#Fix 1v1.lol
64 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
yes'
I'll try ig
ill give 7 stars
i'll give 50 stars
51 stars
52
who
55
55.2\
53.5
100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
100000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
beat that
100 million people
Give me a few minutes
f(x) =x^^^^G64, g(x) =f(f(x)), and t(x) =g(g(g(x))). t(100^100^100^100^^^^^100000)
10058229664811834580100852784
That's not eve remotely close
The number I made is much greater hmthan if you had an entire universe per atom in our universe and counted the atoms of the new universes
Google ai said thats the number
Google Ai is stupid
By having the number in t be greater than 1, it is a number so long that if you were to have every human on earth write it out for the rest of their lives, assuming they lived until the heat death of the universe, they wouldn't come to 1% even
f(x) =x^^^^G64, g(x) =f(f(x)), and t(x) =g(g(g(x))). t(100^100^100^100^^^^^100001) stars
i beat u
Technically yes but with numbers that high you kinda have it completely change something with the exponentiation to make any meaningful change