#This post sucks pls kill it
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
Yeah but I actually want it gone
Ah, a classic case of âgit gud scrubâ
I knew that was coming
You should simply just have better luck 
Alright thanks I'll contact Satan to increase my luck
tbf, my luck isnât any better, I only have 1 or 2 decks at gold stake
:O
jst dont use it
make erratic deck randomize enhancements, suits and ranks at end of every round
thats way too random
fine, also let it add or remove up to 15 cards
But I wanna 100% balatro đ„ș
jst keep restarting
I've done that a lot lol
like get like 10+ of one rank or like 20+ one suit and u have a simple win
Oki :3
try it
Oki
erratics actually so easy
Not if I'm on purple stake đ
purple is generically hard
Erratic wasn't that hard imo. I usually just waited til I had 8+ of a rank and just went all in on it
R holder L
Sorry
+4 mult
Is this like holy water but instead of demons it repels skinky
Agh
You still put your fingers in a cross, but it's actually a Plus sign
Lol
ngl i agree
erratic deck is REALLY badly designed
even more so than black deck
its just that if you want any chance to utilize the deck, you're basically forced to spend a ton of time just holding r until you get 10 of something
it was pain to gold stake, not because of the difficulty mostly, but because it just goes against what a deck should be
yeah thats like an argument for why it should be reworked lmao
if this is the standard gameplay loop thats just anti-fun
I think its funny rho
alright but this is a game with c+ in it
Sorry theyâre
idk what eden is but is the only reasonable thing to do when playing as them or whatever it is restarting for a few minutes until you highroll with the randomness
If thatâs reasonable in your eyes then thatâs a you issue tbh
Nothing says oh you MUST hold r !!
except then you gain no benefit from the deck
literally in this thread people are dismissing this by saying "its easy just hold r lol"
Also eden is an isaac character with randomized stats and a starting item and active item
Well thatâs a bad argument imo
âJust hold râ is not at all related to the game design of the deck
but if you aren't doing it you're just making it worse
Its just how you choose tonplay
Iâd rather that than just hold r and wait for something op. That sounds so awfully boring
Get what you get, try to make it work, and if you fail, try again
but its how it plays out 90% of the time on high stakes when you really need a deck benefit
No it isnt
Youâre actively choosing to hold r
The deck isnt supposed to be the hold r deck
and by actively choosing not to hold r you're kinda just shooting yourself in the foot
It just happens that some people are impatient and want their build to be handed to them on a silver platter
Okay I'm gonna just put this here rq
No you arenât, youâre playing the game normally
This is like saying choosing not to savescum is actively shooting yourself in the foot
"erm just cope"
Id think a rework would be cool
Isnt the whole point of suggestions to change things in the game
But it's an interesting concept, still not impossible to win with in 99.9% of scenarios, and gives you early deck shaping
This is a removal, not rework or change
Like iâm all for keeping erratic but thatâs a pointless srgument
How would you even change it
Removal changes the game
If they were suggesting changes to it, I'd be more sympathetic IMO
I don't know, but they mentioned reworks above
Now it always gives at least 10 of one rank so you dont hold r 
Lowkey? Make it start with 40 cards instead of 52
Arguing for removal of something that is unique content makes 0 sense if the argument is not liking it
i would prefer a rework but idk how you would go about that while keeping it as erratic
Abandoned but better?
The content sucks
I had fun w it
You literally just said you dislike it
And can be fun if you dont just do the same boring process of holding r until you get an op start
Yes, because it's inconsistent and that can be unfun alot
People will say this and then use bloodstone smh
Joke
But I've also had alot of "8 kings" starts, which are fun. Removing it would remove the high and low, and i value the high over it
Bloodstone is a really fun Joker, until it fails me then I cuss out my screen for an hour
i mean its still not good design to have a deck where it is strictly optimal to just hold r whether or not your playstyle does it or not
Yeah its bad because its inconsistent
I dont care if its strictly optimal because thats not even technically gameplay
i also think bloodstone is in the top 10 or so worst jokers but thats besides the point
I was jokning
yeah ik
ive said what i can say for the most part
In isaac, its technically optimal to hold r until you get a good item at the start, but people often dont do that because its boring as shit and resets the win streak
Hell you could argue that holding r applies to any deck
i.e investment tag/holo tag
Pretty much
I have heard people argue thatâs the optimal way to play
About literal gambling..
It is not literally gambling
about
Its not about gambling
Even ignoring hold-r, erratic is just boring also
Unless you're searching the seeds, it's by definition gambling dude
I remember a suggestion about being able to choose the first skip tag because of r holding being âmetaâ
Maybe but is it a crime for decks to be boring
Wait acc
I also hate anaglyph
But last time I said analglyph was the most boring deck people got mad at me
Why not delete red too cuz thatâs boring
You right tho
Its just normal defk
Deck
And maybe a good skip from time to time
Its a "stockpile double tags until you win, then negative tag for funny" deck half my runs
It's the 'get $100 ante 6 from a skip' deck
Pretty much
I never played it much due to it being so lame
Still though, it shouldnt be deleted
It shouldn't get deleted for being boring and nobody's arguing that, but erratic is both too much of a hold-r deck and it's boring
Its not a hold r deck
Like what does erratic deck add to the game? It could just be a challenge
That is a choice made by the player
Interesting point
Not sure how to argue it⊠but atp it would be kinda hard to transition erratic into a challenge
My issue is that, as the game is, it removes the biggest "upside" of erratic
Being cool seeded runs
Otherwise it's just meh, and that's still a hold R challenge
Do y'all still want erratic deck in the game because you like it, or just because you don't want content being removed?
I dont actually know if i like it but i do know there havent really been good arguments for itâs removal
I just don't see there being a satisfying thing to do here
âIts just a hold r deckâ is only true if you let it be
A rework is hard to think of and balance, removing it removes some cool seeds, keeping it irritates some people, and making it a challenge keeps it "hold R" without the seeded/best aspect of it
No matter what, some niche of peoplr are unhappy
Removing it would also take away from the people who already put in the effort to gold stake it
I know I would personally be peeved if you made it a challenge
Moreso than removal or keeping it
I think a rework for Erratic would be making it less Erratic technically. Some guaranteed bounds for some ranks and suits so you always have some interesting options at the very least each deck
Here: Erratic is a basic deck that has minimal strengths to it. It's a deck where you hope to high roll and get an interesting start with 8+ of the same card in order to actually get the upsides of the deck. Outside of those scenarios, Erratic is a deck with no upside and plays like a vanilla deck. In order to actually have fun with the deck, you need to get a good start.
To get a good start like that you need to reset the deck a ton before even playing a single round. This is different from resetting to get a good starting Joker since that at least requires interacting with the first couple shops rather than a run being dead from the start. Getting a bad start with weak Jokers and overall shops can still be fun to turn around in the end with good resource management and adapting to what you're giving, leading to fun streaking and gold staking experiences. However, getting a bad erratic deck just leaves you with a basic deck with no upsides, and potentially just downsides from some Jokers being harder to activate (like rank-specific ones)
I feel like the deck adds nothing to the game since outside of the top 5% or so of starts, it's a bland and boring deck, but to actually have an interesting start, you need to hold-r which is lame af
So basically, the deck is boring?
Yes i did read the whole thing :3
Yeah, it's boring and the excessive rng doesn't add anything
I think i get your point⊠the deck is very clearly flawed but i dont think removal would be the right way to go
Because there are other boring decks
While they dont have the same rng factor
Silver deck was removed for being super hold-r, it's not as extreme as silver deck is but I think it's similar
Yea i get that
I didnt play the demo but i can only assume how boring silver deck was
Same here
idk about fully deleting erratic deck, but I can't think of any interesting rework for it and I'd rather it be deleted than kept as is
i dont think a deck being kinda boring is good enough reason to have it removed
Yea
at worst its a slightly worse base deck
If there was a way to incentivize not holding r would erratic be more interesting
i really dont think it matters
but erratic is nice đ„ș
i like my 2s and excessive clubs
maybe erratic should only give decks that have a large deviation with the model deck of cards
Noo, erratic is my favorite deck
It is so much fun to play with the randomness, alternatively you can reset over and over til you get a deck you like if you want to try a build out which is nice as it is like a soft deck fixing for you
To be honest I just made this post to vent my frustrations
I actually like erratic deck, I was just extremely angy that I can't beat purple stake
:3
I do think the post brought up a decent discussion, but I do enjoy Erratic (though for trying to win or go on a streak it's horrid lol)
Yeah, that's what I was suggesting. Removing some of the randomness to make it seem more random/erratic.
Like guarantees there will be at least three ranks that are 7+ cards and at least three ranks with 3-0 cards. Could do something similar with suits too, so guaranteed one suit will either have like +8 cards or -8 cards
Erratic deck should randomize every thing/j
I mean eh, in later stakes it's just press new run button simulator to me and it's really annoying
Are you struggling with a deck with no real downside?
Yeah, it took me a while to beat purple stake
Also erratic deck has a few downsides
It's not that bad of a deck though, I guess purple stake is just really hard for every deck, its just pressing new run a bunch gets very annoying
Most of the tips I've gotten were just "hope for a good deck to use 4oak with"
Also can a mod just delete this post, this post sucks a lot and the only reason why it exists is because I wanted to vent my frustrations out
I dont get this argument when people have been arguing that it isnt
Thats a pretty bad tip tbh, just make do with what you get. Could make for an interesting challenge
Yeah but the first 30 runs I tried doing with what I have
90% of the jokers I saw were page 1 jokers
It wasn't really the decks fault, it was just my absolutely horrendous joker luck
Yeah fair
I'm getting better though ^-^
It's quirky and random
:3
:3
:3
Erratic best deck
perhaps
Plasma best deck
I have no idea what this means but yes I agree
violet vessel needs a score of 1.2 million to beat
Ohh
Tbh, as someone who loves randomizer mods, and all the advantages and setbacks that will always come from a randomized run, I kinda wish erratic went harder, was just completely unhinged, and entirely random. You could get 40 cards that all have editions, seals, etc., or 20 cards that donât really have anything to them. Just completely random, no holds barred. The fun of something being ârandomizedâ comes in the fact that either the run is gonna be free in some areas, or youâre going to be incredibly disadvantaged and have to work with the very few available tools you have to your deck in other areas. Of course, the downside is that if you get a run with like 15 face cards and run into plant, itâs pretty much over unless you pull a fuck ton of strengths and deaths to convert to aces, or you have a bunch of jokers that can pick up the slack for you. And I think thatâs the main crux to letting erratic be more wild and less boring. So many bosses tend to just hard counter certain cards, certain hands, certain playstyles, that you canât really design a deck around being completely random, and truly adapting on the fly. Itâs a bad deck because itâs boring, and itâs boring because thereâs simply too many bosses, and too many situations that could cause problems with a completely randomized deck, so it needs to have bunch of stipulations, failsafes, setbacks, and be tuned down to the point that itâs just so uninteresting to play. But I think the concept is there, and it could genuinely be a really fun deck. I think it just needs to be completely unchained. Let it run wild, let it randomize everything about the deck, because a deck that is completely different every single time in every way will always be far more better than âlook, now you have 5 more jacks than usualâ. Even if not every run is gonna be a winner, itâs much more fun saying âI had a run with nothing more than 10 glass red seal jacksâ then âI had a run with a couple more jacks and numbered cards, but no kings and one less queenâ
TRUEEEE
my best run unseeded was on erratic. got like e16 with shoot the moon, baron, and mime. started with 8-9 kings and queens
This is exactly why I love erratic
I had my best run with erratic a few hours ago, reached 400 billion :3
i ain't reading alla that :( too much text
Read it!!1!!1!1 READ IT!1!1!!1
Hold on let me simplify it for you
Honestly, this whole concept of "randomization" should just go off the deep end. Why stop at card counts, seals, or editions? No, no, noâeverything should be randomized. Imagine each game opening with the possibility that the deck itself is a shifting, unstable temporal anomaly, where cards randomly turn into different languages mid-run, some holographic, some just pure static fuzz, and others that are literally just empty spaces with notes like "Card Not Found" scrawled on them. Whoâs to say your "deck" canât be a strange assortment of snack items, foreign currency, and the occasional jellybean? And forget bosses that counter specific cards. How about bosses that just straight-up glitch in and out of existence? Or better yet, bosses that ask you trivia about obscure 16th-century philosophy mid-battle, and if you fail, your entire deck gets converted into, I don't know, paperclips and dust bunnies?
Totally didn't use chat gpt for this >:3
Lol, did you even read what it gave you before sending it?
Erratic deck weak, make brain hurt. Cards all over place, no planâsometimes strong, other times like soggy rock. Boss smash puny deck easy, erratic no fun, no think! H
H
Black deck stupid as hell! Get one more Joker, but lose handâwhat the fuck?! Need 100 items to unlock? Make caveman cry! Black deck suck big rock! Caveman review :3
TLDR; Erratic is a bad deck because itâs boring, but itâs boring because itâs a heavily nerfed deck compared to what it has the potential to be, because of failsafes, the boss design, and general gameplay reasons. If Thunk actually just let the deck be completely random, with deck size (maybe a deck range of like 15-52), editions, seals, etc., it would already be much more fun than what it is now, even if you donât expect to win with every hand, or even if the game becomes a cakewalk. Itâs much better than just âyou get 5 more jacks than usualâ
(Thatâs the shortest I can possibly go without the argument making less sense, hope thatâs short enough lol)
"Erratic deck bad! Boring and weak! Thunk make deck too safe, ruin fun! If deck randomâsize big, lots of cards, cool stuffâit be better! CAVEMAN WANT CHAOS! More fun than just "five extra jacks!" CAVEMAN WANT EXCITEMENT, NOT DULLNESS!"
I guess that also works, kind of
ERRATIC DECK BAD! SO FUCKING BORING! THUNK MAKE IT WEAK AND SAFE! CAVEMAN WANT CHAOS, NOT DULL CRAP! IF DECK BIG AND RANDOM, IT BE BETTER! AAAAAHHHH! CAVEMAN SCREAM LIKE BLOODLINE GONE! MORE FUN THAN "FIVE EXTRA JACKS!" CAVEMAN WANT EXCITEMENT! CAVEMAN SO FURIOUS!
Here's a better one
erratic deck not erratic enough
I think erratic is good enough to not be broken
Its pretty much starting with deck fixing
Yeah hehe
It's pretty nice :3
How do I delete this post btw
Do I just delete the original message
I think that does it? You could also close it manually in the settings iirc
Lmao you can just let it die
Yeah fair :3
Never shall die
...change the post name??
yeah i figured how to do it