor aim
will the ext game even have jets
no they've removed all aerial vehicles from battlefield
I mean, maybe it isnt hard but when using a K&M is hardwired to my brain for years and is a involuntary action i cannot switch to controller
you'll have to wait for bf7 i'm afraid
ok thanks for info
if you didnt notice, Kato was joking
i know
but bad company didnt have jets
Well I tried it too see both sides of the debate cuz I’m a kbm main too
And yeah it’s strong as fuck in cod
probably bigger maps would have jets or helis
Oh i do agree it is strong as fuck on COD, but its just..... not possible for me
Fairs, I didn’t switch bc I find kbm more fun
nor did they have proning ^^
Or strafing left/right.
it's a 6 year-old card! 

They better get the plane balance right in the next game
I'm playing a lot of BFV recently and good grief is the plane vs plane and plane vs infantry bad
i keep getting application errors when trying to login to playtest website 😢
give it a couple of days and wait for instructions?
Forget about Bf6, when does Bf7 release y'all?
FY26.
My bad typo lmao
Im to stressed out i did something wrong.. but i guess ill wait
congratulations, by the way. 👍
Thanks im very happy to be a part of it! Especially since i played all bf ever made...
enjoy plenty.
And test as much as possible.
Trying out different things.
Kbm and controller support for labs?
Lucky bot
Boy*
Well obviously I hope you're not a bot
And decent at the game please
Wow you got lucky, please use your veteran experience and give them feedback, its very important
mods please ban anyone who mentions they are in the labs test
cause it'll make me feel sad I didn't get in 😫



Im very decent at the game, im in the SCAM clan you might have seen them and thanks im very lucky indeed
I should’ve gotten an invite
Thanks i just must have patience hahaa
I guess we have to. U going for EU?
lucky you!
cries in the corner
😭
damn leaks
Ye i must since i live in the netherlanda
Brother feel Bad Now. But dont be sad. Maybe someone will not arrive and they will need some extra ppl.
See u there then 🫡
See you on the battlefield bro!
I hope they have a decent amount of guns when the game is finished. Woould love to see the L85 make its return
Please give actual good feedback to the devs that’s all I’m asking
L85 would be cool. Yeah.
Oh trust me i will bro
I hope they make it the L85A3
Ive been fed up with 2042 how they did it etc, would love to havr some BFBC1/2 And bf3 and 4 gameplay/gunplay movement
Destruction etc
A2 or A3 are both cool weapons.
Ooooh I would love that. Bf3 and 4 gunplay. With New engine and graphics more like bfv and it would be awesome
Yeah but with the sound design of bad company, but then remasterd in the best possible way
we do not talk about A1
Give us an AUG A3 or a Steyr A2 also. Irish army needs representation
Now u put crown on it. That would be best version
So trust me this playtest and feedback gonna be wild
I hope so
I would take some shots at the A1, But I was using an A1 to shoot and it jammed. 🤣
Just give an L85a2 with holograpic, folding grip and a muzzle brake with extended mags. Unstoppable

L86 also pretty decent tho
DICE if you can hear me please may I have a C7 with ELCAN optic ill love you forever
Make M24 Great Again
Only part of the premium battlepass of the battlepass of the battlepass 
Bf2042 desperately lacks sniper rifles. I hope the selection will be a bit more fluffy in the next one.
We need atleast 15 sniper rifles at launch
15?!
That’s not asking for much
5-10 is enough imo
that is asking for too much and if there are 15 they're going to feel nigh identical
I mean I always use the same snipers even in a long list on bf1
cause some are just better than the other
L111, M24, Gol Magnum, Sv98, M40a5, JNG90...
Even with fancy perks and vastly different stats 15 snipers is unnessecary
Let me ask you how many sniper rifles launched with 2042?
i cant remember but for sure not 5-10
How many snipers are in BF4 again? Less than 15 im sure
Only 2 + 1 anti material
bruh
BF4 launched with 70-80 weapons
we had 3, thats not enough. We have i think 5 now, which isnt enough again. But 15 is too much
I mean, 15 is too much, but only 2 was too little
We got 14 snipers not including the AMRs throughout BF4, the semi auto doesnt really count so basically 13
And most are really similar to each other
I would rather 15 than 2…
we all would
Five weapons per class are enough, IMO.
but 15 are a lot
BF4 launched with 80 weapons
way too many.
In medio stat virtus
nahhhhhh
well, notice that in every class you'll have one or two metas.
So you rather 22 weapons at launch than 80 weapons at launch?
if there's no opportunity cost, sure give us 80.
the problem is if they focus on that many weapons and neglect the rest.
Just because theres a meta doesnt mean you should only have the weapons that work in it
They have DICE entirely focusing only on the multiplayer so i don’t see an issue.
True. But there is a point below which it just is useless to have it.
sorry forgot to tag you.
Depends if we're going back to a BF3/BF4 kinda customisation. In 2042 you can turn your M5 into an smg or a dmr. With that no need for an extended list of firearms.
I sure want to share your optimism, of course.
If guns have a unique identity again, then we need more.
and it was bs tbh
Ok 80 weapons is too much as newer CoD games have arguably proved, but 22 is too damn little.
They have to be well balanced, but also distinct. As much as I love BF4, a lot of the weapons feel quite samey
That’s just wrong
I have always held that the big differentiators in weapons should be dispersion and recoil.
against accuracy and RoF.
I’m glad there is spread but I don’t want any excessive spread.
Tbh doesn't really matter if we have a big selection and some feel the same. Then you can just pick your favourite and everybody's happy. Your Austrian? Pick the Aug, your french? pick the FAMAS...
british? the knife
British? I'll take your land!
British? Food without seasoning xD
British? Jacket Potato with Beans and Tuna
That's funny because chicken Tika masala is one of their favorite dishes
Along with curry
That's what happens when you conquer half the world
From what I've seen it's most likely 4. Sight/Siderail/grip/barrel
I would assume we'll see mag/muzzle mods too
Unless I'm misunderstanding what you're referring to by only saying four
Can't believe battlefield labs was ruined from leaks, was really wanting to try and play
you can still get invited
How do you do that

how did the leaks 'ruin' it
"ruined"?
Yeah, God dammit. The community is even happier about the direction of the new game now!!
The leaks ruined everything!!! 😏
maybe they think labs shut down because of leaks or something lmao
Labs shut down, EA not doing anymore battlefield
Shot down in its prime.
RIP Battlefield Labs. 2025-2025 ♥️
Kek
It wasn't ruined at all. If anything it was good as it creates hype, and there's more feedback then before now.
Please explain how it's ruined
Can you blame them after 2042? The bar is so low rn 😭
anyways, I'm hyped for the upcoming Mirror's Edge Labs they announced 
Honestly if there are things a Battlefield title needs to have is: Large scale maps, variety of Ground, Arial and Naval combat vehicles, huge player count 32v32 or higher (if possible) Variety of weapons to choose and the most important features destructible Environments, oh and not be treated like a game show (The Finals!!!!)
Another mirrors edge?
Would be nice if they remastered the first one so I could play it on ultrawide
Not ruined, but leaking footage, I mean you signed an agreement that the Alpha was to be not recorded, I read the agreement
Some people obviously can't read
@stiff storm facts
We all did but some people don’t care
Man
Someone DDos'ing Hardline servers is cringe af 
But when the agreement was broken, the Alpha was put on hold, I've looked in the playtest and they took it down. Would've been nice to try it and play from a personal perspective
Its impossible for it mot to be leaked. Heck you are practically begging to have it leaked if you have people other then devs play the game
No they didn't
Who told you this info
Whats your source
Emails, tikytoks
Ok how do you know tiktok are true
They aren't from devs
You just trust what they say?
I don't know
Unless it's said from a dev you can't 100% believe it
Plus the first test was 2 hours I'm pretty sure
Yes, as they all will be for a while. Short, focused play sessions.
Yes
Whats the point of shutting down a 2 hour playstest when it's already so short lol
They wouldn't shut it down becuase of leaks
Leaks was bound to happen
Its inevitable
It’s gonna happen again
Yes
It’s all for marketing
I know I would also love to help to improve Battlefield, and I hated that there those who would ruined this, just because they are desperate for attention
Let’s hope they can make a good Battlefield game for once in 8 years but it’s kinda of impossible for them 😭
Yeah, they built a playtesting system entirely for marketing.
Instead of doing actual marketing, they decided to build a multi-million playtest system...in the hopes that a dozen 360p videos will fix the franchise. Its genius when you think about it
I was very positive for the last 2 games and looked how those came out…
I mean the only bad battlefield game is 2042
Hardline, 1, V were good. Ofc 1 being better then the 2
Hardline was underrated
Someone doesn’t remember they early years of BFV
I loved that one personally but that's subjective
Almost as if most of the battlefield games had a bad launch for different reasons
Purely Objectively speaking V isn't bad
2042 shouldn’t even be considered as a battlefield title
True
Yes I do know that, I’ve been playing Battlefield since BF3 (technically Bad Company 2)
That’s why im cautiously optimistic
I agree
From what I've seen it looks like we are back
They just gotta be consistent with it now
although the only one I don’t know because I played on the PS3, is BF3, apparently I was reading some comments that BF3 had a terrible launch day?
How bad was it
🤷🏻♂️
large scale maps? no thanks. walking simulators they are.
sure. but it hardly ruined the game or its development.
labs playtests are ongoing.
Sure, but at the same time we could've guessed, or waited till closed/open beta
i have not got one but still waiting xd
You know when I say Large Scale Maps I wasn’t just referring to open fields map like Hourglass in BF2042 or PanzerStorm in BFV, you know there can be large scale urban maps too, which I believe has never been has never been done before
Maps like Sharqi Peninsula & Gulf of Oman please
I mean a urban map that is the size of manhattan
I don’t know, I’ve thinking a lot of the opening missions Battle for New York from MW3 (2011)
This map, but updated to a modern Frostbite would be awesome
RAW/UNCUT
#sharqibf3 #sharqipeninsula #bf3backtokarkand
oh I see. I'm all for Grand Bazaar large scale.
Grand Bazaar is a small map
But what if it could be bigger?
exactly. Make it bigger.
Does it need to be bigger?
except it wasn't.
could be fun.
Map has good pacing for 64p.
definitely.
Bigger for the sake of big, bad choices dont for no reason other than "Because we can".
Small and large maps are fine to have. It doesnt have to be some emalgomous mess of both
2042's maps were just bad because one they were rushed on the 128p basis.
Know what we need?
Museum remake
And two because well. They're just bad.
We were close with Hourglass, but they just had to include that 95% of sand (><;
128 player maps are the problem.
All versions of Hourglass are bad
The engagements and the volume just makes 128p and the maps made around it unfun.
Play the maps on 64p and they're boring as all shit.
Bigger map doesn't mean necessarily mean better if you're increasing the size for the sake of it.
That's what I'm trying to get at.
true.
You can artificially increase the size of the maps by using game modes to change the route and utilise unique sections of the map.
Like damavand, metro, etc.
absolutely.
Battlefield labs map is God tier
i personally like the size of grand bazaar, op. underground/metro, redacted.
among others.
We've seen snippets of it
It ain't a tier until more people play it lol
I've seen 45+ minutes of leaks of it
So
I think the bigger you make the map you more linear you need to make sections of it to make sure people don't wander to unnecessary parts.
Wake island is a perfect "large" map with tonnes of room everywhere for vehicles and infantry.
!
Have you played it tho 
Otherwise, rating it is pointless lol
Honestly I miss when there was parts of the maps that were only in certain modes like Rush and Breakthrough, which on a side note, they need to bring back 32v32 Rush, Breakthrough out stayed it’s welcome, and Rush XL was just bad in general
Breakthrough is really good.
Not gonna lie I prefer it more over rush but rush does have its place.
I can understand the annoyance cause it feels like rush has been sidelined.
No but you don't have to play something to determine if it's good
You kinda have to understand how the game feels.
You can make a snap judgement which is valid but to get a full proper judgement you need to play the game.
Though ultimately it is just shooting people. 
I'm on the same sentiment though cause the pacing and shit looks good.
I've noticed a few accessibility things too
Yes but it has been taking the spot of Rush, I understand when they introduce it in BF1, but by BFV it should have been a part of Battlefield Staple modes not a replacement of one for the other
Any Rush + Frontlines
Tho preferably, cq be swapped for hotwire would be quite a 🐐'd move by Dice
Rush has been getting the short end of the stick of support, and I miss 32v32 rush
Personally, anything over 16v16 rush is a bigger cluster than it needs to be
If there's one good thing 2042 has done to me it's made me pay closer attention to how you can encourage better player behaviour.
How do you not do it how do you do it
I feel like 24v24 isn't a bad number.
Never played it at that number, was always 16v16 ir 32v32
It's because the point is a single object rather than an area/objective like bt
I would have killed to play it on 32v32.
Yeah
64v64 frontlines would be so fucking cancer.
Rush is good at 24v24. But it's best when the maps are properly made for it.
That sounds like something the mods should delete 
I can accept when a map is being pushed to the edge of the limits versus broken limits.
I think BF4 was the last time I played 32v32 Rush, it could have also been a community made server
Yeah they'd get you on anything.
I meant that as a joke about removing that so the 128 crowd doesn't see it 
No more old gen is going to push the game to more then it's ever been
OH PFFT
Those people who love 128 are...... Something for sure.
Honestly I would be okay with 50v50 Conquest, it work well with hell let loose and Squad
128 was a crappy gimmick that killed the development cycle of the game.
32v32 is dices bread and butter. They should keep to it.
Give me carrier assault.
Give me titan assault.
I'll sell my soul for either of those modes.
Hotwire, Capture the Flag, Do some cool twists that aren't "lets make a milsim mode" 
Titan mode was a funny one because when they moved they'd kill the game.
The game would actively die.
The lab tests isn't just for the above average players dude.
I know that but above average players are much more enjoyable to watch and can test things much better lol
Not even trying to be mean either
Tbf
You did say ".42 kd mouth breathers" 
I know we have been and tired of it, Honestly after BF6 I fine for DICE to go back to BF2142 era in the future, plus they have the OG dev of Titanfall, to help so who knows maybe mech vehicle combat will be amazing, but of course this is all riding on BF6 success
Tbf those are the people who had the common sense to not leak footage in the first place
True
Something something 5min of fame type shit
lmao BF all chat brain took over

Just keep the soldiers grounded, none of that BLOPS3 and Titanfall wall running
Can guarantee you won’t be seeing that in battlefield
you will never see jetpacks and wall running in BF lmao
It’s perfect for small team 6v6, but for bf it just wouldn’t
Yup, that would be the final nail in the coffin for The franchise
Wait
The movement portion is what y'all were talking bout

It did come off a bit condonscending.
I do like what they've done to at least encourage thought though.
Of course
I’m talking about DICE going back to BF2142 era, but not having the wall running
Tbh
I don't think that's a good idea 
After if BF6 succeed
Cool if done correctly? Sure
Otherwise, 
My one fear for another stab at the future setting is the need to for some reason fill them with auto turrets and wallhacks
None of that please
My only reasoning for now is because I never got to experience battlefield’s take on future warfare of BF2142 because of COD brain rot, at the time, so I never got to experience the Titan Assault mode other then BF4’s rendition
It'd be interesting if you could stick to walls for only a second.
To jump off them.
But it's such a weird idea I don't think it'd ever happen
That'd scare some people 
Good, gunsmithing is cringe af
Simple is sometimes better
BF2143 should be a movement shooter, it should be Titanfall 3 in big maps
It really is, gunsmithing turns the game to play 2 win, you grind attachments to get better at the game, delta force's progression system is just stacking stability attachments to have no recoil guns instead of learning recoil itself 
Only attachments should be simple, grips, bipods, barrel attachments and optics
And even barrel attachments should be limited to silencer or no silencer
Once you get into compensators it starts building meta builds for try hards
if there's shotguns, some different muzzles for spread is nice too
one wider, one tighter basically
Yeah like duck bill
Duckbill is pointless honestly
Agreed I never use it
As long as it doesn’t do things like affect recoil
oh i kinda like when it does. slight recoil benefit for the tradeoff of not being hidden as well as a suppressor does
zero recoil cod weapons would be hell
Nah then you’re getting into meta building
The tradeoff for silencer should be reduced damage at range
nice, i like that
The benefit is no mini map ping
simple and makes sense
flash hider usually gives reduced radius map ping, but would need some minor benefit as well
Flash hider you are harder to spot at a distance or something unless they’re ads or have done damage already
I don’t think it’s going to happen but I wish they’d tweak the conquest mode as well
how so
Give your squad sub objectives and such
Like go here, grab intel, bring it back to base for a recon hav squad leader call in or something
Stuff like that
But, have an enemy squad given the same objective
Or like in V they purposely built areas that weren’t in the flag capture areas, but were crucial to holding to assaulting a flag. So like, take and hold this area for x time
Idk something different
I love the classic conquest don’t get me wrong, but having things like that to keep it fresh and team oriented would be welcome to me
So hotwire 
Hotwire is such a good mode
Kinda
Not kinda
But the team objectives stay the same
It was really good
I meant kinda like Hotwire not that it wasn’t good
But these objectives are squad level only and aren’t really detrimental if you ignore them
Or I guess more objective based bonuses
Like if your team get an ammo dump objective, you spawn fully rearmed
Or a vehicle depot lets you repair faster or something
I have a genuine question for all, if the next battlefield game has SBMM/EOMM, or you done with the franchise or nah?
I just don’t know how sbmm could work in a game like this
Even if you’re a top fps player, if you lone wolf, you’re gonna die to a decently organized squad
Sbmm has no place in battlefield I feel
Knowing EA it’s always a possibility, an Ex DICE dev came out and said they’re jealous of how much cod makes off SBMM.
How does cod make money off of sbmm
Probably around 3.4 billion is my guess
eomm keeps cod players playing cod
and if they keep playing they keep buying stuff
EOMM ruined cod
The player base is dropping hard rn as we speak
i assume battlefield will have some degree of sbmm, even if its just as minor as "new players don't get put into matches with 1000hr players"
if there's a server browser it doesn't matter
if there's no server browser i'll immediately be pretty disappointed
If it has SBMM then battlefield is dead forever
i don't mind brand new players being protected for the first five hours or something, i don't wanna play against or with them anyway lmao
We need server browser
yeah. it just makes the game so much better
Server browser and map rotation play list. Not being sent to the lobby after every match
Has anyone been invited to Battlefield Labs in Asia?
Atm it's only NA and EU that has test servers and invites
seems like its mostly lower-playtime players they've been inviting so far
fingers crossed i get to help test
SBMM is like those admins that put the best player on there team instead of keeping it randomized, I rather have the RNG Gods, decided the fate of my match rather then some person who can’t accept that losing is part of the experience
Yes, 100%
I don't wanna Play an algorithm deciding if today I'll have fun or not.
I want to play a video game.
There is not going to be a server browser at launch and they’re are going to rig every single game you play because it’s modern gaming (and it sucks).


pls bring team switch, im tired of losing
learn to lose bruh
team switch just creates unbalanced teams
there's only 2 reasons why a person would switch teams:
- to play with their friends who are in the other team (except if ur in a squad to begin with, you ARE in the same team)
- ur losing and u wanna join the winning team
so there's only 1 reason
i learned many time and im very tired
idc about unbalanced
at least i just want to having fun
and this is my reason
but to have fun you can do so much than just winning
everyone wants to win, should EA put everyone on the same team?
call me loser or weak or anything, idc about that
no
every player has different reason
so just put the whiney people in the winning team 
there's a lot to bf games usually that count towards having fun imo, such as progression of weapons or levels, playing a certain class or playstyle, going out with ur squadmates on small missions to capture objectives. if winning was the only way to have fun, i feel like either you're playing it wrong or the game's not designed well
they do but simply adding team change solely for the reason of switching to the winning side just doesn't sound like a valid reason to bring back that feature
just pls add that feature
f22 in bf6
l like to now why players on TDM game mode like to bully new players and tell then to piss of and don't join the community there is two players Majorgeneral and Horry-Aus these two bully new players, l thought this wa suppose to be a friendly community

it doesnt
see: delta force warfare
50 vs 50
The whole SBMM in Battlefield discussion isn't as complex as people make it out to be imo.
Battlefield as a concept was created and intended to function without a system like SBMM or EOMM. With SBMM there can be no server browser, which would be an extremely bad blow to the franchise
Nothing about SBMM is compatible with what players want out of the next Battlefield game
If they make the mistake of including SBMM / EOMM Battlefield as we all know it will cease to exist. It will not play the same
Besides, a 64 player game doesn't need such a system. A team balancer has proven to be just fine in some of the best BF games ever made
That’s why a server browser should be included, I have no idea why they are trying to get away from that.
They want $$$. EX DICE dev said they're jealous of COD. They're 100% looking at the "data" and if EA wants SBMM the devs have no control really
They aren't going to consider the wants of the playerbase when it comes to this decision
Battlefield has gradually moved away from server browsers for years now. Every new game it has slowly disappeared.
We'll see what they do. Judging from what I've seen I'd bet the game doesn't have a server browser for the base game.

have invite emails been sent out yet?
Team Switching is to exploitive, Official and Community Made Server should have for BF6 an automatic randomizer, so at the start of a new match players will be randomizer within the two teams no skill base, at least there is less chance of one side matches, that is if Server browser comes back
Skill balancer for teams maybe. Not SSBM, but just sorts teams so their cumulative 'skill' is equal
Yes
One balance I'd like to see is about game sessions. I love breakthrough, but in the same play session, 8 games played, being 7 times in the defense team... boring. Especially when the same map shows twice consecutively.
I don't really mind winning or loosing as long as their is a good fight along the game, but yes please bring back fix map rotation and alternate attack/defence cycle in between the teams.
auto team switch is mostly evil and bad for sure and a must is to keep squads togehter
should just bring back operations in general, makes breakthrough way more interesting
i know you got the invite enders
(im joking)
but if you do have fun n Good luck
i wont be playing the next game if it have sbmm ill just play portal w ith server browser
pls server browser for the main game day one dice
i beg you
Agreed. It’s way more interesting
I'd like that, to add some stake to the games.
Step 1: breakthrough - if attack team wins, they start the next round with already captured flags
Step 2: Conquest - if attack team wins, they start the next round closer to enemy spawn
Step 3: Front Line, the games starts closer to one spawn or another depending on the conquest results.
this concept sounds like BF5's grand operations.
And damn I miss that
Those 3 steps could be on the same map at 3 different time of the day/night
then yeah, its just bf5's grand operations. on some maps, the first day is usually airborne and its done at night-time. if attackers/defenders lose then its on the same map but with a different gamemode and on day time.
but grand ops wasnt well recieved by players then bf1's operations
They felt pretty pointless cause progression was forced.
Well, this game mode is all about objectives. If you're in a team with players only caring about their K/D you're stuck for 3 rounds in a row with a handicap.
Maybe it's more appealing to old school players.
it wasnt about the objectives though, i get what your vision is however people loved BF1's operations because it felt like your team was regrouping and coming back with a bigger force i.e. attackers being supported by a behemoth. for most people including myself felt attackers don't get outright punished for losing cause the game progresses anyway even after losing
unfortunately man, i think they're not gonna add back the server browser. the end of round mention matchmaking at the end. its probably gonna still use 2042's matchmaking system
insert a gif of the office "No god please no"
tfw no more Operation Metro 24/7 | 1200 Tickets | NO SHOTGUNS, RPGs 😔
OH NOOOOOOOOOOO
Yes that was great, the sense of "we didn't take the sector, we're coming stronger with an extra asset" and the game continues with the music kicking in, absolute cinema.
But I preferred the mix of game modes in BFV operations. The stake of winning/loosing a round was not great enough imo.
i understand. it would be cool to see bf1 operations and bf5's grand ops be mixed. but since im not a game designer, im not sure how that would exactly work or the limitations by frostbite but yeah. i rly liked the airborne section* cuz its cool to jump out of a plane with the epic music playing in the background
Airborn mode on Hannut, forever in my heart.
yep hands down best to play airborne on that map
some maps like that one desert one just gets everyone killed 💀
Yes, it's the same email. Were they sent?
should be but idk i didn't get access
its probably sent by now. but i think the last day of email invites is tomorrow i believe, and then the actual playtest starts on friday
I think that the last day is today. Tomorrow they will send playtime invitation with direct timings
At least that was the case last time
That's a shame I wish I got in
if you outside us and na you wont get in
I'm american
They should look at the data that says BO6 lost 70% of their players due to SBMM since launch 😛
If there is anything they should take from CoD, it's camo grind. People like me loves doing challenges for guns and getting camos, eventually unlocking rare camos that requires effort.
I would say take inspiration from MW2019’s gunsmith system
I hope not
New added weapons should be unlocked by accomplishing challenges, like in BF1 instead of the "reach level 45 of the temporary season" style of BFV/2042
@young jetty
If you miss the season you unlock them with challenges
I hate fomo based season system. I was abroad during the halloween event, where weapons could be unlocked, and I'm going to be abroad for half the upcoming tiny season. This kind of system sucks...
You're only missing skins
yes, that I have no other way of getting outside of this temporary event.
What's the big deal about missing skins
Ehh idk about one, MW2019’s was just really simple, no matter how attachments you put on, it’s still felt realistic and immersive.
MW19 is the first game that turned it into a MTX economy, you can grind to unlock meta attachments or buy this new blueprint to unlock them right away 🤣
Its hardly a FOMO system when its easy as hell to unlock the stuff. You can hardly blame a games systems if you are going to be away when they are running a limited time event...like the Halloween one.
I dislike unlocking guns in general 🤷
I've been playing BF for 15 years I don't need to unlock same guns and attachments again and again 😂
You do tho. 😉
this exists in warzone rn too i personally like it but then i wanna grind other guns too which initself is prolly a good thing too but i might never use the gun i originally maxed out cause “what if they get nerfed or buff some other gun”
MW19’s blueprint system was more about convenience than locking attachments behind a paywall. If you wanted to grind, you still had the option.
New guns are almost always better
The post last season of BFV system was good. All items are in the shop, you get in-game currency by playing, spend them on what you like.
It's just another way to make 🤑
Only 2 new guns were actually OP in 2042 TBH. The BSV-M and the RM68. the rest that people called OP were just cases of recency bias.
BF BR shouldn't follow Warzone style buy loadouts system too imo
They should follow blackout or pubg model, you land in, you find guns, you find attachments
Gunsmithing is incompatible with that
Getting your own loadout guaranteed every game is lame
You know that’s gonna happens, all of the COD players are gonna be begging on their knees.
literally pointless to loot aside from getting $ to get the loadout
BF BR shouldn't copy CoD considering Warzone is already dying because it's Warzone
There are more players that want a fresh new BR, than COD players.
PUBG is a better BR to copy than WZ
It has a way better looting loop, and has a decent amount of downtime (If you choose to have downtime).
They would just need a decent inventory system to make a BR work like PUBG, loot wise.
The VHX and the Avancys when they came out
VHX nor avancys were all that OP. they were just new.
wz i cant even use the guns that i like cause some terminator skin with the newest “meta smg” slides right towards me and hits all headshots consequtively and completely solos my whole fully geared squad simply by sliding everywhere
They did get nerfed
The LCMG was still miles better than the Avancys, people just get blinded by the new shiny toy
Same with people calling the DFR Strife a god gun, and its terrible 😄
EA hired Byron Beede an ex call of duty GM for the head of Ripple Effect, correct me if I’m wrong did he make Warzone 1?
Yeah, shouldn't mean he should make warzone 1 again imo
U say that but that what IW tried to do in warzone 2 and warzone 2 flopped
Never seen anyone say that
DFR is good if you use it with big supp + subsonic
Warzone 1 is 10x better than Warzone 2.0 
i want my mp7 back in 2042 😔
90 rounds of pure camping though, or flanking
Byron Beede is a SVP GM of the Franchise, not head of Ripple Effect
I can have 200 with others
There are 3/4 other LMGs that do that job better tho, with 200 round mags
I disagree. WZ1 was peak BR more then PUBG. BF is more closer to COD in BR space then BF to PUBG for the sole reason for mechanics and gameplay. Hell, the armor plate system in WZ was directly inspired by BF firestorm.
With the same reload speed even if i remember correctly
Warzone system isn't good tbh regardless of WZ1 or 2, I think actual looting would benefit BF BR more than landing in and buying your loadout
If you get your loadout every game it removes randomness from BR experience
WZ1 is BR lite at best
That actually worries me a lot now
Blackout still peak cod br
It was good because it was easy to play, and accessible
Then what makes a good BR. Both pubg and wz had you loot, have downtime and a large open map with vehicles
better looting across the board
WZ looting is just basic AF. And when they tried to make their inventory system better...they completely fucked it up.
PUBG is a better sandbox experience IMO, kinda similar to what you get in BF.
I just don't see BF trying pubgs looting system
It has boiled down to just looting money and the occasional useful equipment that drops
PUBG
then get to a buy station as fast as possible to get everything you need
Simplicity is better than complexity in terms of inventory management in a battle Royale setting
Its not like its crazy complex loot system. You just have ground loot thats basic weapons, then the other ground loot is attachments, ammo, ETC
COD just made it accessible/casual by removing attachments as ground loot.
And making ammo basically not need to be looted
Wym though by ammo? Attachments I understand but ammo?
Yeah, COD just streamlined it by removing attachments as ground loot, but that also took away a layer of decision-making. Now, it’s just about finding a gun and going, instead of piecing together an ideal setup. But that’s what made Warzone fun in the first place tho
You can totally skip all of the looting in current WZ tho, which makes it really boring and repetitive. Cos your best chance of winnjing is by getting cash, then just buying a loadout drop. Yawn fest gameplay loop
no more ziplines n redeploy ziplines i can count how many times ive been in a car with one hand thanks to them, make getting your loadout more expensive no more buybacks when you return from the gulag and die again n have someone buy you out, nerf sliding all over the place
Get rid of redeploy beacons, self res and have limited buy backs...and you'd solve a lot of the issues with WZ.
I was more talking about WZ1. I stopped playing warzone when they integrate it with vanguard and I tried wz2 and 3 but it's all slop
wz1 was p good im sad i couldnt experience it
It was insanely better than what the game is now.
Ahh man you shoulda. That 2020 covid warzone experience was peak
yup the gas isnt even a issue nowadays cause you can just redeploy closer to the zone
Most of modern CoDs problems stems from Warzone 
And vice versa
WZ integration was a mistake
Sledgehammer wanted to bring back pick 10 for MWIII yet they couldn't because WZ integration demands gunsmithing
thats what i always hear but my big brother only plays wz2 n im cursed with playing w him no matter how many times i try to make him return to battlefield
? Why he doesn't wanna play bf
worst part he was the one who got me to play bf3 in the early days n he always flew a jet now hes stuck in cod
likes the “teamwork” more but the teamwork dont even matter when everyone slides all over the place and solos our whole squad
Zombies is fun if you play it with your friends
hell yeah
2042 is getting it's own zombies today too 😛
we were up til 2am yday playing zombies he got a kid n i have work today but it was still fun
I hope next BF gets rid off fomo elements tbh, rush override lasts for a whole week, way to waste a whole game mode like that imo
Indeed
fomo elements also make ppl sell accounts
atleast thats what i think abt my ancient pokemon go account w a shiny celebi
I dislike FOMO because BF games are usually timeless games
Look at BF1, 20-30K daily players despite being almost 10 years old
Or BF4 still going strong
2042 will be dead the moment BF6 drops
Deserved death tbh
Double edged sword. On one hand it is absolutely awful when a gamemode you like isn’t playable, but by limiting the available modes it should in theory make it so the modes that are active have more people
2042 wont be dead because of FOMO stuff it had/has tho. It will be dead cos its a game that hates you trying to play it 😛
Well at least those who might come back to 2042 won't be in an empty server? Sure you'll be fighting bots but I guess better than nothing
Ideally we should have a weekly playlist and a server browser at the same time(weekly games are also played in server browser), people will be more inclined to try weird modes they haven't played and other people who likes those modes will still be able to play it
2042 be like:
Play match > join with 200 tickets left > return to lobby > join new game > Game is half way over > return to lobby > find new game > the map sucks > Return to lobby > Get sick of all this shit > ALT +F4
I srsly hope a server browser is available for 6 but the end of round screen says otherwise 😭
It's pre alpha
Or at least make it like bf4/5 system
Yeah, since loads of people just use the quick match options anyway that’d be the best of both worlds
No need to be concerned right now tbh
even persistent lobbies with map rotations would solve 90% of my issues with 2042.
If BF6 open beta still lacks server browsers then it's time to be concerned
A goddamn map selector at bare minimum
We will have to wait and see
I hate the fact that battlefield and EA keep sending me emails
But it’s not an invitation >:(
Was hyped about one too. Turns out, it was just a reported cheater getting banned and not an invitation. 
That's good news too
the more you want that invitation? the more harder it will be to acquire one... that's why I chose to voice my suggestion here, it's not much but who know... they could be watching us at this very moment, torturing us... waiting for us to finally snap and commit a mutiny on this server... (<v<;
Oh not, but you might as well be patient (-v-
they probably are looking at this channel here and there
That's a problem only when daily actives are too low to populate at least one server for each game mode.
if leaks are out, might as well see what people here think
Maybe that's just what they want you to think
It's probably some kind of algorithm that automatically picks people at random to the test, because who has the time to hand pick people tbh
There's software automation for that kind of thing
Good morning friends!
Another Day, another invite to a game that is not Battlefield 
EA is trolling me at this point
and maybe that is the Truth, and we just cannot accept the reality that is in front of us... there was no Battlefield 6... there was no invitation... there was no test... we are the test (0v0;
Damn. So is it confirmed that it’s only been PlayStation and PC so far for the alpha?
Haven’t seen that anywhere
I’m looking real lonely over as a Series X owner waiting for an invite 😂😂
Copy that. Guess all the leaks I’ve seen have been either PC or PlayStation
if they were trolling, they'd make EA app even buggier than it is
This is 90% of my frustration with that game
probably because either has better / more compatible hardware for the testing
Should we get a sixth class for battlefield?
You forgot to mention that every game you got into was the same map as well
Like battlebit has medic as a separate class
Though wasn’t medic/support class was in bad company and bad company 2?

Im all for simplifying class makeup, if that mean they are going to make gameplay more advanced/complex.
I see I see.
The Medic, Assault and Engineer Class are constantly going back and forth, while the Support and Recon Class have stayed consistent
BF4 the Medic change to the Assault Class
well Support was Medic back in BFBC2
back in the old BF era of BF2-2142 (best games of BF series), there were 7 classes, Recon, Sniper, Assault, Support, Engineer, Medic, Anti Tank
they just merged Sniper into Recon, Medic into Support, and Anti Tank into Engineer and kept Assault it's own thing
Best to have 4 classes, then have players specialize themselves. AKA, You can have a recon class, but then have specializations that let them be reconnaissance, sniper, or spec ops. All with different perks that come with selection.
but Medic bascially means Support and the other way around doesnt it?
People are just blinded by having static classes, and demand more. when its a better system to have 4 roughly defined roles, then let players tweak how those play themselves.
BF3 classes was Medic, Engineer, Support, and Recon
BF4 was Assault, Engineer, Support, and Recon
BF1 was Assault, Medic, Support and Recon
And I am going blank on BFV and Hardline
I think BFV stay the same in BF1
Besides, without class weapon restrictions it feels pretty pointless splitting them up
And I think in Hardline one of the classes was changed to Enforcer?
HL was Operator(assault/medic), Mechanic(Engineer), Enforcer(Support), and Professional(Recon)
Ty that’s what it was all of them had different names
Finally someone who agrees with me about 3D spotting
:
https://youtu.be/L0Yq88WAiuU
Speaking of Spotting if they are bring back the revive mechanic from BFV and BF2042, they have to let us spot enemies while we down, I always found that dumb that we can’t do that
in BF2042 you can spot while down
If I remember correctly was it only your squadmate can se it?
true
Not to mention players have been getting way too comfortable, running away, after downing, an enemy
Would rather not
It’s silly
sometimes I just hit redeploy instead of getting killed xD
BFV tried that with Class Archetypes no ? 🤔
Please no. You shouldn’t be punished for killing someone before they can spot you
Yeah, get rid of that downed spotting and tagging.
Its such a load of crap that a player you kill can tag and spot you for their squad in 2042
Treat downed players as if they are totally incapacitated
after you kill them no less
i've beaten them in a fight, now their entire squad knows where i am and can just converge on me
They should have balanced that with being able to full kill the down so no revive
Its more fun to allow the downed state, but disallow downed spot/ping
And by "downed state", I dont mean downed state crawling
Support could benefit from having both meds and ammo. I don't have any numbers but they always felt like the most underplayed class.
well that's how support is going to work this next game most likely (if no changes for that are done)
both meds and ammo, and in a single crate no less
Falck is one of the most played in 2042, but thats due to their stim pistol/ammo crate combo. With the new mechanics behind resupply, I think the new supply crate (Combined ammo/health) can be really good.
i do wonder how a single med/ammo crate combo will work
does it activate both things at once, or what you need, or is it something you aim at and press left click for ammo/right click for meds 
or is keybinds that you press instead
Its both at once. Health when you need it/can take it. Then when you enter the radius of it, time to resupply counters for your equipment start. When a piece of gear reaches is resupply timer (All gear has different timers for resupply) that gear is partially restocked
I'm also ok with assault getting ammo but never meds again. Support getting both could be better for the overall balance among classes I feel like.
So as an example, a smoke nade might have a resupply timer of 3 seconds, an RPG 8 seconds, an AT mine 9 seconds, ETC. All the restock timers count in sync (at the same time)
Its something BF has needed for a long time TBH. Instant resupply of 1 of each gear seems so terrible for balancing in comparison to this newer system
Not gonna lie loitering near an ammo box waiting for you stuff to refilled was genuinely really aggravating.
A passive timer so you can instantly get stuff back is far more intuitive.
I disagree. An instant resupply of one of each item would be far better, then have your cool down thing you described.
Then you have the same as we have now. And the new system is made pointless
Explain why.
Why change it? Why go from getting an instant resupply of one item and then the cool down?
I havent play tested. Ive just been reading
Don’t fix what isn’t broken
I would like to try it out and maybe it would be better, but im locked out of my ea account forever
What is wrong with this change, you need to explain the issue with it.
They likely added it to stop the behavior players have with ammo crates. Aka treating them as single use instant resupply, especially for equipment.
Ammo for weapons could remain instant, at least partially. But it would be much better if a player needing a rocket would need to wait on a crate for a few seconds, instead of getting it instantly.
Is there a way to confirm I signed up for Labs? I feel like I log in and dont see anything related to BF but I see Skate
DICE please gib customizable red dot options/reticle customization 🙏
once you ssigned up, you're signed up
now you wait for email for possible invite
oh ok!
Not wanting change is not a good enough reason for not changing something
which is like winning the lotto 
But what is wrong with the current system?
"They likely added it to stop the behavior players have with ammo crates. Aka treating them as single use instant resupply, especially for equipment."

I just explained what's wrong with it. You get equipment and resupply too fast.
I don’t see that as an issue
You only get one rocket and then need to wait anyway
It’s not like you get all 4 etc at once
A player with a launcher, mines and a HE nade would get 1 of all 3 instantly under the current system.
This is behavior they clearly don't want.
Are you saying the new system makes you wait for one rocket as well? Like you get to the crate. Have zero grenades and need to wait 3 seconds for one, so 9 seconds total for all 3?
Yes
i don't really care
but it does suck rockets don't get resupplied faster to supplement my zooking addiction 
Every piece of equipment resupplies at different speeds, based on utility and power.
Considering how powerful explosives seem to be with the returning debris damage system from 3, limiting how fast people can get explosives is good
So, why do the devs want to do that? Why are they making it into a problem. Getting 1 out of 3 makes for more engagement and better gameplay
Not really
They're probably going back to how it was before bfv and 2042
Are you not reading?
I believe it's more intuitive to get resupplied as soon as you arrive near an ammo box, and they have to wait near it to get ressuplied more. Rather than having to wait near it to get your 1st resupply.
You are saying the instant resupply is the reason why and I find that to be the issue
I need to leave for an appt. Ill be back later
Players will run to a crate, get 1 of all gear, then run away from the crate, or wait for the timer when they can resupply at it again.
And? I dont see the problem
That’s dumb
You don't cos you just want infinite easy rockets, but that's potentially bad for balance
So they are going for an even slower paced game?
Oh no!!!
You still have to wait anyway. One rocket doesn’t do anything
Man, you are so full of yourself in your responses
You aren't thinking about what you are proposing, or how it would make their new resupply system irrelevant
I'm just using my brain, sorry about that
I have not been sarcastic, I have pointed out how you aren't thinking about how the resupply loop works now, or how it would work if you instant resupply on first entry to crate zone. Or how that breaks the intention of this new system entirely
People, who say obviously. Are rude
Lol
Yes, i get that, but the current system isnt broken
The only problem with the current system is that you have to get out of the box area of effect and enter it again to get a new round of resupply. You currently cannot just wait next to it and get fully resupplied over time.
What? I have to wait and I dont get resupplied right away in bf1, or 2042. After leaving the circle and coming back
Yeah? What’s wrong with a slower paced game
Don't know why you're getting so mad. I'm just explaining how it's working now, my understanding of why they did it this way and why doing what you have suggested makes the change they've made irrelevant
Im not mad at all
You clearly are.
Yea because it is irrelevant.
Lol
Are you sure?
That’s how i feel talking to you
Let say you're a 0 rocket, you enter the ammo box circle, you get 1 rocket instantly. That ok. But if you stay in the circle, even after the cooldown resets, you need to exit the circle and go back in again to gat a 2nd rocket.
You're the one not getting it and refusing any change. 🤣
I get it entirely, but you havent explained why the current system is unbalanced. Where is the unbalance. The fanbase has not complained about it being an issue
You said the reason for the change
But like, the current system works perfectly
thank god someone gets it
So it doesnt make sense to change it
This will have players not use crates as they intend right now also. Players as they do now (in 2042) will just run to a crate, get their gear, then move on.
They want to make supply crates more important in placement /position and use.
You just said we have to wait when we get to the crate, so how are going to arrive at the crate and move on?
Dear lord. Read
Then they need to remove this mandatory action of leaving the box area/reentering the box area and instead continue to ressuply automatically once the cooldown resets and players will stick to the ammo box.
I actually have to leave
Or re-do it BFV style, with a interaction prompt.
The resupply timers is like a player reaching the crate and having to manually find the equipment they need, and adding it to a pouch. But done automatically
You basically need to enter and stand your ground in the crate area to resupply.
I like it tbh. Not played it, but I see what they are going for.
I guess my main concern before I go. Is we have this new team of devs who have’t worked on bf before other than 2042 and they will probably mess it up again because they are out of touch with the fanbase. The labs was a good move though because they need it
Also having the instant round of resupply as soon as you reach the box avoids being in the situation where you run for a box, have to wait and the box disappeared before you get anything because the support guy placed it elsewhere.
No clue how they combat that, but it's an obvious flaw which I'm sure they have considered
Maybe you fix it by not despawning crates on death, and allowing support to place 2 at the same time, but not close together (time wise) A third removes the first placed crate.
You'd still run into this issue, just less commonly
I still believe the BFV way of doing it was the good way to go. Having to interreact with it. You couldn't just aim down your sight while waiting to get replenished.
bf2042 was EA's fault
Press F not to insert bullets directly into your blood stream and shoot healing syringes at your enemies
And the devs. Have you played the finals? The Embark studios is all ex-dice devs
the devs are only 25% at fault.
Its not. the majority of the devs that left DICE (It was not THAT many) joined TTK Games
75% is EA
and yes i played the finals. the same DICE that has the same lead that told us "if you dont like it dont buy it"
I liked it and bought it. Was that in reference to bfv? Best one of the series for mechanics of the soldier
I do understand EA and execs shoving money money money down the throats of devs though
Who are TTK games
They could combat that by instantly resupplying one of each item.
How is a crate disapearing before you reach it combatted by this may I ask?
Solution to the previously stated issue is to not de-spawn in use crates
my point was the old DICE is not all sunshine and rainbows then it is right now.
old DICE was out of touch during BFV marketing and launch
No, just the waiting part and the crate disappearing while you are already there waiting.
I guess the items could continue their cooldown for 1 item even if the crate despawns.
Can’t disagree there, but the game was amazing even if marketed wrong
Was good until they decided to change the movement, gameplay and TTK every other month
For V? That had the best movement
Read the full sentence. Constant changes made it an inconsistent experience.
I played hardcore, so TTK wasn’t an issue really
My guy. All im asking about is the movement portion of your sentence
We are talking about V right?
You didnt ask anything, you just said movement was good. It was good, but they changed it, the gameplay (Constant attrition changes/its removal/nerfing), then all the weapons TTK too often (even after promising not to). It made me dislike the game.
For V?
Yes
Yes for V, its what we were talking about lol
I was clarifying if you are talking about five. Thank you
the instigating is crazy
Im jumping in and out of convo
Im just yanking your chain lol
I know and I respect the HP reference. I was at my appt, so I couldn’t do long responses
Responded in between them leaving and coming in the room lol
What was changed? I recall we can crouch run. Dive backwards. Lay prone and 360 degree rotate our soldiers with the legs staying in place. The vaulting was good and the window vaulting was good. Grabbing ledges was good too. I think you could grab ledges. It has been awhile.
Did they remove some of those things? I think I last played V about 6-12 months ago
I do now remember they removed the single handed pistol use from in the water and climbing ladders from 4.
mess with the crabbo get the stabbo
add me to labs dice. I got like 10 hours a day free atm 😛
Playtests only happen for a few hours on a single day. Your free time won't help much right now. 😉
Plus EA isn't gonna choose everyone that has the most free time, highest bandwidth, most battlefield's played, cracked out of their minds, sweaty, etc.
True facts!
I'd argue that they'd choose the opposite of those people in the beginning, people who are new to the series, not very "power users" of their controllers/KBM, people with accessibilities so that they make sure the foundation is built to teach new players and not only catered to the average sweatlord
your not going places everybody thoes days
An average battlefield player is going to be familiar with the UX/UI/HUD/menus, while new players to the franchise will be very new to the menus and way of things so it's best to pick a lot of those in the beginning of almost any software alpha testing so that you can get ACTUAL feedback on UI/UX from a newbie perspective rather than someone who's already used to the past installments
Yea, its a lottery and i sure am know that i am not gonna get selected
well yeah from our perspective it is a bit of a lottery lol
but they know exactly who they want at each stage
Eh, debatable considering what they’re testing
Rn most of the ui is placeholder, so that doesn’t matter much.
It absolutely does matter, feedback is taken from the start
Fair. I’ve personally talked about my opinions of the ui so I guess it did bring a good amount of feedback
I've worked with software which literally just brewed up. Just because you're not working on UI at this current stage doesn't mean the feedback from new comers isn't valuable because the people who work on UI start day 1, research on previous titles, referencing other games, making sure the flow of UX is designed so even a not-stakeholder/non-customer of said product can access each menu without thinking too hard. "Great UI is invisible" I fucking love UX
Idk how much we're allowed to talk about leaks, but looking at some on reddit, I can see they went all-out with the information overload also making the UI aggressively huge which is a common tactic for these beginner friendly tests too, you gotta make sure they see all the UI feedback and can react to it, I wouldn't be surprised if there's some way they're tracking actions with the actual interface feedback
No they don't. It's entirely random
tbh
they could simply transfer 2042's menu UI layout into BF6
that one is simple and to the point 
We’re allowed to talk about commonly known leaks
you got LTMs, BT, CQ, Portal, Other modes
and then settings
I’d be fine with that if they make the bottom middle and right like 4. Also with some tweaks to fit the theme
The gun icons are completely useless imo
No it wouldn't fit art style at all also 2042s ui isn't that good
It's not bro 😭 trust
It is
"layout"
i'm not talking the art style of the U, just the basic layout of it lol
5 selections that open into sub selections of modes
settings
quit game option (for pc)
simple and to the point
Every "sprint", the team focuses on certain aspects. You have a foundation right now, which is not going to change unless mass feedback says otherwise. Every stage or "sprint' you're building this new feature into the game which requires testing at the end of it. They test it internally but that's not enough, which is where the others come in. As a tester you're given like 2 to 3 hours per like 2 weeks to test out these new features. You're building something specific, you're not gonna employ absolute randoms, that adds so much risk of bias. What if you end up with people who are only sweats? There's always a chance. There's a reason they didn't open labs for like a month because they wanted so many people to choose from. It's not random.
Wrong reply lol
Not entirely random. The survey we filled out to become a potential tester specifically mentioned those questions were to get participation from a diverse group of players. Different opinions from different places, experiences, etc is what they want.
It is Randoms btw
💀
Wtf
Its giving you the benefit of the doubt and not calling you stupid.
either way
they better not make a hulu ass style menu for this upcoming game
I mean I'm trying to explain why I think it's not random and if all you got in reply is "It's random btw" what am I supposed to say 😂
we need the flashiest one with rgb everywhere, kinda like fragpunk
In general it was like winning the lottery (lots signed up, few slots) and a spread around all types of players. I would not base my feelings around the
selection process based on the single leakers personal performance :). I get everyone wants in (l want you all
there) 1/2
But we need to start small and get everything to run smoothly and then go wider. First test was successful - now we can take the next steps! Have a great weekend! 2/2
From David sirland
that menu actually hurt my eyes more than the actual. gameplay 
"like winning the lottery" and "random" are COMPLETELY different things. a chaos function in math seems "random" until you know the function itself
You dont have any evidence of it being not random
its like random to us, it's not random fo rthem
they have a million+ accounts' info, they're picking the ones they want right now
it's for their and the game's benefit, idk whats there to not understand
Yeah that to but mostly random
sometimes idek whats going on, makes me feel too old
Here the problem. You have nothing to back up your claims, its just assumptions with no baseline.
As per what the survey we filled put implies, it organized people into buckets based on certain background criteria, and then its random based on that. So yes its determined. And yes its random.
If you have anything to back it up please show me
flashy UI aside, that shit was annoying to navigate with all the random shit going on on it
variety, diversity and random are also different

