Gossiper(Neutral Pariah)

[candid grove]

Gossiper

Neutral Pariah
Attack: None
Defense: Eth Basic
Abilities:
Expose a player
Spread scandelous rumors

Expose(3)
Guess your targets role during the day
If you guess correctly, their role will be Exposed to all evils at the start of the night and any TP that visits them will not protect them for that night
You can only Expose Town roles

Scandal
Your target will appear as enemies+Suspicious to all Townies, appear friendly to all Evils and cannot appear in a Psychics Good vision
This effect is Dispelled at the start of the day upon being visited by a Town Investigative
If you try to Gossip about an Evil player, you will instead learn their role and real alignment

Attributes:
If all Town roles are dead, you will leave the town
You cannot guess the same player twice in a row
You dont use up charges on incorrect guesses

Why?

people been asking for a roleguessing np cuz of att so i did this

[sterile talon]

It doesn't fuck over Marshal's group lynch

[candid grove]

i mean do we need a third?

[sterile talon]

It's funny to have every np fuck over marshal

[candid grove]

that is true

[sterile talon]

I personally think the next np will get a ability to shorten the next day and only have 1 trial

[candid grove]

isnt that just a judge/death buff

cuz less time=more stress

meaning more chaos

meaning fast vote

[sterile talon]

Yeah

[fallow imp]

yes minstrel is based

we know

(it doesnt reduce day time so i dont know what thats from)

lemme read this

[sterile talon]

Sinner

[fallow imp]

whats that

[sterile talon]

Gabby's np

[fallow imp]

yeah sure i like this

i dont love anticlaim but BTOS2 has embraced it wholesale so why not double down

[candid grove]

oi this and my doom do it perfectly

[fallow imp]

People when VFR is a possibility and they actually have to plan a good claim (they cant just claim TP d2 and stay silent):

[candid grove]

ikr its not the claiming part thats the issue

its the voting bit

you shouldnt be using trials as free time

[autumn plank]

I like o7's Executioner as a fix for this

[candid grove]

#1200470432529268826 is a good example of countering vfr

[candid grove]

would you believe it if i said me and o7 have the exact same jester and exe

[fallow imp]

we dont need to counter vfr

[candid grove]

we do

[fallow imp]

this is a personal opinion and i fully get if people disagree, but claiming is healthy

[candid grove]

vfr and tplo are problems

[candid grove]

it is healthy

[fallow imp]

those are two very different problems that are solved in very different ways

TPLO is definitely a problem

VFR isnt

[candid grove]

but freely pressuring someone using votes isnt a good thing

vft and the voting part of vfr are the issue

[fallow imp]

fair enough

but i dont think people will really claim unless pressured with votes

thats a playerbase issue and not a game issue so you cant really fix it

[candid grove]

they will claim in their own time or if towns willing to kill them

if you got so scummy that towns willing to risk exe to get you

thats on u

[fallow imp]

im an avid proponent of massclaim even when there's a possibility of a ritualist

[candid grove]

i despise mass claim

vfa or vfr i hate it

[fallow imp]

my question is how you counter the vote part of VFR without also countering the claim part

[candid grove]

#1200470432529268826

[fallow imp]

without unbalanced NEs

but i will read it

[candid grove]

my ne reworks arent unbalanced