#How to use Bubblejail?
1 messages Β· Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I assumed all programs were already bubblejailed, or am I wrong to assume that..?
I'm pretty sure that's not the case. If so, how would you manage the permissions for each program, if you don't create an instance first
yes, very wrong
bubblejail is preinstalled for convenience, but it doesn't even work ootb
as it requires unprivileged, unconfined user namespaces
which are a security risk
oh π€ so regular rpms don't have any more sandboxing than on regular Silverblue?
yup
use flatpaks π
hm I see, well it's still good to have all the other security things
what you're describing is a fundamental flaw in desktop linux security (and desktop OSes in general)
your best bet is to move as much as possible to a model resembling android
"lock down" the system, and use applications that are sandboxed
also I should mention @gentle swan that Trivalent isn't sandboxed per se but is relatively strongly confined by SELinux
so if something isn't a flatpak, using a Trivalent PWA is a good option
oh, good to know, thank you
I just hope a Discord PWA would have the same notifications as the desktop app
and that they wouldn't be muted
the policy if you're interested^
it doesn't really, iirc
not even if you manually enable notifications for the Discord website?
oh
then it might
idk
i keep notifs off π
otherwise it would be buzzing all day
yeah I'll try it out tomorrow when I finally get the time to install Secureblue for real
I filter them to be just personal messages and stuff cuz of "what if it's something important" which it has been a lot more times than I thought hah
So to answer my original question: Could you send me a guide on how to use bubblejail. Because the program I wanna install doesn't have an official flatpack. So I guess installing the official non-flatpack version would still be better than the unofficial flatpack.
I'm not aware of a bubblejail guide
the unverified flatpak may be preferable
it depends
on?
on what you're trying to protect against and whether you're comfortable subscribing to and reading changes to the unverified flatpak manifest
in general I'd personally prefer the unverified flatpak
it also depends on the app
as for some app there is no "verified" way to use it at all on fedora
like steam
whether you use the rpm, the arch package, or the flatpak, it's all unverified
because valve only publishes a deb
As I'm not really an IT person, I don't think I will get much from reading the flatpak manifest. I would just prefer what is generally the safest option. I'm planning to install this https://apps.ankiweb.net/#downloads And the flatpak here seems to be community built https://flathub.org/apps/net.ankiweb.Anki
I personally don't have the expertise to judge what's the better option, that's why I'm asking
@tender ledge ?
hi π
Wouldn't something like this help you ?
Bubblejail Bubblejail is a great tool for sandboxing programs in linux. You may install it from the AUR (bubblejail or bubblejail-git). You should also install the slirp4netns package from the main repositories. It offers a graphical interface for creating and customizing sandboxes, however it is recommended to familiarize yourself with the con...
like I said above, I'd personally prefer using the flatpak
but it would be best with a degree of checking the flatpak manifest
Alright, thanks for the help
GoofCord is good
It's on flathub
I've been told that even Discord's official flatpak client is less secure than a Discord PWA, so Goofcord is probably the same
Yeah, ideally use the official client for the best functionality, or the PWA for security, everything else sacrifices one of these two or both, also risks your account
PWA doesn't break TOS tho
and with the pending IPO i suspect they might start changing their tune on that
GoofCord has privacy features at least
And use Wayland
I did this with Bitwarden
I'm using the Web vault and the Extension
Because Bitwarden Flatpak client is just X11
Sadly
A password manager without screen protection
"A secure and free password manager for all of your devices"
For me it's just really secure on Android
same goes for most messengers as well
Yeah
But the password manager is even more sensitive
At least the extension has his beauty
Is this setup safe? How much an profile/user on Chromium is isolated?
I called this profile "Vault", but how much is it? Lol
what are trying to prevent by using multiple profiles?
a website exploiting the extension?
Browser fingerprinting
I don't want websites I navigate seeing this extensions
they can't, just disable the extension's access to those sites
Manual proccess?
or block general site access and make it click-to-allow
Whitelist mode is not good for me
The first time I open the website will see the extension
Just like Incognito accessed will be "protected" in this case
websites only see the extension if the extension makes it's presence known, or an exploit in the engine which is a bigger issue
what?
Using multiple profiles seems not useful to you?
Is it possible?
? @brazen horizon is trying to explain it to you .....
it is
not for this specific purpose
Ok, is there any use case?
for multiple profiles?