#Penalty Notice
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I think that's a neat idea. Good late game when you need some X-Mult to round your build off and am mostly spending money rolling looking for stuff.
cavendish:
that also doesnt require getting rid of your econ completely
cavendish has a prerequisite, you have to take along gros michel and get the 1/6 chance, however long that takes
and then it has to spawn
getting rid of your econ is also not much of a downside considering you've got x3 mult now
it's not a permanent loss either
-$20 for x2 might work better, less polarizing
Not a joker you'd keep forever but it gets you out of a pinch
you're undervaluing how important a loss of $30 can be. wraith is already one of the worst spectrals
you're undervaluing how good x3 mult is
on average, driver's license probably costs you around 30 dollars (activating it from 0 cards) and it's a very solid rare
wraith is also absolutely not one of the worst spectrals
drivers license isnt that good though.
completely disagree
its never worth it
Wraith is only fine if you are already super poor
it's kinda like an investment, either that or you see it late and you've been using lots of enhancers already
rare joker for 2 dollars on ante 1 or get 2 gold cards and a glass card
Yeah, most of the time I see wraith it's mid-late game as I can actually afford to open spectrals
anyway back to the original suggestion, i think its pretty well balanced. you want to see it late to not tank your econ which i think is a nice contrast from all the jokers that are best super early
to be fair they havent said which rarity this would be. I dont really think this is stronger than the Trio or Drivers Lisence so it could very well be a Rare Joker
I think it's maybe better than the trio
trio is easily one of the better rares
true
I still think this would probbably work as a Rare but I also agree that x2, -20$ and rarity uncommon would probbably be a bit more healthy for the balance
x2 -20 would be worse than ramen which is already not great
I dont think ramen is bad but yea x2 -20 could potentially be too weak
definetly would need some testing to figure out the best possible version of this Joker but I like the general concept
I think it's a bird in hand vs bird in bush situation
what
the cost of the joker is handicapping your economy, but what could you want to buy better than a free x3 mult
handicapping is also an extreme term you can easily have enough cash that it's not a huge loss
30 dollars isnt free
Yeah, late game when your econ is good and or you just need some more xmult to finish off your build
Could pop off with wraith or judgement though
I feel like it’d suck with wraith
Set money to 0 and lose 30
It says lose 30 when obtained
it is because you lose it after you get the joker
the only downside is opportunity cost which
there's not a ton of opportunities better than x3 mult
what if you got this from judgement
Huge L
I think the issue here is that peopl who go "x3 isn't much" are those who keep thinking about this game in terms of endless, and those who say "it's busted" are those who rightfully reason about the -actual build up-, which IS this game.
Jokers aren't meant to be designed to be for endless, if they do then it's great, but think of how useful they are when -playing the actual game-.
And x3 when you're still building means you are easily at the next blind's cutoff value depending on which stake you're playing, so that's a huge boost.
Lol I didn't even think of that
That's hilarious
X3 isn't a gamewinning boost, I've still lost with Card Sharp, Blackboard, Drivers License, Cavendish, etc.
And the reason for the loss has usually been due to a lack of econ to get further scaling.
An econ penalty of -30 is pretty brutal, and basically means the shops do nothing unless you had over 30 gold to begin with
Think about the shops lost via Throwback, and the Shops lost via this. It creates a similar dynamic, and this one can only be mitigated by being rich, or being so lategame it doesn't matter
Yeah. -30 dollars is a lot of money. If you have like 50+ dollars, it doesn't matter that much. But if you find it and have 15 dollars, you will go to -15, which credit card is considered bad. Dropping into the negatives hurts a lot if you haven't solidified your build
3x is powerful, but doesn't solo win a game
in the worst case scenario you miss out on
2 antes worth of shops?
That's really bad. Missing 2 antes worth of shops is a run killer
Yeah. Unless your build is done, shops are your main form of growth usually
x3 mult is strong but it isnt a free win
Unless you’re scoring 400k per hand
Or 100k if you can play multipke
this is a lot harder to fit in a build than say, card sharp or blackboard
yeah and -30 bucks sucks but it's not a free loss
the only time I could see not taking it is if you have no flat mult
how is x3 uncondition mult harder to fit in a build than blackboard
Its not an insta lose but it could kill you
because of the opportunity cost? i'm gonna stop arguing about this because nothing new is being considered
this argument is basically just:
-30 can really ruin your economy for 50% of the game
but x3 mult is really good!!!!!!!!!!!
to paraphrase northernlion, it's not called "get all the money and set up a 401k-tro"
econ is an important aspect of the game
the shop is your main method of progression and if you spend 50% of your game not being able to access it then you cant progress as well
it wouldn't be too bad if you were already at like $25 or smth ig
maybe nerf to like 40 idk
I'd argue one of the best jokers in the game is vagabond, which hurts your econ badly
x3 mult will probably lead to you one-shotting blinds, which leads to more money from hands and the ability to save for interest
the difference is that vagabond actively helps you progress via deck manip
but you just said "vagabond helps you progress through deck manip"
how much deck manip do you have to get before it outpaces a flat x3
glass, steel?
xmult is progression
lucky?
also vagabond occasionally gives you hermit and temperance which can help you access stuff
ik its like a 1/10 but
I feel like everyone's downplaying x3 mult and upselling -30 dollars
it's not good but it's not absolutely run-destroying you can never buy anything again
x3 mult is basically -1 ante right (maybe -1.5 idk)
would you take that for $30
keep in mind thats without the extra time
maybe its 2 idk
how is x3 mult -1 ante
you basically 1/3 the blind requirements
lets say -2
you're also not paying 30 dollars you get it and then lose 30 dollars
which is a very important distinction
would you take card sharp as a rental joker and keep it for 3 antes? because this is strictly better
card sharp leeches of your money in that case
not the same
an upfront -30 is very different
immediately losing $30 is worse than losing $3 a round
^
but the econ is much worse
yeah but destroying your econ for a long time is usually not worth it
-3 every round is not roughly the same as just -30
you ever see that family guy clip, where they say
"peter, you can either have the boat, or the mystery box."
"The box, the box!"
"But what about the boat?"
"The boat is a boat. The box could be anything. It could even be a boat!"
This is the same to me
"x3 mult is x3 mult, but cash can buy anything. it could even buy the trio!"
if you are scoring 10k in ante 3 or so, destroying your econ up until like ante 5 to get to 30k leaves you pretty exposed
destroying your econ? if you're in ante 3 you've probably got like
idk 22 dollars? buying this will put you at -15
which is like 1 ante considering you'll be one-shotting blinds
lets assume you're at $25 and you buy this joker (also we'll assume you 1-shot every blind, and you purchase this after a boss)
end of small blind - $1
end of big blind - $8
end of boss - $17
end of small blind - $26
it turns out you get your money back after only 1 ante
not too bad
(assuming you started at 25)
i think this would fall off at higher stakes where your econ starts dying
that's also assuming you don't have any econ jokers
yeah that too
i feel like its still kindof brutal to just lose $30 if you end up getting this from something like temperance
you mean judgement?
judgement yeah
that's true, I don't think there are any jokers that have an immediate negative effect on pickup for that reason
not having punishments that affect you even after you sell it feels like a reasonable game philosophy
If you want to really hammer down the cost punishment, you could change how this works entirely. "If you enter a blind when this joker is inactive, pay 30$ to turn it active. When active this joker is x3 Mult."
This way if you get it with judgement, you don't pay the 30$ cost
It's only activated when you enter a blind.
Which, technically, also fits the theme. It's a penalty notice, and if you keep up, you pay the penalty.
there's no on purchase effect for that reason
yeh but this is when obtained, which includes that