More activation groups

[swift wren]

This very likely was already suggested but couldnt find a post about it.
8 activation groups are limiting, 12-14 imo could be max before there are too many, you mignt say you dont have number keys for more BUT you could have them as new keybinds (F,X,T,caps etc.)

[hybrid junco]

just use FT

8 activation groups is enough for essential things you might wish to control from outside of a cockpit; everything else can be controlled via switches/buttons/variables as needed

[swift wren]

Lame.

And very few people make cockpits

[hybrid junco]

I would think anything without a cockpit wouldn't need more than 8
Any more and you might as well add some sort of control area

[abstract terrace]

We need to be able to do more with less funky tbh

[magic grail]

I disagree. Making Funky trees more accessible and user friendly should be the end goal. For what it is, it's a very powerful tool.

With doing more with less funky trees you're implying a funky trees-like solution, that does what funky trees does, but in a prettier packaging, which is just duplicated effort, adds more variables, which increases the likelihood of bugs, conflicting variables, etc, which won't be a fun time for anyone. All for functionality that technically already exists.

[abstract terrace]

True, though some options such as firerate max angle heading adjustment rate and similar could be options, though a simplified funky would be very welcomed

[icy pendant]

on the flipside Juno kind of already achieved this without any of the hiccups you describe. vizzy is a powerful in-game programming language that's more accessible than funkytrees and can be used alongside it