#Election is underwhelming
1 messages Ā· Page 2 of 1
also downloaded btos 2 to play with a friend (it was super easy as well)
Im a competitive TiS player
LOL
TOS ranked makes as much sense as DBD ranked
I won a CtF tournament
you mean ranked coven when there is just 4 coven as evil?
the issue is neutrals
and too much focus on "meta"
Dw guys I have 2000 ELO in TOS1 ranked fr
i won the gold medal in pandora town traitor
for town it's a puzzle and for coven it's "don't suck"
Elo literally means nothing in a game with luck mechanics, but anyways
i dont think ive ever even played the 10 ranked practice games in ToS1
and for neutrals you suffer for everyone else's entertainment
Imo if you do more than just boot up the game and play it, you're not a causal lmao
not jester
Jester actually turns the tides on that one
everyone suffers from jesters entertainment
if I'm jester it's just evils who suffer
Jester should haunt innocent voters fr
you support town?
you can convince
I claim jester because it benefits me and the majority will help me
Jester when it haunts town, it sorta harms evils
but you can also betray them
how exactly?
yes but then they won't help me in the future
This might be entirely misinformation btw so take this with a massive grain of salt, but I heard from someone who played TOS 1 on basically launch day that Exe and Jester used to be Neutral Benign? Before witch was added?
it's called meta gaming
I do not know if this has any basis I can't find anything supporting that
They were NE
thats not true
NE apparently didn't exist at the very beginning according to them
Witch wasnt in the game in launch day? That's hard to believe
I don't get the appeal of jester betraying town
It is very likely just misinformation
Unless they're talking about some unreleased dev build, there has always been NE
cuz betraying is fun
you are not likely to meet the same players
also begging for jester win is lame
TOS isn't that big
Might be based on them being NB in SC2 Mafia or smth
Yeah this is why I have always been like,, most likely a lie. I can't find any documentation of this being a thing
they remove an evil
idk what to tell you
THIS WAS IT okay
yeah, but its not fun
Tbh they should let amne choose his role
they shouldn't not help you because they lose a tk shot
"it's not fun" mfw I won and am having fun gaining elo
I think one of the BMG devs literally helped make SC2 mafia btw which is why they are so similar
Number go up isn't too satisfying lol
I'm sure having fun losing because I claimed seer and got confirmed
Neutral benign = Survivor š¤®
I don't like neutrals anyways
I'd rather play the sdg
this is actually kinda funny
Jester best TI
neutrals have the issue of things being out of your control
Yeah that's why you're a neutral
btw this is the difference between me and you all
wasnt there like. barely any elo penalty for losing as NK in tos 1
And why you have defense
because playing neutral sucked
as someone who plays competitively, I try to win
simple
I don't play only to win
Neutrals are my favorite when they're exclusively anti-town "technically not the main evil faction"
you mean sk?
sk apposes town
And then you have inquisitor
He is
it's the third faction
Inquisitor targets evils too
it's literally just a one player faction
Inquisitor is a town role in disguise, change my mind
SK is a glorified soloist "faction"
Still a neutral
what do you think a neutral is
He literally is NK
Idk why the skull react this is true that NKs aren't actually neutral roles. It's just that "neutral" in tos means miscellaneous
It's the same with jester and doom
Lmao
Mfw town gets a free 2f0
Which is fucking stupid
do you think only ne is a neutral?
why the term gets misused a lot
like with my politician suggestion people were like "this isn't town because it swaps factions"
even though functionally it is...
How else would you call a soloist faction that doesn't have teammates other than neutral because neutral doesn't mean it can't be biased
Solo killing
It makes as much sense as "neutral killing" in aa
so
two solo killings is a duo killing fr
I mean NKs should try a lean into being unique and should be unique
Instead of hoping and praying you get double arso
is cs a neutral?
Me when town has to deal with 3 skinsuit sks
I will uninstall the game
literally only affects all any
Sure, but like you don't have evil games in AA with 3 mayors
cuz it breaks the game
Exactly
And 3 NKs don't?
There shouldnt be 2 of the same NK cuz it genuinely breaks the game
4 Shrouds is fair and balanced 
no i mean it literally breaks the game
Shroud is basically GF, change my mind
jailor doesnt work if its not unique
I don't think multiple Mayors would physically break the game, multiple Jailors would tho
it would mess with the TT list in an unhealthy way
multiple nk doent affect anything but all any
"they were killed by a bodyguard, they're role is bodyguard"
I guess that's the only difference
Along with trapper
Otherwise it basically godfather without a faction
But instead of sending Mafioso, you hope and pray a townie visits a person you actually want to kill
Shroud: Kill that guy
Townie: Who?
Shroud: idk whoever you're currently going to
Which is something people dont use because of the lack of agency the ability has
Otherwise you're literally godfather
speaking of detecting, why does detection immunity only screw over sheriff
why does it affect seer or psychic?
Because sheriff already finds 80% of evils with no questions asked
not
š it's different in tos:e
whats the difference
you can detect anything as sheriff...
...but only at different points
baseline, coven are immune to sheriff night 1 by default
but not NPs
Wym not? 3-4 covens, all apoc, NPs, NEs that's not jester (that's a good thing) and beta trickster
however, there exists counterplay to that too
Why the fuck was trickster sus at some point lmao
sus trickster?
because it gives sheriff something to do, you presumably would have to go up against deception anyways
was it coroner or what
This role might be strong, let's make it sus for no reason
letss give it to wretch
Yes trickster was found sus to sheriff's back in beta
For some reason
i assume vet was sus too
No
it was a different game in the beta
It was just trickster
pretty much
thats so random and inconsistent
Proactive BG was also a great mechanic
Like not to glorify the btos2 devs too hard but like, they got way too much hate when I think they saved tos2 š
what hate?
How tuba diverted too much from the game apparently
the game was only out for a year
some of the criticisms were like so stupid
When you had shit like proactive BG, the most skillfull role in the game
like the game is practically balanced by literal memes and now that they are gone they get upset
the tos1 mechanics werent even changed
That's why mayor had that draconian defense clause
who tf cares that you are discouraged from shooting day 2 just shut up
that was so braindead
Because doctor couldn't heal mayor in TOS1
wdym nostalgia over deputy
b- but.... my random shot š„ŗ
deputy got so much criticism
Btw random shooting is why vigi can't shoot n1
why not just let cleric be unable to protect mayor specifically
Because it's stupid
you mean after it got better?
I brought up pipetron because he shot day 2 a lot but like, I feel like people take what he says so seriously (then the devs said stop the slander)
"causal" players got mad you couldn't randomly shoot and either delete the NK or shoot a townie and get yourself hanged
some people think it's weak
but most of them only play aa
absolutely not
yeah it's like top 5 roles rn
The reason why dep was changed is the same reason why vigi can't shoot n1
for town
Hey, at least casual is actually not dead
yeah
Because people would random shoot, get it wrong, then leave
deputy somehow could shoot someone who didnt even have the chance the speak
I'm mostly tired of casual from btos2 but it's so much better
I think that "outliers" are kinda overrated but I get the casual appeal
like at least let them unable to shoot till voting
cultist is fine, CS is getting changed too to be more evil sided
Who would actually select dep
outliers is new so i understand
yeah well vigi is also up there in top 5 lmao
Idk just asking
vigi is like #4
also let the vigi reload mechanic be unaffected by roleblockers
Vigi should have to fire 1 bullet at a time tbh
dep is #5
tos:e
He has flintlock ffs
Vigilante should just be one shot
like i dont get why roleblocking stops reload when its a passive
Since when do flintlocks hold multiple bullets
casuals etc etc
No
Better deputy then lmao
I made it one shot in my rebalance
the vigi nerf is balanced
so that tks actually can be "common"
I love when I click a button then sit on my ass the whole game
vigi doesnt need another nerf
Mfw vigi can delete 3/4 of the coven
by d6
That's also stupid
d7
Shoot and then actually engage with the SDG?
You already engage with the SDG by shooting
Since you're already confirmed at least a killer
the pilgrim argument
No town role should "carry" a town
If you're not scum reading as vigi idk what you're doing... And scum reading is part taking in the SDG
Tpow...
I don't like tpow
also vigi is just a worse jailor
Jailor is just overtuned lol
Is that a bad thing?
not a bad thing but dont tell to nerf a role that is a worse verion of another
How do you nerf jailor (other than making him 2 exes) without taking the theme of the role away or just making him tav +
the best role in the game by a mile
My brother in Christ that's a TPOW
Jailor was TK back in TOS1
imagine tos1 jailor here
Jailor never loses his keys
a tk that doesnt lose executes
i mean ability to jail
Fresh gave me an idea for a Jailor/VIP hybrid mode where if the jailor dies, town loses. Jailor is still nerfed in that mode fyi.
It is
what if the VIP effect was silent
Wtf
like nobody knows the jailor
At that point why are you jailing
sk cam still jailbreak right?
to execute
You just become vigi
to kill
not in btos2
and roleblock the killer
Then you're just vigi
im talking about my own game
why not
that roleblocks
That only matters if it's book holder
Cuz you're not gonna tell me you're exited for RBing the illusionist
I donāt think you all realize how broken jailor is already
and illusionist isnāt in tos:e yet
since jailor is combination of vigi and tav they should spawn in both tk and ts
I am aware jailor is a bit overturned, but making him vigi+ or tav+ isn't a fix
JailIP
like I said, itās the only way I can think rn to add jailor
How about don't
I mean
I love self-confirming roles
Tavern is reworked because roleblocks are reworked
disruption is silent but can be chained
At least it has evil counterparts lmao
Add kidnapper instead of poisoner
So defensive abilities give less information
I see
Idk about chained disrupts though
because you can rb the book holder but another evil can claim to save someone
Chain rbs are so ass
Yeah because it doesn't matter if they are silent if you can never kill
fake rbers can exist
Me when NK
Me when I am Mafioso but I'm permanently jailed even if I lied about RBd
NKs arenāt a thing yet but they might just be rb immune
as they are designed to be strong
Me when I don't get to play the video game because someone decided to fuck me over
exorcist from botc
if you had hangover then it would be even weaker than it already is
so
I kinda don't like minstel, exorcist and lycanthrope
minstrel is fine imo
so is exo
lycanthrope is dumb though
the point of them is being a little strong
I don't like "You don't play this night, for evils"
in a game like botc you can get away with things not being perfectly fair
because the st can just choose to adjust things
as if no dashii isnāt the same thing
or drunk
or widow
Good isn't the same as evil
as if you canāt just āsocializeā your way into winning
Good is the SDG, evils get the abilities to deceive
In the late game you can cc exorcist
You or a minion can claim a different role that explains your situation
Good shouldn't have a hard "NO" evils
You can sink kills to limit information
okay so how is tav fair then
if exorcist isnāt
how is jailor fair
I don't like either of those roles from a design standpoint
I don't like hard "NO"s
The counterplay is that the tav doesnāt know you are evil other than by using context clues
Either way
we will need to see it tested
because rbers are going to be less trusted
What's better rn
4
4
1
Vigi
you be talking about anything but election
election would be cool if we used it for tt hunt or something
Because election genuinely sucks since if town gets elected they become a shittier mayor because they lose their ability for some reason and if an evil gets elected they become SS with a killing ability along their usual role, so town is discouraged on engaging with the gimmick because it rewards evils while punishing town
The reason townies lost their ability is so you have reason to elect people that arenāt just uber confirmed
Otherwise itād always go on the jailor or monarch or anything
but the trade off is SO BAD
You dont even gain votes
passively
You just get 2 and then you can tarnation off
passive gaining votes make the drawback for giving evils soverign so much worse
The evils dont lose their abilities
Town gets screwed over so much while evils have the best thing they can have
vote power
Okay so what if the town instead of voting somebody up to trial, they choose a sovereign, this sovereign now chooses to prosecute somebody
so now instead of tos1 mayor you now become a prosecutor
yes
no drawbacks
but you lose the prosecute the next day
and a person cannot be chosen twice in a row
so its like select the person you trust the most to make the correct decision
that could work
Evils need to keep their abilities or the game would just screech to a halt under certain circumstances
Ftr tho I'm not arguing that election is well designed, but the modifier also becomes kind of pointless if it's not designed properly
There needs to be some risk of actually electing an evil player, which with TOS being how it is can be very difficult when you'd have no reason not to just elect whoever is mechanically confirmed
oh and please ping when you are replying to me
I was just pointing out it was a way worse mayor
that evils could have
Election needs an overhaul, honestly.
The sovereign should have the exact same effects on both townies and evils. Why does it have to screw over townies, and hard benefit evils?
like talkative said, king from ToL could work
Ironically, yeah that would be cool
It's somehow something we don't have in ToS2, considering how much it has taken from ToL already
we only took inquisitor from there
#1426191794504208395 message
Ran with the idea
it makes mayor a role !