#battlefield-labs-discussion
1 messages · Page 38 of 1
It just seems to me to be a desperate attempt at getting likes and upvotes, maybe build some hype.
Which doesn't appeal to me personally.
bro started placeholder texting 😭
Notice how they don't show desert gameplay lol, people would think Hourglass is this urban map similar to Shangai or something. https://youtu.be/WomAGoEh-Ss
Maybe part of why I don't mind the BF4 trailers for instance, is because when that released I was far less critical of games and their trailer practices, also haven't watched them since like 2015 ish.
Battlefield 4's trailer were MOSTLY gameplay, first and foremost
Like yeah, it was scripted, but still
What matters is that everyone will be on the hype train again when they release next 10 seconds gameplay of next BF 
Yeah, the only portions of Hourglass shown to be in the desert seem to be centered on the non-guaranteed sandstorm and tornado.
that's when you'll really see the hyper analysis from those youtubers
20 minute videos on 10s clips

8 minutes dedicated to stating the obvious, 2m for the sponsors and then 10m of slightly nuanced stuff
Tbf, Arc has a point in this regard, because I spent way too much of my time rewatching the 10 or so seconds we got from the BF Labs announcement, trying to identify the weapon system and equipment.
I.e. overanalyzing.
They are very careful to not show us anything which is kinda concerning
Everyone had an M4
Everyone wore the same camos
Yeah, I only noticed two different weapon in the trailer which was the pseudo-M4 and RPG-7
Which are about as common as table salt.
SkizzleAXE, oh my god
Can't stand that dude, clickbaits the shit out of his videos
Well, I guess also the M2HB and the Abrams main gun which I don't know the name of.
I'm not even sure if I can use swear words now tbh
Could it possibly be m1a1 hc?
Watched a Czech Youtuber that knows his stuff and that's what he labeled it
Although
I am unsure, I'm not that good with vehicles, but it could very well be the HC.
doesnt that guy just post political videos now
Can older Abrams versions be retrofitted with RCWS?
Now that I looked the HC up, it's open top
Open top, I mean the gunner seat
Well, yeah, but technically you can retrofit anything to have RCWS, so it's not a solid indicator for specific model.
Eh, they probably don't even know for sure what it is
Just label it Sep V3 and call it a day
Tbh I doubt DICE has a good enough gun nerd in their employment to be able to make these distinctions or for us to make conclusive deductions from it.
True, but as a qualified internet gun nerd, I like to engage in gunspotting just for the fun of it.
We used to have Alex 
alex who?
used to have
Indeed. Sad current state of affairs. :(
He was the weapon designer for DICE if memory serves me right
Or like weapons lead or what the exact title was, idk.
I'm unsure of his exact tenure duration but I know he was at DICE for at least Season 4 of 2042.
Idk, he might very well have been.
I just crossed paths with him by chance in this Discord when Season 4 had just dropped.
Perhaps DICE has hired new talent
Mayhaps
Kinda sucks because I remember sending some reference material to Alex just before he left.
I know nothing about him except he appearently added AC9 to game because Dread asked him to lol, which is actually pretty cool
Though tbf the Ak 5C was added after that, so who knows.
We got the deagle because of him
RM68 as well as far as I am aware. He really liked bullpup rifles if memory serves me well.
Yee
I still want T1 skins for portal guns 
Did you try?
T1 skins were pretty meh, so I don't care either way.
Also, are bullpups just guns that have magazine before the trigger?
I do, because they give me an incentive to grind them
As a general rule of thumb?
I have looked intensely at their careers page and found no hint of such a role :(
And yes. Bullpups are firearms that have the fire control group located in front of the magazine, in simple terms.
Are you a software engineer? Or something of those sorts?
I know you said you are
Something IT related
But those terms aren't as distinct for me as they are for you
P90 is also a bullpup despite not matching that criteria too tbh
I'm an educated network technician with zero work experience.
So I have started looking at studying further, currently debating going to game dev programming "school" with a company that's partnered with DICE. Also dabble in UE5 occasionally.
I have no idea, but I would imagine it's a senior position that's not exclusive.
they make gun go "boom" in game 
Well, obviously
I was just wondering if it's their job to program them too to some extent
I haven't a clue.
If i remember correctly Alex had his hands in all parts of what makes a gun a gun
in the game
if they're a weapons lead, that must mean they mostly stick with the managerial stuff/designing and then delegate to the relevant programmers/artists/mechanical people to make them a reality
Yeah, I'm guessing it's similar to project managerial role.
I wasn't too sure because roles do intertwine sometimes
I'd imagine Alex had a background as something else though, so he'd have some responsibility to help out as needed, as opposed to just telling other people what to do.
I don't mean this in a wrong way, but I'm not sure if you'd be qualified, as of right now, to be a weapon designer
Oh, absolutely not.
Goals must be set
Yeah, goals are in place, it's the path there that needs to be figured out.
I basically studied to become a network technician to get work experience and a fallback occupation, in (the very likely case) that my game dev dreams have to be cancelled.
Unfortunately the job market for network technicians in my current region is about as dry as sub-Saharan Africa. So needless to say, things are not working out great.
oh
Have you considered going abroad
Or just Finland, Norway?
Where the heck do you live where it's that bad
I have, but it's not a realistic opportunity because I have no guarantee of a job since I have literally no work experience and my "work experience" period during my studies was cancelled because there was no company that could take me on.
Northern Sweden.
That explains it
Yessir

Oh well, time will tell how this turns out :')
I would, but I sold all of mine.
Poor financial decision
Very.
lmao no, I may be stupid, but I am not that stupid.
You don't see the VISION...
I don't as much anymore, since I got medicated ;)
Wowzers
Some people take drugs to have a trip, I stop taking mine to have one.
Hell of a lot more financially viable.
Tbh, I could probably just get a job as a nightguard at a military museum and stop taking my medications and have the time of my fucking life.
Did anyone else get an confirmation email? I need to know
It's highly confidential, might get us arrested
As far as anyone is aware, there have only been emails confirming that you have applied, i.e. no admission emails yet.
I know that I’m just asking if anyone else got it
I can neither confirm nor deny that eventuality.
Oh I read it as "got in"
you had my hopes up there for a little bit
I won't get one anyways 
Reverse psychology
Shit well playtests are supposed to occurring shortly so 🤞
And we know how INTELLIGENT people are as not to leak anything, right?
should the next battlefield have
I will neither confirm nor deny that eventuality.
Is that even a question? 
People will start streaming it day -241 lol
Why would YOU confirm it...
Means you must know something
Or does it? 🤔
I'll lock you up in my basement if you don't spill the beans
Maybe find you a job there
Change of scenery could be nice.
Can't wait to receive an email on tuesday morning, just for it to be an advertisement for the newly opened kebab shop
Best of luck.
All I care about if the game is actually good
Probably won't be in Pre-Alpha
It will indicate the direction
Of Battlefield
Gameplays wise, obviously not good in that state
i hope they do
Shut up, fishy-boi.
You could say ''playtime's over when Nicki drops in'' 
👴
That was weeeeird
Good day Everyone, so, we continue falling into madness yeah?
Yeah 🤣🤣 We all wanna play a new battlefield 🥺🥺
I played BFV this morning, I was on Merkur and nobody moved an inch... It was sniper fest and AA-tank Galore.
It was miserable
Thankfully, the game after that on Al Marj was great
I was just playing underground 24/7 while I used to play BFV lol 

Appearently the reason why 2042 didn't looked as good as BF1 or V is because they didn't use photogrammetry
Most likely due to time constraints
Hopefully next game fixes that







Well well well, look Who it is
BATTLEFIELD

TLEFIELDBAT
Time constraints and covid meant they couldn't use their photogrammetry studio as much as they'd like. It required them to use a lot of older assets that lacked consist art style or visual intent
2042s assets and the engine it used look better than BFV IMO. The maps and decoration was/is just bad/bland or missing.
bf1 had really good artstyle but bf2042 is superior in terms of real polygons etc im sure
yeah 2042 just fumbled the tone and atmosphere completely
but in terms of actual graphics it's better
The foliage systems in the newer engine are so much better than BFV. It has insane amounts of grass pop in even at max settings.
At least visibility isn't as shite as bfv
and was rushed
Yeah, all of the above are a symptom of it being rushed.
Well I’m glad they’re going back to smaller dense maps for the next game
I'm very torn on the matter of what type of maps would be desirable in the next game. I don't settle for just saying "I want good maps", as that contributes so little to the discussion, and is quite an obvious statement.
On the one hand, there's plenty of urban style maps I would like to see, centered around for example a mall or large warehouse. On the other hand, I also would like to see more rural maps; trenchlines in forests, dense rainforests, etc.
It's difficult to "construct" a mental image of maps I would like to see, but stuff like suburban areas are exceptionally interesting to me.
GTA V Enhanced preload on steam now!
Hear me our. A map only made out of red containers.
good lord theyre selling another version of gta5?
Its free
Free upodate. Raytracing.
oh good
I also wouldn't mind seeing a game mode that progresses over several maps, similar to grand operations from BFV.
Well apparently there’s apparently gonna be maps set in New York, Downtown LA, I also found coordinates on the BF labs page that’s leads to China.
Oh what I would do for a online multiplayer campaign mode similar to Red Orchestra 2/Rising Storm (2).
Nice, hopefully we don't have exclusively skyscrapers though.
Is it apparent?
Leaks and rumors
Of NY and LA yes but China I found on my own
Well the studio trailer shows a glimpse of a map with a modern cars, a partially destroyed highway and overpass, with USA road signs. 53 seconds in this video (Which not many have watched)
Four studios across the globe. One brand-new visionary team: Battlefield Studios. This global united front combining 20+ years of Battlefield experience with the best emerging talent in our industry is hard at work to shape the future of our franchise. Our ambitions are big, so we’re going bigger to deliver the best experience for our players.
...
Very nice.
Looks like the Egypt map to me
I think that’s one is called Eastwood if I’m not mistaken
I found the NY one here https://www.reddit.com/r/Battlefield/s/DQlo0loZ1s
I think maps the size of BFVs Rotterdam are a perfect size. Bring back multi-level elevation based maps, not just large maps.
Launch with 10 Panzerstorms and we re golden
Is that the one with the church in the middle?
Sort of semi-destroyed town.
Pearl Market from BF4, but a bit larger and not so cramped would also be nice. I really like maps like Siege of Shanghai also. Lots of elevation, car garages, underpasses to fight through.
Siege of Shanghai is arguably the worst map in bf history, idc what you guys say
january 23rd?
ok.
Na, your opinion is wrong. Siege is a series fan favorite
This is Rotterdam, you are thinking of Devastation
Battlefield V 4K Rotterdam Gameplay max settings | Battlefield 5 Open Beta (BF5) |
Battlefield 5 Gameplay on Rotterdam BETA. New guns, features, building bridges, gun customisation and much more. Is it any good though? Let's take a look! Leave a LIKE and a comment, thanks for watching.
-~--~-~~-~-
Please watch: "[4K] This Unreal Engine 5 Su...
Siege was garbage
Ohh, that one. Yeah, that one is pretty good size wise but a touch too built up for my liking.
you probably like rogue transmission
There's lots of verticality on it, which is nice, but just doesn't scratch my itch.
Repeating the same bad opinion wont make it true. Youre entitled to yours, but im entitled to call it wrong
Man, I would kill for a Grand Operation progressing deeper into a city each day.
Rural, suburbs, urban.
Shanghai’s leveloution event was peak tho even i have to agree with that
It was trash, and makes the map worse.
The duality of man.
Bro is wrong on so many levels
*metro

If something looks cool, but makes gameplay after it bad, said thing is bad.
What map in your opinion had the best leveloution event besides Shanghai?
The tower falling down does hinder gameplay enjoyment imo.
it hinders gameplay for almost everyone
nobody likes C after the building comes down
Most of the levelution events were cool looking, but bad for the levels.
yet people glaze it like there's no tomorrow because it looks cool for 10 seconds
hope they don't take much inspiration from that and BC2's level everything to the ground
Paracel storms is OK, cos it looks great, and also adds something to the flag it affects (An extramounted turet on the crashed ship)
paracel storm is prob one of my favorites
It’s need to be like bf3 destruction mix it in with a little of BC2 destruction
-# (I never played BF4 so I'm taking my opinion on that from gameplay videos
)
Huh, that's actually rather surprising.
Well BF4 did come out 12 years ago
I had a 360 at the time
No it didn't.
Lots of people here were probably 4-8 years old when it arrived
don't remind me
That statement makes me feel old, therefore I reject it as false. /s
it's so wild hearing people say they haven't played very popular and well known titles
I would like real time dynamic destruction for the next bf game
In the words of Adam Savage; I reject your reality and substitute my own.
it was borderline unplayable on the 360
what do you mean by this
It’s not scripted
Maybe in 50 years
the only reason the finals can do destruction like that is because their maps are like 1% of a battlefield map
So I returned and stuck with BO2 and swapped ghosts with a friend with a different game I had I don't remember
And its like 6 player max.
Idk cause the gameplay teaser looked like it had dynamic destruction
we had bad company 2 tho with cardboard box houses who could be flattened
and even then it struggled a lot with performance at times, i can't imagine trying to do that sort of stuff in battlefield
but I was sort of feeling burnt out on the modern setting at the time anyways
unfortunately we can confirm right now it doesn't
Peopel dont even know what they are asking for when they say they want dynamic destruction.
if the franchise still exists in a few decades maybe it'll happen
People ask for a lot of stuff they don't know what actually is.
Not very dynamic, but again it's 'in-dev footage' so I won't make a final judgement over it
Shoot rocket at building > part of building you shot explodes and a piece is destroyed, falling away.
This is what 99% of people would call dynamic destruction
It can if they go down the Fortnite route
As in, massively push UGC
BF Forge basically I'm meaning
Reminded me of a battlefield 1 version , but with a modern look to it
Fortnites money isnt made with UGC tho
Destruction wise
M-map editor, please
They bring in alot of players though, players stay and interact with 'experiences' and feel further pushed to invest more in the game
Just look at all the celebrity collabs they did, those had their own cosmetics
This is what I hope the supposed 'Portal 2.0' has at the least
ea's ceo has been repeatedly alluding to that in calls too
Do they tho? My mates play random user made content maybe once a month, 99% of their time spent is in the main mode
well that's anecdotal, my friends spend alot of time on the UGC stuff to the point where I have to beg them to play a few rounds of the normal BR
That would be extremely pleasant, and probably extend the game's lifetime quite extensively.
What UGC stuff specifically?
there is very little high quality UGC content, thats not skinned branded crap
I'm guessing UGC is User Generated Content, aka mods?
EA did put a job list early last year for an VFX director and it mentioned “Most Realistic Destruction Effects” and I’m pretty sure it’s for the next bf
Those arena experiences or 'this gun only' kind of modes
yeah
https://www.reddit.com/r/GamingLeaksAndRumours/s/g55SkD2Vzg here’s the link
doesn't really mean anything, that's like the most vague generic job description you could pick
I mean job vacancy descriptions are always kind of like that
what's a fact is that the finals-like destruction will not happen in battlefield at any point in the next like 20 years
the finals struggles enough as is and the maps are tiny with 9 players
Ah, very neato. Yeah, as a sort-of semi-half maybe-sometimes modder for Arma, I know UGC can make a big difference in how long a game can maintain appeal. Admittedly Arma 3 mod tools are like actively trying to prevent you from using them to their full extent, but Reforger has a lot going for it.
I've been trying to get a new part-time and so many companies glaze their cashier or restocker position like you must have alot of experience with it and you're doing something that's very impactful

The finals level of destruction is not suitable for a BF game tbh
It could happen tho
it can't
Sounds like a cool future
Extreme performance machines are extremely affordable for the masses
Finals destruction for the next bf game sounds crazy and there chalking old gen consoles for the next game
But finals level destruction would be awful 
I looked at The Finals very superficially but the one thing I took away from that glance was that everything was destructible. That does not make for an enjoyable experience in a game with very heavy vehicles with depleted uranium projectors and explosive devices.
Maybe it's just me, but I would rather there be some structural integrity in games.
Its literally not technically possible to do destruction like that on bigger maps, and with more than 10 players ATM
wake me up when finals has a tdm mode with shorter ttk
I'll wake you up in a few millenia.

yep, destruction in the finals is very limited, only a few gadgets can cause significant destruction and they're class restricted
in battlefield the whole map would be levelled and map design becomes irrelevant
Exactly. You need to have some permanent pieces of cover.
The type of destruction BF already is capable of is more than fine
seriously, we don't need super realistic accurate procedural whatever the fuck
battlefield can fake it well enough
dw it's not possible
but rest assured they'll find other ways to make performance horrible
If they do the finals like destruction then I would be happy, I’m not saying for other people tho
Oh, my predictions were incorrect.
You might be happy, but let me tell ya, your PC would not be.
Destruction wise, the only real difference in the type of destruction that can be done in finals, that isnt done in BF is destroying roofs and floors. And they deliberately dont allow that in BF for design and balance.
Has anyone here played Arma Reforger's Avdiivka map (a community made map)?
unfortunately not but the game is on my wishlist
If I am thinking of the right map, it's a really good town map with outlying points of interest.
I realize I am likely to get a lot of people snarling at me, but I do sort of hope for something along those lines in the next BF game. Maybe slightly smaller, but same format.
Well hopefully the game Ripple Effect are working on can use large POI based maps
Yours truly is going to sleep.
Enjoy your evenings, mornings, afternoons, nights, 1920's, halloweens, new years, christmas, midsummer, etc
It’s gonna be an F2P BR
Have a good Sleep! 🙂
you might as well have heard this in a dream
It’s obvious
it really isn't
EA wants that 🤑
Very likely to be
Read what bsod said again
Why else would you hire the original director of Warzone
you never played bad company 2 then
nope, but being able to fully level buildings is excessive and ruins map flow 
BC2 was notorious for having maps break because of destruction eliminating opportunities to defend caps lol
well it worked for bad company 2 becaus the finals was devs from bc2 and idsay it ws one of the best battlefields
Any MCOM in a building was a guaranteed cap
yea but add he bfv build mode with the bc2 destruction and you got somthign there
No, because destruction is far easier to do than fortify.
I don't remember it working well on some BC2 maps ngl, some eventually just became flat and there wasnt anything left
jsut means ya gotta take that sniper else where
Yeah you either just got levelled at a distance and you could no longer disarm MCOMs because you had no cover, or the MCOM would be destroyed when the building collapsed
it was not flat you could hide inside the broken building and use the remains as cover
dropping a building still compkeates your objective
ouch my spelling
When everything can be destroyed to rubble with not a lot of cover left, that is not a good thing. You have to factor in everything from gadgets, vehicles, height of terrain around etc. There is so much to it.
There be should be buildings & such that have an inner-structures that can't be completely blown up.
Yeah that's my point, you can't defend a point that was inside a multi level building because you could just shoot the building to destroy the point. That just meant a tank or heli could sit near uncap and shoot into the obj for a free cap.
It ruined maps having no solid structures.
Hell I remember that map you could even knife one of the structure support pillars and it'd instagib the building for an instant cap.
im trying to figure where the usa road signs are
And a return of fortifications
You'd need fortifications to be Fortnite tier of speed in order to make it effective, which would defeat the point of the game.
Much easier to just have a good level of destruction but keep good map design by retaining certain structures as not fully destructible.
So shipment from CoD?
People just want to turn map into a flat minecraft template, gameplay? Who cares. Destruction? Everything they see should be destructible.
BFV didn't had BC2 tier destruction, although it was more advanced than BF1 or 2042 or 4
Bf5 maps could be rendered bare but fortifications would literally allow for the reconstruction of what's needed.
It made the maps feel more alive.
ofc they're asking for what THE FINALS has 
any news about the testing? did anyone ever got anything? what's going on? lol
nope
Even if they did, can't tell ya. Under NDA.
Be patient lol
but i dont like hospitals :(

i can't lol


thats why they put some they could not fully destroy
I really, really hope suppressors are given an overhaul in the next game to actually make them worthwhile, especially when compared to 2042.
The reduced muzzle velocity, from what I gather, is something that keeps people from actually using them.
Not to mention the 2042 distinction between "light" and "heavy" suppressors basically annihilating their viability at every imaginable range. Imo they should differ only in visual appearance.
I think a decent compromise would be having suppressors increase recoil/decrease controllability, remove the tracer component from fired bullets, and give complete minimap stealth when firing, regardless of range.
Integrally suppressed weapons though should have a reduced muzzle velocity since subsonic muzzle velocities are pretty much always guaranteed for integrally suppressed weapons. Maybe give them a larger "uncertainty" angle in the victim damage indicator.
holy crap those suppressors are really living rent free in your head huh
Yessir.
I love suppressors, as my display name might hint at.
Increase recoil, just like real life right? 
Increase recoil to "emulate" overgassing. Since we unfortunately can't blow gas in the player's face, I settled for that as a substitute.
How would you like to see it done?
1:1 cod style where every gun is overgassed apparently
I'm not familiar with how COD does, well, anything, so.
Every weapon class in 2042 already has a good suppressed weapon already
MP9 for SMGs
DFR for LMGs
AK5C for ARs
BSVM for DMRs
Well... Yeah, but my point still stands. The decreased muzzle velocity and reduced damage output make the heavy suppressors such an unattractive option to the extent no one uses them that much.
Weapons I listed has same TTK with big supps as they have with other muzzle options
They exist, but they're not exactly a worthwhile option.
Are we taking into consideration using subsonic rounds?
Yep
MP9 has 289ms TTK with subsonic, also has 289ms TTK with subsonic and type 4
PB is useless but Type 4 is very useful
Maybe it has changed from when I last tried it, but in my experience the heavy suppressors made the weapons useless since they reduced the range of the weapons to a range where the suppressors no longer gave minimap stealth.
Even if the TTK is the same though, the decreased muzzle velocity and subsequently increased bullet drop make their choice questionable.
Weapons I listed still has same TTK/BTK with big supps
Bullet drop doesn't matter unless you are using snipers
Muzzle velocity matters though
Bullet drop does matter, especially if you're using DMRs though I will admit with ARs or SMGs it's a negligible factor.
However, since I mostly use DMRs, that's where most of my experience is.
Well yeah they matter in DMRs
Honestly I bet next game will have so much 💩ty ways to spot players ranging from 3D spotting to TUGS to pokeballs to drones anyways so not like suppressors will matter lol
Supps only mattered in BFV
Speaking of T-UGS; I would prefer they had a maximum tracked targets limit.
Like closest 4 people are the only ones to be tracked.
Pokeballs, I use extensively, but I admit that those are way too powerful (at least in BF4).
I prefer tugs because pokeballs can expire
Maybe it's because I play recce class very aggressively, but I find the motion sensor balls to be more useful.
Suppressors definitely should exist.
The amount of fun I have with them, is beyond the comprehension of mere mortals.
another reason for them not to exist
Not really. Suppressors have several use cases.
Yap it out
I was hoping you'd know I was just trying to annoy you
Fission Mailed.
nuclear fission?
Sure.
hey
whatareyoudoing
nothing
I was making a reference to DCS: World.
But nice, none the less, have you considered doing something?
no
Alrighty-tighty.
Just waiting to mark down March 4th on my calendar as the day of disappointment
Make sure to keep your permanent marker close
hobbyist
gibson
hobbyist
gibson
bro
sis
hobbyist
gibson
i forgot
Good.
Anyways.
I do hope the next game does not have machine pistols universally available.
hobbyist
gooberson
Alright, I can give you a recipe for cyanide if you'd like.
delete, mods ban ban
no
Machine pistol sidearms, big no-no in my book.
They just become the universal go-to for everyone.
Or at least limit them to a specific class with a limited ammunition capacity.
Sort of like Hardline did it with limiting fully automatic pistols to professional class.
The amount of people who run G18 in BF4 is actually criminal.
Dunno I barely used it
how about no. Just get good. If you are complaining about a side arm then there is a personal problem in a battlefield game for you.
Any eta for live playtest?
start in 5 minutes
You must've misunderstood me. I do not mean to say that I have an issue with the weapon itself, I have an issue with it being practically the only sidearm that people use. I'd rather not have to deal with the same sidearm every single time.
Maybe I am the exception rather than the rule, but I prefer some variety in weapons, including sidearms.
I'm just not crazy about the idea of having a pocket SMG as a sidearm.
I’d say it’s fair enough to not want them
But, realizing that some people are reliant on having fully automatic sidearms to get them out of a tight spot, I find it more worthwhile to suggest them be limited to a specific class instead.
I honestly can't remember them doing much balancing of the sidearms in 2042.
I think they "nerfed" the G57 at some point. Don't quote me on that though as I have no immediately available proof of that.
Then I seem to recall correctly — hooray.
You could still balance the sidearms more by making some/most fo the others better. More damage, ETC
I feel like a good way to balance sidearms would also be faster and lower ADS speeds, then limiting the available attachments/upgradeability of semi-autos
G57 was pushed to real stupid levels by giving it a drum mag and 35+1 rounds.
Ease of use is good but that just pushed it to unhealthy levels of ease.
Example using 2042...make the semi auto Glock only have an 11 round mag, with 19 per bullet damage, while making something like the M1911 have a max mag size of 14, with per bullet damage of 24
I don't mind the concept of the drum as long as there's some sort of balance. For the scar its literally equivalent to a standard extended mag (and works within the context of the weapon)
G57 doesn't even have the best TTK
Deagle has
2 shot kill in 20 meters
One taps to the head too
It's way easier for the average player to use tho.
I use G57 though because it's fun, especially if I'm playing as a sniper
I'm not talking about ttk it's just super mega easy to use.
Outside of point blank nope nope nope
G57 is useless at range too
M44 is a pocket sniper
It's not a bad weapon but quite simply you'll be out aimed by ranged weapons.
One taps to the head up to 100 meters
M44 has the drawback of having slower firerate, though
Yeah
Rex is as good as both deagle and M44 though
One taps to the head up to 50 meters with similar TTK to Deagle
Only issue is lack of sight options
True, but still
I would've used Rex if it had a red dot
Pocket sniper and a deagle at the same package
Monkey mashing the desert Eagle or any side arm asides from the high rpm side arms won't get you far.
I've made that horrible mistake when drunk many times.
Just aim slightly lower parts of their chest
I main the p125 and the laugo alien and primarily use them for hipfire.
Monkey mashing beyond point blank reasonably just hasn't worked in my favour.
These are the first 2 times I've heard that phrase 😅
People who complain about G57 obviously haven't played 2142 btw 
In 2142 support had an OP SMG secondary that was better than assault rifles
People were using support to play with SMG
People dont complain about it. I dont also, but I do wish it didnt make other options irrelevant
eww skate, give me battlefield
gn
Would rather be playing battlefield labs than watching the Oscar’s 
I heard that March 4th we’re getting something from bf labs
Maybe an invitation
We’ll see
March 4th is just an upload for bf labs to EA app/origin/website
It doesn't mean anything atm
We don’t know that for sure tho
We’ll see what happens
Well anyway, Marche 3rd will Mark 1 month exactly since the registrations opened
And then another month of waiting will await us 
They Said Weeks, Let's hope it's not another month 😭

We'll be waiting until


117 years should be fine for a perfect launch right? 
How much memory space do you think the new GTA will need?
350 gbs
Hello guys. I'm new here. Any news about the playtest. Stupid EA said in few weeks.
Well, just wait a few more weeks
this is still under a few weeks relative to their development cycle
also who knows, maybe they've already started 🤷 we wouldnt know unless theres some transparency from ea's side on this
They have not. My guess is that invites will be send this week but who knows
4th march 
Well that's the build release date
They could start testing tomorrow with invites sent today
Or release a build tomorrow and test it for a week more
1 day to inform people sounds like something they wouldn't do
They have also been very calm since I dropped that reddit post 😦
Why not? You have been invited come and play
which post
Playtests last for weeks
The 4th march post
ah then its fair, i dont know cuz ive never playtested ea games b4
are you the api man
Yes
oh 😂
Yeah well

2 more weeks
How so?
It's a meme
Also keep in mind that I have not seen console builds. Based on skate playtests I saw, they should be published as well
Ah
Huh, how do you know? Did they say anywhere?
*a release builds date.
Yeah something like that....
btw they have for some reason moved build date to 14 utc today
So good chance that on march 4th we get something?
No one knows.
No one knows.
What the fuck
HAHA
I fucking blinked man
I would say chances are high we will get something this week
They have prepared everything they could now, and now the build, so there will be nothing stopping for starting the tests
praying i get an invite
well one things for sure - we will know when they start because people online can't keep their traps shut
details will leak regardless of how tight knit they want to keep it
Facts
They know this too
Im thinking that if you got an confirmation email then you’re good to go
Cause I did
Did not everyone get one of those?
Not everyone
Huh weird
we don't know because some were delayed
and because that email is completely under nda, so many people aren't going around saying that they got it
I'm sure you all have received an invitation anyway and are pretending you don't know 
I will neither confirm or deny that possibility.
If anybody is interested in random non needed info, new bf labs build size is 42.52Gb.
This is exactly the kind of useless information that I live for. Thank you, Armour Piercing Incendiary Man.
lol!
Not me, I'm not in
So that means yes, got it
Thanks for the info!
Not that I would be chosen anyway, I'm never lucky
Well it says “Dont talk about it” But i didnt sign anything so i dont think that equates to an actual NDA right?
you signed a lot of things when you created a playtesting account
Oh ive had the playtesting account for years so didnt think of that yeah
all playtesting communications can't be shared as per the tos
yeah a lot of people overlook that
But is that not what happened with 2042 before release when gameplay leaked? playtests that were sort of under NDA
Yes and they were Taken down
yeah ofc people will leak it regardless, but the idea is that they don't
And their EA playtesting account terminated
You did sign when applying for playtest
Technically, EA could take legal actions against those leaking
Also for wondering: I'm 90% sure invites could only start since this build is now released

Technically yes, but everything I leak is open lol
You can find this if you try
API the goat
And EA has ability to close this data but they didn't
yeah they reserve the right to pound you entirely with legal action but normally it's not that deep
I meant leaking footage and studf
Nothing against you API man 🙂
But it will most likely result in playtesting permaban
Yep
Is playtest build gonna be on EA app or steam as well?
More than likely EA app, I doubt they would release a test build to Steam.
Yeah it is EA App only. Didn't find any mentions of Steam
Unlike Skate playtest btw
Too bad dont like it very much
People will start streaming as soon as playtests begins lol 
they'll probably have people on watch 24/7 to take down streams and videos
Jesper, I have a quick question for you.
that's what another game i was playtesting did
Är herrn medborgare i Svea Rike?
Facts
That would be the best thing to do tbh
Huh, interesting.
With thousands of playtesters
neuken in de koiken.
exactly neuken in de keuken
👍
ja
You think? with thousands of playtesters so much videos are gonna come out i think its very unrealistic that theyll be able to control it very well
i don't think they'll just let it happen
They may not smite the offenders immediately, but I am virtually certain that they will be smitten.
but at the same time, i think they've accepted that footage will undoubtedly be leaked no matter what they do
no way around it with so many playtesters
especially considering how many of them can't even read an email in its entirety
Just hope its gonna be good
Agreed, my swamp-german friend.
2042 seemed so good before release and then it was kinda bad
well
It probably won't be that good though, at least not during the playtesting, since it's still pre-alpha.
even in 2042 there were lots of hints
looking back we could already see the game would have some form of specialists, very open maps, etc
Well those who leaked it on Reddit are probably already crossed from the list
Was there? i remember that the hype for 2042 was like a lot
That was the point yes
yeah lmao "hey guys did anyone else get this email?"
DO NOT SHARE in bright red
yep, people mostly just didn't notice it or ignored it because dice was appealing to the nostalgia very hard
I remember when the alpha happened, I wasn't impressed but still gave benefit of the doubt for the beta, played the beta and was kind of disappointed
Remember chaps, Glomar Response is the only response.
Exactly 😂😂
GLOMAR
Yessir.

I just hope theyll have fixed the feeling of like aiming that they messed up in 2042
felt like just a little off or something
like delayed
People: checking website for invite
Skate playtest: 
and inconsistent
yeah 2042 has had input problems since launch
I swear, I'm playing BFV and MWIII a lot these days and whenever I hop on BF2042, it feels so clunky and sluggish, it's like I never played an FPS before
Pretty much lol
such a downgrade from bfv
really sad, i was sure the game would at least FEEL good, because surely they already learned how to get it right in bfv
Wonder if theyll get it out next year
probably depends a lot on gta 6 and whether that comes out this year
for sure
repeating myself a lot now, but i have a feeling they're gonna wait for gta to have a release date and then do the opposite of that
we saw that ubisoft had no issue delaying ac shadows to avoid the clutter of releases
I don't quite understand the hype around GTA 6... Like, yeah, GTA 6 is probably gonna be a decent game, but people act like it's the second coming of Christ or something.
gta 5 was huge, so it's only natural
It probably will be compared to the standard of games we have now
and rockstar impressed people a lot with rdr2, so hype only went up from there
if it isnt gonna be like amazing and revolutionary its not gonna be good enough for rockstar
the pitiful state of gta5 online is one of the bigger reasons why gta6 is anticipated. the second being newgen software
itll likely be miles better than 5. plus R* has seemingly been making car models very akin to IRL counterparts, so there's that
Basically, everytime a GTA is released, it revolutionates the industry, pushes devs to new stuff, Rockstar sets standards
What standard did GTA5 set
aside from being able to milk it for years
and that having giga trash servers is okay
and cheating? who cares
set the standard for how much bs players are willing to take from a studio
i just hope the story is good and doesn't get abandoned
It’s not milking if it’s working. Hard to knock a company for keeping a single game relevant for over 13 years. It’s dam impressive actually. Right call of duty?
it's definitely milking
My sole hope for GTA 6 is a lunatic character to surpass Trevor.
you can call it whatever you want, it works for them, if it wasn't they would not be dropping so much content over the course of time
milking it? probably. Efective? for sure, they are seeing a shit ton of money
well duh
Yo I got an skate available playtest too I was so mad 😂
And you can expect the same thing with GTA 6 as there are rumors that it will be their last one or at least for a loooong time
it being effective is the reason we have had only 2 games in 12 years
you really think that GTA 5 was innefective?
why bother doing anything else when players are perfectly content buying shark cars from a 2013 game
idk where you think i said that
Bro rockstar made a quarter of billion dollars with gta 5
Rockstar will probably cover the cost of the game solely in preorders lol
definitely
they could shit the bed and people would still pre order like there's limited stock
Does that mean that I’m not getting an invite still?
Sure if you try
@rapid fox Hey, any news from API man ? 👀
Scroll up a bit. They've supposedly changed to build date to be in 38 minutes.
Rather than tomorrow, that is
They have actually changed it again after that so now I know build size
And it's out yeah
Ah neat.
42.52Gb
is there any truth in the comments of playtesting for BF starting tomorrow?
Issue is that GTA6 online won't be as good as GTA5 online, at least not during the launch, GTA5 online has so much content they can't implement right away
or those who claim that there is something to wait for tomorrow?
Sweet
read that post again and report back
ohh nice, but is still set for tomorrow or did they changed the date ?
Date was changed to today
? fill me in, I only heard from 3rds, what post do you mean?
...what do you even mean
okay, maybe so they are able to try the build to see if it's all good or maybe i'm just hard on copium 😂
there was only 1 reddit post about the 4th of march. which was changed to today. and that was gamebuild upload date. not playtesting
oh
got it
I never got to the post itself, I heard from others, so obviously I did not get the full pic
@steel torrent
Nope, that is playtesting build size
My post said that new build comes out on 4th march and that's it
It doesn't mean anything but one thing: they have technical possibility to send invites now
you saying the build is coming out today was a prank?
Sorry are you reading correctly?
you sent a message earlier today saying utc 14.00?
or they set that time today for tomorrow?
did i misunderstand?
My previous post claimed it was March 4. Today, they have decided to publish it today and move time to 14, and then to 12 utc
I don't know reasons for that obv
Since 14 makes no sense I could guess that it was a timezone typo
Because it was changed really fast
Confusion, wooooo
well, guess itll be a long week ahead of us if they're planning something for this weekend
The fact is that build has been published 😄
That's all you need to know basically
Yep.
if i get into the playtest, i hereby promise that i will ||keep all the footage to myself until the NDA expires||
Good, as you should
I assume they'll let people download the build for some days and then the servers will open
Btw no preload is expected
Not sure about servers
Playtests will be running for a few weeks (2 min)
What good is this type of info? It's all guessing and speculation. Creating false expectations for dates and times.
In my opinion it is better than full lack of information
For example it could also give some hope because you know that invites have not been sent yet
Disagree. Since you first said the 4th, now moved to 14th through API snooping, and will probably move again. It's creating a false sense of legitimate info gain.
Literally none of this is helping anyone. Just creating some false sense of importance on the info, that likely means nothing to people here.
we come here to literally discuss anything new if it pops up. hard disagree
anything else is just a cope and a silly way to pass the time
Yeah, about labs itself. Not info gained from snooping their backend apis
insert "y'all got anymore of that information" gif
I have known it's bf labs since september but never leaked it because it would be meaningless. Here I shared because it gives something
Good for you I guess.
For some people it is useless and they prefer to wait, I'm not that kind of guy and I clearly see there are others
I don't see why this info belongs here tho
Just too small for reddit, plus I love to discuss that
gamers when the game discussion channel is used for discussing the game
at least his info is a little reliable, unlike the other guy that's saying a bunch of leaks are confirmed features
I sure hope something indeed happens this week so it would actually mean something for expectations
info on playtesting builds and possible timeframes for testing of BF labs doesnt belong in the labs channel? yeah, its speculation. at the very least it confirms things are moving along
no, we shall wait another month before invites are sent 
It confirms next to nothing. All it's giving is cope for when actual news might arrive.
I also speculate on trand. EA was super silent in API for weeks and last week they suddenly became very active plus a new build
Dunno I just love to talk about that
Info that can't even be shared due to NDA.
i'm just messing with you 😭
we all hope they do something soon, but all we can do is wait 
And we will still see twitch stream day one
With ban following 15 minutes after it starts
But tbh I won't do that myself
API leaks one thing...
thats funny, thinking any news about playtests would be posted at all
For about 30 seconds just now, I was deeply concerned
There is currently air raid sirens blaring outside
Then it struck me, today is the first monday in March, the day that the air raid sirens are tested in Sweden
is it just a beginning of the month test 
It's like every 3 or 4 months
we get tornado siren tests every first tuesday of the month
one time it happened when it was foggy as hell and i was like, "Silent Hill"?
Neat, do they announce in the siren that it's a test?
I swear they say "This is a test, this is only a test" in the US sirens
nah, not for tornado sirens
you would know if it's a real actual siren because the sky would be that weird green color and really bad winds and storms 
Fair point
Brodie he said the date was changed to today so invites might be coming out soon learn to read for once
👆 👆 👆 👆
Precisely why this date and build info sharing is stupid.
RIP Dale
you know that message means i read the said message correctly, right? the misunderstanding happened later
Discussing anything in here might just be stupid
They won't take what we say here into consideration so why not just let API Eren man say what he knows
Ha, the big funni

This debate reminds me of the debate surronding Temporyal during BFV lifecycle
Some people praised him for sharing stuff, while others hated him for creating false expectations
In the end, none of this would be an issue in the first place if there would be "COMMUNICATION"
That's why I like followings devlogs for various game's mods, they actually do weekly logs where they share what they've been Working on.
Keeps the hype up
Leaks would not be needed if we had proper dates communication :p
To be fair on tempos end he shared stuff he found cool but it did fuck up parts of the community.
My favourite part was when he was showing how the m1919 was constructed throughout season 4 and made into a ready state for season 5.
They arent needed regardless.
Leaks aren't needed, agreed, but they can be nice to have, but it needs to be understood by the people taking in that information that it is not final or definitive.
Which, given we inhabit the digital internet realm, where the average IQ is probably double-digit, isn't always a given that they do.
New build March 4 with no guaranties? That means like they will start playing at that date hype 💯 💯 💯
Most people seeing dates here, or on reddit will take it as gospel, and thus youll have people expecting news, when we already have all the news we need.
"Wait to be selected, keep an eye on your emails for playtest news"
But timmy reddit post wants to keep us updated, So I guess GG
Yep, a lot of people take things on the internet for gospel.
Case in point, I wrote a fake military manual excerpt and a lot of people believed it to be official.
If I get in I will leak everything I have to my friend who can leak it 
I agree, and again that's the first fault of EA/DICE to reveal BFLABS too early just to please the investors

Go away >:(

you guys really are impatient kids pff LETS TALK ABOUT WHAT WE WANT IN THE NEXT BATTLEFIELD JUST LIKE WE DID IN THE PAST 12 MONTHS
Why
Is jok.
I would, but I am not a fan of repeating myself.
Unless the topic comes up naturally, that is.
being old must be boring
It is exceptionally boring.
Not looking forward to becoming older.
Eh, There is enough of "Should the next Battlefield have ..." Post on the subreddit currently
thats what im talking about
since people dont want to talk about leaks and things like that
lets talk about the same things over and over again
yaaay
so we agree it has to be a mix of BF3, BF4, with the grittiness of BF1 and graphics of BF5 or beyond, right?
absolutely
and have the movement of BFv or bf4 airstrafing with a slide 
With the of BF
"with the of BF"?
Like I said, if we got the feature from Battlefield that’d be so cool
if we gonna get tanks is gonna be so dope
Sliding tanks
Imagine dragons
BF Fantastic Warfare Confirmed
@rapid fox we want more dates
with your mom


Today. 5PM.
we die from no news
It’s actually 3:11pm
more
tell her to bring lingerie
been wearing the special ocassion red thong since they announced labs. PLEASE SHARE NEWS! it starting to itch...
Inferior timezone
Oof, got stricken down.
first you have to tell us what you want in the next battlefield tho
Prox chat
guns
5 guns but with bf1’s ‘attachment’ system
Honestly I do quite like bf1’s approach
the devs already took note, too late
I never tried it, but I would imagine it makes sense for a WW1 game, not so much for a modern era shooter where weapons are more or less just glorified picatinny adapters with the coincidental abiliy to propel small metal objects.
They launched 2042 with 20 weapons 😂
far too many
Well in 2042 or bf4 I always just go for the jack of all trades build, but even more ‘all’ in 2042 cause of attachment swapping. In bf1 the specialised builds actually feel like they each have set use cases and are interesting to use
should have been one weapon and a fully fledged gunsmith with a zillion weapon part combos

I don't blame you, a lot of people likely do that, but I prefer more flexibility personally, at least in a modern era shooter. In a World War 1 game, I would probably have also gone for the system BF1 used.
I do despise the plus system from 2042 with a passion and hope that never returns since it removed practically all importance of kit preparation.
@rapid fox please don’t give us false hope because honestly we all got excited for the last 2 battlefields and looked how those turned out
Don't pay attention to leaks that gives you false hope then 🤷
If you get any new information just let it out
Most leaks are fabricated marketing anyways
Exactly that’s why I’m not getting excited
I’ve been on the same boat for 7 years
your boat hasnt been spotted yet, thats why life isnt exciting
if it were you'd at least be getting shot at
I love not being excited for any new AAA launches
Leaves more room to engage with smaller indie project :>
Although stalker 2 is still good, enjoying that. Just really want the next bf to reignite that spark
Would of you thought 11 years ago that indie projects would have better life and quality games than most AAA studios?
Indie games 11 years ago were bangers too
Yep but if someone would’ve told me I would laugh
Tbh, they should have made the Labs announcement a bit further in Development. They should have made the first External Playtest Waves for only EA Playtesting Members that already were part of the Program and not try to enlist so many people that dont even know they already signed a NDA
I totally agree
Can we expect any news today?
No
I get why people say this. They want the playtests to start and start ASAP. But everything with this stuff is a process. They want to get as many players signed up as possible, then get the right people invited into playtests.
How can you be sure that you get the right people (Location/region wise) if you dont first have an extensive sign up and vetting period?
Peoples lack of patience on this front frustrates me, because everyone complains about rushed, unpolished games...but at the same time wants them to rush out play-testing systems? What happpened to letting them cook?
I want an unplayable buggy mess, bugs are Battlefield's soul 😛
Bring back long neck
100 percent agree with this. Things that are good take time
For the beta
Flying hovercraft.

Surprised some people are already losing patience, it’s only been a couple weeks
Yes flying hovercraft from bf4 and bf2042
The next bf game will probably have bugs because it’s battlefield

get the right people invited based on racial backgrounds 😂
Its been almost a month, but like...they have already told us exactly what to expect, yet people still lose patience.
- The playtests are closed, and have an NDA.
- You only have a tiny chance to be invited
- You will receive an email if you are invited, keep an eye on your email.

They already had enough people for other Playtests before so why should this one be so much difficult?
I’m looking at it with the mindset that I won’t see a smidge of it at all regardless, but maybe the people who haven’t looked into it all that much must think it’s going to be some closed beta
Seen a few people saying: "When do we get invites to the beta"
Because this one is going to have more extensive feedback than past ones. Past playtests for it weren't even labelled as for the next Battlefield.
Its not just a case of....Get a playable build > Invite X players > have them play it
Its a case of having all their feedback systems in place before a single player is even invited.
All previous Playtests had Feedback lol But they mostly just didnt listen at all and just ignored it like with 2042s Playtests
Since they will also be releasing public info n the playtests, and results of those playtests, they also need to make sure that their documentation systems for player feedback, and the results of that feedback are effective
You cant just YOLO this shit like most of you want
Huh
Wuh
you guys acting like Dice is competent at listening the players
I thought I left a comment nvm
I believe in dice
after the last couple of years you shouldnt
Anyways should mavs come back
I want to
Their now lead producer is proven to be great at listening to player feedback, and implementing working test environments.
Thank you
And given how people have given feedback in channels here in the past I imagine they won’t leave open text boxes to go crazy in for these tests, can’t imagine what it must be like going through thousands of hand written messages, half of which don’t relate to the test at all
Tbh, just because the Team has a decent Dev in the Team, i wouldnt have that much hope.
2042s issue wasnt the devs, it was the creative vision.
Rush developed
Sure it was buggy, but the core of 2042 at launch just wasnt even a battlefield game.
The core being broken is a much bigger issue than the bugginess
that core comes from design and creative vision. Which (IMO) was bad
Like i just wanna remind you of xDefiant

How does this relate?
Good Producer doesnt equal a good game
The game that delayed itself purely because of player criticism and listened to player feedback to change its overall aesthetic?


