#Globe

1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)

obsidian urchin
#

If played hand contains full house retrigger all cards

rapid stone
#

as a full house enjoyer, this is evil

#

I love it

wooden ibex
#

It doesn't need the added complexity or nerf of not working when you only have one hand left.

royal cipher
#

why do you have to lose 2 hands

obsidian urchin
royal cipher
#

? the drawback is you have to play a full house

#

horrible hand

#

it seems maybe as good as sock

rapid stone
#

full house haters when they learn about spare trousers, jolly joker, zany joker, mad joker, sly joker, wily joker, clever joker, card sharp, or supernova

#

card sharp and supernova work with any hand type but

#

full house has the most amount of jokers that target it i think

royal cipher
#

most of those synergize with 3oak way better

#

and with trousers you would very rarely play fh over 2pair

rapid stone
#

if I have the option between full house or two pair why would I pick two pair

#

but I'll let your bad opinions slide because you have the greatest username ever

tiny mortar
#

Because you've gotten 6 Uranuses and 1 Earth

rapid stone
#

oh true

royal cipher
#

and because fh is way harder to draw

rapid stone
#

I think it's like my most played hand

royal cipher
#

and 4 cards > 5 cards

rapid stone
#

ok thats actually fair

royal cipher
rapid stone
#

jokes on you I haven't even beaten blue stake on anything

#

bet you feel real dumb now

#

idiot

tiny mortar
#

Full House might be why lol

rapid stone
#

I mostly just play blue deck white stake

#

because it's the easiest

#

I play to have fun

#

:3

royal cipher
#

anyways the joker seems fine if the -1 hand is removed

obsidian urchin
tiny mortar
#

I'm like 99.5% sure that's a joke at Jebil's own expense.

rapid stone
#

yeah

#

They assumed I'm good at the game and I was calling them an idiot because they're wrong and actually I'm really bad

tiny mortar
#

So anyway, about this joker.

#

I think it's pretty limited, tbh.

rapid stone
#

I like it

#

but then again

#

I am the only fan of full house

tiny mortar
#

You already pretty much have to deck fix to make Full House viable, and if you're doing that anyway, why not deck fix to something that gets unconditional retriggers?

rapid stone
#

idk why you guys are saying that

#

like

#

maybe I'm just super lucky

tiny mortar
#

It's pretty difficult to get Full Houses when you only have 2 discards.

#

especially if you're using one of them for some sort of value, like Trading card.

rapid stone
#

fair

#

but idk usually I beat small blind ante 1 by doing a full house

#

I usually just spam full houses

#

I don't find them too hard to get

#

again I think I'm just lucky when it comes to them

tiny mortar
#

You can't count on full houses, you get way better odds going for flushes

rapid stone
#

lets ignore the fact that some of my best runs have been ruined because I didn't get a full house when I needed one

tiny mortar
#

on ante 1.

rapid stone
#

nuh uh

royal cipher
#

compare earth to venus

obsidian urchin
#

So should it be changed to have no penalty?...

rapid stone
#

I think so

tiny mortar
#

Definitely

#

You're going to probably need to use hands as discards to get your full house anyway, so penalizing additional hands is painful.

languid solar
#

As someone who plays full house for the meme of it

#

Count me in

glad forum
dreamy willow
#

Tho it scales well

glad forum
#

eh

lost cipher
#

full house fans when flush house enjoyers walk in