#JA 2024 PHY + solved

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

narrow vigil
#

In this when we conserve angular momentum of bigger disc, why don't we add mr^2 (due to small disc) while writing moment of inertia of big disc, as the small disc is attached to the big disc
(+solved @vivid charm )

untold atlasBOT
#

<@&1227987967939838003>

#
Note for OP

+solved @user1 @user2... to close the thread when your doubt is solved. Mention the users who helped you solve the doubt. This will be added to their stats.

wild shadow
#

,rotate

muted boneBOT
vivid charm
#

motor shaft is attached to circumfrence

#

small disc is not attached to bigger disc

narrow vigil
#

nvm bro i understood

vivid charm
#

so why do we need to apply the mr^2>

narrow vigil
vivid charm
#

nah

#

read ques

#

your in 11th?

narrow vigil
#

lemme check

vivid charm
#

come dms ill explain its a simple msitake

#

i also did it

narrow vigil
#

the motor is fixed to the disk bro

#

its given in the question

vivid charm
#

yes agreed

narrow vigil
#

however i know why we dont add mr^2

vivid charm
#

but why do we need to add mr^2to the disc?

narrow vigil
#

yeah i made a blunder

vivid charm
#

why?

narrow vigil
#

cause about the central axis the system is rotating with some omega

#

so about that axis i can write the angular momenta individually

#

for each body

#

if i am unclear then leave this doubt i asked something stupid

vivid charm
#

nothing is stupid man

#

genuine only

#

it odnt matter how others think

narrow vigil
#

real

#

thank you though

#

for acknowledging

#

the doubt

vivid charm
#

isme kya thank you

#

btw you solved?

#

the problem?

narrow vigil
#

yeah yeah

#

just conserve angular momenta

#

cause all torque is internal

vivid charm
narrow vigil
storm tartan
narrow vigil
#

JA 2024 PHY + solved

molten lion
#

@narrow vigil put a message in thread with adding +solved and tagging people who solved

narrow vigil
#

got it

#

+solved @vivid charm