Discovered uiverse a few days ago, was pretty excited, especially as the first challenge I'm participating restricts modifying HTML & encourages creativity using vanilla CSS without relying on easy workarounds in JS, SASS, etc.
That said, had no idea my submission would need to be reviewed before it could be voted on, let alone it would take so long to get reviewed.
Voting has been open for a few hours, yet my submission is still not visible/elligible for voting. Based off counting submissions vs visible entries, I'm guessing I'm not the only one.
Currently, there are 67 submissions, yet only 44 are able to be voted on.
(I assume the little human icon is total amount of submissions, as there is no alt text on hover...)
Suggestion: A final "review time" grace period before voting begins, so that all submissions can be voted on at the same time.
While the challenge was fun and welcome, styling the card was a bit frustrating, as I didn't know what the rules/restrictions were beyond "styling the card in your own unique way without altering the HTML." Ex; didn't know font imports weren't allowed until the submission editor warned me. (I coded locally...so lucky I thought to test it first.)
Before I started, I scanned the site for rules, details, etc. & couldn't find anything.
After submitting, & encountering the "review" flag, I scanned the site again, saw the link "Post Guidelines"... hidden in the footer... thought it referred to posts in a community.
After reviewing the notion, I'm still not sure if it applies to CSS Challenges, submitting outside of challenges, or both? I'm afraid I broke a lot of rules for my submission without realizing it. ex: em vs rem
Suggestion: Present clear & detailed guidelines in a more UX friendly way, &/or locally hosted static pages in the navigation.
Additionally, basic suggestions for challenges would be welcome, like recommended size of cards. I had to use web-inspect on uiverse to try & guess.