Limit Snipers per team + only equal Snipers in each team

[nova violet]

Dont hate me, just an idea:
How about a team can only have maybe 2 snipers max and only the same amount as snipers as the other team.
So if one team only has one sniper then the other team can have only one sniper?
Or it depends on the amounts of the players.
Like 4 player teams = 1 Sniper
7 player teams = 2 snipers
10 player teams = mores snipers?

[lyric turret]

I feel that would severely complicate matchmaking and the lobby system

[nova violet]

Depends how they plan to do matchmaking, in League of Legends different classes work too.

[raw bane]

6v6 each person has a different class

[merry hawk]

Definitely

So many little things that would have to be added

[nova violet]

I agree, but even tho I play mainly sniper, I feel like the players in lobbys complain the most about sniper players.

Yesterday we had a game and decided no snipers or little amount of snipers and the game was more fun for each.

[cursive laurel]

People can just switch lobbies if they don‘t like their current one.
But I prefer to be able to play with friends who all play sniper.

[lyric turret]

instead of a game where one of the main mechanics is preplanning a locked in roster, let's bring it back to an example a lot more comparable
overwatch, a game designed around swapping heroes, had hero bans for like less than a month and then dropped it
lost my train of thought from bringing that up but anyways, the main audience draw of krunker strike is from how uncomplicated it is
things like adding new gamemodes to accommodate structured class play would have a pretty big trade-off in that regard, and I assume that there's big incentive to make everything added as simple as possible
like, if you see krunker.io, you'd immediately be able to tell that the two are polar opposites in regards to how they want people to play the game.
krunker strike wants everyone to just be able to press the big play button and start immediately, while .io wants the player to be in control of every setting, even if it makes it too complicated for beginners
I do agree that controlling sniper use was pretty fun but when it comes down to it, things to control sniper use on the game's end faces challenge from all sides, be it lobby system, gamemodes, how attention retention is designed, and the fact that sniper is probably a pretty large incentive for people to crack open their wallets for the game

tl;dr idk what I'm talking about, I was just typing words

[cursive laurel]

I mean you‘re very much right with it and that‘s a large point that most people miss, but referring to this suggestion you’re basically saying no, because it makes things more complicated and makes sniper playing a little less attractive thus decreasing the value for it and thus being bad for the business?

[deep forge]

Yes

[cursive laurel]

I was asking them

[deep forge]

Krunker dc is just a game you press start and have fun

[cursive laurel]

I mean technically if you make the matchmaking in the background you still would just have to press play.
However there are enough people who actually enjoy playing against a lot of snipers.
And like I said, if you don’t like your current lobby because of too many sniper players, just switch lobbies.

[nova violet]

Snipers enjoy playing against snipers, I see that.

I never ever heard other players saying "nice lots of snipers in that server"

[lyric turret]

how I see it is that it's kinda like playing jenga with it to make it work
like, if role matchmaking is a thing, there would then need to be a system designed to lock players from switching while they're in that lobby
and also having to think about if that would be a separate matchmaking pool from the loose team deathmatch we have now, and if that would impact the player population too drastically
tbh idk why I'm even trying to take the dev pov when it's just, they'll do it if they want to and won't if they can't

[cursive laurel]

So what?
They can just join another lobby - I really don‘t see the problem.
But why remove the option for those who enjoy it? And that‘s certainly more than just me ;)

[cursive laurel]

okay hold on, these are actually two suggestions in one - I was just talking about limiting the overall number of snipers per lobby for the other one absolutely, that would be an impact if you couldn‘t switch teams.

[feral barn]

For my opinion bcoz I'm not sniper user but u all stop using sniper coz it's unfair

[deep forge]

And btw what if I and my friends play all with sniper can one guy just not join through the join friend menu or are there then just 3 sniper instead of the limit of two

[lyric turret]

I felt that there's a lot of precursor things to be set before a system that sets sniper limits can function

so it was hard for me to be concise

[severe ridge]

There’s should be no reason to mess with the functionality in terms of this aspect in my opinion.

[blissful verge]

I love playing against them personally, they’re easier to kill 🤷🏻‍♂️

[sudden schooner]

As a sniper I never really saw an issue with this, esp cus a lot of snipers game hop. Plenty of snipers suck and we're really easy to kill if you're any good at the game, so it's not necessarily like you're limiting the most OP players and making the game more fair. Plus I just think of how overwatch did this so that people were forced to be healers and how wait times for matches could get insane because of it. Let's not raise the ~30 second wait time between matches if we can help it.

[wise river]

SINN JUMPSCARE

I’ve only had an “out of hand” amount of snipers on the opposite team like once it’s not that common at all for me to see any more than 2 per match

[sudden schooner]

Exactly

[merry hawk]

ong

[hybrid cargo]

You are right, snipers already have one shot kill advantage and sometimes matchmaking gives three snipers on one side and another none or one, all three snipers either block all paths or gangs up together at a spot facing different directions, switching teams doesn't help, it makes previous team more weaker, more than four snipers in a lobby irrespective of matchmaking scenario ruins the game for non-sniper players, their gameplay becomes going and get killed instantly or be called out for "hiding" in the chat.

[cursive laurel]

I also enjoy playing against several snipers with a non-sniper
No need to remove that, everyone who doesn‘t like it, always has the possibility to switch lobbies (or on this server switch voice channels).

They could try to make the team match making a bit better so that snipers are more distributed.
However, from what I‘ve experienced that‘s already almost always the case.

[wise river]

so real

[hybrid cargo]

You know how hard is to get a lobby with good players together, right? There aren't multiple active vc channels at the same time on this server either.

[cursive laurel]

And that is why you just want to limit it so that the people cannot play together anymore?
Doesn't make sense to me.
And it just depends, there are several used voice channels often enough - just join one and more will follow.

[sleek cape]

Adds some sort of complicated matchmaking / role queue, otherwise might run into games where players must rush to lock in sniper. Regardless, it's a hypercasual (and ptw) game, so this will not be implemented nor does it make sense to be implemented

A class cap makes better sense in a competitive setting, which will likely never happen for this game

[sudden schooner]

Preaching to the choir (I'm the choir)

[sudden schooner]

This too

[lyric turret]

this words it perfectly

[severe ridge]

Agreed. I can’t envision this being implemented because sniper is after all the “premier class”