#chem eqbm

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

elder cloak
#

24s1 peeps did u really solve that? anyway to approximate that abomination

timber streamBOT
#

<@&1227988359910260737>

#
Note for OP

+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.

lone parrot
#

lmao this is exactly why i forgot to solve it in time

#

i kept it for later

lone parrot
#

thats the problem with PC numericals

#

changing 5.75 to 5.8 gives you 945

#

i dont know what other approximation you'd think of that'd actually simply your calculations and give you the correct answer

elder cloak
lone parrot
elder cloak
#

nah i like PC

lone parrot
#

PC numericals*

elder cloak
#

but this is smthing else

#

sm diff shit

lone parrot
#

brainrot

#

systemic problem

elder cloak
#

peak brainrot fr

#

i was doing chem kinetics and got 4 pyqs wrong solely because of calc

candid lake
#

they test you being a calculator in such koschens??

elder cloak
#

legit req ans se 1 kam

elder cloak
candid lake
#

L exam

#

nahi dena

#

L

elder cloak
#

sadly dena toh padega

lone parrot
#

trust me bro in physical chem numericals

#

do not approximate

#

if you're gonna approximate

#

think thrice

#

how much the approximation will have an effect on your answer

lone parrot
#

if they've asked with less precision and the numbers you get wont have a large impact, and your approximations are small enough and the terms you're approximating aren't squared or something, then maybe you'll get correct answer

#

its an art

#

better is to just not do it

elder cloak
#

time to rise

#

heil-

lone parrot
#

-hitler

#

:D

lone parrot
#

im literally the worst mod

elder cloak
#

890 smthing

lone parrot
#

they're asking you for more decimal points

elder cloak
#

yeahh

#

kash sari calc aisi hoti

#

this pretty much the same question i posted but so much better calc

elder cloak
#

+solved @lone parrot