#Update Civilopedia for new razing penalty

3 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

tough maple
#

After changing the penalty for razing settlements the Civilopedia entry for it now shows wrong information since it has not been updated.

Also the new penalty is to double the "usual Influence penalty for conquest" (which is fine), however that "usual Influence penalty" is not explained or mentioned anywhere in the game. The information about the usual Influence penalty should at the very least also be added to the Civilopedia (possibly to the city capture entry).
Edit: I see the Influence penalty has been added to the keep/raze selection screen. Nice. The Civilopedia should still be updated.

image.png
acoustic imp
# tough maple After changing the penalty for razing settlements the Civilopedia entry for it n...

Very good point! I suspect however, that a better, more direct route to getting specific issues like inaccurate/obsolete Civilopedia entries fixed is to file a Bug Report (make sure to pick the issue type "Text" in the drop-down). Feedback posts get gathered up and summarized to Design team to potentially include in future plans, whereas Bug Reports create a tracking ticket, get assigned for investigation, triaged, and assigned to dev to fix.

I think filing a text correction Bug Report should hopefully be relatively straightforward. (Unlike a more complicated gameplay bug/issues, where the Bug Reporting process can be more involved since it may require more information to accurately convey the relevant context to investigative team)

My suggestions on what to include in Bug Report:

Gameplay -> Military:

  • Razing penalty no longer grants free War Support against you and instead now just doubles the usual Influence penalty from conquest for the rest of the Age.
tough maple