💡┃suggestions-web

[indigo rivet]

A self-induced coma.

[split egret]

Behaviour has changed repeatedly such that it became more likely to ignore instructions. It used to be better at following specific directions, it didn't change its code all by itself, therefore those changes have to have been made intentionally by programmers.
You're making a whole lot of assumptions about what I do or don't know and what I do or don't expect. I'm not expecting to press a button and magically get an exact specific output. What would be nice would be if it would include specific things (certain instruments, structural elements etc) that I directly ask for and NOT include things that I specifically asked it to exclude. And I am finding that actually getting that level of compliance with style instructions, is getting harder and harder (ie, it's worse at following instructions than it used to be)

[spiral bronze]

May not be all the answers you need, but they do have a queue system for playing songs in the website. If you hit the three-dot menu, it has an "Add to Queue" option. That's the menu on the right when you're playing a song and you hit the button just to the left of the thumbs-up-thumbs-down buttons.

[ripe summit]

I'm not denying that possibility, tracks may really does sound similar to some existing songs. I fully support having a copyright-checking system. However, would it be possible to tell us which track the song matched with?

What I want is more transparency: which track did it match, and which part of our song caused the issue? Ideally, this should be shown automatically in the system instead of making us submit support tickets every time just to find out what triggered the copyright check.

[gusty copper]

A function I'm requesting is, if the upload audio matches an existing recording, the user will be prompted if you want or not to continue uploading the audio as normal, with the condition that the original audio will be pribate and only pribate. Covers, mashups, etc. Will be private by default unless the user will change each of them

[obsidian raptor]

yoo u still use this?

[quartz hare]

Teach rather than dismiss

[sweet zephyr]

I'm getting sick of seeing that myself.

[pale kite]

I just got restricted can no longer upload original works. And support is useless all i get is an AI response saying help is on the way.

[sweet zephyr]

SUNO is marketing itself as a DAW creative tool, sure it has those elements but what it truly lacks is consistency, every tune should have its unique seed values that if given again will faithfully reproduce that track, but it can't, even reworking a tune I have generated in suno that had lyrics I didn't ask for, taking them out of the track, changed the track and the resulting file sounded nothing like the original, it started off the same but I noticed there were big differences, its like its got a mind of its own and lacks understanding or the importance of consistency.

[quartz hare]

This copyright stuff is so easily fixed tbh, Transparency, unless its a shareholder decision, then we kinda are both stuck

[pale kite]

No I mean i cant upload anything I got hit with a message. "Account restricted from uploading"

[quartz hare]

Probably should've waited, tedious and pointless ik, but at least youd still be able to make music

[pale kite]

waited for what?

[quartz hare]

Wish you the best of luck.

[quartz hare]

For support, or an announcement

Any info really

[pale kite]

Why would I have to wait. It was out of nowhere.

[quartz hare]

¯_(ツ)_/¯

Its just how some things work, patience and time

[ripe summit]

I think the main issue is legal risk. If their training data includes copyrighted music, fair use is still unclear. Since they can’t fully guarantee the model won’t generate something too close to copyrighted material, restricting uploads is probably their safest option for now. I don’t really disagree overall, but I doubt they’ll ever reveal which song was matched. You could generate something from prompts, re-upload it, and suddenly have it flagged as copyrighted.

[sweet zephyr]

There is no "Training needed" because databases of signatures to files that are copyright are stored in a big database the companies reference for DRM materials like youtube as one example, copyright checks by scanning to see if any part of your upload contains copyright material.
So their training is not needed, its a simple signature check.

[ripe summit]

I don’t think it’s that simple. I’ve had random piano pieces I played myself get flagged for copyright before, so I suspect they may be using their own trained detection system, not just a basic signature database.

Some tracks that Suno flagged as matching existing works showed no issues at all when I checked them with other detection tools.

My guess is that they know some parts of their training data may include copyrighted material or questionable sources, so they trained a separate detection system using that information. But whether any of that counts as fair use is still unclear to me.

[old glade]

Delta Blues consists of basically the same three chords and has done for 100+ years. What's the point of SUNO now? It's useless with these restrictions.

[sweet zephyr]

Then there is this issue https://suno.com/s/tirsomJJoiR2txoi and it is anything but an ambient relaxation piece, still, about half way, breaks in to beats.