#Formula One
1 messages · Page 12 of 1
Lol he got into russels head, what a dick move
Very very nice
Crikey!
He should’ve let Lewis through if he was gonna suck there at the end
Lego horsies
The sigh
I feel bad for russell
Jesus
SMOOOOOTHHH OPERATORRRR
Best race this season by far
😭
ngl without leclerc i doubt he would win 100%
Russell fucking devastated
Russell’s brakes on fire
i feel so bad for russell
When was the last time someone DNFed on the last lap
Podium for Hamilton but it really sucks it had to be this way
Not to mention Merc lost an opportunity for a bunch of points
Russell should’ve sucked less
NO MAX PODCAST EPISODE
VAMOSSS
Win at slowest possible speed Kollo
P1 FOR THE SCUDERIA BAYBEEEEE
Max led 0% of laps that race. He's washed

🐴 🐴🐴
essere ferrerere 

lets hope redbull stays like this for the rest of the year🥰🥰
BRUH SPANISH ANTHEM
OMG
For the first time
they wont, its just the track
fuck off
i know but im delulu
Being delulu is the solulu
lets gooo

Hamilton shut up
Preach
It’s not Hamilton’s fault he could see the wall unlike Russell smh
God please let Red Bull be like this the rest of the season
russell why are u following lando
NO MAX PODCAST

Kmag even got ooints
Omg how do u feel
What was that ending
A wild one
This week on the podcast, all guests no host.
I feel a dts mercedes episode of this race coming up
BUT LIKE GEORGE HITTING THE WALL
SLOWMO
AND THEN SILENCE
Cut to the driver swearing
Thats every crash in dts
Netflix would somehow made it like that that it looks that rb had a terrible season
YES
THEY ALWAYS TWIST THINGS
omg imma go listen to the spanish anthem
NO MAXPLAINING
so weird
For the first time this year, we won't hear the Austrian anthem
so happy

Italian anthem time soon
For the first time in 10 GPs, we won't hear the Dutch anthem
Carlos nailing those lyrics for the anthem
goodbye formula 1, was nice while it lasted
Spanish anthem >>>> dutch
Italian best out of all
yup
Look at Ferrari mechanics out there with Italian flags lol
ITALIAN ANTHEM IS SO MUCH BETTER
With the wall? Sure
Omg carlando podium
yeah next week
Idk what is his problem with that wall
see you there
YUSS LANDO
Ye he’ll hit the wall, oh wait
Why do they sometimes give medals and a trophy
Do they have medals now?
Cant wait for piastris car to get the updates
DIFF ANTHEM?!?!
Medals have been a thing for winners since Abu Dhabi 2022.
i want to hear leclerc
Fred looks so happeh omg
Of course he does. It’s his first win as team principal.
i just wanna hear his "it's a shame, but yeah i'll push in the next race, congrats to carlos and yeah..hopefully i'll get more points next time"
what a nice day, huh?what do you mean singapore gp? that never happened
STROLL
Im never forgetting this day
SHOULD BE WRITTEN IN THE HISTORY BOOK
smooooth operatorrrr
Liam getting points fucking crazy
@fallow thistle
The Cool-down Room podcast with Max will return at a later date 😅
13917
1548
LMAO
why is his name like that
STROLL
How many of you will sleep through the next race weekend? 😂
japan race is gonna be 8 am for me

last year i was at the airport when the race was so i could just wathc it ther
still sunday no plans anywyas
Kart I will be sleeping
depends on your definition of good
well lewis came third
russell gave me so much depression that i forgot lewis actually had a great race 😭😭
200 podiums soon ✅
meh i don’t really like george too much but crashing out on the final lap on third is just devastating
dunno why people keep saying if george had let lewis through he would’ve won
merc fans always try to blame george its crazy
😍
I think a lot of people will be sleeping. 😂
I‘ll sleep through practice sessions 1 and 3 for sure.
who is awake watching them anyway
thats quite the dedication
That’s what happens when one follows the sport for more than 15-16 years.
damn, i started watching around 2014
it’s because george is so dislikeable
but people like lewis
i used to think the opposite.
i hated lewis because of his domination and loved george cause he was the underdog in a bad car
george probably said the barrier turned into him today
it was pressure
i think lewis just has a likeable personality
it’s more he’s known for saying everyone turned into him 😂
fernando is very likeable this season
george definitely knows it was his own mistake
everyone makes mistakes
leclerc always does it yet he still gets praised all the time
very overrated driver
depending on how red bull performs at suzuka, george has his scope aimed at that race win
A lot of Europeans
Just Ferrari being shit that's all
they won a gp today you know
I watched the race but let's not act like they're consistent, and people acting like sainz is better than leclerc are insane 😭
in times of verstappen winning 10 races in a row. that win is insane
Real
alonso made me a bit sad
Yeah also ocon and george, they had a great race taken away from them
waiting for alonso to win a gp. he was very close couple times
george was very promising before he joined merc. dont know what happened
One of the worst races for Aston Martin ngl, they're the most promising team too
i dont know about lance tho.
Yeah i don't know what happened, he had one of the best races when he raced for them before bottas left. We all thought he'd even replace lewis 💀
he was killer in the 2020 sakhir gp. until the team f'd it up
Lance isn't going anywhere unfortunately unless there's some scandal going around like what happened with force india
i think merc focused on getting lewis winning again that they forgot about george
the public outcry is gonna overtake one day
I mean i know it's crazy to say but having a main driver and a 2nd driver is better than treating them equally
Also the fact George is still new to merc, idk why they'd let him become the main driver
Maybe
they thought lewis was locked in for the 2021 championship, and then george is gonna be fighting like lewis and nico. but verstappen changed everything
happened with haas
Except mazepin's dad was only an investor, i think stroll's dad owns the team but im not sure
mazepin's dad was the only thing keeping haas alive. just like lance's father
Haas almost went bankrupt at one point 😭😭😭
ford, chevy or dodge should take over haas as the american entry in f1
Kinda crazy how they went from topping the midfield to the bottom of the standings
Ford for sure, idk about the rest
chevy is deep in racing history
Im more excited about porsche tbh
audi coming to sweep everything
Def but ford got a rich history too
They need to add more teams tbh
20 cars is good, but the cars are too big for the tracks today
Yeah but imagine 24
monaco would be a demolition derby
I mean there are races with 60 cars in them
these cars are 1/3 the size of f1 cars
Monaco is already a mess 😭😭😭
Still there's a lot of cars there
More teams good
yeah. but they are not going 4 wide in a 2 wide corner like f1. and the speeds are lower
My only concern with more teams is that the current timing tower I think is in its perfect state
If we had 24 on the grid, the text would become too small or we wouldn't be able to see everyone all at once anymore
unless the current teams start getting faster and not letting redbull run with it. the current grid is ok
imagine 24 cars in monaco. undrivable
street circuts will be worse tho
and first lap pileups will be frequent
They already are frequent
multiply x2 with 24 cars
Idk man, sounds like the best drivers in the world should learn to maintain space
there is no space. the cars were wheel to wheel today. the cars are too big for the tracks
make em smaller than think about adding more cars
It will also create more battles and increase competition
"My car is too big, i have to be wheel to wheel"
its true
max and lewis in the 2021 british gp is proof that 2 cars cant take a turn together
sorry for the mistake. i meant the italian gp
This one? This doesn't sell me at all. It looks like Max and Lewis just disagreed on who takes which line.
Idk that Monza chicane is fucky also Lewis definitely didn't leave enough space
max always goes for the turn knowing 50/50 that he is gonna crash
he expects them to back off
Sounds more like a Max issue and less of a car big issue then.
they both know that the cars are too big to go together
they choose to do it either way
Would be way funnier if more cars were on the grid just to fuck over Max 50/50s assuming he isn't 40s clear
more backmarkers is just what f1 needs
didnt they turn penske down cause of that
At least we'll have more battles in the lower ranks cause it's so fucking boring at the top now
The fact there are 10 minute compilations of hamilton doing this sort of stuff 💀
battling for 10th place is not what the sport needs currently
we want podium battles like today
Okay but like no one wants ballasts
Sometimes, someone just gaps the rest
I don't see why suddenly we gatekeep orgs that wanna try from the grid
haas and aston martin need to go in favor of people like ford and audi
If people want to leave, they can leave. If people want to join, they can join. If the latter results in a 24-car grid, I see no issue.
f1 orgs want competitive racing not people who fight in 10th place and under
thats why they kept it to 20
I mean part of it is their fault. It's their fault the system doesn't reward anything below P10.
Yuki would have had a way better season thus far if the points better reflected the performance of the bottom half.
the system is good. if you finish below 10th you dont deserve points
Hard disagree. Points are a vehicle to measure the relative performance of teams from one another.
Keep aston martin and remove these b teams like alpha tauri
Having no distinction between P11 and P19 reflected in points is absurd.
if you want better racing you better award until like p15
if they qualify 19th why should we reward them
you'd get much more intense fights
Having a team get P11 and P12 every race versus a team that's consistently P19 and P20 both end up tied in Constructors is absurd.
we already have sprints and fastest laps to give points and they still cant get them
but just because you dont 'deserve' them you shouldnt get them
basically what youre saying is that if you are a like p15 team on a reg basis you are just dogshit and have to benifit from others failing
if 10th and under get points. a lot of bad drivers will seem better than they actually are like lance. thats just not the truth
Points are a vehicle to measure the relative performance of teams from one another.
Points are not real. They should be used as a tool to figure out if A is better than B. Lumping an entire staff that consistently outperforms another team but displaying them in a scoreboard as tied just because you decided a cutoff was at 10th is not it.
top 10 points are not a new thing, its just f1 have stopped teams from innovating and teams no longer fight for points
I don't care if someone gets 6 points because points are not real. It's how those points contribute to the relative standing.
that was not the case 10 years ago
Teams don't fight for points because half the grid by definition can't get any
Like the top 10 spots go to 6 teams, the other 4 just have no chance so they're all in a bracket of 7-10th because as far as the point system is concerned, we don't care about their placement
if they cant qualify in the top 10 why do you want to reward them for that
You mean decrease it to p5? Because there wont be any competition if 3/4 gets points
it is . its a reward for the driving and strategy of each team
If Alpine is shit all year and gets bottom two every time and AlphaTauri gets P11/P12 every time, as far as the FIA is concerned, they're both equally garbage.

basically what would happen if you have points till p15
And in my mind, that's just not it
is that people outside the top 10 where it wouldnt matter if you finish 11th or 19th bc same reward would fight more for their positions so it would technically improve racing
Like an onlooker just looks at the Constructors Points and it's only a good story for the Top 5 teams
bad planning by teams has screwed a lot of drivers out of points. its not the fia problem to give them points for their screw ups
But for the Bottom 5 teams it's just RNG
My dude
Again
Points in my mind are not a reward
It's a measuring stick for performance
if you're kimi its a reward
And the fact F1 just doesn't care below P10 is just so absurd to me
its a reward that differences upon the driver's performance in a race
top 10 has become copy and paste in the last couple of years
If teams didn't have sponsorship obligations, I bet the backmarker teams would retire with 20 laps still to go from P13 down
Maybe even earlier
Cause really what's the risk-rewaed. You're getting literally nothing anyway. You're gonna sacrifice 5% of your Car's Durability for a 1-in-10000 chance you'll get a penultimate lap Red Flag?
thats racing. nothing is for granted
and racing was never cheap and youre not always gonna win
The points stopping at P10 is bad game design.
I will die on this hill.
I won't stop using my example cause it illustrates what I feel best.
AlphaTauri can be P11/P12 the entire season. Alpine is P13/P14 the entire season. Alfa Romeo is P15/P16 all season. Williams is P17/P18 all season. Finally, Haas always bottoms out at P19/P20 all season. Some miracle happens and Nico finished P10 in Qatar or some shit.
The Constructors rankings put Haas as the 6th Constructor with 1 point.
The fact it can be that way is bullshit.
they had 22 races to finish in the top 10. why didnt they
You miss the point
AT gaps Haas the entire year but because who gives a shit about going below P10 they just don't get represented. Because of an arbitrary cutoff of observation of finishing position after 10.
can you write the points for p10 and under
50, 40, 35, 30, 26, 22, 18, 14, 12, 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, 1, 0
first place 50 points meaning. that a 2-3 race slump could eliminate you from champ contention
alonso wouldnt be close verstappen if the points were like that
Probably the worst thing to happen to f1 if they gave points to anyone below p10
how 💀
not like he's close anyways lmao
if this makes me wrong. i dont wanna be right
Points awarded to drivers who haven't performed well will decrease competition
he's close
Hi
what you dont understand i think is that points will get less value if you can earn more of them in a weekend 💀
consistant p2-3 for alonso is beyond his wildest dreams
There's a severe disconnect between me and other F1 fans
I don't care about points as a concept
How
I care about them relative to how many points other people have
HOW
194 points is so close omg
Which is what I thought people cared about
completely defeats the point of the point system
they dont just hand points out to everyone
you have to earn them
that means that 1 dnf is gonna eliminate you from the champ
Why would you decrease the value of points? This is like a country devaluing their currency 💀
less points make it better to close the gap
Liam has more points than Logan, Nyck and Daniel😭😭😭. So maybe @fallow thistle Has a point
p11
Because the current rules say they're the same picture.
what would it matter tbh
it looks better to the team not that it offers points
So why don't we like y'know...codify it? Reward doing better?
apparently if you finish p11 or lower you're shit 
This is really different though, because being at p11 meant you were fighting for p10 which earns you a point
'finish'
p11 means youre fighting for points. p19 means youre dead
in fact you basically fought hard for point but got nothing in the end 💀
Exactly
I'm so confused by that train of logic
if we reward p10 under. they are gonna play it safe knowing they are getting points anyway
you're gonna fight bc you want more
Guys...

What if I told you the points don't matter but what matters is you get more points
You wanna know why people fight for P10 it's cause 1 point is more than 0
Why people fight for P6 instead of settle for P7? It's cause P6 earns 2 more points or whatever it is.
me when math 😱😱😱
But why give a fuck about fighting for P17 when you're P18 when it's the same shit different night
That's what I don't get about "deserve points"
Because to me
What matters isn't the points themselves. It's how much you're getting over other teams
So if you're consistently the 6th best and doing P11 and P12, I don't think it's fair you should be tied in Constructors with a team consistently P19 and P20
Is that really such a crazy perspective for me to have?
Teams never settle
Someone in P10 still fights for P9 if they can make it because that's one whole extra point denying from another team
It's a two point swing
This makes no sense at all. A lot of drivers get penalized and start at the back of the grid and still fight for points. So it's not entirely impossible. I do think that the current system is perfect because teams will try their best to improve their cars to earn those points. If you devalue the points, a driver in p18 would want to end up in p17 instead of p10.
Points are a joint measurement of who's the better driver and constructor. The fact you just close your eyes after half have crossed the line is absolutely crazy to me.
Why would anyone care about the battles at the back of the grid instead of the front/mid of the grid 😭😭😭
I really wish I was clever enough to make the argument that all the current arguments against expanding points can be extended or contracted to any arbitrary point cutoff.
Like why not just stop giving out points after the podium
Or after P5
Because all the logic carries over
we can do that if we have a 10 car grid
Because only 3 teams will earn points and the rest will end up in 0. We won't know the difference between the mid and the bad teams
We give P10 points. A driver in P10 would want to end up in P9 instead of P3 and such and such to that effect
McLaren would be the same as haas if only p1-p5 earn points
Why do we care about the differences of some of teams and not just all of the teams then?
Is it just me that wants to know if AT are actually gapping Alfa Romeo?
Like why do we only allow such a narrative to only apply to the midfield and up?
But not extend that to the whole grid?
Why not more accurately place the grid in terms of their actual performance over the year?
Please see where I'm coming at
The midfield exists in part because of where the points cut off.
Right now Mercs are 2nd in Constructors because the point system currently reflects that over the season so far, they are doing best behind Red Bull. Because we have the numbers for Merc, we can say that. I'm happy saying that. We saw the podiums the P4s the P6s the P8s. It's all accounted for.
But for a team like AlphaTauri. Their finishes no matter how high they are are just not accounted for until it crosses P10
I just don't think that's fair
Okay so we have 3 teams that fight for the championship, 5 teams that are in the midfield and 2 teams that barely get 1 point. Whether you give p15 a point or not, the standing remains almost the same. The only difference would be that these teams wont try to improve and end up in the top half, instead fight for p15. Not everyone needs to get a point, the system is perfectly fine.
And if only the top 5 cars earn a point, there would be no midfield which ruins the race.
I take particular issue with that "instead fight for P15." It's so disheartening sometimes to see in some races a graphic like "Battle for 12th" and "Battle for 16th." They clearly are still in it for track position but for no points. The drive of competition is there. Why not incentivize that more? What's so wrong for encouraging more fights towards the back? I also again would like to reiterate that the argument works for any arbitrary cutoff in points. In this case: "Teams in P6-10 won't improve and try to get the point-awarding top 5 positions. Instead they'll just fight for P10. Not everyone needs to get points"
We give a sliding scale of points from P1-P10 yet we don't see settling, do we? And it has nonuniform gaps to offset the risk of pushing by rewarding more points. I see no reason why the logic breaks down after an arbitrary cutoff like P10
Do points not exist because there's value in keeping track of how many times you finished in a certain position and how much we should weigh finishing in one position over the other? If so, why do we just stop doing that at a certain point? Why is it that the consistency and performance metric we call points is so rigorously checked and balanced for the Top 5 constructors and just shunted for the rest and instead for them it's a gamble? At the top it's a game of gains and losses and at the back, it's just sending it despite all but maybe one or two drivers out of ten even getting a single whiff with no distinguishing between getting close and being unimaginably far.
I mean this graphic rarely happens and it's usually for drivers who usually end up in the points zone. What difference will it make if you gave p16 a point just to feel good about it? It would only make the p16 driver look better than he is. As for the p5 argument, it would be merc and red bull getting these points with the occasional Ferrari/McLaren/whatever. This would be extremely unfair, especially since we have 20 cars on the grid. 80% of them wont have points and the standings would look weird. I do think that points should have a value instead of giving them away for free because it would create more battles to end up in the first half of the grid.
I fundamentally do not see points as awards. They are metrics of performance.
If I asked absolutely anyone if they would rather finished P12 or P20, they know finishing P12 is better but as far as the standings are concerned. They are the same thing.
If we're using points as metrics of performance, we would think that george is a bad driver during his time at williams
There's no acknowledgement for being better than 4 other constructors per se.
I don't see how that's an argument in favor of keeping the system that doesn't recognize doing better than almost half the grid.
Because the current system would let us know that williams aren't as good as let's say alpine
And how so?
Because alpine race in the first half of the grid more often than williams
And if let's say alpine dnf more frequently than williams
If we're using the "everyone gets a point" system, it would make Williams look better than they are
I mean, would it not also befall on Alpine that they DNF so often because of drivers/reliability/strategy that they are at least in part looking better than they should?
Like I understand where you're coming from
But that's a good point that there's a balance between finishing good and finishing at all
But in the end, that's racing. We didn't knock on Merc just now with George crashing that everyone below him got bumped up a position?
Williams would passively collect points, even if they do shit every race. Alpine would still lose out on the points but it would make alpine and williams closer than they actually are.
I mean, that's the reason for the sliding scale, isn't it? Alpine being better and getting finishes would offset bad performances from Williams that still gain points
Moreover, is this not like Ferrari in the past few years? They've had a car and driver comparable to Red Bull last year and were marred with crashes and reliability
Which allowed Red Bull to clinch as early as Suzuka
Would that not say "Oh, the crashes of Ferrari made Red Bull look better than they actually are?"
In a way, yes
But that comes with the territory
We allow that for the top but it's suddenly not allowed for the middle and back?
Like hey, if you weren't crashing so much last year, Ferrari you would've put up a fight. The same can be said for this Williams/Alpine situation. If you stopped being XYZ, you would've looked better.
I get it's sort of different because Red Bull/Ferrari at least was a championship fight but isn't the point of things like the midfield to be excited for battles for 4th? Battles for 6th? Why not extend that to battles towards the back?
Except williams would think they're as fast as alpine, which is incorrect. It won't create more competition, it creates less competition because williams and alpine are close in points even though williams are doing terribly. With the Ferrari example, it's perfect because we know how close/far they are from the championship. You can't say the same if we gave everyone a point, especially at the back of the grid.
More opportunities for movement. And again, it's a sliding scale. You don't see people in the midfield "passively" collecting points to move up to the Championship winner tier
Because the gap between getting points from P5-10 are so little compared to P1-4
If you do the same for P11 and below what really is the concern?
The points scale down the lower you go
The effect is only really felt if you're in similar tiers
The gap between say current year Aston Martin and Williams just wouldn't be felt but at least you can distinguish between Williams and Alfa Romeo better
But again because there's no recognition between the backmarkers, you wouldn't actually know who is doing best in that tier of competition
We care about who's doing best among the midfield. How do we do that? In part, points. But the backmarkers? It's just feel and whoever gets lucky for the most part of who clinches a P10 and up finish
Hell, points makes the midfield feel like it matters because although they can't get podiums and constructors podiums, they're still indirectly fighting one another for points where every position is another chance to move up because it's a multi-point swing for every overtake.
But if you're P17, there is no such change in the standings.
Do 4 overtakes, there is nothing. Might as well have saved the parts durability and cruised.
Now that, to me, is settling.
I mean if a driver is getting points, they're doing well in a race. I dont know why a driver at p20 deserves to earn a point. About the distinguishing between alfa romeo and williams, i dont know how this would improve the races. It's not like people care if we gave them a point or not, it would simply make them look better and make it harder to distinguish between the teams in the mid and the back.
Track position means you're doing well in a race. We live in a world where getting 1 point is a "reward" but to me, it should be that getting 1 point is garbage because you should've fought for more. It's not about the points themselves. It's how many points you're getting relative to the other teams. Getting 25 points in of itself doesn't matter when winning a GP, what matters is that you extend your lead/close your gap by at least 8 points. Again, I fundamentally do not see points as a reward. They are a metric to determine who is the better driver/constructor over a season. Points define the midfield order. Do we confuse the Championship Contenders and the Midfield? If not, then we can extend the points downwards so we can better define the Backmarker order.
The points for the midfield are little that we are not confused as to who is in what tier. An extended points system would just define the order of the backmarkers better instead of just a blob of zeroes and ones.
That's why there's a big jump from p1 and p4
YEAH SO WHY NOT JUST A BIG JUMP FROM P10 TO 11
What's the point 😭😭😭😭
So the order of the backmarkers can be well-defined.
You mentioned that if the midfield wasn't awarded points it would suck because they deserve the recognition, no?
It's nice to know who's doing good in the midfield and who's doing bad in the midfield
I mean it's not like we don't know who the backmarkers are and the difference between them 😭
It's a good side show aside from the championship
Why not also grant the backmarkers that?
Yeah but people talk about these teams, no one cares about the backmarkers. That's why only the top 10 earn points, it's an incentive for the backmarkers to try and be better than half of the grid
Maybe I'm exaggerating
But you get the point
No pun intended
How do we know that this isn't a chicken and egg problem
No one cares because there's no points. There's no points because no one cares.
Why does the Midfield matter? I postulate it's because we keep track of the midfield.
Suppose we gave them points, do people still care about the battles at the back of the grid? It would only be annoying to watch these battles because now they're fighting for more points instead of watching the front/mid grid
Hear me out
Are we really watching fights 100% of the time in a GP?
No, half the time we're waiting for a battle to happen even if the observers are good.
That's why we sometimes get Battle for 14th Graphics
There's literally nothing else on the track that's interesting
So why not up the stakes and maybe reduce downtime
By having the back battle for points
We also have multiple battles happening on the grid semioften. Do you really think they're going to cut away from a Battle for 2nd to look at a Battle for 14th?
Because teams in the midfield like mclaren constantly improve, they became 3rd too.
Damn why didn't they settle for their points
They could've just battled for P4 or P5
You see how it doesn't make sense for me?
Like, if they want to improve, they will
That's the idea though, points have more value and it's an incentive for teams to get them
I'm saying that why do backmarker teams suddenly are being assumed to want to settle if they're getting free points if the midfield are actually getting those free points yet teams like Aston Martin or McLaren exist that are scratching at the higher tier
If everyone earns a point, it doesn't matter as long as you're getting more points. If you only make the top half earn points, teams will try their best to end up in the top 10
I don't understand it
So are you saying McLaren, Aston Martin, and Alpine don't care to end up in Top 5?
They earn points. It doesn't matter that they're getting more points, no?
This is what I don't get. The situation you're describing already exists and it doesn't work.
The system works perfectly fine though, I don't know why you're trying to make battles at the back of the grid "more exciting"
Let me go back to my original point.
Im doing all these side points because I'm appealing to what matters to you
But really I only care mostly for one thing
AlphaTauri can be P11/P12 the entire season. Alpine is P13/P14 the entire season. Alfa Romeo is P15/P16 all season. Williams is P17/P18 all season. Finally, Haas always bottoms out at P19/P20 all season. Some miracle happens and Nico finished P10 in Qatar or some shit. The Constructors rankings put Haas as the 6th Constructor with 1 point.
It's hyperbolic but the fact the system is blind to the difference between P11 and P20 just doesn't sit right with me.
Except this is extremely rare for alpha tauri to always end up in p11/12 and so on. A lot of the midfield teams fight it out to earn points. It's only the teams like williams and haas who rarely get points.
All the other stuff I've talked about are added justifications and in my opinion benefits to expanding the points
I get that it's a hyperbolic hypothetical
But it's to illustrate my particular issue with how P11 and P20 are treated as the same
I'll ask anyone in the world "Hey if you finished 11th in a race and 20th in a race, who did better?"
100% of the time, they'll say finishing P11.
But as far as the rules are concerned
They are the same.
(I know best placements are used as a tiebreaker at the end of the season but that's dumb as hell. It's almost a selfadmission that these placements mean something but they're too cowardly to expand the point system)
I honestly fail to understand how this wouldn't decrease the competition. There are a lot of ways to increase the competition like adding more teams, increasing the point gap between p1 and p2 and so on, etc. Giving everyone a point is kinda useless and it won't make the backmarkers more interesting to watch, it only makes them look better than they are.
It's not the points that matter. It's the ranking.
Allowing P11 to P20 to order themselves using points instead of a flat 0
I don't see how that's not just better.
I mean if we added more teams, it would make sense to increase the slider. As for now, it works just fine tbh
The more teams that don't get any points, the worse this problem is going to get.
You're just giving them a point for participation tho
I don't think this is a proportional issue. I think it's an absolute number issue. If we had a 24-car grid, 12 cars getting zilch every GP is worse than 10 cars despite being proportionally the same.
So?
Again
I don't give a shit about the points themselves
I care about the rankings.
The points determine the rankings.
If P23 gives 1 point, is that participation? Sure? But like, it's there to signify they're not last.
Would you be confused if you looked at the current standings and say "idk if this driver is better or not"
I think the standings are accurate for the Top 8
Maybe even top 10
Drivers
But below that, it's just RNG
Who had the stars align
It's not though???
The drivers that end up last have consistently been there every season
And the drivers at the lower midfield are equally good
That's why it looks "rng"
Same with the constructors
It remains consistent every year
Yuki has finished above P12 and above 7 times this year. Bottas 8 times this year. Nico twice this year. Guess which of these three are the highest in Drivers right now
Regardless, this is still beside the point. I want granularity for the backmarkers. Midfield placement is a mix of consistency and starshots. Backmarker placement are just starshots. A P16/17 team can have the stars line up and grant you a P7 and use that finishto coast through half the season
I mean it's a fun idea to play around with, but i do suppose it ruins the image of f1 being this extremely competitive racing sport with harsh results for drivers who didnt do better than half the grid.
It's kinda interesting if we ran the stats on the bottom grid and see how big of a difference it makes
As someone relatively new to the sport, it is harsh but like...that's not an image. That's just a quirk. And I say it's a quirk that damages a bit of the fun.
If I was a Haas fan, I'd be cheering for every gained place
But imagine the wall of bricks that hit when you learn that the gained place means nothing in terms of season ranking unless it's 10th or up
I mean sure each GP is it's each individual thing
But why deprive us of that?
I still find it weird how haas went from competing for the championship to the worst team on the grid
When I see Albon move from P9 to P8, I'm hype as fuck
But when I see Albon move from P13 to P12, I'm like "Cool, I hope he does that shit two more times."
I get that expanding the points makes the celebration for making it into the points meaningless
It would be more exciting to see albon in the top 10 instead of getting that participation point ngl
I'll say it again
The point itself is meaningless
What matters is you're closing a gap or extending a lead
The points are a vehicle to rank the drivers and constructors.
And you're right, it would be more exciting
But why deprive backmarkers even some excitement from gaining a tenth of a point
I get that you want the points system to work as a metric but to get to the original point, it decreases the competitive nature of f1.
I disagree
Settling is knowing you have 8 cars in front of you and passing 7 of them still means 0 fucking points
Sure, you can be like "Oh the team will strive to do better next time" well yeah but now I have to watch this shit for two hours
No wonder you don't cover it on cam, it's cause it's pointless
It's a chicken and egg
No one cares cause it's not worth anything. It's not worth anything because no one cares.
I mean if let's say albon consistently ends up in p12, he consistently ends up performing "below average"
Albon being always P12 makes him no better than DeVries as far as the competition is concerned.
Or Yuki who is addicted to finishing P11 this year
Again, if you want drivers to be more competitive, you should reward them for performing better than average
The reward is more points
Literally I'm saying
Hey do better you get more points
And again
That removes the competitive aspect tho
This "issue" "exists" in the midfield
I want podium battles
So I'll just take away points from anything outside of P3
The drivers will now be competitive
I am awarding them for performing at a podium level
Like really why do we bother with points? I want to get at the heart as to why we use them to determine the Championships and not GP wins or podiums. Why is the actual determinant for winning points
Yeah but that would be unbalanced, wouldnt it? If you gave everyone a point, the standing remains the same but it only removes the competitive aspect
The only difference would be at the back of the grid
Like the very back
that's....literally what I've been saying
P17-20
If they suck, they suck
But at least we didn't ignore the ones that just stay outside of the arbitrary cutoff
Yeah but why change the system for the ones that suck? Why do we reward them?
It's not a rewardm
It's an acknowledgement
Points are not rewards
They are trackers
They are there to signify "You did better"
It is though, the team with the most points wins the championship
And the driver with the most points gets a trophy too
They are trackers
It would only make sense to reward these points instead of giving them away
No
Literally
It's the same shit
I literally don't understand this participation trophy logic
Its there to determine who is better than who
But it's not, we're literally going in circles about how it makes the races less exciting and less competitive 😭😭😭
Bro, I think having 9 cars get nothing for gaining a track position is not competitive
Why should the cars at the back of the grid be competitive
They're doing badly at the race anyways
Bro then why keep them on the fucking track
Just retire them after Lap 35
That's what I'm saying
If this is your mindset for the backmarkers
Because they might have a chance to end up in the top half????
The backmarkers shouldn't exist
If we removed haas and williams, there will be new backmarkers
There gotta be a team or two that always suck
!time
turtlebyte's location is Makati, Metro Manila, Philippines. 🌍
It is currently 7:13 AM there (Philippine Standard Time). 🕰️
Fuck me how long have we been arguing over this
No idea
Look
What is so wrong
Like
The midfield is literally this
Why are we giving participation points to P4-10
Why
It's not participation points, they performed better than average
How do we know your perception of bad is not warped by the fact the cutoff is at P10
I literally just want the rankings to make sense
Because they did better than half the grid?
I mean even if you think the current point system is harsh, that's what makes a lot of people watch it. It would be boring if we started to watch the cars at the back to battle it out even though they suck
If you beat 19 cars: 25 points
If you beat 18 cars: 17 points
...
If you beat 10 cars: 1 point
If you beat 9 cars, you get the same as beating no one. get fucked.
Youve beaten 9 cars, 10 cars have beaten you
Why get a point?
Arbitrary cutoff
A point isn't real
I don't think
P11
And P20
Should be the same
That's literally my whole thing here
Well it's not treated the same, drivers who are at p11-13 tried to fight for points
Damn
But guess what
Tough luck
Nothing
Who cares
0 points
Effort? Admirable. You get nothing.
Well, that's the competitive part. You want the points? Better luck next time
Having the backmarkers fight for P10 is like determining WDC by number of podium finishes
I'm not saying it's wrong. I'm saying it's a different ballgame at the back
Well, at least they started to improve and it's shown by the current system. Obviously every driver wants to win the championship
They can go one step further
And just have rankings be determined by placements
Like they currently do for P1-10
They have a system. It's good. A sliding scale. The gaps get bigger so that you're incentivized to place higher while still recognizing your current place.
Literally just
Extend that logic
To the whole thing
Have P1 be 100 points for all I care
Cause the points, the actual numbers themselves, don't matter
What matters is everyone is going for it because there's points on the line at every place. There's ways to move up and down the constructors and drivers at every place.
I mean you've said it yourself not too long ago, it would be less exciting to watch the race if everyone got a point. I have no idea who would want to watch the backmarkers fight it out. It's supposed to be harsh and competitive. Changing the system just to accurately show who was the better driver at the back makes no sense.
The backmarkers don't matter because the system doesn't care about them.
You said it yourself also. The changes I propose have little change on the rest of the field. Why deny the fans of the backmarkers, the teams, and the drivers added things to consider like real position, points, battling, strategy because their placement actually matters?
Because it becomes less competitive and exciting to watch? I can use that same argument against you
How is it less competitive and exciting?
Because the points are devalued
There's more competition now because the back has something to play for that doesn't interfere with the middle and fromt
The points don't matter. It's their value in determining the relative placement of the teams
No one bats an eye that Championship Tier and Midfield gets points but when I say backmarkers also should get points all of a sudden there's this talk of devaluing and settling and competitive integrity
Every sport has a point system though. It's the reason why teams try to get as many points as they can. Saying that points don't matter and that it should only serve as a tool for a more accurate ranking is extremely false and wrong
Yeah and sports don't delete data for half the field
If you scored a goal, you earn a point. You don't earn a point for participating.
In soccer, you lose 3-4, at least you get 3 in your GF column
Same with f1? You don't have to be 1st place to earn points
You get -1 in GD because at least they recognize that -1 GD is way better than -19
Beating 9 cars is nothing. It's the same as not even showing up
Yeah but 10 cars have beaten you
Lance Stroll gets as many points as Alex Albon
I scored as many points as Alex Albon
I have an equal contribution to Williams as Alex Albon did in that Williams despite the latter beating Zhou, Hulkenberg, Sargeant, Alonso, Russell, Bottas, Ocon, Tsunoda, Stroll, and Russell
Idk if you've played racing games but even if it's not f1, no one cares if you ended up in p12 or p19. You usually try to end up in the podium or at least the top 10. And aston martin did help lance get points.
It's not that lance is better than albon, he has the better car and it shows in the standings
I meant today
Today
Lance Stroll got as many points as Alex Albon
I, today, got as many points as Alex Albon
Lance Stroll who did not even start is equal to Alex Albon, a man who raced 62 full laps and finished 11th.
I, a person who cannot even drive a car, got as many points as Alex Albon
Just because albon consistently finished 11th doesnt mean he's performed better than lance
I'm literally talking about today
Today
Right now
Tell me
Is it fair
That Alex Albon who finished 11th
Deserves as much as Lance Stroll
Who did not start
Okay so suppose that you were driving in f1 and you think it's not fair because albon is better than you and finished higher than you but got treated equally
Well i do want to ask you this, can you finish in the top 10 like albon?
No
But here's the thing
I think it shouldn't fucking matter that you have to finish above a certain arbitrary threshold
Well, he may not earn the points on this race. He'll def earn it the next race
The fact it's next race this and next race that is asinine to me. It's repugnant.
That's why it's competitive
I could finish dead last. I could DNF. Hell, I could DNS or DNQ.
As harsh as it is, it's still better giving him points for participating
I could DNQ my entire fucking career
And it's equal to a man who finishes 11th every time.
A man who consistently beats 9 other drivers.
Is equal to someone who DNQs.
Why would you want to decrease the competition? It wouldnt be fun to give him the points
It's not points for participating holy shit
It doesn't decrease competition
Its not giving
Oh my god
But it does 💀
Literally
We give points to P4-10
We give points in general
Again
Why do we not complain that the midfield just doesn't go for podium
Theyre getting points
If we take away the pointsz they'd fight for podium
Or all of that
I mean if you always end up in p11, why not try to earn the points
If bro can't end up in p10, as harsh as it sounds, he doesnt deserve the points
That's the whole fucking point of f1 😭😭
Literally teams care about the points because points give them placement which gives them prize money
That's why they fucking want the points
It's cause of the Constructors Rank
It's cause of the prize pot
So it's not about the points
It's about the rank
If they want the points, why would the fia devalue it 💀
It's not 1 Point = $5,000
It's 10th = $3M
So the points themselves
Don't have a value
It's the relative distribution
Literally
OKAY SO WE'RE GOING SOMEWHERE
IF I RAN F1
AND TEAMS WANT TO RANK HIGHER
TO EARN MORE MONEY
WHY WOULD I DEVALUE IT???
Why give every team a point for participation
ITS NOT PARTICIPATION
When i could simply tell them to fuck off and do better next time
That's literally the idea you're proposing 💀💀💀
NO MONEY IS MOVING AROUND
Who gives a shit about how accurate the ranking is for the backmarkers
They suck anyways
Why change the whole fucking system for teams that end up in the back
It is
It makes it less competitive and less exciting to watch
No
Why
This is literally the middle
I'm going to be real with you
I think you're lying when you say it's not boring because they're in the top half of the grid
Its not boring because they're getting more points is the real reason
Why wouldn't you be excited? They're getting more points.
The logic tracks all the way to P1.
It's a battle though? And they're fighting for points? Why would i give a shit about a battle between p18 and p19?
They both suck
I'll be real
Relatively speaking obviously, whether it's the car or the driver among other drivers
I think the problem is that
The system has neglected backmarkers so much
That it's impossible to have this discussion
Nascar had that system
Idk how long you've been watching this sport
And even nascar changed it
Like, if the mentality is that backmarkers by default are uninteresting
Then any justification I bring that makes them interesting will be retorted with the rebuttal that they are uninteresting
Even if the changes are minimal and barely affect the rest of the grid
Like, battles are interesting to me. People fighting for position is interesting to me. But to you if you see a number higher than 11 on the leftmost side of the timing table, then I suppose the interesting factor of it goes away.
I don't think anyone is actually content being a backmarker. But you make do with what you have and push forward.
Sometimes that's not enough to make it to the top half
But for the last time
If a team took the effort and made it all the way from being garbage to just outside the points. I would at least like to see their performance be reflected on the leaderboard as opposed to a team thats just not competive at all. Because as it stands right now they'd both end up at 0
That is all.
It's not that the backmarkers aren't interesting, they simply can't produce exciting racing because of the cars they're working with. And it's not that I or anyone exclusively watch the top 10 and dont care about the other half of the grid, the midfield creates a lot of exciting races even at p15, but they're exciting because the drivers will eventually fight for points or at least try to. If charles leclerc went from p5 and had the worst pitstop and ended up in p20 after getting out of the pit, it would create more excitement to watch charles try to end up in the points zone than if he'd get rewarded regardless of where ends up.
im basiclly the same timezone as japan 😎
Format is 100-75-60-48-40-32-26-22-18-15-12-9-7-5-4-3-2-1-0-0. Sprint is untouched (only P8 and up get points) but all points are quadrupled. Fastest lap grants 4 points (1/25th the value of a GP win, enough points to bridge the gap from P10-P9) and is only given to P10 and up.
All changes are for P9 and below. Left is adjusted, right is real-life.
crazy
The more interesting part is how close alpine and williams are in the new hypothetical format compared to irl
oh for fucks sake
finally a good time
Didn’t you hear what Max said when someone asked him the plans for next race?
no?
Target for Suzuka is to win at least by 20 seconds
did he actually say that 😂
Yep
yeah well
🎥| Max siendo entrevistado después de la carrera en Singapur 🇸🇬:
"El objetivo es ganar al menos por 20 segundos. Después de estar 20 segundos por detrás, trataremos de recuperarnos y ganar por 20 segundos."
#SingaporeGP | © ESPN
111
we'll be back in sao paulo anyway so
High
Near certain
back to our regularly schedueled programming
In case anyone was wondering, the Adjusted™️ Constructors Standings is
Adj. IRL Team Name
2415 597 Red Bull
1139 289 Mercedes
1019 265 Ferrari
925 217 Aston Martin
646 139 McLaren
439 81 Alpine
227 21 Williams
217 10 Alfa Romeo
191 5 AlphaTauri
161 12 Haas
Williams is now half of Alpine instead of a quarter. Haas drops to last instead of being 8th. The bottom 4 teams are very close to one another instead of being multiple P8-P10 finishes away
honestly a bit delulu but hoping she'd show up at the las vegas gp
well she could if one of the teams took her into their garage
but she couldn’t do the grid walk
Maybe AM will take her :D
Maybe but maybe HAAS you know American team ✨
HAAS don’t even have the money for a proper screens down at the pit
they wouldn’t have the money to keep Taylor secure in their garage 😂
I need Alonso and Tay to have at least just one selfie together. The memes would be goated.
yeah it would be very funny
Oh and DannyRic. I'm sure he'd love it.
Lewis and Taylor have met before though, right?
Like way way back, forgot for what
Oh wow, only 8 drivers this year are 180cm and up. Charles, Logan, Max, Lance, Nico, George, Alex, Esteban
Charles is listed as 180
Charles lying about his height is a hilarious prospect
But yeah, Tay is 180. If she wears like 3 inch heels, it's over for the entire grid
danny ric gives tall energy
I can't believe Alex is the tallest
Oh, Hulkenberg
We need them all in a police lineup
Ocon is the tallest
Grill The Grid is BACK! Our first episode of 2022 asks a very important question... rank the grid in height order. Get ready for lots of laughs, and surprises!
For more F1® videos, visit http://www.Formula1.com
Follow F1®:
http://www.instagram.com/F1
https://www.facebook.com/Formula1/
http://www.twitter.com/F1
https://www.twitch.tv/formula1
h...
“Charles is 180”
Seb “Pfft no he’s not…ask the engineers, he’s the same”
Seb is savage
But yeah, Alex being up there, just like 1cm shy of Esteban
I would never have guessed
And when Seb is told Lando is apparently the same height as him “is he??” with a very high tone
some of them were definitely very generous with their height measurements
Charles "180cm" Leclerc
I wonder who'll be the random celebrity to wave the checkered flag at Vegas
Daniel looks like he should be 6 foot
wonder what super cringy thing they’ll do in Las Vegas like in Miami
Penn or Teller
Teller doing an entire physical comedy set before waving the flag would be great ngl
actually planning on waking up at 6am to watch the las vegas race
Is it not a night race?
im forced to have a normal sleep schedule this weekend...
the japanese race is at 6am for me as well
oh at least cota is at a normal time
late message bc im stupid CARLOS SAINZZZ LETS GOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO 💯
actually not too many races left this year
pls pray that next year we have a more competitive championship fight
if we didn't hear the dutch anthem in singapore something will go down
ITS A SIGN
debating on whether or not i should get up at 8:30 am for practice or just quali and the race
aww me to (i dont even have f1 im too broke)
the radio message 😔
my heart was racing
as soon as george crashed i fucking threw the remote and turned the tv off 😆
i screamed like i accidentally stepped on my pet ant
i was like
NOOOO GEOORGEE
i think i concerned the neighbors
I know :D
George held Lewis up though so 🌝
Lewis probably would’ve gotten past Lando if George wasn’t there
even if, singapore gp was intense
Ocon probably
Isn't albon close to 2 meters or something
Smooth Operator was really at like 400IQ though for using Lando to hold up the Mercs
God tier strategy
The galaxy brain on this man
McLaren have agreed a fresh multi-year contract extension with Oscar Piastri ✍️
#F1 @McLarenF1
1972
150
2026
I hope he did not make a mistake..
Stress-free contract announcement like always 😉
12109
987
He is 22 years old. He did not make a mistake
who needed that when you had George holding up Lewis anyway
nobody is gonna turn down a seat
plus McClaren have really improved
they are a solid 3rd-4th constructor
aston martin have dropped off from where they were
as a constructor yes. as an individual performance they have never been better
not lance
he is doing wonders with a POS aston
Stroll is lucky his daddy owns that team
at some point even i would be embarrassed by that
yeahhhhh...
he's just not performing well enough
for Alonso to have 170 points and Stroll to have 47 points
thats a motivation crusher
i'm sure he's thinking about it
he was really pushing when he put himself in the wall
proves he isnt in control of the car and needs all the input from the principles
Sargeant is probably on thin ice too
williams itself is on thin ice
they need tons of money for r&d to keep up
and i dont see alot of sponsors on the car
doesn’t help when their driver is costing them a lot
and isn’t scoring points
Albon carrying
Sargeant will just deck it into a wall in Vegas
the trick is they need to turn sometimes
There are rumours of Drugovich trying very hard for Logan's seat. He's been in contact with Williams apparently
anything is better than logan at the moment


