#Backup Plan (Uncommon)
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
wouldn't it be more balanced it if were like x1.5 or x2
Yeah I was wondering about the X
I think X2 is fair, X1.5 makes it on par with poly
x2 is enough ye
ok nice
I assume Blueprint makes it do nothing lmao
"incompattable"
When stuff like cavendish or blackboard exists, x2 feels severely underpowered (especially when you can't have other xMult to multiply with the x2). x3 seems like it could be a viable standalone xMult.
Both of those have conditions to obtain/use, this is basically free
Ramen is also a free 2x too
being unable to use other xMult is not exactly free (like, even with x3 you probably don't pass VV in gold stake)
[also re Ramen, I do believe it shold be buffed to x3 and higher deecoy, x2 seems to weak with the drawback of not using discards if you want to keep it]
what
Ramen is pretty solid, it doesn't need that huge of a buff. And just because a single Joker doesn't oneshot VV on gold stake doesn't make it weak?
Like a free 2x from this is pretty fair, a free 3x is too much. Look at stuff like Seeing Double or The Duo, those are basically free 2x and are pretty good
A Joker like this would be a super strong early game carry, and 3x would be too much and would be a build-around
yeah, not passing VV on gold stake indeed doesn't make it weak (which is why with x3 I believe it'd be a strong joker countered by wall/VV, just like card sharp is a strong joker countered by the eye). But with x2 it just feels very weak for a long-term joker (and if we want to make it an early-game carry that's meant to be sold later make it common).
Commons tend to not give x mult, it's a perfectly fine uncommon
That's a fair point, and why I have a preference for make it x3 (which yes, means it would be a build-around, but isn't it supposed to be one as a joker that literally forbids you to use a category of jokers ?) My experinence with x2 like seeing double/duo/ramen is they often feel weak because you already have a x3 when they show up and jokers that contribute actively to your build (definitely not F-tier, but still mid at best).
Maybe it's the x3s that need a nerf though.
Its fine to have jokers in the game that you keep around for a little while and then sell when you get better ones. Not every joker needs to be lategame viable.
wouldn't backup plan be nicer as a common
because as soon as you get an ×mult its effect invalidates
Goofy thought: x1.5 mult, retriggers once if you don’t have other times-mult jokers
- Not a total dud if you pick up something better
- 2.25x total mult in best case scenario (a little better than 2x but not so much that it should be busted)
- Interacts in a fun way with editions like foil
It doesnt interact with editions any differently
1.5x isnt usually worth keeping but it is nice for when you have nothing better
huh, I guess you’re right
it depends on whether it’s worded the same as blueprint/brainstorm
those specifically copy the effect of jokers
A polychrome version of your idea could be quite powerful
The thing is that no joker is able to retrigger yet
Not itself or other jokers
whether it’s possible for technical reasons is another conundrum
but if it is, Could Be Neat
Its most likely possible
A polychrome would be 5.0625x mult which is quite a lot
Enough to serve as your only source of xmult
Still gets beaten by any x3 and x2 ofc
But would be a delight on painted deck
Where your slots are at a premium
Would also be nice for stickering because then you’d have really strong xmult for only 1 joker slot
An x2 would be 4.5x total.
It isnt better
Doubled 3x is 6x, no?
I’m talking conventional x3 and x2
Like seeing double and the trio
to contrast with current jokers
ramen and card sharp 😉
with polychrome on either of those regular jokers it’d be 4 more (6 * 1.5 = 9)
don’t get me wrong, it’d definitely be efficient, but not wildly so
Still though
2 jokner slots
Name me one such joker that is not lategame viable and that :
- is uncommon (as I said, x2 would be fine as a common, because indeed commons are typically jokers you keep around for a little while and sell when you get better ones)
- provides no form of permanent benefit that stays after it's sold (a Sixth sense for example is not a joker that you keep until late game, but the spectral cards as well as deleting the sixes add permanent benefits to your deck)
joker stencil lol
i guess joker stencil is theoretically lategame viable if you have one of those really silly builds where you somehow manage to get, like, three of em, but generally you've sold it for something better by ante 8
fair
that's pretty much the only one though (beyond the utter trash jokers like loyalty card)
I think people like loyalty card. you gotta be a bigbrain player to use it though.
and it [stencil] is a freaking x5 when you're lucky to get to pick it as your first joker, not a x2
consider the context of actually seeing this in a run in, like, ante 3. imo thats an instabuy.
well yeah but then it's viable lategame
in some ways you can think of this is a softer stencil. less onerous requirements, but also less of a benefit.
Well yeah but you'd rather see any of the x3s (which is why maybe it's these who need an nerf)
Stencil sucks, it took 2 hands to win with this insane setup
But yeah stencil really is just a joker you dump asap
I would put Ramen and Seeing Double in a similar state
Seeing Double is great
Its fine, but most of the time you would probably want to swap it wityh non 2x
even with my 4-5 card hand builds id rather have other sources of xmult, and its usually quick to go for a stronger source
In what world is a 2x mult bad, like what are you even using over it
3x mult
i like this idea but i do prefer it as a common
i cant imagine anything better than 4x mult
5x!!!
nah thats just too crazy
are there actually any cards that start at 5x mult?
stencil with no jokers technically
Same for 6x!
and 4x
And 7x
i guess with a negative stencil on black deck yeah
There is an actual 4x joker though
2
yeah, i was wondering about 5x though
8x too then with antimatter
Ermm 7!!! would be naneinf
actually itd be 28
double/triple/etc factorials are different than stacking factorials