#battlefield-labs-discussion
1 messages · Page 49 of 1
shouldn't be in something like labs though, they'd be stupid to do that
I want soo badly to test the shit out of this lol
yeah definitely not labs, keep it to in-house testing
i really wish they'd stop making battlefield campaigns, and instead dump the development money into making the multiplayer even better
if Battlefield 4 never had guns unlocked at the very end of the campaign, I never would've bothered with it
Glad they didn't lock the UCAV behind the campaign though
2042:
They did that with 2042 and looked how that turned out
yes, good argument
campaigns are good and fun and a part of battlefield, i'm glad they're sticking with them
that was a special circumstance what with covid worldwide messing things up
AND IT NEEDS TO BE LINEAR

people do still enjoy them as well, otherwise dice wouldn't bother
true
but look at feature parity to BF2
took us until 4 to get most of the features back
We don’t talk about BFV
MOST
yeah ngl i didn't play bf2 so i can't say anything about it
BFV was really fun for me
i dont like to compare games because i just wanna have fun, but i think bfv was successful imo
I’m sorry to be that guy but BFV was not successful
idc bro 😭 it was super fun
If you liked you liked it but from a general standpoint the game flopped terribly.
if ur talking about campaign then yes
i guess ur success criteria is different from the rest, probs cuz ur comparing to bf3/4
The entire package
im not gonna argue about this cuz its just a useless conv
theres no success criteria here, so it's just a comparison game
BFV was fun
zooking and sniping were quite fun in bfv, the gunplay...... 
I don't think the gunplay was bad but in retrospective it was basic.
the spread = recoil + decoupled screen center reticle was quite annoying
BFV pinnacle was at Pacific Theater and everything was fine. Till someone made the decision that the TTK needed to be changed that Christmas. After that went downhill
True.
It was entirely successful until they stopped content after the Pacific update
Which would be a horrible comparison as BF4 was a horrid unplayable mess the first year and half before they turned it around
^^
it also doesn't really make sense to compare to bf4 which is not only a very old game now but also not designed for the same time lol
i just hate the whole "bf3 bf4 was peak" like sure it was, but you really have to bring that in when comparing anything?
@glacial orchid @winter viper the bois? 
like bro times have changed, people have grown up, and yeah sure bf3 and bf4 were god damn amazing but i dont want a bf4 remaster 😭
😉
Neither do I, people are just stuck in nostalgia.
What's funny about nostalgia it's never as good as you remember it lol
some people haven't played bf3 or bf4 since it stopped being the main game, and it shows 
^ people scared of a slide in game or moving too fast
Turn your FOV to 50, and let everyone else enjoy the game Grandpa
I didn’t compare BFV to BF3/4
BFV’s launch was just terrible and it sold less
BFV bad sales in my opinion were because of bad PR lol. Dont buy the game if you dont like it I believe the phrase was
Also the launch trailer was definitely something 😂
Launch trailer was cool as fuck. Issue was they also marketted BFV as an Authentic WW2 game.
I still want that skin where the lady had a hook hand 😂 where is it DICE
the phrase "its WW2 like you never seen before" 😂 yeah nobody saw it like that
I’m praying on my knees that doesn’t happen again, DICE can NOT afford another controversy.
I wouldnt say it was the best reveal trailer tho
A WW2 game which concentrated on Battles no one knows about sure was a choice.
And people wanted BF1 levels of "feeling" (funny enough cuz BF1 was also very very not-WW1 apart from the maps and guns and the feel)
marketing team always does great its the delivery of the game and media response that can kill it
BF1 felt more like a WW2 shooter. Gear wise.
There's no authentic WW battlefield, they're all just made to feel like you're in war while adding unrealistic features becuase its a game, yet people still get angry when a BF game is unrealistic or not on par with the theme
But yeah EA fucked up advertising BFV as a WW2 shooter when they wanted to put a huge spin on it
theres not enough PTSD that my grandpa experienced!! give it to me!! 😂
Hey so is there no registration confirmation email?
They do send them, just not immediately
Oh ok. Ty
think mine was about a day or 2 on my confirmation
i signed up too early so i didnt even get one 😭
Weird take but ok
Yeah I thought that too
WW1 didnt have full auto SMGs and rifles
they wanted to make the game actually fun unlike what it would be with just standard ww1 games which is why they added all those experimental never used in ww1 weapons in the game
It'd be also really boring to have only bolt actions and shotguns
there were like 2 semi auto rifles that started entering use near the end of the war, but those never saw combat use in that war
an authentic ww1 game would just be u with a flare and a bolt action or semi auto at best
Battlefield is not a milsim
have fun with that "but i want 100 weapons day 1"
the Tommy gun didnt see action you are correct on that
Yes, im fine with what BF1 is, never had a problem. But its factually true that its not WW1 accurate haha
you're just proving the point then 😂
Villar Perosa and the German MP18 were ww1 smgs
some people here think differently lmao
Bro, i dont care what BF is or isnt...i just want good games
the whole point we're making is the BF was never about historical accuracy, yeah some guns were definitely historically accurately detailed but the game itself was never designed that way
Creative libertys are totally fine to take.
Some people actually think that battlefield has somewhat always been a realistic shooter 😂
it's always funny seeing them have an issue with realism in bfv but not bf1
True its kinda just hypocritical
BF1 realism would be getting diseases in trench warfare like Influenza, Venereal and Dysentery 
Do you guys care for an PMC group as a faction or a country like Russia, China, North Korea, etc as a faction?
Dont care, just want good maps, gear and balance
just no more Notepads 😭
Me firing an RPG at a pursuing jet: "Hmm, but would this have happened in lore?"
It’s not gonna change it’s already set stage for the campaign
PMC is probably the coolest, most varied thing they can give us. Same with NATO
No limits to what gear the sides can use
If they can make a feared, dangerous, and violent PMC group and basically do WW3 between the 2 factions (something Activision doesn’t have the balls to do) then 10/10 story and campaign.
I wish we could get CSTO but game companies don’t wanna take risks getting their games banned
How many invites they usually send out per day?
We don't know
Also most likely not daily, but sent before a session

Invites are probably sent in waves, or batches.
I doubt they are sitting there sending out X amount per day
Applied a while ago and hadn’t gotten one yet
BRICS would be nice
You and 99.9% of people 
Iirc BRICS is an economic alliance not a military one like NATO is
CSTO is basically what Russia’s version of NATO is
This is the most likely, it's not like there is one guy selecting people out of 1.5m registration.
Probably just an algorithm selecting X amount based on Y parameters, and invites sent
But it would basically just be Russia because all the rest are just former Soviet countries
They put all 1.5m on a big dartboard and throw 50 darts per day.
Sounds like a Nice job, where do I sign Up?
They use manatees to collect balls with players names.
NATO v PMC was in way earlier leaks, it won't be changed
Should just be US vrs Canada
Definitely an algorithm
And it's probs not random either
puts on tinfoil hat

XD i mean it makes sense

this is not safe space to theorize conspiracies on labs selection
why not ;_;
It'd be nice to just have a game with an actual campaign
well you are in luck
campaign is confirmed
And did they remove the cringe hero crap and return to regular soldiers?
yes
watch a couple Yt videos, there's lots of information (also playtest leaks)
neat-o
The gameplay leaks look insane for being pre-alpha.
SIgned up for lab testing when it started. Entered what was required. Haven't heard a thing since. Been playing Battlefield since 1942 release. Have had them all. crickets
Feel you. You should've atleast recieved something that you have signed up
Unlikely to, tons of people signed up and very, very few get in
I didn't bother because the labs thing is rather gate keepish. 'we want your feedback, now take a number and queue up, the line start's over there, on the other side of the planet'
Not gonna say that time played is irrelevant, but they aren’t necessarily prioritising those who have been playing for ages
Even have a couple machine to test with 2080 rtx on one 5080 on the other
Yeah no. They went out and said that it doesn't matter if you signed up first or the last minute
99.999% (quite literally that number if only a thousand were invited) did not receive an invite 
That's stupid, we've been playing this franchise longer than most people've been working at dice since the 'old guard' left during BFV and 2042
Ok boomer

I mean hell, I've a platinum tier idea for the perfect blend of arcade and 'realistic' shooter that'd be a blend of Bad Company 2's map and environmental design and destruction, BFV's building mechanics, BF1's gun handling and BF3's vehicle style.
Does make sense to bring in fresh eyes to develop onboarding and tutorialisation systems, but I would also hope the distributions is swayed more towards those who have played often.
But hey, we don’t know their algorithm for determining who gets in. For all we know, 90% of the people playing could be pre bf2 vets, 10% may be post. Or it could be 100% people who have never played bf before. Too much uncertainty to assume anything
repectfully, bf1 gunplay sucks lol
bf4/hardline's is better
BF4 suffers a tad bit from nostalgia blindness because DICE had to balance the seventh and eighth generation consoles so they were trapped in limbo on '360 but also XBOne' in terms of what they could feasibly do with design.
bf3 was my fav
BF1 was the more streamlined version of BF4's handling, that and it also helped that it got such a long support cycle and numerous quality of life updates before V came out

BF4's gunplay although has more variety in attachments and customizability, I'm talking in terms of pure handling, not in terms of tech you could add to the gun.
yeah
bf1 gunplay sucks is what i said lol
visual recoil and suppression affecting visual recoil and spread made it awful
oh and the spread system not including suppression was wacky af
Fair enough, addendum; Bad Company 2's weapon gunplay and the lack of suppression effects, sniper glint and bullet deviation
bad company 2 had bullet spread while firing....
as for the other 2, i don't know since i never played bad company 2
At the very least it was after firing for prolonged durations with lmgs and assault rifles, the MG3 with acog and Magnum Bullets was a good example of 'it's broken as hell if you know how to use it'. It was best used in short controlled bursts, like in real life for accurate streams of suppressive fire.
For instance, it had an insanely high fire rate but only 100 rounds and high recoil. It's pure skill to use. If you play the campaign you can use the MG3 with a red dot sight and get a feel for how it handles, it's a lot more realistic than the MG34 or 42 in BFV.
Bfv movement🙏
Honestly, that didn't work becuase sprint sliding didn't fit the gunplay in the slightest. If anything that should be reserved to titanfall.
Okay I need to vent for a bit... fuck all of you, because in my honest opinion, The Specialist were never a bad idea, what was a bad idea was getting rid of the Class System, The Specialist were only hated because they got rid of what made Battlefield unique, if they didn't do that, people would not be complaining about The Specialist other then there crappy in-game quotes, not to mention what could have been a cool opportunity of having returning characters as Specialist like Blackburn from BF3, or the guys from Bad Company 2, I'm only bringing this up now, because I am a little tilted that I can't play as a Specialist Robot in BF2042, and was also hoping BF2042 would bring in the mechs that would have been what led to the Mechs from BF2142, either way that's the ended of my vent fuck all of you
Cool

The mechs, and everything else from 2142 was teased in the final fronts DLC of BF4, it's nothing to do with playerbase backlash that they weren't added. That was solely the 'cod/overwatch/fortnite' pandering of the 'specialits' that no one wanted. We buy into battlefield to get away from that. It was a collective breakdown of communication and understanding on every single level of what BF players wanted. Cursing us out because you didn't get your way isn't productive.
In other words, all the precious development time and budget was wasted on skins, characters, and seasonal cosmetics instead of building upon the potential to have a kickass 'pre-sequel' to the events of 2142, where the final dlc of 2042 could've been a teaser to a 2142 remastered or revamped.
Anyways, the weapons handling of BC2 was and still is some of the best in any game I've ever played. It's the perfect blend of arcade and 'realistic' to where anyone could pick it up from cod players to arma people.
Bro whaaaaaat. Specialists are hated by like 99% of the BF community
Replacing classes is a huge chunk of the backlash, but I reckon a lot of people hated the specialist characters too
Ignore it, it's ragebait.
Makes sense
Especially as it felt like their only purpose was to sell cosmetics
felt like? bro it is
Like shit I've no arguments with gun camos but when it's attack of the clones and you want to know who to shoot, in the time it takes for the jank ass engine to render the blue/green dot you're already sniped
2042 beta where nobody could tell friend from foe
beta? I played it the other day and it still sucked ass like that.
I'm saying the Specialist were only hated because they got rid of what made Battlefield unique, if they just started with what we ended up with, no one would had been complaining about what happen at the beginning
🇶 spam
True xD
Ur opinion is not relevant

Specialists ruined battlefield’s identity
that one they could have done what Rainbow Six Siege did
The quips and personality didn't go down well either. Even if there were classes on launch, I doubt people would have liked it
of course that would have require more development
Let's not sidetrack fellas, we're here to help give feedback. Not infight with trolls
I don't think heroes and personality can really work well when you got 128 players on the map
I swear if DICE takes in these guys as to give feedback for the next game it’s cooked 😂

Maybe a small quip here or there on occasion would've been more better like in BF4 or 1 'good shot lad!' or 'got that b! tch, nice shot!'
Are they bringing back the pilot/tanker class next game?
doubt it
I do miss BF3 quips they felt so reall
The quips were so cringe man 
2042*
I mean hell it could've worked if it wasn't bargin bin batman or the chick with the tail of a plain on her face
*plane
Good thing they pretty much removed them
You’re not getting away with your shit takes 😭
Why couldn't we just play as the npc fill-in characters
Damn, thats upsetting
Oh yeah the bots loool
that's all they had to do, swap out the hero crap, give us regular soldiers and make the dlc paid content so that way they wouldn't need to rely on the whales buying all the microtransactions to keep the doors open but instead make genuine content drops like in BF1, 4, HL, and 3
premium is never coming back 
hope yall know that
Dlc premium model would never work in current year
Sadly we're never getting DLC's again 😦
2042 was supposed to be an BR
THIS!!
It's crap on all fronts, they waste time and manpower to develop shit we usually don't want instead of making the game better or expanding with new game modes/ideas. That in turn leads to a loss of money yet again because we're not cod people, we buy into quality game modes, map expansions and the like.
The "lore" behind 2042's failure is so important to take into consideration
if by 'BR" you mean brainrot then yes
AHAHHAHA
Honestly it's Biblical, sort of like a golden bull type. worshiping contemporary value rather than true sustinence in wuality and merit.
Why do you think they removed the 4 classes and replaced it with specialists? Why do you think there was no campaign? Why do you think the maps were so terrible?
Exactly
I think they didn't think at all.
Barren wastelands maps lol
Hell YarnHub of all people stand a good chance at replacing Battlefield, they got ex-EA and Sony developers on their teams. AND they're opening up the company to the stockmarket too.
no I am looking back at what could have been best for BF2042 at the time, but now we are on to BF6, and all I can suggest is if BF6 has a terrible launch day for the third time in a row, give the devs proper feedback to improve the game, instead of saying give up or move on to the next one, if there is a next one, a game can break but it isn't permanent
There was no hope for 2042 anyways so it didn't matter
And let me remind you that Lars Gustavsson was the director for 2042 😭
By the time they released it, it wasn't even close to finished
This is what BFV could've been, and since Yarnhub animates in Unreal and make all their in-video assets in house and with insane detail they already have a vast backlog of content to work withhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b8ChW8zkxns&pp=ygUHeWFybmh1Yg%3D%3D
Imagine lanching a ship without a rudder
No wait, I don't need to. 2042's right there
Imagine not having a scoreboard on launch
xD
"Brutal expecations" btw
That guy is still in the feedback section for the next game
Imagine not having a server browser to hide the low playercounts
How tf you went from BC2/BF3/BF1 to 2042? I’m glad that he and the rest of the old leadership got fired
True
Imagine making the portal mode fucking useless in-house and subsidising more than two thirds of its functionality to yet another fucking website instead of having it all accessible in-game like the platoon emblem creator
Pride, hubris and inability to properly adapt, same as the Roma, Byzantine and Ottoman empire
Portal 2.0 incoming btw 👀
we never even had a 1.0, it was .0000000001.0 at best
Hahahah so true
We have to all be cautious for the next game, they have to show us with gameplay and results.
But... we.. already saw it?
nothing's been added at all since launch and the downgrade of the sound design is horrible, they're literally the same fucking company! How can they not pull original assets from their files and just upscale them or something or fucking hell better yet, why not decompress the audio so it sounds more realistic
That was a pre alpha, it’s not the final build
Imagine a BC2 house collapsing with the orignal art style and uncompressed sound effects.
portal shouldn't be a way to bring old content from old games imho 
all content should be in the main game no matter what
portal should just be the customization thingy on the site and server browser/rental/borrowing thing they did for 2042
"Decompress the audio so it sounds more realistic" hahahahaha
they had to compress audio back then because of how much space it still took up
And it was confidence inspiring imho
Ye
Good ol' MP3, I hope the next one has FLAC
I've to update the craptop, catch y'all later. have a good one tiger dude
The sound design sounded amazing in the leaks tho
👋
Things are subjective to change in a pre alpha, so don’t get your hopes up yet until you and me play the beta.
Oh for sure. But as a base and first impressions I am really impressed
And there were many placeholders which is good. It means they are making everything from the ground up
I hope it’s good cause this is their last shot
I don’t think they can take anymore flops after that
*After 2042
Actual last shot
It seems they've had a much bigger budget for this so if it flops. BF as a franchise is dead
i completlyy agree with this

I mean they had 4 years for this game and it’s after Covid so if this launch is terrible and has minimal content it’s joever.
Covid REALLY messed up 2042's development
i'm saying in general. Portal should not have content that is only in portal. Everything should be available in the MP and the Portal game editor/"programming" and server "borrowing" should be the only things in Portal 2.0
As well as a shitty lead that didn't make the right decisions
There are so many reasons why and I think I told you to watch that "Battlefailed 2042" video right?
Or maybe that wasn't you
Yes I did
Yee
It was sad

Oh like all the maps and weapons etc?
yes
there should not be portal specific stuff, that's only available in portal
Well as for maps it makes sense but progression should still be shared across
So like different factions, maps, weapons etc?
In the base game
i'm saying that portal should not have content from old games (they never translate well into the new engine anyway, i.e. bc2 and bf3 stuff in 2042 portal)
use the time and resources to add to the main MP
portal should only be the editor/website thingy and server browser
that's it
True. But as for portal it should be more of an incentive to add old BF maps and weapons into the main game but as a seperate server browser or playlist so it doesn't have to blend into the main game
Well apparently a map editor is gonna be in portal 2.0 so that could be included
AI map generator
well yeah, that's fine, but like content (guns and maps and vehicles) should not be separated
Thats gonna be fire
It should, because it wont fit into the campaign or time period of the main game
I don't really wanna get killed by a WW2 outfit wearing soldier running around with an STG
that's why i said
"use time and resources to add to the main MP instead" 
We don't know how they are going to integrate the new portal tho
So it could be totally different from 2042's portal
Is there even a new version of portal?
Would be a shame for them to put all this work into the editor and then just ditch it
What
Whaaat
I don’t quite see any possible resemblance but ok
How would that work
That sounds like straight 🐂💩
So… a server browser?
that seems like an ultra stretch
Mini game hub lol
Link it
From where?
Source: trust me bro
A guy had a comment on a video since september last year and he stated that he saw "MP, Portal and regrettably BR"
He said
i have a feeling "inspired by GTA online" is a stretch 
It’s obviously not gonna be exactly inspired by it, but they’re considering it turning into a mini game hub.
Can you clarify what you mean by a "mini game hub"
I am a bit confused
Like the menus for selecting servers/maps
personally 
it doesn't seem like a good idea to make it into a "mini game hub"
it makes it too much like fortnite's whatever it is
when next playtest
we not know
im feining for more
Could be tomorrow, could be next month we don't know
I mean if someone knows they wont say it anyways 
unless someone posts it in here anyways while forgetting to read the email fully 

Already happened I think lol
Pretty sure somone leaked an email some time ago
Minecraft
It’s gonna be a while I think
What is gonna be a while?
seen one on twitter for the first test 
like bruh
READ the EMAIL 
Man people are stoopid
They are probably doing it regularly tho
Maybe
For that sweet sweet feedback
it better not be a long while 
defeats the purpose of "let's make battlefield great together"
anywho, me go watch HDR YT, cuz colors on OLED pwetty
don't run more than 70 brightness 
but minecraft with shaders and texture pack are gorgeous
I have an Odyssey G9 OLED btw 
Are you guys are alright with portal becoming a mini game hub?
i got the MSI360Hz oled (271qrx)
Ooh nice
i think it's too much chasing trends (trying to follow fortnite and gta online) and could hinder portal (yet again)
yes, it's very nice
I don't really care, as long as its good
I really hate that the G9 is not DP 2.1
So fckn not future proof
neither is the msi 
but has hdmi 2.1 at least
I mean those are the two most popular games ever
Ye using that rn
I hope that we can make our own factions tho 🔥
But remember what happens when DICE is chasing trends 
i'm using display port, no dsc, because i don't really need 360hz tbf, so i take the 120hz loss for HDR instead
As long it’s only with portal then its fine
But is DSC really that noticeable?
not really afaik, but no HDR when it's enabled
Oh yeah nvm
Wait what
I have HDR with my HDMI 2.1 as well as 240hz
With HDMI compression stuff
yeah, you can do 240hz with HDR on hdmi 2.1 and display port 1.4a, but if you want 360hz, you gotta give up hdr
But I have much more pixels to push
Wtf ok then
Is your panel gen2 or gen3 QD-OLED?
idk. for me:
DSC on: 1440p, 360hz, no hdr on both ports
DSC off: 1440p, 240Hz, hdr on both ports
i didn't know 
i just got the recommendation asking Bruhskey
he said the asus 480hz is best, but that the msi is top 3 or 5 (i don't remember exactly)
and to be fair
480hz is a crazy amount in general for me
240hz will be fine as long i get pwetty colors while playing
2042 actually looks good compared to an IPS 
Have you done the HDR calibration btw?
You can download the tool from microsoft store if not
it's calibrated out of the box, but did the "best settings" stuff from monitors unboxed
Hahah yeah doesn't change much
I actually just disabled w11 hdr
It looks better using monitor settings than w11 settings
Man I know this is a mutual feeling for many but I wish I was in the battlefield labs alpha right now
I'm in OCE so i doubt I'll ever get an invite
We will get tests eventually
~I know Arial Combat in BF3 and BF4 were amazing, I feel as though DICE should take inspiration from the Ace Combat Series and let players go nuts with Jet combat~ d(-v-
I’ve been playing Battlefield for a decade and I still struggle to fly a jet
I can hold my own, well enough to quickly smack the attack jet farming our spawn
But if he's got a sweat in the stealth jet protecting him, gg
hoping for another labs blog today
this poster is insane
Would've happened like 40 minutes ago
Bf2042 jets are easier than bf3 jets
If you struggle with the current jets
You can't fly bf3 jets
I hope jets dont become a thing in the new game. They are too arcady for my liking and maps need be huge as well. Just focus on ifv and tanks with a little bird or attack chopper. Smaller scale, tighter maps like bc2.
So far the game looks fantastic. Combat looks more grounded with tight combat and the map reminds of grand bazaar.
my brother used to be an infantry player… then he got one kill in a jet and was never on foot again unless he could make an emergency landing to repair
but nevertheless jets gotta stay theyre only a nuisance usually when youre actively fighting them from my experience from all the past bfs (except 1) jets/planes werent usually an issue aslong as you werent in the air or on the AA
bf1 they were a nuisance on infantry too but thats what they were designed for
That can't be true as it works for me, i have the same monitor and HDR does work with DSC enabled on DP
Is there any M&K footage leaked yet? was there even playtest on PC or is everybody playing on controller?
what I'm just saying, people think Battlefield jets are too arcady, they have not experience what true Arcade Jet Combat is (<v<;
But even the ac shadows creator demo had everyone on controller even though mouse was an option. I guess the ratio of controller to mouse is just that high
Although I do wonder what the performance is like in game
I'll never get it why anyone would prefer controller over mouse (on PC)
No idea either
But then again I’ve never once held one so I wouldn’t even consider it
fair enough
I prefer Mouse and Keyboard for FPS, controller is useful for game like Elden Ring
Even then I feel it’s benefits are minor
In the end it’s down to preference, but still surprised nobody else in the test has used them
don't like crossplay in FPS games. it's impossible to balance properly and will always be unfair for either mk or controller players.
controller support on PC yes, but w/o aimassist whatsoever
Does anyone know why i dont see battlefield playtest on ea battlelabs ?
It says that there is no playtests
that's normal. only way to tell if you are in is the direct notification via mail.
@cyan swallow in the same boat the peeps that fly jets extremely well have to be using 70% of their brain...lol
Anyone get the test on pc? Or its only console
Both
When does the testing go live?
Nobody knows
do u think it would be possible to have helictoper crashes or plane crashes like in the BF5 trailer where the plane crashes and the pilot gets out of the plane moments like that but in multiplayer cinematic crashes
i have always wanted that
Crash landings were removed which is kinda sad.
I do feel there's a real chance of anything happening
If you’re American
you don't like pi?

no test this weekend?
we don't know
I hope to see Flags and ONLY borderlines on minimap, thats one of few things thats put me off
wouldn't be surprised if it's a toggle setting tbh
yeah optional borderlines to toggle but I have not seen flags so hope they bring them back
I would if it was actually pi day but it's 14/3
smh
hey, where can i sign up for batllefield lab?
ea playtest site

thank you
so i registered, now i just have to wait for an email?
yeah, you'll get a an email for registering at the site first, though i had to wait a while for mine 🙂
and when you get picked for actual testing you will get another one
i see too people complaining about how the game is too fast on the reddit
like go play squad if you want it to be slow
i left the battlefield subreddit because of that
so many crybabies ever since 2042
fr
nothing is good enough and it's just a cesspit of negativity
Any info as to when the next playtest will launch?
no
Ok thanks
Nobody has used any kind of movement in any gameplay I’ve seen, not even the stuff listed on the movement blog as being confirmed features
All we’ve seen are people running and walking, if people have a problem with that then idk
they don't know what they want anymore
wasn't it 2042 where people were complaining about movement speed, but it turns out it's barely faster than bf4 or something lol
the ppl saying its too fast are just bad
50% of the people playing probably haven’t used anything more than a jump in bf anyways
True
They just look at the animation for sprinting and use that to deduce whether it’s a cod game or some other bs
Not the actual extent of the systems and why they are made the way they are
People already complaining about a slide and how its "CoD shit" 
There a very shitty slide into a jump on one of the clips
Shitty attempt*
21st March
Basic skill issue of the BF Community
Hopefully a invite will show up in my inbox
when ? 😄
Whenever they decide to send invites
What's something everyone is looking forward to? Me personally I'd love to see battle chatter similar to BF3 or BF4? Just makes the game feel more alive imo.
I want radio chatter from bf4 and the battle sounds of 1 like its so cool hearing gunfights and people screaming when dying it just added depth
i would also love that back in the game. i still checking my stats when i play lol good times
And everything was chaotic
fishing minigame
Lots of Easter eggs
If I don't see a dinosaur statue somewhere I'm gonna be so sad lol
i hope the make also a Vientma Mod at some point with new BF. I kinda miss and enjoyed playing BC2 normal and vientam mob
Less gadgets that just do most of the work for you
Portal should come back what do u guys think
The editor definitely
It’s just people lacked the imagination to fill it with new modes, and their restraint on creativity with exp cuts absolutely ruined it
And if they add AI make them good
I feel like the imagination is definitely out there, I feel like it was more so how unprovoked creators were to even make things for 2042 because of well, obvious reasons
They should expand onto portal
Instead of making your own gamemodes they should give modding material to like modify in game things
Like physics and stuff
I wish there was like a joint squad option where you can expand the amount of people in the squad.
I hate it when you join a game and it's full of locked squads.
they gotta make the gameplay heavy first if you know what i mean
battlefield community when they see someone slide: 😡 😡 😡 😡
hey, has anyone seen issues where the playtest sign in site loops after accepting T&C?
I would love to see fortification from bf5
Fortifications would be dope to see from bf5. Maybe expand on it too by making squad points be able to put down sturdier fortifications or something?
I agree it would make it more rewarding
Portal is coming back
@quick merlinwhere did you get the info ?
Several posts on Reddit.
sorry, forgot to tag you on my answer.
I hope battlefield 6 would add MCX XM7, MCX Virtus, VHS-D2 & Hk433 in their game & of course the return of the M4a1
We have seen the M4A1 already, so its there
I always love guns and wanted to testing them out before join any battle...guns is all I knew in my life since bad company 1
Hk433 is there as well
Thank you guys I just hope that MCX Spear, HVS-D2 and MCX Virtus will come soon
Now hear me out if there is one thing I want Battlefield to do, it is something that no other FPS games has ever done before, give us the option to have the SPAZ-12 that can fold and unfold the stock, I have not once played an FPS, that has given us that option, it is usually one or the other
They were already in 2042, I think they will also be in BF6
most likely yeah
Even if not during the launch I'm sure they will come with a season
..... but why
what would the purpose be
Faster ADS strafe speed I guess?
having played BF2042 after a while I realized that the so called "classes" from BF6 are literally the BF2042 ones
which is absolute ass
maybe?
but then some guns would need gimmicks like that other than the spas
BF6 classes are worse 
They arent lmao
Can we talk about leeks btw? I was muted for a week so I'm not sure
I don't want to be muted or banned again
yes
The MP5 is another one that does that
Assault gets the stimthing
I wish we can have that system ware we can change our soldier's uniform just like bf3 & bf4
Lol 
Yeah totally the same...2 gadgets are similar, so it must be!!!!!!!!
just no clips/links and no theorizing on stuff based on leaks
and anything under discretion of the mod team
I might be thinking the MP5 or UMP-45 that folds
..... ok?
Support being medic and ammo crate is okay, I have no idea why people hate that and not 6-7 different passives and ultis they have
it's not tho
I just hate assault being basically the roleless class
there is a role
Kill everything that moves 
Assault is fragger
their class gadget is the defib, they have a support crate thats both ammo and HP...ammo is resupplied completely differently now. If you arent going to actually use your head when looking at things, maybe its best you not discuss leaks.
are we going to have one of those adrenaline shots back just like bad company 1
we got med pens from 2042 as assault class gadget
It’s not okay, it destroys the squad teamwork when it comes to the medic having the ammo crate
I'm not even discussing leaks
No one cares about teamwork in BF 
???
How are you suppose to inject yourself when your health is very low
Combining both is in fact beneficial because you won't have to search for a guy with an ammo crate or a med crate
WTF are you talking about then? lol
About what people have said
so even worse, great lol
Battlefield: Chinese Whispers
well that and grenade launchers
So was voice chat yet people wanted it in BF2042
haven't heard or seen any mentions of defibs for the assault
that's because that's part of support class
assault is straight up assault
kill everything that moves, frag out
People were having issues with not receiving health/ammo since BF3
Combining both is a good thing imo
maybe, but that's before discord was available on consoles as well
no one uses in game voip since then 
see
No one used VOIP in BF3, 4, 1 or V either
wait you were talking about support
Next BF should have proximity voip imo 
um, yeah
then there was just a communication issue woops
assault: anti infantry
engi: anti vehicle/repair vehicles
support: ammo and health
recon: camping
that's the classes for this game
They should replace recon gadget, TUGS ain't it, spawn beacon should be their mandatory gadget
I'd still prefer ammo / health to be separate classes but oh well
true
hm?
Since BF3 I have only seen 2 people use ingame voice chat, it BF3 on Console and BF2042
whats the reason for that?
so you can only choose one gadget?
You have 1 class gadget, then 2 chosen gadgets
two gadgets, plus the class gadget which cannot be changed
so 2 choices + 1 mandatory
I just think everyone that has an lmg is going to take an ammo crate rather than a health crate
oh nice nice
thats not a reson for wanting ammo to be on another class tho
engi's have stinger (gross), at4, at mine, rpg, javelin (gross), slams, and something else I can't tell what it is
no, I just want the health one on a different class
Why?
the reason is probably to prevent choosing support as the "ultimate" assault class
unlimited ammo and meds + gun = BRRRRR
It provide choices, Medic heals but needs ammo, while Support has Ammo but when hurt needs healing
I just prefer the BF3 / BF4 system, with assault being the medic
But thats a system of co-dependence, not synergy or teamwork
even if they don't actively want to heal, they have the crate that they can drop, even if it's just for healing themselves, it's still there and others can heal from it
Medics were OP in BF3-4-V-1 for a reason
Assault medics are too self sufficient
The resupply loop is also totally different now. You dont instantly get ammo as soon as you step on a supply crate, each piece of equipment has a timer you need to wait for, when that timer is reached...you get some of that equipments ammo back
oooooooo
assist as kill is coming back? noice
man I just want to play it 😔
Idk to be honest. In my mind, giving them tugs could theoretically help push them closer to where the action actually is, but spawn beacons being mandatory could promote just sitting off in the middle of nowhere and just reappearing there when you die
also how do you even know if you get access, an email?
also true
Really in BF3 it was the Engineer class that was OP because they had the Carbine weapons
yes
BF3 assault was the OP class by far. All the best weapons were ARs
AN94 and AEK says hi
wasn't the m16a3 the more op and not the aek?
aek was strong af in bf4
That was BF4 where the Assault Class that was OP
the m16a3 on bf3 was incredibly OP
AEK was always strong
I feel it was the only gun that actually landed hits
AN94 was OP
any class that has meds is OP 
Yeah, 1/3 of the players plays as Falck in 2042 too
falck + pp2k + redacted = 🧑🌾
Give me T1 skins for portal guns @€A 😭
More black, red and gold skins, wooo
Gives me a reason to grind them
oh yeah
assault gets dragons breath underbarrel

I always found it super lame that all T1 skins are the same theme...and not a special skin for each weapon
it been awhile since I played BF3, all I remember was people jump into the Engineer Class because of that weapon exclusivity, it was the whole reason Engineer end up with the SMG in BF4
DICE, gimme animated camo for T1 next game 
I think it's super lame it's just 2 skins for mastery and not like 5-10 skins
Enginner getting carbines, and SMG being all class would make a lot more sense.
BF3-4's meta doesn't matter that much anyways tbh, everything has fast TTK
People used assault because of heals
Nearly everyone went engineer anyways because vehicles were everywhere
I like BF1 because of that, everyone has some sort of AT and then vehicles in general are much better balanced
everyone getting AT in a modern setting is incredibly crap tho. (See 2042 for reference)
I was actually thinking they should have the Engineer Exclusive to the Shotgun and the Assault/Medic Exclusive to the DMR the two least used weapon classes in the Battlefield series
Balance wise, there is no real reason to make Shotguns, or DMRs exclusive to one class. The are just similar weapons at the opposite end of their spectrums
The Assault Rifle, the Carbine and the SMG should just be access to every Class
at that point just give everyone everything
Youll have an incredibly boring game meta if you do this
ARs to assault, SMGs to engi, LMGs to support, Snipers to Recon
everything else is open 🤷♂️
So BF4 method
SMG to engineer doesnt really make much sense to me. It never made sense in BF4 either
SMGs should be universal imo
Like if you add a CQC map...why would you have your SMGs be on engineers
Give them Carbines or LMGs
LMGs if you want them to be high DPS for high time, or carbines if you want them to have similar, but lower DPS potential to assault. Engineer are frontlines soldiers along with assault afterall
I feel lmgs works pretty well
if you think about the intended ranges for weapons, that puts them a little further back at about the mid point, able then to watch flanks and be mid range assists focusing on taking out vehicles
I feel like this conversation is what led to every Class in BF2042 having access to every weapons
LMGs probably FEEL like a better fit for Support tho.
I don't like the idea
ultimately though, I still enjoy no restrictions. Sure it's got some downsides, but I can't disregard how fun cqc recon is
I hate it
Maps like redacted bring my issues with it to the forefront. You have a bunch of differing classes, all with different gadgets and utility, but everyone using the same 2-4 weapons. Incredibly boring
yeah I can definitely see and accept it's faults
I just see it as i'll take whatever they decide to do as there are pros and cons to both approaches
This might be a unpopular opinion BF6 should never have any maps that are like Operation Metro/ Operation Lockout
It should have maps like that, 100%
what it needs is a server browser / map selector so you can avoid them if you want 
this
Its nice to have different types of games, on different types of maps to break up the flow.
No it should, just not designed in the way those two maps are
Server browser for sure. But I think a lot of players issues would also be solved with infinitely running/looping map rotations. This 2042 thing of returning to menu after each game should never return
If a player wants to leave the game and return to menus...they are quite capable of doing that themself
If Server Browser do come back, I don’t know if possible at least provide an automatic random player team switch at the end of each match, maybe it could help make one sided matches be less likely
Would be nice yeah. They at least re-added manual team swap in portal for 2042
Yeah. Persistent servers are necessary alongside a server browser
I have returned frosted flake man
There was manual team change in BFV too
At least on console
Just needed to do it differently that previous installments
If an Server Browser doesn’t come back then that also means SBMM will be present.
Wonder when the next test is?
If There is SBMM, the next Battlefield Will fail, as simple as that
Nobody knows. Stay tuned for the next blog
If SBMM is present it’s over for casual FPS
Pretty much
I'm so fed Up with Games were an algorithm decides what kind of experience I have that day and if I'll get shit on just because I was good the previous day
Or the other way around. Knowing that after a few atrocious rounds, the game will give some crumbs to continue playing
Exactly battlefield is the last stand for casual gaming
If I’m going to playtest, do I have to download something in order to play?
Yes
As in all software, you will most likely need to download something
No man I love sitting through a Haven queue just to get kicked out, sit in queue and get Haven a second time in a row 
Screw redacted give me stadium back to back so I can have games end in 3 minutes
I love spawning in to a 50-650 match
They should bring ticket counter from battlelog back
Battlelog allowed you to see tickets in a server so you were deciding if you should join or not
I've spawned into the end match screen so many times in 2042
They should also bring back map voting from BF1 back
Map voting if we don't have a server browser is fucking ESSENTIAL
BF1 had both 
Yeah but BF1 also poo poo stinky
Doesn't mean it doesn't have it's merits
I like BF1 TTK and server/map voting options
BF1 also had loadouts for classes which is cool
BF1 is still a masterpiece
Although I despise it’s movement
movement for new battlefield is soo good
No slide cancelling, no edgeboosting, no bhopping = no buy
you will still buy it
Sounds like a skill issue
only way to not have sbmm is if they have servers run by the community and a server browser
BF3/4 had Bhopping
bf2 had og bunny hop
BF1 was amazing. Sure it had flaws like all BFs, but it was one of the greatest no doubt
And the best launch of a BF since BF3
Battlefield is not Squad or ARMA or any realistic milsim shooter.
the new game needs lots of maps and remakes of older maps
Insert meme: If the milsim crowd could Read, they'd be really upset
im worried that they are gonna listen to the cod/milsim crowd
I want Ziba Tower and Donya Fortress back
They truly believe that Battlefield has always been a milsim 😂
supposedly portal is coming back to the new game, I would like to see them bring back every map from every bf game lol
2042 had 2 maps from 3 games each I wouldn't bet on that 🤣
the only time it ever came close to a milsim was when bf2 and 1942 had project reality
I don't think Zampella will listen to Them tbh
And Forgotten Hope to an extent
yeah that too
but it merged with project realirt
reality
project reality turned into squad, hell let loose and squad 44
If they do game is dead in less than an month after release
i wouldnt mind seeing infantry focused maps without tanks and choppers or having the ability to run servers and turn off vehicles
Don't underestimate EA's ability to speedrun the death of franchises
what made the refractor bf games so much fun was the sandbox feel and openness of the maps
the commander assets you could destroy in the enemy main bases felt like secondary objectives
but they listened to people complaining about base camping so they took that out
I wish that made a come back
with a commader role that was physically in the server like in bf2 and 2142
Commader shouldn't come back imo, squad leaders should be mini commanders like BFV instead
The entire bf community is gonna torch you for this
Team with a good commander was going to win 90% of the time
commanders could control uav arty suppliy and vehicle drops
UAV, CUAV spam, sending rockets when they can
aswell the squadleader and squads got extra points for following orders
but what made that feature so good in bf2 and 2142 compared to bf4 was the fact that you could destroy the assets and they had to be repaired by an engineer
or supply box
I will probably see hate for this aswell but I want to see more classes
They need to bring back naval combat
🥱
and have a squad lock option for vehicles
Not to change the subject, if there are any Battlefield devs here, have the BF3 Canadian server shutdown? Because I can no longer access BF3 on PC anymore
DICE BRING BACK NAVAL COMBAT
fortifications need to come back aswell
They should bring back CQC first imo
there's only one NA server from TBG
Have you seen the leaked map? That is clearly CQC.
No like I can’t even access the Campaign it is telling me I need to have a license to access BF3
2042 didn't had Redacted until like 2 years after it's release
oh?
that's a bug, how to fix? i forget
That dumbass license shit i think
They didn't like people reselling their games so they wanted them to buy an activation code.
I'm not sure if bf3 had it but I know a few around that era.
Me personally I like and dislike infantry only maps
I know what you are talking about, it was the stupid online pass
You should be able to download it for free???
Yeah
That's the only thing that makes sense in this
i like a mix of infantry and vehicles lol
but vehicles do get tiring
so having infantry only maps is good too
It's more of an urban map than CQC
when i ran my bfv servers i did 2 maps infantry 2 maps vehicles and kept it on a rotation
Have maps more like caspian border, Zavod 311, Grand Bazaar.
Yea but it also have elements of an CQC map
can you tell me where I can download the Battlefield Labs beta version?
I want to play and test.
You sign up on https://www.ea.com/games/battlefield/battlefield-labs, wait for the confirmation email, and then wait for an invite email
they explain it to you when you register if you read the disclaimer
No F**K metro and Locker, don’t get me wrong I am okay with infantry only maps, but map layout like metro and lockers I hate
I tried
I think Redacted is a good compromise without being too meat grinder like Metro/Locker
It'd honestly probably play even better without specialist gadgets like airburst, scatter, etc.
Redacted is easily one of the best maps in 2042, it's really well-done
I mean it's not hard to be the best map when all the maps in 2042 are bad at best.
Spearhead, Haven, Orbital, and Exposure are pretty good imo
But yea most of the map pool is rather meh
Honestly even from BF4/V map pool I think Redacted plays very well.
orbital is a stretch, even after the reworks
but redacted is very solid
Oh I like Reclaimed as well
I personally like it
I feel the vehicle portion of it is incredibly bland, and the southern points are so isolated and forgettable. It's cool when the tornado rolls through, but besides that, it feels very much like a worse version of that one port map I forgot the name of
Manifest, it feels like a weaker Manifest
Is it too late to get in for the next playtest?
Would love to see a outpost type game mode in BF6 like in bf5 as long as it's reworked
DICE, please bring the teamplay back
or do something to insentivise players to be more of a teamplayer
2042 is full of so many lonewolves
Why rely on randos when they can barely fight back.
The squad call in system at least encouraged squadplay
Play strong enough and you'll need less support. Self sufficiency is a skill in of itself that benefits the team.
Can someone tell why in the footage released all the scopes when scoped look like they're 3 feet away ?
battlefield is not about being a one man army
Instructions unclear, fragged out anyways.
team still probably lost because they've no clue what to do
Because that's their fault if they have clue what to do
BF has the tools to assist teammates with ammo, meds, and others
But if they're clueless and looking at walls, then it doesn't matter
My 11% higher winrate seems to indicate otherwise
#screenshots-and-clips message
Perfect example
Hard carry player you just cannot understand their methods
No female voice overs angry marines screaming at me thanks
Angry women shouting reminds you too much of your mom telling you to clean your room and get a job at 40 years of age?
To be fair there's more work to get into it but the fact you can drag bodies is genuinely good.
You can be supportive by killing people and keeping your team safe.

Is there any europe pc testing i was in the cue day 1 for 2 and a half hours 🤔
That's it? I was queued for over 12
i hope they will remove tac run and change the weapon animation
cuz the weapon animation looks like more cod
thanos snapped
Kaboom
What tha mean
You should maybe read the whole email...
There's probably something it's saying about certains actions you're NOT supposed to do 
Like the sign in? For me the sign in on the website (the “Inspire the future of play” one) just refreshes it
Yeah, the sign-in and log-in buttons on that site
Ok so im not going crazy haha, thought i was banned from them even though I did not do anything
I wanted to go and edit my preferences and just see if anything changed and take a glance at the skate stuff, but I couldn't get in
I joined this server specifically to check in on this issue LOL
Classic EA 

Same boat
I wouldn't label them anything like that
I earned myself a timeout by labeling them something similar
This is the internet, couldn't care less
I'm just saying, if you want to talk on this server then just don't do it
You are a joke correct?
Quickest block in recording history.
Yeah same for me, I was in contact with support earlier so they are going to look at it
Super wierd tbh, so I can’t fill out the form to confirm that I want to playtest😭
Lol
I hope a new wave comes soon I check my email inbox multiple times a day 😂
But do people do have the same issue as me with the login for the playtest website?
whats the problem?
Can’t fillout the form I need to fill out to be in a playtest session😭
Redirects me to ea playtest website. But all the sign in buttons just refresh the page so I can’t access anything and actually confirm that I want to be in the playtest
shit
Yeahhh….
Glad I'm not the only one with that problem, Google is saying "site not secure" when I was on it 6 hours ago and "sign in" redirects me to the homepage and only refreshes.
Yeah same here. Tried troubleshooting for an hour with support but nothing worked. He said he was going to forward the issue so that it can be resolved. So we will just have to hope for the best🙏🏼
yeah sign in is fucked
Survey isn’t necessary to enter however
Can someone send the link?
Says in my email that if left incomplete (the survey) then you won’t gain access to play
For the playtest website?
Yes
Cause every time I try, I get redirected to the EA Playtester site. It’s nice that I got the Skate playtest, but there’s nothing about battlefield there
Aw damn, but are you able to login and all of that? Make it past the sign up for playtest screen?
LMFAO I WAS PULLING OUT MY HAIR TRYING TO SIGN UP, nice to know its not a me problem 😭 i was goin crazy
Hmmm, yeah me and some others above like alex can’t even make it past that initial page. Every time we login it just refreshes
And here another one lol
Welcome to the club
Oooohhh fuck
Same
I did it a few days ago maybe the servers are overloaded
Perhaps those with this problem can create a ticket to let it be known that several people have this issue?
Perhaps yeah
Just let us play 😭
like i prob wont get in but the fact that i know i dont have a shot att all bec i cant sign in is making me depressed low key
u miss 100% of the shots you dont take, and i cant take a shot bec i dont even have a ball 
ill take what i can get ✂️
😄
🫵 
Guys are brave lol I’m sure it’s still nda
what u mean
The ea playtest site is unsafe to use
Guess I got a trojan in my computer
@lyric thistle Good morning, David! Is there a possibility in the future of further improving the server tickrate to 90Hz or even 120Hz, as we did in BF4 and BF1 Incursions?
I remember those servers were as smooth as butter, and at the same time the phrase "How did he kill me if he was hidden behind the wall" stopped being said.
You know you can mitigate issues by making better client server engineering decisions rather than simply increasing tikrate which would literally double the costs lol
That's not the case, my friend. The higher the server tickrate, the faster the information reaches our computers and therefore the level or reaction/shooting time is much better, it feels much better.
You can have a NASA connection, or 5 ping, but if the server is not good, the sensation will not be good enough either, obviously having 5 ping is much better than 35-40 as the average.
And this leads to another major improvement: there should be more official servers hosted in more areas of Europe, for example in Spain, and we would go from having a ping of 40 to a maximum of 5, and at the same time other servers would be decongested.
I'd prefer them implement anti clan stacking on their servers than 120hz tbh.
Playtest page is back up but no new tests
Does that mean the next round hasn’t opened up for signup or did I miss it?
Would stop certain Spanish clans from 20 man stacking for ez wins. 😏
The tests don’t appear on that list
Where do they?
The ideal is:
-90 or 120hz tickrate servers on the Portal, with an extra charge for this server quality.
-More servers spread across continents to significantly improve ping.
-Good anti-cheat system.
-Spectator mode.
With this, the issue of cheaters would be much easier to identify and eradicate, while also allowing us to stream matches, and everything would be much more fun.
BF is a game to play with friends or a team, not to play alone, it is a clear option, but it is another world, the ideal is to play with your team, and if you get together 20 or 30, then better, but that is difficult, and if it happens, you can play matches.
It’s just an email that’s sent to you, you sign up on the bf labs site and that’s it
Battlefield labs just takes me to the play testing site
And I remember there being a labs signup before unless it was one signup for all future tests
It will do after you’ve signed up once
Yeah, I don’t get it. I can’t see the Battlefield sign up anywhere
Maybe I did it already I don’t know but it doesn’t say anything on the page about whether I’ve already done it it just says ‚playtest in progress,’ and there I can only sign up for Skate
Na, optimizing for one standard is best. 60hz for everything. Makes bugs easier to track, and less variance between occurance reports.
They will implement SBMM anyways 
Why can’t we just get ranked sbmm and unranked modes
One for dedicated competitive play
One for general play with relatively well paired opponents
And one with no skill consideration
Those who want to excel can play ranked
Those who are new can play sbmm based
And those who want a variety of enemy skill levels can play General/ping based
That’s how I’d do it
@feral garden Now in 2042 you don't know if you're playing against 20 people from the same team on their own discord or not... there are many players who are from the same community but don't want to or the tag doesn't fit in their origin name... and you're playing against them anyway... so it's an excuse... and if you don't dare to play like that... you can change servers and that's it.
There are players who like these challenges, others don't, but we mustn't deprive anyone of that, they should always be able to choose, and not impose.
60 HZ is such an upgrade no wonder why they don't want to have persistent servers.
Cause for context.
it costs a lot.
BF doesn't fit into competitive ranked play anyways, maybe if they introduce a 5v5 rush mode or something
Competitive attack helicopter vs attack helicopter could work 😂
Weren't BF4, 1, V servers also 60 hz?
Two other features that should be included:
- Option to change teams
- Vote map
Map voting and server browser should return imo
Team changing I don't care
People will abuse it to get high WL ratios
It was a casual response stating an opinion. There is no need to be so triggered. It's not that deep.
You can change teams, which is very useful when playing with friends or organizing matches between communities.
But yeah in general I think SBMM (in a pure non algorithmic form unlike cod and possibly others) is a great option to have especially for new players or for average players who keep getting sweated on by the top people in normal matches
As a choice that is
SBMM won't be a choice if they add it
Easier to stack a full team with your clan with team swap, agreed.
I'm not bothered, my friend, I just commented and argued 🙂
What I'm getting at, gentlemen, is that the ideal is to have the maximum number of functions that we had in previous BF, and since each player chooses whether to use them or not, that will make the next BF glorious.
Hahahah whaaat you call me
Agree. I just think development of a really polished game would be easier if they only need to concentrate on one server tick rate. Instead of multiple.
I am already signed up on the ea Playtest page 😬
my problem is that I cant see the Battlefield Labs sign up on the es Playtest page
Just do it here and you’re good https://www.ea.com/en-gb/games/battlefield/battlefield-labs
@sly vineit was at the end of the survey i got the option to choose between the two so i chose BF lol
it was in small print
at the bottom
When I click on sign up i get redirected to the Playtest site and have to click on sign in then im logged into the EA Playtest site, but there’s nothing about Battlefiel
rip
Yeah that’s fine, there isn’t meant to be
If it directs you to the playtest site, that means you are signed up
Ohhh, so i did it alr 🙄
Thanks 😄
it could be worse. i just bough a SCUF ENVISION PRO from amazon and they sent me a broken used one that is quite literally dirty af 😭 they sending me a new one now
I have to check what this is
its smells like cigarettes LMFAO
160 is crazy
That would piss me of
i got it on sale there was a deal i payed 120
What yall think about Labs?
Yeah, the thing people saw on the playtest listing isn’t technically to do with the labs sign up process. You don’t manually opt in to the specific test, they let you know
honestly i was never a bf guy but this one looks pretty good cant like from what ive seen
hop it holds up 
I find it impossible to get excited for any new game nowadays
And can’t properly critique it from leaks alone either, I just want to get into it and really break it down to give solid feedback
Aiiiight
i always fine betas/alphas are better then the full release idk then the tweaks usualy break the fun parts about the game
for me anyway
Betas are fun but mostly cause everything is fresh
yeah thats true
100%
I would assume they’ll tell you where
Hello fellow Battlefield enjoyers, how are you doing today?

.
day
