#battlefield-labs-discussion
1 messages · Page 21 of 1
Reforger seems interesting but the only reason I got it was cause a friend gifted me a copy
I wouldn't pay 50 dollars for it
Yeah it's a lot of money for half a game
That's gonna be abandoned in less than 1 year from now
No way I got flagged because I used Eggplant Emoji
My only interest in it was because it was getting interest from the community. Once i looked at it a little. Decided. Not worth it. Not sure what people like about it.
The modding is also seriously lacking
Which fine, not a big complaint since it's a new game but it has NOTHING compared to Arma 3
RHS got ported over at least which is great but there's still a long way to go
I just want there to be support for hardcore servers at launch. Core mode is painful.
Dice, please don't do this 🙏
What's wrong with it?
I think it encourages more tactical and thoughtful gameplay
Particularly when holding objectives and it also gives you more opportunities to utilise cover
by bracing you mean like bipoding on surfaces? (without a bipod)
mw19 mounting
i dont play cod so idk waht that is
which promotes more corner ratting than anything else 
it's basically bipod mounting without a bipod, and can be used on corners as well.
ah i see
It was kinda useless in MW since that game is run and gun anyway but makes a lot more sense in Battlefield
I want to be able to actually utilise hard cover to return fire and not hide behind a cinderblock wall waiting for my health to regenerate
assuming the destruction is somewhat like THE FINALS maybe not as crazy, there'll be a lot of dynamic holes opening up in buildings so then it totally makes sense to have weapon bracing
a good way to prevent camping is suppression (only if done right tho)
Kind of like bipoding without a bipod, but around corners and horizontal surfaces with any gun. Bf already does it for you automatically, but it doesnt reduce recoil like mw19 does
I registered for labs but just curious... do we know when we might get notified for testing or is that still too far out to estimate?
No one knows
If you get an email, then you will know. Right now we don't know when they'll start sending invites
@mossy marten Gotcha, thank you!
Yes
No battlefield ad for the Super Bowl 😎
how do u see that
They should bring back BF4 customization, I want single compensator to reduce 25% recoil 
I hate gunsmithing, I think it's stupid and I hope it never makes it into the game
Grunt soldiers shouldn't have access to weapons with 10 attachment slots, we ain't playing CoD
Gunsmithing also creates meta issue more than plus system, everyone uses same SMG with same setup on CoD due to how important TTK is, otherwise you are gimping yourself
When i try to sign up i just get an error
they shouldn't but you gotta realise battlefield games are just fantasized war games at the end
they make you feel like ur at war without all the boring or annoying aspects of war like being a slave to your leader, having to follow orders without questioning, fuck your feelings, you're just a pawn in the war you're not a hero, you always gotta be with a team you can't just solo push it makes no sense, PID'ing soldiers to ensure they're not your team when shooting at them, war prisoners, fixing your injuries manually or having a field medic dedicated to fixing your wounds, sometimes you gotta fight with one limb only, reviving someone being more of a task than just a simple defib, etc.
Well yeah, but gunsmithing is a milisim feature in the first place. People think CoD invented that stuff but it existed in milisims for years. CoD popularized it. Arcade shooters shouldn't have 30 different variables for a single gun. CoD became clunky when they introduced gunsmithing because you need to make those attachments mean something so weapons are slower than ever, has pretty bad sway, has pretty bad ADS speeds, has pretty bad flinch values etc. with attachments those weapons starts to feel good and I dislike that, I think a base gun should feel good from the start otherwise people won't even give a chance to them. People were recommending the visual attachment idea but I am not a fan of that too. People will say what's the point of having visual attachments when they don't effect stats.
I liked the ability to change attachments during a match in 2042, but I preferred the simpler customization in BFBC2 and BF3/4 where there each attachment had a larger effect on your weapon. I would like the ability to screw on/take off a suppressor though
I'm not the biggest fan of plus system but I think it makes it unique among generic gunsmith fps games
I would be fine if next game removed mag types and mag size in favor of ''accessory'' segment from BF4
I think Crysis did live attachments first
Yeah but no one else used it besides Crysis and I think Homefront
If we're getting an actual campaign again, I want the ability to switch between soldiers like in BF2, I don't know why that mechanic isn't in more games
My biggest issue with gunsmithing is the ability to create no recoil weapons and ability to create 60 round mag weapons. It's against the typical arcade shooter balance. If a gun has low recoil it should have low RPM/high TTK. If a gun has more ammo than others in it's class it should have some negatives for it's mag advantage. But in games with gunsmithing(Delta Force for example) you can create no recoil, max muzzle velocity weapons with pretty much any weapon. So all that matters is TTK. Everyone eventually picks the lowest TTK weapon and makes it a no recoil gun with 60 round mag. Selbstlader 1906 in BFV is the perfect example of a balanced high mag weapon imo. It has G43 damage values or similar to that but has awful recoil and awful fire rate. Normally would be an F tier weapon but it has a 26 round mag, more than any of the DMRs in BFV with the ability to mag reload so reloads are also fast, so even if you aren't getting crazy high TTK of other weapons or accuracy of them you will get a spray and pray DMR that surprisingly works.
This for real
When I play 2042 I just don't feel attached to my guns like in BF4 and BF3
AEK-971 with Kobra and grenade launcher had been my go-to in every battlefield since BFBC2
I'd also like to see the Neostead 2000 back
I mained 416 in BF3 too bad it's shit in 2042 
M16 is good but it doesn't have T1 skins so I don't want to grind it 
the first time homefront has been mentioned since 2020
my 2 cents on gunsmithing, especially in 2042, is every gun can just turn into a completely different type of gun so its just like "what baseline do you like the most" with p much all of 'em getting enough options to make it so none really have an identity outside of whatever skins they got, or the sounds. t1'd every ar, a few dmrs, and smgs and can say that there's no reason to use any guns outside of the most basic gun aka m5a3, which i think overall sucks as a system
2042 doesn't have the same gunsmithing, gunsmithing is something like Tarkov or CoD's customization. Being able to change barrels, grips, stocks, having lasers on every rail etc.
make it more strict on options and the trade-offs otherwise it alll just sucks, so I hope they go back to bf4's customization where it makes improvements but never changes the gun to fill multiple niches at once rather than one extra bit or something. I liked making slug shotguns into really hard to use snipers in bf4, but i wouldn't want to be able to swap from clearing halls to countersniping on the fly with no downsides in the slightest.
ooooo i see what you mean now
i thought cods was p similar to 2042s, though I only played launch warzone for like 20 hours or so and don't remember much, so
Nah, in CoD you have like 5-8 attachment slots per weapon. You can make every gun to have 0 recoil, not like it matters because it's CoD so every gun has no recoil anyways.
I agree about BF4 customization being the best though, BF4 had 4 attachment slots with fairly important effect on your weapon. I prefer that over having 8 attachments with minimal impact. You couldn't have extended mags in BF4 too so if a weapon like P90 had a 50 round mag it was a big deal. No one uses PP in BO6 for example because you can have 50 round drum mags on any other SMG. So everyone just uses 50 round drum mags on low TTK guns such as MP5 or Jackal instead.
It's even worse in Delta Force, Enders refuses to make sniper guides because he knows game would be unplayable if he taught people how to build snipers 😂 You don't even have an attachment limit in that game, you can slap on like 10-15 attachments to a gun.
The problem with more fleshed out customisation is that it doesn't apply to all guns equally
And Battlefield has A LOT of guns
Take the ability to swap barrel lengths for instance
On something like an HK 416
With a 14.5" barrel you're running what is effectively an assault rifle but if you swap that for a 10.5" barrel, congratulations you've made it a carbine
Which makes the distinction between AR and carbine for classes kinda useless
I thought the same when I played BF4
Yeah I would rather have more clone guns with slight differences than having gunsmith, 416 and M16 for example, clone guns. M16 has higher fire rate, 416 has less spread(if I remember correctly). Fair tradeoff.
Carbines are ARs for people who don't want to play assault.
I don't think carbines should exist in next game
I would prefer less guns that have more clear differences than more guns that overlap each other
True I always run carbines on engineer in BF4
Except for when I want to terrorise a lobby with the Val
I'm a big proponent of giving players a lot of flexibility in terms of how they want to play
But if you swing too hard in that direction you get like 10 different guns that only differ in aesthetics
Like the ACW-R and MTAR-21 are practically the same fucking gun but with marginally different fire rates and the same range
Because Battlefield is class based, there should be things that force a certain playstyle, but not so restrictive that you're forced into 1 or 2 options per class
Yep
As far as customisation goes I'd like to see different options for handguards and stocks
Have them affect ergonomics they same way muzzle devices affect recoil and stability
Something that annoyed me in BFBC2 as much as I love that game was giving Medics LMGs and roping suppressing fire into the only class that can revive. The medic should have less firepower because of the access to instant revives, medkits and smoke grenades. It (hopefully) will force the player to not rush objectives and play more tactically.
Another small but nice change would be the addition of LPVOs and variable zoom optics
I want as many guns as BFV in the next game, BFV had 82 weapons total including pistols, some of them were clones and some of them were useless but it had a great variety. BF4 had like 107 weapons if I remember correctly.
I like running ACOG on carbines sometimes but the ability to have a 1-4x optic would be really nice
Ground Branch does this really well
Next game should do that too imo. SMG medics shouldn't exist.
imo, Medics should get smgs or shotguns, making them effective only at close range, where they can fend off attackers trying to prevent revives or kill enemies inside a smoke grenade, while still making them vulnerable to medium range guns and snipers
I disagree, medics shouldn't replace assault
2042 is more balanced than BFV due to that imo. Assault is the fragger class. Support(also medic) is good but nowhere near as OP as they were in BFV.
I would say 2042 support is stronger than medic in bfv mainly due to being able to self replenish ammo
Ammo isn't as important as 5 smokes and infinite healing
You can pick up enemy weapons or switch to a pistol when you run out of ammo
Ammo crates give the smokes as well 
Support still has max 4 smokes though in 2042 with underbarrel smoke launcher, assault has like 6 smokes
Replenishing ammo is good too but I think armor + med pen combo is better in survivability
Medic was OP in BF1 and V due to the way how they balanced their guns, Fedorov was better than many assault weapons too
Fedorov + Crosshair X + Flanks = farmage
I also think there should be more weight to the player character's movements, if you're carrying an LMG, you should not run as fast as someone with an assault rifle. Or it could be class based, Assault gets a 10% faster sprint by default, etc
I think Battlefield should move to a 5 class system
Assault, medic, engineer, support, recon.
That way they don't switch out every single game
Agreed
Bad Company 1 had 5 classes
Though Medics and support still got rolled into one
Battlefield 2 had 7
4 classes should be the standard. Anymore and it becomes too niche and people won't play certain classes
People already rarely play engi or recon
Assault — Primary infantry, pave the path.
Medic — Heal, keep the frontlines alive.
Engineer — Repair and demo vehicles.
Support — Provide ammo, surpressive fire. Support the assault.
Recon — Provide intel and engage enemies at a distance.
4 classes always causes one of the classes to have too many roles
In BF3 and 4 the assault was also the medic
In BF1 and BFV support was also the engineer
More classes =/= more people playing certain classes
Yes, support was engineer, but not anti vehicle
Fair point but not everyone will play the classes' role properly, even with incentives
And assault being anti vehicle also cluttered that one too, because no one playing assault wants to hunt tanks as well
True, but the option to deter vehicles was available most of the time
5 classes would help people better communicate their roles and actually be able to pursue their objectives. It removes a lot of clutter and confusion
Well it's BF, nobody plays roles properly ever 🤷♂️
5 classes is unnecessary imo, they should either copy 3/4 or 2042 class system
Medic shouldn't be a better infantry than assault or assault should be medic
I want BFV's subclass/perk system to return though
I want 5 classes with 5 player squads, I don't like them switching roles of classes every game.
But I don't see that happening tbh
4 classes again it is
Seems like it will be basically the same style of classes as 2042
Assault is anti infantry
Support is heals+ammo
Engi is anti vehicle+repairs
Recon is campers or backline flanking
Support having both meds and ammo is a bad idea. How will a teammate know which ome you have or both? That seems to be what they're planning currently but I'd expect them to change it.
If I were to guess they're gonna give meds to assault like 3 and 4.
I'm for that.
Exactly my problem, if I'm bleeding out, and a support is right next to me, I'm expecting a revive assuming it's safe but if they only have ammo and not defib/syringe then I'm straight out of luck.
I'm a support who has defib/syringe and ammo
Idk how they're planning it, but it possibly might be defibs will be a locked class gadget that cannot be removed
But who knows 🤷♂️
insert smack head gif
I like the idea of the BF3/4 style Engineers have ammo, Assault can run medic kits
But they might have a locked class gadget like 2042 has currently:
Assault has medpens
Support has defibs
Engi has repair tool
Recon is whatever their's is currently
And then two other gadgets possibly that are locked
I.e. support slot 1 has medic bags/crates or ammo crates/bags and the other slot is some other stuff
Support had ammo in bf4*
Engineer was anti vehicle/repairs
Assault in bc2 had ammo crates
Never played bc2, i just googled
All I remember of bc2 was running around with a Carl Gustav on Africa Harbour shouting "GUSTAV!!" and cackling like a maniac destroying buildings, vehicles, people with the Carl Gustav
Accurate, but don't forget NS2000 with slug rounds
NeoStead 2000 my beloved
Y'know. After reading the class roles for BC2, it makes some sense 
Assault is anti infy with ammo crates
Medic is medic
Engi is engi
Recon is campers
It worked
It splits the conundrum of support being ammo and heals quite well
Prevents assault from.having heals like bf3/4
Still feels weird that medics got 200 round capacity lmgs but it worked
I would say change it to SMGs and give lmgs to Engis
That might work, i feel like engineers are the weakest class in every Battlefield game they're in, but separating ammo and heals and giving anti armor to Assault worked in BF1
This is actually fairly realistic to how some militaries (e.g. Swedish) use machine gunners/combat pioneers.
Basically some units have the SAW gunner also carry explosives for breaching for example.
Obviously they don't exactly run around with blowtorches but
So basically like Animal Mother from Full Metal Jacket just with a wrench
Pretty much
Most Swedish Army units use a double role system for soldiers at the squad level.
E.g. machine gunner and breacher, marksman and combat life saver, rifleman and anti-tank specialist (or mechanic for mechanised units)
Partially because the Army is laughably understaffed, partially because multidisciplinary soldiers is practically never detrimental.
However the classes end up being, they should focus on making the player spec into a specific role on a squad, and make it clear who does what in a squad
Agreed
Potentially unpopular opinion but I think they should have more than the usual 4 classes in that case.
4 classes is very restrictive, whereas something 5-6 would, in my subjective opinion, be better suited.
Remember, while it may work for you. Gamers are idiots with no nuance and will just cookie cutter classes. That's just extra dev time for nothing.
I'm aware, but I still think it'd be worthwhile in order to have more distinctive classes.
I think taking some inspiration from Medal of Honor: Warfighter might be a good idea in this arena.
This would be my preference
For a 5 class system
Yup, looks good to me to be honest.
i don't feel like a idiot 🥺
You're not. You're cute
No, he's Toxic.
Haaaa, see what I did there? Omg so funny (not).
lmao
anyways im going back to one piece
Enjoy bud
As long as they're given the best balance of purpose and a lack of overlap, I imagine it wouldn't cause any harm to the series
problem being in some cases if you overspecialize a class, it can feel like a class has nothing to offer really, so in turn you'd want to introduce something to make any sort of class split relevant at least
If I had to guess that was the problem where they merged support and medic because one on their own just didn't over enough for gameplay
though it's been a minute since I've played 2042 so maybe it does have enough content to play around with, idk
One thing I'd like to see, is from hardline. You could go up to any support class on your team and take ammo instead of chasing them around the map spamming I need ammo
Be nice to see dev Friday night servers again.
You have a health or ammo sign on your head in 2042 depending on which box you are carrying
Not in BF3 because they had SMGs
Just a gentle reminder to everyone:
The rendezook and other "Battlefield moments" they've "presented" in the BF2042 reveal trailer was a scummy and reductionist attempt to monetize and trivialize what makes Battlefield special. When I saw it, I knew exactly what was coming and I was spared of disappointment. Do not fall for marketing nonesense.
This isn't a message to not preorder, since I don't care what you do with your money. At least have a good reason to do so beyond enjoying the view behind rose-tinted glasses.
im pretty sure that if they don't hold an open beta, it will be a big loss
cant seem to sign up for the labs, it keeps giving an error in firefox
try chrome?
do you get "OOPS!
The application has encountered an error. It doesn't appear to have affected your data. Lets start againtest.?
im not sure thats a firefox issue
plenty of people (including me) reported the same problem
yeah have the same issue with both browsers
yep, even in Edge it gives that error
Maybe they ended the signups? 🤷
after a few days? that would be messed up
Afaik it's an issue with the website, not a deliberate closing of signups
yes
I doubt it, plus if they did I don't think they would allow an error to be placed which would confuse lots of people
Probably something went wrong with the sign up page and they weren't able to fix it before the weekends and now it's probably gonna be sorted out today
I kinda want PiP telescopic sights in the next game. I.e. magnified optic without the zoom level outside the actual scope tube.
Ah, I came to see if anyone else was having difficulty signing up too. Glad I'm not the only one
One glaring issue with PIP sights, is performance. Essentially having to re-render the game when you ADS can be a nightmare. Lots of games use PIP and have this issue...and its hard to know if the effect is worth the cost
What? BF3 Engineer has a Carbine. SMG were All Kit weapons
Wow, 1.3 million people applied for labs
So DICE definitely has more than enough testers to pool from
My main concern is how many just want to play the next battlefield and how many actually are committed to testing the game and giving feedback
CTE had this thing where committed players stayed, while inactive users werenaturely rotated out
All player activity can help test the game TBH. Lots wont give feedback, but lots equally will
It could just be an optional feature, on/off toggle
I doubt they will want to support 2 completely separate versions of how scopes work. IMO, thats a waste of resources
Side note on there, I've seen some pretty clever tricks some devs have used to maintain good performance, one of them I've seen is they only bump the quality of the player model while everything around them stays low res
It for sure shouldn't be a priority but later down the line, why not
Yeah the issue is that youll always have to make compromises to make it work well. I dont really have any issue with how they have done zoomed scopes in the past. So ill stick to my feeling of "Dont fix whats not broken"
That's true, currently it works fine. As long as it isn't a black screen around the scope the older games. I'm fine with it
There is also fake Pic in Pic where the scope is actually displaying things from an invisible camera similar to how real time camera projections work in game.
Yeah, ive seen some games use camera projection for things like scope sand weapons themselves.
Some games have a totally separate camera for the weapons and game world, to make weapon animation and world clipping better.
The only problem that can run into is instead of being a graphics heavy piece, it's now CPU intensive, and Battlefield already brings CPU's to their knees
Basically so the weapon is almost being render ontop of the game world 😄
I hope the next game is less crazy on the CPU as 2042 has been. Going back to 64P should help a lot
As much as I hate pip scopes for the insane performance drops it gives, I gotta admit it's superior to me compared to 2D scopes because 2D scopes give people with nausea a little dizziness
My bad, BF4 engineer had SMGs(or PDWs, same thing)
invite only those who have the bf1942 and bf2 cd keys with respective cases
jk. your chances should honestly depend on your verifiable BF veteran status
sift through the masses
Feedback from BF2 veterans would be like:
- Remove jumping, it's not realistic
- Remove hipfiring, it's not realistic
- Remove sliding, it's not realistic
- Remove strafing, it's not realistic

Remove game. It's not realistic
sliding is (insert horrific insult) anyway
such movement mechanics are legitimately horrible
Yeah it was a great thing
Last time I played BF2 was August 23 2011. That count?
right before bf3 launch, i see
Bad Company 2 was Jan 15th 2015
Sliding automatically makes games good
now that i think about it, i might reinstall bc2 for project rome
makes them slide into the S-tier category
Literally just an hour ago seen a guy say "AK not killing people in the head with 1 bullet is stupid"
Really was
That guy should just play HC
Might be CS or R6 tourist too
Every gun one taps to the head in R6, AK one taps to the head in CS
Probably an HC player who thinks way too highly of himself
Doesn't make him less delusional either way
all they need is to make it like bf3 with better graphics and they hit the jackpot
signup is broken, anyone else getting "OOPS!
The application has encountered an error. It doesn't appear to have affected your data. Lets start againtest."
I wouldn’t mind things like tornadoes and other ambient weather events returning as long as they’re implemented in a way that makes sense
On a map like Paracel Storm for example you could have waterspouts that make landfall and destroy buildings but are short lived and have a small diameter
Wait like an hour and try again
i hope the playtesting will be better than the website, hopes are low ngl

What do you guys think would be the best player numbers for each match?
I have played the battlefield bc series and bf3 and i absolutely loved them, but after that i lost interest in the franchise.
A couple days ago i found about bf labs and here i am!
I have played the games on ps3 and i loved the fact that the number of people around was not exaggerated and you could breathe a bit from kill to kill.
As far as they could make a giant map with 100s of soldiers roaming around it would be better to have a more compact experience imo.
Tried DF recently and as far as the game is good, i can't help it, players are just too much
500 players
🤓
Jk
64 is best
If they do 128 again they have to make sure the maps are perfect and not rushed
All now I’m hoping for is multiple factions you can play as for the next game and what they will add to portal. Factions I’ll love to see USA, EU, South Korea and japan VS Russia, PMC/Middle East, Iran, China , North Korea and for portal bring the Soviets and eastern front maps plus Japan and pacific maps from 1942,1943 , add BF1,Bf4, and bf Vietnam,bf2142 and bring the other games they did on portal in 2042 with it and we got ourselves a very good portal.
Max of 128, which is 64 for each team
Wait did 2042 did max of 64 per team?
God I actually forgot
yes
OK so I remember it wrong
32x32 was Standart Battlefield amounts, right?
Dementia’s kicking in
and they clearly couldnt accommodate the maps around it so you'd get vast open areas with more close quarter areas in between at points
felt dreadful to go from point to point
Yea
didnt flow at all especially in breakthrough etc
Anways, I meant the player counts per server on BF3/4/Hardline/1/5
yea
64 max is the sweet spot
would be fun to try yea
I mean, 128 could be good if there were maps specifically made for it where it had more points to capture and more POI’s
20v20 Frontlines is stale imo, 32v32 is good, 40v40 would be even better imo
The current problem with 128 is that the maps get too fucking barren
32vs32 i max for Battlefield
128 players are too much chaos and problems with maps design
Don't think 128 players was the problem
it's more like the poorly done maps
COD has working 128 players
Conquest: 64
Rush: 24-32
Breakthrough: 40
Frontlines: 32
TDM: 24-32
The battlefield maps in 2042 were like an asset flip from unity
It's like they made the intern design them
Well, the game was also not built for 128 people while supporting it
The game was mainly focused on 64 players so when the game had 128 people it just couldn’t work properly
Imo that's not true
The map design didn't fit either
It's like they never play tested that game
I mean this is how I think how it went.
you'd spawn and you'd have to walk 10 min
to get to a conflict zone
I mean the maps were reworked for 64
The maps were not made for either
they felt like they needed to make them bigger
to accomodate for some perks
The maps at launch were not made to support "classic" Battlefield modes. They were made to support the original version of the game...Hazard Zone
hazard zone was fun...
Yeah, which explains why the maps were/are the way that they are.
Too bad the rest of the game was bad that no one cared
Till this day I still couldn’t play that mode
Because whenever I try to play it the lobbies were not filling up
HZ clearly was not fun to most players, it had no players week 2...and they scrapped its support after 3 months
Nothing? At least in the launch version.
too bad it's also gonna disappear
i genuinely enjoyed portal, especially the bf3 maps
The best part was it (hopefully) made EA realise that trend chasing is not the direction BF needs to go in
Actually no, they plan to add a reworked version of Portal to the new Battlefield
the portal builder was a great addition, tho their excessive nerfing of XP was not really called for.
When they say that Portal is returning, I hope they just mean the builder/hosting tools.
I don’t know, its just said in the CC Brief that Portal is one of the things they also want to test in the Labs
I think portal should be a complete stand alone
Bring all old battlefields together and make it free to play
Na, the next game needs a big community focus, portal allows community's to build and host the modes for their members.
True that
Making Portal standalone, and not a part of the main game would be a big mistake
That would be sick ngl
The only part where the game should be standalone is IF they make a BR mode
Make that free, add a battle pass to it
I would not mind a battlepass for regular multiplayer as long as it does not add anything pay to win and it sticks to cosmetics that are "realistic"
Warzone is dying. Fortnite is itself and PUBG is well…. PUBG
they could put all the goofy skins there, make money, give us a proper campaign and a proper mp
I played pubg yesterday
like new helmets, new backpacks, tactical gloves, nightvision googles
It's more fun than ever
So if they make a well made BR, put it as a standalone and free, I think they can dominate it
overall, cosmetics that would allow to customize your class
Waiting for battlefield hurts😂😭
We are in the cycle, currently in the “Copium for the next game” step
man, I really, really hope they succeed with this one
I tried bf2042 on mnk and oh my the aim is noticeably awful
Lets see if they can break the cycle now
i'M GLAD IM GONNA BE ABLE TO GIVE FEEDBACK EARLY, IM GONNA GIVE SOME BRUTAL FEEDBACK
woops caps
It’s bad on controller but mnk u feel it more
Hopefully the next one doesn’t have that issue
did any of you got an email regarding the testings?
Nope
Only when I first signed up to ea playtesters a few months ago
Not even a confirmation on the labs lol
Yeah, there is no confirm email, nor have they started to send out invites yet.
Yeee I hope I can play it but I highly doubt especially since I’m in the uk
I want my invite in sweden to come to my post with a red stamp
Red wax seal
and a finger inside
as a point to what happens if you leak NDA
Or a horse head
it would require a lot of horses to "point" what happens to all the testers
fingers on the other hand...
It would also increase the weight of shipping...
So. Would people rather have larger content drops that you have to pay for, in a battlefield, like BF3/4, with a edition that gives you access to all of them or you can buy them individually, or what we currently have with smaller free content drops every few months?
Yes
At this point id pay
As long as they don’t charge a outrageous amount
Well I'd hope for BF3 prices. 11.99 per expansion. 4 maps. 4/5 new guns
3-4 new vehicles
There's no way they do paid dlc again
If they do it like BF3 all their dlc maps will be dead
While I would also love big DLC’s technically smaller but more often content drops are better
The way they can do is a DLC of 9.99$ that has 1 free map, 1 paid map, a few weapons that can be unlocked and a Battle Pass
Ofcourse make the BP work like Helldivers/DRG/Marvel Rivals
Where if you buy it you can finish it even if its timer runs out
OK maybe 9.99 sounds a bit cheap but the price is something that can be figured out
Undoubtedly yes. I hate the current format, I would far prefer paid individual DLC and a "ultimate" edition that gives access to all of them at a higher cost.
@safe moat I like your pfp.
I mean, considering how bad EA’s current financials are I am 100% sure they are just gonna copy COD’s style with market and battlepass
Thanks
Their company stocks fell, Veilguard didnt sell that good(50% of the initial projected sales)
BioWare got its employees laid off
I totally expect the ingame store to be a fucking hell
While I am hesitant to give Battlefield Studios the benefit of the doubt, I do think they have a pretty good understanding that Battlefield's fate is more or less make or break for a major part of the community with this next release, so I think they are going to hold back on that stuff and instead make the game attractive at launch and maybe corrupt it towards the middle and then recover from it toward the end.
Then again, the same was said about 2042 being a make-or-break game.
The thing that gives me more hope is that the new game is being done by the team that gad to deal with the problems of the original 2042
Most of the old team left according to reports
the marketing tactic is still up in the air. but they need to revert their approach to making trailers
they had a perfect grasp on how to make it look good while revealing gameplay
Fresh blood can be rather deceiving, it can either breathe new life into a game (series) or completely ruin it.
look at any bf3 or bf4 trailer
it was mostly gameplay with cinematic transitions between maps or perspectives
its like theyre afraid of turning on the recording during gameplay
or that they simply forgo staged gameplay
even if staged, it gives a sense of familiarity
even after all these years i cant get the BF3 Caspian Border trailer out of my head
Will Battlefield 6 be available for download today?
BF2's intro was very honest and has a charm of its own
While I do agree with you, this fresh blood did turn the ship around with 2042, which people thought EA was gonna abandon it
And the head being Vince Zampella, who played every Battlefield since Battlefield 1982 and lead OG COD MW Multiplayers, I do have some sort of trust to them
depends if that blood is being pumped by a battlefield pulse
there's a huge chasm between people who lead battlefield and are battlefield players themselves, and those who lead it and have little to no experience
The recent gameplay that was shown felt staged(and probably was) but I don’t think it was faked
Sure it was more cinematic but it didnt felt faked like what happened with 2042
Gameplay clips being staged? In my FPS market? 😱
because that opens the issue of the latter trying to turn BF into something "they think it is" rather than understanding why things worked
We are too early to assume I guess. We have to wait for any publicly stated info and leaks about the Labs to know about it
im just ranting. had a rant about 2042's trailer earlier today. but yes, theyre going in the right direction
Oh defo, ranting is good if its kept in a respectful limits in my opinion
i dont really care if the gameplay segments are staged or not. it shouldnt contain any extravaganza like the 2042 trailer and should feel authentic
This is a bit of a double-edged sword imo. You can have developer-players who try and shape and cater to their specific playstyle, just as much as you might have misconceptions from developers who have never touched the series before.
@safe moat said rant
No idea if this is something that has an English counterpart, but we have a saying in Sweden which basically can be translated as "too many chefs in the kitchen make for a bad cake".
Which, ngl, is a concern I have in the back of my head.
too many chefs in the kitchen ruins the food, yeah.
While I am also afraid of too many devs working on one game, I am atleast glad that they separated which studio does what and stays on what they do
Because if we remember Black Ops 6 had also many studios but all of them worked on everything of the game, they didn’t seperate
Which is kinda what led the game to its current state IMO
the last good cod was the OG mw2 and im dying on that hill
In keeping with the saying "there's a flip side to every coin"; this can also lead to inconsistencies in experiences.
The last good Call of Duty I played was World at War.
Which doesn't say much, since I only ever played COD 2, Big Red One, and World at War.
Yea, again what we can right now is just hoping and making theories
Honestly I am a BO2 MP fanboy and I will defend that game till I die
im talking about the honest-to-god mindless twitch shooter cods
BO are their own thing and Treyarch have done well in the first 2
Theories, we were lost almost in theories.
— Some investigator in the 1800s idk
BO1 and 2 was amazing, 3 was weird but kinda fun(excluding lootboxes), 4 was mid, Cold War was meh and 6 is just bad
Multiplayer wise btw
Nah but, I think theoretical discussions are a good way to gather alternative points of view on different subjects. I consider myself a bit of a theoretical hypothesist personally, so theorizing about various aspects and potentialities are something I enjoy more than I should.
Agreed
In short; Cogito ergo sum.
I am on like three quadrillion Discords dude
I keep asking this because I want to learn the opinions on this. How would you guys feel if EA copied the Market system of COD(like skin bundles) in the new Battlefield. And no, I’m not talking about the skins itself im talking about the skin bundle system
i have no idea how it works
Me personally? As long as the sold skins fit the game’s scope and world I would be fine with it
I will refrain from answering since I have no idea what that system is like, but I will remark that I liked the concept of BFV skin customisation.
but generally i think stuff like skins should be earned
i don't really mind how they do mtx, since they're obviously always going to be part of the franchise, as long as they're immersive
This. Had a lengthy discussion on BF with a long time friend of mine and the BFV customization system was the best one in the entire franchise
what is best graphic card to run battlefield labs in stable 30+ fps in low
or should i just get an xbox series s lol
No one knooooooows
2060 is the recommended minimum
if you cant pay for a minimum spec rig then buy a console
ahaa okey sorry
nobody knows yet
damn thats the minimum , next gen hitting hard 🔥
but you'll probably need a somewhat high end rig, since optimisation probably won't be done yet
alright guys , thank you !
well if u swap gpu u have to be sure that your power supply it good enough
Honestly, and this is something probably few will be familiar with, but I think the Ghost Recon: Breakpoint system of customisation is also rather neat. Very grounded in reality, could customise individual items of clothing, their camo patterns, etc etc.
soo if u have "old" pc i would recommend to check your hardware compatibility with gpu that u want to buy
yes this is the case, thanks for the heads up!
cpu bottleneck, psu, RAM, mobo, ya know?
if u buy new gpu u can get bottleneck form other parts
there arent many cases a drastic GPU upgrade wouldnt have you upping the entire thing
yup
the days of jumping from a 680 to a 1080 are over
HA jokes on you, I jumped from a 660 Ti to a 3060.
I have the min/recommended specs for Labs as a screenshot but no perms in here
sorry guys i am kinda new to pc building will look more into this in my case
guess will just get a console for now xd and build pc later
now each generational leap requires a fucking fusion reactor
if you're going to get a pc anyway you might as well just get one now, save your money especially if you're gonna get an xbox
1080 to 4080 was my last upgrade
How do u sign up for play test?
its fine! if u dont want to spent alot of cash just buy consol should be waay cheaper and easier for you, also the specs for labs and full game will be different soo imo just buy xbox or ps
aha alright , will try my best
Thanks guys really appreciated ! ❤️
For anyone interested; Door Kickers 2 just released 1.0.
i had this issue with bf1, beta was smooth 60 fps than on full realase i had 20 fps in max xD
no problem buddy
PC Minimum Specs:
- Intel i5-8400/AMD Ryzen 5 2600
- Nvidia RTX 2060/AMD Radeon 5600XT
- 16GB RAM
- Storage: 30gb minimum
PC Recommended Specs:
- Intel i7-10700/AMD Ryzen 7 3700x
- Nvidia RTX 3060ti/AMD Radeon 6700XT
- 16gb RAM
- Storage: 30gb minimum
And PS5/XBOX Series X/S
This was from a screenshot from a BF page or a Content Creator, but I don't remember from who it was since that was cutout from the screenshot 
Is there still like major lines to enter the playtest? When I was trying there were like 200 000ppl in line
I heard that we crashed the line
But do you actually hear on the internet? Hmm👀
my pc having a GTX1080 and Ryzen 2600 is starting to feel a bit old now
they already have, unfortunately i dont believe the designs are going to be what players want in a battlefield game
As long as they don’t make it a milsim I’ll be happy
I do have the minimum requirements for the playtest but my PC loves to underperform
I hope it's well optimized....
My pc doesn’t work properly until I start up a game then restart the pc
It gives me like 50 extra fps and I don’t know why
that definitely shouldn't happen
Bro needs to hand crank the PC to run 😭
have you tried a fresh windows install
Or using ILSC (or ILCS)whatever it is. It's the standy RAM cleaner essentially
Hm?
Intelligent standby list cleaner
"Intelligent standby list cleaner (ISLC) will monitor and clear the memory standby list according to the configured options parameter you set.
It should help users who have stutters in games when using windows 10 Creator update and higher version of windows."
Yeah I’ve only had a pc since April I’m still learning everything
It’s a lot to learn
takes some time
I just found the cutest damn UGS ever.
almost 8 years since my first build and i'm still learning
2042 already has that

henlo
am big fan
(not really, idk who you are)
thats ok most dont 😎
i also i'm a fan of you, suppressor addict.
I myself, am also one of them.
Suppressor superiority.
real
Nothing like a good flanking maneuver with a suppressed rifle in BF4.
Pop some smoke grenades and just go wrecking.
Oh, you're from the western half of the Empire.
I want a non-expiring battlepass system, I would've bought many of the 2042 BPs if I could but game wasn't playable back then 
Kjempeflott.
when will be available to portugal? we still are europe 😒
Well no one has access to it since there has been no invites sent out 
Be patient and there will probably be leaks of some individuals saying they got invited and stuff
Then we'll know when tests are happening.
The playtest page login error seems to be fixed at least.
if they are using their brains, they will do a open beta to stress test the servers, and thus we wouldn't have rubber banding servers at launch
too old
For real
It started as a i3 6100 with a 1060 build about 10 years ago
mine started 8700k 1070ti for playing bfv then changes to 12700k 3080to play both bfv and 2042
i played csgo using 4750hq and 950m.But i started to play bf1.then changed
I didnt play bf1 for years.
I hope new battlefield will be better
Can’t wait to get like 50fps on the new battlefield
2042 was really smooth tbh
Nice joke
Well, it can't be worse optimized than pubg, right?
im on 13900k with 3090ti so I dont know
Hahaha or bf5 stuttering
I started my PC journey with an i5 2400 and a Radeon HD 5770
I think that was in 2012...I bought the PC so I could play the PC version of BF3.
I upgraded to a GTX 680/3770k for BF4...and on the day the beta started...my GTX 680 died.😅
My first pc i dont know what it is
I started to play pc games when i was five.too young for me to remember my father's pc.
I was the same, some terrible PC that could play Half Life 1...but couldnt even boot Half Life 2.
where do i see the queue
There should no longer be a queue. If you mean for BF Labs sign up
Less users trying to sign up, so no need for a load bearing queue?
I dont know, just passing the info
Sign up works again?
It seems to be, or at least I can access the playtests site again with no error
I hope they will pick players based on games they own on EA/Steam, playtime etc, and hopefully by skill data. No randomly someone who never played these before, or dont know what is going on around them in game
When will the test start?
we dont know
Approximate start time? March or April
anyone go an invite for a playtest session for next week?
Me
same here, but i can't access labs because of this stupid error
What's interesting about the test website is that I'm not in Europe and the United States, but I can still sign up using the English page.
only en fr sp
you came from Mainland or TW
Yes, but there is no restriction on where the IP is located, so will Asian players use VPN to test it? Haha
Everyone can sign up ya'll just won't get invited
true
Yes, I found out that everyone can sign up for the test, as long as it is in the English page. So I am more curious about how to accurately avoid people from other regions when the test is issued. If the region in the questionnaire is fake,
All player data will be useful. One of the devs said they will gather both behavioral data (Where players go/what they do in playtests), and direct feedback. then use that to figure out how to make the best game
Are you bilibili's UP?
1
😋 i know who you are
I'd like it if engineers could build ATGMs or machine gun enplacements tbh
Could be fun
Battlefield 6: Fornication Update
Players: 👀
god no lol
that would be nice
have a chat?
bf5 had a lot of good mechanics, hope they look into those
Ehhhhhhh, not too sure about that, depends on the power/restrictions on such a system.
yeah I actually forgot to think of that lol
If they found a way to balance it THEN it would be nice
Fortifications were a good way of keeping players on a flag to defend it. Lots of BF games have struggled with giving players things to do to allow flag defense.
Tho a lot of fortification could be fully destroyed too easily
SACLOS stuff I'd be alright with, but since most modern ATGM systems (e.g. SPIKE, Akeron MP) are F&F it'd be difficult to implement it in a balanced way without significantly reducing the damage.
You Look Like a YouTuber
When a letter will come to me that they took me to the alpha test?
Just look at what BF4 had
BF2042 god rid of it for some reason
but seriously, idk why they got rid of it
Yeah, fair point, BF4 used more or less exclusively SACLOS stuff, there was minimal F&F in that game.
But, possibly controversial opinion, I'm a bit tired of seeing TOWs all over the place.
Barely anyone ever used TOWs
In BF2 they felt more usefull... not so much in 3 and on
They could possibly implement the anti air enplacement from BF2 as well
But it might just be too annoying so
Then again, I can't come to think of any current viable OPFOR non-SACLOS stuff.
Played BF3 and the jets made me wanna tear my hair
I like the idea of engineers being able to craft field versions of TOW/AA. Maybe each side can have 2 or 3 active at a time
One run on a tank and you're disablexd
Salut à tous est-ce qu’il va y avoir un mode classé sur batllefield 6 ?
frenchman
Now the issues on sign up should be fixed. For anyone still seeing the issue in the Discord - you'll have to clear cookies and/or use an incognito browser window when logging in
Je pense qu' il n y'a pas und Mode classes maintenat mais pas sur
Pardon, j'a apprendu francais en ecole et c'est ca...
Alors ma francais, c'est mal...
I only speak German (mother tongue) and English fluently, in French I only know some basics, so you gotta build your sentences around that...
Ich verstehe Deutsch, aber nur militär-Deutsch und ich kann nur ein bisschen sprechen.
Das reicht aus, Soldat 🫡
Is all I know
Danke, ich wunsche ihr einer guten abend.
hey guys, any word on play test invitations rolling out?
Danke gleichfalls
In 2 or 3 weeks
No one knows.
danke
We are hopeful for next week.. we shall see
its been one week so hopefully next week?
It was literally mentioned a few hours ago by Staff. 2 or 3 weeks approximately
oh fr fr?
Ah, must have missed that.
Ye
missed it too
So the playtests will START then supposedly?
Check #1335998561820872824
Or just the invites
im guessing both
either way
hope you guys get an inv 😎
Oh it says sessions
There probably won't be much time inbetween
Likewise
I hope my PC can run it
I hope we all get invites
What's your specs
Mine should be sufficient - RTX 4090 and Intel i9 14900K
just download more ram lol
No it shouldn't Mark, you'll get 10 FPS
Series X
Whut, the 4090 and the i9 is literally the second newest stuff on the market??
Do they expect everyone to get the new 5000 series?
Or what
No, you are just fine.. was missing the /s I think
since when do we need to add /s for sarcasm
Although early alpha access in many games is prior to the last optimizing, it might be running worse than it will be at launch (and if bf4 taught us anything, a month after launch will be even better)
thats silly
I think the rec'd card is a 3060TI
The specs for BF Labs are already known. Its not all that high a requirement.
No one said we need to add it, it's just used for clarification as sarcasm doesn't transfer well in text sometimes.
PC Minimum Specs:
CPU: Intel Core i5-8400 / AMD Ryzen 5 2600
GPU: Nvidia RTX 2060 / AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB
Memory: 16GB
Storage: Minimum 30GB
PC Recommended Specs:
CPU: Intel Core i7-10700 / AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
GPU: Nvidia RTX 3060Ti / AMD Radeon RX 6700-XT
Memory: 16GB
Storage: Minimum 30GB
I'm apparently extremely bad at recognizing sarcasm 😂
Irl it's already Bad, online even worse lol
Reddit already has more info about next BF than BF Discord 
''That september leak was right after all?'' for anyone interested
Yup, I got ya
"not all that high a requirement"
People still run specs below that by quite a lot 
I'm just waiting on a 50 series to pair with my 7800X3d... sadpanda
Do you guys shit pots of gold
Mid tier GPU from 6 years ago...6 core CPU from 8 years ago. Lord have mercy if you have a PC over this age lol
Everyone is at different stages. I am finally at a point where I can spend money on my hobbies. Hasn't been that way most of my life.
in the Delta Force discord, there are lots of people who run 700, 900 series GPUs
Mostly from countries where parts are stupid high in price 
People still think 1060 and 1080 are good GPUs in 2025 im sure haha
Please don't think I meant it in a bad way by the way, was just joking
Oh for sure, just painting the picture. I don't have any sad tale.. I just thought haveing 4 kids was a smart idea. 8)
I'm at the point where I spend too much money on Gaming 💀
So much that I need to save fuel on the road to the extent where I drive behind trucks to get a tow and less drag.
Or I eat only once a day...💀
Many people do have older PC's. Hell, you get government systems still run by floppy disks. Doesn't mean any new game should be able to run on those. 2060 is a fair older generation as minimum these days for a high end game pushing limits.
seem to remember the 2042 alpha ran pretty well on my PC
hahaha, no /s needed there. that's great
And if they made minimum any lower, everyone in their 30 series and up cards would whine about how crappy the gfx is and how little desctruction and physics there is too
I'm over here just angry at the VRAM on my 3070FTW3... I NEED MOAR VRAMs.. grr
How much did GTX 1080 TI cost at release
Minimum should be GTX970 and i7 4790K honestly
$700ish if i remember correctly
People just ask for and expect too much when it comes to hardware. They want a next gen Battlefield with quality visuals and destruction...but absolutely will complain if they get exactly that and it doesnt work on their 8 year old CPU/GPU 😛
oops not 2K exactly
👆
GTX 970 is really being optimistic. I got a GTX 970 when I left South Africa 10 years ago and it was already at the end of that generation.
5090 is $2k
Every game should work on my 8 year old CPU/GPU 🤷
970 was bad 2/3 years after it came out, let alone 10 😄
Oh no
Work, maybe. Run at max settings, no.
5090 is THREE THOUSAND DOLLAS HERE
woof
RIP
5090d cost 23k rmb in china
If Hardware wouldn't cost a fortune I think it would be doable for most people, but unfortunately the good stuff became extremely expensive
I wonder if the next game uses mesh shaders...and wont even work at all on older than 16/20 series Nvidia.
You don't NEED a 5090. A 2060 or even 3060 I'm pretty sure you can pick up fairly cheaply on ebay (or equivalent depending on country)
good thing i got a 6950xt brand new for $600 (msrp was over $1k) 
Actually better than 3090 in the games i play lmao
I'd be fine with a 5070TI / 5080.. just need to actually find one online. Not close to a Microcenter where I live
23k rmb =3,148 dollars
Not saying I need it, just making a comparison. 1080 was a beast for ages and look at it's price
well 5070ti isn't out yet
Right.. tiny glimmer of hope
3060 Ti is pretty cheap, that's why I bought it
8 gb vram though 😭
5080 and 5090 were basically paper launches 
I'll either buy RX 7900XT or 4070 Ti Super I'll see
Gotta get my money up at summer job
Yeah, welcome to the age of AI where Nvidia really doesn't care about gamers as there is massively more profit in using that manufacturing space for AI cards.
Intel B850 is decently priced for really good performance still. Hoping they bring more competition to mid tiers as well
dice may using ai to build maps
I need to get a job at some point in the not too distant future, unfortunately the local market for what I am educated as is dryer than sub-Saharan deserts.
I bet the tech itself of the 5090 costs only 25% of the price, so maybe 500 bucks.
Rest is for Nvidia.
So if you go to some Asian Micro Chip factory or wherever they are produced you can build your own
Even the 4070's (if you can even find stock anymore, already an issue) is stupid expensive for that it does, compared to GTX 970 vs top end back in the day
They should use AI for skins 😂
What are you educated for if I may ask
Network technician.
cool
It's a good job, IF I COULD GET ONE.
I was employed for the first time a year ago. Don't be surprised when that feeling of emptiness and lack of direction hit you.
Although tbh I am pretty horrible at writing CVs and personal letters.
The entire IT/CompSci/SoftEng market is oversaturated rn
just like economists a decade ago
I mean I just went to the Army, so I'm pretty safe in terms of my job...
Oh don't worry dude, I been through the feeling of emptiness and lack of direction in the past.
Nah German Army is volunteerly.
I'm a Student officer rn
He's German military, or more correctly called - the American foot soldier
oh alright
Big brained
Ja guten Tag
Un spricht viele sprachen
Lol
ein bischen fur mich
Ich bin ein dick Junge
I wish I could join the army/air force. I have three military bases (two army regiments and an air force base) within roughly 35 km.
dicker gibson
But let's see, if I pass the Tests I might get into the air force - I applied for the fighter pilot programm
You guys got so desperate for the new Battlefield that you just wanna go at it IRL
I get it
sieg?
Then let's go! This is the way
I'm not permitted to type the answer XD
jaegerprogramm ist gut. die typhoon fliegen, ja?
Spear 
I am not in Germany, nor am I allowed in the Armed Forces.
I think German is cool
If I pass and I'm Lucky, F35 might just worj
German is such a good language to be angry in.
I want to learn once ,to hard
Why are you not allowed tho
give up
I'll send a DM
(sends a doctors note about schizophrenia)
Herr Oberleutnant, melde 2. Zug im Sturmangriff auf die Panzerspitzen des Feindes!
That's fucking hilarious because that's literally what I sent him, ish.
STUPA
I'll have to grind my german
understanding is the first step during learning
Sturmpanzer
I feel like you should also be able to tell it from the soldier model. I still don't like the idea of one class having both ammo and meds. Better to give one of those to assault so that utility is more spread out.
I know gewhr
Swedish word for Killed in Action
Well assault was a powerhouse with the meds
Where can I complain that Battlefield Labs doesn't include a Croatian flag?
I said: Lieutenant, 2nd Platoon is attacking enemy tank positions!
Gewehr-rifle
I hope next game features a shorty spear, 2042 made me like the gun 
i usually say"ich bin mude"in office
Dunno why but I trust tiggr as if he was some sort of prophet
Ich will zu hause is another alternative.
I'll only ever believe what he says
too hard
Wouldn't it be
"Leftenant, the 2. platoon is doing an attacking manoeuvre againt the enemy armoured spearhead"?
Laura Miele is my enemy
Wouldn't "spitz" mean tip of a blade?
Yeah, but there's the difference between literal Translation and Mediation.
I find Mediation is the more practical way. Yours is the literal trabslation ofc
"Leftenant" is a pronunciation of the word "Lieutenant", not an actual spelling of the rank, even in Britbong land.
Panzerspitze is armored spearhead
We use spitz as a word for the top of a mountain
there is a english teacher in my office ,she studied in University of Göttingen
I was being anal about it
she can speak ger
Fair
i think german sounds very man!!!
Would be cool to hear some german voice lines in BF6
Die Sprache der Krieger
yes, that's why i asked. Panzerpunkt, Panzer Position maybe?
Herr Hauptmann, ich hatt keine munition mehr, aber ich habe eine feldspaten. Ich sehe dir in Valhalla. ANGRIFF!
if you want to say the forbidden word you can come to chinese media or website ,you will be popular
Would it be "habe" or "hatt"?
When out of Ammo in the trench we say: Klappspaten frei!
That's literally a joke in the army
habe
I mean I won't be judged there lol.
In Germany you can get imprisoned for that
Death Korps of Krieg enjoyers
habe
Stosstruppen, what a service to be in during WW1 man. "I have an idea, instead of a rifle which is rather cumbersome and unwieldy in the trench, I'll just sharpen the edge of my entrenching tool, put on a field-made satchel full of Stielhandgranaten, maybe bundle a few together, and just full send it."
you are german?
I need you guys lobbying for a german faction
Another saying for Tank units is: Breit fahren, schmal denken.
~ drive widely, think little
You can't translate that literally lol: it's something like.
Think with your tank, not with your brain 😂
No, I am extremely Swedish.
That's the spirit
Not as much as it used to be.
Lowest we had this winter was only like -25 Celsius.
If BF6 turns out to have full Nato in it, that means I can als play German soldiers and tanks and everything -
And then be a war thunder player and complain that they did it wrong 😂
Balls of Iron Crosses.
i never suffered a weather under -5 celsius
"Only"
only...
For me the lowest ever was -16
Well, it hit -25 on like one single day, we used to be able to get like -30 to -35 for weeks on end.
I cant imagine that
But the comrades in Lithuania mentioned temps of down to -30
Every other day it was like -20 to -15
Makes sense
Which makes me sad, because I like the cold.
?
Also because I have very fond memories of being told to play outside during my time in school when it was like -30 outside and we would dig like full on Vietcong tunnel systems in the snow and shit.
dont you think you feet will feel nothing when the weather is under 10?
layered foorwear
I grew up in these parts, I know how to layer.
Glad I don't live in a nordic country 
But I would love to if @dice offered me a job 
2 socks?
yeah, when its that cold, you wear up to 3 layers
never did that
you can't afford soldiers getting cold
Or just literally try to do anything with all of those layers.. sled, shovel, play.. and you are sweating
Ok, i am too weak.
when i was a kid we had -36 celcius once (sweden), we had no running water and the school closed
Where I grew up we wouldn't get that cold.. maybe -15c... but you just added a layer if it was that cold. Or waited a bit
I might go to Europe for my honeymoon.
My old sports teacher used to be a Norrland Ranger (basically mountaineers dialed up to insane) so we were taught all about layering, building cozy caves in the snow, how to change socks without getting snowy.
Weak.
Where I grew up we had grueling 15 celcius, barely survived
I know the perfect destination for you
dont you have airconditioner?
Ice Hotel in Kiruna
I think it is in my blood.. ~75% Finnish.. but have always lived in the states
no! i am going to berlin or Munich to drink.
PROST!
I know that issue.
Nest solution is to go for something breathable underneath, (breathable, but warm underwear would do and then do just warm layers on top.
Best jackets I can recommend are the ones from Carinthia
Why not go to the Ice Hotel and drink your head off using ice glasses?
no, too cold
The entire hotel is literally built out of ice and snow essentially.
and iam going to have a speeeeeech!
I know enough about history to know where this is going.
MINECRAFT
Ok what have I missed? If the first thing I read is about jackets and ice hotels?
I bet he's intending to do it in Munich
A lot. The playtesting is over.
i played bfv and take 220k kills.
i was 7 years old 😄
you know what i mean
Hahah
the playtesting is over haha
URSÄKTER.
Bs it hasn’t even started
Nah you missed it mate
Not yet.
Mark actually
not long
Check out "history at war" on yt, makes interesting ww2 history vids, but his oldest vids are edits that are absolutely fire
The playtest will appear there
I’m old enough to drink in my country, but it’s not old enough to drink in America
20
If you will be invited
Yeah you said you were a student(?) so I could have guessed
I'm 18
Trynna get into law school
I better do
i watched Unsere Mütter
i am actully a teacher
teaching math
Future Officers of the German army at least regarding the Standard approach study during their 5 year Training Phase.
This is done in order to train them not just physically but also mentally
I study political science
I am old enough to say that by my age, James Dean had already been dead for a year.
you better start reading and massaging that smooth brain otherwise you ain't getting anywhere
I already have a decent chance at getting into one
Good film too, Math was always fine for me, although a little bit tricky sometimes
Pretty decent series ngl. RIP Friedhelm.
I have the same score as the last person that got accepted last year
true
and my colleges scores were 696.9
i was immensely pleased
Der Krieg bringt das Schlechteste im Menschen zum Vorschein.
Also studying over here is a hell of lot different to studying in the US
I don't have to take a loan
google trans
Es gibt keiner Sinn. Gott hatt uns verlassen.
we usually take a nation-wide exam for multiple subjects at the end of high school and calculate scores
you use those scores to gain free entry into college
We don't have multiple choice Tests. All we do is writing essays.
Long essays. Whether during exams or at home
I have to take 2 tests that are irrelevant to the thing I want to study. Here a future teacher and a future lawyer take the same exam
I think even future doctors
how can you type a messenge with vid in my head??
Correct translation, although I personally think that war (or combat) to be precise is bad and good at the same time.
There are many different aspects to it, but it's definitely not black and white
Dude, that fucking scene killed me.
I really know german ,but this word i can actually spell.
i watch hundreds of time
You should watch downfall.
"Der Untergang"
Absolute amazing piece of art showing the last days in the bunker in Berlin
EU BF3 server finally got populated
How great would it be if punkbuster returned...
oh no
I watched that the other day, Literally criminal that Bruno Ganz (I think the name of the actor was) didn't win an award for that portrayal.
fred'friend step on the mine ,fred became bad
Nobody could have portrayed the Führer better than him emotionally and personality wise.
Iconic scenes
Absolutely agree.
minen!!
agree
Then they let the russians go ahead.
Absolutely valid if you ask me, they probably mined the place anyways
So it's only justified that they fall by their own mines
Dude, I have forgotten most of that series other than three scenes.
- Friedhelm screaming "there is no sense, god has abandoned us" and telling Wilhelm he expects him to lead them regardless.
- Friedhelm saying it was pointless from the outset.
- The final "we were five, five friends".
you guys should prolly talk in general
I'm also a huge Star Wars Fan, but the Galactic Empire (and the Republic but only because of the clones and the First Order but the sequels are shit) is the only faction I'm cheering for.
Unfortunately the movies are rebel propaganda.
And rebels are terrorists
sry
not that i care just sayin
sry
No need to apologize
Probably, but I am reminiscing only momentarily.
Honestly if Battlefield could have a campaign anywhere near as well written as Unsere Mütter, Unsere Väter I would lobotomise myself to be able to relive playing it again for the first time.
this is what dice good at
Because BF4 tried to be anti-war but there was like no connecting to the characters.
They are working on the MP only from the vids
Yeah, I'm hoping for the singleplayer to be good coming up.
hope the ai works and make maps faster
here here!
make battlefield great again!!!!
DICE is great at making you want to lobotomise yourself
Just not for the right reasons
Tbh I doubt any current Battlefield will be able to fulfill the expectations of old fans.
I came from BF:Nam/BF2.. and I have a blast in 2042.. can top the leaderboards if I want. 😉
There's so many Anti war media, I'd appreciate a campaign which is pro and Anti war at the same time. That depicts the protagonists (from every nation and all sides) from a heroic and a dark perspective in changing and intense Story lines and battles.
That's a good campaign.
All perspectives, differenciated view, not just the classic hero Villain arc
But, if done right, I think they might be able to give another generation the same feelings about the current game as the old generation have of the old.
Dude
Global GUID ban on BF3 in Europe but on NA servers its fine
I will be the first to lobotomise myself
I fucking hate punkbuster
They were fearful of my 1KD
Lol
Well, I think it's difficult to make a pro-war campaign since we're pretty ingrained in the idea that wars are de jure bad, so no one (least of all game developers) will go out on a limb and make such a "statement"/"implication".
exactly why my PB folder is named "TheHolyPB"
do not besmirch its name, foul heathen

