I can see where you come from in terms of looking at it from that angle. Prompting for a particular feel which allows for generalization in appreciation without needing to specify so many details in order to get to the point of "Do I like this, and do I justify it's creation?" (Generalization not in negative connotation btw, I mean in more of a "Not spending so much time organizing thoughts in risk of feeling overwhelmed while deciding our appreciation level on a song").
My brain naturally just starts critically thinking in terms of the whole "analyzing what I deem as organic and authentic in the project down to each specific part and what that means for the song to me."
As for feeling, this is definitely an interesting topic. Let's say for example, someone wrote all the lyrics themselves, but the instrumental and vocals are a.i generated. I personally can pull the emotion from the authentic story that the lyrics tell; because it comes from the human mind. But, I still feel that disconnect; because it's not being sung by a person. Maybe the a.i lead vocal can simulate an emotional performance well; but that vocal doesn't truly comprehend, or have a grasp of the story from the lyrics. What if those lyrics are deeply personal to the person? The a.i can't gauge the gravity, the emotional weight of a certain phrase, and what it truly means deep down in that moment. The best it can do is try to "be human." I'm curious to ask what your thoughts on that are?
I've always liked to believe that even through listening to a recorded lead vocal, the conveying of the emotional journey those vocals can take us on is still tangible, even though it's being heard through playback. With A.I, I feel like we lose that aspect. Maybe the vocals can recreate an echo of that push and pull a real human performance can execute; but that disconnected feeling is still there, and the listening experience feels incomplete, and unsatisfactory to me