#battlefield-labs-discussion
1 messages · Page 36 of 1
I like seeing some of the genuinely cool stuff people make with them, and would love to use them to make a titanfall faction badge, but the bad stuff gets old real quick
hiding emblems doesn't stop them from existing, same with chat messages. There's a reason they have a tos
ok and i didnt say i expect them or say they need them
im explaining on how they can add things back to a game if they just add things to allow ppl to not see it. Toxicity will always be there. So allows way for ppl to not see it instead of removing things
toxicity will always be there yes, that's exactly why they removed player created emblems
yes. and they can add them back if they just add a few things for players to not see them
"allowing people to not see it" isn't a solution
they still need to moderate emblems
ok so what stops me from having a bad name on steam and launching bf and ppl seeing my name say somethign toxic
steam tos?
you'll get reported and have your name changed or account banned lmao
with how you saying. they need to remove names
so do the same????
well no because names are a necessary part of an online game lol
and it's much easier to control names which are made of letters, instead of emblems which are literally art pieces
or add a feature to allow ppl to not see it so they dont need to hire ppl to look through it
Not gonna lie if I owned a platform I wouldn't want people using it to spread hate symbols.
again "allow people to not see it" is not a solution
Names are integral to your identity, A symbol is not.
God I had this convo 3 years ago now
no
4 years
Jesus fucking christ.
ok bro. So then txt chat is in game and ppl type bad things. And they get banned but come back and say it when ban is lifted. What you gonna do? what did ppl do? Ask for a way to just not see it. So they add it and it worked
they don't want that shit on their platform, and try to control every emblem made is way more effort, time, and money than just disabling emblems, which isn't even essential to gameplay
It would be fun to have a pie as an emblem but I ain't gonna cry.
they're still being banned
and then those get banned
sooo
And they have to buy the game again.
what is your point
the cycle continues
so just let ppl NOT SEE THEM
how is this relevant
the problem isn't people seeing it's the emblems being on their platform
Cause the point it that ppl see them
no
its not a issue its there. its a issue ppl see them
People aren't gonna spend 60 - 100 dollars for the same game to do the same shit unless they're super dedicated to spread their shit anyways.
the point is dice doesn't want literal hate speech on their platform
jesus
not seeing it isn't a solution as i've said like 3 times
the problem is moderating it
How is this so difficult to understand? @bronze mirage
which is not feasible, as we've seen many times before
its always gonna be there if ppl can have a user name, txt chat, voice chat, bullet holes in surfaces, ontop of many things. Cant remove all of it cause some ppl use them
and most ppl still dont get banned
you cannot moderate emblems with as little effort as you moderate voice and text chat
your suggestion is literally having a guy sitting at a desk sifting through tens of thousands of emblems 24/7
think a little
CAN, but they usually dont EVER moderate vc, and txt chat dont get moderated hardly.
Problem; username is a integral part of your identity, text chat and voice chat serves as a possible means of teamwork. Emblems add literally nothing of value to gameplay.
i said have a hide option
which is NOT a solution
Not gonna lie. Their moderating is pretty on point for text chats.
I've been actioned, A racist I know has been actioned in the manner of hours.
Is this about bringing emblems back?
so if i go and type something in bf saying toxic things. i gurantee you i dont get banned
Yeah
Yessir
Bad timing
then i say something i dont get banned
you will
keep doing it and you will, naturally
oh, unfortunately unfeasible these days 
then i look for a option to hide things cause someone say something bad. and its not there
so they keep saying it
I've been suspended off EA services for a week for my shitty behaviour, If I kept up at it I would be actioned even harder.
uh NO. i have a buddy who say WILD shit and never happens
all day every day NO ban
"people don't get banned over text so let them make emblems to spread hate"
lucky him
i mean you say ppl get banned but they dont. most games allow chat hide cause they know you cant ban ppl fast enough or at all sometimes cause they fall under the rader. So ad a hide function
its literally a setting option
thats used in MANY games
it's a bandaid fix because there's still actual moderation being done
that EVERYONE loves in any game with toxic players
hiding emblems but still not having moderation isn't a solution
cause they know its better to hide than wait 12 months for a ban. that may not happen
most games will have you suspended or banned very quickly
overwatch does it within a few days if you're toxic all the time
Run a hate symbol and see how quickly they act.
is that why it never happened?
i really don't care about your experience
it's a fact that it does
and this is still completely irrelevant to emblems
ive seen 1 person banned cause of toxic chat in a game. It was Valo when it came out. Sense then NEVER.
good for you
a setting to not see it makes no sense to not add if its an issue
Hiding it doesn't remove it, it'd still need moderation.
removing 15 different features cause of players is sad cause you dont want to add measures to reduce toxicity
ok but they aren't removing 15 features
Hiding will make it worse lol
Like dude what
"Haha you get offended over hate symbols just disable it jackass"
That's essentially what you are saying.
all you can do is talk about text chat and make up imaginary scenarios lmao emblems cannot be moderated and there is no other way for them to return
if you chose to hide it then you dont see it. How is that worse?
Because people can openly run with hate symbols in a platform that's intended for fun?
because then nobody will report emblems and everyone is free to make heinous shit
Like dude I don't want to see some 16 year old edgelord running a swastika in a game where I just want to shoot people.
& it's a liabiltiy from a business standpoint.
And if you just hide them you dont see them, so you dont get hate symbols in your game?
You still do though
"we added emblems guys, and we know everyone is using it to spread hate but don't worry, you can just not look at it! We won't be doing anything else about this."
Honestly I would say this conversation demonstrates well enough why emblems should not be a thing.
You actually have short term memory.
every day i thank the universe that fans are NOT making video games because holy shit they're stupid
This is the culture that will propagate around it.
and you wont see it so only the bad ppl will. And nobody is upset cause we cant moderate it as you said
Not seeing it doesn't mean it doesn't exist, dude.
they can't moderate it so they can't add it. Simple as that. Hiding emblems is not a solution for the 10th time you knob
in what world is not seeing something stopping it from existing?
EA hosting a platform where people can openly run such filth with a bandaid fix of merely hiding it just won't end well at all.
If not doing things cause controversy was a thing, then there would be no counrty. Cant just ignore issues and take things from ppl cause of a small minority use things wrong
it's an emblem
get over yourself
What?
People who use hate symbols know VERY well what they're doing.
There's no beating the bush.
As much as I would like to have the Recce Tree as my emblem in a future BF game, I realize the realities of online communities, hence I would rather not see emblems at all in any future BF game.
There's bashing the faschy but that's another thing!
The risk vs reward is so insanely skewed towards the risk side that it's not even funny.
If you have an option to not see it. Then your fine. If they remove it, then there plenty of ppl out there upset cause now its
"Man i miss old bf where i could make my own emblem cause these ones suck, and i liked seeing ones that ppl had that were cool back in the day. But we cant cause ppl out there cry cause they are FORCED to see them."
It's not the end of the world either.
maybe the solution is for people to not create hate symbols? that could work no? If people aren't disgusting scumbags then there's no need for moderation. Until then we won't have emblems
It's that simple.
seeing them is not the problem
once again
i mean whats stopping someone from shooting a swaztika into a wall????
Absolutely not. I am not emotionally or sexually fixated on the appearance or disappearance of emblems, as opposed to Solar39, apparently.
or shooting the N word into a wall?
you seem to think the only thing wrong with hateful emblems is the fact that people see them, which is just ???
If some one came here with a swastika right now, Even if I blocked them it's a still a problem for the discord because they're allowing the account with the hate symbol run free.
bullet holes are important to gameplay and immersion, they disappear over time, and people need to go out of their way mid-game to do it. Emblems do nothing for gameplay or immersion, and they can be created once and then forgotten about
Guys pushing the goalposts now.
Not seeing =/= not being a problem.
I don't understand how this is so difficult to understand.
ok, and theres nothing that can do to stop that from already being done. It like removing the whole channel as a whole cause ppl cant use it as it was made for
the fact that this guy wants emblems so bad he's willing to let all sorts of gross hateful shit be created and plastered around in the game
they can ban them and delete the message, hope this helps
Guy must have some really epic emblems /s
Yes and that's the whole point in moderation because you can act on them.
they can do that with emblems cough cough
Remove them from the place.
it's not comparable
chat moderation can be very easily automated, and edge cases can be looked at by a human. Emblems have to be 100% moderated by a human
Your point is that they can moderated yes we get that and as a whole EA would rather not deal with that shit considering the sheer number of reports and bullshit they have to deal with.
it takes ONE person to go through over 100,000 emblems a day. 5 ppl on it and you good.
minimum wage ez
little to no money
Damn dude you don't believe people should be paid for their efforts?
It takes one removal of a mechanic to not have to bother with even that.
Not gonna lie ignoring how stupid of a thing you said there, 100K emblems in a day are you serious lol.
its lookin at a image and goin "nah thats racist". Dont need nothing more
"it's so easy just hire 5 extra people to work nonstop every day"
3 sec max to see if its offensive
this guy has to be like 12 years old
I am so happy you are not in control of any Discord servers I am part of.
100K is a stupid claim in itself.
ah yes cause all jobs are non stop 24/7.
100K sounds like something that would take an entire day.
they will be doing it the entire work day if they want any chance of staying on top of it
100K is tonnes.
guy thinks they'll just be looking at a screen pressing Y or N lmao
Yall think theres gonna be over 1mil reports a day.... Maybe in the first week but 3 months later. Not close
Yeah this guy is on purpose a moron.
it has to be some high level bait
It would stay as a problem years down the line
I'm debating whether this is just a troll we're dealing with.
Might as well just remove vc and txt chat tbh
just read the chat
we've explained a million times why that's not the same thing
if you can read
Are you literate or do you just have a really shitty text-to-speech/speech-to-text engine doing the work for you?
nah cause theres so many ppl saying bad things in vc and txt. They possibly cant control it
according to yall
that different
Isn't chat moderation something that is required by law?
discord has alot less ppl in it. Alot easier to monitor. Ontop of like 6 ppl here ready to report it with a screen shot and a dev likely reading this actively. COMPLETLY different from a game
and also already has good tools created to moderate it
^
it's the exact same
like i said, try it and see what happens
but its not, cause theres not 1k other people also doing it, with devs lookin at chat rn.
ok now your trolling if u think its the exact same thing
things on larger scale need more moderation. Things with less ppl needs less cause its alot easier to catch
discord chat has alot less ppl in here. Its not spread across 12 different servers, among different active session, being said into a mic or typed and waiting a report to detect and have a dev to look over it a week later
you dont know how moderation works.
Do it right now.
Why not going towards a more limited tool, similar to what MGS 5 was offering ? With no infinite layers of shapes that can be rotated and resized no chance to see something offensive.
So, February is ending, and they said first playtest would be this month, anyone has any info about it?
srry bro. they gonna say no cause theres no way to allow them apparently
Who said this month?
they said in the coming weeks, which sounds soon but doesn't really mean anything
Do you mean preset emblems?
I read somewhere, and they said something about in the upcoming weeks, that was when the labs was revealed, just wondering if they called someone already
Ah. Yeah.
you won't know until they announce it or you get invited yourself, it's all under nda
But I can't really say anything because I don't actually know and if I actually did I can't exactly confirm or deny.
Ironically
I am gonna deny
Understood, thanks guys
Glomar response, my beloved.
I am hopeful though.
You don't need a leak or rumour to be confident in the direction under Sirland.
That'd be funny.
They already passed a few months ago
they already passed... rest in pieces
Where is my invite?
hello 0/ i'm trying to find why i cant talk to french channel
Could battelfiel 4 commander mode return?
you want say « could battlefield 2 commender mode return?»
i don´t have the luch play any battelfiel before bf3
it's a self destructing email
don't respond in time, it goes poof 
new discovery in the trailer
if you pause the trailer at the right frame, and zoom in on one of the windows, you can see a naked lady
further analysis has confirmed that this lady is, in fact, Falck
ok.
gooners cannot be stopped holy shit
Anyways, I'm debating whether PDWs might be better suited to be divided into SMGs and PCCs/Sub-Compact Carbines.
the question is easily solved - if it has a similar damage profile, why not?
besides, sub compact carbines are usually high speed low drag type of stuff
*in game terms
Yeah, I think the SMGs/Sub-Compact Carbines might be an idea since they're pretty distinct from each other as opposed to SMGs/PCCs since PCCs are kind of a civilian semi-auto compromise.
Take the SIG MPX for instance, the PCC variant is different only in barrel/handguard length.
Whereas there is a significant difference between something like an MP7 and a SCAR-L SC.
I'm rather torn though because I am a modularity nerd, so I think the SCAR-L carbines being able to be modified between SC and standard length (NOT on the fly) would be pretty cool.
Sup lads
I guess if carbines are going to be universally available like in BF4 it won't make much difference if PDWs remain a cover name for SMGs and carbines be able to be modified into sub-compact variants.
Good morning.
Yeah I'm sure they will have base categories and attachments to further drill down into detail if wanted
Then again maybe not curious if they bring back the plus system I didn't find it to be very useful
But will they add floating double damage power ups!
i think it should be:
- PDWs (.45cal and 9mm mostly)
- Carbine (aka short ARs lol)
- ARs
- Battle Rifles (SCAR H, big heavy caliber bois)
- Marksman (semi auto only)
- Snipers
- LMGs
- Shotties (gross)
- Handguns
- Wacky Shit (Mare's leg, crossbow, etc)
Please for the love of fucking god do not reintroduce the plus system, that shit was horrendous
agreed
I can see them bringing it back, cos its what most people state as a positive from 2042.
I dont want it either. Stating it as the best thing in 2042, is like saying weight loss is the best part of food poisoning.
I haven't talked to enough people to gauge general interest in the plus system, but I absolutely despise it with the firey passion of a thousand suns.
there is probably a better analogy in there
Almost every YT channel ive seen states they liked the plus system. Have also seen a lot of people on socials/discord stating the same. I liked it for what it is in 2042, but dont want it in future games.
I suppose in the 2042 universe it might make sense (since I haven't lived that long).
Being the best part of a bad thing is hardly a plus tho (Pun intended)
Ha, you funni man
Personal preference as of right now:
- Assault class
- Assault Rifles [Exclusive]
- Battle Rifles
- Shotguns
- Engineer class
- Carbines [Exclusive]
- Sub-Machine Guns
- Shotguns
- Support class
- Machine Guns (Light/Medium) [Exclusive]
- Battle Rifle
- Marksman Rifle
- Recce class
- Sniper Rifles [Exclusive]
- Sub-Machine Guns
- Marksman Rifle
I'd like quite an extensive selection of firearm models with some subvariants as well, something in the region of 75-80 base weapons extending into 120-140 with subvariants included.
Edit: For context, BF4 has 101 guns total and Hardline has 94 total.
I realize I am being a gear nerd here but I really, really like firearms.
BF4 also has the problem of guns being like 1:1 stats wise
I understand where you're coming from with that argument, and I used to be in the same camp of "less is more" but was convinced by someone in this Discord that similar weapon systems are good for variety.
I never cared TBH. I just enjoyed having more things to play with, different sounding weapons, eTC
Being able to be competitive with multiple different weapon systems is better than having only 1 or 2 available to be competitive.
BF4 had it perfect tho:
If they do interesting things with recoil and attachments im all for it
Yeah, I like the BF4 distribution but would prefer some more granular control over the appearance of my weapon systems because, as previously disclosed, I am a firearms nerd.
would rather sell emblems and stickers than to allow people to make their own custom emblems, this whole emblem thing is a moot convo
Not giving recon carbines and shotuns will just make them less played.
Night as well call them a sniper class without
And I do not want to have twenty different separate variants of the same platform, so I would prefer being able to customize the appearance to fit the user's preferences.
If they had +1 beyond the universal ones I'd like it more
Fair point, I might do a switcharoo and modify that.
I will admit I hold a fierce hatred for shotguns, and generally don't use them as a primarily recce class player.
Realistically, you would have both universal weapons, but also a more robust class specialization system, to make a player of a specific class more prone to using that classes weapons
2042s specialization was not really all that good/useful
Maybe with the exception of assault and recon perks
But the recon one I kinda found useless, cos you barely ever need infinite breath
Yeah, I do like the idea of specializations. I used to prefer having different availability of weapon systems per specialization but I think, for lack of a better word, "proficiencies" with different categories might be better.
I will never like carbines
Giving everyone an AR isn't a good decision imo
Like you could make specializations have positives and negatives. Example: A recon specialization for removal of scope glint. But said removal makes your hold breath duration 50% lower.
If there is going to be a carbine class then it should be like BF3, only engi gets carbine, SMGs are universal
Also works
I could settle for that, to be quite honest.
Time to do another switcharoo.
Engineers are relatively frontlines soldiers in BF games. So giving them a weapon class that is similar to ARs makes sense.
How about:
- Assault class
- Assault Rifles [Exclusive]
- Battle Rifles
- Shotguns
- Engineer class
- Carbines [Exclusive]
- Sub-Machine Guns
- Shotguns
- Support class
- Machine Guns (Light/Medium) [Exclusive]
- Battle Rifle
- Marksman Rifle
- Recce class
- Sniper Rifles [Exclusive]
- Sub-Machine Guns
- Marksman Rifle
I feel like 4 available categories were slightly too much, hence I have reduced it to 3.
remove marksman from support and I agree
I think marksman should be recon exclusive for shorter range engagements
they already got battlerifles anyway
Marksman rifles to me make sense for support as they are support oriented. It maintains the medium range "specialization" for the Support class but still gives capability in that blended area between medium and long-range.
Basically, I view the categories for support as:
- Machine Guns: Medium Range
- Battle Rifle: Close-to-Medium Range
- Marksman Rifle: Medium-to-Long Range
So centered around the medium range bracket.
Marksman should be universal imo given no one uses them
People don't use DMRs because of controllers imo 
I abuse the living shit out of the Mk 11 Mod 0 in BF4.
Just copy this stuff into ChatGPT and have it arrange it into a grid. Makes it easier to digest 😛
No image perms :(
oh yeah lol
Only semi auto assault rifle in BO6 got like 4-5 buffs since the game launched with no nerfs despite general AR nerf, it's legit broken now but no one uses it 
Modern shooter players are just afraid of DMRs, I think it's due to them being used to controllers, it's harder to tap fire with rollers
I just get along far too well with the fire rate of the Mk 11.
I can use the SCAR-H SV that has the same ROF and perform absolutely horrendously, but with the Mk 11 Mod 0 I can do pretty well in almost all scenarios.
I rarely see people use DMRs in 2042 too, even the SVK despite it being broken
Modern gamers are just not used to semi auto firing weapons
Haven't played 2042 in ages but I loved the DM7 and G428 quite a lot.
I still cant put my finger on why use of those weapons feels bad. But if I were to guess, id say its because of the different movement speeds. Surely that makes it harder to learn movement speeds/patterns
Definitely an acquired taste, though.
DMRs generally or do you mean specifically those in 2042?
It's weird too because controller's best weapon is probably DMR on account of the 25% reduction in recoil and first shot multi.
ranged DMRs/sniper rifles in 2042
Ah, I see. Yeah, it took a long time for me to learn the movement speeds and required lead with my preferred DMRs. I never ventured that far into sniper rifles because it was just too much for my little brain.
Only VCAR feels bad imo, Trench Carbine was amazing, VCAR ain't it
vcar the 🐐 DMR in 2042
VCAR is for people with reflexes, not old people like me
VCAR is just a CQC gun it's not a typical DMR.
it's under the marksman rifle category, so it's a marksman rifle 
that's DICE's fault for not making it a utility category gun 
I like that they call it utility because you have guns with zero utility and you have weapons that are better than other weapons within their own category.
frfr
It's called as tactical
Only thing i didnt like with bf4s was Recon having Carbines. It made them capable of running AR's with a spawn beacon. Was kinda annoying imo having a Sniper class running around with a AR and putting beacons down next to sight for his team with no risk of being out gunned... Also making back caps ALOT easier. Im ok if they have dmr's that can toggle full auto for some of them like the Mk14 and other weapons that wold fit in the dmr category but are capable of full auto. But no AR like a G36 or ACR.
I'm very on the fence about PCCs. On one hand they'd be cool, on the other hand, they're kinda just glorified SMGs.
At least in military settings, that is.
Yeah, the discussion below this, we talked about replacing carbines with SMGs as all class, then making carbines the engineer exclusive weapon (Instead of SMG)
yeah i scrolled past and saw the pick and read it. I like everything else bf4 did class wise. Just that 1 thing bothered me.
Oh shit, wait
I completely forgot to respond to this; I really like the idea of having something to remove scope glint, but I think the tradeoff is fairly obvious (depending on the implementation). Generally the only way to "completely" eliminate scope glint is to use tape to cover up a large portion of the objective lens, or cut a small window in the lens caps. Thus, I think a more restricted field of view would be a reasonable trade-off for that kind of thing.
Isnt that what the whatever pistol with stock already?
I don't remember the name of it
whoops, mp28 doesn't look like a glock 
ANYONE ELSE JUST GET AN EMAIL
No, and neither did you.
Battlefield Labs | Registration Complete this is what mine said i thought it would be good news but i think its just a remnder for the survey
Not much need to think about anything. The content of that email is pretty clear. It also tells you not to share it, but who reads things these days.
I'll just report that to Paradox for breaking the NDA 
okay big guy
NO PROBLEM, BE SURE TO UPDATE US ON YOUR NEXT EMAIL TOO /S
why are you crying
No NDA signed yet, just a reminder that there's a CK3 playtest on the way
Speaking to the other guy
did they say yet what the next DLC is gonna be?
Idk didn't read it all too carefully since I am not interested in the series
Meming on on on them tho, cos there are 50 guys doing the same thing here daily lol
it was a simple question guy relax
YES I GOT ONE FROM UBISOFT 2 YEARS AGO
to playtest xdefiant
I hear that's the next big thing. 😅
I am reporting you to Ubisoft's HQ amidst bankruptcy.

You'll have to beta test Ubisoft games like everyone else, on release 
I feel bad for that title, you could tell from the start they didn't have a concrete design or concept figured out and it really hurt the process.
By the time they got to something it was too late to course correct a lot of the issues stemming from earlier choices
They were beta testing for like 4 years and never addressed the main complaints people had
They share alot of the blame themselves 
shitty netcode that they didn't acknowledge until 2 whole seasons into the game
That's also true, how do you test for like a year and never fix the problems with the netcode.
Every test was like "get rid of the spider, fix the dying around cover"
Seriously me and the other testers complained so much and they responded with: "yeah we'll fix it ok don't worry"
which is understandable if it's in alpha, not really when you've been doing it for like 4 years and it's still an issue months after launch

It's even funnier when the players think "Oh well if Ubisoft is selling then someone will buy XDefiant and fix the game!" but the aesthetics of XDefiant includes Ubisoft IPs so someone would basically have to buy out Ubisoft completely 
BO6 killed the remaining fanfare behind the game honestly
So poorly managed, atleast some excuses can be attributed to 2042 
I hope a deep dive comes out about the game
I also found it weird how their biggest defining point was IBMM and they said "fuck it mix inputs in ranked"
What the hell were Mark Rubin and his team doing with those hundreds of millions
blowing it on hookers and drinks?
Ain't no party like an Ubisoft party. At least as long as we don't talk about Randy Pitchford
They had a solid foundation with xd but couldn't follow up on it 
Nah they didn't even have a foundation until a few years of testing
OG XDefiant felt less like CoD and more like some weird hero shooter
But at least XDefiant lasted longer than Concord.
Well, I'm gonna miss hotshot. That was a fun spin on TDM/Kill Confirmed
XDefiant still feels like a really really really bad hero shooter
ah, so a 7/10, then? 
Yo guys i got invited. Invited to go fishing this weekend
Enjoy, I hear the fishing in Norway is fucking amazing.
Been fishing my entire life, love it.
In the summer we go out at 8pm and fish to like 6am since it doesnt get dark out 😂
I got an invite to collect inheritance from a distant relative in another country my heritage draws nothing from, seems legit to me. Catch you later broke boys.
Midnight sun gang

only 2 years ago? i was invited as a playtester to xdefiant in early 2022. but i never actually played it lol

I played in the 2022 one and the big 2023 one or whenever that happened which they opened up to console too
Or whenever the final one was, I lost track of them
Time has fun when you're going fast.
time doesnt exist
We are stalling
Time is an illusion, lunchtime doubly so.
Playtests are just an illusion to keep us trapped with the realm of time
when beta test battleSIX
pre-alpha even
Surely we'll get news next week... right?
You sure are swimming in an ocean of hopes and dreams.
Never assume, never expect. Just be pleasantly surprised if and when it happens 😄
Tbf I can't say I am not doing the same.
For a pleasant surprise some form of expectation is needed
What if I expect it to happen next week, but it happens this friday? (hypothetical, obviously)
I don't think that's how surprises work 
A surprise is something that you were not expecting
or are not
Philosophy ain't my thing as you can tell
I think I get what you mean, gotchya
Not particularly
argh, that christmas hat avatar scared me
ive been sent the same email to fill out a survey 5x
another one today, anyone know what's shaking?


from having in depth game mechanic conversations to talking about patience philosophy
at this point i just want new concept art

that's why I love this channel
This is a channel for discussing anything from the bottom of the Mariana's Trench to the peak of Mount Everest and everything inbetween. And also sometimes everything above that.
and sometimes Battlefield
And pizza
and popcorn
Oh yes, popcorn and your popcorn seasoning for sure 
:D

Well, talking about philosophy sure is more interesting than talking about Battlefield at the moment...
what about battlefield philosophy?
To shoot or not to shoot, that is the question
Hobbyist.
"Do I shoot and reveal my position, or do I hold out for a better opportunity?"
Me.
There's a dude on Reddit trying to tell me that medics use snipers.
In real life.
If the situation requires it.
Weeeeeeeeell, it depends on what the person means by sniper. Knowing this is the interwebz it's likely the person in question means marksman rifles.
That's exactly what he means
Said medic could run a LMG/MMG based off of his argument
In that case, yes, CLS personnel can be armed with marksman rifles.
Like actually
That I have a harder time believing and have never heard of occuring.
This dudes argument is that depending on the sitatuion, you can be assigned any gun, so that's why all classes having all guns in 2042 is "realistic"
Yes, the marksman in a regular infantry section/squad is usually a more accurate rifleman, providing the same effect in terms of firepower as a regular rifleman (obviously situation dependent) so it's possible that they might be dual-roling as a combat life saver and designated marksman.
Oh, yeah no.
Sorry, I misunderstood
You don't put a dedicated sniper rifle in the hands of a medic.
Nor a MMG.
Though it is somewhat common practice for sniper teams to be qualified as combat life savers which is like the step below an actual combat medic.
MMGs — and I would argue LMGs as well — are never assigned to combat life savers or combat medics.
He just used it as an argument to have all weapons available to all classes
Tell him he's delusional and send my regards.
Just so you know, I'm not really taking this seriously, I'm just curious
fuck, curiously is a word now
Tragic times.
Okay, send me your address and a few thousand dollarydoos.
Nah, I gotta cover my travel expenses and the disposable weapon.
You should adjust your situation to my needs
Although, I could probably just stare at a piece of sheet metal and it would assume the form of a FP-45 Liberator.
Damn bro you sound so cool and tuff talking in the internet
He’s still typing
Him = you
On a serious note though: Sniper rifles, whether semi-automatic (as the US Army tried to do) or bolt-action, are never assigned to regular infantry soldiers in the first place. They're a specialist weapon system and as such require extensive training to use to their fullest potential, hence why sniper courses are pretty difficult to both be allowed to attend and then receive a passing grade.
Marksman rifles, however, are pretty common in regular infantry units so it's definitely possible for a combat life saver (CLS) to be given a marksman rifle and be expected to fill both the role of marksman and CLS.
I don't think so, erm. Actually, medics can sprint with 20 kilograms of gear, swiftly aim their sniper rifle, and take out a target at the distance of 300 hundrer meters.
No training needed.
Ah yes, I forgor.
CLS means what, exactly?
Combat Life Saver.
The tactical medical chain is usually divided into roughly two levels of care:
- Combat Life Saver — Provides the initial life saving care, hence the title. Usually found at the fireteam level, though not that often an official title held by the person.
- Combat Medic — Provides additional care for the casualty and then arranges medical evacuation (if necessary), can be found at squad level in the US Army, in some other armies at platoon level and up.
Yes, but I like to talk about this subject.
Some armies/units have additional levels of care in their tactical combat casualty care (TCCC) chain, but usually the TCCC looks like that and then terminates when the casualty is evacuated. After that it's a lot more complex.
We need to add this to Battlefield as classes. /j again because I'm fucking funny bro
You're going into the lands that are not beknown to me
I know, but I am a nerd for medical and sniper stuff.
I will promptly shake my head in the upward and downward motion respectively and pretend I know what you mean
Very good.
Really interesting
I agree.
My desire is that your glamorous way of expressing oneself transfers itself into my frontal lobe, so that I, too, can integrate such noble words into my life and carry myself around with pride.
I wish you good fortune and luck in your endeavors to achieve this goal for yourself.
or shall I say
lmao good luck fam
it just occurred to me just how brainrotted i am
because "combat life saver" sounds verbose
Aren't we all brainrotten
no
You miss-spelled on, which means something is opened, meaning you want your mind to open, which means you realize the brainrot you suffer, which means yes to @spice bramble's question

I thought I was capable of insane thought acrobatics, but this man has just put me to shame in that arena.
I'll soon put you to shame in the linguistics arena, you pretentious amateur. You shall bite the dust.
I do not believe ad hominem attacks at my character are warranted, let alone necessary under these circumstances. Qua a qualified internet stranger, I shall however wish you a very pleasant evening and a happy midsummer's eve.
Or something, that was just me ad libbing.
Aaaaanyways, I shall now depart for the remainder of the evening so as to enjoy my recurring free-of-charge death demo commonly referred to as "sleep".
Sorry, I was in character.
So was I, no worries.
Did anyone got an email yet of the battlefield labs access ?
Good night! 
It was last week
Be careful with replies, cos most people are askng about emails they expect to receive after that initial mail.
Which no one has yet gotten
I was just trolling a bit 🥰

My Welcome Back Screen (Playtests Available doesn't say Battle field labs anymore is that normal ? Am I still enrolled ?
it means you've signed up
Mine never showed that 🤔
mines did and then i did another (extra) survey on the site and it disappeared
that's what i thought then i did an extra survey and it disappeared i hope that didn't ruin my chances
same i did the second survey and now i cant see it in the playtests anymore
mann i hope we are good lol
i hope so,in my other alt account i received the same email but without the survey which is weird
I guess this pretty much confirms that my odds of getting in are 0 now
You better provide good feedback boys! 🙂
If you dont see the playtest in the welcome back screen then you are in
Well I never received the survey email you are talking about 🙃
I did two surveys but never from an email, straight from the labs website 🤷🏻♂️
But it was like a week and a half ago
So again, I don't think I'm in the same train anymore, mine got lost on the country Side 🤣
in the play test ? for the signup for play test ?
yes
yes to which question ?
I said that if he dont see the battlefield playtest anymore that means maybe he is in too
I don't think that has anything to do with if you're in or not, I think it's just the website's fault on showing that to some people while for others it's already disappeared from day 1
Super confusing, but we know that whether you're in or not depends on if you get an email from playtesting at ea dot com or not
for me this happend only in 1 of my 3 accounts
ive signed up with my other 2 accounts but never received any confirmation or survey but only received the confirmation in my 3rd account and now i cant see the battlefield playtest anymore in the playtest list,but on my other accounts i can still see it in the playtests
I signed up on day one and only just received the email saying you've signed up. 1.3 million people signed up so I'm guessing it's a back log tbh
Why tf do u need to sign up with 3 accounts,,
U aware thats against the user agreement?
because i have 3 accounts many years
But why
Ive bought different games
and i was competitive back then and wanted to smurf in other games
U could sign in with the same acc on different games. U aware u just self reported urself? 💀
okay bro good luck finding my other accounts

so when does the playtest start
🤷♂️

guys my bflabs.exe is crashing 🙀 how do i fix it 🤔
You don't need deep dive to understand BO6's issues. It has 0 original maps, almost all the maps are taken from Warzone POIs, SBMM is thicker than ever leading to frusturating matches, non existent anti cheat and it being on gamepass means cheaters will infest it. Cheaters are even a bigger issue in a game with SBMM because any deviation of skill will be extremely noticeable in a lobby when you are used to playing against your own clones.
I didnt know u were allowed to talk about the playtest and being participated to playtest
Im pretty sure battlefield labs said its closed playtesting, so there cant be any talk or evidence of it. But idk maybe im wrong
its a joke
playtest hasn't even started yet
O lol im sorry i have autism 😭 i thought u was srs
fallen for the bait 😭
I guess? I just thought u were srs n didnt see it as a joke bc of my autism
what does autism have to do with it just curious
I cant tell social queue stuff, esp online. So i can never tell if someone is joking or being srs. Its similar to how i cant tell if ppl r joking about me or bullying me
ah thats fair, tho tbf i was lowkey making it sound half-serious for the reason to bait people in anyways so dw
I also didnt know playtests didnt start yet too tho lol
yeah who knows, hopefully ea at least tells us that they've started it, not leaving people in the dark and just wondering
Its ok, no hard feelings. I hope they atleast say what quarter of the year it will be
For playtests
You just got trap 
?
Soontm
goodnight!
DON'T ADD SKILL BASED DAMAGE!
Skill based damage isn't real
I do believe they are running bots on multiplayer though 
They also seem to have skill based spawns, whenever I die I spawn in front of enemies, no one spawns in front of me though
I meant XDefiant if you scrolled a bit up 😅
Oh my bad
Conspiracy theories!
They are still sending mails
EA doesn't even send me ''thank you for reporting cheaters'' mails anymore 
They only do that when they get banned
the next battlefield should include full-auto shotguns
Lmao, I actually wouldn’t mind that.
I love full auto shotguns.
They don’t get enough love.
It’s always pump-action or semi automatic.
Next BF should include SBMM/EOMM
Next BF should include no anti-cheat.
👆
I did actually have a CV9035 MkIIIc in my dream.
Dice, i know you're "COOKING" as people say now, but please release the playtest 🥺🤣
Holy crash out.
ayy im starvin for some new bf content brother
this aint have to be a playtest tho
some trillers or anything will do
Here your revel will be leaks
can't talk about leaks here it's the official discord
||2042 ||will most likely get new content next week 
meh
i need smthin freash
smtin like
idk
new bf xD
youre acting as if youve never experienced a good game drought that lasted longer than 5 years
For me its been a BF game drought since BF1 😛
(BFV was fine, but I was so sick of the WW era by the time it released. BF1 felt more like a WW2 shooter than a WW1 shooter)
air
Whoever would have imagined that a World War 1 game heavily reliant on experimental weapons that were further developed and put into use in World War 2 would feel more like a WW2 game than WW1
surprised pikachu face
Agree BF1 was last great Battlefield
Also last game with premium
been so unfortunate for me in that sense. Couldn't play bf1 or v until several years after their launches, 2042 comes out and i'm all prepped to play but then it ends up like it did
super unlucky
BFV is kinda foggy to me, cos I played it lots at launch and enjoyed it. But then I was working away from home for like...9 months. When I returned and started playing again, I really didnt like it all that much anymore.
that's a shame
So I kinda just stopped playing it
BFV has semi good vehicle combat, but apart from that, it has some of the worst maps unfortunately
out of like 15 maps only 2/3 might be worth playing
Vehicles in BFV felt good. They felt powerful from what I remember.
still waitin for bloodborn pc port
;33
Unpopular opinion; there should be not full-auto or burst-fire pistols in-game.

fair enough tbh
I don't really care, automatic handgun in 2042 is a peashooter anyways, it could've been cool to have an SMG-like sidearm but it's just bad
I wouldn't mind them as much if they were locked to a specific class, but having every single class have access to either a full-auto or burst-fire pistol seems to just result in everyone using that one.
I liked how Hardline did it where different classes had access to different categories of pistols.
BF1 had class specific sidearms too
I know the G57 in 2042 was/is ridiculously good, in my view partially due to the burst, and based on recent experience in BF4, practically no one uses anything other than G18.
I enjoyed shooting that LZ pistol they added, but it does really crappy damage IIRC
Oh, the Laugo Alien pistol in 2042? LZ-9 or something if memory serves. I liked that pistol, but as you said, its damage output is rather pathetic.
Yeah, that one. Feels good to shoot, has nice audio...but the damage makes it useless. when it comes to sidearms, I just want the one that can kill 1,2 or 3 people if im in a bind. Deagle and M44 are technically better, but I dont like skill cannons. Im old lol
Deagle is more of a spam cannon
Deagle has like 200 ms TTK with CC, legit kills faster than SMGs
Other pistols are around 400 ms
Rex is also close to deagle
I just prefer the recoil, mag size and performance of the Glock.
I don't even want to kill 1, 2 or 3 people with my sidearm, I just want to use it to buy time or get out of a bind. If a secondary weapon can serve as essentially a primary weapon, what's the point of selecting any other secondary than that.
It would probably have been fine if they didnt also give it a drum mag 😄
Also a very valid point.
My favorite pistol, the m1911 is totally useless in 2042 tho
even with the extended mag it feels so terrible to use.
I kinda like it
Id hope the next game isnt afraid to let the side arms have decent performance
It's easier to use it hipfire only
Pistols in older games were strong, but limited by their mag size and ammo pool. So it was fine for them to be strong, as the availability was limited.
MP443 is most cost efficient in terms of bullets, you can kill 7 people with 28 round mag before a reload
They should have decent performance, but not exceed a primary weapon system of comparable caliber, in my opinion. Sidearms should be a "coup de grace" close range weapon and not be effective beyond the close range bracket.
And, again circling back to my initial point, not be fully-automatic or burst-fire, so as to promote more variety in what is carried.
Im fine with a sidearm outperforming some primaries, as long as they cant do it for an extended firefight. Just limmit the mag size and ammo pool
In short range, sure, but the damage drop-off should be pretty significant imo.
Ideally I want everything I shoot to feel lethal, not like a pea shooter
Yeah, like inside 10m they should be deadly AF
Exactly.
But beyond that they should start to decline quite quickly, whether through accuracy or pure damage output. Not saying it should suddenly drop to zero or any such radical change, but as BF4 did have a downward slope.
Turns out Rex one taps to the head up to 50 meters 
Could've been better than deagle and m44 combined if it had sight options honestly
Even just a single red dot
Welp, reddit is getting heated (won't say why, but easy to find)
Reddit gets heated every 5 minutes
Why they angry this time
I believe API man
Not angry, I meant heated as in excited
No leaks
All I see on the Battlefield reddit is shit posting "Should my cat be in the next Battlefield" 
All the comedians there are making posts like "Should Battlefield have Honda Accords?/ [insert actor]?/ [insert item]?
Armour Piercing Incendiary man?
Exactly
i was just about to post this here!
TLDR: don't expect anything before March 4th
@vague barn Guess I was right after all, eh? (after wrongly predicting it multiple times)
Perhaps, I'm not quite willing to hold my breath in anticipation for it though.
But, I am a rather skeptical individual when it comes to leaks.
Oh, you distrusting man!
You shall rejoice in anticipation!
Fuck, I'm not as good at talking like a snob as I thought
Indeed not.
Now we all have disappointment to look forward to on March 4th! (When nothing also happens on that day 🤣 )
March 4th is a day off for me, so I'll have all the pleasure to drown myself with booze once I notice no email in my inbox 🙃
If accepted, I might be able to download that by the time the playtest ends. /s
When the Open Beta launches which will be 60GB lol
guys uploading a new build doesn't mean they're gonna start the testing then 😭
this is like the people watching steamdb all over again
Something will happen, something will happen, SOMETHING WILL HAPPEN , something will happen ................
honestly man thats so fun
"guys the branch got updated we're totally getting something new this time"
you dont like the thrill of it?
i think it's a bit silly
it feels like im a kid again excited for something
i'm not that invested in any games atm though
Would you like a padded room and a straitjacket to go with that illusion?
well me neither, (maybe arc raiders) but still, i guess small things like this excites me
I mean, since they now publicly announced doing more "open" testing and not fully closed and hidden, this is something new. They said it will start in the coming weeks and this would just make the most sense
The amount of times I have seen the reasoning "it would make the most sense" is almost revolting.
Not saying it's impossible that we'll see something, but do restrain your expectations and optimism slightly.
There's a difference between theorizing for the sake of fun of the ride (and knowing that won't hurt you if that doesn't happen) but some people take it far by thinking it WILL happen on that day and then get sad or angry when it doesn't happen. I think the former is actually really fun and thrilling if you know what you're doing 😂
They changed the icon, tuff.
what icon
Server icon.
Unfortunately I am unable to prescribe a dose of pessimism to bring your expectations down, of course, but it is much better to be pleasantly surprised than disappointed.
Im to 70% confident something will happen, but if not, then i will just keep waiting
It's really on themselves
it's been that way for like a month
Naw man, it's white text over black now.
If you're theorizing without grains of sodium then it's your faul t
It was black text over white before.
are you inverted colorblind
lmao
Actually my Discord may be acting up
Hahaha hopefully, who knows
It's back to normal now.
BF labs is fully closed testing. WYM?
i'm 20% confident that there's a 60% chance of something happening
even if Invites are being sent out and people will leak the mails, i wont be invited

As you may surmise from my Discord bio, I do enjoy theorizing.
I said "Open", i know its a closed Alpha with a NDA
I will never betray my loyalty to Arc Raiders and that's why I'll always put BF7 2nd at best 😤
But before BF Labs was announced, we never knew that they were already playtesting the next BF
so thats why i said its more "open"
i think what helpmaster means is that dice are willing to be more "open" towards us in terms of recaps of cte's and shit
idk if that was the case with bf4, i only played on a ps3 without much cte knowledge (i dont think they had cte on ps3 either)
CTE wasnt really a secret thing since nearly everyone with a Premium Pass could join
There was no NDA on the BF4 CTE.
The BF4 CTE was a Community Test Environment as opposed to a Closed Test Environment.
Realistically we have no clue what will or will not be shown, and in what detail. Best to just wait and see.
Jesus, just looking at the Patches for the CTE, This was Patch 1: A significant addition in the patch was that the player tickrate was increased from 10Hz to 30Hz.
bsod you don't understand our childish nature of being excited for little crumbs dropped from anyone 😂 it's just a thing
10Hz is crazy
Almost like there's a reason it was increased.
That sounded excessively passive aggressive, apologies.
Wait, why does the BF Wiki say that BF4 was in Testing Phase for iOS lol
Commander Mode, probably.
Android isnt mentioned so idk if they either forgot it and mean the commander mode or idk
i just noticed why does the bf subreddit have a lot of "should the next battlefield...." posts 😂
oh no lol they wanted a port
" A port of the game for iOS is currently in development though it is unknown whether or not it will be released."
thats interesting
u sure thats not battlefield mobile
I hope commander mode comes back
Imagine playing BF4 on your iPhone 6 lol
nope
bfmobile was actually p fun, i hate that they just dropped it 😭
“It has been quite a challenge [to port Battlefield 4 to iOS],” said Frostbite Go’s program manager Kristoffer Benjaminsson.
oh damn
Because Reddit is an unholy hive of scum and villainy filled to the brim with life forms of equal competence and predictive qualities to those of a paralyzed goldfish.
i feel like mobile fps games that last over 20 minutes per match are in a VERY small niche
Playing shooters in general on a phone is meh
very true
pubgm takes a lot of time to get used to but still, brokethrough mobile gaming so hard
One way to put it.
the current iphones could easily have all the current BF games and the old one ported
It was running garbage on the 360/PS3, would literally be impossible on phones at the time without it looking like completely different
should the next battelfield be like bf4?
Not gonna lie, I do scroll on Reddit. I'm not deranged, however...
Well dice said they ported some parts of BF4 to iOS
It was meh for me.
I wonder when bf labs come out
Good they recognised it would fail and they cancelled it
I'm not deranged.
I have seen people locked in emergency psychiatric care wings of hospitals who have made similar statements.
totally not including the fact I had to vpn to Malaysia with like 130 ping just to try it 
If I say that I am deranged, will it make me not deranged?
It will make you aware of your condition.
Perhaps not having to talk about being deranged or not is the least deranged thing you can do
Easy way to farm karma
i love how all gamers are losing their mind. BF Players wanting to play the Playtest, HL Fans waiting for a announcement
And the general BF sub is genuinely senile.
They attack you for even implying you god forbid.. have fun with 2042
thats true, but a lot of those also feel very... cheap/low quality posts
90% of the discussion there is just rose tinted nostalgia jerking
When it launched, i would understand the "Hate", but now its a better game and can see people liking it
like someone says "should the next battlefield have an immersive atmosphere" no shit 😭 wtf is that question, that's the expectation
Seriously, go play those games you reminicise about, they're not dead 
i should fake a Mail of an Invite to troll the whole Subreddit lol
no
And for the ones that are, we all know a major reason why, not much reason to keep them up when barely anyone still touched them.
rose tinted is an understatement
I always say 2042 is a good game, just not a good Battlefield
I always say 2042 is a game.
:)
Lol just found a post "Can we remove these low effort "the next battlefield" posts? "
i wanna say bf hardline was a good game 😭
probably by me (jk)
if i say it im gonna be attacked by the bf3/bf4 lovers
"but.. BUT SIR"
BF3 WAS PEAK
Hardline was GREAT and I loved it
ur EU too, u can still enjoy the "FREE" server
"They have been going on for so long, this sub should be called BattlefieldCircleJerk
If you thought this sub was good before, you are blind and stupid"
its 40/64 right now on PC playing on Chinatown
Hardline was fine for what it is, but it's the Battlefield game that was least like what I would consider "Battlefield"
2042 is fine on that front tbh. The specialists are just pre-defined gadgets for classes for the most anyways
i think my most memorable experience in any bf games come from bf hardline, bfv and bf4.
Had some cool elements like Ziplines, Leaning out of cars etc
hotwire was a unique gamemode for what the game was
kinda reminded me of the finals' cashout gamemode
i liked that mode
Oh sure, just wish it had been in more a military setting on actual "battlefields" instead of cops and robbers in cities
Hardline had a few interesting ideas tbh. Different categories of sidearms, shared individual weapons from different categories, selective unlocking of equipment, etc.
In Battlefield Vietnam you could have jeeps hanging from wires below your helicopter and you could use it to bowl the jeep into things. Kinda want that again.
Also had the Bullet Spraying Pistol m/45B in Hardline, a completely useless weapon that I used for far too long.
i will say it was a bold switch-up, i lowkey think it was intentional so that BF1 stands out even more
You gotta switch it up, can't have game developers do the same thing over and over again and expect good things to stay good.
2042 is kinda wild. Cos it was heavily alluded to be a follow up to BF4. But it was probably as far away from the core BF4 experience, while being in the same era/world that I can imagine
Good is subjective TBH. Id wager that the majority of BF players would play a new, modern era BF game...which was regularly updated with new maps, modes, weapons and vehicles for a decade without issue. The base game just needs to be right.
The reason we dont get 10 years of support on a game is because a lot of the profit for a new game is acrued in the first 3-6 months of release. (so releasing a new game is better for profit)
Games with a fixed lifetime make more money, immortal games generally do not produce as much profit.
Which, I suspect, is why modding support isn't that common in major titles.
I will wager that the majority of the community most likely won't like whatever game comes out just because the simple fact that not even close to half the community can agree on what they want. It can be a brilliant game and that will still happen. That's the main issue with being a 20+ year old franchise. It's like you can't make a good Star Wars movie 😄
Its funny, cos whle that seems to be true...what a lot of companies also want is evergreen titles.
The only way, to me, to have an "evergreen" title requires modding support so that the community themselves can add more experiences or aspects to the game. Take Arma 3 for instance, released in 2013, still has a very decent playerbase for what it is. Then again, to counter my own argument, there's also Planetside 2 which has been up and running for ages even without mod support.
A map editor for Battlefield would do wonders tbh.
Planetside 2 does have an interesting community involved aspect though, with skins and some cosmetic items being made by the community.
Absolutely agree, I viewed Portal as a step in the right direction to having such a tool as part of the game.
Map editor for Battlefield would be insane for replayability. While there would undoubtedly be heaps of dogshit maps, there would just as undoubtedly be some absolute gems created by the community. I know Red Orchestra 2: Heroes Of Stalingrad had a community map-making contest where the winning submission(s) were included in the game itself.
C actually stands for community
The reason we dont get 10 years of support on a game is because a lot of the profit for a new game is acrued in the first 3-6 months of release. (so releasing a new game is better for profit)
Meanwhile Rust going on for over 12 years in active development (ik, different types of games too)
A BF game for once actually leveraging its back catalog of awesome maps would also do wonders. Instead of getting 1 drop of maps from old games (Portal in 2042, Second assault in BF4), id prefer them add remakes of past games maps throughout the games life.
Nah you can make it happen, just make your monetisation like a mobile game's

Look at cod mobile 
is that a DF reference

Completely baseless speculation here but I would imagine it could also serve as a good recruitment tool for new level designers, and maybe even other specializations, since they would have gained some experience with the Frostbite engine from making maps as part of the community, and then not need as extensive a "on-boarding" process for new employees.
And yes, I realize there's a lot more to the recruitment process than that, but it'd provide a "helping hand", I imagine.
That's the best part of modding* imo
Being able to have a pretty good chance of being hired from the company itself if you're good
Agreed, I know Bohemia Interactive has snatched quite a few good modders from Arma 3 into their official ranks.
Also you can basically not add any new maps yourself and rely on the community doing the hard work for you

Just like Infinite 
BI's formula:
- make game fully mod supported
- make 2 official maps
- profit
CoD servers are still 20 hz
It makes sense for WZ but even regular multiplayer is at 20 hz
Pretty much yes.
It does when the playerbase don't complain

i dont remmber last time i played on a fully vanilla arma server
Monkey paw, BF6 is going to be 2042:2, HL3 is going to be Alyx 2
I think BI also has quite a decent idea with their Creator DLC program. Where major mods or smaller development teams can develop a DLC for the game independently of the BI studio themselves and make money off of it. Obviously very reliant on the quality of the Creator DLC itself, but none the less, an interesting idea in my view.
BF6, maybe. HL3, it wont be Alyx 2
Oh, idk how the Creator DLC program works 👀
I have some insight into it since I know some of the devs from the Praire Fire and Spearhead DLC teams going back to like 2016-ish.
It's an interesting idea, just a shame that CDLC managers at Bohemia aren't that good from what I have understood.
It will be HL2: Epsiode 2.1
Since Valve is allergic to number 3
GTA fans still waiting for trailer #2!!
Soon


Thanks
Can someone help me real quick?
what u need my guy
Never mind
aight
Is that you big dog?
Constantly checking my email is getting exhausting lol
Feeling you buddy
Soon™

I don't think if you filled out the survey originally (before they altered it) that we'll likely not get another survey email just PSA.
Would be curious if anyone does, but think they probably have it noted down for those that filled out the survey before it got nuked cause EA servers were ded
i just wanna see the Ui right now and i hope its closer to BF4 tbh
I prefered BF3, but it was going with the tone of the game
For sure it needs to be FAR FAR AWAY from whatever they tried with 2042
I still don't understand how that UI got green light lol
🤣🤣🤣 Ayit, 2042 was a disaster. Like the new update when you wanna change weapons... You press X on Xbox, then have to press LB to change weapons. It's like they're going backwards with 2042 and the game have been abandoned...
so march 4th?
its what he said
nvm i don't know what he said, let me turn on subtitles
Remember boys and girls that we are playtesting, so after it's done we need to tell DICE what's
good, bad, and what to add
What's the issue with 2042's UI?
No server browser for a first 
why was i invited to playtest skating game
it was a litmus test and now youre eligible for being punished under the NDA youve been given upon reading the mail
no battlefield testing for you
I hope next BF has a camo grind similar to CoD 
BO6 even lets you earn skins based on previous titles based on your prestige, prestige system doesn't make sense for BF style game but I hope there is an incentive to grind
I would love to use skins based on WW2 era BF games or 2142
While I am unfamiliar with how Call of Duty handles the camo grind, I will say that having skins require ownership of previous titles is a bad idea in my opinion. I wish/hope that the next Battlefield game has a progression for camouflages/skins that is separate from functional elements.
You don't need ownership though, for example prestige 1 is WaW themed so you get an Model L skin that turns it into an StG44, or an MP5 skin that turns it into a Tommy Gun. Prestige 3 or 4? is BO2 themed so you get a character skin that resembles white suit of Menendez etc.
His campaign suit yeah.
Ah, I see, I must've misunderstood what you meant.
Idk maybe I am a killjoy but I don't really fancy the idea of having StG 44s or Thompsons in this game outside of Portal or some such.
I'd hope they stick to a consistent theme.
In my land of hopes and dreams, there'd be an extensive weapon component system that allows you to essentially "kitbash" a weapon system together. Say for instance you have an M4A1, you could modify the upper receiver/handguard, stock and pistol grip to turn into a L119A2.
Gets rid of the need for a bunch of separate but visually similar looking rifles, but without giving up visual variety.
I personally want a mix of BF4 and V's customization, every weapon should have 4 attachment slots(if they support it) with scopes, underbarrel, muzzle and accessory for lasers, picatinny rail, maybe light stock? etc. but also a specialization slot for unique upgrades. Like do you want higher rate of fire for your AEK or a 40 round extended mag.
I'm always a little skeptical about the concept of modifying a weapon's rate of fire or magazine capacity. It seems to me to be a recipe for making a overpowered combination of attachments and "specialization".
Yet you praise gunsmithing 
I do, but with reservations.
If it has downsides it will work fine like it did in V
You could use light bolt for higher RPM but you had to give up on 50 round mags
I suppose one could do something like that, I'm just not crazy about extended mags or rate of fire modifications. I wouldn't send an angry letter to the DICE studio in Stockholm if it ends up being implemented, but I think it'd be better if it were not.
To each their own, though.
I'm fine with 2042's attachment system with the exception of different mags, we don't really need 5 different mag types
Mag sizes should be standard or if you have the option to change mag sizes then it should be like BFV's system imo
Yeah, if there is extended mags then I hope it'd be similar to BFV where you have to trade out something else, but ideally I wouldn't see it at all.
I think 4 attachment slots, comprising optic, muzzle device, underbarrel rail, and device slots, would be ideal, with the rest being cosmetic changes.
👆
I hope there is plus system if it's not then I would love to have option to have different loadouts for same weapons, or loadouts for same classes
Like in BFV I used anti tank assault with DMRs but when I used infantry assault then I was using ARs
I don't want the plus system personally, but I do want a user-defined presets system.
So you can still quickly switch weapon configurations, just not on the fly.
That's something that always had me confused about Battlelog for BF4. You could make preset loadouts in Battlelog, but there was no way to switch between them in the actual game.
I would love for a comeback of the commander mode, obv with some tweaks and new features.
Hello someone receive a mail from EA ?
yes, an ad for the sims 4
No
you dislike gunsmithing but want attachments of modifications that change rof or capacity?
if weapon mods (basically your run-of-the-mill attachments) are grounded in reality, i can support it
Difference is that with gunsmithing you can have both, and make it a laserbeam up to 120 meters
Warzone meta is 60 round mags on ARs and no recoil attachment setups
sounds to me like your problem is execution, not the concept
I dislike gunsmithing but it's not a gamebreaker for me I just prefer less attachments to make guns feel unique, if every gun has the same 60 round mags and same no recoil setup then all of them feels the same
you keep repeating this argument like its your boogeyman. please understand that any AR with >30 mag capacity is diving into mag-fed lmg territory and wont exist in bf
battlefield explicitly never has had or will ever have a system of any kind* thatll allow weapons to be made to feel the same
Rounds in a mag isn't an indication of a weapon's class, RPK has less ammo than AK5C for example, K30 has more than either of them
rpk has less ammo than ak5c?