#James Webb Space Telescope đ
1 messages ¡ Page 3 of 1
And not even the guys on the Arch forums could fix my stuttering problem, so I'm probably gonna jump to an AMD card. I'm so tired of stuttering and tearing.

fat fingers the burn
as long as they dont accidentally trigger a stage like people tend to do in KSP
Reddit on how they park Webb at the right spot:
So it's a game of space-curling
Pretty accurate, lol
except it's mathematical space curling :)
thats a pretty good analogy yeah, since you can only add speed
for posterity
link o that website?
'WhereIsWebb' shows the status of Webb on its journey to L2 orbit. The page constantly updates as Webb travels, deploys, and cools to operating temperature. The most recently completed deployment step for Webb is displayed along a timeline that also indicates the major deployment phases. Note that the timing, duration and/or order of deployme...
41 km and counting
pinned in here for weeks :D
10 km!!
4 miles!
5km!!!!
its there 
I think the site just got effectively DDOSed
lul
Batman?
yes
will apparently be live in 42 minutes
oh yeah, the hot side is moving at 54 c, gotta go fast
Watman
cold side is going at -211c! its pulling the satellite apart!
I'm giving 'er all she's got, cap'n!
so, we have good orbital insertion and no failed unfolding actions
Webb is knocking it out of the park so far
all according to plan
âWebb, welcome home!â said NASA Administrator Bill Nelson. âCongratulations to the team for all of their hard work ensuring Webbâs safe arrival at L2 today. Weâre one step closer to uncovering the mysteries of the universe. And I canât wait to see Webbâs first new views of the universe this summer!â
the most BORING statement ever
boring is good, very good
"Webb, welcome home! It's been a perilous journey. You may have lost a few screws along the way, and your heat shield is literally hanging on with beeswax and masking tape, but you made it. Congratulations!"
There, made it more exciting for ya. :P
hey, that's why there's multiple screws :p
1. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/01/24/orbital-insertion-burn-a-success-webb-arrives-at-l2/
2. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/01/21/webbs-journey-to-l2-is-nearly-complete/
3. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/01/19/webb-mirror-segment-deployments-complete/
4. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/01/13/mirror-mirroron-its-way/
5. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/01/12/webb-begins-its-months-long-mirror-alignment/
6. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/01/10/following-the-next-steps-in-webbs-journey/
7. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/01/08/primary-mirror-wings-deployed-all-major-deployments-complete/
8. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/01/08/starboard-primary-mirror-wing-deployment-underway/
9. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/01/07/first-of-two-primary-mirror-wings-unfolds/
10. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/01/07/primary-mirror-deployment-has-begun/
there we go
migrated to a fresh arch install
I seem to be getting a bit familiar with systemd these days...
quick! post everything we've written within the next two minutes or so to cause chaos!
webb didn't have an ion engine, did it? I wonder why..
2008 technology probably :P
that's part of it yeah
ion engines were experimental when the thruster design was locked in
also, ion engines have low delta-v. and, webb's orbit is exponentially unstable so its important to have a big delta v buffer in case you miss an orbital correction, you'll need more and more delta v in order to correct
mmh.. "behind" its time in some ways yeah
maybe they figured they already have the hydrazine for the main engine, might as well reuse the same fuel for the thrusters too
what i mean by that is if you get a little bit out of orbit, it doesnt take much to get you back in. ion engines could do that no problem. if you get a little more out of alignment, suddenly it takes a lot of thrust to stabilize. your ions are straining a lot. just a tiny bit more and you're doomed. you'll need more thrust than the ion engines can deliver to move back into orbit
i didnt know this beforehand, this is based on the 2nd answer here
https://space.stackexchange.com/questions/57255/why-doesnt-jwst-use-ion-thrusters
since there's a risk of slipping out of orbit, its safer to use high thrust engines
Delta-V is not the same as thrust though
you're right. i should have delta-v/second

"acceleration"
I think that's called acceleration
you're right. i should have said acceleration
plus it's potentially refuelable anyway
or so I've heard
that would likely be an easy â˘ď¸ mission that, given the current projected lifespan of the project, could probably start development ten years from now
if they start right now, JWST might still be near L2
maybe in a decade we can just send a Starship repair team
where'd you hear that?
for a telescope for science funded through tax dollars it's a bit unfortunate we're left in the dark about if there or if there is not a refueling port
neat!
Ppl make a big deal about the short service life of JWST but NASA uses the Scotty method of giving estimates. Always under-promise.
IIRC they said the launch was flawless so we can expect ~20 yrs of service instead of the originally very conservative estimate of 10
It was given enough fuel for 10 years, so that's the minimum service life (barring unforseen circumstances), but NASA/ESA will use the telescope for as long as they physically can
I thought they were only going to guarantee 5 years (before launch)
But since they ended up needing less fuel than anticipated to get to course correct to L2, they can reuse that for about 10 more years of stationkeeping (advantage of using hydrazine thrusters I guess)
Guarantee 5, plan for 10, act pleasantly surprised when you get 20
đ
lets not get too excited here, we still havent even got 1 year of operation out of it
The most nerve wracking part is done tho
no celebrating til we get pictures
đž
i agree that the nerve wracking part is done. but i dont think we should be expecting 20 years out of it quite yet! i dont think nasa has said that they expect 20 years. i do know they said they might have 20 years of fuel, but that's a lot different than saying that they expect 20 years of operation.
remember, hubble had a mirror flaw that wasnt detected until they actually started taking pictures
they had to send out a (manned) repair mission, which is simply not possible for the jwst
ill volunteer to fix it
fortunately, this time the mirror is segmented
they did do a test of the optics on the ground though
also, that's not the sort of mistake one makes twice, lol
also robots could potentially fix a mistake if they want to send out a small "low" budget mission with no return
there's probably a whole section of the testing procedure devoted to not "repeating Hubble"
99 bugs on the wall, take one down, patch it around, 99000 bugs on the wall
yes but there is a huge class of unknown potential failure modes out there
shouldn't that be 101376 bugs? đ
potentially 101375 (if the original bug was actually fixed)
or maybe just 100352
I'm sticking with enjoying cautious optimism, mindful of the fact that it could go wrong, but genuinely hopeful with recognition of it being utterly and blissfully out of my control
because they tested in atmosphere?
(except they also tested in vacuum so that's not it)
same! which is why i think the "expect 20 years" is far too optimistic!
Hope for 20, expect 2
Calc said act pleasantly surprised and I can see how that sounds like expecting 20 so I see where you arr coming from now :P
And apparently my phone thinks I should speak like a pirate
was talking about 86, who said we can expect 20 years
Ahh
With another telescope
But how did they take that picture?
With another telescope
but I want a picture of the telescope that took a picture of the telescope
telescopes all the way down
click the tiny pic embed
now i want a picture of the camera that took a picture of this telescope that took a picture of the other telescope
(apologies for the shitpostery, lets go back on topic)
turning off heaters to begin a long cooldown process
Despite the lack of humidity and indeed an atmosphere as a whole, this still made me imagine Webb turning into one big snowflake, crystalizing outward
"Don't lick the telescope"
The heaters were necessary to keep critical optics warm to prevent the risk of water and ice condensation.
UH OH
you were right IC
I mean sure, during the launch/setup :P
Is it Operational?
^
In 6 months, pehaps. Currently testing & calibrating.
Ooh nice
Also Nice Star Trek Ship Iron
Is it the USS Enterprise?
or USS Discovery
I didn't search in a medium that would give me that info as conveniently as the gif itself
It's the JJ Abrams Enterprise
From the new movies
you can always recognize the Discovery by the separated ring in the saucer section
In its newest model yes
ah fair enough
(continuing the tangent a little)
I maintain that The Orville has a more complete grasp on the mantle of Start Trek then does Star Trek: Discovery
The Orville got a lot better when it moved on from the Family Guy humor (the first couple episodes are rough)
the Neelix vs EMH episode was good though
very cool
The images taken by Webb during this period will not be âprettyâ images like the new views of the universe Webb will unveil later this summer. They strictly serve the purpose of preparing the telescope for science.
show us the images!
this is a very interesting article! they go into the mirror alignment process
Just take any random pic of the night sky, then blur it until it is a single color :P
there are a few simulated images on what it might look like at each step
It was Phlox.
Also how's the telescope going? Last I heard, better than planned and lots of fuel
To work together as a single mirror, the telescopeâs 18 primary mirror segments need to match each other to a fraction of a wavelength of light â approximately 50 nanometers. uh
AFAIK still calibrating and shit
Yep
that's not so bad, actually; you can buy off-the-shelf picomotors with ~30 nm position resolution
Webb's mirror actuators are probably good to 10-20 nm, I'd guess
hmm, NASA materials say the alignment will be good to 1/10000 of a human hair (so ~2.5 nm)
so the actuators are probably good to at least ~1 nm position resolution, which is definitely some fancy tech (which also has to work at cryogenic temperatures, of course)
Each of the mirrors can be moved with incredibly fine precision, with adjustments as small as 10 nanometers
yeah
hmm, I guess overall alignment and mirror position resolution are slightly different things
I'll say that I win (with my estimate)! đ
Check back tomorrow for an exciting update about progress in the first weeks of Webbâs mirror alignment!
đ
obligatory: haha we don't have to check back tomorrow because we have the bot
Oops
Donât lick it ur tongue will get stuck
That's amazing
Prob would kill the cells on the tounge
This is going by so much quicker than I thought
Also learned about the micro actuators on the adjustable mirrors and their use of compliant mechanisms :>
Iz cool
okay no I can't share that and feel good
it's a joke
Space debris? At L2? Also yeah the link gives it away, I've seen (and clicked on) the same joke thing before haha
be glad I'm very sleepy at the moment
yeah lol, though the alttext or image isn't encoded in the URL interestingly
You used Embed ?
Tell me how you did it plz :D
I genuinely had a heart attack, you got me 
DS9 spoiler ||https://giphy.com/gifs/eXOVOJLkK6G7S||
Okay, the way this does coarse vs. fine is super cool. . . https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MxH1sfJLBQ
The cryogenic mirror actuators on JWST are amazing feats of engineering. Capable of long travel and nanometer precision, able to survive rocket launch, cryogenic temperatures and hard vacuum... they are really impressive devices. And they use flexures!
CONSIDER SUBSCRIBING đĽ°
âBuy me a coffee? https://www.buymeacoffee.com/Breakingtaps
đŹOr Patreo...
Thatâs what I was talking about @modest dune ;-;
So I get that the fine side is the shaft moving a notch which slightly moves the compliant part and the coarse is a screw, but I donât think I get how you move the coarse adjustment without it screwing with the fine adjustment
Or I guess that wouldnât matter? Iâm not sure I understand the fine adjustment enough
fine and coarse are different resolutions of the same dimension, so you always need to adjust fine after doing coarse anyway
cool video! an interesting comment on it from Robert Warden, who wrote the original paper designing the device:
I just wanted to say how impressed I am with your reverse engineering! Your graphics and description are very well done. Back then, we didn't have easy access to 3D printers, so I built the first model out of Legos, which is still on my desk! Wishing you all the best
LEGOS
what does "compliant" mean in that context?
ooh, boy -- somebody gets to learn something cool
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=97t7Xj_iBv0
Compliant mechanisms have lots of advantages over traditional devices. SimpliSafe is awesome security. It's really effective, easy to use, and the price is great. Check out SimpliSafe here: https://simplisafe.com/veritasium
I visited the Compliant Mechanisms Research group at Brigham Young University and spoke to Professor Larry Howell:
https:/...
into the queue it goes
id think "the part that moves or bends in response to a force." google gives this definition for compliant:
PHYSICSâ˘MEDICINE
having the property of compliance.
"the conversion of the gel to a much less compliant, rigid glass"
so it's bendy
another use is lung compliance -- the amount that lungs expand due to pressure. highly compliant lungs are like a plastic bag. lungs that are not compliant are like strong rubber
and supposed to be bendy
yep. utility through deformation (as in, changing shape) (though almost never designed as permanent deformation)
though this seems to be somewhat permanent
anesthesiologist need to pay attention to lung compliance when applying .... uhhh that throat tube thing that breathes for you
idk how often they'll recallabrate
intubation!
well, think of a paper clip. it's compliant for the job it does (holding papers together -- it bends a little and then back to its normal shape). but destructive deformation can also happen, where it won't return to its original shape (such as making a hanger out of it). I haven't watched it yet, but the video about the JWST mechanisms should make pretty clearâŚ
the video doesn't go into the warp control of the panel, just the linear actuators themselves
being a combination of coarse and fine adjustment, I'd be pretty sure that the compliant adjustment wouldn't be permanent in the mechanical property sense
yeah, not actually permanent just very... infrequently moved
yeah apparently the curvature of the mirrors are adjustable
yep, don't want a hubble repeat (well, and it's also convenient depending on what's being imaged)
ty for compliant parts vid
very cool
i wanna build one of these hexapod things now lol
They are one of today's lucky 10,000
http://sariel.pl/2009/09/gears-tutorial/ Didn't even need the video to recognize the gears, spacers, etc lol
grr (bushings) https://i.ebayimg.com/images/g/dL4AAOSw5alfRnSH/s-l300.jpg
Interesting, the coarse/fine coupling is actually two separate interlocking mechanisms. I wouldn't be surprised if the prototype was a bushing or two cut into shape.
Enhance!
i need photos! photos of galaxies!
Photos of Spider-Man!
Cool!
found a funny comment:
NASA: "Better or worse?"
Webb: "Better."
click
NASA: "Better or worse?"
Webb: "A little better, I think."
click
NASA: "How about now?"
Webb: "Ummm..."
NASA: "What is the farthest galaxy you can see?"
Webb: "I'm not seeing any galaxies."
NASA: ...
Webb: "I'm seeing before galaxies!"
NASA: 
wouldn't the only thing at that point be the CMB/CνB? :P
We donât know for sure!
Itâs actually a bit of a puzzle that we keep seeing galaxies earlier than expected
yes, that was the joke đ (also nice profile pic, lol)
so long as it doesn't start finding turtles
I think that would qualify as beyond-Standard Model physics đ
"That point" was specified as before galaxies, and I've bugged geo a fair bit with the hints that early galaxies look too contemporary at high redshift haha
But what if there isnât a âbefore galaxiesâ? :p
Eternal inflation
But how--.. hrm, been a while since I read about the different inflation model factors
I just think it would be amusing for a giant wrench to be thrown into ÎCDM and the universe is actually more static with the illusion of change
I wonder if an infinite universe with greater and greater time compression at earlier stages is distinguishable from eternal inflation
As per the ÎCDM model^
All the "That's funny..." things I've seen have made me intensely curious about the possibility of the observations attributed to inflation, dark energy, and even much of dark matter being the result of time compression (the inverse of what GR says that all mass/energy causes: space compression / time dilation) -- which would allow things like the cosmic coincidence of the equivalence of matter's density and dark energy's density being equivalent at our point on the timeline to be an invariant under a different model
-> Webb might see galaxies that appear to be so far away that they should be close to the big bang and thus young / small, but are actually more developed and not so different from our own, due to the way time compression being higher earlier on would affect the effective distance light would cover as the universe expanded
And then as per Maxreader's point about eternal inflation, I don't know if observing this ^ would be distinguishable from that
That makes my brain hurt lol
Webb should finally give us enough data to begin lopping off incorrect theories
zoo hypothesis turns out to be correct
the whole "everything expands faster than light-speed" thing? its like that to discourage building exploration vessels :P
joke's on them when humans stabilize our first wormhole đ
theres no grandfather paradox if all wormholes are fixed relative to some absolute perspective
yes, just need that universal reference frame
"JWST indicates evidence of, beyond all belief, pixels in the deep CMB"
"this just in, a giant crab thing floating in space appears to be pointing what looks like a gigantic telescope at us"
"The telescope appears to be heating up, maybe their cooling systems are failing"
"Oh no--"
"its quite a nice shade of red and looks to- did it just write out thanks for the compliment?"
..aren't crabs only red when cooked, just like lobsters?
its not like its in deep space
makes sense that the universe runs on Rust đ
This channel does a pretty good job of going over the most accepted model(s) of the universe to date https://www.youtube.com/c/HistoryoftheUniverse/videos
The entire history of the universe, one trillionth of a second at a time.
Business enquiries: historyoftheuniversechannel@gmail.com
hopefully, would be cool
a theory i'd love to see confirmed or denied are the primordial blackholes
but i dont think webb is designed to look for those
The Craziest thing about all this is that the fact the Universe may have been born several times and died over and over, and that life from those Universes (Which ours was born from) could have had life and possibly LOTS of life (Unlike ours, atleast from current knowledge)
Its also INSANE to think that we could be seeing a star and its planet who hosts intellegent life, but never will get to see them due to them not existing rn
we dont know ours is devoid of life
statistically speaking its not
we just havent found it yet
Yea
But i was reffering to Possibly so much life that if we were in those universes that we could see em next door
so to speak
And another thing is that if there is other intellegent life forms, they could be alot like us, Chemically and Biologically
we have one data point, unreasonable assumption
We are carbon based, they could also be carbon based
ye
We could also discover new Things, like maybe More about Black Holes, with James Webb
Would be interesting to learn how a reborn universe deal with entropy.
Entropy is statistical, not a completely hard rule
Surprised this hasn't been posted here yet https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Pu97IiO_yDI
Check out https://KiwiCo.com/Smarter30 to get 30% off your first month of ANY crate!
JWST Shirt: https://www.smartereveryday.com/store
Click here if you're interested in subscribing: http://bit.ly/Subscribe2SED
â Click below for more links! â
GET SMARTER SECTION
What's Webb doing right now?
https://jwst.nasa.gov/
...
it's aligned!

i need to ask, @noble quarry why đ¸ď¸ ?
"Webb" and đ¸ď¸
mostly it's because we have no specific emoji for Webb
it also works on multiple levels: Webb has a segmented primary mirror that is kind of like a spider web, and it also is "catching" photons đ
it's so sensitive, they didn't even mean to catch all galaxies in the background
ah ok cool lmao that flew over my head
Yeah thatâs wild
where does it say that?
caption on the aligned image
caption says they caught galaxies, not that it happened on accident
i guess the way i interpreted pinga's thing was that they unexpectedly captured the galaxies

they got photobombed by galaxies
as in, it was there, even without focusing on them, which is impressive
in general you just focus on infinity and you're good
claim a galaxy. i like the S looking one near the top left
I claim the one with earth in it, now pay me taxes
D:
Dude the JW deep view is gonna be wild
https://esahubble.org/images/archive/top100/ really cool images, cant wait to see what this new one will bring us!
oh no, it got archived!
permissions got messed up on a file
it's so cool how the optics shift gradually and they have to solve all that math to do the alignment iteratively... really shows how differential equations become relevant, and why I should've studied the physics class dependent on them rather than bulldozing into the abstract theory without clear purpose and dedication
the only reason it was visible was because gravitational lensing zoomed it in
they do say
Astronomers expect that Earendel will remain highly magnified for years to come. It will be observed by NASAâs James Webb Space Telescope. Webbâs high sensitivity to infrared light is needed to learn more about Earendel, because its light is stretched (redshifted) to longer infrared wavelengths due to the universeâs expansion.
âWith Webb we expect to confirm Earendel is indeed a star, as well as measure its brightness and temperature,â Coe said. These details will narrow down its type and stage in the stellar lifecycle. "We also expect to find the Sunrise Arc galaxy is lacking in heavy elements that form in subsequent generations of stars. This would suggest Earendel is a rare, massive metal-poor star,â Coe said.
Nice
1. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/04/01/webb-completes-first-multi-instrument-alignment/
2. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/03/24/webb-continues-multi-instrument-alignment/
3. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/03/17/webb-begins-multi-instrument-alignment/
4. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/03/10/webb-will-use-spectroscopy-to-study-composition-of-distant-galaxies/
5. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/03/03/checking-out-the-mechanisms-in-webbs-nirspec-instrument/
6. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/02/25/webb-mirror-alignment-continues-successfully/
7. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/02/24/to-find-the-first-galaxies-webb-pays-attention-to-detail-and-theory/
8. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/02/18/webb-team-brings-18-dots-of-starlight-into-hexagonal-formation/
9. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/02/17/webbs-fine-guidance-sensor-is-guiding/
10. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/02/11/photons-received-webb-sees-its-first-star-18-times/
(I ran it manually from my personal computer with an out-of-date sent links list)
@quaint plaza
oop sorry

Sorry for the accidental ping-a
you're fine
1. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/04/07/webbs-cool-view-on-how-stars-planets-form/
2. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/04/06/webbs-mid-infrared-instrument-cooldown-continues/
3. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/04/01/webb-completes-first-multi-instrument-alignment/
4. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/03/24/webb-continues-multi-instrument-alignment/
5. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/03/17/webb-begins-multi-instrument-alignment/
6. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/03/10/webb-will-use-spectroscopy-to-study-composition-of-distant-galaxies/
7. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/03/03/checking-out-the-mechanisms-in-webbs-nirspec-instrument/
8. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/02/25/webb-mirror-alignment-continues-successfully/
9. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/02/24/to-find-the-first-galaxies-webb-pays-attention-to-detail-and-theory/
10. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/02/18/webb-team-brings-18-dots-of-starlight-into-hexagonal-formation/
we cold now
this gave me shivers... why did this give me shivers
hehe
webb is now officially chilling in space
too cool for the rest of us
"we had some slightly conservative estimates"
Last week, the team passed a particularly challenging milestone called the âpinch point,â when the instrument goes from ridiculously cold to extremely ridiculously cold
classic NASA
They know how to manage expectations and I love it
Did it find anything yet?
commisioning is still underway; no scientific results are expected before the summer
Ahh ok :(
but! it's going really well so far, so we might well have some neat preliminary images before then
Wow
Is Webb at its final temperature? The answer is: almost!
chilly cool
Extremely cool 5.2 kelvins
Quantum computers: Am I a joke to you?
During commissioning, Webb is currently spending most of its time pointed at the ecliptic poles, which is a comparatively hot attitude. During science operations, starting this summer, the telescope will have a much more even distribution of pointings over the sky. The average thermal input to the warmest mirror segments is expected to go down a bit, and the mirrors will cool a bit more.
even cooler
how... cool 
I wonder when "this summer" we will start seeing full-resolution pics
strange, this keeps hiding despite not being archived
yeah
I guess it's an old thread now or something?
or maybe after some period of no interaction with the thread it hides?
Idk threads are super wonky sometimes
Yeah I got a thread in another server that should get auto archived after 30 days or whatever someone manually does it, but it just reappears a bit after
So everyone's just had to leave it and now it's permanently an "active" thread when you hover over the channel lol
Last someone spoke in there was like 3 months ago lol
webbhook should theoretically post once a week or so
awesome!
the team held a set of key decision meetings and unanimously agreed that Webb is ready to move forward into its next and final series of preparations
i always wonder about these "unanimous" meetings. i know that at the federal reserve, for example, not having the a decision without unanimous agreement can worry people. so they'll frequently have an informal meeting where the decision is made with possible dissent, and then in the actual meeting "unanimously" agree to the decision.
in an engineering context, it seems likely that you dont have the formal meeting at all until you get the level of agreement you want.
(not casting doubt on the decision, just these types of politics are interesting to me)
I suspect it's more that not everyone had all the information, so once it was all presented together, everyone looked it over and pronounced themselves satisfied that everything was in order and they could proceed to the next phase
we also got this great image from webb. some of these are almost terrifying in the number of stars and their density, reminiscent of Olbers' paradox
https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/wp-content/uploads/sites/326/2022/04/webb_img_sharpness_details_v2.png
im a big fan of the MIRI image (Mid-Infrared Instrument)
these are images of the Large Magellanic Cloud, and until we get the first "official" image from webb, im still hoping that my prediction of horsehead nebula will be the first (real) picture
I see your bet and raise you the Eagle nebula
(I know, you expressed a hope rather than a bet but mine isn't actually a hope per se)
ohhh another good one!
geo, do you have notifications on in here? haha
nope, I just see the title go bold
I keep reading these blog posts with the Homeworld narrator's voice in my mind ever since I thought of that "Mothership scaffold alignment confirmed" comparison
Our task is to analyze all sensor data and generate mission objectives. Before the hyperdrive test, several trials must be completed. Test construction by building the primary research ship. Test resource processing by harvesting the asteroids provided nearby.
The thermal stability exercise will measure these changes by moving between the extremes of Webbâs field of view, from the hot to the cold attitude, spending multiple days in the cold attitude, then slewing back to the hot attitude. During this time, the Webb team will measure the thermal stability, pointing performance and optical wavefront drift. In addition to measuring the performance of the observatory, the team will also check the thermal modeling used to predict observatory behavior.
the diction is clearly different, but I can hear it!
thought: this is basically the exemplification of "trust the data"
"the" ? đ¤
I'm not sure what the agenda of that phrase is in its entirety per se, either
less pithily, the engineers don't have any visual input for the primary functions and so need to rely on an array of sensors to come to conclusions
It is official, alignment of NASAâs James Webb Space Telescope is now complete. The alignment of the telescope across all of Webbâs instruments can be seen in a series of images that captures the observatoryâs full field of view.
Featured in this video are engineering images demonstrating the sharp focus of each instrument. For this test, Webb...
https://twitter.com/AndrasGaspar/status/1519818306634588161 Someone asked about why the stars have a weird ray-bleeding artifact
the resolution is better than the resolution on the jpeg shared
Related to this, the author mentions the first image came after the second. It was from a more general-purpose telescope, so the sequence of images is a bit misleading (it's not a timeline)
the guy seems slightly qualified
Bloody hell
Prior to leading Webb, Robinson served as the deputy associate administrator for programs in NASAâs Science Mission Directorate. He is a veteran executive, who previously served as deputy center director at NASAâs Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, NASA deputy chief engineer, and as the acting National Environmental Satellite, Data, and Information Service deputy assistant administrator at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration.
This may not be JWST, but whoa... https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard/from-a-million-miles-away-nasa-camera-shows-moon-crossing-face-of-earth
the clouds aren't moving enough is the problem I think
the sun tracks across... probably 4 or so hours of time, no cloud motion but it seems like there should be
obvious photoshop
Clouds don't move all that fast on a continental scale
Itâs still about 4 hours though which is the thing
Thatâs enough that I imagine you should be able to see some changes purely from the day cycle
Say the clouds in a huge hurricane move in a straight line at 100km/hr; over this 5-hour animation, that's 500 km movement which is just under 4% of the Earth's 12,742 km diameter. The Earth is about 550px in this image and 550 Ă .04 = 22 pixels maximum change.
ooo
We are now in the last two months of Webbâs commissioning before it is fully ready for its scientific mission.
HYPE
WEW
Visit http://brilliant.org/DrBecky/ to get started learning STEM for free, and the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual premium subscription.
More information on what the James Webb Space Telescope will do - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=O9ZlqWp7620
My previous video about Earendel - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VChgsXbIgdw
My pr...
I forgot that seeing the orbits around the milky way's central black hole involved infrared
It's a week late, but whoever wrote that, circumference should've been used.
How can you have 7 planets closer than Mercury and have a stable orbit smh
When you are looking at one side of a planet, it would be at most half the circumference--and even then, that would not account for nonlinearity from distance and perspective as much as constraining the problem to a short distance and thus being able to assume a near-flat trajectory on a flat surface with the same diameter as the earth
đś I can see clearly now, the rain has gone...
i dont have the emoji to convey the feeling of seeing that huge improvement
this will have to do

I realized that the router was unplugged yesterday so I ran the script manually today, hence the late post
I can see clearly now the blur has gone
I can see all dark matter in my way
Gone are the dust clouds that had me blind
It's gonna be a bright (bright)
Bright (bright) infrared night
James Webb Telescope is decent, have they taken any photos yet?
yes, but the science campaign is still waiting on additional thermal commissioning operations
(they're going to operate with the heatshield in different orientations and assess the response of the telescope and its instruments to the different heat fluxes)
Interactively explore Webb's deployments on this page. Webb is NASA's largest and most powerful space science telescope ever constructed. Webbâs enormous size and frigid operating temperature present extraordinary engineering challenges. After launching from French Guiana, the observatory will travel to an orbit about one million miles away from...
I added a timeout to the systemd service
should be a tad more reliable now
you could also just like forward the rrs feed right
yeah
woho
defibrillator noises
Dammit, you'll ruin the calibrations.
Those were delicate.
small beep
đ July 12 â Save the date!
Count down with us to the big reveal of Webbâs first full-color images and spectroscopic data: https://t.co/hyZAYXvwfN
Want a hint on how Webb will #UnfoldTheUniverse? Read more: https://t.co/tv4SBRv9xI
10561
2294
when you see a human in front of the mirror, you realize it's actually pretty large
true! though in that image we have no sense of parallax, so the gantry could be way closer of farther (though it's likely somewhere near directly centered on the front)âŚ
6.5 m primary, so they're pretty close to it
Also you can see the reflection in the mirror
1. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/05/26/webbs-quest-for-primeval-black-holes/
2. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/05/19/webb-nearly-set-to-explore-the-solar-system/
3. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/05/12/seventeen-modes-to-discovery-webbs-final-commissioning-activities/
4. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/05/09/miris-sharper-view-hints-at-new-possibilities-for-science/
5. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/05/05/examining-the-heart-of-webb-the-final-phase-of-commissioning/
6. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/05/02/nasas-gregory-robinson-named-finalist-for-service-to-america-medal/
7. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/04/29/the-hot-and-cold-of-webb/
8. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/04/28/nasas-webb-in-full-focus-ready-for-instrument-commissioning/
9. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/04/21/is-webb-at-its-final-temperature/
10. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/04/14/webb-will-study-formation-composition-clouds-of-distant-worlds/
I deleted the file storing previously sent links so that that last one would send
1. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/06/03/the-modes-of-webbs-niriss/
2. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/05/26/webbs-quest-for-primeval-black-holes/
3. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/05/19/webb-nearly-set-to-explore-the-solar-system/
4. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/05/12/seventeen-modes-to-discovery-webbs-final-commissioning-activities/
5. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/05/09/miris-sharper-view-hints-at-new-possibilities-for-science/
6. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/05/05/examining-the-heart-of-webb-the-final-phase-of-commissioning/
7. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/05/02/nasas-gregory-robinson-named-finalist-for-service-to-america-medal/
8. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/04/29/the-hot-and-cold-of-webb/
9. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/04/28/nasas-webb-in-full-focus-ready-for-instrument-commissioning/
10. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/04/21/is-webb-at-its-final-temperature/
Days since last Webhook Malfunction: 3
Days since last Webhook Malfunction: 0
Lol
I swear I didn't do anything this time
Gotta make a proper database of articles it's already sent :P
gotta do some error handling for webhook sending :p
did you know: webhooks can apparently unarchive threads
wow, it actually worked this time
so I read it
in other words: webb got hit by a large(r) rock
oh no
is it okay?
the team found the telescope is still performing at a level that exceeds all mission requirements despite a marginally detectable effect in the data
poor baby :(
Makes me wonder how much micrometeoroid abuse the ISS has suffered over the years.
This most recent impact was larger than was modeled, and beyond what the team could have tested on the ground.
đ
possibly less in some ways and more in other ways (more human-made stuff, fewer actual rocks would be my guess)
out at L2, there's no shielding at all except what you bring with you
Ofc, but it has also been running for a considerable time & has less margin to sacrifice components & remain operational.
well, the ISS also has a lot more armor than webb
the ISS's solar arrays are probably the main thing sensitive to small micrometeor impacts
maybe we're saying the same thing, actually
Either nothing has hit it, stuff has hit it in an entirely undramatic fashion, or news simply didn't spread if repairs from a strike was needed.
I'd like to think fixing a space station that is manned would make some kind of newsworthy material.
stuff has hit in an undramatic fashion, mostly; for the big stuff, they move the station
I bet if you looked at the armor layers, you'd find them riddled with pocks
I don't remember if anyone on EVA has been hit by micrometeors or not
I'm awed by the simple fact that it's both detectable and quantifiable
Webbâs tremendous size and sensitivity make it a highly sensitive detector of micrometeorites; over time Webb will help improve knowledge of the solar system dust particle environment at L2, for this and future missions.
Reminds me of a response from one of the Stellaris storylines...
But what can we learn from this?
Intriguing
A funny scene from the original Star Trek series. Spock finally comes up with another term that isn't fascinating.
Lol this is what I was thinking. It is kind of funny that even things impacting the telescope provides science for us, even if a potentially damaging side effect of just being there
Ablative..testing methodology D:
new "telescope" idea: giant sheet of hexagonal tiles full of scintillators and particle/debris trackers
actually might not be a bad idea to put them in various orbits to see what they "see" (feel?) over an extended period of time; we could probably get some very useful statistical data for making better armor
The Philae lander showed why these things need to be over-engineered to hell and back. It had 7 different landing systems and they all failed, leaving it to land upside-down in a ditch, as a solar powered lander đŹ
https://science.slashdot.org/story/22/06/10/0114211/james-webb-telescope-hit-by-large-micrometeoroid
schwit1 shares a report from The Verge: NASA's new powerful space observatory, the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), got pelted by a larger than expected micrometeoroid at the end of May, causing some detectable damage to one of the spacecraft's 18 primary mirror segments. The impact means that the...
Time to go to war with the universe!
space-dust hits super-expensive telescope and everyone but NASA is freaking out over this
They're just biding their time to ask funding for the Megamaid project to deal with the dust.
a project to take the breath away from proponent, critics, and ambivalent parties alike?
JWST all alone, no one to give it chicken noodle soup to feel better
This is truly tragic
re: dust, intersecting with dust, and the misplaced freaking out
wait a sec this was brought up months ago
"server" got unplugged
https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/06/23/webbs-nirspec-acquires-multiple-targets/ don't know what happened this time
can't wait for the mission to start
Died right after the last one 
Super exciting stuff
Also sampling the spectrum of an exoplanet atmosphere
That's more exciting to me I think
Since that's actionable information, if not in our lifetimes
If deep field shows galaxies that are too mature too far away / "early" then it might be evidence of the entire history of the universe needing adjustment
over time we've seen more and more evidence that things have formed surprisingly fast compared to expectation
if the antimatter from the big bang isn't missing, but is actually in halos of neutrinos and higher density in the earlier universe causing time compression--... annnyway
I chose a very interesting time to get into physics lol
By the time I graduate our entire theory of the universe may have changed
we don't have enough neutrino data yet...but there's a hint that matter and antimatter neutrinos oscillate at different rates, and I'm seriously suspicious that it could be due to them having different rates of time progression from their own gravitational influence
if inflation, dark matter, and dark energy turn out to be different facets the same thing (gravitational time compression pushing inward and outward around galaxies)..that's pretty serious
well, the first and last are definitely linked since the latter is the leading hypothesis for the former
you're distinguishing between inflation and accelerating expansion right?
and then there's the bouncing cosmologies
do you mean inflation like metric expansion or inflation like the very first moment of the universe?
the latter
inflation without qualification generally refers to the latter
it's a notoriously difficult thing to study on account of the universe being opaque at that time
like people
worse, really; you can still shove photons above a certain energy right through people
ouch
in fact, there's probably high energy photons passing through all of us right now (just a few)
or are they waves? 
I was going for the double meaning of people being physically opaque but also psychologically obtuse
hehe
either too much energy or not enough energy, they're only opaque if it's the right amount of energy
Yo mama so dense, she could survive Chernobyl 
she also weighs 207.2 grams per mole
now for some reason I'm imagining hooking someone up to a spectrum network analyzer and measuring their transfer function đ
JWST scientists really have that tease kink
Telling us this and making us wait till 12th
NASA said it plans to release several images beginning at 10:30 am ET (14:30 UTC) on July 12, the result of Webb's "first light" observations
yoooo
10 days cant wait
Saaaaaaaame
JWST: I waited for 10 years; you can wait for 10 days!
I waited 10 years too!
Just to be clear, anyone online at this time should find and post links/photos for the rest of us. That way we are all notified asap
we'll be the webbhook we want to see in the world
I've got enough of these so it's confusing due to Discord not supporting different sounds per-source, but..maybe.. 
of course I have those enabled. But I personally won't be the first to see the images, most likely.
can we get an @ everyone ping (or a pinglist) when pictures come out
I just got pinged for that message, along with everyone who enables notifications for the thread. (see above)
Can't wait to see!
1. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/07/01/how-to-see-webbs-first-images/
2. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/06/30/another-webb-telescope-instrument-gets-the-go-for-science/
3. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/06/27/webbs-niriss-ready-to-see-cosmos-in-over-2000-infrared-colors/
4. https://blogs.nasa.gov/webb/2022/06/23/webbs-nirspec-acquires-multiple-targets/
Countdown: How many minutes left? The official countdown is at https://webb.nasa.gov/content/webbLaunch/countdown.html
Watch: See the images revealed in real-time and hear from experts about the exciting results on NASA TV at 10:30am Eastern on July 12: https://www.nasa.gov/nasalive
View: Just interested in the amazing imagery? You will be able to find the first images and spectra at: https://www.nasa.gov/webbfirstimages
Participate: Attend, virtually or in-person, one of hundreds of official Webb Space Telescope Community Events happening in the next few months! Find an event near you at: https://webbtelescope.org/news/first-images/events
Socialize: Follow along on Twitter, Facebook, and Instagram with @NASA and @NASAWebb using #UnfoldTheUniverse!
Download: High-resolution downloads and supplemental content will be available for download at: https://webbtelescope.org/news/first-images
Ask: On July 13, ask your questions about these first images and spectra using #UnfoldtheUniverse, and you could see them answered on NASA Science Live at: https://www.nasa.gov/nasasciencelive
Countdown to the release NASA's Webb Space Telescope 1st first full-color images and spectroscopic data. The James Webb Space Telescope (sometimes called Webb or JWST) is a large infrared telescope with a 6.5-meter primary mirror. Webb will be the premier observatory of the next decade, serving thousands of astronomers worldwide. It will study...
NASA launches, landings, and events. Watch live broadcasts from NASA Television and NASA's social media channels, and a schedule of upcoming live events including news briefings, launches and landings.
NASA.gov brings you the latest images, videos and news from America's space agency. Get the latest updates on NASA missions, watch NASA TV live, and learn about our quest to reveal the unknown and benefit all humankind.
When the world needed him most, he returned
webbhook is the webhook we needed, not the one we deserved đ
The James WebbHook?
interesting link https://illuminateduniverse.org/2021/04/01/image-artifacts/
from https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/vtjxet/even_the_webb_telescopes_engineering_test_images/
Interesting read on image artifacts.
Politics o.O
Eh, not a big deal imo. NASA is inherently an independent agency of the U.S. federal government, so having the president reveal images isn't some huge shift of no politics involvement to some politics involvement.
Having the president apparently show non-zero interest in science related things feels kinda nice.
I'm a bit cynical about the intention for the sentiments to flow the other way instead but agreed
Bit interesting that the reveal of one pic is one day ahead of the others & not a continuous event.
Anyone have links of comparison images showing Hubble, ground telescope images of the JWST press release targets? Or probably best to wait for the press release since people will do the comparisons then.
Sounded like 16 hours ahead of the other images. Effectively is the same time.
I'm taken aback because I thought the space program was more directly under the vice-president's direction
first pic leaked early
Now you will experience the resolution of this fully-calibrated and operational space telescope. Science at will, commander!
37 minutes
I thought so too
yeah they totally changed the timeline
They have altered the timeline, pray they do not alter it further!
NASA'll have those images up, we just gotta give 'em more time!
stay on target, stay on target
Well, it says momentarily. Music to listen to, I guess.. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=21X5lGlDOfg
Direct from America's space program to YouTube, watch NASA TV live streaming here to get the latest from our exploration of the universe and learn how we discover our home planet.
NASA TV airs a variety of regularly scheduled, pre-recorded educational and public relations programming 24 hours a day on its various channels. The network also prov...
Now I can't remove the image of JWST powering up & firing like the Death Star as a camera flash to take those pictures....
Itâs more like a death star on light suck mode though 
That alt text đ
it takes a long time to charge up; after a few decades of operation, it should have collected enough photons to fire quite the intense IR beam at the target of our choice đ
is it not more like Starkiller base, where it consumes a star in the process?
Our gravitational anchor is a small price to pay for science
I'm enjoying this music, though
130k viewers. Rising. Not bad.
its already late
tho its one day early so I guess we cant complain
I'm dual wielding the superheavy B7 test livestream and the JWST livestream
(B7 just had a very un-nominal explosion)
wait how come I didnt see this channel until someone said it in chat
It's a thread, it's not shown by default
I saw some people talking about Elon Musk being rich in this chat. I cannot believe there are actually people in the government who call him a mooch. If you produce more value than you take... making rockets reland themselves has got to be worth billions, then half that goes to taxes, and he only pays his actual personal account minimum wage? Give me a break
I don't like him, but I like what he does. This is definitely a conversation for #more-offtopic though
this is for JWST fanboiism. not Musky fandom. js.
I'm waiting at a restaurant and this NASA stream is still just saying momentarily
meanwhile we're all getting pings for this convo
(at this rate, you will arrive in the #programming channel basement within the hour đ )
11:08pm, do I go to bed...
frankly u can't complain about it
maybe in time JWST will explain why tf it was 30C in north-east UK
I'm not really, but this doesn't concern the thread topic. also my name isn't Frank đ
well, we're eight minutes past the hour, so I think we can rule this out for now, unless something else went wrong
youtube says t-2min
what stream?
stream
NASA's yt says begin momentarily
also its apparently going to be a deep field image?
Time is relateve. It is known.
no you dont understand, it did start when it was supposed to, it just has to arrive now
I should be writing GUI code, but here I am staring at my screen like a child on christmas morning
I'm about as impatient as a child too
It's starting aye
The stars have aligned!
Lol, all I had to do was complain!
the light has arrived!
An historic occasion. Off to a great start!

Any bets at how long we have to sit through political junk before they actually show us the picture?
"I'd like to thank the Academy ..."
we know, kamala
As long as they spare us the kids interpretations in the form of drawings of the event.
No joke, this is literally the first time I have seen her since the election. I forgot what she looked like
I shouldve went to bed
I can't get over SL lady's expressions
it looks like me explaining my trip to Casa Ole
I'm just muting it and will unmute when I see aliens
doing the opposite but with headphones off
blah blah blah america blah blah blah
in no small part, expressions are part of ASL
FBI will have the aliens pixelated.
Sorry in advance.
AHFRICK just got a work call nooo
lol could you imagine if they did it super obviously
"sorry, Raiguard died. He'll call you tomorrow."
hey look biden said "a historic" :P
a SUUUUUUUUUUU
oh that wasnt just me
The audio got stuck looping for me just now. Welp.
reload page
its fixed now for me no reload needed

We haven't even seen an image, and he's asking for money
PIC
dont say more-offtopic things, even though I know I want to
... but then I got high.
enhance!
its a blurry starfield WORTH IT
and it's still a frame wihin a frame
I like the fact that it's showing so much lensing
give us a download link to the full quality image
sorry, when did we ever think there was one galaxy?
That looks really cool!
4000BC?
when the other galaxies were nebulae
No, it was last century.
I speedran that call so fast lol
Spot the monoliths!
Even plate tectonics were last century.
3.5 minutes
because 'murica
can someone screenshot the pic at a highish quality
youtube is capping it at 720p60
when Nancy Grace Roman Telescope thread?
Oh yeah, it's NASA TV. 720p lol
well ive seen the pic now
good enough I'm no mobile rn
off to bed, ill look at the hopefully 64k or whatever image tomorrow
wonder what itll look like pointed at a relatively nearby planet
worlds most powerful spy sattelite
I can't wait for the spectrograph data
There is probably a high res version here, but the site is down
I wonder why 
Here's a higher res version than a youtube screenshot, at least
Look at all of the gravitational lensing going on
i'm not an astrologer. Is that lens flare in the center?
Probably just a ton of dust
OOooh, ambience.
my god it's full of galaxies
From what I can tell, the full res uncompressed version will be released tomorrow. This is just a preview like the title said
time to hack nasa's database to get the uncensored version that has alien life
But man, I keep zooming in and finding more galaxies!
dammit, space!
The observable universe, now as a NFT.
I bet there are already several dozen NFTs of this (attempting) to be sold
where is the nasa website link for the image
Here
Welp, I've got a new profile banner
desktop and mobile background here
darnit the embedded icon in the bottom left obscures the smooshy galaxy
also I turned off notifications for this thread 
I love the sense of depth in this snippet though
Smooshed lensed galaxy on the left
Hubble's view of the same area
Comparison image, nice.
Bit rusty on my gravitational lensing, but I assume the center dusty area is because of foreground galaxy cluster (the dusty bit) which is massive enough to create the lensing on either side of it.
So the ultra extra deep objects would be the distorted objects.
I find the Ars Technica writers do a good job of making this type of info more readable for non experts.
Eric Berger is a pretty decent reporter
I like how you can tell which is which by the diffraction spikes: the secondary mirror on HST has 4 struts and point sources have 4 spikes, while JWST only has 3 struts so stars have 6 spikes
0 votes and 0 comments so far on Reddit
Gif toggling between the two images. Presumably the galaxies visible only on the IR of JWST are the especially distant (red shifted).
Deploy the armchair astronomy.
Today I discovered that my sense of time stops in between messages. Does this mean that I live on a computer somewhere?
wow it looks so much better!!
||this is a joke. i took the old image and clicked "auto levels" in my photo editor||
This needs not-Reddit/Discord image compression
I mean more the comparison image on that post
I fear the takeaway from it is going to be âwow it sees more colorsâ and not âwow look at how much more detail we seeâ
It could use two presentations: One for the overall view, and one focusing in on a smudged part of the Hubble image and showing the true full resolution so zoomed that it won't suffer much from compression when reposted
Direct from America's space program to YouTube, watch NASA TV live streaming here to get the latest from our exploration of the universe and learn how we discover our home planet.
NASA TV airs a variety of regularly scheduled, pre-recorded educational and public relations programming 24 hours a day on its various channels. The network also prov...
The presentation is currently taking place. You can scrub through the youtube vod in real time btw.
That is me, yes
the NASA site has 2 images of the Southern Planetary Nebula but isnt clear what the difference is. Is one Hubble or is one taken with a different camera?
im thinking different camera but....
one on the right doesnt have the tell-tale 6-point stars that webb appears to make but that could be instrument based
but IIRC it was because the mirrors are hexagonal
one on the right also appears more blurry and less contrasty
oh text clarifies
"Two cameras aboard Webb captured the latest image of this planetary nebula, cataloged as NGC 3132, and known informally as the Southern Ring Nebula. It is approximately 2,500 light-years away."
I love the left one though, the texture it appears to have reminds me of...coral or bone marrow?
or an eye
the only real question I have is "wtf is that?"
some sort of massive accretion disk?
(left side of image, about a third down)
if anything it makes me think its a black hole tbh
or a far-off galaxy photobombing
thanks! but which is which?
iunno
the left one was taken by the NIRCam i believe
in the image from Webbâs Near-Infrared Camera (NIRCam) on the left, while the image from Webbâs Mid-Infrared Instrument (MIRI) on the right shows for the first time that the second star is surrounded by dust
i definitely think that's a galaxy
its almost certainly a galaxy
probably but maybe its not
the resolution on this nebula picture is blowing my mind
the universe is not obligated to be your wallpaper
well maybe the universe shouldnt look awesome
here's the sombrero galaxy for comparison
the right image looks more like what i would expect
Surely not since JWST only captures in infrared?
yeah it cant be true color because the cameras they used take infrared but it could be blueshifted into color. or it could be something else
i see
for example in this picture of the southern planetary ring nebula from hubble blue is hotter gasses, orange/red is cooler gasses
surely we know what the materials of the layers are and can approximate the color we would see
iirc it's usually very pink
my discord banner
thats also possible! you could have artists go in and pick a color to add in manually
i like talking about space in a non space discord because i cannot be judged for wrong conclusions
unlike when i'm talking in spaceengine
everyone knows everything
so i couldn't find a true color image of the southern ring nebula, but here's an amateur photograph of the ring nebula in true color, taken by a redditor with a 6" newtonian
Not very far off
@old charm you were complaining that the JWST comparison image was too low res .... I dont think people care. found this beaut in another discord LOL
oh god
fullres images:
https://stsci-opo.org/STScI-01G7ETPF7DVBJAC42JR5N6EQRH.png
https://stsci-opo.org/STScI-01G7DBWJJF54AX1DDP8KJ6XCPQ.png
https://stsci-opo.org/STScI-01G7DB1FHPMJCCY59CQGZC1YJQ.png
https://stsci-opo.org/STScI-01G786E1PW9RMK51EP0DZSM03B.png
https://stsci-opo.org/STScI-01G79R51118N21AAZ9MZ8XWWQ6.png
https://stsci-opo.org/STScI-01G7JJADTH90FR98AKKJFKSS0B.png
LOL discord cannot handle them
@thorn musk The video presentation astronomer for that image mentioned that it was a background Galaxy.
I think whatâs equally as impressive is Hubble took two weeks to take that image JWST took a couple hours
wasnt it 15 hours or was that another image?
Not sure on the exact time, all I know is the exposure dates only include the 7th of June and the nasa lady said âit was done before breakfastâ
My work colleague doesnât think we ever went to the moon đ¤Śââď¸
Show him the reflector we placed on the moonâŚ
its okay, I dont believe he exists either
interesting that there's a distorion between them near the edges of the image
that site really does not like dynamic browser zoom
Rip mobile users clicking that comparison image link đ (because itâs super data heavy which is bad if data limited)
works just fine on mobile for me
Not sure I understand, does the picture cover one-fifth of the moon if it were printed in full-res? Or is the part of the sky that jwt recorded to make this picture, the size of 1/5 the moon seen from earth?
1/5 the angular size of the moon (ie 6 arcminutes)
That is a relatively big part of the sky
I just noticed this regarding the deep field image with the lensing-
This slice of the vast universe covers a patch of sky approximately the size of a grain of sand held at armâs length by someone on the ground.
Yup, there's a lot of stuff around us...
I heard the grain of sand irl is commonly 2-20x smaller than the value given by the NASA metric; still impressive.
lol
Obviously itâs a very high error margin metric to give people some idea of the field of view being discussed. Arm length varies; sand grain size varies; overall value ends up highly imprecise.
as long as it gets you to the right order of magnitude ...
classic physicist 
anyone know the actual angle of the photo? i havent been able to find it online! but I feel like it should be somewhere
'angle of the photo'⌠as in, where in the sky it was pointed?
Angular size?
The actual NASA image page should contain all the proper image documentation. Number of arc seconds or arc minutes. I assume that was mentioned just above.
Using the moon for scale is pretty nice imo.
Zoom in, sequence: https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/vy8u7x/a_progress_of_images_taking_us_from_an_ground/
Zoom out, animated: https://www.reddit.com/r/gifs/comments/vygdk0/i_made_this_short_video_that_zooms_out_of_jwsts/
7,143 votes and 145 comments so far on Reddit
very cool
weird..the embed of the gif cuts off a lot inside Discord (this is from the site)
Offtopic space question, does any one know how to interpret the planck cmb map? It's an oval 2D image, but does it represent a 3D ovoid radiation map seen from one side or how come it's oval?
Hm.. I think I found the answer
The Mollweide projection is an equal-area, pseudocylindrical map projection generally used for maps of the world or celestial sphere. It is also known as the Babinet projection, homalographic projection, homolographic projection, and elliptical projection. The projection trades accuracy of angle and shape for accuracy of proportions in area, and...
bruh.
it finally makes sense
not like i understand how it actually can be put to use
was the universe always expanding "faster" than the speed of light?
I dont think thats answerable because it could be the case that its spatially infinite in which case you can probably always pick two points and show they move apart faster than c
and if its not spatially infinite then early on its likely not the case
Best so far- https://www.reddit.com/r/space/comments/vys73z/where_in_the_night_sky_exactly_are_the_cosmic/
Fans of Jupiter will recognize
LETS GO JUPITER
i wish they gave more info about exposure times and stuff. they mention the blown out image that has the rings was a one minute exposure, but not much else
lol guys
of course the photo release was delayed
it's the james webb! It was it's last final delay
I don't think current cosmological models claim that; during the inflationary period, it may have been, though
ah, right, I guess that's a better way of phrasing my comment
the inflationary era led to a causally-disconnected region; everything within that border (causally-accessible to us) is the Hubble volume, I guess
my understanding is that it is not known if the universe is infinitely large. if it is, then hexi's answer seems right -- you can always find two points that are moving away from each other at or faster than the speed of light
my other understanding is that the universe expanded quickly near the start, then slowed down for a while. more recently, the expansion has been accelerating
the phrase "expanding faster than the speed of light" is problematic yeah
it requires defining at least two points to measure the expansion between, which can be entirely arbitrary
my understanding is that its not known which of the two - space and time - are infinite, if either
if I understand things properly the universe could be ageless but finite
in an endless bang-crunch cycle
the only thing you can reasonably infer is that at least one of them is finite
otherwise youd have light from all directions
that's a question of density, not size
the universe cannot be infinite, static and homogeneous
(current thinking says the universe is not static)
i dont think there's any reason to think that at least time or space need be be infinite, could be neither as far as i know
did you mean for the first could to be should?
yes
the universe can be infinite with a finite amount of mass
I dont think there needs to be a finite amount of mass
as long as the distribution is homogeneous at a large scale the forces cancel out
and with finite time you dont have the fullbright sky issue
hubble volume is simultaneously finite causality and possibly infinite chain of volumes making up more than the observable universe
Wikipedia, what are you doing?
Olbers's's's's
I'm glad galaxies are prettier in visible light
no way infrared looks crazy cool
vislight = pretty
IR = cool
Did someone happen to drop the full-full size image of the cosmic cliffs in here at some point?
ah, found it
Itâs interesting to consider that at the distances and scales that astronomy telescopes observe, the wavelength of light is irrelevant for the resolving power (generally). Since objects like stars are massively larger than the wavelength of light.
Also, the broader fields of spectroscopy and spectrometry have a lot of additional breadth that isnât possible for telescopes like JWST despite there seemingly like a large difference between Hubble and JWST.
it actually does matter! because the telescope's size in relation to the wavelength becomes significant
I was more speaking to the size of the objects being viewed. The telescope size is definitely a consideration.
I assume the objects being viewed are more limited by like the amount of photons created and the resolving power of the telescope means that every object is really big.
Guess it needs an IRL example where the light being detected by an instrument/camera is based on being a completely different class of object. With astronomy I'd assume that a lot of the objects being viewed appear in a broad range of wavelengths ala stars viewable because of thermal emission.
Maybe cosmic dust is a category where you need specific wavelengths of light to view it. Gamma ray, x-ray specific emission maybe also has very specific targets that aren't viewable at other wavelengths.
Idk. I'm just meandering around here without any specific, well thought out ideas.
.
JWST viewing galaxies (stars) in IR despite the original light being higher frequency is interesting. It especially highlights how it's all the same electromagnetic radiation emitted by similar objects (stars), detected by telescopes.
Now I wonder what causes dust to fully obstruct visible light. Is it direct absorption or a form of scattering. Hmmm. Ala JWST's ability to see dust obstructed stars.
probably both absorption and scattering
Yea. I assume some of both.
That's..an unexpected indirect source of this information :P https://www.reddit.com/r/Stellaris/comments/w2fodt/we_may_soon_find_out_if_it_looks_the_same_as_it/
theyre very optimistic on the resolving power of JWST :P
at best itll confirm that general compositions match as well as orbits
The viewing schedule for Webb: https://www.stsci.edu/jwst/science-execution/observing-schedules
According to a later tweet from Dr. Becky, it updates every Friday.
(from the reddit thread)
Friday Webb Facts đ
Good telescope that I've used to learn the basics: https://amzn.to/35r1jAk
Get a Wonderful Person shirt: https://teespring.com/stores/whatdamath
Alternatively, PayPal donations can be sent here: http://paypal.me/whatdamath
Hello and welcome! My name is Anton and in this video, we will talk about the unexpected damage from the meteoroid collisio...
Visit http://brilliant.org/DrBecky/ to get started learning STEM for free, and the first 200 people will get 20% off their annual premium subscription.
See all the early release science project descriptions and proposals here, the data from which is now public: https://www.stsci.edu/jwst/science-execution/approved-ers-programs
All raw JWST dat...

