#Why doesn't Black Hole buff Constellation?
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
It's a soul card
Honestly black hole not upgrading constellation was really dumb but it makes sense since it's technically not a planet card
This just in, a black hole is a planet
(No, don't say pluto, eries or ceres, theyre all dwarf planets)
Isn't it a collapsed star?
Yes
Really big card
not an actual planet
It shows up in the Celestial packs, not the Spectral packs, so I think it should count as a planet.
It shows up in both
would be funny if Blackhole makes Constellation lose x0.1 mult since its technically as 1 planet gone
Blackhole is a spectral card, but a special one with the layout of a planet card. Soul is similar, it is a spectral with the design of a tarot. But it does feel weird that it doesnât do that. IMO, having QOL is more important than respecting vague rules.
does it trigger satellite
No
it should, its a totally different planet card
Itâs not a planet
it doesnt
cause both Soul and Blackhole,despite each representing in individual pack,still count as Spectral
if constellation gained mult every time hands leveled up this change would make sense, but it explicitly only says planet cards
its like saying soul should count as a tarot card to fortune teller because it can only be found in tarot packs
loses x0.5 because of the death of a solar system
Should black hole work with The Fool? It states that it creates the last planet used, just like how Constellation states it needs planets
Black hole doesn't work with fool because it's a spectral
It also shows up in the spectral menu and not the planets
So soul is a tarot and not a spectral?
You said really big planet card: which was tong
Wrong*
no soul is spectral
It was to them saying that blackhole should be a planet
I was pointing out how it doesn't really make sense unless you look at it in a vacuum
It can infact be something you painfully must do sometime. You're scaling up Constellation, and you might not take Black Hole and instead take a planet card.
I like that it adds some nuance into your gameplay instead of being a must-take every time
sometimes Iâm explicitly avoiding scaling a hand type, so I can play it more times before the round ends (get through more of the deck, charge up scaling jokers more times)
so it might be correct for me to pick Pluto over Black Hole even without the Constellation interaction. but havenât passed up Black Hole in a real game yet
Something else you can do is Black Hole doesn't overwrite your Fool, so if you want to have Fool duplicate a specific planet then you could skip BH
Constellation specifically states âPlanet cardâ, black holes arenât a planet card or even a planet in general. They buff the level of hands, but thereâs also other aspects of the game that do that which arenât planet cards. Doesnât make sense flavor wise or mechanic wise for black hole to trigger constellation
Counterpoint. It's decorated as a planet card and it functions as planet card. The only reason it isn't one is to avoid Fool (and thus perkeo & observatory) abuse.
Yes, because just like soul they're spectral representations of the other packs..
Should soul count as a tarot for fool?
Because constellation mentions planet cards; so if blackhole counts it should also counts for fool
If you want to go the in-game definitions route that is
I'm going common sense route
Common sense says black holes arenât planets
astral cards have a different frame to planets, how is this even a discussion?
It isnt a planet, isnt classified as a planet card by fool, vouchers, or Jokers, has a different frame.
You are ignoring common sense to make it work
*the different frame is based off of planets admittedly, but so is soul, and soul isn't a tarot so.. :/
Ok but if it doesn't work with fool why should it work with constellation
They both specify planet cards in their description
If black hole functions as a planet card, then space joker does too
balatro is a complex game that needs to stay consistent to stay understandable. Adding random edge cases can rapidly turn the game into gibberish.