odd mortar
And death can’t even save you from being used by this machine to generate profit.
You have no right to say that, when the actual representatives of W. Szymborska said it was okay. It may be inconceivable to you, but some people do welcome being AI'd in some form or another (Gwern's reasons aren't the same Rusinek gives for Szymborska, but I hope someone actually saying it out loud will pre-empt any accusation of dishonesty).
rain spindle
> And death can’t even save you from being used by this machine to generate prof...
Excuse me, but I could be married to someone for fifty years and that still wouldn’t give them the right to lease my likeness after my death, or even the moral grounds to argue that’s what I wanted myself.
The only reason anything we do in life matters is because we took a limited amount of time we have on this planet and decided to make use of it in a particular way. Saying that we can resurrect the dead from the past to use them for whatever purpose we want today makes a mockery of everything they did while alive.
It’s literally interjecting “the last word” against someone who can no longer respond. It’s stealing people who can’t say no any more.
odd mortar
Excuse me, but I could be married to someone for fifty years and that still wouldn’t give them the right to lease my likeness after my death, or even the moral grounds to argue that’s what I wanted myself.
Well, yes, because that's not what you want yourself. My point is that individuals' desires are to be respected, even if you think they're wrong, and that Rusinek knows better than you what Szymborska would have wanted.
torpid oar
What even is the point of this? I want to hear other humans not robots
rain spindle
I refuse to spend time on anything that someone else didn’t even take the time to create in the first place. I literally dropped out of school and filed a federal lawsuit when my professor told me he used Chat-GPT to make his syllabus.