#Real Quidditch Rules
69 messages · Page 1 of 1 (latest)
heres the thing, they made it 30 points so they can balance the game out, and we dont want a single game to take 3 months.
As long as it is this easy to find and follow the snitch, the game takes 5 minutes max. Of course, until the snitch is caught, the players in other positions have a great job to widen the gap by 150 points.
For example:
FACTS
You could have a mode or something that is how the legit game of quidditch is played…
7v7 and the snitch takes more time to start flying around so let’s say if a team is up by 80 or something then the snitch comes out , who ever catches it gets 150 points and the game ends
It wouldn’t take that long probably 10 mins or 15 min at max… fortnite matches are 20-25 mins for example
I would say have the snitch come out at the start but make it harder to catch
no snitch trail but it leaves rings when being chased
I like that
And no indicator on the screen for where it has gone after a sharp turn
It would need faster movement, more erratic movement, and to be an actual game of hide and seek.
The snitch as is, even without a max speed broom (6/7 max speed) you can stay right behind the snitch, and even if you get thrown from where it is, you can almost instantly refind it, even without the snitch marker (I didn't realize they added one to the game until the 4th or 5th time playing seeker, as I swaped to it late and the bot wasn't on top of it)
That's a lot of changes for a special mode, though a lot of HP fans keep asking for it, so... it might be worth it for a non competitive mode (if only they did this for the campaign...)
You could simply hard coded it to have the snitch show up after like 5 minutes or something if no seeker found it before. Obviously they would have to make it harder to find, and also harder to catch
I find the snitch more often on keeper than I do on seeker, but I can't do anything about finding it. (But that might be due to the fact I've only played seeker once in PvP because yay fill being keeper)
The snitch needs completely reworked on its movements to make the seeker work harder for it to earn their points so people will stop complaining.
Ending the game from snitch is dumb, stop being a nerd, not games plays like its imitation. That's why video games are a "simulation".
It's hard if the counter Seeker and Beater does their jobs. Wtf are you guys talking about.
The snitch is to predictable. That is why it need reworked. Put the current snitch in a competitive environment where players have mastered their position. This snitch is to easy.
How if a Pro counter Beater is aggressive and the Pro counter Seeker shoving. That's what makes the snitch hard, not the snitch itself.
because all you have to do is be close to the snitch grow the meter. also counter measures from the pro seeker can come in as well making it easy if they just stay in the area
What?
I'm not understanding what you're talking about.
One Seeker should make it harder for the other and the Beater should make it harder for the opposing Seeker.
I have played many many matches now and the only issues i have really had was the beaters. Also the beater should not only focus on the seeker. The seeker should have a hard enough time dealing with the other seeker if they are good enough and the snitch. The snitch is supposed to be hard to catch even without any outside forces. That is why the snitch needs reworked (at least for 6v6). The snitch needs be more sporadic and less predictable. Also if me wanting this game that is based off of something that can be referenced and taken note from to be more accurate, makes me a nerd then so be it. I will not apologize for wanting the game to be more like the book.
5 and 6 player it’s not enough. Sorry 3
Then let's remove the obvious clear rules in other sports games so that it is more playable. Quidditch also has clear rules set by its creator. The important thing is to draw the player's attention and make a playable game without "changing the rules".
Honestly, I'm making an assumption here, you sound like a nerd that wants the game more like actually quidditch, because to any game logic, they Beater aggravating the Seeker makes perfect sense so that the ally Seeker can relax.
thank you
Lmao I didn't even read where you said the part about the book and I assumed correctly 😂 🤣
You're just a nerd who wants it like the book.
The beater still does not need to hard focus on the seeker is the point.
Why not? Because the books weren't like that?
We need 3 Chaser, 2 Beater, 1 Keeper and 1 Seeker.
No because it doesnt make sense for the team. you are taking a team member who could be taking out the keeper so that you can score easier and hard focusing someone who has a lower chance of scoring. Are you stupid.
Exactly! Not for other chasers and keeper. Only toxic for seeker
Game’s need 2 beater
Why ?
Bro do you hear any other sports game getting rule changes from their source material because it makes the easier? NO. The game is set the way it is for a reason. You dont see a madden game saying well the reciever can only catch the ball but not run with it because it would be more balanced that way because that is not how the game is played
Bro, stop being a nerd and think, the game logic is literally perfect. I'll explain:
The game of football is not played with 12 people, right?
nah make it 10 for the game to better
Nope, it’s not actually. Unless events, ranked games and updates are made, everyone will get bored and quit the game.
Acutally volta is better LOL
Say the enemy team is wrecking your team in the 3v3 Chaser, scoring left and right. The snitch comes out, they have to send one guy on Seeker, boom, it's a 2v2. Then, you send you Beater to stir up trouble for the Seeker, boom, 1v1 keeper vs keeper. Now you have a chance to make a comeback. The logic is PERFECT.
I think that's why the Magic Awakened game is being shut down.
Yes. When was the last time you had to use the analog stick to aim and throw a pass in madden? When was the last time you pressed a key to dribble in 2k. It's a simulation of the true sport, you sound dumb.
I don't think you've read the books and watched the movies. The game works that way anyway, especially because of the Slytherin team!
Ok your arguing for 3v3 I am arguing for 6v6. I said that at the beginning. Pay attention child and you might learn something. The way it is right now will not work for a competitive gameplay. Stuff gets left up to bots too much for that and that is why competitive will be on 6v6. Now In 6v6 the snitch needs reworked is what I said because in thosee settings the beaters should not be hard focusing the seekers.
It doesn't have to be like the books to be good, you guys are literally just nerding out. Not giving any reason why it doesn't work besides, "well the books didn't do it that way". You guys are crashouts, the books and movies are scripted, so the balance is as good as the author makes it. You guys are ridiculous.
your going to argue semantics because your actual argument is lacking. The games still do exactly what the actual sport does. you sound dumb arguing otherwise.
6v6 doesn't make sense because the seeker character doesn't spawn until the snitch does, so what, one player is just going to be spectating half the game, yah sound crazy.
And I bet they'll probably have the snitch out the whole match and you guys are going to complain.
No I won't because that is how the game is supposed to be.
Let's chill down with the name calling in here
That's my favorite part though.
my bad bro. your right I was out of pocket
I wasn't hurt.
Still against the rules
I object.
Rejected
Thanks for playing along.
Yeah 6v6 is stupid though.
Your argument is invalid. You have no actual basis to go off of for why 6v6 will be bad. You are just a casual player and I accept that. enjoy your day and happy games.
they can add special team moves that add more points then they can add that the snitch is caught 150 points and boom game ended
Yes they can. But they didn't. I hope they do.
the rules of quidditch was written by a writer, so you can see the flaw there no? second, this is a videogame and have to be balanced in some ways. wait some time and gonna appear a mod with original rules. here have to be fun for everyone.
THANK YOU. I almost lost faith in humanity. An author can LITERALLY write that quidditch is balanced but for a competition like a videogame you can't just go off the authors description, she knows nothing about balancing a video game.
@frosty stag jajaja exactly, even if there is a bit unbalance, i have to say, we are in a moment a bit toxic of videogames, all have to be ranked, all have to be measured. and at the and always gonna be unbalanced for one or the other... when competitive people understand that life is what really matters, good games, and good games communities gonna emerge again. 🙂