#ip_rights_violations
1 messages · Page 50 of 1
I never post stuff I find becuase I find 32432432 possibly stolen things a day and I can't tell if it's even a breach 99% of the time. But why would anyone ever do this?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1521210155&searchtext=boat
Because he wants to mess with @dull moon
Not If it's a arma 2 port. But If it's a CUP rip, i will rain down hell on him
Lets make an annual holiday where we all reupload cup mods to give chris something fun to do 😂
"Now I have a DMCA - HO HO HO"
His other workshop item is for Garry's Mod. Makes total sense.
Old M'Chris gave a ban, E-I-E-I-O
@dull moon he says he took the model from CUP. So one would assume that it's a CUP rip
Merry cupmas 👌
😄
@sweet minnow @chilly silo Some of your stuff here https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1593710584
Thanks @snow bloom
No sweat
Ive DMCA'd it it wont be up for too long
MBG = @proud flicker ? - If so he's got your stuff too - https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1593755534
Thanks for the ping. That is correct.
Thanks @snow bloom
@fossil basalt I didnt post on that one. I only posted on the vehicles
thats the one i linked for Mondkalb
My bad, been looking at the wrong link
They typically don’t rush on those matters. Give them time.
BI
@brisk ember moderators don't have access to the steam workshop uploads.
We can only regulate on this Discord. And even then, only whilst listening to Warren G. True story.
@faint nacelle indeed, however i have found a very similar model on sketchfab: https://sketchfab.com/models/3b24723e86d546ee97afff16c516ef9c
this is the one i originally downloaded: https://3dwarehouse.sketchup.com/model/u2df71782-85e9-4cdb-a813-5f6ebd9af8b7/Doppelmayr-6-CLD-Detachable-chairlift-bottom-station
i wrote to the first author (since they had an email), i mean i want to buy the legit one 😄
maybe they are unrelated, even if they do look very similar
just a fyi
the second guy seems legit too: https://youtu.be/zbrI8wYd5zc and now i don’t know what to do, it’s not like that there are a gazillion models of chairlifts out there 😄
@brisk ember thanks
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1425914759 thissays 3CB too. But doesn't contain 3CB. But instead contains USAF @queen wing
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1425912648 USAF in here too and also no 3CB in there
@soft egret thx
Thanks
Hey is it allowed to upload a Server modpack (with mods from other content creator) on the Steamworkshop? and if not what can you do against it
yea but everytime i do a DMCA on a pack i get a email with "However, you do not provide an original link to the content being infringed upon. Please provide an original link to the content so that we can assist you with your complaint. " What do i need to send them. My Workshop link to the Mods or a normal download link? (Because the mods arent uploaded to the workshop)
just any link to your original work
It doensnt have to be source filed or anything right?
@desert sparrow
what mod are we talking about. what is it you don't want to be uploaded?
just some mods for a lifeserver cars. clothing like backpack hats. But they all named Rapumpel_(modname)
i dont want to upload them because the lifeservers arent that nice and just take stuff.
(to the workshop)
got me links to your stuff?
can i DM you?
sure
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1587961756
^ Took a DMCA 3 weeks ago and already reuploaded a new modpack with:
TFAR
VSM
TRYK
HAFM
Plus breaking TeamSpeak and Bohemia Monetization Rules.
They're not gonna last long...
And for whatever reasons, they have another upload also with the mods above:
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1593419899
That's total nonsense xD
Both are still up for me, you sure your internet was working? 😁
@desert sparrow I can see why Valve asked for proof on "your mod". It is very very rare for a modder to have just one item of high quality like that.
@desert sparrow it's easiest for Steam if you have a upload of your own content. Then they can easily cross reference and verify
@lone basin do you have link to their website. So that I can report for monetization violation?
nvm. Got it
Im going to upload them but im going to make it private if needed i can change it
Okey reported them to BI. Now onto the DMCA....
Somehow one of their reuploads already disappeared
Repentz and Psisyn apparently got the money they wanted, Repentz and his guys left Arma-life and the old crew took the server over again and cleaned up the modpack.
Currently in progress of re-aquiring all their monetization approvals and getting everything back to how it was before.
Is there an official statement about this?
The previous arma-life admin who gave the server to PsiSyn just told me that his old crew is back and threw all the "scum" out
The guy who I gave permission to half a year back
It's a very recent thing it seems. Just yesterday Travis Butts was still in charge there. I'll definitely wait till I see the new/old modlist in the next couple days
https://forums.arma-life.com/staff/ that page has already been updated
They didn't fix the modpack yet.
No excuse for not pulling it down.
Just a shame the old crew also used mods which violated monetisation stuff, they never had approvals for most mods, who do you talk to @soft egret
@dull moon
https://www.spartangaming.co.uk/topic/871-required-mods-exile-altis/
https://www.spartangaming.co.uk/topic/871-required-mods-exile-altis/
https://www.spartangaming.co.uk/store/category/1-exile-store/
The following list includes the Required Mods and the Optional Mods on our Exile Servers Required Exile Mod CBA_A3 NIArms All in One Multi-play Uniforms Specialist Military Arms (SMA) [SG] Mod (Direct Download) Optional JSRS SoundMod JSRS NIA (Requires the main JSRS) JSRS SMA...
what am i looking at? @echo orchid
ahh damn, this one
https://www.spartangaming.co.uk/topic/3-required-mods-exile-chernarus-isles/
The following list includes the Required Mods and the Optional Mods on our Exile Servers Required Exile Mod CBA_A3 CUP - Terrains Core CUP - Terrains Maps Chernarus Isles NIArms All in One Multi-play Uniforms DS Houses Specialist Military Arms (SMA) [SG] Mod (Direct Download)...
They do link to the correct steamfiles though. Is it because of their shop i.e monetization? https://www.spartangaming.co.uk/store/category/1-exile-store/
@dull moon my pleasure, got a report, the one i went after reported 2 more, one was this one 😄
group snitching i call it (but but, why can't we do it when X and Y can??? bu hu hu)
@native mist Chris Stark. But that was back in the beginning when I started giving out monetization approvals. My controls are more thorrough now.
🤔 yeah well he’s definitely not very trustworthy if he didn’t admit to all the mods that were breaking monetisation they had, or the pay to win elements of it
Well he'll have to fix it now, or stop monetizing
Can’t wait to see what he tries and pulls, he was a snake before and I doubt anything has changed 😂
are people (mod authors) asking server owners to provide written permission for all the mods they are running before said server is allowed to run cups?
im not sure how i feel about other people policing my mods without even consulting me...
@stark mulch for monetization they need written permission from all mod authors. I would think its not about policing other peoples work but to ensure the server is actually legit.
if theyre not monetized there are no issues
its also not imaginary rule but what BI has dictated for monetization approval
nothing here says written https://www.bohemia.net/monetization/faq#!#c7
@faint nacelle ive been doing this for awhile i know the crack 😉
<--- veteran
I know youve been around.
proper permission is of course open for interpetation but how else can you prove you have permission if its not written down?
it isnt another mod authors place to police my content
Was just about to write that.
I'm not following, so someone is trying to control a mod you created?
no
i understand other mod authors want to be asked for every use of there mod
but, like i said in the first msg, i dont know how i feel about other people policing my mods
do you have an example of this?
I mean Ive heard people adding licensse clause that monetization permission gets revoked if server uses mods they have no permission for
im in this situation now, someone want written permission from me to use one of my mods
so they can provide it CUPs
why does my permission regarding my content matter to anyone but the 3rd party and me?
you probably got to look at what CUP has in their lincense
so they can provide it CUPs doesn't make grammatical sense?
are they asking for monetization permission?
to cups*
If they want to monetize. They need your permission for your mods
what is "to cups"?
What do you mean?
@undone pier do you know what "USP" is? Some life group?
someone wants written permission from me to use one of my mods on a moniztized server but cups monization approval is dependent on my permission
@soft egret no it’s a gear mod
i think thats right lol
Ah I understand. Some people (me included) have a "if you use anyone elses mod without permission, My permission automatically get's revoked" clause. And thus want to make sure that that is not the case when they give out permission
TLDR the vehicle mod guys who had a sketchy history with rippers/porters on the team and stolen models are upset that I pulled out all my assets from their mod since they went back to using rippers and porters to help import items into the game
But a blanket statement wont work?
Thus, They need to verify that they have permission to use the mods that they are trying to use.
Exactly same as they need to BI. They need your permission anyway to tell BI that they have it
@manic lark If it's on workshop just report it and/or send the link to dwarden with the notice that it is using ebo's and contains ripped content. It will be removed
EBO's are not allowed to be used on the workshop
And it’s never been on workshop
Then it probably doesn't matter much
I thought they aren’t allowed to be used at all?
correct
Okay cool
Hate to be 'that guy', but does anyone know where I can find a list of rules or information on what I can, and can not do to protect my IP? As EBOs are not the correct way to do so?
im not trying to be a twat but i have been on both sides of this coin. I feel you might be acting abit overzealous regarding enforcement of BIS rules. At the end of the day is it your responsibility to police A) BIS rules B) over peoples content?
No it's not. I just don't want to give people permission. Just to revoke it again half a second later
waste of time
Yeah, but the DMCA's are hardly effective on dropbox links shared over Discord for example. So I was inclined to look for other methods.
They need to have the permission anyway, whether someone asks about it or not.
Based on the fact that, that guy asked you just because he wanted to use CUP, probably means he wouldn't have asked you if CUP didn't require it. Essentially using your mod without permission, violating the CUP permission requirements and the BI monetization rules
Or make amazing mods and don't let the community use them if that's the way you think mod authors should think Andrew
If you want mods to exist, there needs to be something in place that'll protect their IP
Or just make everything open source. Then everyone will be able to look up who wrote some awesome code. Also helps others learn from your content and is also good for your resume
@brisk ember Same with a youtube video. There is nothing in place to prevent people from downloading youtube videos and reuploading them on dropbox.
Do content creators stop making videos?
It doesn’t sound like he is trying to protect the next cup 😛
More of like a server mod or something like that, because sharing via dropbox link or passing around like that isn’t too common for an open mod
Correct @soft egret but Andrews reasoning "then don't make mods" doesn't help with protecting against it
YT could at least make it "impossible" to download it
Well arma making it impossible to download pbo's doesn't seem reasonable 😄
Sure you can just hide it from everyone
No but that's because it's an entirely different platform :P
I'd say just let your stuff be open, put watermarks and your name all over it and be done with it
Hm true
Nah. We know what BI can do about it. They just don't want to invest the time
talked about that more than enough already
Not very mod-friendly
Yea
Re: permissions- does a blanket statement not cover your mod?
Like “I allow monetization to be used with this mod enabled on the server”
Or do people still have to reach out
A public blanket statement that it's allowed to monetize is fine
Or if the mod is licensed under a license that explicitly allows monetization
the problem here is when the author has abandoned the arma scene, personally if you (enforcer) knows the mod author is against/requires permission then ask for the written statement but if someone is "gone" and not taken shit down, do you think they care (probably not)
for me, that falls in the common sense realms (which isnt covered "legally" of course)
if someone is "gone" and not taken shit down, do you think they care (probably not) doesn't matter. If he's gone and you cannot get permission. Then you simply cannot monetize the mod. period.
So if EBO's aren't allowed on SW, why are there still mods up there which use it?
as long as reasonable attempts at contact are made too
@runic wraith because there is essentially just one guy that takes care of it
But these are mods that have been up there for quite some time now, with nothing done to remove them as far as I've seen. I understand it takes time, but these have been known for awhile
have you reported them?
flagging in SW and adding comment contains EBO could be one step
and then emailing to BI
Guess that's a start, be kinda strange if I'm the first one to report these for doing so. See what happens from there
it only takes one responsible user. Some of that content may not be intersting enough to subscribe for others who would report them
or look if they are ebod.
or know thats forbidden
Your average user doesnt look to see if they are pbo vs ebo
Not entirely that strange
also some people might ebo have ebod their stuff after a while
like modpacks who add stuff they should not
Number of attempts for contact shouldn't matter. No permission means no permission
No I understand that and I have been reading through the EULA for Arma 3 and can't seem to find anywhere it states that external encryption software isn't allowed to be used. But I'll do more research into our possibilities for encryption, as this seems to be a pretty grey area
@stark mulch did you talk to @dull moon yet? like is this said request from "CUPs" even true?
i see no reason for lying about why they needed written permission
and the community is mentioned a few scrolls up so 😛
the request is very true
as i am the one he told it to
apparantly even if the mod creator writes on their mod its allowed to be used on monetized servers you still need to get induvidual permisson for it for your server\community
@runic wraith pretty sure that ebo encryption key has to be reverse engineered from the binary (which breaks eula)
some mod creators have written that you can use their mod for whatever you want and however you want and don't even respond to questions about it since they have said it can be used for everyone
if a public statement along the lines of "montization is fine" is made, id say that is "proper permission"
yupp i would think so to, but i was told otherwise
apparantly even if the mod creator writes on their mod its allowed to be used on monetized servers you still need to get induvidual permisson for it for your server\community You don't. But if the mod owner wants you to do that before he gives you permission.. Then you do.
He can do whatever he wants
the thing is here, some of the mods i have says it can be used on monotized server and used by everyone as long as its no commercial gains, but then another mod creator says no i need to see written permission for it
for me to be able to get permission for his mod
as long as its no commercial gains monetization == commercial gains
from what i have read commercial gains in the mod is selling the item ingame for actual money
and that is against monetization rules by BI
tbh if someone put no commercial gains and allowed to be used on monetized they have miss understood something
from what i have read commercial gains in the mod is selling the item ingame for actual money no
and that is against monetization rules by BI no
most mod creators i have spoken to and asked permission for mod has said its fine to use it as long as that items is not sold for REAL money ingame and available to everyone
only thing you can do that with is uniform skins and paintings
i am all new to this maze and just trying to figure out everything
well, both yes and no
uniforms have different armor values, if you start to edit those and give more armor and only let a select people who pay for it have access to it, then its breaking the rules on monetizing
@soft egret are you someone who "represents" CUPs?
no
chris?
I don’t see why some of you are trying to make this so complicated.
From the rules:
You must get permission to alter someone else's work, to mirror their work or to use it in any way other than for personal use. Without permission please do not edit, mirror, add to your mod pack or edit and share around your private squad.
Get permission by communicating with the original content creator(s).
Personal use: for you, yourself, privately and without creating screenshots/ videos / etc.
huh? what are you referring to? i was talking about running x mod on server y
and if its appropriate for another mod author to police my monetization policy
Compare it to a stolen car.
Other people can report the car to the police if they know that the plate number belongs to a stolen car. They don't have to wait till you see it
im not required to report it
Using mods without permission is not allowed. Let's call it illegal.
If I allow someone to use my mod, while he is using mods without permission. I would also be involved in illegal activity
thats rubbish lol
by that logic, no mod author can give a blank "allowance" to use a mod on a monetized server?
Sure he can, as I already said
At the end of the day, it is the mod author who decides whether you can use their mod or not.
but not for the mod his mod depends on
If you choose not to give him proof that you’re using legit mods, he doesn’t have to give you permission.
yup this is were it got to last time.
Basically I dont want anyone "policing" my content, if people think I may not like a certain usage of my content then feel free to contact me. Im not going to provide written permission for every server CUP deems to be in breach of BIS rules.
If you are fine with your mod being monetized
i dont care, thats the point
then just write that down on the steam workshop download or whereever
CUP as in Community Upgrade Project?
because if it's not written down that you allow it. That means noone is allowed to unless they ask you for permission and get written permission by you
Have a look at the licenses and apply one. If not, the most restrictive applies.
look, how hard is this, my monetisation policy is my business and its not for anyone else (except BIS) to be enforcing it
i have told BIS my position with my content
Nobody else can enforce, people can only report (which is not enforcing)
that should be all that matters, no?
That’s not really how licenses work though.
BI doesn't have time to check. And mod authors know that. That's why they help BI in that regard
More than half of all the monetized servers were using mods without permission in the past. Because they told BI "yeah sure" when they asked whether they have permission for everything
thats fine and a mod author is welcome to send a report for his content
im asking people to ignore my content, no policing, no reporting, ill deal with it myself thankyou 😃
That's why we (AmA folks, which you are part of btw) chose to fix that by making sure that they have permission before we give them ours.
They need to have written permission anyway. If they don't that already tells us they don't have proper permission.
I'm not willing to give a lying thief permission to use my stuff and I'm not the only one with that stance. Sorry if that bothers you.
But honestly, if you are fine with people using your content. Just write it down then.
it really doesnt
it bothers me when ppl start pming me for written permission
for something a give 0 f's about
Let me say this ( regarding not using licenses). When we find a user using content without explicit written permission (on the forums, Discord, Workshop, etc) they are often banned. By not using a license and providing them with evidence that it is permitted, you are setting them up for failure.
They won't if everyone knows that you are fine with it. Like CBA and ACE and a couple other mods which have a very clear "Monetization allowed" license are doing.
So, put a license on it that says so
Put it in your forum signature at the very least
look users are idoits lol, they spend 2 mins searching then just pm the author
So that when they google your name, they can easily reference the permission.
and im honestly i feel like people shouldnt be enforcing my rights
They have to do that either way. Whether we ask them too or not. They already need permission to request monetization approval from bohemia.
Us asking to also see the permission doesn't change anything on that
its intrusive imo
if u personally know mod author x doesnt allow monitization then fair enough
We’re not enforcing YOUR rights, we are enforcing Bohemia’s rules.
That's what I do. I ask for permission for mods where I know that the author is either just not available anymore, or where I know he generally doesn't allow it
Bohemia says they must ask you. If you're upset about being asked, take it up with Bohemia, not the people here
Or pull your mod
Like FM said, adding a license explicitely giving permission is a step you can take
You can even add “Do not PM me”
or disable PMs from server members altogether (Privacy Setting)
One important thing that hasn’t been addressed is to ensure that the person who asked for CUP permission, doesn’t think that means the rest of the content as well (because someone will try that, guaranteed!)
Happened often enough already. Had tons of people who used Australia and said "The Australia guy gave me permission to use the stuff made by other mod makers that explicitly forbid monetization of their content. So that means it's all fine"
the FAQ on cup site does imply you have the right use (APLSA content) on a approved monetized server (following rules) does it not?
APL-SA == non-commercial
Needs explicit written permission to override the license
And that only applies to CUP Terrains
Only CUP Core and Terrains
All other CUP stuff is explicitly not allowed
ye APL-SA content
Monetisation is commercial
https://www.bohemia.net/community/licenses/arma-public-license-share-alike
Noncommercial - You may not use this material for any commercial purposes.
Only written permission can override/overrule/make an exemption to a license
so how does any of BIS's policies work if montization = commerical?
for example here https://gyazo.com/f05573bbf20a01016b916460d71e5c43
this means you should be able to use it on monetized server yes?
so how does any of BIS's policies work if montization = commerical?
By people asking the mod authors if they are allowed to monetize the mod and forwarding that to bohemia.
that too me says, if BIS approve your server, your free to use CUP core/terrain until they revoke the implied permission
does that part of packages include its updates? I'm no expert so this is more of a question; The packages Units/Vehicles/Weapons etc etc were initially released way before 01.01.2017. Does that mean you can never use those packages or are you allowed to use updates released after 01.01.2017?
@broken acorn "and you can charge for perks" only if the server has monetization approval.
@stark mulch https://www.bohemia.net/monetization/faq
On my server I am using mods created by other people. May I get approval to monetize?
You may, but ONLY if you have proper permission from all of the authors of such mods. Monetizing without it contravenes our licenses.
That are the monetization rules from Bohemia
@brisk ember nothing prior to 1.1.2017 can be monetized, even if APL-SA.
And after that only the APL-SA content (licenses for other things got changed)
Meaning you cannot grab a old version of CUP Units and just monetize it.
so that includes any updates (released after jan 2017) on those packages (initially released before jan 2017)?
WHY am i then getting asked to provide proof, when it clearly says they allow it under bohemias rules
last sentance
The CUP Team and all contributors reserve the right to change or withdraw this permission anytime.
and as a mod author, you can just say no to 1 server
even if its personal
so if CUP attach conditions to getting there approval, then that's there right
@broken acorn Because people maybe didn't read that command that's burried somewhere in the steam comments of some steam item.
Also the "Author" tag doesn't mean anything. Looks like it's staged. There are only two authors on all the NiArms uploads, and "Murphy" is neither of them.
That screenshot honestly looks like someone staged that. Just uploaded a workshop item to be able to reply with "Author" tag
Read what? I don't see anything relevant on page 5
ain't nothing there
Any persons or entities directly or indirectly involved with active development of Arma 3 Life OR Arma 3 Life derivatives ( additionally, by alias; Caiden). Stipulations - Do Not Redistribute, No alteration or de-binarizing of content, no use at all within publicly distributed data-archives(including executable installation) for entities that receive more than US$10 in lifetime donations. This exception applies retroactively. Failure to adhere to this will result in legal action.
Did no one read Toadies license?
murphy is a contributor
^ He doesn't dictate the license
He is contributor. On a all-in-one pack. That's basically just a repack of other mods where he is not listed as contributor
And yeah. The license is quite clear https://forums.bohemia.net/forums/topic/190455-niarms-release-thread/
if you want anything official, read the official release thread actually made by Toadie: https://forums.bohemia.net/forums/topic/190455-niarms-release-thread/
dammit dedmen
no no if license isnt included in release files, its irrelevent
Also Any persons who have directly contacted myself (toadie2k) to seek out explicit usage permissions retain use under agreed terms.
There. Only toadie can give out permission. Written by toadie itself
no no if license isnt included in release files, its irrelevent No that's not how that works
You mean. I can just rip your stuff. Take out your license text file and that means your stuff now belongs to me and I can do whatever I want with it, as there is no license included anymore?
Wat
erm i t hink it is lol
That's 100% not how it works
u cant just stick a license somewhere and say it applies to something else lol
All content released in Arma3 game-readable and Real-virtuality3 encoded content fall subject to the Arma Public Share-Alike (APL-SA) License, unless otherwise specified.
"All content released"
if no license is included in files its all rights reserverd
Yes, an author can. It'll sometimes even be specified in the readme of a mod "copy of license provided. If missing, look at APL-SA"
Well if no license directly visible, take it as "You can't do shit with it except playing" 😛
ye all rights reserved
but if the author (listed on the steam release) says its ok then whats the problem?
So that Murphy guy was still not right 😉
he is listed as a creator
Murphy is not an author
He is a contributor. Toadie is the creator
The creator of the mod himself wrote in his license that only he can give permission.
So sorry... But some third party guy can't just give permission for other peoples stuff.
Especially not if he tries to allow people to do something that the real creator has explicitly forbidden
And it is explicitly posted on the forum
well no wonder arma is losing its playerbase, most people cant afford to run servers because people dont donate
look at MGT Exile, they have to beg every month for donations
You mean those 125 player LIFE servers?
fuck life
so.... you have one example?
i am talking about the other mods\game modes
Over the thousands of servers?
Infinity Exile
all other exile servers that has shut down before that
was due to no funding
Exo
so limited to Exile then?
https://www.bohemia.net/monetization/approved/arma3 102 monetized servers.
https://www.battlemetrics.com/servers/arma3 5032 Arma servers with 10k players.
"most people" yeah.. not really
KOTH vanilla is allowed to monetise
Eh... pretty sure not everyone is even allowed to host a KOTH server
donations are not monetization. so its up to people.
pretty sure not everyone is even allowed to host a KOTH server Yes that's the reason why there aren't many KOTH servers.
there used to be alot more KOTH servers
Donations to cover cost are not monetisation
Well it's not monetizations fault
Many of the KOTH servers a couple months back weren't actually allowed to host KOTH game mode. Like all the boosted level servers.
KOTH staff put and end to all that.
So far we have been accepting donations on our server, do we have to apply for approval?
No, donations are still allowed. But remember – a donation is a gift without any counter value. If your donators receive perks or rewards for donating then we no longer consider it a donation and you have to apply for the approval.
Also there is absolutely no problem hosting a legit monetized server. Get permissions properly like many others are doing. And you are fine.
show me these many others, i doubt there is many that actually have permissions for everything
People who don't want to get permission, and don't want to pay for their servers. Are just in for the money and don't want to invest much time into their project
So far, many of the questions that have been asked are clearly answered on the Forum and in the FAQs
@broken acorn https://www.bohemia.net/monetization/approved/arma3 there.
Dedmen before you have been on our server i dont think you should comment about it
our income goes directly into the server and the players
People who don't have proper permission get reported and loose their approval within a couple weeks from them starting up. Most of the servers on that list are legit
we have had it for over a year
we have been reported twice before
we have the exact same mods as before
One would assume you would learn from that
wich was approved
we was not allowed to have cup weapons\vehicles and SFP i think it was
it was removed and permissions given back
uhhh
now suddenly everyone is making a big fuzz about it
so.. You had permission for your stuff. But you actually didn't. ?
Remind me to have the monetised servers re-checked
And now you complain about being reported for breaking the rules. And now having to actually play by the rules?
no i complain that i have to show proof for every single thing
Because you’ve already been caught stealing twice perhaps?
when some of the mods state that they dont really care how its used and the creators are not active anymore
we have not stolen anything
That's what happens when you show multiple times that you cannot be trusted.. People stop trusting you.
welcome to the world of not making your own content
we have plenty of content made by us
@broken acorn it is quite clear, no license == most restrictive default license
Go to the same shop with a fake $50 bill 3 times.
On the 4th time they'll either throw you out directly, or check that your bill is real before they accept it.
If you did your due diligence and obtained permission for everything, it should be really easy to zip whatever folder you saved that in and send it to whoever is asking
So “no longer around” or “not active” don’t factor into it.
All I see is you complaining about actually having to follow the rules that you swore to bohemia a long while ago that you will follow them..
I don't really understand what your problem is
he is policing the community he is apart of something bis and valve should be doing
anyways need to go now i will be back later
I'm not policing other peoples stuff. I'm policing bohemias rules.
As I said multiple times already today. People already have the written permission anyway if they follow bohemias rules.
And if they didn't, then they have no god damn right to monetize or even ask me about permission if their other stuff isn't even allowed to be used.
@broken acorn I’ll make it quite clear to you. You have been caught stealing. In direct violation of the agreement you made with Bohemia when you joined up. We have rules that you MUST adhere to. Failure to do so may result in a permanent ban for you and your group.
Oh look who's back again after my DMCA from two days ago https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1595988119
That will be his 4th DMCA tomorrow. Maybe we can observe if valve will act on that this time. He seems really stubborn
What do DMCAs do exactly besides take down your mod
exactly that
Apperently nothing much if they reupload it
Force people to take down my stuff
Oh
Correct. They can just reupload it again. After it's been taken down
They should get a workshopban like you can have a valve trade ban
Thats pretty stupid if you can keep doing it with no problems
Exactly that's what I meant. Maybe we can see valve actually doing the ban this time.
👌
DMCA's are in this content quite pointless unfortunately unless your super rich as counter clams are a bottomless pit for the creator and you get nothing from the infringer even if you win did it 3 times now and cost me a total of £1200 in costs and got £0.00 back and the guy just reuploaded.
gotta love russians
Shouldn't they have to pay when they loose?
nope
they are ordered to take it down but they just make a new steam account and reupload
or get friends todo so
never had a penny back
worst part is the infringer has never turned up to the court hearing and still no money back
international law i guess it might be different if its same country
valve dose take it down instantly though but it can just be reuploaded again on a new acount and the proccess starts again
Shouldn't it be enough for valve to just reference to the past successful DMCA that prooved that they did illegal counter claims multiple times?
nope
its case by case DMCA by DMCA even if the same guy uploads twice the same content you need two court dates or to have both in the same one
sorry bit drunkish crimbo week
Text on a kickass reupload:
This mod is Copyright claimed by Copyright Laws
For editing Puposes ask the author for premission or face charges
Who can beat that?
lol
Some real powerful law lingo in use there.
still waiting for the CopyLeft to be used by someone
right gonna turn off discord lol
keep it real peeps
Lol
ok, had a rough day, TL;DR, just went quickly over the matter:
i am (as CUP) are not enforcing other mod makers policies, not licenses.
i actually couldn't care less if i'm honest. it's every mod makers own decision how to enforce or ignore his/hers rights.
what i did/do is, i play by the rules BI has put on everybody of us if it comes to monetization.
Q: On my server I am using mods created by other people. May I get approval to monetize?
A: You may, but ONLY if you have proper permission from all of the authors of such mods. Monetizing without it contravenes our licenses.```
this means, either written permission by the author after a request, OR a clear statement included in an attached license, like "I, the author of this mod, hand out permission for monetization without the need of individual personal requests..."
next up:
we all know that BI hands out monetization approvals WITHOUT checking if the requester actually has permission to monetize the mods he wants to use. BI does not demand proof or anything, they just trust in the good of the people. well, i don't... what a surprise...
we at CUP follow a strict NO MONETIZATION line for all mods beside CUP Terrains Core and CUP Maps. this was the result of long and hard internal discussions. we then finally agreed that CUP Terrains Core and CUP maps "may be used on monetized server", but only because we actually did not edit much within these mods that would justify moving away from APL-SA to CUP-L.'
but still, our stance about monetization in general stands. it's f**king BS that kills the community.
and if smb still wants to monetize CUP Terrains Core and CUP Terrains Maps, i want them to proof me that they actually play by the rules BI set on us by sending me a screenshot of the permission(s). if they can not proof that they have permissions for ALL mods they use, as BI requires them to have, i do NOT hand out permission for the monetization of CUP Terrains Core and CUP Terrains Maps.
i suggest you change the cup faq, as at the moment it states monetization of CUP content that is licensed under APL-SA is ok unless otherwise revoked by an author/contributor
@dull moon Why do server owners need to show you all the written permissions if they have been using your guys chernarus map? like why now why not a year ago?
@stark mulch
although the rules by BI are clear, you are right. the FAQ could be misread
because right now its a huge pain in the ass to go over all the emails,discord pms and steam msg from over a year ago.
It should all be in a nice folder for proof
@carmine atlas
this was always the case, but only two ( 2 !! ) guys actually asked for permission to use. everybody else who does not have asked permission and got the BI approval is and will be reported
id say an official faq from the mod authors is "proper permission"
its not really me misreading it, its pretty clear
"may be used" =/= "allowed to be used"
that is what i ment by easy to misread
will be changed soon
to be more clear
may use is the same as allowed to use, come on lol
considering the second part
The CUP Team and all contributors reserve the right to change or withdraw this permission anytime.
i didn't write it since i'm no native speaker. i translate it to something like "could be used" as in "optional"
sorry
that says i have the implied right, that is why no one has asked you
might be the case, yes. the FAQ will be changed to a more clear statement
as how can something be withdrawn without it being given first?
cool, just pointing out the FAQ conflicts with the statement you made before
and i thank you for the headsup. like i said, i'm no native speaker and interpreted the statement like i've shown
meh idk im not rlly gonna comment more on this silly case. Its christmas and im at a families house. Happy hollidays everyone 😀 💕 💕 btw chris ur english is fine im not a native speaker either but i still understand whar ur saying.
but as you can see, details (i miss often) matter 😉
some more "author didn't answer so I can upload it" https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1593431569&searchtext=
Pretty sure Outlaw is around somewhere
yes. Atleast the start page works
try going for a search
start page works for me as well, when i search for a collection is fubars
filelist works. Run Scan... Works too. Until you get to the results. Then it brek
CU0IPRSQV1YV7TCX04ZRMGEEXGQEV3 @river spear oioioioio
Had the same happen to me a week ago. @river spear disk space full again?
I've had the same
ill look at it when I'm home, currently in uni 👌
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1594294213&searchtext=
@dull moon CUP_AirVehicles
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1594302331&searchtext=
@sonic blade sfp_bas90
Jbad, Brg_africa, Mbg buildings,
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1594308882
@soft egret TFAR 1.0.. Oh wait.. That's me.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1594177351&searchtext=
This mod is basically for use in the 11th Marine Division, it contains 3 vehicles from CUP 🤦
Atleast he's honest 🤷
I'm going through the latest steam workshop uploads. And somehow every single item that contains "life" in the name is vioating...
What a coincidence, people keep telling me that most life people aren't bad guys... I guess this is pure bad luck then...
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1590437062&searchtext= @stoic beacon tfar anims.
Kinda weird. tfar anims, but no TFAR 🤔
Also they mention the mods that they have in their pack, except for your anims.
Oh look, he also has two life packs.. What are the chances that they are clea... yeah. Oh god.. No.. No no no no... So not clean.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1590232800&searchtext=
personal modpack for mission making uhhuh.. Uploader: @civic hill (just banned him from TFAR discord)
RHS GREF, CUP Weapons, CUP Units, CUP Vehicles
@echo orchid @dull moon @fossil basalt
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1589629082&searchtext=
KKA3_ACE_Extension_Anim
kka3_ACE_Extension_Placeables
@civic hill nope that's not how that works
@soft egret thanks👌
@civic hill just by saying it's personal use doesn't make it personal use.
You uploaded it to the public...
Banned
Shines a bad light on whatever conference that is if such a guy can be in a panel about copyright shakes head kids these days
Banned from Forum as well.
@dull moon https://www.bohemia.net/monetization/approved/arma3
CodeRed Networks
https://www.battlemetrics.com/servers/arma3/2761862
CUP Weapons, Vehicles, Units, Terrains Monetized.
@stoic beacon your radio animations too.
Enhanced Movement too. TFAR too.
I'll report them for my stuff. Feel free to report them too.
👀
@echo orchid @burnt oak @soft egret should be fixed now
my silly minecraft server backups went ham and trashed one drive full of world backups lol
thats what you get for hosting a server for a friend
@soft egret do you have an answer already?
I guess I have to wait until after Xmas holidays for an answer from bi
No. He probably already went into his weekend
If you want mods to exist, there needs to be something in place that'll protect their IP I dont believe this is why you should be making mods, you make mods to have fun and put what you want in the game and to share with others. If you are worried about your IP being violated then the internet is the last place you should be. IP rights are violated everywhere, not just in arma. Now if you are making your own fully fledged game with a lawyer team to back you up then sure, but I believe alot of this is a waste of time. 🤷
Its not a reasonable expectation for everyone on the internet to do exactly as you say in your license. Its just not gonna happen.
Especially for a mod
Hell if you look at other modding communities for gmod and stuff its a hellscape compared to this
IP rights are violated everywhere
Just because everyone does it, doesn't make it legal nor morally "okay"
He didn't mean it's okey. He just means it's simply not possible to fully protect yourself
Right
I just think its a wasted breath
You could sit back and enjoy what you've created rather than worrying about policing it
I see your point. However, how can I enjoy my product if I know people around the community are ruining/defacing it?
by not caring
You have a point, but for me it's absolutely invalid.
That's something everyone has to decide for his own.
But you can not expect this kind of mindset from everyone.
The license is there to protect myself, I have the right to do so.
I think this discussion is useless tbh.
By simply not caring I could do alot of stuff different, but different is not exactly better.
I think this discussion is useless You are correct.
I’d have to disagree, I think whenever someone has concerns about protecting their IP and preventing their work from being stolen, it should be taken seriously. Not waved off by not caring, calling it a useless discussion, or just not doing anything. I believe you can still make mods, without having to not care for your work afterwards. Especially when some modders offer their models for sale on other websites.
You've misread what I'm responding to.
I am agreeing to Just because everyone does it, doesn't make it legal nor morally "okay"
and his follow-on posts. "I think this discussion
"I think this discussion is useless" in regards to trying to negate the importance of protecting IP rights.
The comments of Adam Duke sound like something "ripped" (pun intended) from a thieving "life" community.
Both
In the eyes of the law there is no difference between the two.
An individual has the same rights to their creations as does a large corporation.
wat
Next, some person who made a mod for Arma shouldn’t have those rights
wtf
You don't know how copyright law works at all...
GG
You might want to do a bit of research into intellectual property rights. Additionally, you may want to have a read of our #rules. Also, if correct grammar is off-putting, you may want to invest in a dictionary and a thesaurus.
Just get rid of that troll 🙄
Not a wise choice.
superficial knowledge is bad enough, but trying to argue based on that with mods... nope 😄
I missed the fun again, damn it
Just another troll.
fuuu
I hate that messages are deleted when someone is banned, cause then I miss out on them being stupid
@queen wing
even cba_3 reupload because that needed 🤔
It's actually a real shame that going through the workshop, anything with Life in the name, I can assume(and be correct) that it has stolen content in it
Only decent server that is still up is City Life
decent as in, not shady, not using stolen content
Thanks!
@carmine folio Take that down. Or you'll see your permission be revoked faster than you can blink.
Keep using your arma3sync or the official TFAR on workshop.
@soft egret It's good, I thought I left it privately. I deleted it from the workshop, sorry
Am I allowed to extract arma models if I want to make an addon with objects that should tightly fit arma's default vehicles?
@silent cloud Please clarify exactly what you mean please.
If you mean "am I allowed to extract models from the game to modify?" then the answer is no. The same applies to user made content as well. There are very few exceptions to this rule and all require permission from the authors to do so.
@fossil basalt Thanks. Let's say, if I wanted to add some armor pieces which will be attachable to a certain arma default vehicle. But in order to model them I need to have the model somehow. What's the best way to do that if I don't want to violate Bohemia's IP rights?
Unless Bohemia makes it available as a sample for public use, you cannot. The only option available is attachTo. https://community.bistudio.com/wiki/attachTo
Aren't you allowed to export a model, just to make your own?
If you want to make an "add-on" for a vehicle, like he does, can't he use the model from a3 to make his own model?
And then use attachto to add it to the vehicle?
If I understood him correct, he doesn't want to modify or use any model from a3 in his model, he just needs it to make his own model and then he deletes the a3 one.
m_kola is right, that's what I mean.
So, if I make an addon that adds the said armor plates for some vehicles, and they will be meant to be attachable through attachTo, without saying anywhere how the hell I made them fit the arma's vehicles so nice(I could have potentially guessed the dimensions)... is this OK?
No it's still against the eula.
Debinarizing a3 models is not allowed no matter what the purpose.
@fossil basalt stop deleting post history when you ban people xD
Nope. They don’t get a platform to spout their BS.
¯_(ツ)_/¯
If I edit default mission and run it on dedicated server, does it violate EULA and Game Content Usage Rules?
Which mission?
Always if you use other‘s content without permission it is against the rules. But what do you want to edit? I mean there is a mission there the campaign is switch to RHS. It is possible
@glass yacht imo, that's not a hugely problematic upload from that guy. ACE allows redsitribution and modification - removing the G-force PBOs from the ACE mod is modification of the mod, and changes the end result, meaning that you would be okay by the Workshop Terms of Service. It's a minor alteration, but it's still an alteration.
There's a ton of ACE reuploads without modification at all - those are the ones that should recieve scrutiny.
ACE allows reuploads if modified and clearly marked as not the official version.
Still be violating the subscriber agreement so you can report it for that. But not a #ip_rights_violations by itself. IP right itself is not violated, just steam eula
How is Steam EULA violated? @soft egret
If he's removing PBO's from the official version, then it's a modification (in the legal sense)
According to the Steam Subscriber Agreement it’s prohibited.
Well for example, I've had some of my open source work relicensed, where people take it and remove a module, and republish. I've spoken to lawyers, and it's legal.
Ahh contributions
Thought it was based on modifications
Also, the SSA is very specific.
In particular, with respect to Workshop Contributions, you represent and warrant that the Workshop Contribution was originally created by you (or, with respect to a Workshop Contribution to which others contributed besides you, by you and the other contributors, and in such case that you have the right to submit such Workshop Contribution on behalf of those other contributors).
"contributed besides you" if you didn't contribute something, that doesn't apply
removing something is not really a contribution
that's pretty subjective
For example, it’s typically legal to smoke in public, but not in say a shopping centre. The same with Steam. As it’s their platform, there are additional restrictions.
https://dictionary.cambridge.org/de/worterbuch/englisch/contribute
to give something
to add new plans or ideas, or help make improvements to something so that it becomes more valuable or successful
or help make improvements to something
And even if it was contribution, would still need permission to upload on behalf of all other contributors.
It's GPL. Meaning his "modification" needs to be open source too.
You MAY NOT aka PROHIBITED upload /re-upload something you have not wholly created or contributed as part of a team on (and in such case where you have permission from each contributor) .
So, as an example, it is PROHIBITED to upload open source content.
Steam’s platform, Steam’s rules.
If it’s not allowed as it’s clearly been stated here 100x , why are arma’s Mod creators allowed to violate Steams subscribers agreement by giving permission to something they can’t give permission to in the first place. - context, more for a better understanding not to be confrontational
Authors cannot give you permission to upload their work to Steam. They can tell you that they won't personally report your reupload, but you'll still be violating 6D unless you meet the specified criteria. Permission from an author does not supersede the Steam EULA
He's at it again lads (Anzus - frank)
https://imgur.com/a/iexhS9Y
oh my bad, couldn't remember him having a "store" for it all though
does still say in the post he's whitelisted for monetization as well, which he's not
Okey nope
the videos were uploaded a week ago. And they switched to that new terrain with accompaning steam workshop reuploads of common mods.
Also added new stolen vehicles. And added new "donator" skins that you can buy even though they are using a dozen mods that don't allow monetization, and they don't have permission by bohemia either.
I've heard he's also DMing people on discord on an alt offering to sell a list of scripts which i'm pretty sure other people have made, nothing's really changed then it seems
Question,
So as far as I'm aware the current fallujah on Steam workshop(the most updated one). Is only uploaded thanks to permission from the previous author. If I was to ask permission to use on a monetized. Who would I actually need to talk to? The uploader or the original Arthur?
Or would I need both, since I'm using the uploaders file to host?
@spare osprey why are arma’s Mod creators allowed to violate Steams subscribers agreement by giving permission to something they can’t give permission to in the first place. They aren't, that's why legal action can be taken against them by the Authors.
@prisma scaffold There are a couple of factors at play here. If the Uploader was not a contributer to the terrain, they technically aren't authorised by Steam to upload it. The best course of action would be to gain permission from both and receive written permission (A forum post from the original authors helps as well). The problem you will face from "someone else" uploading it is that one day, your monetised terrain may just one day disappear of the Steam Workshop.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1321654693
HAFM, NiArms, Massi, R3F, HAFM, RH Pistols, SFP Wheelchair, EWK_Cigs (not allowed to be used on any life servers)
yawns

Two guys join TFAR discord and immediately leave again.
I'm thinking "huh.. That's weird, what's up with that"
I click on them and see that they are on Arma discord too. And have their steam accounts connected. And they both have multiple multi gigabyte big "modpack" uploads on the workshop
Well... You guys just stepped into my honeypot.
Remember that guys, if you join TFAR discord with a connected steam account. Your risk of getting caught with your illegal reuploads increases 100x
Now i get it 😄

Okey @flint topaz @dark finch
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1562726179
VSM, TFA (Original: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=313027040), Tactical Hand Signals (http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=28179)
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1429595471
VSM, TFA, Spartan mk14 EBS (Original: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=934001894)
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1480210123
VSM, TFA, COS (Original: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=846603147)
You might want to fix all those illegal reuploads guys..
Thanks! That was quick.
Quick survey question. Why did you upload them, and did you know that it's not allowed?
If there was a message box popup before uploading a mod with Publisher that told you that you cannot upload anything that you didn't make by yourself, would that have stopped you?
no actually didnt! we decided to make an modpack for our unit. i got handed a few mods! which was requested by our rembers.
not that i remember.
i was told we needed unique keys tho.
Cool so you didn't know. So a message popup telling you about it would have prevented it?
Thats very useful info, don't get to talk to people who reupload stuff that often. As they are usually not as nice as you ^^
Btw you can use collections to make modpacks. That's not violating any rules and just as easy.
alright! thanks! mod stuff is fairly new to me so im still trying to get a grasp of things 😃
Our bad ❤ No harm intended and not aiming to theft anyone. Yeah we are having some issues with new members hence the TFAR pop-in as wanted to see why the site was down.
It was in an attempt to get the server secure as all the mods did not have signs and it was requested as Sabel mention. Found this for the mission ini though (
endMission "END2";};``` )
and we are busy reworking this for the new year. As Sabel said, we are new to this.
That code just means anyone attempting to run the mission with a mod that removes weapon sway gets sent back to the lobby and has no chance to join the mission with said mod
If mods are missing signatures, ask the author to add them
^ SOme authors abandoned or never respond. Hence the code. Literally have one running for from no say to SSPCM. Coming in with no arma "hard" knowledge so was basically just youtube tuts and reddit posts and quite a few from here.
it's also possible to make a "meta" mod with the rest as dependencies, the arma launcher will actually figure it out all dependencies by doing that if the first sent mod info is your meta mod
@keen trout Will you mind explaining that to me in help please? As that is new language to me
make dummy mod with some silly thing like a cfgpatches or whatever, upload to steam, add rest of mods as dependencies
if you try to join a server with that mod using the launcher, it will ask if you want to add the rest of the missing dependencies as well
@mint edge
is this really your version of winter cherno?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B2N3fuQuEfU&t=
Hello everyone, DayZ Winter mod: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1597140327 Thanks for watching this video, I'd like to thank the peop...
yea why
nvm... i didn't check who's account it was
Video showcasing the mod by 3RNO
this part of the description got me misleading and that this looks very like the new CUP winter cherno 😄
yea but there is literally nothing related to arma 2 in dayz
no more old foliage
dont know what i could even nick
xd
no worries, i could have figured if i had read who uploaded it :D
since it is not all that complicated to port stuff from A3 to DayZ and saw this, i made me wonder
o
well dayz chernarus is infinitely better then arma 2 chernarus
anyone thinking of porting it is an ape
with no brain
i was thinking of the new CUP winter chernarus, not the old A2 stuff
it's not really a2 anymore since we rebuilt the maps with source data and got new vegetation/texturing
but yes, object count is "still" a2
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1381434988
Only Authorized Personnel May Use This Modification Pack. Yeah.. True. But even the uploader of the pack is not authorized to use it 😄 What a joke.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1381433628
Enhanced Movement, Massi weapons, Shacktac stuff, VSM, FHQ, NiArms, ASR AI, cTab, RH Pistols, Achilles, Ares
Is this supposed to be some kind of joke?
@neon garnet that's your group. WTF do you think you are doing?
Not only are you just reuploading my stuff without asking, violating the Steam Subscriber Agreement AND! the rules concerning workshop uploads on the TFAR website. No. You are also putting your own logo onto my stuff. WTF
WOW. And you are even copy pasting my changelogs into your reupload.
tbh
it's kinda weird how armaholic seems to reupload mods
two of my group's mods were reuploaded without consent and since the descriptions are ripped from the workshop, the armaholic pages have "please don't reupload this anywhere else, the only valid download is on steam"
i asked them to take one down (when we had released only one mod then) and theyre like "lmao sorry we get our stuff from playwithsix, u gotta ask them to stop reuploading, we can unlist it from here and thats it"
that was a while ago but i was like 
idc abt it now tbh, but we released a third mod with the same "please don't reupload this anywhere" and if that gets reuploaded to armaholic without us having a say, THEN i'm gonna be mildly upset
like our mod descriptions ALWAYS include "the only legitimate download is here on the steam workshop, any other websites or reuploads are unsupported and may not work" and even that somehow ended up on the armaholic pages
and it's like
?????????
i get that someone couldve reuploaded the mods on their own accord, but the admin of the site told me they had been automatically reuploaded to another website, and then automatically listed on armaholic, it just seems super shady
I think Dayz SA map is WAYYYY too military. It's like the whole country is one massive military base.
@glass yacht understandable
this has been an issue for some time now and has made for some controversy
so they play the blame game? PlaywithSix is dead for about year IIRC
@carmine folio you sure you're in the right channel?
@faint nacelle not even sure I'm in the right discord server hahaha
🙈
@glass yacht WithSix does the exact same crap. When they shut down they just pushed all their mods to moddb without permission
Armaholic also has a terms of service which contradict quite a lot of the licenses for the things they upload, they are adding terms or taking away rights granted by the authors: http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=39
yeah it's just. super shady and wrong
me and a random lawyer firm that has no idea what's going on: Armaholic Pull Up Den
just hint at legal action if they don't cease their actions I guess
"We get it from PW6" doesn't hold up in a real court 😛
yea lmao
it's even an incredibly weak excuse outside a court room but alas
copying a bad practice from someone else doesn't make that practice any better @armaholic
i stg if they reupload another mod of mine ill be upset cause like
PW6 is gone so wyd lmao
it's been dead for like a year so any upload since then was quite illegal I believe
Well still they even contradict their own disclaimer by doing so (and all the other licenses and right of the creators): http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=11746
If you find any such files we ask you kindly to contact us about it so we can take the appropriate steps.```
i mean i told them to take this down like 3 times now http://www.armaholic.com/page.php?id=33315
but they ignore me 😄
Why am I not suprised.
why hasnt Armaholic been black listed and their staff banned from the forums? the amount of violations they have done would have resulted in others being banned at least 3 times
Cuz they have been there a long time and are big, thus have the priviledge to get ignored when they grossly violate IP
They definitively don't remove even after they have agreed to. It is going to require legal action to get armaholic to comply with IP rights.
@merry kestrel @soft egret Because I've not seen any such reports.
If a mod creator has had their mod uploaded to Armaholic without consent and their mod licence prohibits the same, they need to file a report. The same applies to Armaholic not removing mods within a reasonable amount of time.
Audit trail
@soft egret
how you know I'm a dude? might be a dudette
you could be an apache attack helicopter for all i care, you will still be called dude
@soft egret but your nick literary says ”men” 
women also says men
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1552185750
Citylife @astral marlin , NiArms, RH weapons, MBG killhouses/buildings, Kickass, Jbad, TRYK
Bisigns say @unreal vortex ?
Yes. That's you. I'd recommend you remove that before I throw a DMCA at it
Oh and this: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1504282904 too
@fossil basalt ^
DMCA it is then
Well, @unreal vortex at the very least you've earned yourself a ban.
He's in the PsiSyndicate and ALRP Steam group. What a coincidence
And he's friends with Repentz XD
Really can't make this stuff up 🤣
Nope. He was here. We were talking with him
He was just banned and his messages were deleted
No. He got banned for violating #rules on multiple accounts within just a single minute
Better than thieves and scammers? yeah.. kinda
@scarlet glade I would tread lightly.
IP rights violations will earn an insta ban > 90% of the time.
Thievery is not tolerated.
Well.. Most of the mods he has in there already had signatures. He could've just used them
hacked pbos
Discussions about copy protection or copying, backing-up, hacking, cracking or reverse engineering of any of BI's products or the products of any other developer is not allowed. Any links pertaining to cheating/hacking our games or servers should be sent to BohemiaBeck.```
Signing work he did not get permission to even use is not good and its funny how people who steal content love to play the OO I did not know. If you don't have permission directly or have created the content don't use it. It's not rocket science
You might have missed that. He wasn't playing the "I did not know". He was going the "don't f**king ping me again you ***" way.
Normal attitude of money grab community's steal all you can and run for the hills
Don't steal then
21 and a few
Taking someone elses stuff. Putting your name onto it. And redistributing it is no stealing?..
Aww. Okey
(To answer that question: It IS stealing.)
Some men you just can't reach. So you get what we had here last week, which is the way he wants it. Well, he gets it. I don't like it any more than you men.
Taking content with out permission todo so is stealing no matter how you got the content if you don't have permission from the original IP holder your taking without permission and that's stealing
Dmca filed for the cl content thanks for the heads up @soft egret
He sent me a friend request, and he already messaged me half a year back wanting personal help with his database on his life server.
Let's see where this goes 😄
in the past 2 hours were u surfing steam profiles to check for stolen stuff?
No. Someone else found it while he was looking through violations of his own stuff. And then sent it to me
which guy? can i have a name? i just wanna know so next time i wont take his stuff
You didn't take his stuff you took my stuff and stuff of my friends
what did u make lol
lul bye
As expected
I don't see why you expected any less.
I tried to friend someone on steam to ask them to remove stuff of mine... He seems to have anticipated by question and blocked me. Anyone had to deal with this guy before?
Link to "your stuff" and that which has been uploaded?
https://steamcommunity.com/id/ghostsgaming/myworkshopfiles doesn't seem to have any objects anymore
https://sharproleplay.enjin.com/mobile/forum/viewthread/m/42708609/id/32424017-server-info
Another community stealing A3PL’s content, when will they learn it won’t work 🤭
"yeah we have a dozen A3PL pbo's. But I assure you were are not just a cheap A3PL copy!"
"Also we are very intellgent. Which is why we have ASDG JR twice. And we also have TFAR 1.0 AND TFAR 0.9 at the same time. Because we are so profffusunal"
They even copied the A3PL mod installation guide. Going so far as to show a screenshot with @A3PL
They even copied every single word of our rules, regulations and all
And they are monetizing without approval 😄
Interesting how their server only went live a few days ago. But already have donations from July.
BI is informed (Techniker ist Informiert)
@brisk ember its 2 helmets and a vest that I gave to a mod back before workshop and that now I am trying to have removed since the author who assembled it all "gave" everyone permission to upload them.
A guy sent me a friend request on Steam. Let's take a look
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1599134800
complete JSRS reupload
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1599157996
TFAR reupload. But nice that he gives credits to Dedman Miller's work whoever that "Dedman" guy might be 🤔
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1599457232
Firewills jets, @lofty steeple 's FA-18
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1599490051
VSM, TFA and some other mods that I don't know. Who takes care of VSM reuploads again?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1599503498
sfp.. And TONS of SFP stuff. @sonic blade , cTab, Enhanced Movement, kka3_tfar_animations @stoic beacon, GRAD Trenches, TFW Ilbe radio, Zade backpack on chest, UK3CB_BAF Jackal @sweet minnow
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1600820518
Betekov, Dingor, Lingor, Isladuala, Esseker, Clafghan, Ruha, Anizay, Abramia, Bornholm, Mondkalbs buildings, Fallujah, Rosche, Panthera, Kerama
@latent mesa @last gorge @royal gulch
Those are all of his 6 total workshop uploads. 100% stolen content.
@soft egret dead man miller? Sounds like a threat to me
I personally don't care, rosche is APL-SA. They can reupload it all they want.
someone tell that guy that links or screenshots or any actual proof besides literally 4 letters would help
Actually yeah. Please someone post under that if he can show any proof. Useless otherwise. Don't have access to my BIF account right now (would either have to login or walk 3m.. ugh)
@oblique mauve is the owner of GADD, and I’m certain he isn’t doing shady stuff like that, but I’m sure once he wakes up he’ll be happy to respond.
FAQ also says donations don't get anything in return
I'll just wait for that guy to show some actual proof
Good call.
Hello
I will show you my code for my custom loadouts in Exile.
It’s actually @strong jasper’s admin loadout script.
I use it so that my clan members spawn with different gear than regular players. Sort of a perk for being in GADD. No money is involved in becoming a clan member, the application can be found on my website to fill in, it goes to discord where we vote on it as a staff team and then you get accepted. Most of the clan don’t donate, those that do, don’t get anything. I am very strict on the fact we do not give anything for money, if you search the word “donate” in my discord, you will actually see me replying to people that ask “what do I get for donating”... “nothing” and they then say “okay” and don’t donate 😂
@ me if you have questions, my job involves driving so I can’t reply on the post linked above until I am home later.
Monkey, just forget that guy. Probably just got killed in game, thinks he's the best, can't take it, lashing out. Not many of those around..... 😉
The burden of proof is on him.
Well I will provide all code needed if BI’s infringements team wish to see it. I’ve spoken to Jiri before because of the same shit. Salty players...
Libellous words from a former player.
@soft egret thanks, I'll take care of it once I'm home
Oh FYI, i have given my two cents. https://forums.bohemia.net/forums/topic/221103-gadd-monetizing-on-in-game-loadouts/?tab=comments#comment-3332032
Case closed. He deleted the post. Cheers.
users can't delete posts. HE didn't. Dunno why a moderator would?
Could've asked a mod to delete, no?
oh damn, cheers @soft egret for the tip on the TFA reupload
@oblique mauve @oblique mauve The thread was hidden while its being looked into. (no posts were deleted)
Great.
Trust, but verify @oblique mauve
I'm all fine with protocol and procedures. It irritates me when good people get thrown under the bus for things they haven't done.
Nobody got thrown under the bus yet. ? 🤔
Unless your servers' BattlEye is disabled, you've not been thrown under the bus
Patience
At the very least i can see the majority of the people here still looking with doubt to the guy with his post about your so called "breach of TOS"
seems someone has been naughty and taken massi's stuff and some other peoples stuff and put in a modpack without asking permission, also no credits given anywhere, https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1613078147
(no index for it yet) @river spear
im letting it run now
thx
@dull moon should be in now
🤘
It's no violation, but I was wondering what license do most people use for their mods?
I've been doing a fair bit of digging and one that kept me wondering is that RHS is using Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International but last I checked that wasn't really recommended for software.
I might be mixing it up with another variant perhaps?
ACE3 went for GPL V2, TFAR chose APL-SA. Anyone that has any experience want to discuss or guide me, I would mostly appreciate it.
- question:
what do you want to have covered? what do you want to achieve / prevent with the license
I avoided that really. I think my ideal scenario for the content I would be producing would be CC4.0, but it also includes software, which guided me into GPL 3.0.
I mostly want to avoid someone would take the content and make money off it. That's all.
so basically APL without monetization?
Yeah I guess, I haven't read up on APL to be honest.
we have a modified and BI approved APL-SA license for CUP, also for everybody who want can use it for his/her mod
http://cup-arma3.org/license
I do have it in front of me though, reading atm
feel free to read and maybe even use it
Oh ok cheers! But why all the differences between 4 big and common mods?
¯_(ツ)_/¯
Like it's literally 1 for each 😄
the main thing we modified the APL-SA is, because it does not cover the monetization as we want it to be covered
Because one mod may be cool with alterations and uploads while the other isn't
but other than that it is the same as TFAR uses, plus the no-monetization addition
There's really no reason for different/tailored licenses not to exist
unless you're cool with them all going Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International?
"you can use but not touch"
Well, first off I understand the need for tailored licenses, but I am really just trying to wrap my head around this.
Licenses are complex and mods per definition grey areas therein.
Say I have a mod and it's not open source, which license would I choose?
If someone cares to elaborate on some finer details on why certain mods chose certain paths that would probably help me.
PM me if you don't want to cause any discord drama.
I thank you 🙏
Did not know that existed.
I was kinda looking at more general licenses outside of the A3 ones. but I guess this is a start for A3 related mods. Thanks
I needed google image search to find it 😄
Ok at least I can figure out which license to stick on what mod. Still it intrigues me...
I thought "I'll just google other A3 mods to figure out what... wait waht"
that wasn't really recommended for software. A mod is not really software?
It's same kind of software as an image or a piece of musik.. Which people usually don't call software
@dull moon the main thing we modified the APL-SA is, because it does not cover the monetization as we want it to be covered It does. APL-SA is non commercial. Aka no monetization
but other than that it is the same as TFAR uses, plus the no-monetization addition TFAR is APL-SA, and that does indeed include no-monetization.
https://www.bohemia.net/community/licenses/arma-public-license-share-alike like.. Did you read the license? The first 4 bullet points. And the logo also contains the non commercial part
iirc the APL-SA was not covering that when we made CUP-L
and there was also no APL-ND back then
Yeah I assumed it had to be a little outdated considering the exception for Withsix ✝
And the APL licenses state that the content be used for A3 only, is it correct to assume that as the content creator I can still reuse the same content in say Ark mods? Just an example.
Assume no use of A3Tools during the process.
you are the rights owner
you can change the license, or give exceptions to people
Like I can still allow people to monetize TFAR even though the license forbids it
yep
Now to label everything correctly. Thanks for your input.
What about it
Question, if a mod has a APL and you make a durative of it, can you add your own license on top of the orginal, to your durative ? Like requiring durative of your version to be open source or something like that?
no
That's why it says "share alike"
you can make some slight changes. Such that it is still "alike"
but you cannot just put a different license onto it
you might be able to add more restrictions.. maybe (probably also limited in some ways), but you cannot remove restrictions.
I haven't yet seen a mod released as APL. I've only seen APL-SA so far
But for example APL is still non commercial. You cannot make a derivative just changing a line in a config somewhere. And then allow people to monetize your "derivative"
@soft egret actually, that "change a line in there somewhere" topic is something I was curious about. I modified ACE (which is allowed) to hardcode some settings in (rather than allow players to change them and fuck with mission). Only ~40 lines of the thousands are modified. Whats the SteamWorkshop policy on uploading something like that for personal use? (It's fine by ACE).
That would fall under the "you contributed" I'd say
where steam requires you to have permission by all other contributors
Steam is not clear whether the license the code was released under matter
besides one pbo everything is GPL. So.. Does that mean the contributors agreed to steam workshop uploads? They agreed to have their code be freely shared.. But does that apply to Steam too?
Only one of Steams lawyers can answer you that, but the subscriber agreement itself, doesn't mention that. It says permission by each of the other contributors.
So I'd assume that to be specific to you, and specific to that upload
I consulted my own lawyer (my girlfriend 😂) and she thinks it's kosher, but I was kinda wanting to gauge public opinion as well I suppose
Steam doesn't talk about "permission to distribute on workshop"
They say "permission to distribute on all other contributors behalf" which is a little different
You have the first one, GPL allows you to distribute wherever you want. But the second... Dunno. Am not a lawyer.
GPL does require you to have all your modifications open source tho
it does actually talk about rights to distribution. Steam requires you to waive their liability so they can send your content thru their distribution network. its buried somewhere in the EULA.
Section 6. A.
yeah but I meant 6D which says "on their behalf"
And to me "on their behalf" means "in their name"
And "distribute wherever you want" is different than "distribute under my name wherever you want"
its just a liability thing, steam takes zero when you use their platform for legal reasons obv.
really invasive, especially the wording.
@prisma scaffold IANAL, but if your work is truly derivative, then yes, the derivative material can be disclaimed from the parent material and licensed separately. If your work is merely adaptive, then it is still bound to the terms of the original license. Now that's not to say that the original license may not have a provision for re-licensing adaptive materials.
@royal charm I have to ask why you dont just use force force in the server cba settings...🤔
I believe logged in admins can still change those settings.
no, can't edit settings forced through file. Because saving them would have to edit the file, which Arma can't
I assume we are talking about the CBA_Settings file, the one that has a bunch of entries like
force force ace_advanced_fatigue_enabled = true;
If so, yes mission settings can be overwritten by logged in admins.
He talked about a config addon. So I assume he's talking about an addon when he says addon. Not a mission
I read "rather than allow players to change them and fuck with mission" and assumed he is uploading a mission, with his modified ACE as a dependency, and doesn't want server admins to be able to change settings, and thought Snake suggested editing the CBA_Settings.sqf file.
@gentle compass No Derivative means No Derivative.
No Derivatives - If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you may not distribute the modified material.
Well that's what the license says yes, but that's not necessarily what the law is. Copyright is very very complex and there's a reason why IP lawyers are the highest earning specialization of lawyers.
Ultimately though I will agree, don't derive from something covered by an -ND license unless you've consulted a lawyer.
And even then, prepare to be banned from Arma.
..A person who has committed a crime can often be found not guilty, but it does not change the fact that the act was committed. Here, the intent is quite explicit. NO Derivatives.
@manic narwhal Well, partially because it's fun to modify the actual code, and partially because I didn't realize force force existed
"use the force, harry..."
_ - gandalf_
@manic narwhal I suppose the other reason would be that, this version wouldn't automatically update right before missions 🤣
@mental edge we use CC license because:
a. we always have
b. my lawyer suggested we stick with a license that is renowned rather then arma specific
c. apl-sa wasn’t redacted at the moment of our first rhs for a3 release
Speak of the devil
Mr Pu*"Let's always release our updates every Sunday afternoon because we know about Hawkin's operations"*Fu
@echo orchid 😆
what?
Was using Steam Workshop for one of our public servers, with big public events every Sunday night - RHS has had a tendency to post their updates a few hours before that time window pretty consistently 😃
I so so so so wish workshop had version control
lol man, we have released updates in every single day of the week, the result was the same - someone bitched about his gamenight going tits up
the current stance is - the updates will always be released when it is convenient for the developer, with zero regard to when it might be convenient for the user
so yes, it is most likely that future updates will also happen in the weekends from now on, because that is when it is most convenient for most of us working class people to get together from 4 continents
@royal charm ^
haha I'm not faulting you for it, it's not an issue with you guys. It's just more an issue with Steam Workshop forcing updates upon players
obviously no matter when you release something, there'll be someones event that it interrupts - but I'd rather be interrupted than never recieve updates! 😆
to be honest you don't even need version control
just an option to manually download updates
That would also be lovely hehe
but that doesn't mean some blokes wouldn't complain because they don't know how or they forgot to tick/untick that option
in any case, we are going OT here
A late thanks to @echo orchid for the response above and everyone here that participated in the license-matter. Truly helpful and loved reading up.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1371368117
NiArms, USAF AC130, UK3CB Weapons,vehicles,units, Firewill Jets.
@sweet minnow @queen wing
Uploader @gilded inlet
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=969966899
Same guy
ALiVE, Firewill's jets, NiArms, 3CB Units,Weapons,vehicles
They got attention because they posted a "speak with people instead of just filing a DMCA" thread in a german Arma forum where they wanted mod authors to speak to people instead of just taking their stuff down. They said everyone is free to upload anything to steam workshop because steam explicitly allows that. And additionally if they provide credits, that means everything is fine.
So i thought.. Let's look at their steam uploads.. Wasn't suprised
but Steam doesn't explicitly allow that...
exactly..
Firewill Jets - uploaded to Steam Workshop and it is allowed since there is Steam Subscriber Agreement 6 B (a) and of course 6 D.
NiArms is licensed with Arma Public Share-Alike (APL-SA), so it is useable.
3CB Units is released under CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 - allowed to reupload```
(it's a response on the SW item)
Any wisdom you can throw at him? @fossil basalt 😄
D. Representations and Warranties
You represent and warrant to us that you have sufficient rights in all User Generated Content to grant Valve and other affected parties the licenses described under A. and B. above or in any license terms specific to the applicable Workshop-Enabled App or Workshop page. This includes, without limitation, any kind of intellectual property rights or other proprietary or personal rights affected by or included in the User Generated Content. In particular, with respect to Workshop Contributions, you represent and warrant that the Workshop Contribution was originally created by you (or, with respect to a Workshop Contribution to which others contributed besides you, by you and the other contributors, and in such case that you have the right to submit such Workshop Contribution on behalf of those other contributors).
You furthermore represent and warrant that the User Generated Content, your submission of that Content, and your granting of rights in that Content does not violate any applicable contract, law or regulation.
Section 6D
No authorisation no upload
There was rksl stuff in there too btw. Dunno what that really is though
it had uk3cb prefix I think
It will be the Attachments
Don't understand how one can be so stupid as to point directly to the section of the subscriber agreement that forbids reuploads, and then say that this section allows reuploads 🤔
Their own interpretation or only reading half of it I guess
@soft egret
what forum?
armaworld
got a link to the posts?
Can't you search yourself. You lazy lutz https://armaworld.de/index.php?thread/4240-sprechen-statt-dmca
i'm german. it's more efficient to ask dedmen, thyn searching myself 😄
Btw.. Not that it has anything really to do with this, I just find this funny. He has his own Life Framework.
Another stubborn reuploader that wants to missunderstand all rules and doesn't care about IP rights, and he happens to be in the life scene.
He has been removed.
Now just have to wait till his reuploads disappear
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1463062730 has hlc cup tfr rh and probably more
Life.... What else is new
Would it be helpful to have a tool to list the files of a workshop file and then be able to pick specifc files to download rather than the whole mod?
The benefit being the server with a gigabit connection downloads the whole mod, keeps it available for a few hours then deletes it, in this timespan you can download specific files you want to look at
Might be helpful to people with slower internet connections
As in making a mod pack on an individuals computer ? I think the biggest issue for us is the server not being able to display all the mods. But I’ve think I’ve fixed that issue with a dummy mod . Now I can control the mod pack on a weekly basis.
Oh no sorry I meant downloading for the purpose of checking on IP infringements
I think that would be great for people with metered connections as well
@burnt oak 👆
Woo!
question?
http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1437381631
http://prntscr.com/m3dm1c
EDIT : C.O.S Sakuraba V2 Containing VSM pbo
whats the question @flint topaz
Edit ^
well the orignal pack seems to be just a compilation of other peoples work
so its probably all unauthorized
Yeah not sure. But re-working the modpack that we use as we unknowingly made a mistake that Dedmen corrected us on. Started going through the loaded mods and looking what causes errors and noticed that. Personally I have no idea about who may do what. Just thought I'd note it.
seems like the comments report problems too.
3CB lads not taking down that upload Dedmen found?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=969966899
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1371368117
@fossil basalt who deals with EBO files? https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1199915594&searchtext=yamaha
Dwarden does
@wary tundra aren't you with 3CB?
yeah. He still is in here
@bright tartan
are you in any way related to the yamaha mod Rock just posted?
Yes that's him
EBO, no gud
@soft egret thanks for the heads up
@sweet minnow
You apparently don't even know under which licenses you publish your works. The worst thing is when the creators don't even understand the licenses they distribute. I can only laugh at you. I guess the want the hard way
Oh well
Wow.. That chat in there. The reuploader gave FM a "virtual house ban according to German law"
He banned FM for banning him 😄
He updated the item half an hour ago. Maybe he removed it in the same second as saying "fuck off! It's my right and you cannot do anything about it" and playing the big guy
Having a big mouth, but silently complying
What a coincidence. All these people in there that think they are lawyers... Are members of "Kampfgruppe Gram" 🤔
This is destilled essence of why I stopped public releases.
Just the fucking audacity.
"Oh you dont know your own license, so imma go and do what I want. sue me!"
This is why you can not take these german communities serious.
@dull moon not really, i was added to that workshop mod to overhaul it
but havent dont it yet cuz time
but it was one of my intensions to replace the ebo with pbo 😄
might want to make time for that
yea think i will do it this week 
@bright tartan
i'd set it to private asap
privates all workshop items
so, none managed to get a DMCA on that shitshow so far?
Does valve process them on the weekend?
Would guess not. But timezones vary. What is still weekend for you might be monday morning for for someone else.
DMCA get displayed a couple minutes after someone files one. 3CB asked them to remove it. So I guess they give them a grace period
Btw had some people (with gross lack of even the most basic of reading skills) arguing that you cannot DMCA for someone reuploading your stuff if your license allows redistribution, meaning you can only report for steam subscriber agreement violation but not file a DMCA.
Just wanna get this out of the way before more idiots try to jump on that wagon. The Subscriber Agreement section 6D that we like to cite so much actually tells you why you can't, we usually only cite the last sentence. But the first sentence says that by uploading you are giving Steam the right to create derivatives and use them and/or your original upload for promoting the Steam platform which is commercial use.
So by uploading to steam, you'd try to give Steam rights that you don't even own yourself.
So even if your license allows "free redistribution" if it doesn't also allow derivatives and commercial use, then uploading to Steam is a license breach, which means you loose the right to redistribute.
All APL licensed mods disallow commercial use, meaning reupload to steam not allowed in any way except by the original author (which is why steam added that section 6D that we cite so much)
Only the most free licenses like GPL or MIT would allow it. But you'd still be violating the Subscriber Agreement of course.
These "people" basically only read the short laymans terms overview page of the CC license saying that you are free to redistribute. And are trying to make that their motto, threatening to file counter claims to anyone DMCA'ing. I even saw them personally threatening a Arma Modder that was part of the Armaworld thread because he had a youtube downloader on his github. Just because he tried to explain them how stuff actually works.
Beware of such people, I won't tell you who I'm talking about, but I cannot prevent you from scrolling up.
The allow redistribution is in there to allow other units to host e.g. on armasync or armaholic etc. However as correctly identified it's Steam's own license terms, that any upoader must agree to before clicking, that assigns them full rights. Including to make derivatives. That's the kicker. We don't mind people hosting it. But not on Steam. Their excuse of max 30 mods is a poor one at best. If they spent some of that time researching how to host an arma's server rather than pseudo-law... It would help them
yeah, most license allow re-distribution, but once the hosting platform asks you to share IP rights with them, that is the moment you can't host because you do not own the IP right yourself
Then, DMCA or report to Steam?
i said it numerous times
or ask BI to make it incompatible 😛
DMCA is the way to go
asking anyone anything is pointless and waste of tim
e
it is NOT bi's job to take care of 3rd party licenses
Hm, question then; Isn't DMCA only valid if your own license prohibits it?
prohibits what?
the upload to steam
I'm not too sure when Valve wants you to file DMCA; when your license is violated or theirs?
every single license is violated unless it is open source
in short, one cannot upload to steam unless he is the owner of the files
that I understand, but can the (actual) author file a DMCA takedown request based on a violation of Steam TOS?
that was the only confusion
When you upload your content to Steam to make it available to other users and/or to Valve, you grant Valve and its affiliates the worldwide, non-exclusive, right to use, reproduce, modify, create derivative works from, distribute, transmit, transcode, translate, broadcast, and otherwise communicate, and publicly display and publicly perform, your User Generated Content, and derivative works of your User Generated Content, for the purpose of the operation, distribution and promotion of the Steam service, Steam games or other Steam offerings. This license is granted to Valve as the content is uploaded on Steam for the entire duration of the intellectual property rights. It may be terminated if Valve is in breach of the license and has not cured such breach within fourteen (14) days from receiving notice from you sent to the attention of the Valve Legal Department at the applicable Valve address noted on this Privacy Policy page. The termination of said license does not affect the rights of any sub-licensees pursuant to any sub-license granted by Valve prior to termination of the license. Valve is the sole owner of the derivative works created by Valve from your Content, and is therefore entitled to grant licenses on these derivative works. If you use Valve cloud storage, you grant us a license to store your information as part of that service. Valve may place limits on the amount of storage you may use.
sec
I know the passage, but can 3CB file a DMCA based only on Steam TOS violation, while their own license doesn't strictly prohibit uploading to Steam?
There is NO shared copyright outside the mod team. http://www.rhsmods.org/team
This upload is in direct violation with Steam Workshop Agreement (section 2 and section 6) and RHS End User Agreement - http://www.rhsmods.org/page/EULA```
if you read all CC ND licenses
it allows redistributions
of course anyone (including 3CB) can file a DMCA for breaking BOTH Subscriber Agreement (TOS) and their own license
but their own license isn't violated with the CCND, or am I seeing that incorrectly?
their Intellectual Property rights is violated, which is legally worse
Okay, that I needed to know. Thanks 😄
in fact DMCA is about IP rights rather than license files anyways
Then I do wonder why DMCA isn't out (yet)
to be honest, i could easily file a DMCA based on RHS ND license anyways