#other_ip_topics
1 messages ยท Page 22 of 1
He has to use MLOD's indeed.
I see the picture
What if tell you there is a custom made tools?
Weren't you just telling me I'm making up rules? Now you make up tools that don't exist (yet)?
Picture is simply usual to this channels - aggressive response on anything that is out of your argument.
- You did that, that's wrong
- Look that's how I did that, that's fine
THAT'S WRONG
Dude, you are violating the EULA and are trying to justify it by just ignoring what is being told to you and trying to move the topic to different aspects
You called that a paywall
A paywall to a link you don't own
Do I seriously need to quote you on that?
As I said I'm done arguing at this point. Do I take your response as a "I don't care, I'll continue doing it as I have been"?
As I said multiple times take that illegal product of your shop. Its still up right now.
The issue is I don't care if it's going to be taken down. However I don't see any arguments on why.
Listen there is a world outside where people are not obligated to do you what you think personally.
Its not what I think. Its the EULA that gives you rules about what you can do and what you cannot do.
Pretty clear rules.
And I haven't seen any part of EULA saying that selling a google drive link is violation.
Maybe for Google, yes.
Didn't touch that yet.
Okey I have enough of this. Feel free to continue playing stupid elsewhere. I explained you half a dozen times and you still pretend like you didn't understand me
!ban @lilac sparrow @tidal bridge 0 armaservices.net, illegal monetization of Arma 3 Tools.
*fires them railguns at @lilac sparrow and @tidal bridge* ร_ร
thank you @inland sphinx
๐ฟ
I give my condolences to any Arma 3 shops that LEGALLY sell models and other content, and I'm happy for the Content creators that can pay their morning coffee from that.
The sad truth is that such legal schemes will never work, because there will be people like above who make it impossible for such a endevor to not be instantly attacked by people who had experiences with the above.
And as an additional factor of course the people, who will just not care about the effort you put into your work, and the moral restraint of not just giving away for free what others worked hard for and deserve to get something back for, who will just steal the content and give it away for free.
Or.. as above, just sell it to make their own profit from the content they just took from others who are not in a position to fight back.
Or people like the below
!ban 436546389795930122 0 armaservices.net, illegal monetization of Arma 3 Tools, ban evasion 199938370338553856
*fires them railguns at @unreal canopy* ร_ร
@sleek lantern good luck. I hope you get your right.
woah @sleek lantern that website is so bad
they're literally selling a 3 lines Eventhandler code for 11$
can the BI legal dep. not do anything with this?
Uh oh, I'm too late to the party and I only find the site is really disgusting
go dedmen!
@brave knot saw some people selling a crappy tool for 90$ that could pretty much do nothing at all and was known to crash a lot
the arma life community is just weird
I'm astonished
I'm astonished
Wait until i tell you that people actually paid that price and complained
I'm in a dilemma
I would hope its just children but that would mean these people scam children
but if they aren't it means that grown adults though this was a good idea
i personally just saw that and thought dafuq
ya knau, moma needs ta wurk for dem monez
https://bytex.market/products/item/qbjysjbthekqizp85dzp/Speedcameras
Here is a good example (the only one I could find...) of how to do it right.
No models behind a paywall, the models are truly freely available for anyone.
But the buying incentive are the scripts that give all the functionality to make the model useful for anything other than just a static prop.
And scripts you can legally sell and put behind a paywall.
That site also sells retextures, original content in png format.
The owner of that site actually cares AND checks what the vendors sell, and when told about something wrong they actually take it down as they are supposed to.
But as you can see, they are basically selling no models at all, because you cannot protect models and as I wrote above that it wouldn't make sense after the first one who bought it puts it up for free somewhere.
I'm sorry that I'd have to acknowledge the rules properly by then, but let me ask something: selling things that are made from Arma 3 Tools will violate EULA of Arma 3 Tools?
Yes
Arma 3 tools cannot be involved in something that will later on be monetized in any way (except if you are approved for monetzation by BI themselves)
so you can sell configs? ๐ค
as text files. technically yes
in thier raw form.
Though (unrelated to EULA) configs are not as clear cut. Due to potentially being a derivative, and as it contains classnames from other mods potentially
Thus sqfs (which is essentially text files), png retextures are legal to sell because aren't made from Arma 3 Tools right?
Yes
cpp, like sqf is just a file extension, the contents if written by you, are yours, the difficulty with defining those is with any inheritances used within or reliance on other game functions (engine or scripted) to function themselves, those could probably fall under derivative, but they are reliant on existing game content to work.
And like any inheritance, you would inherit any licences the original class or script/function are licenced under.
I doubt anyone ever went to court for someone quoting part of a book you wrote and giving credit to the original.
Which is basically what a config.cpp with inheritance is, right?
Due to requiredAddons, you are inherently crediting the source of the class you mention lower and inherit
in that situation your aren't crediting, you are requiring those inheritance for your thing to function, without them your' software will not work.
are .cpp files created by BI?
my main bible to follow when I think about monetization is "if Arma and BI would never exist" could I still do my job without issues?
I am not a layer - but I just had this topic of IP rights discussed with lawyers at university, so I will add my two cents to this debate.
It does not matter if need arma 3 to make use out of a script. the contents on an .sqf or .cpp file (assuming you wrote that all on your own) are 100% covered by the copyright laws and you are entitled to do anything you want with it. You are the author, you hold all rights. Copyright can only protect the expression of an idea, not the idea itself.
About the usage of certain sequences like "cfgvehicles". You can not, under no european law "copyright" this. You can not copyright charcaters or words, period. You CAN copyright trademarks to distinguish your goods, but trademarks do not apply to scripts. If you were to arrange a certain amount of words in a way where you invested interlectual work into it and it becomes a creation of your mind you are able to copright it then - but only then.
citing text in a book and referencing it is very different from requiring someone else's code for yours to function.
in the book analogy they could very easy change a citation for get their point across, with code you generally cannot, especially more-so where proprietary software (closed source) is used.
in that situation your aren't crediting
Well requiredAddons states the name of the mod where the class you're inheriting comes from.
Can I copy an existing cpp, change one line and say "i made this" - No, because this edit does not qualify as enough to be your interlectual work
Can i start a new text file from scratch adding only what i need for my own creation and do what ever i want with it? - Yes
About the usage of certain sequences like "cfgvehicles". You can not, under no european law "copyright" this. You can not copyright charcaters or words, period.
I would consider (although teeechnically not really true) CfgVehicles as part of the "Arma config programming language" and you cannot copyright a language.
I meant more things like B_Soldier_F but there what you wrote above applies
Well requiredAddons states the name of the mod where the class you're inheriting comes from.
again, that's not a credit/citation, thats a function of software to inherit values from another container.
But indirectly you state where thats from ๐ค
to inherit values from another container
Thats inheritance, I meant specifically requiredAddons in CfgPatches
maybe the only thing you can copyright is function since they have BIS in them, although its currently owned by BI...?
And in the end if something seems similar and you claim "this was my creation, so this is my IP" a court will decide if the other party did indeed copy you or if the result was unavoidable to be the same. there are only x certain ways to achieve a function within a programming language and if the only way is to put x in that exact order then NO you can not claim copyright on it
That's like
"For this article I used the Book ABCDEF and the Book WXYZ
bla bla bla : ABC_blabla
bla bla bla : WXY_blabla
"
requiredAddons mean you require addon_A for your addon to function, it is still inheritance, just not class inheritance.
And on top of all of this, programming languages (if you want to call SQF one) CAN NOT be coprighted in the EU and not in the US as well, period.
maybe the only thing you can copyright is function since they have BIS in them
You mean trademark, cuz of the name?
"Arma 3" for example would be trademarked. Don't know if the BI/BIS abbrev is, I don't think so ๐ค
If you want to read more on why programming languages can not be copyrighted and what part of a program you write can be, give the GOOGLE VS ORACLE case a go
Is ARMA 3 trademarked? I know, the trademark explicitely says no matter the capitalization btw
not the language, but the contents can be put under licence, otherwise things like GPL would not exist.
you fools
didn't you know you can just use "I do not own this content all credits go to authors"
for legal reasons thats a joke
Is ARMA 3 trademarked?
yeah
+1 for the Google v Oracle court case, seems to be addressing what Uro was referring to
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4807:8dewa8.2.23 if that link works
Actually. Arma 3 doesn't seem to be.
Arma itself yes, Arma II yes, Arma 3 I can't find ๐ค
Session has expired it says
http://tmsearch.uspto.gov
basic sarch
Term: "Bohemia Interactive"
Field: "Owner Name"
Huh in late 2012 BI had the trademark for "DAYZ" use in "Bord Games" ๐ค
Do consider than not only are you dealing with EU law, but also US law.
Additionally, one must be aware that even if you are doing something that is (on paper) 100% legal, do not think that you can't be arrested/taken to court and prosecuted for it.
Interestingly Bohemia just say that "ARMA" and "Bohemia Interactive" when they make trademark statements... e.g. see the keyboard overlay in ARMA 3
heh, just found this https://euipo.europa.eu/copla/bulletin/data/detail/ctm/018224707/2020_075
wonder what ORIGINAL WAR is, was filed 09/04/2020
๐ค
tried to find it on the US trademark site but can't find it.
But I found
MAKE GYROS NOT WAR
EN-9-Computer programs, recorded; Computer programs, downloadable; Computer software, recorded; Games software; Computer game software, downloadable; Downloadable computer game software via a global computer network and wireless devices; Software programs for video games; Computer game software downloadable from a global computer network; Computer game software for use on mobile and cellular phones; Computer game software, recorded; Downloadable computer games; Computer software applications, downloadable; Games software for use with video game consoles.
EN-41-Provision of on-line computer games; Providing a computer game that may be accessed network-wide by network users; Electronic games services, including provision of computer games on-line or by means of a global computer network; Providing on-line information in the field of computer gaming entertainment; Game services provided online from a computer network.
EN-42-Design of computer game software; Installation and maintenance of computer programs; Duplication of computer programs; Computer programming of computer games; Computer programming of video games; Computer software design.
Sounds like a game ๐
it's only filed, not registered yet
And LOL @inland sphinx Note the capitalization ๐คฃ http://tmsearch.uspto.gov/bin/showfield?f=doc&state=4807:x7qg0k.7.97
found it ๐คฃ
Those links don't work Grahame
I was right all along
They need cookie context. But you can click the link in top left, the TSDR that gets a usable link
Serial number is 77905961
It says ARMA
Yep... ARMA 3 ๐
on TSDR its only Arma, without the 3
I win! ๐
btw... that steam shop link is the actual game called "Original War", published by BI
No... It is just ARMA... But it is capitalized
Weird that they get a trademark for that now ๐ค for a 19 year old game
probably bought the IP?
No... It is just ARMA... But it is capitalized
Notice anything concerning capitalization?
Yeah... the standard character mark ignores it
probably bought the IP?
Afaik Altar Games merged into BI looong ago
But note that the image in the trademark entry was submitted by BI as an example of their mark
Makes sense that they trademark just ARMA though... Then they don't need to get a new one for each new game I'd guess
same on euipo, it's only ARMA they have registered,.
The standard character mark says that "The mark consists of standard characters without claim to any particular font style, size, or color" though
covers all bases
And as for applicability to any ARMA game... here is the image BI submitted as a specimen http://tsdr.uspto.gov/documentviewer?caseId=sn77905961&docId=SPE20170201152731#docIndex=2&page=1
Uh amazon
That's ArmA, was published by multiple
505 Games, IDEA Games, Licomp.Empik.Multimedia, Morphicon, akella, Atari SA
there is also images from Steam pages in there Grahame
they are probably just supporting evidence to back up filing.
Yeah. Standard procedure on trademarks
Amazing what else has been trademarked for ARMA... including gear for horses... (You can use the same name if in business not claimed by the other trademark owners, e.g. I could potentially open a bar called ARMA, and then two more called ARMA II and ARMA 3 ๐ )
ARMA III ๐
wait did they copyright F?
Interestingly they trademarked DayZ for PC games... then had to do a later one for consoles. Bit of a lack of forethought there ladz ๐
Someone seems unhappy ๐ค (censored profanity)
If anyone wants to read up how i never said anything against his google drive link and he just started playing stupid and pretending to not have heard me say that over and over again, I intentionally left almost (links that promote his illegal webshop were removed) the full conversation up for people to read
I'd follow it, and it was clear to me what you tried to explain him... He just tried to bypass the EULA which he obviously failed, and couldn't give any reason on why that would be legal (since you can't).
Now we wait for BI to take actions against that shop ๐
People say we are unfair by just banning people, instead of trying to tell them what they did wrong and helping them to fix it.
This is a example of what happens when you try to reason with such people.
We now have the same outcome as if I had just banned him without saying anything, with the only difference being that due to me trying to explain to him he's now launching personal attacks against me to try to hide his failure in trying to justify his wrongdoings.
He also proceeded to compare what happened here and racial discrimination... This is just the perfect example of why lifer's rep. is so low.
And yet you've been incredibly patient with him, the hammer usually drops way faster than that ๐
So now that he was banned... is there going to be further consequences to his monetization of the a3 tools?
BI legal will take care of the rest
Righto
whoever handles this legal lifer stuff for BI every day must really want to die
BI legal will take care of the rest
Sooo a meanly worded letter with a frowny face?
Assuming that this is on the same level of the punishment that anzus has gotten
(the punishments that I'm aware of that is)
I dunno what the 'getting BE turned off for a day or two' equivalent is for a digital shop though
I suspect that they go for the hoster in this case tbh... "someone is illegally selling stuff on your computers, fix it"
Yeah if they actually do anything it'll props be against the hoster
I broke our rules
Messages of banned members are also considered as spam.
oh no, you must ban yourself now? ๐
I removed the rule violators post as a punishment ๐
anyway, the guy's spending way too much time on it
@wintry yoke
not everyone can be a cold hearted b**ch like you are ๐
slight ree
You may as well be saying " but racism was ok in my day". Its **not **ok and never has been. Neither is content theft.
@old jay Imagine comparing a phenomena that has oppressed millions of people to someone retexturing/reuploading content for a 7 year old videogame. Iโm not saying I condone reuploading/breaking IP violations, but it is incredibly cringeworthy to treat these two things like two sides of the same coin.
You are absolutely correct, they are NOT equal. I just chose an obvious example to highlight the difference.
YEAH!!! The workshop crawler is working again! Now I get to spend too much time sending people who can't follow simple freakin instructions DMCAs! It's not like I wanted to be in a good mood today anyways. pssh!
too bad you can't drone strike them instead huh?
DMCA notice via drone strike. You might be on to something there.
Amazon would do it
A question/thought I will put here, but be assured I will also contact BI and others beforehand.
As some may have seen in #community_wiki am I currently working on a (unofficial) offline tool with data provided from the wiki (with help from Lou).
And even though it's a community wiki (for and by the community) do I still believe that the contents belong to BI in all forms, meaning IP, copyright and the whole legal package.
While reading through the EULA and "Game Content Usage Rules" at the BI website I noticed the following:
All title, ownership rights and intellectual property rights in and to the Program and any and all copies thereof (including but not limited to any titles, computer code, themes, objects, methods of operation, any related documentation, and addons incorporated into the Program) are owned by Bohemia Interactive a.s. (the "Licensor") or its licensors. The Program is protected by the Czech copyright laws, international copyright treaties and conventions and any other applicable laws. All rights are reserved.
~ https://www.bohemia.net/community/licenses/bohemia-interactives-tools-end-user-license
You may develop your own game content, tools, plug-ins and other utilities or services for both noncommercial and commercial use as long as it is your original creation, without using the content, tool or any other intellectual property of Bohemia Interactive.
~ https://www.bohemia.net/community/game-content-usage-rules
And the mention of the "Sui Generis Database Rights" in the APL licences, which basically forbids any copy and/or modification to database content.
This scares me a bit... since it basically means that it would be impossible to release anything related to an offline wiki...
That said; nothing will be released until BI gives their explicit permission, although I wonder if there are any other things I should keep in mind before publishing.
Thank you Dedmen! That is exactly the answer I was looking for.
So in short; as long as it remains non-commercial (which it will) it's OK to use the content from the wiki in the tool.
Although it doesn't confirm the EULA and other rules BI has set up, so I will contact BI anyway just to be 100% safe.
although the functions/configs are from Arma, and as the EULA states that the methods of operation and documentation are part of the IP, hence my confusion
A computer language is open afaik if they open it up... There was some discussion of that earlier
Either way, check with Karel and you'll probably be sorted
I'll just keep working on it till I have a working demo, send that to BI for review and the question for permission and then it should all be good to go.
@meager saffron why do you think that it is okay for people to steal others content (which arguably has way more time involved than some simple screenshots)... Just curious
taking something that is not yours against the wishes and EULA or license of the product/content
just the most standard definition of stealing
funny you say you guys dont chat but you all use the same dEfIne sTeALinG line
thats the only reason to ask for a definition lol
is if you already have an opinion and know a bit about the subject
because clearly you dont think its stealing
its a screenshot using stolen content
is driving a stolen car wrong if you know its stolen and someone just gave it to you?
you didnt do the stealing... but youre very aware its stolen
let me phrase it even better actually
Car maker A designs a car, spends a lot of time on engineering and then releases the car. Some people buy the car but others wait for maker B to steal the car designs and make their own trashier version that is a mixture of multiple other makers cars. Maker A sees people using that car and loses interest in making their next generation of the car. Maker B then doesnt really have anything to make their own new version because all they can do is mix up stolen designs so their quality of 'work' also deteriorates... is it right of you to continue to use Maker Bs car and tell all your friends about it by sharing some photography youre taking of it?
is the question related to a screenshot in which stolen content is used or to the content that is stolen?
is the question related to a screenshot in which stolen content is used or to the content that is stolen?
Yes wasn't one of the options though ๐
im aware you are ignorant
"yes... but again, i don't really see the issue"
so you agree it is wrong
tldr
it matters because they are supporting stealing content and degrading the modding community
okay so the discussion is regarding the screenshot of stolen content and not the stolen content itself?
yeah
righto
but they also distribute the stolen content amongst eachother
even paying a decent amount of money for some stolen stuff lol
$100 isnt too much to pay for some stolen gear from another mod that is free
any links to that screenshot or the content?
but $5 patreon is us milking the userbase yes
r/armaphotography
theres been a huge influx of stolen stuff
@meager saffron so you support content theft then
Right, so sharing the screenshot isn't illegal, although by doing so you're technically saying you endorse people stealing content, which is frowned upon but not illegal
@wintry yoke it is illegal
Spreading a screenshot of the content is?
Steam allows DMCAs of stolen content
obviously that doesn't extend to screenshots of the stolen content... but they are doing what they can
endorsing it, yes
lol
youre not as smart as you think you are @meager saffron
let me relate this to something you do, what in really general terms do you do for a living
thats where we are different I dont think I am nice
I am fair
not nice
Excuse me, but the screenshot alone has nothing to do with anything. All the assets in the scene could be stolen, does that lower the artistic value? No.
I must admit though that for someone to produce said screenshots, they'd have to be involved in the content theft. However, if you're just sharing a screenshot you didn't take but just found looking cool, I'm not sure that's equal to stealing the content in it
@wintry yoke correct
But you see @meager saffron is a moderator on that page.... it does him no harm to have a rule that says something like we dont support content theft you cant place your images with stolen content here
in fact they had that rule
Why would the page that hosts the images care? Why would people looking the images care?
the only reason they removed it is because the main guy who owns the place went through what is effectively a highschool falling out with everyone and then to get back he decided he would support content theft
@celest sundial people looking at the images care because they want to play with those mods lol....
that whole aspect is really really simple....
And from what it looks like the screenshot in question credited the mod that was used.
lol
If the mod stole if from somewhere else, blame the mod author not the person that used the mod
'private mods"
@meager saffron I didnt as I didnt even know who you were until an hour ago
but I do support the ban as you support content theft
what ban?
@celest sundial yes but by using those mods in their screenshots they are supporting the theft of content lol.....
no need, a TL:DR will do
No they are not
@meager saffron yeah we dont really care
@celest sundial they are, that isnt really whats up for debate here lol
you can try to explain why it isnt but youll be wrong
more in line of saving time to write an essay... I am curious to the background
If he's just the moderator, he isn't the one that's guilty of stealing the content and shouldn't be punished for it
keep in mind most of these screenshot guys are making screenshots for other screenshot guys.... in the sense that they are just making them to show off to other screenshot enthusiasts lol... so yes... it is supporting content theft
@wintry yoke we ban for support of content theft and stealing
Now flagging the screenshot as "Uses stolen content" or whatever would show at least some solidarity to the original authors of the content
a good bottom line standard
you mean on the discord?
nah from our stupid little reddit page
its really not even worth visiting as its just some WIP images
Posts with the intention to promote a mod that uses stolen assets would be considered promotion. If I use a mod to make a screenshot beause it looks cool that is totally not related. And this will have to be assumed if the person making the screenshot and mod author are unrelated.
@meager saffron yes but you do support it, and you are going about the same 'define stealing' thing every single one of you does.....
so forgive me for not believing you are totally unaware of that issue lmao
@celest sundial so you support content theft
I think that as long as you use publicly a stolen mod thats supporting its use and creation
It is
wait, where did warden ban the subreddit mod team?
Not sure how this Reddit feud is related to this discord...
@wintry yoke just from our dumb reddit page
idk why he even cares
he probably didnt even know it existed
@meager saffron again, I didnt ban you, but if you support content theft then yes its fair game you get banned
@wintry yoke the USP one
yeah ik right lmao
who cares
what keeps the moderators from re-instating the anti-stolen content rule?
alright so I'll apologize for assuming you were and most likely are very aware of all this since its been discussed numerous times on your subreddit thing
either way you are still supporting content theft
@inland sphinx ^^
wait, really?
Its largely because TheSenDest got bored of having to wait a month for new content from the USP dev build that he had special access to
he thought it was insane that we werent pumping out content for his amazing screenshots and so he got upset
probably a good idea
but you know how I love a good roast
if we keep the conversation about wheter its right or wrong to use stolen content in screenshots then I don't see why not using this channel
but if its just about that sub then we can take it to Dms or whatever I guess
@meager saffron I will unban you since it isnt fair to lump all moderators of that discord into one thing
solution? Reinstate the anti-stolen content rule
and actually follow it
there is no such thing as private mods really
@meager saffron unfortunately though I will have to ban you again for supporting stolen content
privately usually means shared secretely rather than just make a mod and not pubilshing it
so really nothing changes
because if content thieves see the mods is being used they feel legitimated for what they do
there are never actually private
I also have private mods... But nothing illegal in there...
@meager saffron why not just make the rule "if the content is stolen, the screenshots are not allowed here. Be it public or private mods."?
And stolen content is stolen content... No matter if it's public or not...
@wintry yoke because then they cant use their own stolen content
Considering the author of a screenshot to be supporting content theft just because he used props in the scene that were make taken from some other place is ridiculous and not how the world works. You have some very odd views.
Artists often use things they did not create as proterty in their scene. The objects dont matter. That is not what the artist made. It was his idea for the scene and how he arranged lighting etc. And that is what he wanted to share.
The only case in which this would be considered against any rules would be, if the artist is either the auhtor or works with the author of a mod that uses stolen assets. Which I assume so far is not the case.
wow thats the most stupid take ive heard yet on that @meager saffron
people just like to conflate the two so that stolen stuff seems more legitimate
@celest sundial you can't really make analogies with the outer world when talking about screenshots
the closest thing would be painters using copyrighted paint
which is a thing that exists btw
@meager saffron what's the "official" reason that there is no (longer) "stolen content not allowed here" rule?
OK, so then there would be nothing against creating such a rule?
if you read the announcement its clearly because the admin itself didn't like said rule
in a convo he explicited he "didn't want to wait a month for stuff to be released"
it is a subreddit, with no relationship to BI
i would simply ban everyone that runs that reddit from all official platforms and be done with the drama
it isnโt, there are rules on all offices channels
why should it.
To remove the incentive for others to look up and use the stolen content. Also to officially denounce support for users and 'creators' of stolen content
which werenโt made up so that some nobody that runs some subreddit can post images of ripped stuff
morally, there would be, but with some people you simply cannot be bothered
@brave knot : Arkensor you can't really make analogies with the outer world when talking about screenshots
Actually, FYI, you can: you're not allowed to take photos of the Eiffel Tower at night because "The lights on the tower are an artistic work" (so they are copyrighted), for example
I think you're not allowed to sell them
@fiery egret :))) you can if you get permission
but you can take them
I just don't understand how this discord is related to any random Reddit page...
And why this discussion is even in here...
Of course! @zealous ore
we are also talking about screenshots with stolen IPs @dark tulip
you are not allowed to use them in articles or publish em / or use commercially
lmao @meager saffron why did you reban me from your reddit
I was already banned and you did it for the same reason
That's something else, although even there BI is clear about the rules; not allowed
is this now just a ban out of spite/revenge?
that is defenitely offtopic
@brave knot Contrary to what Warden_1 wants to believe, i am not defending content theft. As at least Pufu here will know i am far on the opposite side :)
I am defending the right of content creators to create art (does not matter if it is a screenshot or if he painted that scene on canvas) using any sorts of props.
It might be morally wrong to use props that you know have been stolen, but even if you do, your art is just as good. People might dislike the backgrounds of it, but only the art itself matters. If you show it to someone without any context and he thinks "oh this is nice" that should be alright and nobody is to blame.
I will assume the original author has not protected the appearance of the mod items, sooo in which case you can just use them. If the scene could have been created in the same way using the "original" assets it does not matter if he used stolen ones for when he actually took the photo
https://discordapp.com/channels/105462288051380224/547515791579545600/719597096424046665
Does banning @zenith moss mean that you do more than just the Stylesheet? @meager saffron
If you let the artist know "oh well you use and credit a mod that steals" i am sure the artis would instead point people to the original source
@celest sundial "If the scene could have been created in the same way using the "original" assets it does not matter if he used stolen ones for when he actually took the photo" dumb take
@celest sundial that is a very good way to propagate the ripped stuff
To be honest the key thing about all of this for me is the problem of "promoting ripped content." Thats it...
well @celest sundial I doubt Bf4 devs have ever been interested in making arma 3 screenshots or mods
so my idea shifts on the "its stolen"
@shell scaffold you don't understand that your not allowed use illegal/stolen content?
@celest sundial - more on the point, if the artistry doesnโt come from the ripped stuff, but from composition, lighting etc
why need to use that in the first place
If I steal a car and drive it on the road without breaking rules, does that make it legal? Or only when I also drive too fast?
It is...
like I said before
Car maker A designs a car, spends a lot of time on engineering and then releases the car. Some people buy the car but others wait for maker B to steal the car designs and make their own trashier version that is a mixture of multiple other makers cars. Maker A sees people using that car and loses interest in making their next generation of the car. Maker B then doesnt really have anything to make their own new version because all they can do is mix up stolen designs so their quality of 'work' also deteriorates... is it right of you to continue to use Maker Bs car and tell all your friends about it by sharing some photography youre taking of it?
It is wrong
What you are doing us supporting it
You are contributing to the eventual decline of Arma modding
@shell scaffold what?
This has been discussed many times with the same result:
It is NOT allowed to share illegal content, or content based on illegal content.
that's not related to the virtual arsenal @shell scaffold ๐
yeah don't really see the connection
the virual arsenal is just a glorified box
It is part of the scene WAHT you put in there and not only the objects itself. Here is a different view: If i put all models that were stolen by their sides on a white background and post it somewhere to promote my mod, that serves little to none artistic value. The main interest was to promote the models and achieve something with it, maybe clicks on the workshop item page or something. If I have a nice screenshot idea in mind but i miss assets to make this, i just get them. If i was to find a workshop mod that offers these without any obvious hints that the mod is made with stolen assets, why would i be to blame to use them for my cool screenshot idea?
It comes down to the intention of WHY did the person create the screenshot.
As long as you know its stolen you are at fault
so โprivate modsโ
Promote the mod, yeah that's lame.
Express their creativity for arts sake, that is totally fine and something everybody does
you're implying that screenshot are either for publicity(on purpose and not) or for art
not both
aka ripped mods shared between various ppl
can be used
very unlikely considering post history
and they all know these mods are stolen because they share them amongst eachother since they are often removed from steam... even going as far as paying for stolen stuff that is mixed with BF4 or MW or something to give them additional cool items to show off in screenshots
from today alone
he achieved the smart just now
If the artist used models that he knows which were stolen and links to the place where the stolen assets are to be downloaded then yes of course that is promotion of stolen assets
he doesnโt need to post anything
the artist shouldn't have content stolen in the first place
heโll get a couple of pms
@celest sundial all of these screenshotters put "private mods ;)" in their mod list..... they are clearly trying to flex on others that they have some exclusive cool stolen mods lol...
heโll share the โpirvate modsโ further
@celest sundial What about screenshots that contain BI's IP in them? That has always been an issue. Is there a disconnect from that to the content of individuals?
Posting ripped content often leads to further spreading of it. I'm sure you are aware of how that happens, you've seen it yourself. That is one of the reasons why it isn't allowed on the regular ARMA channels afaik.
nah @celest sundial just using them is promotion
because at the end of the day all these screenshot guys want is new stuff to put in their pictures and show off
can we please conclude this
if that is your screenshot using stolen MGS models then yes you are
its a discussion
we either give up or convice the other part
not like this channel has high traffic anyway
You started the debate right in the middle of something, so I might not have all the backgrounds. Point is, if i make screenshots with a cool mod i found on the workshop and it turns out those were stolen assets, blame the mod author not the person who made a screenshot. He had no idea about it.
you would wish MGS1 had such cool models @meager saffron Nyte
If you use mods in screenshots, then why not share which mods have been used?
If something is custom made and kept private, no problem, although be aware a moderator can ask for verification.
All other cases are questionable and up to mods to react to it.
If that means removing content due to known illegal stuff, so be it
@celest sundial sure, but if you take the same screen with mod that has been shared with you with - do not share this private mod further
lol....
@meager saffron they have livestream where they make the models themselves
I think you are a lot more familiar with screenshots than just doing HTML on reddit @meager saffron
@meager saffron Don't be a ..... You're giving dutch people a bad name dennis.
Fill that in yourself, there's this no profanity rule of any kind so im gonna try and stay out of trouble this time by not mentioning the possibilities. @meager saffron
@celest sundial the moment you stick - private mod in that list of mods you used
itโs obvious
was trying to understand what does the MGSR mod has to do with all of this @meager saffron
is that all you know? An eye for an eye? @meager saffron
yeah because its obvious you are pretending to be some naive kid and then thinking youre the smartest one here who can run mental circles around us... trust me you arent lmao
@celest sundial how do you unkowingly use stolen stuff
genuine question
@zealous ore that might very much be the case yes. This screenshot here was linked: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2117019834 and this did not list and private stuff but only credited what the artist most likely believed was a proper source of his assets
@wintry yoke I just saw you reaction, and you're so god damn right with that sentence ๐
you gotta be more specific than "your reaction"
@celest sundial that is fine
@meager saffron stop blaming warden and answer me this. Yes or No, do you endorse/support/condone use of ripped/stolen models in mods.
i mean the average joe
The doe niet zo lullig
doesnโt really know he is in the wrong
then the question is
how do you use stolen stuff if you're against their use
Then indeed that is a yes. if you do not care about the origin of the props used, then people can say you willing support content theft
@meager saffron so if you do not support stolen content then you have no problem stepping down from that reddit page
and saying why you stepped down
warden, just stop with the schoolground insults
@zenith moss we talked about this
insulting only brings lower the conversation quality
anyway @meager saffron if you say you support screenshots regardless of the used mods, you are technically saying you support the content theft. "Regardless of used mods" means "all mods" which are both the illegal and legal mods
Good, so now we can talk IP.topics instead of random Reddit stuff...
lmao yeah youll never convince them though so idc these days
Well at least we sorted out the cirteria for if someone is to blame or not. If X says "I don't care that i use stolen assets to make my screenshots, I will continue to do so" you are free to blame X for that. And we as community have a lot of reasons to say, we want to exclude people who "do not care" from our boards
still I don't get how you accidentally do that
!purgeban 289831354244399105 90d for IP rights violations and supporting content theft.
*PewPewPew!!*
RIP @frank pecan
wait what?
!purgeban 106666259680088064 30d for supporting/endorsing content theft
*PewPewPew!!*
RIP @meager saffron
Zero Tolerance
thanks
don't really see the point in banning malecat more than nytemyre
oh you're right @potent moss
Why'd my post get deleted?
Lets not promote stolen content, thanks
we are not?
I wasn't promoting it? Just giving an example.
And you called it out by name. Lets not promote stolen content
Ok...
It has been. It was linked in #ip_rights_violations and removed the same day if I remember correctly.
If there ever a good time to stop discussing this, now would be it.
Missed the discussion, anyone got a tl;dr?
Don't violate the rules.
I don't really understand why we can't discuss ip topics in the #other_ip_topics channel
but sure I guess since every other part of the conversation got banned
Stealing IP = Bad
Thats the TLDR
Fair enough
you didn't? because it looked exactly like you did just that
from what I remember he just asked why it was wrong and then understood
he did say some stupid stuff but giving him 3 times the bandays of the guy who actually supported stealing is weird
people fail to understand that there is a zero tolerance policy around here for IP theft, ripping, stealing, etc
yeah I can understand the ban
but why 3 times as NyteMyre?
it;s gonna be more ban now, since this is a second account
in any case, take it in private
:))) obviously
wow that was enjoyable
discussing IP issues is fine, but supporting certain behaviors is not supporting anymore
seems like you very much did so
but whatever
I still haven't got an answer tho
about what?
why the 90 days instead of 30 for nyte
doubt sarcarsm is gonna help
its not really good to joke about this stuff
issue with text, is that sarcas cannot really be understood the same way
then you wonder why you get banned
not really
its not even a good joke
if youre going to risk a ban at least make it funny
just my two cents
yeah, i did say that
shame that banned people get their messages deleted
I don't remember his part of the conversation
do not advertise/promote stolen contentโฆ a.k.a support them
to anyone wondering
yeah we had an extensive discussion about it
@shell scaffold I would read the #rules and Discord ToS regarding multiple accounts and discussing moderator decisions...
is sysop still with BI
never heard of him?
oh lol
โ ๏ธ
Twitch just started war vs own streamers because of music https://www.twitch.tv/p/legal/community-guidelines/music/
e.g. https://twitter.com/fuslie/status/1269553773506002945 hunt streamers even 3-4 years back via theirs VOD archives !
accounts can be permanently banned, remember some game music "licensed only for limited time to the game itself" !
(failure to utilize FAIR royalty split between the service/streamer vs the IP owner via automated means based on usage)
fact: Twitch (Amazon) was making billions in past 10 years on streamers which had music/songs in background
thus partly guilty by default (i think it's very similar problem in relation to game-mods, other content w/o IP approval)
thats going to ruffle some feathers
we need neural network powered filters to remove background music completely ๐
so basically streamers got to turn off music and play something that they can be sure is free on the background?
to be safe from now on?
Well, all we know from that is that Twitch went after some people... we don't really know what those people did. Afaik both Twitch and YouTube provide music libraries for use in streams of stuff that will not get you into trouble - coincidently was watching someone stream DayZ today who put on Twitch music while relieving himself, came back and replayed the last song saying "I didn't know that song was on the Twitch list... Love that song"...
And we are all strong supporters of people's IP rights, so... ๐คท
imagine being small streamer who does it for fun, how the hell he know that in game he played 4 years ago,
was licensed music for limited time, hell even twitch own suggested playlist (paid/free of royalties) had songs inserted
and removed based on expiration or when the owner withdrawn from the deal w/e
now that streamer recently became partner, pays for music and plays royalty free music only, gets banned for that 4 years old vod in archive
don't get me on remasters of old popular music, which is causing perfectly legal royalty free music being flagged (typical example youtube)
that's the thing @abstract crest even theirs own list isn't persistent guarantee it is or it was royalty free (relation to archive hunt)
Oh. That's different, and not good
while not perfect analogy, imagine you end on video of doing something 4 years ago and from today there is new law making it illegal and you get charged for it tomorrow ๐คฃ
the banning is pretty poor move yeah. removing the content should be enough
oh it seems not only VODs getting DMCAed, also clips too
!purgeban 714557342221467660 365d ban evasion
*PewPewPew!!*
RIP @winter tundra
@inland sphinx it's problem of Twitch doing nothing to address it, just going with the simplest solution of banning the content creators
remember, it's Twitch who monetize it all (the streams, the vods, the clips) even from those who get nothing monetary from Twitch (not partners)
while other services like Youtube, Vimeo, Spotify had signed deals with Record Labels, Music and A&V companies for royalties payments based on usage
it's quite complicated as the streaming and similar services offer nothing for the content creators to resolve royalty issues (e.g. automatic payments based on detect/listed a&v material)
same goes about recording, multichannel support (one for voice, one for game sound, another for ingame music, another for nongame music)
wish someone made new platform capable of all this ... and wipe the floor with the existing one
and yes ironically, it's very similar problem the modders and other IP owners are facing ...
you can easily get flagged for stuff which isn't supposed to be licensed but someone did remaster of music from 30 in 80s and guess what, video is flagged and you get DMCA
at this point, i guess it would be be easier to just develop neural network filter which would remove any background music ๐คฃ
you can even get flagged for 200+ years old music from Strauss playing from 70 years old vinyl
@shell scaffold#8934
what exactly is the reason for the "No Private Mods" and "No ripped content" rule on the BI forum
No ripped content is pretty clear. Ripping destroys the Arma modding scene, and we already had too many seasoned modders leave over such stuff. I mean.. on top of it being plain out friggin ILLEGAL dude.
The "no private mods" rule came about because people started posting.. well.. "private" mods, that were only private because they contained ripped/illegal content, and publishing these mods would get the "authors" into legal trouble.
Also while its private, noone can really check if there is ripped content in there, if you just have screenshots that look similar-ish to other stuff.
also why we have the rule that every screenshot needs to list the mods used.
Thus, the rippers salted the soup for everyone else in that all non-publicly released mods aren't allowed to be posted, because noone could check or report illegal content in such mods. I'm sure you witnessed the Echolon International issue with their "private" mods?
@zealous ore
private mods = ripped s**t
not true, I have private mods too, private for the sole reason that they have stuff thats probably not relevant for anyone outside my unit, thus never publicly released, doesn't make it automatically be ripped or illegal in any way though.
Private mods were never an issue, until all the rippers used it as a label to hide their illegal stuff behind the "muh its private" curtain.
@celest sundial
Considering the author of a screenshot to be supporting content theft just because he used props in the scene that were make taken from some other place is ridiculous
Thats not how that happens though, these people rip stuff themselves, or get people to rip it for them just to make and share their screenshots. The content is stolen specifically for use in screenshots, thus the screenshots are directly used to promote that behaviour.
If you let the artist know "oh well you use and credit a mod that steals" i am sure the artis would instead point people to the original source
That's not happening, because the artists just list the mods as "private" and they are their own mods, so they cannot point somewhere else.
Point is, if i make screenshots with a cool mod i found on the workshop and it turns out those were stolen assets, blame the mod author not the person who made a screenshot. He had no idea about it.
Correct, very rarely happens though, and thats not really the issue.
The issue is the people literally promoting stealing content, by doing it on their own to promote it specifically in their screenshots.
No objections to that. I was not aware that people ripping stuff for private mods was such a big deal, and that - as it seems - many artists use private mod colletions with bad intentions.
I would have hoped that the majority does it for the arts sake, not even repacking any mods or making something private etc etc. Just sharing a screenshot without anything attached to that what so ever.
@brave knot
he did say some stupid stuff but giving him 3 times the bandays of the guy who actually supported stealing is weird
It was actually his second ban for the same thing. And the ban evasion on top means I will now turn his temp ban into a permanent.
I would not consider someone an "artist" when their primary intent is to promote a private mod collection. I did mention that though ๐
so basically streamers got to turn off music and play something that they can be sure is free on the background?
to be safe from now on?
What people seem to not notice here, its not twitch DMCA'ing people over music.
its music labels filing DMCA claims, and twitch behing forced to process them accordingly. Also twitch had rules in place since ever along the lines of "if you get too many DMCA claims you get banned" literally nothing changed besides that one music label now issuing DMCA's for their stuff.
But people are attacking and blaming twitch for it now, while its not their fault at all.
it's problem of Twitch doing nothing to address it, just going with the simplest solution of banning the content creators
remember
Twitch is just following their own long ago set-out rules. But as far as I can read on twitter, not even that. They are already not banning people even with 4 DMCA strikes, even though they said they'd ban after 3.
I support a 3 strike == ban rule, I would love if we could have such a rule on the Arma workshop, it has been discussed lots of times already. Really not much different.
I was not aware that people ripping stuff for private mods was such a big deal, and that - as it seems - many artists use private mod colletions with bad intentions.
There was that one guy, who was once on USP's media team, essentially a collegue of monarch (r/armaphot.. owner)
They repeatedly posted ripped stuff, moving USP into a VERY bad light, even demanding to get USP content before release so that they could be the first to screenshot it.
There were issues with people taking/ripping USP-pre-release stuff (not sure if related to these screenshot people too, but I very much assume so) which is why USP went for encryption which got them temporarily banned from BIF for a while.
One of these two screenshot guys for USP, got banned from BIF 6! times, posting ripped content, abusive language, ban evasion (duh), attacking USP team, pretending to be someone else. A pure s***show just over the ability to post screenshot and show off cool looking ripped stuff and trying to make himself a name with that.
@zenith moss as multiple people told you now, there is REALLY no need to lower yourself down to kindergarden level insults, you explained to him well enough, he's in the wrong. No need to attack people that way trying to make a point that was already made and that everyone already has in their mind.
You already have too many warnings, this is your last one.
You made 99% of this conversation without violating #rules, I'm sure its not a problem for you to think about the last 1%...
!issuewarning @zenith moss Note: last warning before ban, text given in chat.
Done.
@inland sphinx you very well know what i mean by private mods. i have private mods myself, made by myself, that i have no intention of publishing, but thatโs different
Yes.
But you posted "private mods = ripped content" which isn't true, and not everyone reading here will know what you mean
i think i said that in most situations (for the purpose of the discussion - โphotographyโ) that stands true :))
if you use content from others you should be able to credit them (with link to mod), if its your own unpublished content you can say so ("Custom models/textures/etc.")... no need for "private mod" in any case, so IMHO a red flag
@inland sphinx I thought my entire conversation followed the rules lol.....
Besides two comments (now deleted) it did
low IQ and simp
what about me?
figured that was fair game since it was vulgar
- Zero tolerance policy regarding offensive behaviour,
this includes harassment, name calling, racism, sexism, homophobia, other derogatory remarks (profanity) or any insults.
okay but for me, you gotta admit that whole conversation was much cleaner than normal
it's not clean if it ends in a ban of a participating party
@lean plover didnt this time though https://i.imgur.com/IlCgX2y.png
that was just a generalization
Btw since I just got around to reading this chat
I support a 3 strike == ban rule, I would love if we could have such a rule on the Arma workshop, it has been discussed lots of times already. Really not much different.
I would support the 3 strike rule in general, but imo its unfair in this situation since people are suddenly getting strikes for stuff that was previously assumed to be fine without having time to adjust their behaviour after a strike
you gotta admit that whole conversation was much cleaner than normal
yep
it's not clean if it ends in a ban of a participating party
well not his fault ๐
for stuff that was previously assumed to be fine without having time to adjust their behaviour after a strike
Assumed is one thing, but copyright is pretty clear i think, and twitch's rules probably too. Just ignoring them and assuming its fine doesn't make it so
But clearly a huge problem if twitch approved partners are doing it all the time without any punishments
if steam saved information used to make purchases and what not and then supplied that info for DMCA counters or fraudulent DMCAs etc... that would be ideal
though iirc right now they are not forcing you to sign in to make a DMCA
which could be a requirement of DMCAs
well Youtube evolved since the years ago dramas, now strikes expire after like 90 days, there are claims which aren't strikes and can be addressed before turning into strike
youtuber can also counter the strike and claim to negate it if it's invalid
ain't perfect but it's way better than instant 24 hours suspension on Twitch and 3 strikes autoban with no expiry or counter combat
if someone really wanted he could cripple Twitch by crawler and trolling fake claims ...
@thorny orbit enhanced movement? bad benson, quite sure he doesn't give monetization permissions to life servers
yeah I found the post sadly
or dont monetize?
hey man hes gotta make that money off content he didn't create
I gotta admit, the no swearing thing is really hard to stick with especially as an Aussie haha.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2116880715
I've been watching this mod for a few days now, trying to figure out if it's against copywrite. As far as I can tell, it is completely independent from FATA, implying the uploader has taken the models from FATA. What do you reckon?
well he did not make them
the first few lines state he is not the author which makes this a reupload. And how it is worded in the classic all credit way its likely un authorized
which one should I have ticked when searching for images I can use as textures in arma?
second from bottom I'd say
๐
although if you intend to upload to steam, second from top
not really, but I'll bear that in mind
Oops, my bad
eXcEpT
Allow me to get comfortable with some popcorn
Crazy how much a little ineffective list can get up under some peoples skin
@zenith moss Well, I won't just sit here and try to explain myself because I know how you respond to thoughts, you'll just try to hit me with irrelevant things instead of arguing about the matter, I experienced it before
So goodnight everyone, it was a lovely chat we had
Waste of time, figured
Present facts and I'm sure you'll get a factual response
Well I just made popcorn for nothing, thats some facts ๐
What does that have to do with ip rights? @white pollen
@dark tulip we are actively working on something like that
Like I said
This blacklist is the first step
Of course, and I'm a big supporter of that.
Although, just like Joe, I can see the abuse with it, which can be damaging to the mod(s) implementing it, the community and the game.
But when it's used on a "per mod" or "per mod team" basis it's all in the hands of the devs, and not a community run list (which most likely will still happen in the long run)
decent people usually have nothing to worry about in things like this
At that point you just have to hope they have some kind of moral fiber
๐ค
the people using such systems?
well if they dont have, then why would you even want to be part of their users
I was referring to the potential abuse of that kind of system. I like the idea of it myself itโs a step forwards as much as some people might disagree with it
@small hamlet actually here
decent people usually have nothing to worry about in things like this
Not entirely true, if the list is "open" or moderated by biased people (which even this community has), than it can and will be abused pretty fast.
But yeah, dropping in my two cents from another games handling of it.
I dont see such list becoming open like that
[02:43] Joe: But yeah, the way TWs games handled it, they went off the purchase key for the game as opposed to Steam ID. So once that key was circulated to enough servers, you basically couldn't play NW anymore. Which was a problem when there was all of like, four or five major server providers at the time.
[02:44] Joe: It was a reasonably great idea to start with, but it spiralled into something much more malicious in the long run. It was definitely caused by there being a complete lack of real input by TW / FSE into that side of things.
[02:44] Joe: TW seems to be taking steps to implement something themselves with Bannerlord, though, so we'll see.
whats TW?
I've thought i've been a somewhat decent person but have been added to a blacklist before just because I happened to be working in the same group with a person that triggered the person with blacklist add powers lol
๐
like, and no offense to Dedmen, but if posting the same question on 2 different (unrelated) Discord servers is a reason for a ban, than I can see something similar happen with this list just because 1 person is able to.
If youโre talking about that one dude it seems he did it many times after being warned each time
yeah the moderation rulings are not quite that simple here either
they just are not public
but yes it is possible someone would indeed missuse the power
I think, in some regards, it's almost guaranteed to be an eventual outcome - but again, it's strictly dependent on who is managing such a list, whether or not they are guaranteed to be impartial and not respond in anger, ensuring there's structured processes for clarifying evidence and so forth.
It's an enormous amount to take on.
Were you commenting to me? @zenith moss
But again; I'm 100% for a solution to make it harder for people to rip content from others, and if a blacklist is helping (in any form) than it's a good start.
However I do think that "we" have to come up with a better solution in the form of prevention instead of damage control.
No
@small hamlet if other option is that mod makers give up and stop making mods
because that happens every now and then
I agree with Grez, admittedly a blacklist just worries me at the core - at least, one controlled by the player-base. It's definitely something I'd rather see BI stand up and take charge of, but that's a financial cost for them. The only other alternative I could see is something similar to EVE's community ambassadors; purely voluntary, and under strict guidance / set expectations.
And yeah, I have noticed Goat. I was devastated when I saw Delta Hawk was stopping.
Which isnโt what anyone wants really. I like mods, I like using mods, and Iโd like to learn how to make my own @vast stump
I mean shoot Iโve known several guys who quit because of the community
I even stepped back once
legitimate mistake dedmen
I've only really started working on my own models myself recently, and it's a slog, but I've had people rip logos I've made before or make derivatives without asking / citing the original. I can appreciate how demeaning it can be.
forgive me for that one sin
Yeah Iโve had people rip and sell my stuff
Several times now
Itโs frustrating
@small hamlet in short that's what the current moderators are for; if someone is doing something bad, they are required to look at the proof and take actions when needed. If that means a discord/forum ban, so be it. If it means a full BE ban, it can be done. If that means an entry to a blacklist, I'm sure they'll be able to handle that.
And thatโs the issue. Itโs so damaging
I handled marketing for my last job, on top of managing our company website (with all the branding, unique artwork and so forth) - I wound up going on a bit of a crusade against people that'd stolen art from our product pages and re-hosted it elsewhere claiming it was theirs. It's not a nice experience.
That's fair, Grez.
But I fully understand where you come from and I feel the same when badly implemented
I think, what I'm proposing (in theory), is something similar that just tackles... purely the Workshop / Modding content, I guess? They become the go-to point for that sort of thing exclusively. It means people have a figure (or figures) that they know will be there, have a keen understanding of BIs policies and potentially have the additional tools needed to crack a key'd PBO in those rare cases where they need to see the files inside to make sure they are/aren't ripped, I guess.
idk, like I said, I'm incredibly distrusting of people in general. It's not a great position to be in, and it does colour my views on this sort of subject rather strongly in one direction.
Then youโll understand if we arenโt very trusting of others and prefer to handle our list for our mod ourselves.
Aye, I can appreciate that. I do hope in the long run it doesn't backfire - the last thing we need is BI stepping in with a solution that ultimately causes more harm than good, although I doubt they'd do so.
I'm sure that more teams will implement something similar (if not the same) in time, simply to make life more relaxed without the worry of sending DMCA's every day (which can be a fulltime job for some projects).
And if this system remains private I'm all for it, so there's a lower change of it being abused or worse, being cracked.
BI doesnโt care about us unless it impacts their cash flow
Likewise. Fingers crossed for the future, regardless.
Obviously, we need to conscript Dedmen to take this up - he's in need of more work, right? That five minute toilet break is totally not needed.
My man mentioned fixing Thermals the other day. I expect great things from him. ๐
Did he really?
Soonโข๏ธ
Yep he did mention it
I wanted to improve A3 thermal. Its on the "nice to have" list, maybe it can still happen
@inland sphinx
Ah I did not mean to tag then.
But dont get your expectations up peeps, he props has a lot on that list
also this is getting quite off-topic
True, true - worth hopping over a channel now.
did someone say fixing thermals
imo if a mod's author(s) implement a streamid rejectlist within their own mod they are perfectly entitled to do so, they are pro-actively protecting their IP.
@turbid meadow our blacklist with reasons for bans will never be public because some instances would give away the method we use to locate some of the offenders on the list
Fair
btw my favourite comment from the thread about USP's ban list is
This is what happens when you give modders rights and have an ip rights violations channel. Blame BI for this cringe

Because why should modders own the stuff they make
"oh, you got arrested for murder... well, blame the gov for having laws and blame the police for arresting you"
Sounds about right
@lean plover this is what happens when you let modders have free will, I demand you make me a car for my life server right now
"whishes can be placed after providing a donation receipt of $350,- to the ICRC"
yeah the moderation rulings are not quite that simple here either
@vast stump
Explain
No swearing
As an Irish Australian no swearing rules are an affront to my people ๐
I'm a sailor, so what.
We have rules, just like I do at my place of employment, on the roads, in society... (no meme references plz)
@old jay I meant they are not made simply because you guys feel like it. There's the rules that are to be enforced and you guys have procedure on how to handle things.
And there's warnings and such prior harder actions
finally the case ends ๐
Oh hey, that's actually... not a bad win.
Within America, at least. It's a different situation in the rest of the world.
If youโre talking about that one dude it seems he did it many times after being warned each time
@zenith moss
No, TFAR discord #rules says crossposting (also inter server crossposting) is instant ban, that's what Grez meant
But I don't put people on a blacklist just because they are stupid
the last thing we need is BI stepping in with a solution that ultimately causes more harm than good, although I doubt they'd do so.
I think we can judge what would do more harm, and just not do it.
BI doesnโt care about us unless it impacts their cash flow
Not correct
I don't understand why I'm mentioned so often ๐
Because you're very loud in these cases ๐ And now even part of the BI gang ๐
No swearing
@gleaming cedar
that is actually one of the simplest moderator rulings examples. #rules clearly says not allowed, thus not allowed. There is no room for discussion.
There are some harder decisions of course, but thats not one of them
It's just a rule I find hard to get down with, I've never worked anywhere it's an issue before. I just find it an odd rule for a game with a mature rating, and I can't think of many/any other servers I'm in with a similar rule so it just takes some adjustment is all. I only mentioned it as a joke, but I find it funny because I do actually have to make a conscious effort when I post here.
I know it's not up for discussion at all, just kidding around since most people I know treat the lack of swearing here as a joke haha
I also changed over to not posting profanities, and I know of a handful of people that did too and don't have problems adjusting to it
I do actually have to make a conscious effort when I post here
I'd say this should give you food for thought, here ;P
Like I said, I just made a joke about it and just about everyone else I've joked with among many other communities have agreed it's a funny rule to have, like it's a kindergarten or something. I don't mind, I'm not refuting it and it's not an issue at all. It just makes me giggle that adults have to abide by a "No profanities" rule.
Regardless, very very off topic now so I apologise for that, I'm willing to leave that there.
@gleaming cedar As an adult, it makes me giggle that other adults can't understand why an official Discord would implement rules which are meant to curtail offensive behaviour which may be considered abusive in a public setting and thus portraying them (Bohemia Interactive) in a bad light.
Apple may not restrict you from visiting your favourite NSFW website on your iPhone, but they WILL restrict you from posting it publicly on their Official forum or similar type platform. "As an adult", you should understand this. If you do not, this may not be the Discord server for you.
I have no issues with the rule, as I said. I fully understand why the rule exists. I simply live on the other side of the globe and have different cultural perspectives. It is funny, and I can live with it.
Same in the US lol. In business, industry and social settings.
Really hard when some expressions use those words as well lol
Considering that you (and your team) have been advised of the rules (multiple times) I do not understand what is so difficult to understand.
When you use it so regularly without event thinking about it as vulgar you have a harder time catching it... ergo the slip ups and such lol
10 years in the US military, 1 of them in Fallujah, another 10 years on the street as a SWAT Medic (NREMT-P) and I've learned to know when and where is appropriate to use my "expanded" vocabulary. There's no excuse.
Alright
It's not about excuses, or rationales or any of that. It's literally just being able to laugh at a funny situation. It's funny, have a laugh, move on. Nothing is "so difficult to understand", it's just about being light-hearted and knowing when you can laugh at something... I made a widely recognised joke at my own expense. I think it's easy enough to tell none of us are trying to "overthrow the no swearing rule" or that we don't understand it or something, it's not a big deal. I've been trying to keep it light hearted the whole time and I've just been stonewalled by people citing the rules and stating how "Swearing is not acceptable" yada yada. I know, if I disagreed about not being able to swear I wouldn't be complying like I am. Lighten up a bit, there's enough doom and gloom around as it is, I don't know why this couldn't just be a throw away joke like it was supposed to be.
I don't know why this couldn't just be a throw away joke like it was supposed to be.
Because the last time someone did something similar quite a few number of users got banned. It turned into a "they can't ban all of us" action.
Spoiler, they were all banned.
If you don't like the rules, leave. If you're going to stir the pot, leave. If you're going to continue a subject despite needing to be constantly reminded that we have rules and guidelines here, you may want to leave.
Alright, no jokes only super serious arma talk here then...
Sorry I ever said anything, jeez.
More of a "read the room dude". Jokes on a topic people take very seriously when it comes to its violation should be thought about twice.
And so the "gnat is my dead brother and I have his permission to reupload his content" story goes on..
LOL... They are deleting his comments ๐คฆ
is he doing the DMCA now?
And ๐คฃ Looking at recent comment from the ripper: The mod you are thinking about is something similar but it's a little different. The FSF-1 is the current listing that we have for Arma 3. The Arma 2 one you were talking about is not a sea fighter ship, it is a type of landing craft. They have some similarities but overall are different, Thank you.
Mod has been DCMAed so looks like it
link?
Ripped FSF-1 Mod Link: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2117129905
is gangway an actual word?
LCS is still not DCMAed yet
But the comments on the FSF are quite honestly delusional ๐คท
really? To me they are disabled or all deleted
oh weird that they're not on the same page
Yeah I reached Gnat via email
Surprised that Very Presidential hasn't had the ban hammer on the forum given he joined to say "False misleading information"
Is he on the forum?
Sorry I already got the green light for ban, just picking up leftovers from last week
Looks like they took it (and the LCS mod) down or make it private on the Workshop. Great job by all who got involved in this one! ๐
https://steamcommunity.com/id/numby61/myworkshopfiles/
๐ค
@CIP israel 2GB modpack
JackFrench Mod 1,3GB modpack
ALS Mod 800MB altis life modpack. @wintry yoke already notified authors over a year ago apparently.
ARMA 3 LS MOD PACK 2,4GB modpack
@ISRLIFE 3,5GB modpack
isis Full Mod 2,3GB modpack
also got told he has even more stuff that's set to private
What is the problem with private stuff?
the moment you re-upload somethin to steam, even if the thing is set to private
you break steam TOS, unless you made that stuff
also, being private to 2+ people doesn't make it personal use anymore
At the end of the day if you don't respect the reasonable wishes of a modder then you really have no business using their mod ๐คท
To me at least, private Workshop stuff is totally okay and I cannot really See the difference to other repositories but the steam TOS nobody really reads anyways
@proud helm nothing is wrong with private stuff as long as itโs legit, nothing is wrong with setting a steam item to prove as long as itโs legit
But these are people stealing others mods and uploading to steam as private so itโs harder to find
Yeah but not reading it doesnโt excuse you from it
Hey everyone! I don't know if this is the right place for this and this has probably been asked before but I wanted to ask if anybody knows how EA handles use of their assets and IP in mods. Crysis assets more specifically. I want to make a mod that would include copyrighted material from Crysis and I'm not sure if doing so will cause any legal trouble. I know Microsoft allows the use of the Halo IP in mods if you add a certain phrase and a link to their content usage rules. I have done some googling and found no 100% clear answer so I thought I would ask here. Is there anything like that for EA content?
EA don't own the Crysis IP; they operated as the publisher on the first three games. Crytek hold the IP.
Your best bet is to check Crytek's website for any relevant information, or shoot them an email. However, there is at least one other Crysis mod on the workshop that I know of, but I wouldn't take that as a "it's fine, dude" situation.
Ripping content from any IP is forbidden in all cases (which is also the case for content by Microsoft). This includes (but does NOT limit to) models, textures, etc.
Making content based on existing IP's is something that some companies (like MS) allow within limits, while others don't (like Disney).
As for EA (or Crytek for that matter); I couldn't find any specific rules about using their content or IP's, so in short "it's not allowed unless permission has been given to you personally".
Thanks! I will stay on the safe side and try to contact Crytek about it.
And remember, no response does not mean its ok or isn't prohibited.
Crytek do not like their IP moving off of their engines. As other have said, you may not rip any asset from an existing game without consent from Crytek. You may get away with creating 100% new content using IP/designs based off Crysis. But as its not on one of their game engines and it would potentially take players away from their own titles I seriously doubt they would allow it. But its always worth asking...
Crytek offered Crysis content for mod makers under certain license on theirs store website and Humble Bundle (i've got some myself)
for those assets, examine the licenses attached
for rest of assets , contact Crytek
2016 https://www.cryengine.com/news/view/only-six-more-days-to-buy-cryengine-humble-bundle , https://www.gamefromscratch.com/post/2016/03/15/Inside-The-CryEngine-Humble-Bundle.aspx
2018 https://www.cryengine.com/news/view/our-humble-cryengine-bundle-2018-is-go-grab-a-deal
And when you read the licences attached to the packages what does it say? From what i remember when i looked at something similar a year or two ago its something like "For use on Cryengine only"
https://www.cryengine.com/ce-terms
2.4. Restrictions on Use: Crytek reserves all rights not expressively granted in this Agreement. Without limitation, Licensee shall not:
...
...
copy, replicate or mimic Crytekโs games;
...
...
If you do that you should propably also leave a comment so they know why you're disliking the video @zenith moss
I joined in on the quality comments and left a hard earned dislike, thanks for sharing warden
!purgeban @zenith moss 60d repeated rule violations despite multiple warnings, no improvements visible
*fires them railguns at @zenith moss* ร_ร
warden_1#2831 now has 7 infractions.
@golden topaz link, description :u
why do you have to disable embeds :c
Anyhow, it is in regards to the video that was removed from here a few hours ago
yikes
An apology about discussing ripping content and such on the Arma Artist Podcast
Can I link the video?
or is it just going to stay gone
if they were serious about it, they'd take down the video.
it was deleted for a reason @golden topaz
aight
We made a mistake, we publicly apologised it and are taking active steps to make sure nothing bad happens from our side to upset the community again. Reason we haven't taken down the video is to show that we can handle criticism and don't just hide ourselves away from criticism
You still explain in that video how to rip content from addons,. regardless if you regret your actions, your inaction in not removing that video is telling about your respect for other community members.
could just edit that part out and re upload
Hopefully you guys also stop actually doing it too.
@pseudo mango So I found this very much illegal looking reupload of some VSM pbo's on your workshop https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1943222725
I'd recommend you take that down now
could just edit that part out and re upload
We could do that. But then again, I think that "hiding" our mistakes is not a good idea
Ok that I did forget about, I made it back when and I do apologise. I got my excuses but it doesn't matter it's unexcusable.
Thanks
Believe me when I say I never wanted to upset any member of the community, my 2 co-hosts and I planned this podcast to be something to bring people together
We want nothing but the best for the whole arma community
if we mess up point it out to us*
We shouldn't have to.
Don't steal/modify/reupload someone else's content (even it it too happens to be stolen)
And don't tell others how to do the same thing
"yeah point it out to us, be we won't do anything about it" ๐คทโโ๏ธ
@old jay We are human, we made a selfish judgement to talk about it and are going to not be mentioning anything. Just to clarify we didn't steal it we talked about stolen content in general in a way where we were encouraging people
According to Discords own rules, it falls under dissemination of cheats/hacks.
We wouldn't want to upset people in this community, the mod I uploaded before someone sent me the PBOs and asked me to add patches on to it. That is all on me, I made a dumb and selfish choice of taking someone else's work and modifying it
For many years this community has been known as the premium addon/mod creating community, people work tirelessly and in great detail to create fantastic addons/mods/missions/campaigns to release for free so that everyone benefits, including Bohemia Interactive. There are a few simple rules in place to provide the respect to these creative people/groups that they deserve:
The first and most fundamental rule is that you must seek permission to alter someone's work, to mirror it or use it in any way other than for personal use. No permission, no editing, no mirroring, no adding to your mod pack, no editing and sharing around your private squad, none of that is acceptable.
On these forums you must follow this rule, if a person/team post a thread to share an addon/mod using content from someone else without permission and we receive a complaint then the mod thread will be closed until the issue is resolved and the forum member(s) risks being permanently banned from these forums for taking someone's work without permission.
This isn't just limited to re-using content in addons/mods/missions however, it's not acceptable to edit someone's work without permission and then to post screenshots of it on the forums (even if the edited addon/mod is purely for personal use), it's also not acceptable to edit someone's work, or use someone's work in any way that you don't have permission for and then to create videos which you post on these forums, doing any of the above without the permission of the original creators risks a permanent ban, for individuals, for whole mod teams or squads.```
As a sidenote I'd just like to mention that I like the idea of making a podcast about modding related stuff
@pseudo mango
Thanks @turbid meadow ๐
Well we probably won't be talking that much about mods from now on ๐
Well we will but we won't be discussing how to modify them.. :/
You can always look into ways to modify stuff within those mods and the games/steams licenses (as in stuff like making reskins without reuploading the mods own files)
That'd be something I'm quite interested in
I'm gonna just stray away from those related topics, because 1 slip up in a sentence and it's the end for us.
Oh yeah. That won't ever happen again. We'll make sure of that
Eh I think you guys would be fine as long as you double check that you're staying within the licenes boundaries
If you really wanted to fix this, you would take down your video & remove the section this discussion is about.
Keeping it up for 'clicks' is only spreading how you have ripped content from addons and that you support doing that, A bit-part apology on twitter does not show one iota of remorse.
Think about it like this:
You make screenshots of Arma, you may edit them in post or whatever, putting in extra work.
Now I see your 'hard work' and claim it as my own and post it all over my twitter, reddit, etc.
That is me stealing your IP.
Now think about it like this:
A mod author who in many cases puts hundred's/thousand's of hours into creating and releasing their content to the community for free,
You come along and rip out parts of those mods that you want,
In doing so YOU break the licence's under which those mods are released,
You show it in your screenshots etc,
You then release a video on YouTube in which you explain how you tore those mods apart.
Other people hear that and do the same and the cycle repeats with them.
Can you see how bad you look now?
Can you see how deflating and discouraging that is to people who create the actual content you use in your screenshots?
But yeah I like the general idea of the podcast and its nice to see more media about arma being produced 
Also yeah I agree that it would be best to reupload the video without the problem parts
Yeah it would be, but will you?
Video has been privated.
If you really wanted to fix this, you would take down your video & remove the section this discussion is about.
Keeping it up for 'clicks' is only spreading how you have ripped content from addons and that you support doing that, A bit-part apology on twitter does not show one iota of of remorse.Think about it like this:
You make screenshots of Arma, you may edit them in post or whatever, putting in extra work.
Now I see your 'hard work' and claim it as my own and post it all over my twitter, reddit, etc.
That is me stealing your IP.Now think about it like this:
A mod author who in many cases puts hundred's/thousand's of hours into creating and releasing their content to the community for free,
You come along and rip out parts of those mods that you want,
In doing so YOU break the licence's under which those mods are released,
You show it in your screenshots etc,
You then release a video on YouTube in which you explain how you tore those mods apart.
Other people hear that and do the same and the cycle repeats with them.Can you see how bad you look now?
Can you see how deflating and discouraging that is to people who create the actual content you use in your screenshots?
That's a really good point actually ๐ค It totally makes sense from your view.
Video has been privated.
Good on you peeps for doing it
Yeah no @elfin coral we messed up, I get it from your side completely.
Language ๐
I cant remember if censoring it with the stars is accepted, I recommend removing it entirely to be on the safe side
Like I said, video is privated and will be edited to exclude that part, we in no way, shape or form want harm for the community, I've been playing BI games for a better part of half a decade. I love this game and will continue to do so. I, roughly 7 months ago made the bad decision to take some PBOs i was sent and modify them. I wasn't too big in to arma so I never knew how much work is actually put in. It was a selfish decision on my part and it's inexcusable, and i understand why you lot are upset with me about that.
Regarding the whole saying things that not needed to be said on stream is our fault. And I can't apologise enough. I accept the hate we got on it because we were in the wrong, there's no way for us to explain it in a way where we are in the wrong.
!issuewarning @pseudo mango profanity
Failed to PM @pseudo mango
3 times is a few too many
damn sorry it's just engraved in me to use these type of words my bad
I'm fine with one or two accidents, but after being told twice about it...
But ye good on you peeps for agreeing that you made a mistake and are working on bettering it now @pseudo mango
Warning won't mean anything unless you continue violating #rules which you probably won't, so no worries
^ i have a few warnings too 
Yeah I really won't man im sorry, just Irish people can't help exchanging a few normal words for profanity words.
But yeah we goofed up and it's our fault. We really can't excuse it.
We will try better ourselves, I understand why the hate is there and it's justified, just know we're taking a stance as a team to fix ourselves and make sure that sort of thing doesn't happen again.
But ye good on you peeps as I said, in my time here I've seen the exact opposite of your reaction far too often so its good to see peeps agreeing that they made a mistake
No problem as long as you live up to it and take care of it.
People actually being sorry and taking care of their mistakes is VERY rare
^ And thats why it should be appreciated and applauded when it does happen
No see because it's not that we think we're right, we understand by listening to other people on other discords that we messed up, we want to continue making these podcasts because it's a way for us to give back to ArmA, but evidently we made the wrong choice in what subjects to talk about
We don't have a problem with people making mistakes, the real problem are the people that knowingly do such stuff, and animate others to do the same
Btw its Arma, latin word for weapons, not ArmA (The sub-name of the first Arma: Armed Assault)
Also its Arma not arma 
i cri
'd
I was selfish for talking about it, but since i knew the how's I wanted to explain to others, as I felt I was being helpful to people, but after listening to other people's sides i agree that wasn't the right choice
Like genuienly I wouldn't have posted that if I knew i was going to upset people.
Alright. The editing is done. This whole situation is overall kinda new to us so please bare with us.
No worries
the main issue is having this sort of thing as a rule not an exception
taking stuff because you can. there is no point carrying this discussion further, i personally have already made my mind up about it
@zealous ore we are in the wrong and you are free to dislike us, even for the rest of time, but we will try better ourselves mate we don't want this to be associated with us because it just sets a bad precedent for the rest of the time that we wish to do our podcasts for.
in any case, i have taken the necesary steps (bloking twitter accounts etc) and have all the info required to take further action if iโll be forced to
That is fair and I understand that and I do not blame you for that.
i could care less if you had tbh
๐คท๐ฝโโ๏ธ
seen this sort of stuff before, the appology is there just because you got called out. nothing much will change, maybe youโll just avoid talking about it from this point on, but that doesnโt actually mean you made any sense of why you got the response you did
pity, because thereโs more like you that have the exact same mentality
anyways, back to more important matters, wasted enough of my own time with this
Is it a thing to license mission files? something like a txt within the folder that exclaims you are not to reuse these missions for reuploads/on another server.
rarely seen it. but you could make it a thing if you wanted to
I'd imagine it would be a thing in the life scene, they are usually very possessive of their mission files, but on the other hand the life scene usually just steals whatever they like and doesn't care about licenses.
could i License a mission file under APL-ND although it states mods in one of the pages?
https://www.bohemia.net/assets/img/licenses/images/license_chart.jpg?4 (chart I went by to look for what I want)
https://www.bohemia.net/community/licenses/arma-public-license-nd here it repeatadly uses material which is more of a broad phrasing to me
Also does a statement like
"DP-27 holds the rights to revoke your permission to use the mission file"
in a txt hold any worth? or is it junk
the chart is just a guideline, not the actual writing
as licenses are usually applied to mods, it writes about mods
in a txt hold any worth?
yes.
Actually by default its your copyrighted content and noone is allowed to do anything with it, without a license, so technically you don't need to write anything. Practically most people think when nothing is forbidden, everything is allowed.
if push came to shove how would you prove ownership of the mission file?
Author entry in mission.sqm, have WIP pics...
alright thanks
Would anyone from Bohemia have an opinion on whether it would be legal to take editor preview pictures from ARMA 3 for items that I would like to use as inventory items, remove the grey "VR" background and add to a mod (as a minor bit of the mod) so that they show up nicely in the inventory. An answer of mail Karel is fine...
Obviously with a note that the images are (c) Bohemia Interactive a.s
Not an expert or BI, but I'm fairly sure sharing screenshots from the game is perfectly fine. It wouldn't be any different than using one as a mission preview image for example. As long as you don't include the actual models in the mod.
Oh you probably meant using the existing game images and not making them yourself. I don't know about that then. But recreating them from scratch is super simple too if you don't get a definitive answer.
I think that if you can access it without violating any sort of encryption they are free range for use as long as they dont leave the game
I may be reading this wrong, but my impression is that Grahame is asking (quotes mine) "Can I alter/manipulate a default image and reuse it in a mod?". Is this correct @abstract crest ?
i read it as that too, basically can he take the editor preview imagery (game data), and edit it to fit the needs of his arma 3 mod.
you could just take your own image of the item, and use that. Then you have no issues to think about
you can auto generate that same image aswell with the preview generator script
That is correct @old jay the issue with the autogeneration is what I am trying to get around. The image is screenshotted by the game on VR terrain so it has a grey not transparent background. That begs the question of can I export those images using the tool, make them transparent and upload @brave knot
The issue of doing my own images is problematic without those items. Most stock images are not free and most are someone's IP even if a web page you may see them on doesn't say that @inland sphinx
without those items.
you don't have the items that you want inventory icons for?
Oh you mean actually go in, place them in VR and take a screenshot (not using the wiki exporter) and manipulatebthevresults?
I just posted a method in #arma3_texture
Thanks @elfin coral Very familiar with those tools - even submitted an updated version to improve one to Bohemia :)
np, inventory images is a topic that there's not a guide for iirc
I have some custom tools myself which I used for my arma 3 library site, it's handy just being able to have the game render them straight out to images
OT but I really have to finish up the consolidated exporter I was doing for the CUP folks. A lot more flexible and usable
I wish to make a warlords RHS compat addon and upload it to the steam workshop, after reviewing their license I understand that I can make the addon AND upload it to steam WS?(double checking before i get sued)
Making a compat mod is completely fine.
ok cool, one thing that always bothered me was that it seemed like a difference in RHS Configs made vehicles never spawn in with sectors. making me have to place every single one and path them myself
As long as you don't include assets from RHS and be careful with retextures everything is OK.
And based on what you want all you'll need are some configs which either require RHS or point to RHS.
im thinking New faction of rhsgref Inherit the units and make the config groups to vanilla standard(mechanized armored etc) and (hopefully) that fixes the issue .
Reupload of TFAR https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2183126874
And "Sounds recorded from War Thunder" https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2183126632
I need to report that to War Thunder Devs? Right?
@wicked maple yeah, please do so
@proud vault I would appreciate if you can take down that unapproved TFAR reupload to the workshop. If you want to add compatability for a mod, make a compat mod but don't reupload other peoples content without permission.
ALSO FYI you are violating our #rules and I will proceed accordingly should you not take down that reupload.
@inland sphinx Hello. The author of the mod TFAR - [TF]NKey, TF squad of administrators on the RBIF server for which the mod was made. This mod is used on the server and is now publicly available to everyone. Changes are not possible without interfering with the mod, so it is rebooted. We are from the same community and everyone knows about each other. If there is a complaint from the author, the mod will be deleted.
@wicked maple Hello. The sounds are based on those that are in the game of war thunder, it's not the same sounds from the game. In music, this is called "cover". I like the game war thunder and I could not even write out of the game. Tanks sound different.
So NKey signed off on that upload? Didn't hear from him for a long time
Sounds weird that nkey would sign off on a upload that doesn't even write the name of the mod correctly
The sounds are based on those that are in the game of war thunder, it's not the same sounds from the game
The description on that workshop item says otherwise though, it says the sounds are recorded from the game. Which is definitely not "based on"
In music, this is called "cover".
Yeah but thats a very different thing...
You also state that you took "your" mods config from someone else too
Config is taken from Alan, the Real Panzer mod
Please clarify these descriptions, as they currently are, they are clearly not legal.
Nkey is long gone. TF squad knows everything. Alan and I have a friendly relationship, he uses my work in his Addons, I use his. I think we need to change the descriptions, there are too many misunderstandings.
"long gone" well I mean I didn't hear from him for a few months
So he didn't approve of your upload? Because I didn't either..
Sounds very much like you violate our #rules with that then
๐ฟ
he can write to me or one of his friends
You know I took over maintenance of TFAR, and the version you modified and reuploaded there was made by me?
And that steam subscriber agreement forbids you to reupload content without permission?
I don't know if the mod is reloaded just because it can't be done, or if I don't know how to do it on top of the addon. If someone can do this I will be grateful.
If you can tell me what changes you needed, I can show you how to do it without reuploading and modifying the original
old TFAR just uses CfgFunctions, if you need to modify code you can just redirect functions
" radio station in the tank works only for the commander and the radio operator shooter. In the original, the gunner, commander, and shooter." I changed this in the scripts. All other changes I was able to make without affecting the main mod.
Yes I know, if you tell me what scripts you changed, I can show you how to make a patch mod
OK, I'll send it to PM later
lol, this made my day
Is it (legally) allowed to unpack PBOs from [...]/Arma 3/Addons?
BI's own .pbos? Yes it's allowed and indeed necessary for some aspects of addon-making. There's an app in the official tools that unpacks all the game data as part of the P:\ drive setup, and BI provide the bankrev tool for the purpose of opening their .pbo files
What you do with their unpacked data is where there are limits on what's allowed and not allowed. Data that you are not allowed to unpack is in other formats such as .ebo
So I assume using a .paa obtained from a BI .pbo as basis for a (vehicle) texture is no problem but indeed the correct way and, for official assets, the only way?
It's tolerated at least
Thanks for clearing that up!
Hey guys, I have a question re; monetisation. I have made an addon which uses assets from a single pack on ArtStation which has an extended/unlimited license. There is a community which wishes to use my mod on their monetised server which is already approved and registered with BI. As I have an extended license for these assets, am I allowed to allow this community to utilise my mod?
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/677333591361060929/740685255958200390/image0.png
https://media.discordapp.net/attachments/677333591361060929/740685257204039870/image1.png
Pertinent screenshots of the license. This is a stock asset with an extended license.
I think the following line should say enough:
for personal use on an unlimited number of personal projects that are not used or distributed in any commercial manner
which get reinforced by:
directly or indirectly assist, facilitate or encourage any third party to carry on any activity prohibited by this Agreement.
Section 5.i
So releasing a mod with the assets bought by you should be fine, but afaik does it not allow monetisation in any way.
Although that's my view on it, so the best was to be sure is to ask ArtStation for this specific case (which might be hard to explain to someone who doesn't understand how Arma Monetisation works).
You're clipping out the second part of that:
and with respect to any number of commercial works, with no limit on sales or views
which is a modification of the standard commercial license that states:
and [with] respect to one commercial Work, with up to a maximum of, as applicable, 2,000 sales of the Work or 20,000 monthly views of the work
My asset is under the extended license as opposed to the standard license which states
If you have purchased an Extended Commercial licence then you may exercise your rights under that licence:
for personal use on an unlimited number of personal projects that are not used or distributed in any commercial manner; and with respect to any number of commercial Works, with no limit on sales or views.
So with it instead being part of the โunlimited useโ option per se, does that sound more viable? Not an issue for me really if not, itโs not my server.
I've told the bloke he's okay to use it on his server. After reading that extended license a few times, I feel pretty confident that is within the intended use.
Technically NO ONE can monetise as the monetisation program has ended (per its publicly posted end date).
You may, but ONLY if you have proper permission from all of the authors of such mods. Monetizing without it contravenes our licenses.```
and with respect to any number of commercial works, with no limit on sales or views
I read that as "no minimum limit, EVERYTHING is commercial even if just a few cents"
Or maybe they mean they are two types of extended license, one for only personal use, and one for commercial work
@old jay
Technically NO ONE can monetise as the monetisation program has ended (per its publicly posted end date).
What? It didnt no.
What are your sources? Here is the real one:
https://www.bohemia.net/monetization/
Where is that /dev page linked to?
that's not linked on the official size and clearly way out of date ๐ค
@thick vigil ^
Yup
Say I'd like to make winter versions of livonia foliage, would that be not allowed?
It would not be yeah
mentality check
sometimes i think that the virus needs to hit harder.....
sorry
@lean plover btw, you lads should do some deep searches, found like a ton of cup re-uploads while doing it today for RHS
i know... but i'm desperately lacking the time and tbh the motivation to engage with arma. hope that changes soon.
but the issue with deep search is, nearly half if not more turns out as false positive for models that are from the public data pack and reused by other modders (mostly terrains related)
weapons, units and vehicles are on another page ofc
most i've seen had cup_ tags, so there's that
ok, that's something different then. thx for the heads up. maybe @golden topaz got some time on his hands
he has done a great job in the past
the issue with deep search is, nearly half if not more turns out as false positive for models that are from the public data pack
Maybe automate parsing the results with some kind of whitelists. Or ask Ayano to add that feature to his crawler (doesn't it have it already? ๐ค )
i have to say, last time i did a deep search was with the old system. i haven't done a search with the new crawler
@fiery egret @lean plover the only way to get rid of these results is to use the filter function on the website, where you can exclude files from your own item
There you'd need to provide the file names to exclude or full paths to them to exclude them
@lean plover @golden topaz this is a bit of an ass - https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2127320218
doesn't look like he's on this server.
no..
we should keep him in mind for the next reupload
no..
as far as we know that is.. I always have the hope that steam will someday choose to just ban repeat offenders outright.
Could still comment that CUP also is against use of their content in this mod.
(and state that reuploads after dealing with RHS DMCA will be DMCA'd by CUP as well.)
Though, their own collection has all CUP mods listed as well, so maybe they are just retexs?
the dude has a lot of files on that "core" thing that isnt his own
and has the audacity to put a ducking license on other people's work
All rights reserved to ARMA 3 Middle East
I respect everyone's copyright and all rights are reserved to ARMA 3 MIDDLE EAST.
Is that possible? ๐ค
nope
Gawd CUP has a G+ account. ๐
also, for people such as myself and others that do use the existing crawler, you might wanna throw some monies towards @patent copper patron here -
https://www.patreon.com/rtt
i wish i had some patreon only goodies, but so far i havent come up with any ^^
i know, advertising, but what the heck, its for a good cause
@patent copper no need dude, just do what you do
i know,
advertisingreuploading, but what the heck, its for a "good" cause.
@zealous ore Sounds familiar... ๐
@wintry yoke :)) oh well, i'll be waiting for my ban then
DMCA
@zealous ore correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't see CUP nor RHS files in the mod you linked earlier?
this is what I see in its contents: https://i.imgur.com/12bEivb.png
@wintry yoke contains rhs retextures using rhs tags (hence why i seen it)
Why does "[BrigRR] Shepherd of Fire" sound familiar ?
@scarlet smelt You can ask the question about RHS to @zealous ore here.
OK, good luck then! ๐
OK, good luck then! ๐
@wintry yoke
Thanks again for the help
No problem!
@zealous ore
Hello
How are you doing
I have read your message that arrived via the Steam platform
Which belongs to MOD Arma 3 IRAQ WARFARE MOD 2020 https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2127320218&tscn=1597079908
And I did not understand what the issue or problem is
Please note that we did not violate any rights and did not use anything related to RHS Red Hammer Studios
However, my friend mistook the name between Red Hammer and RH Robert Hammer
Therefore, we are sorry for this unintended mistake
We do not make money or dealers from MOD
Just for play and fun like the rest of the Arma3 community
And if I did not understand well, please explain to me and what we must do to settle this
With all respect and appreciation to you
@scarlet smelt That item contains tons of other unauthorized reuploads violating the steam subscriber agreement and our #rules, please take down EVERYTHING that you do not own/have made yourself/have explicit permission for
@inland sphinx
Well thank you for the clarification
Work is underway on that now
With all due respect to you and your intellectual and property rights
Stay safe, friend
Many wishes for you
And we apologize that we caused you any inconvenience
Also keep in mind for mods like this
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2186112958 Where its just a plain reupload of someone elses mod, you CANNOT just change the license of someone elses content.
Here you are taking ACE, and just slapping APL-ND license onto content that's not even yours, you cannot do that.
@Dedmen
But we need the frying time to work on that and we do not want our mod on the Steam platform to be deleted because of your report.
Knowing that I am new to work with the person responsible for this, and when I ask him what is happening
It turns out that the person does not know much about matters of rights and fair use, and he read that by verb until he did not understand much
And he is a good person
But the question here
In the event that the Texter have been modified, such as changing color or adding a logo
And a lift on a steam platform, is that allowed?
@inland sphinx
@inland sphinx
Thanks for help
@zealous ore I hope you will answer my question when you are there. Thank you
@scarlet smelt seems you have removed the files in questionalready. the DMCA report is/was in relation to the following\
- keeping rhs tags on retextures - i use an automated tool to deepscan files and hash check them - i just redid the same procedure right now, seems these files have been already removed, i also manually checked your steam upload
- reuploading other mods without consent and changing their license as you please.
if you check http://www.rhsmods.org/page/EULA#re-textures there is this part that is very important
While in general we choose to tolerate re-textures of our original content, as per RHS NoDerivatives End User Agreement , we reserve the right to enforce our IP rights at our own discretion upon certain or all files, in accordance, but not limited to, the original author desire.
that means that indeed, in general, we do tolerate retextures, but we can always choose to enforce our non-derivative EULA, which is precisely what i do when i see fellow modders IP rights stepped on
Good guy PuFu 
I always check the files before i DMCA > also, we cannot remove the DMCA claim from your upload. I will send Steam Legal an e-mail to tell them files in question have been removed, but just as well, they will be contacting you themselves about it.
i hope the above solves the issue. understand that i have filled over 40 DMCA just today, i do not have either the time, nor the patience to talk to each individual party who's in the wrong, just because they cannot follow other people End User Agreements and Steam Terms of Service.
@zealous ore
Hello again
Thank you for the response and the frank explanation
B Actually, I explained the matter to the person in charge, and when he understood the matter, he deleted everything
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2127320218&searchtext=IRAQ
And his question was specifically, I want to amend the re-textures only, and I do not want to steal or change anyone's work, and on the contrary, I respect the property rights, but I did not know that my work for this has violated the terms of re-textures use for all the material
And he thanks you from his heart for your good and respectful treatment with him
And this message from him is addressed to you, I just convey it as it is:
`***The message says.
Hello Arma3 community, officials and workers.
My name is Ali
from Iraq
I had a simple desire and dream since the days of the Arma
game
I embody the Iraqi army and Iraqi special operations I.S.O. F
and what happened in my country of wars that I witnessed and part of them.
I lost my brother in the battle and was injured, which made me leave the military profession
And my savior was the game Arma
Do not be surprised
And I will not go into more details
I wanted to embody what happened in my country inside the game, and we have a wonderful audience who love the idea and the game
But I swear to you that I respect all rights and I did not mean any of this
I'm sorry about that:
If there is any way you have to help me do that, I ask you to advise and act
With regard to you
And best wishes`***
That was his message, I just translated it:
RYAN
Star Wars Opposition Mod team, they were caught with stolen assets, right? Someone came to me offering to help with Project H2H who's involved with their team and I want to confirm I made the right decision in turning them away.
Alright, thank you. My understanding of them was/is very limited, knew enough to be uncomfortable though.
"Is it a well known/big IP/Film/Company? -> Don't get involved" is more or less the one to always have in mind.
Dude that ripped the RHS scopes's got Enhanced Movement mod reuploaded (https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2127730830).
Reuploads are amusing a bit today. I have found multiple groups that have reuploaded my mod without taking the main.pbo. All the other modules depend on it, without it they can not work as they depend on an API exposed by it. Of the 7 reuploads only 3 of them can possibly work. Their logs must be filled with errors especially if they do that with other mods too.
My mods also have a main.pbo, so will be fun if they try to combine them ๐คฃ
That likely explains the occasional person popping up and saying stuff doesn't work and I can never find anything wrong with it. They must be in one of those communities that has done a hack job.
maybe they repacked your main.pbo contents into another pbo?
Sometimes I set fake config entries, and scripts in my missions so I can catch people when they steal my work.
^ I remember a long long time ago while helping you setup Exile on a A3 server that I never saw fake shizzle ๐
(Spokane survivors was the community iirc)
lol
I didn't do it for that, but there was a incident were I sorta wanted to call out a group of players who basically just copy and pasted stuff, edited a few values, and called it 100% their creation.
It would be like me and my KP_Liberation stuff, Yea sure I done enough work to put my name on it, but I would never deleted credit for KP who did the groundwork.
If I license my code under ALP-SA and somebody uses (a modified version of) that code in their project, does APL-SA force them to release their entire project under APL-SA or just my code (that they may have modified)?
I've been trying to decide between APL and APL-SA for months now...
Share-alike is a copyright licensing term, originally used by the Creative Commons project, to describe works or licences that require copies or adaptations of the work to be released under the same or similar licence as the original.
From: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Share-alike
Describes it very well. The license applies to only content it refers to. Not the whole project. If they have a technical way to release your thing X standalone then they must do that. If it is something they can not seperate from the rest of the published files then they need to put it all under the license to not violate the terms.
So the uhh drawback of the APL is that someone could simply re-release my work under a different license?
no, noone can alter the license on your work
But what's the difference to APL-SA then? Now I'm even more confused 
I've stared at that flowchart on the bohemia site for way longer than I'd like to admit, but I've not come across the wiki page yet.
Let's hope I got it right this time:
APL: If someone contributes to my code, they can release the result under any noncommercial license of their choice.
APL-SA: If someone contributes to my code, they can only release the result under APL-SA.
A mission using my code can be released under any license of the mission author's choice irrespective of the license applied to my code.
Is my understanding correct?
Unless the license is share alike (-SA) the person can release it under any license that does not infringe any terms of your license. If it is SA they must choose exactly the same license for a copy of your code that they might have remixed
If you do not care how people use it as long as it is non-commercial then use APL. If you want to make sure that all variations of your code can again be remixed by others then go with the -SA version. Someone could choose to not allow remix or transform of their modified version of your file. Making it a deadend of possible enhancements. If it's SA people can just use it again as long as they also release under SA.
Because of that SA licenses are usually a no-go for when looking at libraries to include within a project because it limits the freedom of choice regarding licenses for what is built with it. I personally recommend the non SA version. So simply APL. It ensures non commercial use and the people that modified your code have freedom of choice if they want to allow another remix of it or not.
Thank you for the advice kind sirs!
Would I be allowed to add the insignias available on the BI store into a mod?
https://store.bistudio.com/products/a2-cdf
https://store.bistudio.com/products/a2-napa
https://store.bistudio.com/products/a2-chdkz
https://store.bistudio.com/products/a2-hred
https://store.bistudio.com/products/a2-flag
https://store.bistudio.com/products/a2-patch
They're all pretty nice

๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ๐ฅ