#Calculations of rng
1 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
I fucked up btw
I need to remake it
Since it's in a row
It cant 3 out of 48
Because we need to pull next three for royal flush
right?
I am pretty sure I got it right, pulling 8 out of 52 is def right, and the top is actually just 4*5!, i.e. 4 times ways to pull a royal flush
And that decreases down the road
What's 8 out of 52
It should be right for mine fs
First pull
That is accounted for with 5!, all ways to pull out 5 cards
And then we multiply by amount of combinations of the rest three no?
No
And there are 4 sets of there 5 cards in the beginning
You can't pull one in twenty
I mean you can but that's different way of calculation
Wot lmao
Can you put my equation in wolfram tho?
lmfao
Is it anywhere close to yours
But just put it in tho
I can't scan it ðŸ˜
@rustic eagle write it
hdhahdha
Can you type it out, just use (2choose1)

hold on guys ima go read the newest one piece chapter xd
Are those 4s or 1s
Also you wrote 1 choose 52 the entire way, which is 0, there are 0 ways to pick 52 cards out a pool of 1
n c r, n on top, r at bottom
lmao
Wdym
Ill write it in a sec
How do i type it
(52choose1) is fine
Don't forget you can use ctrl c and ctrl v
also you can just do it yourself XD, wolfram alpha is right here
Aight
Wolfram alpha is a web service for free lol
I for some reason thought wolfram is paid
Wolfram Mathematica is
@rustic eagle how is it going
Not much, just waiting for my man(?) to try their method out
Uhh so how do i multiply there?
Just *?
So i type 52choose1*51choose1 etc?
@rustic eagle shouldn't it be like that
Maybe i missed sth let me read some theory lmao
Why would that be?
But I think it should be right
Is this your idea?
No
Or is your think a single pull
You are choosing 23, which is why I am confused
The nCr method is desired pulls/possible pulls, your total possible pull is getting 23 cards
Yes I know, I thought you were confused and trying to see what you misunderstood
And my case is counted only for not pulling the rest of needed royal flushes in first hand
Also 23 is right, 8+5+5+5, 15+8 = 23
Wait
one sec i fkd up
Hdhhahajaka
DUDE STOP CONFUSING ME
you are making me doubt if two + two is four
HAHHAH
OK THIS IS THE FINAL VERSION
four flushes in a row not counting the 3 cards we pull first time
Or should we count like in a row row?
only 20 cards
Can you elaborate on what each number means
Mhm
4! is amount of combinations in which we pull our royal flushes
All possible orders to pull 4 royal flushes
n 32C3 is the three cards we pull first hand that shouldn't be any of the ones needed for the rest of royal flushes
club diamond spade heart
heard club spade diamond, etc
yes
But you're not timesing it by the chance to actually get one
@civic sun dont think thats correct
pulling 2 specific cards in a row would be 1/52choose1 x 1/51choose1, no?
no
how so
well it is but isn't it the same as 1/52*1/51
Cause like, this makes no sense to me. You have to guarantee that each hand you pull one royal flush, you have to calculate by hand
@civic sun whats the chance of triggering wheel of fortune twice in a row?
base chance is 1/4
1/16
What is your line of thought for that then
so yeah
I don't see why shouldn't it work for me, do you think multiplying by 24 is not needed?
On the first hand, we draw 8 cards, 52c8, of which there are 5! ways to pull a specific royal flush, and there are 4 royal flushes
why wouldnt it be 1/52* 1/51
And afterwards, we pull 5 more cards, and this time we only have 3 royal flushes left
Diff. equation, same result, clearer
Repeat until yes
actually first card would be 20/52 then 2nd would be 4/51
Is the answer different?
it is
It seems logical
Congrats you came to my conclusion
basically
Which just so happens that 20*4*3*2*1 is exactly 4*5!
Because they represent the same thing
(Very simple to see)
So i just didn't count for first card being any of 20?
Uh and that pulling a huge hand of 23 is different from 8,5,5,5
Because in a choose 23, you could get all aces, which is not a royal flush
no idea how u got such conclusion
That looks really funny, but I'm still not sure what's going on here
Like, what are you calculating
fr
why are u deviding devisions by devisions
it fucked up the way it showed
@civic sun still not the answer
Where does it represent getting 4 royal flushes?
It has been surely it for couple o' min by now
HAHAHHA
how can the last one be not it tho
any of 20 cards we need is good to pull in first hand as first one
then only 12
Wait it should be 15
This is the one
if it's not it's joever idfk how to do it any other way
Oh and @solid crest I must mention that all this neglects the possibility that the initial 8 cards had parts of the next royal flush. While, again, ofc, it won't change how likely it is by any significant amount, it is just something to consider
@rustic eagle how much did you get?
I'm asking a math teacher for their take. If I can't I'll see if I can grab a professor
why you don't account for the rest three cards in first hand?
in your equation you can grab the rest of the flush cards no?
Because then it is conditional probability, and the number of branches will explode
We're basically asserting that the first hand's 3 cards don't have any parts of a royal flush
Also look at your bottom part
You pull 8 cards first hand yet after this you count as of you pulled 5
Shouldnt it be 44Choose5 after 52Choose8 and changing the rest too
But yeah asking teacher is op for sure
Wait
I think i got it
But not it's too much...
Basically the difference with your answer is 32Choose3 @rustic eagle
That's what I am counting on for not pulling the rest of flush cards in first hand
But why does it bump up probability
Hm
I see why
Hm
Idk that's my final answer
did yall come up with a conclusion
This seems feasible but we are not accounting for not pulling rest of flush cards in 3 cards of first 8
I don't really get why this is higher probability than yours tho @rustic eagle
It should be lower
math is not mathing
Calculations of rng
hands and discards used are accounted for.
@rustic eagle
question
about getting stuff in a row of the same suit
why is it calculated like that
@rustic eagle
my man disappeared
Not really, I just have nothing to say