#battlefield-labs-discussion
1 messages · Page 35 of 1
I don’t particularly blame them, but it isn’t just about them making money. It’s about them actively making the game worse to get more potential profit
In their minds they are not trying to make a worse game. So no, they are not actively making a worse game
What company trying to make money would actively try to make a worse game. Those two statements do not allign
It will never happen
A profitable game is not necessarily parallel with the vision of an objectively good game though
The creative leadership and directors in charge of 2042 were just wrong. But they are long gone from the franchise now. (For over 4 years)
Best thing they can do is to make skins fitting for the setting
As they did with 2042 TBH. the skins they actually released were pretty great with keeping with the tone of the game, seasons, ETC
Now did I buy many of them? No, not really, but im sure lots did. (I think I bought 3/4 skins in all my play time)
The skins and they collabs they did were far away from grounded
At least it wasn't like CoD
When I see shit like MNT, I just want to rinse my eyes with bleach
It was BO4-MW19 level, but nowhere near what CoD has since MWII
When I see stupid shit like this in CoD, I just say "fuck it" to myself and don't care about winning anymore, my sole mission is to find and kill the idiot who bought it as much as possible during the match
Toxic? Maybe...
Deserved? Yes
Having no freemium currency to buy some of the lesser stuff is a genuine sting.
That's true
At least with BPacks (and I didn't like them and still don't), we could get them by playing
You know what cringes me more
not only the skins on soldiers
but also the skins on guns
i dont have a problem with skins such as camoflage but colors like pink gold red is what gets me
also skins in vehicles
Well, CoD has a problem currently with weapon skins that had a specific death effect and some of those effects are creating issues
i dont have a problem with darker colors but the lighter is what ruins the tone and the immersion of the game
Lighter vehicle skin is just an easier Target for me 😈

I remember when the pacific theatre released i went for the bikini atol skin for the corsair 1a.
It was bright red and every fucking zero a6m2 went for ME.
Agreed, ruination universal skin looks pretty cool but I don't want to spend money on it lol
Hope we get a wheelchair class

Hell yea,
Good luck out maneuvering
The only thing that makes me avoid Call of Duty is all the hackers and cheaters that continue to plague it.
Only thing makes me avoid CoD is SBMM
Only enjoyable parts of nuCoDs are betas because there is no SBMM in beta 
Only thing that makes me avoid COD right now is everything
From the goofy cosmetics to the super sweat-fested lobbies to cheaters and insanely fast ttk and horrible launcher support and huge download file and not the best performance (compared to games like THE FINALS)
It feels like the modern day COD is just a parody of its formal self
Only thing that makes me avoid CoD is the cosmetics, and the RAA, and the EOMM, and Activision, and the cheating, and...
They are trying to be Fortnite.
And to be honest, no one really does it like Fortnite.
Yeah the EOMM and SBMM makes matches feel manipulated, rigged. I am hoping that BF2025's matchmaking is based on connection speed or whatever other filters you specify, with a server browser and persistent lobbies. I am also hoping that if they whatever reason use 2042's dumb "disband-the-whole-server" system, that the playercount in each match makes aggressive SBMM infeasible.
SBMM is infeasible in BF simply because you need a variety of good and bad players in a match
Good players can farm enemy team while bad players can play a support role with taking out vehicles, spot them with recon or revive other players etc.
I feel you, I have no idea why they dropped persistent servers in BF2042 it's made the already miserable matchmaking even worse.
Money
Grind has persistent servers now, issue is it doesn't seem to have a team balancer
Losing team will continue to lose because of that
BF4 caught a lot of flak for the battlepacks but that stuff was tame compared to what's the norm now in multiplayer FPS games
SBMM is pointless for the sole reason that individual skill rarely influences the outcome of a match
Yeah, a good squad can influence a match but players can't
Even the world's sweatiest attack heli player on Shanghai can be made useless by a SOFLAM and two guys with Iglas
The only reason cracked 140 rank players have any influence on the flow of a match is because the other team lets it happen
So long as you have a cursory understanding of how different gadgets work and when to use them, even a team of mediocre players working together can win easily
That's easy to say, a lot of good heli/gunner tag teams aren't so simple to take down
On the one server I frequented more often than not the only danger to the attack helicopter was the enemy attack helicopter
True but a two man AA team can also effectively counter them
The cover that a heli can hide behind to avoid fire can also be used by engineers to periodically hide while locking on to the heli
not just that but also the fact that every player in a server has a different purpose on playing the game
not everyone is PTFO'ing hard and trying to win the entire game, some are just trying to learn a new vehicle or finish a challenge/quest/battlepass challenge
some just wanna get a long sniper headshot by camping on one spot the entire game
an objective "skill" doesn't exist, and counting ptfoing and kills as "skill" wouldn't be meaningful
DF's SBMM doesn't work because of that too
It looks into SPM
Someone with 90 revives and someone with 50 kills per match isn't going to be in the same skill level yet they are sent into the same matchmaking pool
We need more infantry only maps in next BF, I hope Vince delivers us that 
We need at least 2 new meat grinders + metro and ziba tower from portal
More infantry centric maps would be cool ngl. I wouldn't mind if DICE walked out their office doors and went into the Stockholm subway to get some inspiration, especially considering that entire system is built to be a bomb shelter in case of war.
I realise Operation Metro is a bit of a fan favorite, but I wouldn't mind a Operation Metro II to carry on.
They should name it Operation Subsurface 
Subsurface operations for some reason have become increasingly common in Army curriculums recently.
I know the UK Royal Marines have been practicing subterranean operations in Gibraltar, and the US Army have been doing the same in Fort Benning.
Well I meant it as a synonym of underground lol which is the name of the metro remake in BFV
Fair enough.
Yo
Hello
Nieźle
Oh, actually, in the category of subway/underground/metro remakes. Stockholm Central Station could be pretty cool to fight in as an infantry only map.
Or just something based on Muskö Naval Base.
There's undoubtedly going to be 1-2 in initial release.
I hate 'em but I'm unfortunately the minority
If they at least made them like redacted and not Locker/Metro, I'd live
Operation Clearout
Its just a Mall with its underground garage
there you go
Alternative names; Whole Sale, Black Friday, Crash Price
Not too meatgrindy. People couldn't spam explosives
Speaking of explosives spam; XM25 can go to hell.
So do we have some more information about the labs stuff? No new emails or anything?
Not gonna lie a small mall map would be cool to have
Like Operation Metro
no. And theoretically nobody should unless you are in it
i mean, i agree. Submarines should return to Battlefield
An infantry only map inside an aircraft carrier could be fun.
Sounds like actual hell with how tight corridors are in those
A valid point, for sure.
submarine map would be locker and metro combined cranked up to 11
2 players per square metre
So basically like the New cod Map, which is just a bullet train? A straight line lmao
I’ve been thinking of a map where halfway into the game the surface gets nuked and the server has to retreat into a big bunker underground to continue the fight (and to survive the fallout), transitioning from combined arms to something more focused on infantry since the surface kills the irradiated players overtime
That would be cool
They listened to community and made the hallway meme a reality lol
Metro remake, but with flanking channels like we have on redacted that are functional, moving train cars.
Mix of metro/locker and a big map on top for the first part of the game
This
I don't want more metro
Either make a new map with the same concept
or make a completely new small map with a different concept
Seine crossing / Metro mash up.
I want ziba tower too honestly but ziba tower is too small for BF gameplay. Realistically it would be TDM/Conquest only(unless they bring back gun game).
Close quarters dlc worked cos it was 4 maps. If we got just one of those maps as a full seasons content, it wouldn't go over well with the playerbase imo.
If portal is coming back will they support it this time?
Like instead of making let's say 2-3 maps per season they might add 1 portal map, 1 base game map
Or 1 map per portal game + 1 new map
Museum 
Vehicle spawn times and team spawning "into or not able to spawn into" mechanics need a total redesign IMO.
Capture points need to be farther from each other. No capture point should be able to cover a different capture point. PTFO one capture point at a time
Spawning then being shot in the back by an enemy that was 10 ft away has to stop
For Portal to survive, they need to put some Limits to what the servers can be. Like if you look at portal right now, it's either xp farms or 1000% damage disgusting BS
But I agree that they need to add maps, Weapons, etc. This Time around
I think the Idea behind it was the best thing coming out of BF2042.
i disagree tbh
But the implementation was bad
They advertised portal as crafting your own experience
people will play what they want to play. Creating a sandbox, seeing that people only play on one type of server, and then banning that type of server just means you're going to have 0 players
limiting that would take away the whole point of it
So basically we scrap away all the progression system altogether?
Because why would I Play normally to rank up and unlock New stuff
If I can just go in portal and unlock everything in 15 minutes
Would be very fun for sure.
Progression is broken
if you want to play on a 1000% xp server and skip the grind that's your choice
i don't like that, progression is part of the game for me
I personally don't care about portal, portal means less support for base game as can be seen in 2042. But people are claiming it's coming back so let's hope it's supported this time.
You get nothing by ranking/progressing
I hope they don't do eras, or segregated gear/vehicles.
The whole game should be built on portal. Everything visible in server browser. Separate tabs for community and official modes, but the community should be able to host official modes and have them be visible and easy to join.
It probably needs a tag system, so browsing players know to expect official or custom settings.
Portal is not just eras. Portal is the entire framework for building and hosting modes. Every single ltm and new mode in 2042 was built with portal.
Unironically yes, all gadgets should be unlocked from the start, lock weapons behind levels or challenges, I don't care but gadgets should be fully unlocked.
Gadgets I can deal with that
What military goes to battle without gadgets unlocked
I respectfully disagree, there should be some effort involved and not all unlocked at once.
Pondhawk v2 needs guns
Progression, especially in a live-service game in this era of gaming, is necessary for the game's survival
If There is no meaning or anything to Grind for, it can get stale and boring pretty fast if the maps are trash
Most people who will play next BF already played a BF before, I don't think anyone wants to unlock spawn beacon or TUGS for the 10th time 
Stop suggesting fixes for things that don't need fixing. There is nothing wrong with gear and gadgets being unlocked in a progression.
buzzkill. let the discussion happen
Progression with ending dates are lame. We all can't play at specific times
Progression as it has been since dawn of time doesn't need to change
Speaking solely for myself, I would prefer to unlock them again. Maybe I'm a dopamine addict but I like the reward element of it, especially in the initial stages of the game experience.
we need a more in depth mastery skin grind than 2042s 
Buzzkil for stating my opinion. But others are allowed to make theirs? Get lost
If I was a Dev and reading this channel, I think I would have pulled my hair so Many Times just thinking about the amount of different feedback I'd get from labs ahahahahah
Most live service games has a skin grind to keep it going, not equipment grind. Marvel Rivals basically unlocks every hero from the start.
I wonder how they will filter the feedback
You get it
A nicer skin as well
skins mean nothing to me
BF2 had minimal progression 🧓
100%
the red and black was boring and uninspiring 
Rivals has the whole progression being climbing the comp ladder
I want "magnetic air vehicle" effect to stop
but a mastery skin that has a rewarding grind is always fun 
if youre solely here to state "just dont discuss x since (it was solved already)" isnt an opinion. its an ultimatum. im simply gonna lurk and see how this develops because it might be interesting.
Starting the game with a proper class system also allows better progression. Unlike 2042s.
Play as engineer > unlock engineer gear
makes sense
AA has too much range. In BF3 planes had to land to self repair, and you had to hunt down the AA all round
US players literally complain all the time about dice trying to reinvent the wheel, or change things not needing changes. Yet here we are asking for it 😅
Most people are playing casual
I remember in BF4 on the PS3 the only things I had unlocked were DMRs and snipers 😂
I never played anything else
and those people have a battlepass grind
Feels like that's been discussed a gazillion times tho 😂
Progression is a key part of the new game and new player experience. Overwhelming a new player with all gear unlocked is a terrible idea imo.
Battlepass grind is basically another skin grind
what's battlepass...
Sure is
80% of the conversations in this discord have something to do with "BF3 was peak" or "BF4 is peak"
it's a hero shooter after all
Gets quite boring imo, it's just circling to the same thing every single time
They can learn from their own best game
Of course
battlepass is content that didnt make it into the launch window. thats it
2042 is peak 
Battle passes are designed for day to day retention.
Someone here said "stop changing what's good" BF3 was best, why'd the mess it up?
Because BF3 was the best back then, not now
battlepass is a real life money grab
I don't mind those comments, but they should have some further content beyond that, i.e. "BF4 is peak, because X, but Y, maybe they could Z for the next game".
Compare to current audience, possibilities in engine and mechanically etc
Bf3 progression was pretty good. Gear wise.
Gameplay and such is pretty dated these days.
If you played BF3, and all of them too, then you'd know
I haven't seen many of those, I just leave when that conv starts tbh 😂
Bf4 progression was OK, but weapon unlocks/battle packs system was weird and a bit annoying
COMS is key to fun.
id like a bit more elaboration on this.
Fair enough, you do you, mate.
I played BC2/BF3/BF4/BFH/BF1/BFV/BF2042 so I do know
BF3 and Teamspeak servers made the game fun
I disagree because people can read item descriptions. Devs shouldn't treat players like children imo. Like we all know what spawn beacon or a defib does lmao.
@swa word!
BF3 was good, but if I was JUST introduced to it in 2025, I would see so many things that would annoy me
If a new player wants to use SRAW instead of RPG then let them.
Yet i still get minimum revive health 
Devs shouldn't treat players like children imo
FACTS 🗣️ (but I also agree with Bsod)
A very high % of players are complete n00bs who need their hands held.
Meant for @feral garden
but... the majority of players would likely be in the underage bracket?

Learning from failure is fun in games too
So many people are driven by gear and skin progression that they’d probably just quit after two weeks if they didn’t earn new stuff over time
And having a progression unlock system also helps them learn what does and doesn't need balancing at game launch.
I think the game should be designed so that people become power users fast, after tutorial/hints
BF3 gameplay stuff that are dated:
- suppression (and it affecting spread and gun sway)
- not centered crosshair (aka visual recoil)
- movement is janky and dated now
- Various glitches and bugs that would drive people mad

BPs in new games are inevitable 😭
I don’t play with that approach but aside from easing players into the potential gear options, that incremental unlock feeling is of course one of the main reasons it’s done this way
Player survival times should be made longer, to put more value on staying alive. Respawn times should take much longer, maybe you spawn at base first, so you'll play a bit more tactical.
No matter what, BF3 was peak and BC2 laid the fountain for it. After BF3 everything was completely uninteresting
It's almost like if they should draw inspiration from a more recent title that many agree has perfected the foundations of BF gameplay... 
There is no BF with perfect gameplay 
2042s battle passes and weekly missions were pretty good imo.
The token system is genuinely good.

Not entirely perfect but it is very close to
I'll give credit where it's due. Its token system was very good.
I did enjoy the crisp feeling of shooting someone and seeing my shots connect. In BF1 the recoil on most guns were too insane for me to notice as much as BFV
Now. That being said. We just need more control over our games!
And then hey good game!
Tired of WW shooters
But alas they'll listen to the loud crowd of players that only played BF3/4
Tho I will say BFV's recoil system is definitely way more "idealistic" and not super realistic
I'd also like daily missions tho, which would give some soft currency like the scrap. Which could be used to unlock set weapon/soldier/vehicle skins or looks.
Never need another WW shooter in gaming
Cries in Squad44 😎
No realism
Real bad
We need a test range like BFV/4
Suppression, or something like it would be great.
Not bad, just different 🤷
gunplay is garbage in my personal opinion 
movement is good, but could be tweaked to be a bit smoother
customization (but that's cause limitations of it being ww2 based and not modern era)
attrition
tanks with the annoying ass "glancing blow"

Is weapon balance good? I play the same gun always
I don't mind selectively unlocking stuff, but I think to be able to selectively unlock the equipment, you should be required to play the game and not instantly have access to everything. I like the idea of a "point"/whatever system where you can accumulate "points" of some kind and expend them to unlock new equipment, to include gadgets, weapons, attachments.
You just master a weapon and play it then yeah I mean
@swa right
Suppression that's purely visual, and starts with a blur on screen edge, that progresses to cover more of the screen (but never the full screen or your sight) would be interesting. Some form of auditory suppression effect could also work.
Agreed
But V and Hardline had some of the best gunplay the series can offer?
@feral garden for sure.
BFVs not centered crosshairs + the "spread = recoil" system is annoying af 🤷♂️
also, glancing blows are an awesome mechanic
I'm in full agreement with this, something to give a claustrophobic effect but without throwing you under the bus to the extent you can't return effective fire.
Tired of getting "SQUASHED"
and i never mentioned hardline, but it does have good gunplay (just make crosshair stay screen center and it would top all BFs)
warsaw revamped's updated gunplay was also top tier imho
Can give it a use without making those 1v1 or small group fights annoying
i know you didnt mention hardline. i did. because i wanted to give one more entry so you could understand my position better
Visual suppression should exist imo, it makes a game feel like BF, 2042 would've felt more like a BF game if it had visual suppression for example
bfv gunplay and hardline gunplay aren't similar at all tho 
Visual suppression is definitely the move
Another thing to add to my notes 
i never said they were similar. i said theyre the best (imo) gameplay the series offered...
executions can be different and still be good
fair
i still think BFVs gunplay is the weakest in the series, along with bf1
A vignette with a touch of chromatic aberration, maybe sound ducking for the audio effect (@feral garden). I.e. the "snaps" of the bullets become louder, everything else becomes lower in volume.
ear canals close as the walls start closing in
Would at least be interested in seeing how that plays out
ringing in the ears
Plz no, I can’t stand ringing
That and heartbeats make me feel feint at times
if that makes you feel faint tf you playing shooters for
jokes aside... really?
pray you never get tinnitus
No idea why, fine with practically everything else. I remember back at secondary when we did those pulse checks for biology I just kind of faked it at times as I hated it
In fact I’m the reason there is a toggle for Zain’s passive proc in settings
wew that sucks
Asked about it on the forums and they made it a setting
No
It all depends. Stuff like this is easy to over do. You can make it a mild effect on the audio side, but you dont want to disadvantage the suppressed player too much. Especially in a MP shooter where directional sound is so important.
At the same time it all depends on what they do with weapon balance. Maybe they will want machine gunners (LMG user class) to act as a supressive forces.
In some games it’s more bearable if it’s more of a synthesised sound but if it sounds like one it’s just… no
Yeah, I am not suggesting they completely silence other sounds, but the supersonic cracks could do with getting louder in such a situation, in my view.
You would hate Arma 3 with the ACE3 mod. Introduces both ear ringing and a heartbeat sound for elevated/lowered heartrates.
i kind of want to ruin the bf3 theme for you...
I turned off those sound effects, or found mods to do so
Usually the white flashing and desaturation is enough to gauge my physical state
Or being on the floor
Which seemed to be 30% of my playtime
I used to use the chromatic aberration effect in place of the white flashing.
Played for 3 hours last night and only got a medium bruise on my chest all night. Assaulted three objectives as the pointman for the lead section, took over control over a fireteam when my section IC was MERT'd, spent some time clearing contested buildings and compounds, nearly had an RPG shot at me. Was a lot of fun, can recommend.
But yeah visuals as a means of suppression sounds good. Best part of squad’s suppression is its visual elements. If the next bf aims to be slower with less movement options, you need ways to disrupt them to take space beyond just smokes. That might just be the way
I should try Squad again... I have some friends who play that religiously.
Has anyone done an audio comparison between the different audio they added for the circle of hell event, and default? It's an option in Portal now, but I didn't get to okay that mode much
Played it once, got bored, didn’t touch it again. So I’ve not been exposed to it enough to know how different it is
I'm hoping we get a good, decent test range.
same.
Yeah. BF4s or BFVs was pretty good.
Indeedelidoodad.
How do people feel about having the machine guns separated into light and medium again, akin to BFV?
So LMG can be ADS'd from the shoulder, whereas MMG have to be bipodded to ADS.
I'm feeling romantical
Very out of the blue, and also about 2 weeks late.
I'd post what I was referencing, no embed perms though
Tomorrow the wait shall continue...
I might just wingsuit into DICE's HQ and steal a hard drive with the game
Hopium vs Copium
I'd be fine with it as a concept. It would allow them to make a different type of machine gun, that's more powerful, or with much higher rpm/belt size...but without making it extremely OP.
Similar balancing concept to the AT rocket gun from BF1. Very powerful, but also requires more skill and map awareness to use effectively.
They could also be added as battle pickups if they wanted to make them really OP
Portable DShK please!
Interesting you mention belt size, I hadn't thought of that, but I think that having MMGs have a larger belt compared to LMGs would be a reasonable trade if they have to be bipodded to ADS.
@striker tinnitus is a biii.
My guy didn't even choose the modernized DShKM 🙂
Games were better on 5 CDs + 6 hour install.
I mentioned belt, as battle pickups could work as a limited ammo, single use item.
Aka, you'd pick it up and can't use your other gear while carrying it. If you swap gear, it drops the pickup.
So like BF1s elites or whatever
Aha, alright.
I think MMGs should have explosive rounds and one shot tanks tbh
Especially the armored MG or flamethrower guys.
BF3 had hidden weapons right? Kinda like elites
That's bf4. It's where battle pickups started.
I like that idea, finding something before you have it unlocked, but you have to cap/hold the point
yeah, bf3 you didn't have to sprint to get the usas-12 frag rounds, you can spawn with it 
Bf3 space program weapon
The Battlefield Community requires rocket jumping in the next game.
We had that in a Battlefield game already. Wasn't a big success
Let’s do it again but do it right this time
I was (1) unaware of that, and (2) making a joke.
that's just a little bird 
The Pondhawk is already overpowered
@mossy marten yes but more 😛
Well, it was 22 years ago in an expansion so easy to forget 
Tear gas pondhawk
A vehicle that's a mobile player launcher. Like those pods on the end game maps.
napalm pondhawk
Or the ones in BF4 Final Stand or whatever it was called.
Oh yeah, it was final stand
Ah, so we're thinking of the same thing.
Does anyone jump in a chat room and play daily EST?
I never played BF3 multiplayer for long so I thought there might have been some in BF3 End Game or something.
I just re purchased them all on Steam, BF1 to V. $15
anyone got an invite yet?
@swift grove if they did, they wouldn't be allowed to tell you
My electricity company invited me to pay my bill. That's some kind of invite.
Politely refuse
That will make my graphics card "no workie"
😂😂😂👍🏼
Nah, I ain't getting married for a while, so the invites should be out in a few years
is this a trick question to see who can't keep anything to themselves? 🧐 heard enough?
I got an invite to a phone interview tomorrow if that helps
Its still kicking and decently cheap if ubwanna play now
Nah, not really. Thanks though.
No one will have confirmation for weeks or months yet and different zones are not confirmed.
Until any news is posted on official DICE Social Media platforms or #battlefield-labs-news nothing is official.
What you all signed up for was to be in a pool to maybe help test the game. Do not expect to be entered.
If you are selected you are already under an NDA (Pre Release Feedback Agreement) and thus be unable to speak about being accepted or what you are testing.
🤐
Technically, aren't we all unable to speak about it, considering we haven't played it?
You're not a philosopher
Counterpoint: pedal powered PC
or easier way
run an extension cord from neighbors 
Wait? We aren't playing right now?

I made AI do the math. Conclusion. I'm not in that good a shape
Hire a few people to do it for you
I am always playing 2042. Mornings and Evenings EST
Well, I guess you now have a solid goal with your physical exercise.
No
for me its bugged
all playtesting emails are under nda
i have registered so many times and im not receiving any confirmation
you don't get a confirmation for registering, only for creating an accout
i mean confirmation for registering for the labs
not an actual invite to the labs
okay i delete my messeges sorry
So im supposed to be lucky too then
yep
cause in my other 2 accounts i received it
they'll have been different emails then so yeah one of your accounts might've not got it yet, or ever
also i'm pretty sure you're not supposed to sign up with multiple accounts so i wouldn't admit that in here
Yeah i only did it because i thought the site was bugged for me
it was when the queues were happening and the site was too laggy
Valid concern
It was funny to see statements like "Why are the queue and sign up so laggy".
Then the same person being like: "I signed up on 8 different emails"
😄
Dear Tärning,
pls start test
hugs and kisses,
Hobbyist
Anyways, what are the views on separating battle rifles from assault rifles as happened in Hardline?
It kinda made sense and kinda didn't
I think it comes down to the fact that the battle rifle fires a full-power cartridge compared to the assault rifle that fires intermediate-power cartridges, so I guess it makes sense for it to have its own category
Maybe tomorrow we’ll get some news
It also seems that battle rifles are more intended for Semi automatic purposes then full auto
I would assume the Police theme also played into the decision, since support no longer had access to machine guns.
Fair
I'm very on the fence with whether it should be separate or a combined category.
Just asked my Dad and he is saying that the Battle Rifle is meant for higher power, long distance engagements
So it makes sense that it gets its own category
Cause Assualt rifles are meant for short to medium range engagements
That full auto ain't gonna do you any good when firing from large distances lol
Yeah, battle rifles tend to be used more for longer distance engagements, usually to bridge that gap between intermediate cartridge assault rifles and designated marksman rifles or sniper rifles.
Tbf since its kinda its own thing it should probably have its own category
Kinda like the marksman rifles
Yeah, my main reservation is whether it would introduce too many categories and who gets access to them.
Yep, usually Tuesday is news day
Tewsday
Ah, never enough categories
In the words of KC, "Take your time, hurry up"
Chewsday*
innit m8
Yep
insert Hoxton from Payday
If nothing is announced tomorrow... I'll freeze myself and hopefully melt when a trailer releases
I'll ensure you stay frozen until 5 months after release 👍
Ill pull you out of the freezer in two years just like the hamburger patties I got sitting in my freezer
You never know when you want a burger, got to be prepared for the future
I prefer mine freezer burned and 10 years old
Makes me feel less poor
The freezer burn on the burger ages like wine
kjempeflott
Fantastic indeed
You do you king
You dropped this 👑
Nei, jeg er Svensk.
I can barely understand Norwegian, yet it runs through my blood
Plan to visit some family up there eventually
Ah so not Norwegian?
Swedish huh
Correct.
Imaaaagine
wagons
My grandma loves talking about how she drove to Swedan for cheaper groceries
But I'm in America now so I don't really get it
There was some dude a few years ago that got arrested for smuggling butter into Norway from Sweden.
That made for an interesting news story.
Time for specialized training then lol
Surely she drove there for the patties
Is butter illegal?
Norwegian Krone (currency) is generally worth more than Swedish Krona (currency) so it's very common for people in the border regions to travel into Sweden for shopping.
That I do agree with
Ah fair
Swedens the cheaper Norway basically
It is not, I think the reason the guy was smuggling it across was that there was (somehow) a butter shortage in Norway at the time (if I recall correctly, which I might not).
Eh sounds like just using your better currency in a land with a less valuable currency
Like if I bring a USD dollar to south america
It be worth a shit ton
I actually hold a lot of admiration for Norway, even though I have zero ties to that magical land. I have some ancestral ties to Finland and my goodness gracious do I have admiration for Finnish sisu.
I said it to take a jab at the Sweeeede
I'm more impressed that Norway didn't get oiled corrupt
Watched a few videos on it
Most countries that struck oil usually ends up like South America eventually
Where the Oil companies own the gov
Norway could probably buy the rest of Scandinavia with that oil money.
How the turn tables
Indeed.
Meh
And whats yalls favorite thing about it
Haven't played it in far too long.
I mean fair
Ain't gonna remember everything but
For me at least its got to be the ammo limitations for vehicles
Yeah that was nice.
Anyways, since it is now half past 10 PM in my current country of residence; I shall bid you all farewell and wish you a happy halloween.
The snob has spoken
I bid you a good farewell
Bro is 4 months late
Just remake battlefield 4



I hate the idea, LMGs and MMGs were useless in V
not in breakthrough
They are just more situationally useful than other weapons. thats why I think they'd work better as battlepickups, but be very powerful.
They still were imo. LMGs are clunky ARs with mag sizes somewhat even lower than ARs. MMGs are 200 round beltfed bullet dispensers except when you fire every sniper will have a free kill.
That's why everyone played with Lewis in BFV, it was the only LMG with LMG mag sizes 
Lmgs very well were not useless.
They were more accurate assault rifles and extremely well balanced.
20 rounds per mag ain't it
People used support to play with shotguns in V because of that 
Fg42 wasn't an lmg and was akin to an ar.
Bar reloaded so quickly and killed well.
Brens 30 rounder was small but its reload speeds were really quick.
looks at my bfv stats
My machine guns stats would like to have a word with you.
When people wants to use LMGs they want to go Rambo with big mags. BFV's system is flawed because you can't have good mag size and mobility at the same time. MMG users are free kills for snipers in BFV.
LMGs in BFV are more accurate ARs with slower TTK. I would rather use any AR over any LMG(except maybe FG42). At least most ARs has mag size above 20 rounds lmao.
Didn't stop me from running around and flanking objectives by spraying and praying with my MG42 in BFV lol
Effective? Not really. Fun? Definitely.
As far as LMG vs. MMG in a modern setting, it could work if the MMGs were guns that are usually mounted, hence the heavier weight and requirement to go prone. Like the Browning .50 cal or DShK.
But I would personally prefer to have one LMG class that has all of the handheld belt-fed guns, while MMGs and HMGs stay mounted and vehicle weapons.
Playing V and 2042 back to back made me realize how good LMGs can be when they can have 200 round mags instead of 20 🤣 Just because they have 200 round mags they aren't OP either. They are still clunky ARs. But they are far more viable.
The main reason the BAR, Bren, Type 11, etc have such low ammo counts is because at the time, those were considered LMGs for a infantry soldier. That being said, not much in BFV is aiming for historical authenticity.
I liked using the Type 11 because of its quirky hopper magazine. I hope we get some weird weapons that aren't in most FPS games in BF6
Hard to do that in modern era, everything is an AR15 clone
I mostly want the NeoStead 2000 back, it was one of my favorite guns in BC1/2
MMG's were bad in bf5.
For the most part LMG's were more accurate assault rifles and they kept with that theme really well.
The Bren was absolutely amazing.
MMGs weren't bad, it was the constant need to be prone + the horrible visibility that made MMGs "bad", and promoted a campy playstyle.
Yeah, any weapon that relies on zero mobility means you just get domed by a skilled player.
did they already pick the candidates?
i received an e-mail but tried to respond to the guidelines 24 hours later and it failed to work
We will learn 10 seconds after they send the first mails. Someone will leak it.
MG42 was pretty much used for either anti plane by people who couldn't land the panzerfaust, or the spotting of suppressed targets via the support role.
when the player test begin?
In one millenium
in the next few weeks. If you want to have a better chance ... ok no, I can't tell you that.
when its ready
In the next few weeks its going to be next few weeks again
They could as well have said in the coming months
uhhh you'll know more in the next two weeks. 😉
dont tease me
We had leaks from a whole year ago's playtesting and that was a closed playtest with 2042 running on the front. Whenever they start doing playtests we will see people streaming it day 1.
👀
As well as when they send invites, bet we'll see people posting screenshots on Reddit containing both their emails and "strictly confidential"
Eren, you can see into the future
My titan abilities are yet to be discovered by you.
this smells of ai
well people already showed screens of the registration complete mail which is also under nda
Yeah, I wonder if some got banned already lol
I didn't even get that, I ain't invited 😭

just wait
Your playtesting screen should be empty
If it is you are likely in
i doubt it unless their reddit name is 1:1 the same as their EA Account
If not fill it again
did the sign up on my 2 accs and got the mail on both
Well looks like they are playtesting skate too, Imma signup for it, I have no experience with skating games though
I love to say that they will soon start to beg to playtest skate
I showed zero interest and got dozens of emails over 2024
I just don't have a controller to participate in it :/
big shame
hitting things with extreme velocity in 3 was so fun
There is an option to participate in it with KBM, they ask you what you prefer as an input device
just for all the ones I've been emailed about or looked up they specified the use of controller
must have only added kbm within the last few months in that case
nope
been a while like this
I’m really liking BF4’s campaign as of now.
well all of the invites i've had have specified it so idk what to say
Yeah they've been playtesting skate for years, I don't even remember how long ago i signed up for that
I suck at multiplayer man💀
Same
at some point youre gonna switch from a faster gameplay loop to a more thoughtful one
twitch shooters and zoomies are countered by positional gameplay
thats at least how it was for me
They really aren't
id love you to tell me why its working for me then
Doing it a few times doesn't mean it's an actual counter
You can have the best positioning in the west and you'll still be at the mercy of someone with good aim and control of his weapon system.
It depends on the game, and then that games design/maps. So many games these days have maps made for good/fast and often movement to be advantageous, over map knowledge and position.
2042s for example, there is not a lot of cover that actually covers multiple angles. Outside of windows in houses, ETC.
"at the mercy of" might be too exaggerated, but you'll have a disadvantage, unless you too have good aim and control of your weapon.
Take the nest area on Exposure for example. there is only 1 position (the table) in that command room that has cover from 3 angles, and its destructable.
But knowledge, positioning, ETC is only part of the puzzle of success
positional gameplay doesnt explicitly mean camping.
basically that
for as long as ive played fps games i see more and more people play aggressively.
On haven for example, when trying to cap the D flag. the best position by far for capping that flag safely is the big metal bins by the wall on the C side of the flag.
there are multiple areas like this that will give you the advantage over a player with superior movement/aim
using knowlege of maps and routes you gain an advantage over others players and put them in a position where they can hardly retaliate, even if theyre shot up with caffeine and other energizing substances
That I agree with, and it's pretty obvious to my mind that stationary gameplay doesn't usually work all that well in the long run. But even if you apply extremely good positioning, you will still need to land hits to actually defeat the opponent, something that requires a certain amount of skill in aim and control which, at least to my mind, are what twitch shooters are defined by.
The reason I dislike 128P in 2042 is that there are very few ways you can use map knowledge and superior position to gain an advantage against so many players.
hence why the gameplay feels fast and lackluster without much thought behind plays
its very easy to tell a game thats made for mindless run and gun
Can't think of any spots where in a 1v1 you can "hardly retaliate"
In a 64p version, you are up against players amounts you can sometimes handle. Say youre defending a flag against 3-5 players, but 128 essentially always doubles that abount to 6-10. which im not good enough to fight against, and the maps aren't layed out well enough to let me maneuver around that many players.
most of the time numbers is what's the determining factor of when and how you can fight back
@versed token by literally not being in front of them
by being behind cover. waiting to shoot at the right moment. basic ambush tactics
Well BF games being a case of capture and control, and not just PVP/TDM...it all depends on the context of a 1v1.
Are you trying to cap a flag the enemy owns, is the enemy trying to cap a flag you own, is it a neutral contested flag.
Player action/re-action all depends on factorsdictated by the circumstance.
If my team owns a flag, and its a 1v1 or 1v2 against me. I can afford to engage, and try to kill, maybe die to see who/what player is shooting and from where. I can quickly respawn and reengage in this circumstance
I do wish BF would get rid of the player numbers on the capture points tho. For me it makes the game feel dumber.
At least the player numbers on sectors seen from range
I get why they added it, I just feel it gives us too much info
Might aswell remove the bar that shows enemy presence too
Regarding 1v1s in 2042...I cant tell you how much it angers me when im in a 1v1 and I get scanned by paik. 🤣
As much as I hate applying real life concepts to video games, the principle of relative superiority applies even in video games (in my experience). Most engagements (again, in my experience), boil down to finding the vulnerability/-ies of your opponent and exploiting that fully. Whether that be a diversionary firefight (often unintended) and taking advantage of that to flank and defeat the opponent, or identifying the enemy weapon system and knowing their limitations to either close or extend the distance to a range that you are more comfortable with. In the case that both your own weapon system(s) and those of the opponent are similar or even identical (in the case of BF), it generally comes down to experience and the environmental considerations, who can leverage their surroundings to their benefit fastest and most efficiently.
To illustrate this point, I'll use one of my favorite techniques in BF4:
- Throw smoke,
- Throw decoy device into smoke,
- Run in a flanking direction,
- Wait for enemy to close into the smoke or expend their ammunition,
- Take advantage of either:
- Their distraction by the decoy device when closed into the smoke.
- Their gap in fire when reloading.
- Profit.
You might think this is a technique that I just made up, but trust me, most opponents I have encountered fall for this ridiculously often.
Identify weakness, create favorable conditions, exploit weakness and conditions.
Does happen, and is annoying, but not a universal truth that it occurs or is paid attention to.
I will concede that that shit happens way too often on Op Locker.
Speaking of which, 3D spotting, very annoying especially when it's shared across your entire team.
Im mostly fine with 3D spots. Just make the 3D spotted duration a bit less, and make minimap spotting be last known/spotted location instead of a live tracker.
I wish the 3D spot would only show for your squad and the minimap spot as you described only last known/spotted location.
Realistically im fine with spotting as it is tho. even if they didnt change anything. Jusy fix the bugs with it. Like spot visibility through walls/geometry, ETC
That was a good feature in 2042, I have to say.
Being able to death ping should get fixed though
YES. Please remove that shit entirely.
So, when I signed up for BF Labs, my video card was not at their suggested minimum. I have since upgraded my card... Is there a way (or do I even need to) re-send my info to that survey that was taken on the initial launch of BF Labs?
I wish the ping worked most of the time for me tho 😭
Lot of times i can't see my squad mates ping 😂
Hard to tell if it's even bugged sometimes
Sure would be nice to get some testing dates
They ain't gonna say anything 
And whoever gets an invite is not allowed to say anything either.
so the closest thing you will see to getting testing dates is if someone decides to drop leaks somewhere
Hate waiting.
Not even necessarily testing dates, just a confirmation that invites have been sent out
No harm in doing that
I hate when people say that shit in game bro like how do you expect them to learn?
for real dude.
And then some of them will say "test range" like olay great. They can do basic movement. now how do they fight?
I posted thoughtful gameplay to videos and screenshots 
They must be COOOKING tho, still no news about the playtests.
Just hoping to god it's good man
Can't wait to uninstall 2042
I'm not, playing as Blasco and seeing 300 ''spot denied'' per device is an eye opening experience. Most of the time you are dying to people because you are 3D spotted in BF games. If there was an indication when you were spotted like Rao's hack alert then screen would be beeping yellow every 2 seconds.
they might do that since so many babys cried about not getting a confirmation mail
BFV did fine without 3D spotting, or at least limited 3D spotting, only some classes could spot them(recon whenever they shoot someone or support when they suprress someone), I think binoculars also 3D spots but not sure
Pre-nerf Paik needs to return
Most of the spotting should be 2D imo
Like on a minimap rather than a dorito on the player's head
It's the least they could do, really
Leaks are gonna happen anyway and giving people clarity is better than keeping them in the dark
There's no way they don't anticipate leaks if they're doing massive playtests
Of course they do
They've already been doing the smaller scale controlled playtests for a good bit at this point
BRO SUGGESTED I GO TO THE TEST RANGE
Not to mention how many through smoke wallhacks exist in BF2042
What's with every modern FPS giving players a fucking wallhack ability
Can't combat cheaters might as well give legit wallhack to players 😛
3d spotting seems even more busted in BF1
I was flying in a plane, just spamming Q over an objective, and it highlighted players with no issue
3D spotting makes sense, but should be more restrictive, i.e. only highlighting for your own squad.
Time for you be frozen down, my friend.
I wish I forgot they even announced labs
What you could try and do to remediate that is to slam your head against a wall hard enough to knock yourself out and cause a case of amnesia.
The latter has a relatively low chance of success, compared to the former.
I'll take my chances
🫡
NEXT WEEK. NEWS. TRUST.
Are you stating the obvious or have you seen something through your titan abilities?
I believe nothing.
API man?
You shouldn't say that here...
EA preparing for labs is a given though
I was inclined to believe you when you said we'll get news in 2 weeks
Armour Piercing Incendiary man?
Im desperate xd
lol
Same that's why I'm looking for pointless stuff
fuuuck why announce something just to make us wait
ikr
So you knew to sign up, obviously.
"Why make us wait"
studio doesn't announce something relatively ahead of time
"Omg i never even heard of this coming out"
Well, obviously some time's needed...
Im in the wrong here I know
Just cant wait to see more
Its only been 22 days. People are just impatient. Best to put it out of your mind, as you may not even be chosen to test.
You're totally right lol
22 days too long 

22 days already passed and every single second we're closer to dying
testing is a matter of life and death. it's the breath of life
please
RELEASE ME FROM THIS TORMENT
Can't quite tell if you're being sarcastic to me but
Yes, release me from the t o r m e n t
i specialize in vagueness
up to interpretation
I prefer clarity
Schrodingers fanboy
I wonder why not just announce labs when they are actually ready?
Instead of making people wait Weeks, they could have Said "hey guys, BFLabs registration is on and the playtests will start in 7 days, stay frosty"
true, they did announce it quite early 
As much as hype can raise quickly, it can die super quickly
Because EA earning calls was the day after, also if you new to this, DICE has always been like that, make an announcement and then go radio silence for months.
Not New to this, don't worry.
The fact that it's always like that with DICE doesn't make it better
Lack of (transparent) communication is what kills so many games on the long run
Along with bugs, cheaters, lack of balance, etc.
*Adding this before someone comes with an "ACKCHUALLY"
this is what i meant
any chiv 2 players in here
Hows all doing ^^
Drinking coffee on a day off, so can't get much better tbh.

feeling some hard melancholy right now

but then again, we don't know when invites are being sent out 
or when tests are whatsoever
Then why is there a test under "playtest in progress" 
And no email

are you referring to the labs interest signup? the one that caused the queue system to go haywire with millions trying to sign up for
Is this a US only playtest? I've been trying to sign up but cannot fill out the form. Is it because my number is not American?
EU & NA
I see, thanks.
It will expand to more regions overtime iirc
Thats nice to know
from FAQ
https://www.ea.com/en-gb/games/battlefield/faq Here is full FAQ 🙂
I can't read
It's OK, neither can Dozer mains.
Oof
??
how do i withdraw myself from the tests, i registered but i dont wanna participate, all id do is to compare it to battlefield 2 who is my favorite and idk if people want that
just give your account to me if you get in, I totally promise to play clean and not break any rules

lol
i got to play something great

insert "that's bait" gif
man i want to talk about stuff
me too buddy. but no talky-talky until open testing
Has it begun then
nah, doubt it tbh
Nope
Testing has already begun, as long as you're a developer at DICE.
yeah didnt they say the game had been playtested for over a year already at an investments call
so i guess thats true
yeah it's been known they've been doing lots of internal playtests for a while as well
of course you won't find anyone who has done it, cough cough, because it's under nda
So when does the play test start
20 minutes.
16min
you guys receives stuff?
i only received an email with a survey
bait?
I keep getting asked to fill out the survey even though I've filled it out like 20 times
I will neither confirm or outright deny that possibility.
same,i also have a bug where in my other alt account the survey doesn't appear and has invisible numbers
I just want to snipe in peace.
I just want to knife snipers in peace.
They are usually so magnificently oblivious to their surroundings.
ahhh, i get it haha
anyway I remember there was a non discolure agreement so makes sense lol
I hope they are cooking this time
Yeah, if you are accepted into the playtest, you'll have to sign a non-disclosure agreement, and technically if you have signed up you have already signed an NDA that is separate.
Yes.
Yes.
Yes
Good old NDAs
wow so agressive man, let me throw some C4 at you
I haven't had much to eat today so I would appreciate that.
No email. I am holding you personally responsible.
Sounds good. I also made some nachos since I was hungry too. If you care for some I'll share mate. Olives?
Nah, not a fan of nachos, thanks though!
Bruh
i like lying too
why would you ever say you got invited with your steam linked to your account 😭😭😭
js asking to get banned
Bro is lying for attention, let him do
ik
Yeye whatever... have fun in the playtest 🤣
well assuming your name is Ј_ͲƦ𝙸PPЕƦ on battlefield, you are STILL getting banned so have fun in your "playtest"
So you signed an NDA for...nothing ?? At least try to lie good
you can't share ANYTHING about it
the intelligence of some people here is astounding
you literally shared what was inside the email like what
"just got an email inviting me to complete registration for the labs playtest included a link for a NDA electronic signature page."
"just got an email inviting me to complete registration for the labs playtest included a link for a NDA electronic signature page"
Bro your not even entertaining
they're not gonna ban you on discord
hmm if there is NO NDA that you signed, please show some proof then
They won't ban you for an NDA that you invented, what ar you on bro
show me the contents of the email if you never signed nda
can i see the email please
show us

Man if you really 54 you must be bored in life fr
"i'm not getting banned i only slightly broke nda"
No one has received any nda email yet or maybe the emails take time to be send worldwide
He broked nothing bro, he invented that mail so he could get a little bit of attention like a 16yo girl on Instagram, that's actually pathetic.
he just ignores me when i say show me the email
js embarrassed that he lied for no reason
exactly
so he is not any special than us
j tripper talk little girl
but i got it today
it takes days and most of these emails are delayed we just have to be patient
Any news about the beta ?
starts in 38min
It was yesterday
this guy looks like he’s apart of some scammy lookin servers anyway lol
don’t trust one guy out of the few tens of thousands who signed up
at least until tom henderson has anything to say
more fighting please
cant play bf if hes 54?
I want Irish's sentinel/trophy system for next BF
Grenade spam can get so annoying so quickly
They should make it an engineer gadget
I hope there's gonna be Levolution + dynamic maps with cool events
Ex: Map surface gets nuked halfway and people need to go fight underground, shifting into a more infantry type environment (like metro)



🟰 


🟰 🐐


Have any emails gone out yet?
they trying to to tell us smt

Hope they improve visibility in new battlefield game, you cant see shit in bf5
If they add skyscrapers like in hourglass/shanghai , make them completely destructable
THE FINALS RAAA
I played 2042's BF3 mode and visibility became an issue in it too
Lights they added to players is a huge plus in terms of visibility imo and I'm too used to it
Not sure how they will handle that in next game
BATTLEFIELD 3 ♥️
can someone give me the site or link or I can write to them and leave my opinion on the next Battlefield!? They say they read our comments so where can I write to them?!
- There is no such site or form (yet).
- How can you have an opinion on the next Battlefield when you haven't played it?
Opinion: just re-release bf3
BF3, BF4 or BC1+2 remakes will be their ''break the glass in case of emergency'' plans I assume. If next game flops we will see their remakes imo.
What next BF needs is proximity voip, think about all the funny stuff people will make with it, 2042 chat is empty and I noticed how empty it is when I went back to BF4 and BF1, people were talking mid match lol
Id love prox voip too but I doubt they'll do that
They couldn't even handle all-chat in 2042's launch because of "toxicity"
or even better. battlefield 2!
Most game with proximity voip has an option to mute people even without going to the menus, they should implement something similar, if someone is being a troll you should have the option to mute them, as well as the option to close proximity voip altogether
2042 leadership is gone too, there is a chance new DICE might be more okay with a little bit of ''toxicity'' imo
toxic behaviour should never be accepted. stuff like hateful speech should always be banned
Man games with voip are fuckin amazin, just look at arma 3, arma reforger, squad etc, voip adds soooo much depth to the expreience, but we are talkin about EA here soo my guess is any form of "toxic behaviour" will be met with ban in liike 2 nano seconds and dont get me wrong im not talkin about things that should be punished like runnin around and just droppin hard r's, im talkin about callin your enemies names
EA would ban half their playerbase if voip was on
true that
"capture the fn point!!" = banned
ive seen games like gunz the duel who let everything be okey and stuff like racism and deaththreats started to florish. to the point where game magazins called it the most hateful community on earth
u will always find braindead idiots who are just racist in every game with voice chat
but it shouldnt be a reaseon to sleep on voip or just straight ban anyone who is "toxic"
BF3 soldiers drops F bombs every two sentence 
"I'm up, I'm f'ed up but I'm up!"
if they add voip all i want is they will be resonable with what is allowed
if i want to call my oponent a lil camping pussy i want to be able to do it xD
They should give a blogpost with list of things that's allowed imo
👆
also just look at arma, squad or anyother simmilar game
people are just havin fun
and yeah we are callin eachother slurs
for example yesterday on arma reforger as nato we were holdin off russsian offensive and man every 5 seconds someone was screamin at russians and russians were screamin at us, and it was FAAAAR away from polite xD next match we mixed teams and the people who we called (not gonna say the ethnic slurs) became our best friends who we were figthing with in one team
This type of community experience is getting lost with how sterilized every multiplayer game is nowadays lol
it is
thats why "smaller" titles are so much better in terms of their community
ofc sometimes u will meet some racist peace of shit
but than you as community u overwhelm him with your buddies of just kick him out
i was raised durin old COD peak, and if i have to be honest hearin in post game lobby that 10 man slept with my mother didnt affect me xD
lookin at it now it was kinda funny
man i miss days when games were just a way to relax and have fun with your buddies
now gaming is sooo croporized
Voip can achieve a similar goal while also being useful imo
Just give people option to report people who abuse it and give option to mute it
yep
just give people who are more sensitive a way to mute someone
🤌
budd these voice lanes added soo much immersion to the game
Yep
also imo it really doesnt make soo much sense that i cant call my oponent a (idk depands on which side im figthin XD) in a game where my whole objective is to kill 'em and i have tool to do it ranging form tanks to axes
when given an opportunity to trash talk the enemy, always take it
trash talkin enemies its just for fun and immersion
idk why big game corpos think that we actually hate on eachtoher xD
for fuck sake if u are annoyed or get sad after someone trashtalked u just mute 'em
it reminds me of this case with portal 2 i think
where u had scene where glados called u fat and parentless
smthin like that
and this one kid or his father get soo offended that i went viral
first of all glados called virtual character fattie and parentless not you in person second of all i dont get how u can get offened that easly
but im form europe soo what do i know
If prox voip does exist I’d hope there’s a different bind for just team chat and team + enemy if that is something they’d go for
There wont be a All Chat sadly, they dont want other people abusing this and calling enemies names or slurs
We did get it in 2042
You dont, you already signed it when creating your EA Playtesting Account
don't see why they would walk it back again
There never ever was a second NDA with EA Playtests
yes but in honesty. Alot of the people in games with voip just use it to troll or be funny. Most of it isnt hate speech but its usually is something that is toxic. There hate speech in all games even without voip. People will find any and every way to communicate to people in a hateful and toxic way.
No reason to not make or allow feature cause people may be toxic. If they want it in game, just allow ppl to turn curtain features like those off or mute. Not allowing things to be added to a game for fun because theres some bad apples out there gives the devs little to no power in terms of what they are allowed to do in terms of fun gameplay. Cause then everything has to be looked at under a lense to see if people cane exploit something to spread hate speech or toxicity... Like custom emblems in old cod games, or voip in pubg. All things that are gone that used to be a fun and huge feature that is no longer a thing. (custom emblems may have made a comeback in later games, but they were gone for the longest and usually dont have as much features as they did before making it alot worse).
jokes should be fine to an extent but have you seen alot of the custom emblems in older battlefield? theyre full of nazie and racism signs
that why i mentioned the emblems in cod. They have hate speech in them, but removing them just takes fun away from everyone else cause some people use them badly. Like when someone makes an emblem, allow ppl to report them for emblem. Also have the emblems being used be accessible by devs to be able to be removed by devs.
If a emblem gets removed by a dev or it gets reported. Make the emblem auto go to default for everyone to see. Getting rid of cool things cause ppl are capable of doing bad things with it just make it hard to come up with cool and new things. Cause you have to think of how ppl can use them. Just add measures to make it easier to get rid of... If a dev removes it from someone cause its a problem, dont let them make a new one for a week. If they get reported, make it go default for everyone in your lobby and when u hit menu. Lock the emblem from use until a dev either removes it from use or allows it.
There's measure to take to allow fun features in games that arent complex. It just takes some effort to put in those measure and games never do. So it becomes an issue.
yeah that's how it goes, when thinking of new mechanics you always have to think about how players will break and abuse it. If it was that easy to moderate they'd have brought emblems back, but they haven't
same with the chat, if people can't behave with it then it'll just get removed
Thats why you make it hide and lock out the emblem until its reviewed. If they decide to review them. It just makes the ppl take more time in creating them than actually using them and allowing ppl to see them
then they have tens of thousands of emblems to review
and who's going to do all that
it'd still happen but alot less. And for most ppl it wouldnt be worth
Manual reviews aren't gonna happen
i said if they decided too
and they're not gonna create a tool for it either
these things always sound great in theory (they don't) but when you think about it a little further you realise how unrealistic it is
waste of time and money
there is no if, they never will
it's the biggest waste of time and resources imaginable
the only thing i can imagine, which someone suggested a few weeks ago, is an ai based filter
but there's way too much nuance in emblems for that to work probably
so just hiding a emblem that gets reported. And NOT having them review is to much time and resources?
that takes WAY more effort and time than them just not reviewing them
i mean sure if everyone does it and not 1 person can look at emblems.
literally 1 person can do that job
it takes 3 sec to see if its bad
you're relying too much on players being good people lmao they'll report emblems for fun and people will complain
100,000,000 a day done by 1 person
lol
try pitching that to dice
"yeah we just need one guy to sit at a computer and look at like 50k emblems and decide at his own discretion if they're allowed or not"
sounds like you are allowing a company to simply take a easy way out and not add fun features instead of taking measures to increase player enjoyment. Also could just add a feature no not see them as a option... Like how you can remove hud options. Like theres things you can do
could also just add a settings toggle to hide them
yup



