#Globe
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
It doesn't need the added complexity or nerf of not working when you only have one hand left.
Ok
why do you have to lose 2 hands
Because it would unbalanced if it just retriggers all cards 
? the drawback is you have to play a full house
horrible hand
it seems maybe as good as sock
full house haters when they learn about spare trousers, jolly joker, zany joker, mad joker, sly joker, wily joker, clever joker, card sharp, or supernova
card sharp and supernova work with any hand type but
full house has the most amount of jokers that target it i think
most of those synergize with 3oak way better
and with trousers you would very rarely play fh over 2pair
if I have the option between full house or two pair why would I pick two pair
but I'll let your bad opinions slide because you have the greatest username ever
Because you've gotten 6 Uranuses and 1 Earth
oh true
and because fh is way harder to draw
I think it's like my most played hand
and 4 cards > 5 cards
ok thats actually fair
whats ur gold stake winrate doin that lol
jokes on you I haven't even beaten blue stake on anything
bet you feel real dumb now
idiot
Full House might be why lol
I mostly just play blue deck white stake
because it's the easiest
I play to have fun
:3
anyways the joker seems fine if the -1 hand is removed
I don't like direction it's going
I'm like 99.5% sure that's a joke at Jebil's own expense.
yeah
They assumed I'm good at the game and I was calling them an idiot because they're wrong and actually I'm really bad
You already pretty much have to deck fix to make Full House viable, and if you're doing that anyway, why not deck fix to something that gets unconditional retriggers?
It's pretty difficult to get Full Houses when you only have 2 discards.
especially if you're using one of them for some sort of value, like Trading card.
fair
but idk usually I beat small blind ante 1 by doing a full house
I usually just spam full houses
I don't find them too hard to get
again I think I'm just lucky when it comes to them
You can't count on full houses, you get way better odds going for flushes
lets ignore the fact that some of my best runs have been ruined because I didn't get a full house when I needed one
on ante 1.
nuh uh
sure but past that its a bad option
compare earth to venus
So should it be changed to have no penalty?...
I think so
Definitely
You're going to probably need to use hands as discards to get your full house anyway, so penalizing additional hands is painful.
the fact that all of these jokers either work better with other hands or are irrelevant after earlygame is insane
Full house doesn’t have good synergy and it’s hard to fix for
Tho it scales well
eh
full house fans when flush house enjoyers walk in