#battlefield-labs-discussion
1 messages · Page 17 of 1
Hold on. Was the queue for people that needed to make a playtest account?
Hmm… Weird
Ahh. Gotcha
I’m also thinking me being able to skip the queue may have done something
Well, I’ll find out sooner or later
Leave it to the online communities to crash servers
You can kind of tell the playtest thing was rushed
xDDD
They wanted to get it out ASAP.
They really wanted to get the word out
Yeah i dont understand that, obviously the Queue is still goiing lol.
Unless you were extremely lucky and registered at a point no one else was trying too xD
Oh well, good luck to everyone non-the-less
I’m hoping other people in the same boat as me say something lol. I’m going a bit crazy
They know that the thing is buggy, they posted on the Battlefield Labs news thing they are working on a fix
Thanks New Devs
Didn’t they say there was a problem with the survey and they’ll be sending out the second half later?
Um
I didn't hear a thing about that
Oh, got it wrong. Some questions were being skipped
Ah
They posted it in #battlefield-labs-news
?
I also found a link that made me skip the queue after I had previously gone through it, only for the website to be to slow to use
But skipping it made the website extremely responsive. Also a bit worried it might have caused a problem
I'm still in on my end
I signed up successfully,but I haven't seen anything after completing the survey
You should be good to go.
I wonder if anyone has received an invitation to test
I assume they'll send emails out to everyone who entered and were ultimately chosen when the time comes to schedule a month/date/time for testing
so has the test started?
No
Pretty much everyone is either figuring out how to enter the various sign up pages, deciding to take or pass on the survey and aftetr that we're all in the waiting game
hope they wont disappoint us
When are they gonna start sending emails
crazy ahh pfp
They said in the upcoming weeks I believe but that can literally mean anytime it’s really whenever they see fit
nothing wrong with it?
?
?
??
ur pfp ahh crazy
thanks
np
sweet.
Dang its quiet here
Most likely no you will not get priority
Is there any way to know if your sign up was confirmed? I know you get the message that says to keep an eye on your email, but the registration page still says "PLAYTESTS AVAILABLE"
or am I looking into this too much
You are 1000% signed up when you see the keep an eye on your email
Battlefield V OST is so f*cking good 😌
No you can wait like everyone else
Should be selecting people based on hours played in last few games and how many battlefield games you have played. Most to least.
Its most likely a random draw like how steams beta system is but also i bet that they want a mix between battlefield vets and new players
Not anly this players. I am a veteran since Battlefield 1942 with each Addon and Game played since Release. I stopped playing Battlefield with 2042 because it was just bad. Bring players in who are veterans and know also stuff about the old Battlefield Games. BF1942, 2, 2042 e.g.!
Exactly! Pointless bringing in streamers and YouTubers who just want Every game to be the same. People that know the battlefield games inside out will be miles beneficial. Sank nearly 2000 hours each into 3,4,1,V and 2042
I hope they are bringing in a good amount of vets and new players
But most likely its random choosing
I signed up but I haven't seen any email about my signup, is that normal?
Every BF OST is, music is consistently good
2042 ost is terrible 
Post release OST is good 
2042 basically has no ost lol
BATTLEFIELD V was like peak cinema music 🎧
Kiasar Railroad(https://youtu.be/K12NbfWrlVE) was used in BF4 CTE loading screens, will they use Haven(https://youtu.be/hqj10tRPwO4) or Kiasar/Sabalan Pipeline(https://youtu.be/yhQeSvnrJQU) again?
no
they need to prefer OG Players, back when BF was acutally great, pre-V
I fear OG players will give inputs like this:
- No sliding
- No jumping
- No hipfiring
I hope that DICE will not be inspired by the mechanics from COD..
I want it to feel like you have 40 lbs of gear on
Mean no sliding yea.
Just give bf4 movement sorted.
Zouzou wouzou and rouzou?
just signed up for the Battlefield LABS, lets make this next game a good one.
we need a good mix in the end. It shouldnt be a MilSim, but it should also not be bunnyhopping/slidecancelling COD mechanics. Grounded, but with SOME stuff, imho.
I would not mind if Battlefield went just a bit more "milsim", just a bit
Dude I keep doing my user preference survey and it keeps reseting it back to all blanks
God please no sliding
BFV has the perfect middle ground imo
You have milisim features like limited healing but you also can play it as a movement shooter
Will there be a vote or something for the battlefield lab?
for what
New features
Collect player feedback
i mean
Whether a new feature is popular with players
i guess that's up to EA how they're gonna collect feedback
yeah
- end of day/test survey
- 1 to 1 zoom call feedback sessions
- smaller focus group feedback sessions post game
- being in call with EA people while sharing ur screen and playing the game and speaking out loud
- simple dedicated chat on discord
usually companies dont have voting systems
when u say "i want XYZ feature because ABC" they look at ur intentions and why something works behaviorally rather than literally they should add XYZ because you said so
okay, anyway EA it's good to listen to the players
they're bringing in veteran players too, its a mix of content creators, veteran players and new ones
u already know theres about to be unintentional bias towards cc's
like every game
is this confirmed? i kind of doubt they will have this much dedication for every single playtester, its their biggest playtests yet, most likely we'll just have a surver
unintentional? hah
this are super common ways to gain feedback from a lot of games
and no not confirmed, i haven't playtested with EA yet
you can get a lot out of listening to someone talking out loud playing a game than just a survey, so i wouldnt be surprised if they did that with a few people here and there
oh i see 👀 well then u know more than me here for EA games
Normally the survey will have a section at the end where they ask for your thoughts on the things you tested. so if they want more info, or player opions, they can look at them. These tests are likely to be very specific tho...if past playtests are anything to go by
i think they might do it for some, like CCs, but idk about every single PT
yea this
ah i see
makes it easier for us i guess, just gotta answer specific things
who needs 1on1 when they can look at the surveys which has section where you can write paragraphs
eh 1on1 helps more than u think
yeah ofc, its all up to them what they wanna do
yeah
id like to see BFV similar movement
mainly cause bf4's movement was very exploity and not intentionally made to be like that
with dive techniques
boutta hit them with the Vouzou's
be careful these tests are all under nda from the time u get an email (even the email i think)
wouldnt want those things u said work against u
cuz u talked about some detail 
i just hope they put more focus onto like mainly aim instead of who can out breakdance the other one to win
better safe than sorry
Like they could test movement speed. Then ask you:
"How did you feel about Movement speed", with the options being:
- Much too fast
- A bit too fast
- Just right, it felt good
- Too slow
- Much too slow
Let us know how you felt about movement speed:
[INSERT MOVEMENT SPEED RANT HERE]
NDA BROKEN, HE'S SO COOKED NOOO (jokes)
NOOOOOOOOOO
probably what they'll do
what i can say without breaking NDA is that the in person playtests are so fun
bro broke the nda agian
#NotMyTacSprint
"how do you feel about conquest currently"
"make it like bf2 and make the game good again" probably
nah you're allowed to say you went to an in person playtest, just not revealing any details
im jealous, the montreal studios is 3h drive away from me 👀 but i dont wanna go there just to test its so far away
If that is the first question they end up asking I know I’ll write an essay
ah gotcha, i was just teasing u
Tac sprint looks to be gone, but who knows.
pls begone
i'd love to see the return of more detailed movement animations
i hope its gone
give me slower movement speed, make me feel like im heavy cuz i am
compare bf3 movement anim to bf2042 and bf3's looks alot more lifelike
they did what mw 2019 did years before
the ARC Raiders gameplay reveal felt so realistic in the movement ngl, even tho its a tps
If it doesn't have controllable slide I'll riot
i feel like a majority of people who play games genuinely dont understand proper constructive critisim and just go "this good that bad anything inbetween dose not exist if i dont personally think this is a give from heaven its not good"
well yeah thats just natural
most gamers are... gamers not testers
a lot of people who've signed up for labs signed up to simply play early, and EA probs knows this well
just a regular gamers thoughts
yeah
People can point out things they dislike easily, but provide alternatives and potential changes? Not so much
even though it might not be able to be translated directly into criticism
everyone's thoughts are equal (minus CC's, theirs are 1.2x better
) (jk)
for real like as a support i expect to be a lil bit slower like im a big clunky person lugging around a bunch of ammunition
But even then there’s something that can be extrapolated from mindless ranting lol
enough of their thoughts on it and you can begin to understand general sentiment
yet u wiz past people so fast cuz yipee arcadey movement
tac sprint which has ZERO compromises
b-b-b-but .002 seconds slower ads
u cant
having just playtesters in a session is also a bad idea tho
truly the best way is random selection
i dont want a tactical sprint gimmie bf3/bf4 movement
I know I’d be fine with getting rid of traversal sprint if the rest of the movement stays roughly how it is
just simple walk/sprint/crouch/prone
sliding is fine as long as its not crazy
yuh pretty much
sprint sliding to cover sounds like a sick thing to do
true true and when im prone i would like it where i can turn around and like roll onto my back or what not
Gib slide to bhop and all’s good
Double hit X Sliding
I would rather have BFV style movement except for leaning
I'm not a fan of leaning
Im fine with contextual leaning/peaking.
I find it funny how many people keep asking for leaning, but will then complain when people use it to headglitch and spam in combat
leaning is cool i dont mind that its nice when other players can see you leaning
Yeah, that's why I don't like it
then in some games where if you lean someone else cant see it
2042 plays fine without it
Im fine with there being a decent skill gap, but I feel like having manual leaning, especially when there is likely to be cross play too much of an advantage to PC players
Automatic leaning just never sat with me. Too much of a faff to set up, would rather manually slice a corner and reduce angle advantage by staying further back
auto lean to a degree i guess but i like to actually be able to lean myself
Manual leaning will just create headglitching
Some good players were leaning during 1v1s to confuse the opponents too
Just don’t see much point really, being mobile is more important and you can just, move to use cover instead
You also can lean while sliding in V 
TBH, im fine with any of these things...auto peak, contextual lean/peak, manual lean...I never had issues with players abusing them in past games, or other games.
I wonder will it support Mouse and KB on console
The same for sliding, in all my time playing bfV I can probably count on two hands the number of people who ‘abused’ it
One problem I find with contextual lean is I (anecdotally feel) believe it to slow down the pace of the game. No lean causes players to strafe more or go around the corner with speed.
I mean, they already know how to stop slide abuse. every game they add it, and have to nerf it to stop slide spam. So the solution is already there.
*** R E M O V E I T***
I worked in QA for 5 years, them moved to product management. So I have seen my fair share of this type of feedback from players. 😄
I want to get into qa as a sort of entry level position, but even just being in this discord I’ve seen plenty of it
Take a shot every time you hear the word ‘clunky’
what does the QA industry consist of, what do you do? its pretty interesting and honestly for some studios i have wonder whether their QA exists or not
or if they only have their own devs test the game
The TLDR of what I do/did is...
Test and ensure that any new asset/feature going into the game is working/looking as in intended.
I take it you write said test criteria too?
The process for doing all of this are long and complex...and vary based on what you are testing.
Normally ivolves a lot of documentation reading and creation...so that all people testing have test cases to follow, and make sure that everything released meets a high standard of quality.
so it's generally relating to the stability of the game and absence of bugs and such? is there ever any testing of balance that goes beyond the judgment of the devs?
I hope BF Labs will have a shooting range of sorts so I can master the movement before playing it 
We run playtests with both internal teams and players to judge things like this. We also have feedback loops and ways to share opinions on features/request changes. But 90% of the time, its our job (At least in my company) to trust the judgement of game designers and developers.
If I'm selected for it of course
Id imagine if it’s more systems based testing over purely user experience (even if those overlap), it must require a pretty solid understanding of what everyone has made and how they intend to work to make any sort of viable test plan
For the project im currently on, I am both game designer, product manager and QA lead. So I have a lot of responsibility. But also a lot of freedom. My CEO trusts me on all of these fronts thankfully 😄
ahh okay, how did you get into it? and where do they source players to test? EA and Ubisoft have their own public playtesting service, but for other studios?
(Trust gained because of good numbers, not based on random feelings lol)
We have a discord where we have a ranking system based on player behavior/activity. So thats where we run playtests from within the community. Players are able to link their user account with our game using a bot we created. If they get the playtester role, they gain access to a special version of our game, and special channels/forums on our server.
I also implemented a forum based bug and suggestion posting system on our discord, that uses the forum tags system to allow players to report, regardless of role/activity.
I know you probably weren't expecting to spend your morning talking about work stuff, but since i'm working on a solo indie project for uni that I wanted to expand and keep working on afterwards, i've been wanting to try and implement proper QA methodologies as a sort of backup in case an actual programming job is harder to come by
It works kinda like reddit, except without the comment threads (We tried using comment threads, but other players kept trying to hijack them with their own issues ). Players open bugs, and follow a template for the info they need to add. Then other players who are similarly affected can upvote using discord reactions.
gud
github issues page in a sense
Pretty much, we were going to use GH, but the requirement of an additional account/login was too much to expect for the average player
understandable
funnily enough i've just managed to be granted access to some playtesting systems for 2 in dev projects right now, just as a regular external tester, both invitation driven. So i suppose i'll be on the other end of that system shortly haha
although as mentioned I do want to try and get to grips with the processes at play for those QA departments
QA processes are pretty easy to come to terms with. Its all just logical thought, and best practices execution.
AKA
How does X work > How does X interact with other parts of the product (Lets call other parts of the product Y) > What steps should be carried out to ensure that X works as expected, without breaking Y
thanks bsod
i feel generally my approach to things matches that thought process pretty well, bit of an over thinker at times...
Had to design this thing from the ground up and have been trying to anticipate how everything interacts, but without necessarily over designing and stunting actual development time
I'm hoping we'll get some cool dogtag and / or camo for taking part in labs, it was nice in previous titles with CTE rewards
but I shall look it up and see if there's something I can start applying now. At least then if I submit this project as one portolio component i've got something that resembles QA to demonstrate at least some understanding in that
Outside of the above, learning and understanding bug priorities is also a big part of QA. AKA, how much of an issue something is/how quickly it should be fixed. We use a priority system with low, medium, high and critical.
Low being a case of "Fix it when we can" and critical being "Stop all work and fix this ASAP". Critical issues tend to not appear often for us tho.
got a system like that present on my trello board currently, so half way there I guess
big issue I faced previous years was spending days fixing something that ultimately didn't really improve much, and ignoring actual progress with the rest
well, of course you don't want to then build up technical debt, but there's a limit I feel
Yeah, you dont want technical debt where you can help it. When we do sprint planning (Planning for the next release works) we hold a sepatate section just for bugs. Look at priorities and schedule those into that release/update schedule.
Do you tend to have devs dedicated purely to fixing bugs over implementing new features? Since i'm by myself of course i'm doing the whole lot, but I'd imagine it's a double edged sword if that's the case
could get more fixed, but that bug fixer would need a full understanding of the system, and I can already see the VC conflicts
We dont, bugs are assigned to specific people who would specialize in a specific feature. Im sure it works differently in different/larger companies tho. My project for example has 1 development lead, with 5 more junior developers under them (Not specifically junior devs, but less senior than the lead). Similar in the art department. a lead artist, several other artists, animators, moddelers, ETC.
We have many project tho, so a similar make up on those other teams. All devs report to a lead engineer (who oversees all the devs), then lead artists report to an art director (Who ovesees all artists)
Yup, pretty much.
not gonna ask what it is specifically since I know your stance on revealing that kind of info, but i wish you luck
We are small teams, but have lots of experience and can work fast. Most of us have worked together for 9+ years now.
how's it going so far?
Going good TBH. So I cant complain. No job is stress free tho. Especially with so much responsibility/expectation to deliver.
Everything has to go 📈
yeah of course. Does it being a smaller team not mean it's a little more lax?
as long as u have a good product owner and scrum master its always a breeze
Most important thing for me is making sure my team is stress free, and anything they need is ready for them before they start to work (Documentation, references, ETC. )
Speaking of, was curious about the level of documentation you do and how adaptable it tends to be. For this project and small group uni projects I tend to have a design doc and a technical doc, with the design staying mostly stagnant as to not move the goal posts before a build is ready to playtest, and the technical updating dynamically to explain new systems. Do you tend to keep your design documents locked in place before that next milestone or would you update it as you go, independent of playtesting session feedback?
I'm hoping that Battlelog returns
i imagine probably never
It was so cool to have a sort of mini social media platform for stat tracking, browsing a million different leaderboards for every weapon/gadget/vehicle/class, launching the game + joining a server through a mobile app, etc.
cause people dont like going onto a seperate website to open games
bftracker fills the void of battlelog currently
if they can integrate it well into the game itself, that would be great
it doesn't have to be that deep
We have a core "Master GDD" which houses all the base functionality of a product. Then new features outside of the base game are documented in separate volumes, but linked back to the master GDD in its index. We do this to as you say...not bloat out any documentation, or make it confusing for the reader.
how long does my green leaf stay 😭 ive been here for 4 days and already have 20k msgs 😭
The Master GDD, or any of these other documents are updates if something is changed tho.
you mean you dont like going through 2 different launchers and a website to open????
you have what
new cod be like
im joking, i took a 1y break from this server thats why its the green leaf
Everything is correctly categorized outside of docimentation tfo. For example in our org, Game Design documentation falls under the product group/department. So would be stored in:
Game name > Product Department > Game Design documentation
but been here for 5 days and its still there, so i was wondering why so long
ive been here for like 4 years and i got no regular role cause i stay for like 5 months straight then drop off the earth then return alter
never stops using
i feel u
Ah, I see, that seems like a solid way to do it. Bit like a transactional file in a sense. I've sort of done something similar I guess with a page on notion dedicated to ideas i've thought of during development, for pretty much the same reason. But my user story map still just contains the base design doc stuff
i talked a lot in 2021-2022 but then quit cuz this server got too toxic
probably almost mandatory when you have a team size anywhere above 3
just be like me and only join servers to ask a question and then never use it again
lol
Yeah, its just easier to keep track of things with how we work ATM this way. Previously (Before I was PM) they updated every new thing to the master GDD. Which made it confusing to read, especially when returning to it.
I always see it as like reading a book for research. If the reference book you use is constantly adding new chapters, especially new chapters in the middle of existing chapters...it becomes inefficient for fast reference. So instead we now add new features as reference links within existing chapters...and those new sets of documentation list exactly when (date and product version wise) it was added/updated.
They have a lot of time to do that tbh
Every wave of people they add after a Playtest or two they'll find out people who are more valuable than orhers
Depending on their goal they'll do something about that or leave it as it is
Remove those not completing surveys/providing feedback from the playtest group. Simple as that really.
Everything is tied to your ea/play testing account. So it should be relatively simple to do.
Unless they have really big test groups where a large percentage of non feedback providers don't matter.
People will do anything to get in, even fake it for a survey. They're no real way to do it tbh
What's CPT
Full form?
they should honestly remove the NDA clause, I am ok with a limited amount of people testing it, but I think the rest, which are also battlefield fans should be able to see, comment based on what we see from the battlefield labs
plus, if the game is looking good, it is free PR for them
free hype
Playtest builds usually have a lot of recorded data that is automatically filtered in. You playing a Playtest like you would normally probably helps them a lot already. Ofc if that's enough or not depends on ea
There will be public feedback loops as a result of closed playtests. the last thing the next game needs is full and open public scrutiny.
All that fully public tests will achieve is constant complaints, based on in progress, in testing and incomplete systems.
Man people go crazy speculating with unfinished stuff already
"why is the animation so similar to bf2042"
Some people rlly don't understand how game dev works and that fine, which is why these systems exist
I think a public non NDA testing will show confidence and transparency in the product. They know how high the stakes are. Let us help you make this the game it deserves to be
but for me, the most important thing in a a battlefield game is that it has to be feet on the ground
I need to feel like I am in a war, no flashy colabs skins
Feet is usually on the ground tho
I want things being blown to pieces on my sorrounding, I need vehicles, aircrafts pushing, I need war
For people not part of closed testing, they have stated this
HOW WILL THE BATTLEFIELD STUDIOS DEVELOPMENT TEAMS BE GATHERING FEEDBACK, AND SHARING THAT?
For players invited to join Battlefield Labs, they will be able to offer feedback directly and securely to the development teams and with other members of Battlefield Labs in a private Discord channel.
The Battlefield Studios development teams will be looking at all feedback provided during, and after, Battlefield Labs tests to inform what we need to prioritize, what we need to improve, and what we need to change to make it an authentic Battlefield experience when we release it publicly.
We will be publishing public recaps and updates on learnings, along with actions being taken by the Battlefield Studios development teams, so that even those who are not selected for Battlefield Labs can still come along on the journey.
Interested players can join the Battlefield Discord server for the most up-to-date information about Battlefield Labs.
cool
It is
I hope they get rid of the stupid weapon parts swap from BF2042, I hated that feature
LOL
I want full customization, in that aspect they can copy COD and Delta force, might actually be the only thing I want them to copy from those games
and as for skins, simple, give us real life military gear, so at the end of the day I can look like the military of whoever country I want
Norwegian frog men, Navy Seals, Spanish Legion, Spetznaz, Israelis, whatever
Don't want self centered useless people dressed up as soldiers tru
if I want hero shooter I'll go play something else
and god, please have weapon classes locked per class, make each class matter, I do not want a medic with a sniper rifle
Hi guys. I didn't find but the people selected to be in the labs will be able to make live streams or wil have NDA under it?
Full NDA
Thank you 🙂
Nppp
Absolutley not
Prioritize people who may not have played or interacted with battlefield in over a decade. How bout no 😄
nope
no, I for example had 2 different ea accounts (don't remember why) and all my progress and data on bf3 / 4 and 1 for example is in the old, inaccessible one
and I have hundreds of hours
I really hope they set up specialised threads again. If all feedback is spammed in the same channel amongst regular discussions it’ll be hell
They need players with experience with modern Battlefield, as well as older Battlefields. Not only to get opinions on what to do, but also what NOT to do
Mostly what not to do based on how things have gone in past threads
Yeah. TBH...I would have thought playtesters would gain access to an entirely different discord server.
One way you could do it is apply a special role to all playtesters. Granting them special access to feedback channels. But the issue with that is those roles will be publicly visible. So non playtesters will for sure hound those people for info. (If they use this server, and that system)
Using a different server maybe
You can hide channels
Not roles
That would make sense, didn’t consider the downsides of giving specific roles
Oh true
Yes, but 3rd party services can still look at the names of those channels, and IIRC, you cant make private/hidden discord roles.
Wild that discord hasn't added that yet
You can make them non pingable, but not hide them
All stuff I have had to wrestle with in my own work haha
I can’t wait for NDAs to be broken by those who don’t even know what they are on day 2
PLEASE please please bring back server browsers. By far the worst point with 2042 is Queing for every game
Day 2? That's wishful thinking lol
More like minute one
More likely, yeah
BF1. BF5 & 2024 were leaked almost as soon as the build went live, and those were to cherry picked content creators
The network test took about a day from memory
Remember the whole chinese site leaking 2042 situation lol
BiliBili got leaks instantly
Yes that
Good times
I know I’d rather not obliterate any future test opportunities by posting such things
You can directly add people to channels
But doing that for thousands is gonna be fucked
Yeah, seems like a terrible idea.
I still sometimes get random dms from people who see the pink name and somehow conclude I am a dev
So if anyone has a tester role they’ll get absolutely bombarded
I hope they don't pick people based on playtime in the series, I lost the log-in details for my EA account that I played 1943, BC1 & 2, 2, 3, 4, 1 & 5 on
So now I've got like 5 hours on BF5 and that's it lol
I wouldn’t completely rule out the idea that they might
They won't
They require people who are veterans and also newbies
If I were to host it I’d try to find a somewhat equal range from both ends of the spectrum, so fully random won’t do
You can't make a game for an existing audience only
I have a problem registering in the lab, I save my password and it remains blocked. Solutions?
Question should I wait for the new battlefield comes out or should I keep on playing battlefield 2042
New BF may not come out until spring 2026 depending on GTA 6's launch date
So keep playing 2042
Ah okey so just wait correct then
I don't understand the deal with gta6. Bf4 also came out around the same time as gta5 and it was ok.
Battlefield 4 is only 2$ on steam right now (95% off). Only issue I had with installing it on windows 11 was the punkbuster installation and needing to get an older version of C++ redistributable
Well there's an gta anime game that's coming for ps5
GTA 6 will steal all the sales of other games when it comes out
The GTA thing is all speculation stemming from them saying FY26. FY26 starts in September so my guess is that its still going to be the Battlefield normal of November'ish.
That said GTA 5, while still a big deal when it came out, wasnt as big a deal as GTA 6 what with how long its been since a GTA came out on top of its ever increased popularity. Its mostly speculation by the community and such though but its not a stretch that leadership is still deciding or waiting for GTA to give a solid release date first before they pick a date
Question is gta is still worth playing
Well that I have no idea, I never got into the GTA games too much but I certainly understand the hype lol
Me I've been playing allot of genshin impact and zzz
GTA 6 isn't going to be on PC for at least a year though, they might as well release BF6 this year
But given how PC players bought PS/Xbox for GTA 5 and RDR2 it just doesn't make sense to release it during the same time as GTA 6 still
Tbh I expect it will be just like gta5 but in vice city. Which is yet another coastal city. Maybe Everglades part will be cool.
Ah
What mode they will bring back for battlefield 6
Conquest and Rush is all I need to be happy
GTA is only coming out on PlayStation first
Rush was pretty fire in battlefield 3 and 4
I’ll be very annoyed to have to wait and not be playing either lol
But I get it
Hopefully I’m in battlefield labs and will be able to scratch the itch
Me hope they bring the story co op missions
Was perfect for anything over 1300m
I hope they don't turn sniping back into point and click
I hope they brung back the bult action sniper rifle
They should introduce wind, bullet drop + wind effecting trajectory
Only for snipers though, other weapon classes shouldn't be effected by it
If you do all that, might as well have round type, barrel length and distance be involved in the equation. Shouldnt be difficult to accomplish
Dude they should bring back the Vietnam expansion pack in the next battlefield
We need to see setting first
2042 already has those
Yes especially if you are on the current gen console
Nah, just do a whole Vietnam battlefield again. I want to blast fortunate son while using the huey again
PS5 and Xbox Series S|X same time
Also I find how the 4 studios are just known as the "battlefield studios" collective
Cause now dice won't be open to new projects like mirrors edge or starwars battlefront
And the new studio which made dead's;ace remake
It's just the battlefield people
Not accurately portrayed as wed like it to be like in Tarkov or Reforger.
I dunno how it works in them but in 2042 some ammo types gives you higher bullet velocity(high power) some give you lower(subsonic) and barrel types also effects your muzzle velocity and rate of fire
Hope they bring any expansion pack into the next battlefield 6 game
let's focus on making a great base game before any of us mention expansions
True
They won't
It will be live service
Yup, every night. What are you playing on?
Well I'm play it on ps5 but not at the moment
Sorry sentence is wrong lol
Oh I’m on Xbox. I have ps but only tried it on Xbox and pc.
Ah I do have xbox but I don't use it that much which sucks though
Yup can say the same about ps5. My bf1 friends are all on Xbox.
You can add me on there it's DarkG3Alan
Will do
And my playstation is RoninG3Alan
Got you on ps5. I might try it from scratch. Mostly medic
Ah okey
I might have re download it cuss I need to update the game and delete some games that I have
I hope they dont try to add bullet drag or wind conditions that affect projectiles. Those are way to hardcore a features to be easily understood by your average player.
Just have drop, and velocity
I only have one on there lol will be 2 now
Awesome
I am looking forward to play the new battlefield to come out this year
I know this may seem like a weird question, but how do I provide constructive feedback for the playtest? Is there a guide?
Have they mentioned platforms for Labs? Obviously PC from the start, but will consoles be added later like they usually do? I main on Xbox, but I have a decent PC I could use.
Same. 5 seconds of what I’ve seen looks amazing
PS5, Xbox Series S|X, PC
Do you think they might add a battle royal mode in the new battlefield
WHAT PC SPECS ARE NEEDED TO RUN BATTLEFIELD LABS?
• PC Minimum Specs:
• CPU: Intel Core i5-8400 / AMD Ryzen 5
2600
• GPU: Nvidia RTX 2060 / AMD Radeon RX
5600 XT 6GB
• Memory: 16GB
• Storage: Minimum 30GB
• PC Recommended Specs:
• CPU: Intel Core i7-10700 / AMD Ryzen 7
3700X
• GPU: Nvidia RTX 3060Ti / AMD Radeon RX
6700-ХT
• Memory: 16GB
• Storage: Minimum 30GB
I hope they do just so sniping can be harder 
Tired of getting shot by snipers from 300 meters away
Battlefields usually prioritized authenticity and fun over realism tbh. I don’t think we’ll have anything more than bullet drop and velocity for sniping
Anybody know?
I kind of walked away from 2042 when the seasons ended, but I just launched it again due to the announcement. It really did turn out to be a great game! Out of curiosity, I checked my stats and turns out I’ve logged 720 hours since launch. Really hope I get into Labs!!!
Yeah the launch really burned me but 2042 did turn out pretty good in the end. It had a rough time getting here for sure, though
If 2042 had persistent lobbies and map rotations for all modes. I would still be playing it TBH. I now mainly play community events and FNB on Friday/Saturdays because they have both of those things.
We don't know yet. It sounds like there's an option to have one-on-one or group playtests so you probably just provide your feedback as you play.
They may give us some guidance on how they want feedback structured or have some kid of FAQ for the it but from my experience its best to just be very descriptive on how you feel about the game and its systems. Be honest and respectful, like you're just reporting feedback to a co-worker on something they're making for you.
Hm okay
Regardless of IRL or in an online playtest. All you have to do to give good constructive feedback, is explain to the best of your ability what it is you like or dont like...then the reason why.
AKA, dont just say you dont like something, explain why. Giving examples using other games can help. But you should always give a reason why.
''I don't think 3D spotting exists because it destroys flanking, rewards camping'' this is a good feedback right?
Why or how does it destroy flanking, and how does it encourage camping?
You didnt give reasons, you just made a statement
Does anyone else have a Battlefield Playtest that says "Register your interest"? Not sure why it says that
Says the same for me
Some sniper from 300 meters away spots players who tries to flank flags from sides so they get shot
Yeah and tapping it just takes me to a congratulations page
BFV had it perfect, you could 3D spot as a sniper only if you either shot the enemy or you used binoculars
Thats part of a recons job. 👌
Well yeah but see
where?
I went from "scheduled playtest" Playtest happening to "Your Playtests" and an empty page
So you can only be selected for the first playtest if you live in USA, Canada, uk or Sweden? I was honest and selected that I am not from any of those 4 countries and got booted out of the playtest signup. Kinda bummed about it because this is a remote session and would have loved to test it thoroughly
Playtests in progress
nope, both playtests available and scheduled are empty for me
interesting
Yeah weird
It doesn't actually let me do anything though
When I tap on it, I simply go to a congratulations page and the Playtest stays there
well, congratulations then
I'm so confused but I'll just leave it
BF2043
BF 2042 - 2 Electric boogaloo
Battlefield Not so Hard - Line 2042

Battlefield Reddit
Battlefield 420 69
@dire ice Battlefield: Ping
Battlefield Heroes sequel: Battlefield Villains
I have not heard that the next Battlefield is called Battlefield: Vietnam 2042 - Hard Heroes
Battlfield: Balls 2042 - Balls
I was just thinking about battlefield heroes over the last few days. It was a good game. It was ahead of its time.
I really liked battlefield heros too lol
Battlefield Fortress 2
ClashPasture.
They should bring it back. It was basically what Fortnite ended up doing except not a br.
Both Heroes and Battlelog was ahead of their time. Grumpy Battlefield fans didn't really feel them though.
You must be miserable
That is certaintly an opinion one can have, and BC2 was great!
But i've had fun in BF3, BF4, Hardline, 1 & the very occasional fun in 5.
Battle Runner 2049
Bf3? Bf4? Bf1? Bfv and 2042 are also fun to an extent
?
Oh nevermind
They just added IFVs last week
If you could choose couple maps to return to new battlefield, which ones would it be?
(Granted they shouldve been in at launch but)
I would take Damavan Peak, Grand Bazaar and Karkand
Id be fine with any of the base bf3 maps. Peak imo
oh, and one thing I wish to return is vehicle entry and exit animations, like bf3
it is something so small yet so cool that we lost with the time
I don't want more planes spawning on air, I want to take off
Bf3 had animations?
Not sure if animations, but at least, air vehicles would not spawn on air
I remember having to go to the airfield to pick the jet and take off
There is many who loves that, but also the other games and thats awesome 😄
Pretty sure animations came in one and stayed till 5, but yeah i miss jets starting on the ground. Made it easy for people to kill you before getting airborn though and players stealing enemy aircraft
I know BF1 and BFV did this. When I got into those games coming out of BF4 I didn't like the animations for getting into and out of tanks, but it really does add a lot in the value of keeping the vehicle alive since panicky exits won't work lol
How do yall feel about the vehicle resupply mechanic from V?
Out. That is one of the things that I actually want to keep arcadey
With or without it I don't mind
I found it kind of fun personally. I really enjoyed the overall feelings of vehicles in V, they felt weighty
Metro 2025
Wake island, metro, karkand, road to jalalabad, the one from bf3 that you could airdrop an ifv, paracel storm, gulf of oman...
Battlefield 4's Operation Outbreak
Atacama Desert & Harvest Day
I’m a little mixed on it,
On one hand, it keeps things interesting, on the order is annoying.
I think keeping it to ground vehicle only could be better to prevent camping.
What are your expectations from the game battlefield 6?
Dice shutting down if it’s not good
I think they heard. From the short gameplay u can see. Looks like battlefield 1 immersion is coming back

Presumably they are going to be using season again, so I hope for more weapons per season
What are your biggest issues that were NEVER addressed in BF2042?
For me:
- The scoreboard. They need to go back to a scoreboard that reflects everything we do to earn XP in the game.
- I know this is a small pet peeve, but when I’m fighting to take down a vehicle, and get killed by it, I want to know how damaged that vehicle is, not the health of the driver! Small thing but it drives me crazy!!!
battlefield 1 is a great game
I'm here for it
I liked it, it stopped a lot of camping issues and made you think a bit before entering combat.
Positive but also skeptic how the game is going to be. I need to know more but so far, slightly confident that it may be a better experience in the last game.
What do you think of a possible release in early 2026?
How much do you think battlefield 6 standard edition will cost in dollars?
possible, i mean if gta 6 is coming out in 2025 then for sure lol
Unlikely this year with GTA planned to come out, Spring 2026 is a realistic frame
Was the Commander feature ever discussed in being brought back at all?
Probably $70? Was 2042 $70?
Idk I bought the $100 version of 2042
I'll say 79.99 USD
Depending on the progress, I hope this year but if they had issues, I’ll be fine with it
Do you think the game will not repeat the problems of Battlefield 2042
We got a release date?
Please look up two inches lol
2026 maby
Ooo bet thanks man
who knows
Properly not the same way, BF4 BF1 BFV all of them had issue one way or other,but they cannot afford another release disaster, so will it be perfect,Hell no, but it has to be close enough.
More like a time frame it can release from april 1st of 2025 till april 1st of 2026
I saw a video saying the game could be pushed back to FY26
More time? fine by me
Not sure if I’m right but I remember hearing they gave up on 2042 earlier to work on this one
so maybe
As much as I want the bandaid to be ripped, delays are a good thing with development at this point
Give me all out destruction back, and vehicles that actually spawn on the map. Or just remaster bf3/4 and smash them together 😁
FY26 starts in October 2025.
I just want an inversive map
So FY26 means very little
Does anyone know if you can actually turn off blurred graphics on 2042 or is that just the industry standard nowadays? i have motion blur and dlss turned off
Not sure why you would turn DLSS off. On and set to quality or balanced makes the game look sharper
Unless you play at 1080p and havent swapped over to the new transformer model
I'm assuming we will get required specs if we get invited? Do we know when to expect those details?
I don’t remember either, but I think they had to scrap whatever they original plane for post loans content because they have to use the next year also to fix it. next
They are already shown in the FAQ
there were some specs on the website
oh, I didn't see that
Thank you sir!
WHAT PC SPECS ARE NEEDED TO RUN BATTLEFIELD LABS?
PC Minimum Specs:
CPU: Intel Core i5-8400 / AMD Ryzen 5 2600
GPU: Nvidia RTX 2060 / AMD Radeon RX 5600 XT 6GB
Memory: 16GB
Storage: Minimum 30GB
PC Recommended Specs:
CPU: Intel Core i7-10700 / AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
GPU: Nvidia RTX 3060Ti / AMD Radeon RX 6700-XT
Memory: 16GB
Storage: Minimum 30GB
wdym by new transformer model? im not familiar with that stuff
The nvidia app supports DLSS model overriding now. You can set any game to use preset J, which is the new DLSS 4 transformer model. It looks a lot better
Ok, i'll look into that thx
my GTX 1080 Ti has been rocking for years, it's the end of an era I guess 😩
TLDR for DLSS preset changing
30 series card here u come
Will there be a dedicated area will can give feedback ??
No one knows yet
Awwww it's all very exciting !! Be nice to see a good battlefield game again !! I've had too much spare time lately lol
Why only 30GB? Will it be without multiplayer?
Thanks
A optimist good to see one
I wanted to ask who has the computer specifications?
uhm how do i get an email for the invitation if i didnt have to give up my email?
And I just commented on his optimism
if your ea account has the email in your info then you're good
i think so
yes but i have 2 ea accounts. how do i know which one it took
the one that you used to sign in i'd guess
The one that got the email
thats the thing i didnt sign in lol. i am logged in to one of my accounts now but idk if it took that one
oh then idk lool
With the amount of interest for the playtest, DICE should just make it an open alpha for a month. Close the alpha, make changes and then open another alpha. It's gonna be a miniscule chance that'll any of us get invited.
true
Is something I was going to ask
People keep mentioning receiving a email after registering is it to confirm it
the only email i've gotten was the announcment for the sign up. After i signed up, no email
Emails will be in a few weeks.
That's if you get in.
yeah ik
So you know then you won't get an email for a few weeks....🤦♂️
I know that, BUT people are saying it like, you register and then received a email confirming it
Yes you get an email from EAPlaytesting when you sign up for playtesting
Na, there are no sign-up confirmation emails, and no one has received any playtest invite yet.
I know I know, I am just confused about the whole email receiving thing people keep mentioning
Guys your account that is link when you applied that email is what they use to send the invite .
Invites what be coming out till probably march they had around probably around 500k sign up or less that amount is huge when trying to work to send invites I know everyone like where’s the invite be calm relax 😌
Playtests start in the coming weeks, according to official messaging. I doubt they want to wait a long time to begin the process of onboarding players.
#battlefield-labs-news message
Remember, the sign-up order doesn’t affect the order of invites for the initial tests starting in the coming weeks.
nice virus
another one 
its a good one, no joke
False
🤷♂️ your loss 😄
IP Grabber (2)
true
Will there be assignments like BF3 and bring back DLC instead of battlepasses
People are playing already apparently
Is it worth buyig Hardline on PC?
the campaign is nice
Huh? First I heard of this
after signing up for the playtest on EA site is there anything else that I need to do or I just wait for the email
wait for potential mail
just have to wait
Considering that this game is slated to release before Q2 2026, it's probably already close to being done. Playtest is likely for networking/gameplay refinements, similar to what BF4 CTE resulted in.
was hoping for that
A flask of bees that make pizza is cooking something
From my analysis, the core issues of 2042 came from the new capability of 128 players. After the beta, they had to rework a ton of their server code, which they were also doing during the early access period and the first few weeks of the game. This pushed back the development of other key features like VOIP, text chat, and the comms menu.
128 players increased server stresses to the point that destruction had to be toned down to maintain environment synchronization as well.
From the looks of this game, they are bringing the destruction back to be closer to BFV. Whether that means no 128 players or just designing for 64 and then letting the 128 player chaos gremlins run around in pure chaos, or if they've managed to significantly improve their server performance, I don't know
Unfortunately it wasn't a pizza for everyone. Sorry
BF6 has been confirmed to not have 128 player servers 
Yeah, makes perfect sense. That was definitely their largest pain point in 2042. Hope they still let us spin up chaos gremlin servers tho
in Portal
I’d like to see EA make portal based around like 2042 and the WW1-2-Bad Company battlefields
doesn’t make much sense to try to be a successor to BF3-4 and have BF3 in the portal
Aside from preset and I guess maybe weapons, does it really make sense to have Bad Company and BF3 separate in a portal context?
Like 90% of the weapons in BC were in BF3 anyway
The game I most want to see in portal is actually 2142
They are not
If anyone in the community says they are, they are trolling
classic
I trust you, not because you're on the team, but because you advocate pineapple on pizza.
Pineapple on pizza with bacon is incredible (with ranch)
I hope they get rid of Portal. All Portal seems to exist for is to create XP farming lobbies upon release and once the patch that out the space becomes a place of 1,000 custom experiences mostly created by poor helicopter pilots and tank drivers who ban rockets and players who get tired of getting sniped so they ban those as well. It fractures the player pool and keeps with the ridiculous narrative of "Let the children do whatever they want." instead of cultivating a community and experience.
I hope portals return is for the portal builder and hosting tools only. Any past games maps, weapons, vehicles or factions should be incorporated into the same systems as the main core factions.
No more weird era mish-mash like we had in 2042. Where you could use one era, but not the gear of that era with another era/faction.
Terrible idea. They need to rebuild trust and stay away from a space where they could end competing with CoD or GTA 6 for players and dollars. If this isn't a hit right away, the series may not ever recover.
The only news we have on a release date is FY26. So anytime after september really
Also, thats uhhh, thats an interesting username you got there
Dude never played Afghan War Sim, any of the hardcore experiences, any of the zombie modes, or SquidG's RushXL
You should honestly try mine.
Chicken, pineapple, jalapeño. Delicious.
Andrew Wilson already floated delaying the game to early 2026 to avoid the launch of GTA 6 and DOOM The Dark Ages
Notice how I said unless GTA 6 is close
EA has already said they'd be willing to move the release date if GTA 6 is too close
Ooooo, I'll order that tonight
It's my new go-to pizza.
You might have said that elsewhere, it was not in the remark I replied to. 🤷
It's right below it my man
The full quote from EA CEO Andrew Wilson when asked about the release and all the competition towards the end of the year:
“I do believe that this year might be a nuanced year relative to competition. There may be some things happening in the year that may cause us to think differently about our launch timing. We have an FY 26 launch window that the team is targeting. We believe the game will be great and ready at that time, but if we got close to that timeframe and believed that this wasn't going to be a great window for us, then we would take a look at what an alternate window might be that would give us the appropriate time, energy, and player acquisition opportunity for this Battlefield to be all that it needed to be.”
You were so close to perfection. And you just HAD to add pineapple.
Got this from an IGN article about this if you'd like to see all the corpo talk leading up to and after the block quote
Okay.. you lost me at ranch
Pineapple is best. Sorry, not sorry.
Ranch with pineapple pizza is genuinely great
pineapple bacon ham with ranch dip is so good
Nah, blue cheese is for wings, ranch is for salad
Blue cheese 🤮
Everyone argues about the validity of pineapple on pizza, but Blue Cheese being better then ranch is a hill I'll die on
Same. Grossssss
I actually kind of hope GTA VI get delayed just a bit
I don't have a console and I'd much prefer a new Battlefield
Here in Sweden we have an abomination called
"Banana and curry pizza"
hit markers are too arcade for the old playerbase nowdays. We also need the option to load non tracer rounds on the mags. Also, please bring it as close as possible to the real physics when it comes to bullet and rocket speeds
So subsonic ammo of 2042
Never heard of this 2042 game
The thing with adding ammo without tracers, is that you have to make it worse in one way (damage, velocity, ammo count) versus standard ammo with tracers. Players will generally not want that downside as a trade off, and as we saw in 2042...neglect to use it versus alternatives
It is funny when you shoot someone and they don't know where it's coming from
They freak out every time
So yall don't like the subsonic ammo? Because I LOVE THAT ISHHHHHH
I dont, because 99% of players are too bad to notice hit direction/tracers, or are dead already when I shoot them using a standard extended mag
it doesnt have to be a downgrade if its the standard ammo
Smh it's very useful when flanking. Idc for silencers
Then why would anyone use the standard ammo? youve just made a part of your game irrelivant
Subsonic ammo + suppressor is the shit
imagine showing up on the minimap

i want to be revealed on minimap so they come my way and i can mow them down with mah bipod mmg
Never tried it tbh just subsonic and my Avancys or other LMG/AR
What I'd like is more realism such as. Blood spatter and limbs flying off 😈
I want more variety in aircraft for each faction
My primary loadout on my Ak5C is subsonic ammo, suppressor, red dot, and underslung shotgun
then I always have AP/High Power (don't remember what it exactly is), 5X scope, long barrel, bipod as a backup via the plus menu to get snipers
I just hope we get to see a NATO faction with subfactions which would determine different uniforms and voicelines like in MOH:W (though, different subfactions for the other larger faction)
That ak5c is a beast. Not a bad loadout. Been a while since I've used it. Think I've been using the latest AR they added I forget the name rn.
It just occured to me that (correct me if Im wrong) but there hasnt been an F-22 in a BF game and thats a crime
ak5c was the last ar added no? regardless pair ak5c with supressor and sub ammo and you will a god
f35s and f15s mostly i think
Too OP IRL lol
imo the next bf needs to be a turn to the tactical side, slightly more fast paced and arcadish than SQUAD. I feel like we cant even enjoy a game that goes as fast as even bf4 anymore. Personally, I'm done with the run n gun feelings of those old games, especially that combined with hit markers and slow "time to kill". I'd like a game that takes advantage of the engine we are used of, that balances physicality with easiness, while also reducing that time to kill, so that good timing and calculated engagements actually reward the player who starts them and is able to think and aim fast.
i mentioned this yesterday. if they do a battlepass there should only be 2 factions in the game, Nato vs Csto. after that they can make every season focus on a new sub faction adding uniforms and weapons from those militaries. for example season 1 would add british weapons, cosmetics, and vehicles and season 2 would have something like chinese themed gear and so on. this way you can use all of those cosmetics in both of those 2 factions, and it would make sense
You can take a look on squad or reforger playerbase
Insurgency with destruction and vehicles would suit me
In my opinion, Ctrl C Battlefield 3, Ctrl V Battlefield 6
Yeah those games have a small playerbase
Starting off with the US, UK, France, Germany, Poland and Spain (I picked the larger countries because I'm lazy), and then adding for example central euopean subfactions in season 1, nordic subfactions in season 2, south european subfactions in season 3 etc, would be totally ok for me
Squad is alive since 2015 without any competitive aspects, with tens or hundreds of servers constantly being filled with up to 40 peaple waiting on ques
I first thought you said "tens or hundreds of thousands of servers" and i was like what are ya smoking my brother
also, the arcade shooter genre is saturated and I feel like most bf veterans just have too much nostalgia around it. Im not saying to copy squad. Just reduce the time to kill and remove those hit markers..
You play hardcore for that
See i feel like they should do US, China, Russia, and UK to start and then add North Korea, France, Germany, Iran, and other nations throughout the seasons. it would be way cooler if it were themed around countries imo
Oh the ones I mentioned were just subfactions as part of the one NATO faction
Dont do China at all, so game doesnt get banned for a few billion players.
yeah thats what im thinking too, but we will probably only be guaranteed one year of content so id probably expect 2 nations for each side getting new stuff added to start. you dont want it stacked to heavy on one side so they would need to have countries like iran or north korea added in that first year
2042 got longer than a year of support
Yup, 2 years of content (3 seasons extra that were in general longer than the first 4 seasons individually)
Dfr strife was the lmg I was referring to had to fire the game up to recall it lmao. M5a3 one of my faves for sure as well. Going to mod and try the ak5c as mentioned
right, but battlefield 5 did not. It all comes down to how the game performs at launch and during year one. 2042 they had to add more stuff because if they didnt it would tank their rep further
I honestly want the good ol' paid expansions back
Expansions haven't been as good as they were when those existed
i would too, but i dont want maps split up dividing the player base, and i also dont want it to be pay to win
BF3 and BF4 did it amazingly
2042 couldnt afford to end support sooner than it did. Otherwise no one would have faith in the next games live service.
Had it been terminated after season 4/5...that would have been 2 games in a row. Further tarnishing the franchises ability to support a live service
Doing paid expansions when your competition isn't seems like a really bad idea
idk abt that. lots of maps are hard to find matches in later in the life spand because not everyone bought them. maybe if they did paid map packs, and then released them for free after a year or something
so year one would be free when year two starts etc
bf4's premium cost double the ammount of the main game. You cant be anything but super nostalgic for saying that kind of stuff
Yeah but during the games first couple of years those maps are populated af
Expensive ≠ not good
sure, but ngl if this game turns out to be as good as i hope it will i would rather have long term support over the span of 3-4 years rather than another game
Premium at least guaranteed X DLCs, each with Y content. Live service of the past 2 games was so up in the air and unknown
EA won't hire you for licking their boots that way..
Granted the stuff cost money, but the content you got in return was awesome and added hundreds of hours of additional fun to an already amazing game
Well we do know the plan they had for 2042
And you certainly won't get a medal for having a different opinion than me lol
It's unfortunate that they couldn't follow it
ngl i would be content with a bf4 remaster with more new weapons, maps, and another year of support
agreed, i think they shoulod try and do something similar to R6 siege with how they release content. game has had years of continued support and new content. The hard part is finding a balance
BF3 was more legendary for me but I'll take anything similar to the two esp if boats are a thing. It would really be nice to bring back commander mode and have some ships dropping cruise missiles and ish
Same, Bf3 has a special place in my heart
I wish I could see how many hours I have on that game
Met lots of great people on there
Since bf1, EA's direction for the game was clear. Launch, harvest, repeat. Video games industry was expanding crazy fast since fortnite's and pubg's release and that's exactly why they only focused on the arcade side of it. What they need to do to compete in modern times is to build the community around seasons and big esports events, exactly what big and timeless titles have been doing for decades now (league, dota, r6s). Since they want the new battlefield to be kind of a hub, they need to build around a main event in which preferably the whole community can compete for a place in it.
I think you still can at battlelog.battlefield.com/bf3
The studios would never abandon esports the way EA forced dice to do since bf1 and it was clear how they forced this change in direction mid BF1. the game was about to launch tournaments in ESL and dice suddenly decided that those 25million just wanted to compete for some KD
I don't remember my password, it was back on the PS3 
Ahh, they are still there! Wow, what a difference weekly missions do for me. 160 Hours ( not a ton in BF3).. almost 500 on 2042. But in BF2.. 1200 that was my jam.
The competitive scene for battlefield has always been basically nonexistent
They could bring back squad rush for that
I still have my Ps3 physical editions for BFBC2, BF3 and BF4
BF4 ESL was giving away even 200k at some point. BF1 could be huge if they wanted to. But if you take a look at the industry back then, you can clearly see the numbers of young teens being the "cows waiting to be farmed".
Similar here.. BF has always been my favorite franchise. I still have my boxes for BF:Vietnam, BF:2, BF:2 Special Forces and BF:2142. The rest are digital now
BF 2 
Also, teams like PENTA who won R6S multiple times were playing on community cups and leagues back then. There were big teams waiting for something to happen, but marketing teams had different plans. The whole EA direction was very clear back then
I unfortunately stopped after BF4 when Hardline came out. I came back later though and I've caught up and played a lot of the recent games
But man, I really miss the old BF3 days
I remember watching those troll videos on BF3
Thats hella survivor bias. EA has made and released so many games and then dropped support for them chasing trends from the MMO trend (Warhammer AoR), to the MOBA trend (Dawngate), and most recently battle royale (BFV Firestorm). And many of the failed games tried to force an esport scene.
Specifically from that one guy, I don't remember his name
Coming from the original few in the series.. I really really liked the weekly missions / season format in 2042. I do hope that comes to BF:6
I guess 4 had that, but I didn't really buy into that format.. just played my old way
I think it might have been too long for me, I don't recall those.. but I'm sure I've watched them. 8)
Brah, EA was just always chasing trends since bf1 trynna get some piece of the pie of those newcomers from gen fortnite. Nothing original in their moves and clearly everything was showing that DICE no longer had a saying on those strategies
Found him, he's called grandmasterauto on YT, videos were always called "trolling dem noobs"
Thats the point im making. EA trying to force battlefield and other IP's to follow the current popular trend is what led so many of these games to fail. And correct me if im wrong but your advocating that they do something similar by changing the core gameplay loop that made previous successful battlefields work to something they're not. I can agree with tweaking the average time to kill and such but to make it more in like with those more hard core tactical shooters I don't believe is it.
Haha.. man.. i miss playing BF3... so much fun with C4. Good times!
Honestly, I just feel like battlefield has to feel like real life in the movement, but with soldiers having unlimited stamina. And the engine did great on depicting this feeling. It just needs some tweaks, cause it has become too arcade and this market just feels oversaturated nowadays. In no way did I mean something that feels like squad, just something that's more towards this direction rather than towards COD
Also, yes. Its obvious that EA had stakeholders that only minded short term winnings. FIFA was all they needed and everything else was just a way for them to build hype for their shares to go up short term so that they can play their financial games
Oh for sure man, I remember being able to launch the buggys and ATVs across the map with C4
Authenticity over realism
Sometimes even tanks
But not too arcade like cod
All the late night weekends spent playing BF3 
We need it back man
Community servers as well
Let communities form around the game
Ah ok I gotchu then! I havnt played squad yet myself but I was always under the impression its similar to ARMA and much more a realism like game. I've always been partial to more of an arcade/fun over realism which is why I dont play on hardcore servers.
We need community servers and ModSDK's back like in BF2
bf 2024 was just their try to catch up to the modern warfare trend, and there you can see how all they minded about was to find a way to get their portion of those young teens finally reaching the point of playing games like that. Most people dont actually know the numbers we are talking about when we speak about this new gen of gamers that came after fortnine, pubg and covid
So many fantastic total conversion mods and player made maps back before Bad Company
Definitely
The worst part is most of those things in older BF games (Vehicle launching, C4 jeeps, C4 drones, MAV riding) were accidental possibilities, but made the games fun.
If most of these were a thing in a modern BF game...the vocal parts of the community would cry about it until removed. (See Hovercraft building climbing in 2042, C5 drones)
Wait they fixed Govercraft building climbing?!
Yeah, games have become too competitive
BOOOOOOOOOO
Back then it was all about the fun and the lolz
They fixed that real quick
People loved those ridiculous things
Yeah. A lot of games are doing that too. Because it's "too unfair."
"fast paced" and competetive for the masses. BF still has a unique market to bring competition in if it focuses on being original
The incessant need for meta chasing and competitive focus has made so many games become stale.
See Apex for example.
I remember discovering that reversing up mountains with the jeeps would make them go fast af, you'd sometimes fly over the mountain top and go down the other side lol
What weapons would you like to see in the Labs?
Bipod knife 
jng
Bring back BF3 audio mix
XM-8
Echoes bumped up to 100
Ngl, the hardline 1911 is the pinnacle of sound design
Jim is cooking
oh hey i finally no longer timed out
SCAR
What did ya do brother
Realistically when do you guys think the invites will go out
Watch out so the moderators don't strike ya down my burger friend
If one gets the message your time slot was at 0945PM does that mean one will no longer get to play Battlefield Labs?
I think I have fallen asleep before the end of queue or asleep during session timing due to Qeueu wait time and staying up during queue.
I sincerely hope there is still a way to play and contribute.
Side note:
I have been very unfortunate in the last decade / decade and a half.
Because of it I barely got to play the BF Series.
To which I dedicated my life as promised in my teens...it was the period of BF3 I got my first personal Gaming rig after saving for over a decade of holiday budgets.
Point I am getting at,
I did and gave néarly all I could to get 2042 and the teams involved the time, dedication and feedback it deserves for as far as I am capable nowadays despite incrementally and added disabilities and the challenges they bring.
Anyway, hoping to play and contribute every active day,
Greetings from a Player, former BF Server admin and overall contributor hoping to bring more of the public to the table of The Battlefield Series and it's development.
something that the community team said was fixed was not fixed 😂
next week or the week after that
I’m thinking Monday personally
First of all my man, the invites are random. There are not any special treatments
Second of all, the time which you finish registering does not affect your chances of being picked. And it's only a limited amount of players, not everyone gets invited
Ayy so mistakes, same same
I got timed out for sending the email address the playtesting mails will come from
yea they said they fixed that after i got timed out the first time
then last night i did it again and got timed out
Lmao classic EA amirite
Sorry for the long message, afraid I have missed my playtime window like during Gamescom 2016 @ EA Community Lounge.
deu to disabilities after saving up a decade of holiday budgets.

Thanks a lot for refreshing my memory!
Don't worry, the queue is only for registration. You still have time, if you missed your window just reenter the queue if it's not too long and then finish the survey
I hope commander mode is something that is brought back. If it has enough support of course
Battlefield 2 commanders were the shit
@old anchor true dat
Also what would be awesome is a controllable aircraft carrier where players can man different stations and even take off from the carrier just like battlefield 2 and even the very first battlefield 1942
And the other naval assets
Hi
Good thing sliding will be a thing in the next BF
Just better not be a BF1 slide 
has anyone gotten invited to the playtest yet?
No
I don’t think they could tell you even if they did
they said test will begin in the "Next weeks"
so... i dont any of us have the invite yet
not for a bit + NDA probably means people wont even be able to say so
or anything beyond "yeah im playing labs"
I think it’ll be next week personally
it said in the next few days
ehhh my bets are on saturday the 15th for the first wave
earliest
wait till after the holiday
Monday morning is my bet big dog
idk if i should share this but there are playtests surveys that mention playtests (doesnt specify the game) happening on the 18-20 of Feb. i feel like those days might be it guys
or not
idk


Thankfully its up to none of us who gets to give feedback. 👍
That's exactly the type of people they want, sorry to tell ya bud
I think a lot of people are in for a rude awakening when it comes to what they will actually be asking for playtests of and feedback on.
I'm guessing mostly surveys and few open text spots
I for one love writing out complete responses to questions and try to do so in a concise manner, but I can imagine some may just use those spaces to rant
People thinking its gonna be like an open alpha, when more likely it gonna be a closed session for 2 hours on a random Wednesday morning...where youre asked to run and jump over some blocks and give opinion on how it feels
plus, must be tough trying to read through 10s of thousands of written responses
I hope it’ll be on soon
My only hope is that they have more accessible times for us office 9-5 people lol
I'm gonna ask them to add controllable slide in every session if I'm selected 
Please God no slide
"Please keep feedback on topic, or you will be removed from the session"
Have fun with unsolicited feedback in a closed playtest haha
That's on the topic if they ask how it feels though, like jumping over blocks or running
Im gonna give feedback, but then also still ask for a Battlefield C&C game lol
Yeah no lol
Id hope they wont put up with people trying to derail tests, and provide feedback they dont yet want
"Jumping over the block feels nice, but it would be better if I could slide"
Okay sir.. what about flying the helicopter?
"Feels great but would be better if it could slide"
Its a helicopter sir that doesn't make sen..
"it would be better if it could slide"
"Player has been kicked from the playtesting program"
They probably wont be that strict...but im sure there will be people who just wont give a shit and not do anythign they are asked haha.
i've seen like 10 people say they've been in the latest skate playtest
Kicked from it you mean?
Constructive feedback has done a lot troughout the History of Battlefield Series.
I hope they bring back the only in battlefield clips
Not what closed focused playtests are for tho. they are, and likely will be for a very specific feature
Probably 80% or more of people signing up are thinking "I wonder how many maps will be in the test". when there probably wont be anything like that up for testing.
I think there will
They said themselves they're far into development
Im sure there will be tests focusing on both specific features and general gameplay
Pre alpha, so they are looking to get feedback on mechanics and feeling, not maps
Pre-alpha can still be far into a very playable state
Finished? No. But definitely playable on a bigger scale
Likely potential that has, After all Folks wanted the teams to focus and make a difference...
Let's do it together and bring them all the intel we can get them from public and personal perspectives.
Sure, by definition its a non feature complete version of the game
Yay I'm back
BF1 slide is the best!
Didnt BF1 have like...5 different versions of sliding tho?
I hate sliding
it went through a lot
now has the most pointless one imaginable
IMO, sliding should be a skill for a quick entry to low cover. not a way to exploit movement to get an upper hand in combat
if it was replaced by something else like air strafe I wouldn't mind if it got removed
there just needs to be a little something, and sliding into bhop is all 2042 has
Many.. many..
Sliding shouldn't be something that can be exploited, or something to get into combat. it should be something to get you out of combat, into cover, not an abuseable mechanic! Personally, i don't want a strong slide.
Yeah, basically dont allow shooting while sliding, so people cant SMG dive at opponents and through doors
Just anything to make it so gunfights are actually an exchange and not just a who sees who
seeing someone do a strafe jump in bf4 piques my interest cause I know I need to be alert to out aim him, that sort of stuff I love
And for the love of god...get rid of doritio shooting
isnt there a text somewhere that states they will first be testing conquest and such. i believe i saw something like it
get rith of all cod movement and implement bfv movement
I saw a short on YT earlier of DF...and it just shows me how poor FPS games visibility has become
that much I can agree with
the lights on people in 2042 was fantastic, hope that continues
This gun is absolutely insane.
Aug AR build code : AUG Assault Rifle-Warfare-6F72S0O0AV05RJB29VF29
FPS games these days in a nutshell
No doritios at all when ADS please!
delta force is literally just bf2042. people praising it are crazy to me. we shouldnt want battefield to look anything like it. i miss the days i competed with my clan in bf3 against other clans in a tournement that was fun.
As I famously saw someone say about DF on Twitter. "Creativity is free".
I hate it to no end when those icons appear through particles and smoke
Their extraction part is decent. But the BF clone part is half baked AF
like, I don't want people to just blend in with foliage and not be seen at all, but also not smoke wallhacks
Id prefer let them blend in than have a dorito
with the backpack and body lights it should be a best of both worlds
I like when you can blend in

Not a ridiculous amount but just enough to where people don't immediately spot someone unless they look closer
Crouching when sprinting, and just completely stopping feels like shit tho. A slide where you cant shoot is fine
The old battlefields had animations where your character would slide on their feet a bit like you would when stopping quickly from a run in real life
Not some dumbass slide on their ass though
I quite liked crouch sprinting in BF5, but shooting while slide shouldn't be a thing
Oooooooooooor no ass slide at all
Yeah, just a small continuation of velocity
I like it when there are Game mechanics that i have to master and the Movement actually feels fluid
Should still be slight. It's possible but not like a baseball slide! Think of all the gear you have on you!
i feel sliding is fine as long as it doesnt turn the game into a reaction shooter kind of thing
Should be a small slide on your feet or a stumble
As long as it's not sliding and shooting and you can't spam it fine with me
In 4 it's very slight! Caught a few idiots with her pants down doing it!🤣
In 4 you can clip your hitbox into the floor while flying around at mach 5
bf4 also had that zuzou jump that was glitchy as hell lol
That's what their fixing in this Next one hopefully!👌
Sliding should have a cooldown and jumping should reset momentum to run/sprint speed
Gimme a operation metro remastered pls thank you

Idk about a cool down for slide but you do need one for running for sure!
Ew
Stops slide cancelling cod shenanigans
COD jumping omnidirectional bullshit
BFV had great movement including omnidirectional prone. I really miss that in 2042 and when I go back to bf4
The most slide should be at 2 foot max! Just enough to go through or by a door way!
that's not even a meter 
all that does it make you stuck in the mud and shot instead
I hope sliding is overpowered af
Nah, go play CoD
V was an arcade shooter just like 2042. We're clearly not after that in this next one!
Not with that SBMM
Shame that a slide can be seen in the pre alpha trailer they showed off 
Was crouch sprint speed in bf5 the same as regular spring speed? It seemed liked that to me.


