#battlefield-labs-discussion
1 messages · Page 32 of 1
my brother in christ, they dedicated almost an entire reveal in 2042 to "battlefield" moments in order to pander to veterans and try to wow the younger audience. the result was a bombastic, hilariously hollywood esque presentation that featured zero gameplay just to build hype. where did this get them?
"bf moment" monetization? stuff that should happen naturally shown to be happening as frequently as possible? they've overplayed the hand and made a mockery of an organic curiosity.
🛌
yes i am mad about it. i sincerely hope you people dont believe the 2042 reveal was anything but a desparate move.

BF3 and 4 trailers have exactly the same tone and appearance as the Labs gameplay snippet. So it really doesnt matter to me
Battlefield 4™ Second Assault features four fan-favourite maps from Battlefield 3, redesigned to take advantage of the Frostbite™ 3 engine and includes new multiplayer features from BF4. Available first on Xbox One: November 22nd for Premium members.
Own more, be more with Battlefield 4 Premium. Become a Battlefield 4 Premium member for early a...
Rise from the ashes and fight for survival! In Battlefield 3: Aftermath, players fight for supremacy amongst shattered streets and buildings across four earthquake ravaged maps. This launch trailer features footage from all four maps and features the new crossbow, vehicles, and the new Scavenger game mode where players armed only with a pistol m...
It's similar in style to even bf1 and 5 trailer wise
This is what I’m sayin
bro, naval strike for bf4 was topical and hype. where'd the talent go?
Did you get out of the wrong side of bed this morning 😄
What 😭
Like it was pure gameplay they showed too
Something tells me you’re not gonna like the new game
bsod, where are you seeing the busyness i was mentioning? none of those shots feel busy, hectic, yes.
the last 45 seconds of the second assault trailer is extremely busy, with the exception of one joke/meme clip in the elevator
i refer to busyness as a form of having a hard time to follow whats going on, or having too many points of interest
the escalator descent had one too many soldiers. some shots were too fast to transition via explosions
but busyness? hardly
It would of been better if there was 1 or 2 soldiers in the elevator 🗣️
Its a 10 second clip at the end of a 4 minute descriptive video, not a trailer
Good afternoon, people.
Morning helldiver 🫡
i mourn your inability to judge the finer print
Dude we’re talking about a video game
Being a game designer, and QA team leader in the past. I have plenty of ability to judge. You are being overly nit-picky of a 10 second teaser clip.
We should all just agree to what hes saying to make him happy
i pointed out a single shot near the bus being busy and you call me picky. we shall see whether they continue doing such shots.
Calling anything out at all, is being picky. Yes
Like extremely picky
Considering you have been going on about this for over an hour now
someone has to
game what we all want but we will not get
hardly. i have numerous cinematics i did for various games, mainly because of self-interest. being picky is how i ended up in product certification
Share em?
i wont
OK, then I dont believe you
Then what are you doing wasting our time?
Man
Surely you're trolling.
You can see my attention to detail in the YT channel linked in my bio, if you wish. As "Proof" of my ability to judge
Making that statement but then refusing to prove it is funny AF tho
you arent entitled to the presentation of my hobby

BF1 reveal

Reminds me of this music videos intro
TO SKIP INTRO CLICK HERE: https://youtu.be/r-v9Aeb7Pr0?t=2m11s
Join #TwelveFootNinja's mailing list here: https://www.twelvefootninja.com/sign-up
#ONEHANDKILLING #officialvideo
Produced & Directed - Stevic MacKay
Edited & Coloured - Ben Davies
Cinematography & Lighting - Mick Hurren
Additional Shooting & Direction - Ben Davies
Shot at Wick St...
i really cant pick. 2142 is really high up there
but bf1 reveal i exclude because... it didnt have the battlefield theme
homegrown soundtracks have been mostly dead since bf4. and its a shame
*for trailers
Busy as a blow fly at a bbq
You know
i dont
It’s good that the only thing you’re complaining about is how “too much” the trailer was, shows that it nailed the bf vibes, the trailer hit the sweet spot for me and many bf vets and you can’t deny the majority is really excited for it
Look, im mostly meming on it now tho. Youre entitled to your opinion at the end of the day 🤝
of course we are. you too. i go around and judge things since its my literal job to do so.
i can hardly believe their hype lies anywhere else but the fact theyre returning to classes and removing operators.
right now that teaser is just eye candy out of reach
they'd be right though.
It’s the grit, aesthetic, setting, graphics, destruction, over all presentation
It looks more authentically battlefield than ever
That makes me happy 
It looks like remastered BF3, with different player models
Gameplay, well we’ll find out
So ill wait to see more to judge it
just to clarify, im not juding the grit, aesthetic, setting, graphics, or the destruction. im beyond that because i like it. my critique was done in good faith, because if you want people to see what they need to, adding stuff off in the periphery doesnt serve much purpose
Fair, but bf trailers are known to show an elevated presentation that what we would normally get just in a regular game of conquest. Like, it’s not like that all the time, but there are moments that are, and make the games special
might sound like im talking out of my ass, but your eyes move involuntarily to details in videos, or points of interest, eye-cathers, you see. if the point of the bus shot was to tease soldier model interactions with explosives, they needn't cram others into the scene
or maybe i was sitting too close to the monitor 
IF the point was for that, I guess. I think they just wanted to show a lead up to blowing up a building with an rpg
Perchance lol
mayhaps not thoughbeit
I’ve rewatched it like a trillion times anyways so I get it, I am just glad it looks good
Like it doesn’t look BAD
(Pls dice get me in the playtest)
of course it doesnt. it looks good. (i) would prefer if the pace was just a tad slower. like, have the time to take all of that in
no? itd mostly be done by lengthening the shots by a second or two
Eh, imo the time they gave was fine since it was just a teaser. We’ll most likely get a much better trailer when they decide to finally reveal the name
It's like Striker took a class recently and is now trying to critique everything
The shots would have probably had just as much if not even more mayhem, cuz that’s what they were going for i feel
Not gonna lie if you can't properly understand the difference between a teaser and an actual trailer this early into development i fear how you perceive the context of game development.
I know the full reveal trailer gonna go HARD and also HAM
I read Ham as ram and got lost.
It can ram too
i enjoy reading and watching numerous things. one of which are well done videos. thatd include compilations, real life documentaries, trailers, action movies, reveals. and not just "watching", id consider it analysis. because thats what i do in spare time, i like to learn to mimic things and learn the technique behind the "why" a shot was done the way it was.
I kinda wish they would go back to the 3/4 trailer style for at least one trailer. 3/4’s trailers were really good when they showed a bit of the campaign
As a fellow ADHD diagnosee I also like doing that too
people hardly saw the 2042 reveal was a ruse and a rugpull later down the line yet they still bought into the hype. the leaked teaser honestly had a better vibe overall.
Speaking of music, really hoping they absolutely nail the bf theme for this one
Speaking of which
Best battlefield theme version
thankfully i wasnt diagnosed for anything, but if itd be anything, probably add.
Go
Crazy how it always circles back to "2042 bad"
because it is. it wasnt just a bad concept, it felt like a betrayal
i return often to the 2142 wake island theme.
It felt like a massive rugpull for me because the entire trailer showed normal soldiers we never play outside of portal while the actual game has specialists
4 > 3 > 1 > HL
Yet the trailer has specialists in it
Solid theme
Hardline has surprisingly good music
I unfortunately missed out on that one, the cops and robbers theme had me feeling confused 
As leaders. There wasn’t any specialist clones like in the game. The majority of the people on screen were soldiers
right, it was misrepresentative
i was expecting soldier customization, not operator clones
It’s basically 4 with a cops v crims theme, really good custom game modes, and a decent campaign
I got you covered. 😛
We really should’ve known though
I don’t think there was a second of gameplay footage
there absolutely were specialist clones
"haha"
they might've been well disguised but from the very first trailer could see copies of soldiers running around
they padded numbers with the bot models but specialists were present
Reveal trailer always had a focus on the new things
the random soldiers are literally just background noice
Maybe the actual soldier-looking ones. All of the unique looking ones are one-of-a-kind

its trying to sell that (the battlefield) has protagonists. it doesnt.
shield guy came up on screen twice, forget his name
he has a turret
Dozer
that's him
There ya go
Did he? I don’t remember two of him showing up at the same time
twice in different scenes i mean
Might’ve missed it with how basic his design is
different head gear tbf
Ah yeah. That makes sense
i don't think he was the only one but i'm too lazy to look at every soldier in the trailer
Would be cool to customize soldiers the way you can in destiny. Like keep it military ofc, I’d love to be able to change helmets and gloves and boots n such
bfv had the best customization by far
Tru, it was neat
ignoring hero stuff
Why stop at destiny? Something like ghost recon or insurgency would be amazing
Ohhh duuude I forgot about insurgency
That one is a great example
i wouldnt mind insurgency at all
It’s a good showcase that you can monetize realistic skins
Having literally just closed down Ghost Recon: Breakpoint, I can wholeheartedly suggest that system.
Yeah I don’t want Niki Minaj in my bf6 
i would buy a seal team 6 outfit and constantly spam the 300 kills copypasta
If they actually have a seal team 6 outfit, it should be locked behind 300 kills with every gun they use irl lol
Honestly, I loved that type of way of unlocking things back then. Just play to win the goodies is what I’m about
Ngl I hope the NATO faction is a thing and not just a false rumor and cosmetics allow us to customize the character to be similar to country X. It'd introduce a bit of variety in uniforms, but still remain grounded in reality, and you'd see a lot of different countries I bet.
impossible to unlock since all weapons they use arent in the game
its a joke
laugh
Would be cool if they had the Colombian military outfits (I’m biased and Colombian)

Yeah. Could be cool
bf2mc hotswapping should be a thing in the campaign but they wont do that
There'd obviously be an overrepresentation of US and maybe UK style units, because those are most known and notorious, but I would kill for the opportunity to roll with a Nordic Combat Uniform in Swedish M90 pattern.
Would be dope
most of these guys wont know what youre talking about man
Iirc isn’t that like a more controllable version of enlisted’s system?
ive played wt for over 12 years and havent touched enlisted once. it has hotswapping?
I’m doing a lot of Google image searching on the side 
Yeah. It’s one of the core points of the game. You spawn in as a whole squad and can switch between any of your squad members
ach so
in bf2mc hotswapping wasnt just for constant action. you had to use it to progress the missions
I loved the bf3 co-op missions
Being a co-op nerd to 1000% I would prefer there to be co-op missions/campaigns.
bf3 coop speedrunning was fun with buddies
Hell to the yeah bois
I just want them to bring back the rat
The one you knife in the BF3 campaign?
Should be the only QuickTime event in the entire campaign
Yea
Ghost rat.
I probably knifed it like 8 times
Speaking of animals
Bring back dinosaurs in battlefield 🗣️
I love me a lil T rex moment
Anyways
Gotta start my day
Nice talking to you guys
Good luck, don't slip.
What are people's opinions on having similar weapon systems in different categories? E.g. SCAR-H assault rifle and SCAR-H SV marksman rifle from BF4.
its good and such weapons can be separated comfortably
Better that type of thing, than allowing both via a plus system.
Agreed to 100%.
They shoot the same round so i don't like that idea
i'm more a fan of being able to convert a weapon through attachments if the two variants are that close to one another
obviously not with a plus system

I would ideally see that type of thing as well, but I think that'd be too complex to balance well and also cause issues of "who has what weapon category" type thing.
Bf1 basically did this instead of having tonnes of different weapon customization
I don't like the current plus system. Balance wise.
Weren't BF1 weapons a special case though? the stats varied so significantly in concept that various variants were guaranteed
I understand where you're coming from, but think of it this way (in the case of the SCAR-H v. SCAR-H SV for BF4): The SCAR-H uses a different projectile type than SCAR-H SV. SCAR-H for instance, I always imagined, as using M80A1 EPR (a standard ball round), while the SCAR-H SV used M118LR (a specialised long-range round). I suspect people think that a caliber is a universal constant in terms of damage, whereas it comes down largely to a lot of other factors than caliber.
Edit: I realise practically no one else thinks about it this way, but I, as a major military nerd, do this to rationalise it.
It's also boring, but I think we have discussed this many times.
Not really, but 2042 allows all weapon categories for all classes, something I don't agree with should be the case for the next game.
Does is it even say it shoots a different round anywhere?
AFAIK, no, it doesn't even specify a round, it just specifies the caliber of the ammunition used.
Bummer
You can pretty much answer the plus system question, by asking yourself...
Do you want a vehicle plus system in the next game. The ability to swap tank shells, sights, performance packages on the fly?
It's my belief that the plus system was good, but only inside the scope of what 2042 was. If someone asked me did I want it pre 2042 release. Knowing all I know now, I would have said no.
It would've been okay if we didn't have guns that can drastically change their performance on the fly
casually swap barrel and caliber on the fly
I really wish they would have done a april fools event where you had to actually perform the animation of what would be required for doing that.
is it really april fools if it works as intended
Ah crap, I fatfingered.
I legitimately hated this system
and is one of those things I hope do not return
I do have a really, really, drastically bad and complicated idea for the "similar weapons in different categories" thing: The player is given a platform rather than a full weapon, and from there can kitbash together their own weapon system or select from a series of premade "blueprints".
Say for instance you get an AR-15 platform, options are:
- Select a blueprint for a basic M16A4 configuration.
- Burst/Semi-Auto fire control group.
- Carry handle rear sight and traditional triangular front sight block.
- Normal M16A4 stock.
- 20 inch barrel.
- KAC RAS I handguard.
- Manually kitbash a custom configuration.
- Full/Semi-Automatic fire control group.
- Magpul MBUS reserve rear iron sight and front sight.
- Magpul CTR stock.
- 10.5 inch barrel.
- KAC RAS II handguard.
Option one would be the basic M16A4 assault rifle (duh), and option 2 (the kitbashed config) would be more similar to a Mk 18 Mod 1 carbine.
You would have unlocked two weapon categories based on the same platform; assault rifle and carbine.
But, I imagine it'd be extremely difficult to make up consistent borders between what makes it an assault rifle, what makes it a carbine, what makes it a designated marksman rifle, what makes it a personal defence weapon, etc etc etc.
Naturally you wouldn't start with just a receiver, you'd start with a "base weapon", say an M4 carbine, and then "re-blueprint" it into one of the above.
Nah, just make an M4 carbine and a M16 Assault rifle 🤣
Don't bring blueprints and excessive customizability to the game plz
cosmetic attachments tho..... those would be nice ngl
Yeah, I'm leaning more towards that, I literally prefaced the previous idea with "[...] drastically bad and complicated idea [...]".
I do like the "excessive customizability" idea quite a lot though because it'd allow the player to make the weapon look like whatever weapon (within limits) they want, without requiring a whole new weapon for every single variant. For instance, I know way too many people who want to make clone rifles in games, to include stuff like L119A2 variants of the Colt C8 which in turn is a variant of the Colt Model 725 (basically an M4).
BUT I would make it completely optional and not affect weapon performance, at all. Basically just switching out the 3D model of various components.
Idk, I just like modularity.
the only way I'd introduce modular guns is to be given a base weapon platform, and then mod it to suit the class weapon category
True!
Trailers ain't movies trailers needs to be bombastic and eye catchy. BF trailers are great because they've been doing this for years.
DICE is amazing at making trailers if nothing else. They've only really had one or two slip-ups.
"what a time to be alive" 
LOL
The tom brady poster still kills me ngl
that whole trailer was cursed
2042 reveal trailer, banger
that one, they need to put it 6 feet under 

2042 trailers wasn't aaaactually that great when you look at it more in detail
Almost every scene has a bunch of people standing in the middle of the open, 2 meters away from each other with assault rifles
It has wow moments but none of it makes sense xd
So pretty accutate to the game itself 😛
tbh some were very accurate
30 people rammed into one shipping container getting mowed down by a machine gun
I had never seen this before.
I wish things would have stayed that way.
I feel violated

idk why xbox decided to do this
Will next BF trailer also be on an Xbox showcase? It would be weird ngl. CoD was in PS shows before MS bought them and BF was in Xbox shows. There is a chance Sony might try to get marketing deals for BF now.
better have some gameplay in that case. no more cinematic showcases
Was also on playstation yt channel as well..
Man i hope they don't trow in BR or Hazard Zone again.
I'm trying to achieve the clean exit trophy and i got snipped acrossed the maps multiple times wtf
My only wish for the next installment is to be optimized
Bf42 was so bad I had to play it on console
I really hope they add preset loadouts for the next game, similar to Hardline and BF4's Battlelog loadout presets.
the first reveal trailer showed the bat lady flying off a mountain with countless skinless soldiers
Just like Damavand Peak
The very first thing we saw was flares failing to work on a condor. We should have known 😛
I'd like to see a Condor again...
and it was good until the bat lady came in
so for like 15 seconds
A condor (Osprey) with massive propellers like they have IRL would be cool. I do think they are too difficult to learn to use for your average player.
So many players still dont know how to use its different flight modes
There is the V-280 Valor tilt-rotor helicopter, that was/is slated to replace the UH-60 Blackhawk in US service.
Game should just blare in your ears that it has two flight modes
and then also flash the button across your entire screen
They can always over simplify flying mechanics
Is it...the actual condor?
Oh, no. But it is a similar concept to the Osprey.
Its funny that this thing is actually called the condor 😄
Anything but Venoms and Hueys at this point
Boring aircraft, to me at least
Not that I know much about them but who caaares
Id love if they brought back towing via air vehicles haha. Even just for the memes.
Tanks on towers all over again
Tanks on towers being useless
Let's pray in unison that the playtests are going to start sometime in the next 2 weeks
Both of them have been around since roughly the Vietnam War. The UH-1Y Venom and the AH-1Z Viper (which I assume is the attack helicopter you are referencing) are just upgrades of the Huey and Cobra respectively.
Ridiculously old airframes that should be allowed to die.
They're not allowed to start before i get my GPU back
I’m hoping that they do not implement the operator system again, just standard grunt classes please dice
Class system is confirmed already
Didn't mean Vipers but I'd prefer Apaches this time 'round
Oh thank you god thank you I can actually summon a crumb of hype now
Source: https://www.ign.com/articles/exclusive-first-battlefield-concept-art-revealed-vince-zampella
"Specialists are also out this time around. I wasn't there for 2042. I don't know what the rationale was, but for me, it's like the team tried something new. You have to applaud that effort. Not everybody liked it, but you got to try things. It didn't work. It didn't fit. Specialist will not be coming back. So classes are kind of at the core of Battlefield, and we're going back to that"
Essay incoming
Just generally I would prefer seeing a faction other than the US Marine Corps. You can only "OORAH" and "SEMPER FI DO OR DIE" so many times before you get tired of it. If I had to limit myself to US forces I would prefer to see the US Army and Air Force instead of US Marine Corps and Navy. Or hell, just throw us a bone and do SOCOM/JSOC to give some variety even if only limited to US forces.
Ideally however, and I have said this a thousand times; I would prefer for a variety of the NATO member countries to be represented. UK Royal Marines Commando, USASOC, German Air Force, French Navy, just to mention a few.
this quote is so sad
feel like every battlefield player could've told them that before they did it
I want to see Luxembourg army, would be totally cool
April fools event
"you have to try things" (to try and milk your players even more)
If BF players wanted COD or Fortnite levels of cheese...they would play COD or fortnite. Basically
It's true that you should try new stuff
Just not stuff that changes fundamentals eh
Try new things, by all means, but don't fixate on them to the extent you are unable to reverse them.
bark
meow
rawr
no
si
rawr
I feel like a pigeon that's waiting for people to throw him bread crumbs at a train station
but they don't throw them
Looking back at this I totally get why EA even tried to do this. They probably saw how most of the popular games out there were focusing on heroes to make it more interesting and give each person a back story and make money out of it etc. They completely forgot about BF as a core and just went for "Hey we can test this on our game even tho we completely forgot we got a diehard fanbase who don't want this at all" LOL
I understand "trying something new" but not even asking your playerbase through a survey before greenlighting it is crazy to me. They just stopped caring or what 😂 there must be one person at EA who was like "maybe this isn't what the players want, we should ask them first"
"Hire the candy crush guy to deliver this. Players love candy crush, right?" - EA Suit
(No offence to mr. candy crush guy, its just too memable)
I can't find the Candry crush guy
I tried multiple times now
Just can't find him
What's the audience. 50 year olds?
The problem with EA, is that by trying to get a piece of other game's cake, they fail to make their own good cake
At this point yes
You know, they try to compete with other games on their fields, so of course nobody will Play the half arsed version of a better game.
The same entitled annoying people saying "1942 was my first game!"
Let's say I'm an overwatch player. I would be in disbelief if the devs would make a Battlefield like game mode "just because it's popular" and that version of Battlefield would suck and fail
What sort of confuses me is how they still push for these, excuse my language, idiotic choices when it's so obvious that player discontent and dissatisfaction will drive their stock into the ground. It's like... You want to make money, right? Then let the players be happy to spend money on it.
Maybe I am naive or ignorant but it just seems so incredibly stupid.
LOLL
No language to excuse, and no, you're not ignorant
The shareholders are a bunch of old men that used to invest into coal mines
Hopefully no timeout here, mods...
hammer time 
Yeah, but you'd think they would have picked up some reasonable level of understanding of how the gaming market works, before investing in it.
HALT! HAMMERZEIT!
Just google "battlefield candy crush"...then set search date to the year 2042 released.
Battlefield themed Candy Crush? 👀
Maybe I shouldn't be throwing that kind of idea around though...
its not just shareholders. CEO's, boards of directors, generally people who shouldnt have positions they should and people who stick their noses where they dont belong.
He's helping out Ubisoft now. Good for them ;)
The whole package
Probably just a bunch of bootlicking, nepotism and god knows what else
nothing wrong with wanting more revenue. nothing wrong with trying to make products that sell well. but you cant predict the market. hopefully, there hardly is any other game akin to battlefield. it essentially created its own ecosphere. and for some fucking reason, theyre trying to add INVASIVE SPECIES into it
While I am glad that he's no longer at EA, I would be much happier if he was out of the business entirely, since I happen to enjoy SOME Ubisoft games like Ghost Recon and am reasonably excited for the next alleged Ghost Recon game.
Ghost Recon battle royale is all you're gonna get
I will throw a pile of poo at the game directors' office window if that happens.
Being a fan of Ubisoft games means being in eternal torment
It's not too bright with Battlefield either but I think this one's gonna be great
I'm cautiously optimistic, I was bitten hard by the rollercoaster that was Ready or Not's testing experience.
Na. Its more liklely its a case of "We tried it your way...now you do it ours" after the failure that was BFV/BFV live service.
Both ways suck ass
world in conflict 2 never ever
always more holes to choose from
depends how many launch maps we get
bf3 premium was ahead of the game
Agreed, Waygyanba.
It did divide the playerbase
*BF1 premium
Live service is a great concept that is hard to execute for most
okay fair point, bf1 post launch content was good
You could play all maps and content as long as 1 person in your party had the DLCs.
the first dlc with frontlines was so much fun
people who had and didnt have money?
I couldn't run the game at a 50% resolution scale back then lol
yes
Spending 60 for da game and 60 for da premium isn't ideal
so people who had a job and those who had to beg for it
I think this is the way to do it, it doesn't shut out parts of the community but still encourages people to purchase the content themselves.
man, looking at games today, i wouldnt mind spending 120 euros for 3 years of entertainment
That would make them even less money
So never, ever, ever, ever, ever, and ever (just to emphasize) will it happen
but it did? in bf1
how much sales they get for the new bf doesnt take post launch content into equation yet
Live service is just a better concept that they can't execute for shyt
first they need to prove theyre capable of making a title worthy of the franchise
man, ea cant into long term planning. look at their sportsball games
they want quick and easy returns, year in year out
Tell 'em that
and get hit in the face by wads of cash?
DLCs are reliable but the potential of a great live service game outshines it
FOR THEM
bad
Live service is awesome if properly planned for, even DLC cycles. one is just more engaged than the other
Never understood why they never just made this:
-Premium (paid): Early Access (Let's say one month) to all new content
-F2P: Get all content for Free, but one month later than premium players.
This way, There is no debate about "splitting the playerbase" since after one month everybody would be on equal grounds
It can also be any arbitrary amount of time you wish
A lot of people would just wait it out
True, but most impatient people would still pay
people will always argue to hell when thye dont get somethiing
gamers are whiney kids
True
Problem with those models and why no modern publisher would advocate for them, is you have a contractual obligation to see through an amount of content. Live service means you can pull the plug whenever it makes lucrative sense.
i loved the paid dlc model but im tired of seeing dead maps because the company doesnt know what to do with it
and convincing a big company like EA is next to impossible soo
if they forget to make all previous dlc's free, then rip playerbase when the game is older

because for one month you'd still split the player base
but that is a cool idea
But no content would be dead
Live service sounds great in theory but rarely works in practice
Publishers have an incentive to charge the most money and in return drip feed as little content as possible
The amount of F2P players would prevent the servers from dying
BF3 and BF4s premium model was a better cycle than live service battlepass garbage
BF3 was just pure bliss
I also loved all the behind the scenes video they were doing
With interviews and all
Damn, I wish there was a BF3 concept art book 😭
The biggest advantage of the premium pass is that it forced DICE to have concrete timelines for the DLCs
And we got WAY better maps under that model, plus a bunch of great guns and new gadgets
Exactly
Special mention to my beloved BF1 DLC maps as well. (Even though I still believe it to be a travesty to have the French faction as DLC and the Russian DLC split in two)
BF3 aftermath and armored kill, BF4 dragon's teeth and final stand were total bangers
Not that much a fan of Dragon's teeth, but you're absolutely right
Like what was the most notable addition in any of the BF2042 seasons? A scoreboard?
Redacted map, if you ask me.
The effort it took to make premium addons was much better for the series than the move to a content factory live service
Some of the best maps in the series were from BF3 and BF4 DLC packs
Pearl Market, Sharqi Peninsula, Propaganda, Ziba Tower, etc.
2042 didn't have much content because it was a sunken ship right from the start
Don't have an excuse for V
No Eastern Front or Dday remains mind boggling
One of the biggest fumble in the series
Eastern Front would have been pretty cool. Could have made a load of maps in the surroundings of Stalingrad.
I've played a fair bit of Red Orchestra 2: Heroes of Stalingrad and the Pavlov's House and Grain Elevator maps in that were pretty fucking good, ngl.
Yep, not even a single player campaign or any single player content for that matter. Even Rainbow Six Siege has single player content despite being so miniscule.
2042 was made in 15 months which is honestly insane. It's laughable that they weren't given another year or two.
ok so dice go back to premium but iwth less conten? cus no DICE LA? that what u want i assome?
EA doing EA things
That statement has nothing to do with what I want and everything to do with why we will never see premium.
I loved premium, but it creates a set amount of schedules, content, etc that they have to commit to legally. Live service you can just cancel support for a game whenever. So if a game drops off before all content is complete and a publisher no longer wants the development team to invest more into the game that's draining resources, premium dictates they cannot withdraw.
Speaking of which, am I the only one who misses the Medal of Honor series?
No
No. You are not.
No
Good to know. That series is fantastic.
I've put a lot of hours into Medal of Honor: Airborne
yet many many liveservice games go on for long time. DICE promised 4 seasons, we got 7 seasons + more stuff after, crazy??!!!
many think premium automatikaly give more content, they very wrong.
infac 2042 was loked in for 12 months
1 year pass
More seasons but considerably less content
only reason previus got that much content is cus DICE LA... this is known, a true objective fact
full studio
making content
Live Service is better than DLC when done right and if the game is successful on launch. Otherwise it falls apart really quick because all the momentum dies
You do realise DICE LA still exists and is part of the Battlefield Studios team, just under a different name?
Almost every EA owned studio outsources assist work contracts to other developers, and there's many support studios also owned by EA. That's nothing new.
and did not full time post-launch BF5 & 2042
u don have to believe me, look it up online... there even talks in those video game conference thing about taking over from ''DICE Sweden'' for BF4 & BF1
different this
DICE make main game, slight post launch, then go make new game. post-launch mainly done by DICE-LA
always like this
not anymore
Jon is not wrong tbh lol
I remain unconvinced Ripple Effect making post-launch content full-time would have made for a better game.
In either case.
This is how lots (Most) MP games work tho
It isn't that he's wrong, it's that games are always worked on collaboratively.
So it means literally nothing.
There is a difference between having some collaboration, and a full on studio working on a post-launch..
Big difference

Premium got more content because people who bought premium are protected by consumer law to receive the promised level of content. Live service avoids that problem of commitment and why live service is always utilized because it is better for investors not consumers.
And only achieved by having a full studio doing post-launch.
Which has not really been a thing for a long time now lol
Core studio makes the games base, core and functionality, while other studios work on expansions. Like, once the core of your game is built, youre not gonna be able to move high level C++ devs over to making maps. Some will move over to live service, but lots of the senior devs will move on to R&D for future games
Ripple Effect (DICE LA) only worked on Flashpoint for 2042, at least publically known.
Otherwise, it was mainly DICE and some contract work (of some studios i forgot the names of, but can check via artstation). You can see who is credited on lot of things via artstation
EA Shanghai does lot of phenomenal work too
bros idc consumer / whatev. IT is just true, less people work now on post launch

I wonder what input dice LA will have on the next game.
Yeah it'll be interesting to hear 
there is no dice la
They are making something else
Ripple Effect / DICE LA..
it's Ripple Effect, and they're working on third mode/portal
aren't ripple effect working on portal
People worked less on BF2042 post launch because it had an underwhelming launch and attempts to course correct did not see drastic improvement. No publisher is just going to burn money for no ROI.
Exactly why premium will not return and why live service is the norm
less on BF5, less on 2042. For many reason, but. No full studio
less on swbf2 too
all had issues too, 
Id say that the game beating its peak player count, and being #2 in sales by revenue on steam 2 years post launch was a moderately successful course correction.
That too
Its a complete lie to state that their changes didnt make the game drastically different also
It was a really cool game. I hoped the BFV campaign would feel like it 😦
Also MOH2010 was really cool as well for the Assault mode with different types of objectives as your progress through the map
Miss Medal Of Honor 😦
I wish BF would do something like it
Warfighter was fun, but just so little content drops
Two years of investment to generate some sales when the game is heavily discounted and ultimately still follows below projected numbers is still failure to a publisher.
I liked the ammo counter from warfighter.
Feels very involved.
It's random i know but still.
Your statement was not talking about success in the eyes of a publisher. You can move the goal posts all you want tho
wat
It was also #2 in sales by revenue, not in sales made.
I never was able to play any Medal of Honor game extensively in multiplayer but I did enjoy what little I played of Warfighter multiplayer. I can't recall much from it but I liked it.
The entire conversation was rooted on the discussion of premium vs live service and the reasoning as to why publishers use the live service model. Please read.
ea would not allow dice to continue develop 2042 if it were making no money i mean that is truth.. It prob not a lot, but i see people who buy bundles a lot and they wear
so clearle game is some money!

what is yor favourite pizza?
supreme
Pepperoni, or salami on top of 4 cheese.
ʲᵘˢᵗ ᵗᵒ ˢᵉᵉ ᶦᶠ ᴷᵉᵛᶦⁿ ˢᵃʸˢ ˢᵒᵐᵉᵗʰᶦⁿᵍ
Pineapple 
with olives of course, and def NY
what is 4 cheese
4 other cheeses?
4 layer?
my first battlefield game was battlefield 5
Or sweet BBQ pizza with ground mince, jalepenos, bacon and peppers
i had pineapple pizza once and i think it was not bad, but maybe i would not try again cus it was weird
But Sausage, Pesto, Fresh Mozz, Hot Honey is my go to
Pizza with french fries on is pretty decent

i had pizza with chilis that were green one day
it was ok
I mean it's not exceptionally good or anything, but it is alright.
Mozzarella, Gorgonzola, Parmesan and the 4th is usually Fontina or Goats cheese. all shredded and layed equally on the top
The only bad pizza is one I can't put in my mouth
parmogino reggiano?
parmogino
American Pizza: Pepperoni with some extra pepperoni with another Bunch of pepperoni
Italian Pizza: Margherita
I like mushrooms on da pizza
I like it da best
Jalapenos on pizza be like yes
why is pizza name pie in america?
What?
Margherita with fresh basil and prosciutto
True
i watch video on youtube and the american person called pizza, pie and it confuse me
call it slices here
That person is an idiot I guess, I've never seen anyone call Pizza as a "Pie" what the heck? 🤣
because chicago pizza is literally just pie
yet they call it pizza
well
pie
but class it as a pizza
I like a simple pizza.
Extra Ham & Extra Cheese with maybe some pepperonis 😎
thats not pizza
i agree
lol
Definitely with pepperonis*
Fixed it for you Torbis 😉
is this pizza with girth or very deep, idk the word? it look like lasagna
Not a lot tho!
yeah deep dish
Just a couple
As long as There is at least one, you're good
deep dish
Gotta be more ham to pepperoni ratio
man i want pizza
buffalo chicken pizza is a classic
i google and it has no topping? but it lot of cheese and when guy on picture is pulling it looks amazing
buffalo like the animal?
just had some for lunch, well if you call digiorno pizza lol
Most pizza is just good. 🤤
Yeah now I want a pizza with some capocollo, sausage, and genoa salami.
Post pizza clarity
nah bruv, like buffalo sauce
i dont like microwaving pizza, but my mom showed me i can use the airfryer and omg
it works
buffalo wing sauce and blue cheese instead of tomato and usually pieces of chicken and mozz cheese
what it taste like ?
Man I haven't had digiorno in ages since they don't sell it here anymore.
chicken wings and pizza
spicy 😄
how do you do this?
Buffalo sauce is just butter + Franks red hot sauce
classically
it's basically a cheese pie with tomato sauce on top
I live in europe texas (poland), i apologise i dont know this
but i think its just hot sauce ?
it dont sound bad
but it not pizza
Yeah it's just a brand of shelf stable grocery store hot sauce.
I'm glad total isn't here to curse us with his views on pizza.
(Don't murk me dude I DO have a deads man's switch)
i think pizza is very good, i wish i could have it every week
buffalo chicken pizza, you start with your dough, stretched out thin into a round circle, lay down buffalo wing sauce mixed with bleu cheese spread across the dough, layer with shredded mozzarella and diced up chicken pieces or breaded chicken pieces however you like it, thenadd more buffalo sauce drizzle bake, preferably pizza oven (500-600F or on a pizza stone for 10-15 minutes
i am saving this thank you
😁
i can trust this guy
hahaha
or these two do it on a flat top which is pretty cool https://youtu.be/LG7eGUxGSBs?feature=shared
🤣 😂 🤣
Round table discussion on pizza, pizza is round, pizza makes the world go round, the world is round, all these squares make a circle...
it i think because pizza everyone like
battlefield many love, and many hate but never agree on what battlefield good
as english word is
subjektive
I guess cos with BF, you get what you get...and you cant just go buy another battlefield you do like haha
And now dice are wondering why they aren't making pizzas instead
yes that truth
i like battlefield so i buy them
I believe Jon has the power to unite all BF fans
who knows maybe they tried and it flopped.... bedum che( drum crash)
it does you just need to look closely
There's no proof of that
If you engage me with puns I will answer in kind, dad jokes are my language
maybe that one missed its mark
why did the soldier bring a pencil into the battlefield?
Tried to make a pizza joke...and got calz...owned
to draw fire
I wonder if they'll do weapons with unique weapon modes in bf6.
as in?
Not much you can do but you can still make them interesting.
I thought this was going to be some kind of John Wick joke XD
Oh stuff like a dual mode an94.
burst?
Fires 2 bullets at the same time
I'd love a 5 round burst SMG ala Prowler from Apex
Add the FAMAS...give it annoying accurate mag count
i mean they will have that for sure , do they not now?
Depends on the FAMAS 😉
More burst weapons like the m16a4 would be cool.
Oh by the way when I meant dual fire mode more akin to black ops 2.
First two rounds are hyper burst but it continues into automatic mode at a lessened rpm.
👈 👈 🤠
🍍
right!, i thought they had it as two rounder
It cycles down to 600 right after ^^
just give me my beretta A300 or 1301 mod 2 and were good baby
They need to bring back airfields and aircraft carriers. Instead of spawning in the sky. It’s super lame. Use Dragon Valley 2015 as an example. The airfield is out of bounds. Restrict the player from leaving the plane or chopper unless they leave the area.
Yeah it's crazy how different the technology is between cod and battlefield.
Does anyone here play Destiny 2, and find it funny that they have an accessibility setting that lets you full auto fire any weapon with a single click.
I don't mean it in a bad way either.
CoD has it too
I'd be up for one that gives the gun a binary trigger.
but it's kinda garbage 
garbage plate? mmmmm
i see new yorker has entered chat 
One of my best mates is in new jersey and the first things she did in stardew Valley is pop the garbage cans.
but are you two hots or cheeseburger?
I know it's the best thing to do in that game but it's still funny.
GABBAGOOL
I'm Australian for context.
Proscuitt
Moozarell
gtfoh! 😂

well hopefully they bring back the test arena, cause that made it easier to try things out
Also why we still haven’t had a Battlefield game where M136 AT4 is a usable gadget for the Engineer class in multiplayer.
We have?
Oh yeah bad company 2
But that game is dead now. Need it in a modern Battlefield that is still playable. (I know fan servers exist for Bc2)
Yeah i agree. Game is long dead.
Some variety would be nice.
I wouldn't even argue for portal cause that shit is dead.
I have had like once a server with 15 players in Portal. Other times just having to fight against bots and it gets super boring quickly.
drone strikes
Oh yeah i could get Bradley and bmp mastery by farming bots through the official portal modes.
Cause they fill with bots.
Bfbc2 rush defense against bots is super easy even on the hardest difficulty. They have never got through the first phase of Arica Harbor or Valparaiso
And what happened to that VSS rifle that is in the game files and can be used via FFA mode with some coding. They never released it in the game and damn I find that gun super s*xy
The vintorez rifles have always been cool.
I've always been a fan of the AKM, 74 and 12 series rifles. More of the same but sometimes that's the best as they're really simple to interpret.
I heard RU is apparently looking going to 7.62x39 with new technologies that work on making it more manageable.
Russian weapons are very cool in my opinion too. We have not seen the all time classic AK-47 in a Battlefield game since like… Battlefield 2 o_o
I'm honestly not a fan of the AK pattern of rifles. They just look yucky to me.
Well, I guess I would make an exception for the RK 62.
Idk man, I'm just not overly excited about their looks, nor the big open slot in the side of the receiver.
https://youtu.be/yNUFNSd-mvI?si=Rddpfvvaf2PUlPw3
and they are holding this gun from us 😢
I mean the BSV-M is basically the 2042-ized version of the VSS
So that's probably why
Yeah one can make that argument but it’s not just the same without the wooden stock and that classic scope on top of it. I guess so too that they repurposed it as BSV-M. Bad Company 2 just lacks any Russian sniper weapons. I know I am a very small minority but I have played every Battlefield game with faction specific weapons and I just can’t do that in BC2 Portal 😢
I'm quite excited for the new Swedish Ak rifles, though.
Not that they share any similarity to the AK other than the abbreviation.
Yeah it doesn’t look that much like an AK weapon but looks cool. My country Finland uses RK-62. It looks a lot like an AK
I would love to see more portal weaponry added
Adding the STG-44 would be cool af, though the game is already so full of ARs idk if they'd want to
But the stg does still see combat today so, no reason why it might not in 20 years
The new Swedish Ak rifles are actually Finnish produced and acquired as part of a joint acquisition programme between Sweden and Finland. Sweden is going to replace the Ak 5C/D and Ak 4D rifles in active duty units with the Ak 24 and (likely designation) Ak 26 rifles. Finland is going to replace the Rk 62 and Rk 95 with the Sako M23 series of rifles, and have already started introducing the KIV and TKIV 7,62 into service.
I don't know too much about the Finnish programme progress but I am very aware of the current plans for the Swedish acquisition.
I'm pretty sure there are still muskets that see combat, doesn't mean they should be introduced into a modern era video game if you ask me.
Okay that’s very interesting to know. I didn’t know any of this. But I have heard that RK’s are going to be replaced.
Yeah. I should have added, the Swedish Ak 24 and 26 are literally just Sako M23s as well.
I mean if they would have some rebel, insurgent forces it could be cool that they use old weapons.
Well yeah but STG ≠ ball and cap musket
Oh yeah they look exactly the same :D
Did they start sending out emails yet on who's in this playtest?
Not as far as we know.
Don’t know and would not tell if they did. Those emails are confidential
Not as far as we're aware no
I got an email, except it was about a lot of money to claim at a bank that I don't hold an account in.
🤣🤣🤣
Correct, but there's very good reason you don't see either used particularly commonly. The StG 44 used a (with the exception of a few last-ditch rifles) proprietary 7.92x33mm Kurz cartridge that has not been put into widespread military service since 1945. Yes, some StG 44 rifles were found and no doubt put to use in Syria in 2016 (IIRC), but I suspect when the ammunition stocks they were found with was expended, the rifles were discarded.
nah
i got an email from battle||.net||so it was pretty disappointing
It's battlenet I'd be disappointed too
Some are currently being used in Ukraine
They also use Maxims and Mosin Nagant rifles there. Same goes for Pvpj 1110s.
My point being that them being used shouldnt be the sole criteria for including a weapon.
T-55s for example also are used in Ukraine, I don't think that is sufficient reason to include them in-game.
If the devs want a mosin nagant in the game, then that is all the reason they need 
(also would be cool ngl)
Maybe I am a little of a killjoy, but I would rather we didn't have a mishmash of equipment from a 100-year period be included in game just because "it's still used irl" or "it would be cool".
Yep, I'm not one to dictate what weapon systems are included in any game, I'm just saying that for me, it wouldn't fit the theme that the developers are aiming for (that theme, to my understanding, being the late GWOT/fiction near-peer 2010-2020s period).
I'd rather they put their focus on weapon systems that fit that theme.
For Portal, I don't really care because in that domain I'm not expecting any particular theme to be adhered to.
I want to have fun options ^^
Nothing wrong with that ofc. There is always place for it all, as long as there is variety.
So r ppl allowed to ask when they have the next playtest then?
no. Discussions about playtests are not allowed, which in hindsight does make the existence of this channel pretty strange I will admit
Ya that y i ask lol
Give me a Block II SOPMOD and I'll be happy
Agreed, I want a consistent aesthetic if nothing else. There's plenty of iconic modern weapons across BF to choose without reaching into Vietnam/WW2 era weapons. Personally, I'd love to see the NeoStead 2000 come back
BFBC2 NS2000 with slugs was the best sniper in that game lol
I want the Beryl and MSBS Grot 
For assault rifles, I'd like to see the AEK-971, F2000, and the XM8
XM8 yesszzzzzs
I want a DshK
Lol the last time I played BFBC2 I played it with Neostad just to have a laugh and got banned in 5 servers xD
Just need to leave this here (hopium if someone from DICE reads this) everyone wants 1st person melee animations. Like seriously. Look at Battlefield 1 and all the different ways you can melee someone in that game depending on the melee weapon you’re using and the direction you’re striking them from. And heck even the position they’re in (prone or standing)
Yes please
I never got banned but got some unhappy messages lol
BC2 admins on PC were the saltiest admins I ever came across in any game xd one admin was using a cheat where he flew the UAV and was able to parachute out of it. Also he enabled chopper for his team but when I was in attackers he disabled chopper from us :D called him out and he told me I am delusional and banned me.
I hope heavy machine gun emplacements and vehicle mounted weapons shread light cover and thin walls, I want guns to feel and sound powerful. Report, muzzle flash, blood, dust, and sparks should be obvious depending on what surface is hit.
Never played on PC, but that sounds about right for Battlefield server admins
💯💯💯
BF1 animations were amazing and I still can't understand who gave the Greenlight for these ridiculous and cringe 3rd person animations in 2042
Battlefield admins are one of the reasons I don't Play Much of BF4 anymore 😦
So many of time are little tyrants or super petty
Probably trying to chase the trends in Halo/COD/Titanfall, sense those all use 3rd person assassinations
Oh I know, but damn, they made the animations so bad and janky, or straight up stupid. Especially that one where you make the enemy stand up just to put him down again
Yeah, that was weird considering BF1 had different animations for front/side/back and every stance for knives, swords, clubs, etc
Yeah DICE needs to realize that Battlefield is unique and doesn’t need to chase trends. Other games will chase them instead.
I personally don't want premium unlike many other people, yeah more maps per ''season'' is nice but you won't be able to find matches for those maps in few years. All the 5 active servers in BF3 are base game maps and conquest.
if you get an invite are you supposed to do anything else or just wait
I think there will be instructions in the invitation
If you get invited you should get an email with instructions and the likes.
BATTLEFIELD 3 ♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️♥️
Most likely you will get a key with informations when the playtest is about to start. But since you weren’t able to pick a platform when signing up, they may redirect u to a site which lets you select ur platform you want to play in and the get a key for it
Worst part is just how long they take. Not at all worth doing in most cases
Did we lose a labs channel
No.
I can’t seem to find the other one
You have it hidden. Go to "Channels & Roles", it's below the server banner
Yeah that worked. Weird though, I didn’t touch anything, it just disappeared
Thank you



Let's see if they follow BF3 marketing, next trailer was 23rd February 2011
They’re not going to release a trailer on a Sunday
Maybe today maybe Monday
Maybe neither and we just wait longer
For all we know...they have already started testing with a really small group. I doubt they are goign to do any form of announcement for playtests starting
i want to believe u 😂 im in this theory craftign hopium
Probably the most likely scenario
They tweeted about BF Labs on sunday tho
Ayyy I got my registration email
Now to simply wait
leaving millions of players in the dark sounds like a shitty idea, they should at least announce that they've started. sure people will be angry they aren't selected, but imo there's no winning either ways
They could do a teaser trailer sunday for a full trailer monday
They sent out emails stating all the info potential testers need to know
i forget bigger companies operate in a different way
this is why i follow Embark, best company 🫡
"no news is good news"
Also EA/Dice large enough that an absent of news wouldn't tank them, unlike indie devs that will tell you everything along the way
well its less about EA and more about us lol
i mean im away from home for a while anyways so idc, but still would be cool to hear something so im kept up with whats going on, but its probs gonna be months before we hear the first recap ig
Its a closed testing program. Im not sure what people expected other than closed, non communicative testing to take place.
The FAQ states that info from tests that have already taken place will be publicly shared. But not much else outside of that
DICE has always been like that, make a Big announcement then go radio silence for months
and that's fine
r*?
bro im just talking about a simple announcement to the start of something, literally nothing more 😂
No other EA playtests were announced publicly, you just kept an eye on your email, and the playtesting dash board (From personal experience)
you're thinking im talking about actual news
yeah but this one's the "biggest" they've done in their* history
like again, idc what happens either way
I mean, it isnt haha
they said that 🤷
I didn't even know CTE's were going on even when I was following BF4 and playing religiously lol
EA FC playtests had 10s of thousands of players
I still believe full reveal and real marketing will start as usual in may/June, I just hope they won't be stupid enough to think every testers will respect NDA because I'm sure 1 hour after test begin there will be gameplay of it on reddit
This will likely scale past that, but its not true that they havent done large EA playtesting before
iirc they said that themselves but they were vague on tehir words like always anyways
I wonder how many simultaneous players the CTE servers had back when CTE was a thing
to think that only ~3 million people watched the premiere of bf3 is crazy to me
compared to 2042's 26 mil
marketing is a powerful tool
Gaming has become way more mainstream, also proper internet
10x more hype yet 10x shittier game 
too powerful ig 😅
always has been 🔫
👨🚀
Thinking of games like a race...Marketting just gets players to the starting line. Its good for getting people invloved, but a bad game will just have players drop off 😄
Whenever DICE Do something it's on Tuesday
Tests haven't started yet or the NDA containts a pipe bomb that will explode if you leak anything
We'd see something by now
They have most likely did not
Well, we'll surely hear something this month
If hypothetically tests aren't started yet, at what time of the Day Do you think they would be happening? Mid-day? Evenings? Weekends?
Why announce that somethings gonna happen in the "coming weeks" and not say anything for a month
They said upcoming weeks so probably in the next 2-4 weeks
Coming weeks could still mean more than a month though
Can't they just run the server for a whole day?
They'd have to consider time zones obviously
Could but it's not the ideal thing to say
Probably not profitable, if they are paying for severs and not making money
Your right on that
Well, if they want devs to monitor servers, specific things, analyze data in real Time, I believe it would be limited, but what do I know
I know for single player Games, usually from experience the playtests are Unlimited playtest between X day and Y Day
But for multiplayer ones, I don't know
It would be a bummer if I couldn't play due to time restraints
Assuming I would be invited
I agree
I would guess that they'll have limited time windows for both NA and EU time zones. If you can't make the one you can hopefully make the other. While unlimited time windows would be good for gameplay, it might "spread" the population too thin across time.
Especially if the goal is to test the server strain or larger scale tests of game modes etc etc
It would be great if they ran the servers for 2-3 consecutive days at a time
In any case, I wouldn't want it to be, for example, 4-9PM on a Thursday or something like that
I wish more games tested that way (limited time windows)
I guess it'd depend on what they want to test. Limited time windows are good for stress testing individual things, unlimited time are better for testing overall feel of the game.
server stress testing as well for when they open the floodgates
I would assume that given the limited admission goals being around the "few thousand" mark initially, they'll have limited time windows to test specific features or mechanics. Once it expands into the "tens of thousands" mark, I'd expect a unlimited time window for a set number of days.
I can see that
I’m assuming game isn’t gonna be out till next year
GTA VI couldn't have chosen a more annoying time to release
they said their target was late 2025 but they're still contemplating between 2025 and 2026 (probs because of gta6)
I'm guessing it'll depend heavily on how GTA VI turns out.
Truth! EA knows if they release this game within the first few months of GTA 6 it will fail
99% certain they'll do an opposite release date to whatever GTA 6 is
Hopefully
Nobody wants to compete against GTA for players
especially a franchise on its thread of existence
GTA 6 is the most anticipated game of all time too
Honestly, I am not convinced GTA VI will be the banger everyone is expecting, so I could see that game not turning out to be as big of a problem as some people think.
People are slowly dropping off though because Rockstar can’t make up their mind
Truth
I'd still expect 2026 though, seems most logical to me if they want Battlefield Labs to have any serious impact.
i feel like it's impossible for it to fumble
people might be expecting too much but at this point i think whatever happens it'll be a massive success
That's why I think it might turn out to be underwhelming.
Well, a success in terms of revenue I have no doubt about, but in terms of actual enjoyment and lasting impact; I have my doubts.
oh yeah that's still up in the air
Then again I am not exactly known among my acquaintances to be a particularly optimistic individual.
You like your exquisite grammar
I think GTA VI will be have AT LEAST the same impact as RDR2
Biggest game ever, they won't let it be underwhelming
I have been told I have an archaic manner, but never exquisite grammar. So thank you(?)
You tend to talk like a nobleman
🧐
I think I developed this manner of speaking from interacting with trolls who would lose their shit when they couldn't infuriate me. I found it more amusing to just speak to them calmly and watch them get increasingly frustrated.
Furthermore, this is why I think it will be underwhelming. Because no one can imagine it being just that.
All I'm going to say is... Rockstar pushes boundaries, it doesn't really recede in quality
They haven't released that many recent games though
I still should play through the full RDR2.
worth it
I'm gonna go ahead and download it now and play it later tonight.
Don't speedrun the main missions, trust me
I tried to finish the missions as fast as possible and missed out on a lot of side content
I usually take my time with completing games and sidetracks are usually quite fun to go off on.
tbh i'm concerned for people who play these types of games only to speed through the main quest
the world and side quests are half of the experience
prime example being kcd2, i've got about 50 hours and have only done like 6 main quests
I am the kind of player who does everything in Narrative based RPG and open world
Like 100% achievements, all Side quests, activities, collectible, multiple playthrough for multiple choices, etc.
scroll down the email and read the fine print
yeah, so is the part where it tells you not to share it
bf discord truly has the world's greatest minds
tbf why would u put the most important part of an email on the very bottom 💀
i suppose assuming people will read the entire email is a bit optimistic
i do find the bflabs sign up process a tad bit confusing from my experinece
- kept saying the BFLabs survey was "in progress" since the start (before starting, after finishing too)
- everytime i click on it, it would say my labs registration is finished and i can do this other survey to potentially help the chances of me getting in be higher (i did it already)
- now after nearly 3 weeks, the website works properly and i did the 2nd survey AGAIN and only NOW did the labs thing disappear from my available playtests, which makes me confused on whether it worked initially or only now
From the website:
There will not be a rigid cadence for test sessions, but the plan is to run sessions that are at appropriate times for different players in different regions, and build (to allow for repeated testing) every few weeks. Test sessions scheduled will be pre-defined and communicated directly to Battlefield Labs participants ahead of them taking place.
So I guess it answers my question from this morning
I only sped through it because it was my first open world game
And I treated it like binge watching a show, unfortunately
ah yeah fair enough
granted some games have awful side quests that are just run from A to B
but red dead? damn
I didn't know any better
I started a new game and started exploring all around
Got all the legendaries and such
there's a lot of depth to the game that took me a minute to appreciate. It's not a game that want to be "beat". Reminds me of Westworld sometimes because it does things in the environment that make you question how aware it is, lol.
How long after being accepted into the Labs program before you recieve a test build?
we dont know yet
- it's not guaranteed to get an invite email for Labs Testing
- we don't know when they'll send invites
- no idea when testing starts
everyone wont get it at once
I honestly wish instead of saying registration complete they either tell you you're in or you're out.
Like I underatand it on a certain level but it can be confusing.
They wont ever tell you if you are out. Its not a "yes" or "no" system. Its a "yes" and "maybe in future" system
And that's a problem.
Its how playtest signups work
I know.
So how is that a problem, if they want to expand testers in future?
did something happen?
Literally nothing ha
Because you know people want to test the game before it's out (though I would be interested in testing future builds once it's out as well) and they know that but instead of letting people know whether they will have access to that and being transparent, they have to put a giant confusing lid on everything.
The people they want to test, will be asked to test. Simple as that really
Those people wil be informed when they are ready to be informed.
Lol, people on Reddit still posting emails
That's why we can't have Nice things, people can't understand simple rules (or can't read)
Maybe the e-mail is a cynical first layer test of your discretion.
do you want them to pick 20k people right now and slowly drip feed access?
what's wrong with people signing up and simply being told if they get access
the same way every other ea playtest works
Because it leaves a whole lot of other people thinking they will get access when they won't.
if they can't read that's their problem, not ea's
true, they specifically mentioned that 
it's made pretty clear that access isn't guaranteed
Yes but imagine saying access isn't guaranteed and then just leaving a whole bunch of people hanging.
yes what's wrong with that

