Modern WebUI

[round hazel]

I thought the WebUI needed a nice update.

@tepid viper

in case you are interested

[tepid viper]

Interesting

@mighty orbit

[round hazel]

maybe should only change js but I don't think so I didn't add anything related to js

[sturdy jewel]

Is it responsive?

[round hazel]

it has nothing special it only has small snags of the colored edges

but if you want reactive stuff I can try but I don't know if something happens in the sense that maybe it doesn't work

[sturdy jewel]

But i mean on pc and phone and other devices

Like media query

[round hazel]

considering that I modified the entire original script it works on all devices

then in this case nothing prevents improvement, nothing is 100% perfect

[sturdy jewel]

But nice

Chatgpt code😭

[round hazel]

https://tenor.com/view/take-a-bow-the-office-michael-scott-gif-7303242777894021063

[sturdy jewel]

Caught in 4k

[round hazel]

let's say a quarter is since I wrote it on a phone and I'll be on the train so it's not like the connection is who knows how wonderful the rest I wrote it

[sturdy jewel]

Bro the whole css is chatgpt

The whole comments on the line where he edits something

Just be honest💀

[round hazel]

oh yes css it is, I suck at css in html even more in fact I made myself the director of typos since I wrote it on a train

[sturdy jewel]

Then what did you do?

Js?

[round hazel]

but until proven otherwise imprint and that is that it improves the look of the WebUI

[sturdy jewel]

True but you made it look like you made it tbh

[round hazel]

js and I haven't changed it yet, it's on github

[round hazel]

really? lol sorry my english sucks

[sturdy jewel]

*chatgpt hasn‘t changed it yet

[round hazel]

I didn't touch it at all

even if I know or I haven't touched it because my intention was to give a better look to WebUI not give new features

or am I wrong?

[round hazel]

But i asked for help in improving the design, but I adapted it to my specific needs. I don’t see the mistake here—what matters is that it’s clearer, more modern, and easier to understand. Even experienced developers use AI for improvements.

then if for you it is more important how it is written rather than for the need and convenience that is another thing

._.

[tepid viper]

What if the storage information was a bar graph?

[sturdy jewel]

You need to do that with js

[tepid viper]

Yes, values are going there now, as a json object

[mighty orbit]

yesss this is awesome! im horrible at frontend, thankss i gonna make some tests with it later

[round hazel]

Dw, now people complain even if you get a little help from the AI ​​but let's forget it, good luck in that case just ask

[round hazel]

in js is better than in HTML or CSS

[tepid viper]

I don't complain.. I use it a lot! 🤣

[sturdy jewel]

I use it too but i understood that you said that you did it by yourself. Sorry if i was rude

[round hazel]

News?

more than anything to know if you had any problems

[lime sand]

The reason the bruce code is so basic is because it takes so little flash memory, this is complicating it, raising the storage only slightly but still

I’d rather have a basic webui and a lot of files than having a high quality menu that I’ll barely access

[lime sand]

I know this is ai but there’s a bunch of useless ones such as file manager, even tho littlefs / sd card is there and also network monitor would likely be hard to implement for the devs but idk

[round hazel]

if the creators are ok with the webUI improvement, it stays as it is. discussion closed

[lime sand]

Idk man I doubt after seeing how much more storage it’ll take that they’ll still want it

I’d much rather have the simple ui anyway