#Roller splitter to basic sorter = ore Stuck
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I don't think that this is an intended combination of buildings.
Is that a bug though ?
ok ,if its not intended to combine those two,then please make the same roller splitter, but in basic version to, cus the roller splitter is much better then the basic splitter . .
Now that has to do with the difference in the speeds of normal & roller conveyors.
Basically the roller version of this splitter must be faster to keep-up with those conveyors.
Disregard this I confused splitters with sorters here 🤦.
nah, i dont care about the speed itself, its the fact,that the basic spliter is to cramped to handle to much input.. it does not split 50/50 on 2 outputs like the longer roller version. (in comparison, the baic is a 1x1, the R-splitter is a 2x2)
*also tried the same setup,with the Q-splitter, same outcome. it cant keep up at all.
- and best part of it, Mk2 with hardend bit. (turbo+ will overflow in seconds)
🤦 I misinterpreted what you were saying.
Yeah, those could perchance get an upgrade.
If not, we could get belt type adapter/-s as well
(normal --> roller & vice versa).
Also, you're overloading that poor Smart Splitter,
so that might be a part of why it doesn't split as intended.
yeah, there is no 1:3 splitter at all.
Also, is there a reason why you can't use roller sorters here?
Yeah, you should use the roller sorters