#Blood Moon
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Depends on the reference you're thinking of
i would get smited by moderators if i mentioned what im thinking
I think it's a vampire reference, not a gynecological reference...
Blood Moons were thought to be caused by vampires or somehow related to vampires.
And the effect seems to imply that it turns the queens vampiric.
phew
Oh, God no
lol
Nailed it! That's the exact theming I had in mind!
Queens were chosen over Jacks due to shoot the moon
So question, if the card is unable to destroy a card in hand, does it still give the bonus?
Yes
I dont want it to give too much mult tho, as it's very heavy deckfixing
1.5 Fits other jokers
I'd recommend either buffing it to x2 or x2.5 even and requiring that a card is actually destroyed in order to trigger, or nerfing to x1.5 and keeping the behavior where you just get the bonus from playing it.
You can make it less deck fixing by having the joker destroy the card instead of each queen.
counting on baron being 1.5x and this giving deckfixing on top of its effect 1.5x instead of 1.75x is fair imo