#Zig Zag infill behind inner perimeters
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
The project 3MF would be better so we can see all the settings you are currently using.
post the 3mf file
It is a lot of plates but it is doing it universally Let me save it and attach
I've seen this issue before and figured out how to fix it, but can't remember off the top of my head. It's a simple settings change though.
is it plate 1? which layer number?
And which Orca version exactly?
It shows as Internal solid infill and is meant to act as an anchor point for Internal bridging. As I recall this was a new feature in v2.3.1. Some setting will change it to be a straight line instead of this zig-zag.
But as I remember it was not very intuitive.
it's the zig zag backing up the walls, right?
Yeah
it's due to ensure vertical shell thickness, and happens in sloped regions
if you set it to none, for example, it goes away
Interesting. I could have sworn I had seen it in models with straight sides that still had it even with that feature off. Guess I will have to go back and double check some things.
Makes sense... I will have to try it both on and off and see how it effects prints. If I dont need it I could save some time on large plates
Thank You for the assist...greatly appreciated, new slicers are definely a learning curve
if you set 'detect narrow internal infill' it will change it to simply be an extra perimeter or two printed at infill speeds
I have had cases where 'ensure vertical shell thickness' needed to be set to 'all' for prints to come out nicely
(this is what I recommend, btw)
Ah! That's probably what I was thinking of. Nice job!
thank you
Doesnt that infil small triangles in corners instead of using monotonic lines everywhere?
I had that on and it seemed sloppy to me....guess its my linear brain, lol
I want to revisit that one for sure.... Many thanks for the clarity.
slicers have a steep learning curve when you start to get into all the settings
it is a little weird and I remember thinking the same thing when it was first added. But it makes the prints faster and doesn't affect the external quality.
It's supposed to help speed up printing, but the results seem insignificant...unless maybe on very intricate models where a lot of solid infill travel moves could be an issue.
Fixing this line issue is a bonus though, so that's something.
replacing the zig-zig with a straight line reduces print time fairly significantly, especially on older printers with lower acceleration
I can't complain.... I am getting some nice results so far
if you want the curves to be nice try variable layer height
Still have a lot of inefficiencies in my settings I am sure.
Never played with that before
as both the curved surfaces are bout the same height as each other it would be perfect
If you see any other "mis-settings" in my profile feel free to make me aware. I definitely got a bit more to learn with Orca.
there are about 750 settings not sure many know what they all do😆
Definitely not, haha. Still learning new things about it almost every day.
True
I have been able to get pretty decent prints from it so far for the short time I have been using it