#ip_rights_violations
1 messages Β· Page 48 of 1
He deleted the comment now π
Expected him to answer here: https://www.reddit.com/r/arma/comments/9wb86a/arma_3_cyrus_93mm_marksman_rifle_remade_for/e9lyhnc/
But it's here: https://www.reddit.com/r/arma/comments/9wb86a/arma_3_cyrus_93mm_marksman_rifle_remade_for/e9m08ml/?context=8&depth=9
Wow
not on my end
deepest is https://www.reddit.com/r/arma/comments/9wb86a/arma_3_cyrus_93mm_marksman_rifle_remade_for/e9m08ml/ @soft egret π
he did CSAT gear too apparently: https://www.reddit.com/r/arma/comments/9wmyk0/its_arma_oh_wait/
seems like a nice fella
he also has a nice thread from a few days ago titled "I'm modeling the Zafir 7.62 from scratch since Bohemia is kind of a dick regarding asset usage"
Prove it's falsified with legally valid methodology (in other words, your proof has to hold up in court) or hold your tongue. I have the email in my inbox, that's all the proof I need.
Its almost like he forget who would also have a copy of the email π
@soft egret
i was comparing all hashes of ALDP, AiATP, CUP and australia
only the hashes of CUP and Australia match
pointless to waste time https://www.reddit.com/r/arma/comments/9wb86a/arma_3_cyrus_93mm_marksman_rifle_remade_for/e9m2jh7/
read his reply before mine
this case looks like the birth of a new meme
i gotta to love his proof video haha https://youtu.be/382ItK5Sr90?t=20
email date, nov 13, 6:27 am ... yep, so true ... considering he made the post 1 day ago on reddit
so the approval (he claims to have from time before he made stuff) is received after he published about the stuff ... logic ftw 
6:27AM? The one from his screenshot was 8:38AM
he runs generator for this fake stuff π
Doesn't seem fake. He has Google+ friends on that ccount. Seems to be his real account
you're right, active account.
if you look at this
https://youtu.be/382ItK5Sr90?t=13
you will see this
never shit where you eat, never use your real account for fraud
And both dates are several hours after he made the reddit post and after he was done making his model
But in screen is something like Sincerely looks wierd
Like it got this word sppace under and then guy
And in other its in 1 line
First:
Hello, <blanked>
Thank you
Second:
Hello Tiger,
Thank you
The , after hello is missing. And the empty line too. Also he blanked a much bigger space than he would've needed for "Tiger"
And at the bottom
Sincerely, newline.
and second mail has Sincerely, name
Also in the picture he took 12 hours ago, the mail was 9 hours old. So 21 hours old right now.
In the video he JUST MADE the mail is 4 hours old.
Like cmon.. It's not so hard to atleast go through with the fake and lying. But these pure amateur screw ups.. Man.
He could've done a much better job, he doesn't even try
He is legit he knows how to travel in time he is working in BI and he asked himself for permission
Problem solved
Sarcasm
don't forget he asked himself in the future for the permission outside the workhours too π€£
He will even Dmca himself and take it to court
His story changed again
Says someone from BIS gave him permission without telling anyone else π
Yea you can change story if you can travel in time and do such magic
Dont think he cares about staying anonymous since he has videos of himself and his street on his youtube
Or he didn't even think it through that far
His reddit account is only just about over a week old. Not hard to delete it again π
Yea and try that in next few months after eveybody forgets
Has he used the automatic response as his base fake email?
In my emails the only one with the line in the centre was the automatic response
i call the new meme:
#but_BI_gave_me_permission
post it π
Pleeeease dwarden i wana see him scared
Just joke with sending case to court
Or something
joke? π
I don't think empty threats are appreciated
i really wanted to troll him bit but my colleagues have no such sense of humor
With full force, that's the way to go on him. For real...
Well at least you can mention BIS can take the case to court
The plot thickens
All BI has to do is show that such email was never sent from their domain by an employee right?
how do you show that you didn't send an email? π
doesn't the email server keep track of that stuff?
how else you gonna prove that the email was a forgery
not sure a date mismatch says 100% forgery
Idunno
Presumably, assuming he modified another email received from BI they can show the original BI-RT #193254
In court he would have to proove that the mail is legit. Which he can not.
How would one go about proving the email is legit (or not)? Won't he just use his "edited" email as evidence?
in the video it shows @carmine foliohemia.net on the imgur link bisstudios.com π€
pffffffffffft π "I will show the judge my email, which is legit"
too bad some researchers will actually take a very close look at it
Actually, looking at a previous support thread I submitted, aren't the BI-RT message subject lines just used for the automated response from support? In addition, would the sender from BI not be a person rather than the generic support ID, e.g. "person name via RT" That's what I see in previous support threads. Finally the sincerely seems to be the auto response. All email from real people at BI that I have seen have ended with ```Best regards,
Name
Department or Bohemia Interactive```
Now it's "I'll post it everywhere I can. No one can stop me". Well, the jail time resulting from the court case can π
Looking at the image of the email it seems like the sincerely is followed on the next line with "Bohemia Interactive" (if you look at where the characters are just visible above the blackout blob). That is an automated response mail, not a mail from an employee
does this count as admitting to having no permission? https://i.imgur.com/vngLt7b.png
what kind of automated response is that...
See this for an example of the automated response: https://imgur.com/5oItUaW
He basically edited an automatic response mail π¦
What a muppet!
can we get a post on Reddit with image of the real BI-RT <whatever code he used>?
Look at mine and see that he took the basic mail. Edited after the first sentence of the mail body and left the "One again... blah" line and the bottom
I know, but for the rest of the people in the thread to see
publicly expose his forged evidence
Can BI post that under the GDPR?
hmm
Feel free to post mine though - I'm not a reddit user
But you can now see how he just edited the automated response email from BI
I do, but I don't have to the real email to post for the public
but didn't he admit to it basically after this? https://i.imgur.com/vngLt7b.png
Only his mom can stop him when she turns off the wlan router xD
This is embarrassing.
This is probably why aliens avoid us.
No intelligent life.
:p
And you know what? I have tricks up my sleeve nobody else has ever thought of yet. You ever seen some ridiculous court case where the defendant gets away with some crazy shit? That's me. I've weaseled myself out of prison time before.
Wow. That's a very naiive 12 year old
decided to check out this channel thinking about the shitstorm that would be raging on, was not disappointed
in one of his videos "Am going to make a better model than Bohemia and make them pay for it ha" I cant even with this guy am losing brain cells
He's deleted his video from the Cyrus thread
sheesh why even feed a troll like that. just leave him to dwarden. he's basking in this drama, soaking it in through his sticky teen pores.
really pointless to contribute
oh and copy and pasted the same response in a lot of his posts, https://www.reddit.com/r/arma/comments/9wb86a/arma_3_cyrus_93mm_marksman_rifle_remade_for/e9l23z7/, over and over again in the thread.
That's the kind of person who really does need a court case as an example (has to be done some time, otherwise every bugger will think they can get away with it).
he's not a troll, he's a compulsively lying keyboard warrior
I am literally ROFL
Regardless of one or the other, taking legal action against someone would probably do BI some good.
He's so tragic that it's extremely humorous.
wow that guy is something else...
as I mentioned earlier, check his previous posts, he even admits that BI didn't allow him to edit weapons and use for other games
I hope BI will take this to court then he could be in "If I say I live in say, Wellington, Ohio, I might actually live in the next town over" depends if there is a prison
Lul the "ArmaWARcore" guy disputed my DMCA
Should i file one as well as he as some stuff from me uploaded as well?
go for it
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1554226760&searchtext= here this one
Would be good. Then maybe I don't need to argue with steam that much if they see DMCA's coming in from everywhere
@soft egret there's a video on his YouTube and from what I can tell - on a mobile screen - from his hand, this man is probably in his 20s. Which is probably fucking worse and even sadder lmao.
Either way hopefully he gets his ego checked and some legal action is thrown his way, maybe.
I applaud simply for the fact that you can tell his age by his hand 
Hands are as good an identifier as fingerprints... still that's off topic. Hope he gets taken down a level by someone in a position to.
:D
Well he has videos of himself and videos showing where he lives so don't expect to much out of this bright one
there's a a bunch of Fallout "Modders" who are fucking pissed at BI and RHS because they weren't allowed to use their assets
Is Fallout the new Garrys mod?
Yes
...and lets bring it back in on topic please.
I wonder what puny arguments they have to be pissed
erma gherd, I can't steal
Man...this guy 
any idea why my DMCA got removed?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1557080077
@pliant oar
no, Valve isn't sharing that info with us
Btw the reddit guy deleted all his comments. Kinda sad loosing that history.
Looking on the workshop start page today: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1561397295 HM. A 4GB Life pack.. What are the chances?
Yes! You're right! The chances are 100%
HAFM, EWK Cigs(not allowed to be used in "life" at all) and TFAR of course. π
@soft egret do you happen to know if those packs differ from each other at all or do they all upload the same stuff?
life packs in general?
Most of them differ. There are just some that are the exact same because people copy from eachother
yeah thats what I was wondering if they all use the same pack they buy or something xD
i should check for all my standalone mods and go to town on the workshop
but urgh...
compiling hundreds of dmca takedowns is not something im looking forward to
that's exactly what they hope for π
Yup, even had to argue with a reuploader and their point was "if the they're not filling DMCAs they dont care"
in 2077 a bot patrols the steam workshop and takes down unallowed uploads automatically
in 2078 there will be a master AI sending out armed skydrones to ip violators and reuploaders. if one drone get's in trouble, other drones will rush to aid since they are all connected. we will call it SKYNET
how... it... begins...
if that's how it happens, it should happen π
Screenshot from Repentz Stream: https://gyazo.com/9a9bbbc4ac5b4566942dc12c50d16736
Does anyone still have the slightest belief that he might actually make something legit this time around?
Sorry to smash your last straw of hope
Who has armored vehicles inside obfuscated PBO's besides 3CB? You guys should be aware of this stuff going on.
Repentz is currently working on the next psisyn.com server.
The titus mod maybe?
Oh it says "It's the armed escallade and the trackhawk" No idea what that's supposed to be
Escalade is a regular civilian car, not sure if it was Chevy.
So it's probably another life server they are stealing from
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DlBcXQk4CcA apparently this is the trackhawk? Repentz is trying to steal models from Shounka?
Isn't shounka's stuff stolen as well?
mostly yeah
life servers were a mistake 
Non-military RP was a mistake π
You only pop up when he's mentioned, kinda weird but you know
Youβre not the only one whoβs noticed it.
either him or his lover
That guy with the fallout ports of Arma stuff. All his youtube videos and uploads of his mod have been deleted. All his reddit comments are gone too.
So much to "you can't do anything to me, I have a lawyer"
Was it deleted or did he delete it himself?
Probably scared shitless because BI actually send out a message to him? :P
If he did actually get a lawyer then I suspect this was the first piece of advice he would have received - burn your alias you idiot!
showing your Gmail account with a Google+ account activated on it maybe wasn`t such a good idea after all..........
or just track down the receiver of the automated response
Oh well, someone may have forgotten to close the tabs where he posted a lot of the stuff on Reddit (before he deleted it) and decided to take screenshots. No biggy!
@real socket
https://twitter.com/Arma3official/status/1063438038104199170
the bloke is actually using DayZ SA content that is ripped and ported to ArmA. Not really sure it is cool to tweet that, all things considered...
π
This is even mentioned in the reddit post that Homesick commented on
good grief, it's a 2nd time when official twitter retweets screens of arma and ripped content
Sometimes I do think that the devs are so focused on other things that they are (unintentionally) oblivious to some of the drama unfolding in IP theft land.

π€
Eh. I mean, have any of them played BF4? They'd know as soon as they looked at the screen
Admittedly, it's probably too much effort to go into thesis-level of research on everything you want to retweet.
human mistake, most likely oblivious to the amount of stolen content is used as private mods
Everyone makes mistakes yeah. As long as it's taken down once someone informs the poster about it. It's fine
MISTAKES? Burn them at the stake. /s
i was actually talking about the person who re-tweeted that image
you cannot steal stuff by mistake
VSM included btw
Iβve not played any Battlefield game since BF 1942
you haven't lost a lot
I think itβs an honest error on Bohemiaβs part, but it does highlight the amount of stolen content out there.
@real socket , do press enter mate π
backpack looks way too sophisticated to appear by a random legit modder π
This is where a lock feature would be nice, to pause all convos until his reply is finished π
"Priority speaker" ?
Slow Mode with premium queue
make money where you can nightstalker, have enough money for that new arma life cash money server. /s
I ain't coming anywhere near A3 Life
Alright. I have answered this quite alot today. In a world where there is several hundreds, even thousands of modpacks that gives you gear, and alot of it looks the same it is quite hard for a normal person to know wether or not it is "stolen content" or not. We went through all the information we could find on the subject, prior to releasing the twitter post. It was posted by me, I made the post as it is the first of several posts that will be posted on a weekly basis. I do understand that most of you have concerns about modpacks in it being stolen content, and I will definitely look into it again when I'm back at the office. I do however take full responsibility for the post, and will look into it on monday.
Mistakes might have been made, but atleast we know what to look for in the future.
hehe let people here proof-read a tweet with gear screenshots π
100% stolen-content free then
he said "normal person", a lot here including and especially @soft egret do not fit in that bucket
pfft
I just assumed Dedmen was one of the coming sarcastic robot overlords
He's like an Anti-virus
Thank you for sharing your opinion with me though! Will be taken into consideration going forward π
cheers for the decent reply
Very welcome Rob.
Iβll speak to you tomorrow around 21:00ish π
Will do! π
Wait...what? VSM?
Afaik VSM had ripped stuff in their mod, they said they didn't know it was ripped.
If I'm wrong feel free to correct me
Nah, they knew. They even originally credited the the model ripping website where it explicitly stated the models were ripped from BF4... That's why VSM was banned in the end
VSM was caught red handed.
If only we could have a publisher thing that requires the uploader to have the biprivatekey or whatever that corresponds with the bikey to upload it.
RIP mods using multiple bikeys though
but a lot of those are "modpacks" afaik
Banned
ahh lol, the backpack on the left is ripped from RHS and edited as there are no radios attached to any version of it
I recognized the RHS backpack. But not the edit
so did i, but i someone else from RHS spotted it
Well I got an archive of RHS screenshots if BI ever needs to tweet 'em π but yeah, it's really really hard for someone to notice ripped content unless they are specifically looking for it, or have first hand knowledge from the real producers team.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1562675299&searchtext= reupload of Winter Chernarus
Nothing to do other than inform the creator
Actually, you could click the "REPORT" button and report it as being a re-upload. Be detailed and it will be marked incompatible.
(Hint: It looks like a flag)
weird question and also probably wrong channel but
how could I stop armaholic from automatically uploading my mods?
like I tried contacting the site admin n nothing happened lmao
@glass yacht Had the same happen with my mods, and they wouldn't take them down
yeah it's just. hmm
I never had any issues contacting them.
They answered pretty fast and removed my content / edited the download page.
Have you contacted Foxhound directly? Either on Armaholic or BI Forums
Isn't it a tad bit weird they already upload your stuff there without asking?
its common practice as far as I'm aware, they didnt ask me either if I'm alright with it
Yep. I've seen someone post his mod on BIF. with a big bold allcaps "It's not allowed to upload this to armaholic" note at the bottom. And right below that note is foxhounds post that his addon is now available on armaholic
Like.. You have to re-check that you are not actually in a episode of americas most retarded humans
I mean, isnt foxhound practically doing the same thing as what is being done on the Steam Workshop? upload first and ask permission later(or never in most cases on SW)?
atleast he says in the thread he has done so, but still
yeah
I am working on a mod, and I am worried that if I ever release on BIF, that it would be taken by others
I want to release it publically, but only on BIF at most
and consider a steam workshop later down the line
but I am still debating things in that regard
Others will 100% upload to workshop if your mod is any good
its really only retextures, that add factions
So the question is. Are you willing to release your mod, or will you put up with DMCA'ing everyone who reuploads it.
Or third choice, ignore everything that's going on
yea, it really only comes down to those options
unfortunately
Even if you dont want to upload it to the SW I would say upload it anyway but keep it set to private, should make takedowns of reuploads easier since you can easily show that you are the first that uploaded it (cause you're the creator).
My problem with DMCA is that you need a return address. I've had my phone number leak to some milsim units before, that was fun - I'd rather not leak anything else lmfao
So the option is to either:
- Pay for a PO Box
- Pay for a DMCA service that charges $100/DMCA
either way, money lost simply for protecting content.
You can sign DMCA's with an alias, but you can't sign without a real address, which is where most internet DMCA's fall through - not many people want to open themselves up to the harassment.
yeah tho like, armaholic automatically reuploading stuff is just super fishy tbh
i DID manage to contact them once and i did get one of my mods in like, control under my own account there
but i couldn't figure out at all how to update it or take it down so it's still up in an inferior state to the workshop version
meaning when i'm gonna upload my other mod that requires it, and it'll inevitably require my first mod
armaholic is gonna reupload the other mod, link to and say it's dependent on my first mod, as it should be, but the first mod won't have the assets necessary for the other mod to work, because the version on their site is outdated and i can't figure out at all how to update it
it's just confusing and like, something one shouldn't have to bother with
just armaholic reuploading stuff
plus the second time i tried contacting the site, no reply at all
when i did contact them tho, foxhound replied and he was kind of a jerk at first
like just totally passive aggressive
my first message was like "okay so hey i made this mod, i don't really like your website, since i prefer steam as a platform, here's a few reasons why i didn't upload it here to begin with. i don't wanna sound like im about to sue you or anything though"
Passive aggressive? you mean like me?
and then he's like "if you want us to unlist it from our site, that's fine. but if you want it to stop automatically being uploaded, talk to playwithsix. we get our stuff from there."
Yeah he was like that too when I last dealed with him. When that guy uploaded his mission replicating the las vegas shooting and foxhound didn't want to take it down cuz free speech
like he apologized for coming off in a rude way, and said it was cause a lot's going on, so it's understandable, but still!!
oh for gods sake
that's stupid
it's a damn video game, not some entire government
Plus that mission actually broke Arma EULA.
using free speech as an excuse, it doesn't bar you from someone having an opinion of you lmao
yeah i would imagine
ugh
armaholic is like such a needless headache for me
at this point i don't really care tbh, since by default any mod of mine uploaded there is just inferior
it's just that he thinks its totally alright to just reupload mods from the workshop
armaholic works when steam doesn't, that's the only upside i could think of, personally
and steam works 99% of the time in my experience
it also doesnt help that they are starting to lock certain things behind subsciption, like "Sort by Date"
making money with the mods they illegally uploaded. GG
thing is, technically you can still access the mods without an account or subscription, its just easier to find what you are looking for with a subscription
π‘ π‘ π‘ π‘
jfc
you pay for the convenience that literally every other modding website has
yup
i didn't know stuff like that was paywalled holy shit
man i'm just gonna add in the description to my next mod, like
"if u upload this to armaholic then u a stupid"
it's like doing π
but it's hidden and when you see it you're just like ugh
I wonder why steam can't split uploader / author like uploader: stealinshit321 author: Cup Team (link to website? Or steam account)
why would it need?
It doesn't. Nobody but the author is permitted to upload to the workshop.
I think I've found some ripped assets in a mod for another game.
Men Of War Assault Squad 1
and the Cold War mod
Right now me and a friend have a positive that old SLA Helmets were ripped and I'm also sure a few vehicles are ripped (The M1128 MGS and Mortar Carrier)
As well as the technical pickup
send the info into the email in the channel description and BI will take care of it
I will
@scenic nymph I think you are in need of one of my awesome analogies.
There are serial killers that have been killing for years and are still not in prison. That means it's fine and totally not illegal that they kill people right? because if it would be, they'd be in prison right now. Right?
Maybe this helps you understand?
ughhhhh
Ouch
not entirely sure where to put this, but i think this channel fits the most
https://www.reddit.com/r/arma/comments/9yj9f6/arma_3_life_custom_map_for_sale/
he should take you up on the #350, that's a great deal!
π
@dull moon
I'll never tire of using that.
https://www.reddit.com/r/Arma3Life/comments/9y5rw0/custom_life_map_for_sale/ @pliant oar violating Arma 3 tools license
His steam account is linked
@soft egret if that's the bar for this channel, read the "Community Job Offers & Hires" A3 Steam subforum. You'll have plenty of stuff to report π
he didnt even add rotation to any of the trees hnnnnnng
I wana buy Seattle map
I wonder how long is ownership protection? 12 years after death or something?
Idk how to say it in English
0 protection
and the seller is violating the arma 3 tools license
He cannot sell it to you. He can only give it away for free
Guess who decided he still wants to sell his map via Steam Discussions: https://steamcommunity.com/app/107410/discussions/0/3020122487789331394/
if there is another mod for a game using the arma 3 voices and theme is that a ip violation?
yes
well this mod for call to arms uses the arma voices and theme https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=742470440
"Arma3 Voices for all factions (WIP)"
Please email to address in channel description infringements@bistudio.com
is also based on stuartisland
class CfgPatches{
class stuartisland{units[]={"stuartisland"};
weapons[]={};
requiredVersion=1.0;
requiredaddons[]={"A3_UI_F","A3_Map_Stratis"};
version="02/02/2015";
fileName="KingsIsland.pbo";
author="Max King";
};
};
class CfgWorlds{class CAWorld;
class Stratis:CAWorld{
class Grid;
class DefaultClutter;
};
class stuartisland:Stratis{
@shell creek ^
has full source if anyone wants to take a look, he sold it to a friend of mine, obfuscated with obfusqf without any binarisation, so full source.
uses mainly stolen stuff anyway
nopixel, cg, a3l
wait. Nopixel is cars isn't it? Why do you need cars for a map?
buildings too
Stuart Islandβs source is licensed under the MIT License
[17:14]
Dusty:
Hey, what's going on with TiredGiraffe or RichGalaxy, I seen you comented on his profile. I bought a map from him now he is MIA lol
[17:14]
twitch.tv/Its_Leigham:
he changed his name
hes breaking arma 3 tos selling the map (which is made with arma 3 tools)
[17:16]
Dusty:=
Yikes he's ignoring me and the map does not pack throught pboproject, I don't know what to do now :(
referencing the guy whos selling the map
π€£
Can you get a screenshot of proof that he bought it or that the bad guy sold it?
Maybe Dwarden needs proof of EULA violation?
Also can't he get the money back via paypal? (I know he can't technically. But could atleast try. Maybe that guy is an idiot)
why could he not get the money back via paypal?
digital goods are not protected
Had that when I sold my hack. The guy got banned and tried to backcharge, paypal denied because digital/immaterial good
paypal was used for purchasing an illegal object maybe?
oh
and your not supposed to use paypal f&f for selling stuff
paypal f&f?
so im guessing if you made a call to paypal could get it sorted easily
friend to friend
Friends & Family
That guy probably would want to do that.. To get the money back he was scammed for
aaa so paypal was used, sorry
im getting the guy to get a screenshot of the conversation
he didn't even bother renaming the map xD
he just changed the pboprefix
ah f&f can be disputed it seems
i just told him to phone paypal, more then likely he will get it sorted on the phone without waiting.
text isn't that good evidence. Can you get a screenshot? I'll drop a message to monetization department
just asked him to get a screenshot
Screenshots aren't really proof either tho tbh
chances are high that tis dude used stolen assets (CUP, ect) to create this map. if that's the case it will be a double lose situation voe everybody who bought it and uploads it to steam
π
I can doctor a screenshot to look like someone said something they didnt in about 2 minutes in about MS Paint π which is why generally I ask for evidence to be via screenshare
A screenshot of him selling the map. Plus the notice on his steam profile that he's selling the map. Plus posts on steam forums that he's selling the map. Plus reddit posts of him selling the map.
I'd say the chance that the screenshot could've been faked is not that significant
he uses the weird version of cup the minified version
Discord can be asked to verify the message ids perhaps if necessary?
Steam not discord
he has threatened to leak my stuff now xD
i just said, im not the one breaking a3tools license.
Mail is out. Directly via red phone
You can also purchase the map for your server. This map is bohemia protected. Contact: http://steamcommunity.com/id/TiredGiraffe"
Find that slightly funny.
Well.. Yeah.. It kinda is.
But not in his favour
Hello quick question, who hands out the various liscences (if anyone)
or can mods simply claim they are liscencesd under whatever they want
You release your mod under a license, there are many options available
But, be very aware, if you βclaimβ a particular license for something that is licensed otherwise, it will be the end of your βArma careerβ.
The group who i suspect is doing it has had no arma career for a while and
thats why i asked
They will then find themselves and βtheirβ mod banned.
Is someone reselling scripts against anything ?
there is a turkish site reselling scripts from a few places
Selling scripts where no BI tools where involved is ok-ish (in txt form for example). As soon as it is a pbo it us prohibited
i mean reselling
Reselling scripts from others? Without autor permission, no
not entirely correct - some licenses allow that
well I didn't give them permission for mine xD
RH, HAFM, NIArms and some others here: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1568181335
GG. Some crap Arma group advertises in TFAR workshop comments.
Turns out they have a TFAR reupload in the workshop items of their group leader.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1557713024 Sahrani reupload
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1509756431 TFAR 1.0 packed as pbo's AND unpacked?! WTF?
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1508184110 UK3CB BAF equipment (with ACRE compats although they are using TFAR? WTF?)
@sweet minnow
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1508155742 3CB Units
looks like they skipped the IQ test for 7thIB
@soft egret
Thx, will check later
Their own code of conduct have a mature attitude
Be able to use Arma 3 Sync to install and update mods.
***NOT BE AN ARSEHOLE***
So.. while your own code of conduct says that. You are instead a immature arsehole who is not using arma3sync but instead reuploading stuff to workshop? .. Well. Good role model as a group leader.
Tja...
I wouldn't dive in it too deep. You stare too long at idiocy, idiocy will stare back at you
I have some free time while waiting for my food to get ready okey! let me look at idiots
Just DMCA and done π
Wasn't there a movie called βstaring at goatsβ?
How about a remake βstaring at idiotsβ feat. Dedmen
π
@soft egret, 7thIB also advertised on all our workshops comments too. Unbelievable.
can't you delete it?
I wouldn't dive in it too deep. You stare too long at idiocy, idiocy will stare back at you Reminds me of Iron Maiden's "Still Life"
I asked lifetap to delete them as he has the Steam account keys, but that was a while ago, so not sure.
Are they really advertising on all the workshop items they ripped off?
any insight on how the eu article 13 could/would affect arma modding and distribution via platforms like the steam workshop?
@pliant oar
STEAM workshop is Valve platform so no idea, most likely yes, expect more dumb AI deployed everywhere
@soft egret ARMA-Life is planned to release shortly, they've stole the metropolis map, a bunch of assets from other communities etc and claiming them as their own (Changing the picture in VR etc) Do you have any plans re TFR for them?
https://gyazo.com/88ee3ff43b66a2cce0fa19be2907ee59
Looks like Repenz is back in the game.
Id guess theyll still churn up a bunch of cash before they get shutdown
they already got shutdown
atleast their monetization approval (that BI gave them, weeks before they planned to go live, back when they had 0 things to show for them) has already been revoked
Wait, theyβve ever cared about approval
Someone has a link for me to look in the repo?
arma life? yeah. pm
@dull moon The men who stare at goats. Totally different.
Β―_(γ)_/Β―
I mean. Unless you have psychedelic powers?

Aaaand PsiSyn has posted a video showing that he's behind that new Life server by Repentz. Β―_(γ)_/Β―
Of course.
they continue making a payday out of that scam since theres no punishments dealt out
Seems like ripped GTA things too
rockstar might be interested in that
why do people think they can get away with that shit...
they give mod making a bad name
Well, it's PsiSyn. So what do you expect?
also known for sketcy lifemod schemes
to be fair, i believe the map was made by someone else or it has already been around for a while
but regardless its blatently ripped content
Here is the video in question: https://youtu.be/c5kJGlogJR4
"We aren't monetizing it, so it's not an issue".
"we aren't monetizing it" but they requested and also got monetization approval in the past.. Until I reported them.
oh my god his laugh
it's forced for sure.
did I just see KA weapons in there?
most likely
with permission or nah?
KA doesn't care. Nor does he care about the stuff he stole by himself
They 100% didn't ask for permission for everything. They didn't ask me which is why they got reported and their monetization approval revoked.
no DMCA for their edit of TFAR?
Also CUP prison?
I think they are following APL license so no reason to DMCA
Well.
You may not offer or impose any additional or different terms or conditions on, or apply any Effective Technological Measures to, Adapted Material that restrict exercise of the rights granted under the Adapter's License You apply.
ebo'ing might count as a "technological measure"
illegal technological measuer since EBO is BI use only
grants You the right to extract, reuse, reproduce, and Share all or a substantial portion of the contents of the database for NonCommercial and ArmaOnly purposes only;
Yes. You cannot extract and reuse anymore. License breach
saw that too hahaha
Also very nice if you listen to the video. "There is this life server, made by other people"
minute later: "They very kindly gave us full permission to use their map"
"I have nothing to do with it" vs "our server"
a few month ago: "i've split with repentz for his actions"
in this video: "repentz did a great job"
Β―_(γ)_/Β―
They are releasing the server on friday. Because they know that BI won't do anything over the weekend.
Neither will rockstar
Neither will I π π»
But I'm not doing anything anyway. I just write text messages to random people
This is very off topic already.. but.. how do you guys even keep track of this? How do you remember what that one guy said once, a few months ago?
the krauts have time travel
achtung itz ze germans
Just human long term memory to be honest.
Watched a video once, remembers stuff
If you are asking about ip violations by people generally then.. spreadsheets
Atleast I have a spreadsheet for monetized server stuff. I don't have one for steam workshop
that and his shit head response to it burnt it into most people's memories
That and the fact that it appeared that PsiSyn threw Repentz under the bridge... Just goes to show my opinion of PsiSyn was entirely justified tbh
Sort of memorable that one
drama bre
You're still supporting them. You're responsible for your content, if you play on such a server you promote them.
You're actively promoting thiefs, no matter how you like to rephrase it.
He left the Arma Discord already? Or was he banned?
Both
Disclaimer:
501stΒ Legion has no rights to the maps/mods in this mod, Cruisie has no rights to the maps/mods in this mod.
Then maybe they shouldn't be uploading this mod. π€
Wait.. I remember that... https://discordapp.com/channels/105462288051380224/105792634995388416/411143379708149770
@elfin oriole @royal gulch @latent mesa @valid sand
https://www.gofundme.com/arma-3-starsim-501st-legion wow. π
@trim remnant @candid ore
You guys may want to fix that.
Keep in mind that you are violating #rules while you don't fix that. Which will probably get you removed from this discord.
π
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1570053049 Wait.. I've seen that image before. Didn't I DMCA these last week?
Would explain why that thing has been uploaded just yesterday
Who takes care of ww2 i44 copyright? https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1144240751
Man the leaders of that 501st group are a gold mine for ip rights violations, but I guess that's just normal with star wars groups..
Oh also
@trim remnant as you are here right now anyway, you might aswell fix your own illegal reupload
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=690235342
Also @candid ore
I sure hope that the "TFAR Animations" inside https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1570053049 Are not just a ripped version of @stoic beacon's mod.
Considering your test branch of your "Auxillary mod" (https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1495404417) contains a reupload of @stoic beacon's kka3_TFAR_Animations.pbo
I'm starting to doubt.
@wise cairn you are also related to that? Atleast they list you as developer. Didn't expect that.
You might wanna help your buddies get this fixed π
I just dmca'd them a few days ago....
When I get home I'll file another one if it's not resolved here by then, waiting for the crawler to initialize it
@left mesa https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=927186633
it contains mods that either isn't on the workshop, doesn't fully work on the workshop You know you cannot just upload other peoples stuff right?
If the mod authors has any problems with this pack, contact me first. That's not really how that works.
well that's 5-6 reports within 5 minutes, thanks for the links @soft egret π
@soft egret so i have to ask, have you even tried the mod? none of it was stolen. This mod is to fix some issues from another mod while have some retextures. I even talk to the mod team and they all have no issues with the mod. At least talk to the developer before you make your claims. I'm sure you just looked at the description and made this post.
I looked at the description and at the content in there
Even if you asked https://forums.bohemia.net/forums/topic/141101-deadfasts-third-person-view-for-arma-3/ Deadfast whether you can reupload his mod.
Steam subscriber agreement still forbids you to upload other peoples stuff.
Even if you have permission from everyone, you still cannot reupload it.
And considering you wrote If the mod authors has any problems with this pack, contact me first. I'm 99.999% sure that you didn't ask them. Because if you did, you wouldn't have written that.
β
dingdingding
the issue is this is a modified version that he doesn't have on the workshop
You represent and warrant to us that you have sufficient rights in all User Generated Content to grant Valve and other affected parties the licenses described under A. and B. above or in any license terms specific to the applicable Workshop-Enabled App or Workshop page. This includes, without limitation, any kind of intellectual property rights or other proprietary or personal rights affected by or included in the User Generated Content. In particular, with respect to Workshop Contributions, you represent and warrant that the Workshop Contribution was originally created by you (or, with respect to a Workshop Contribution to which others contributed besides you, by you and the other contributors, and in such case that you have the right to submit such Workshop Contribution on behalf of those other contributors).
You furthermore represent and warrant that the User Generated Content, your submission of that Content, and your granting of rights in that Content does not violate any applicable contract, law or regulation.```
TL:DR If it ain't yours, you can fuck off with your upload π
Wait, if you get permission from deadfast to make your own "version" of his mod you can't upload that? IE: Deadfast 3rd person view (My version).
βThe author doesnβt have it on the Workshop so Iβll steal it and upload it for himβ is about the most stupid defense you can spout.
yes
Wouldn't that mean you have colaborated with the author and made contributions to the mod?
Cancer
Okay
It's not your decision that you are a collaborator though. It's the original dev's AFAIK @carmine folio
and you mention you were on our TS where? I didn't
@brisk ember
I understand that. I'm not entirely sure what's going on in this specific situation. But if my friend makes a mod, allows me to make my version and upload it. Would I be allowed to do so?
Yes. If you are a contributor and have permission by all other contributors. Then you can.
Actually. Not only permission by others. Permission by others to upload on THEIR BEHALF.
^^
just in case
Depends on how you view contributions. Does one have to βsubstantially contributeβ to an item to be defined as a contributor, or can they merely tweak a setting? But if the author considers you a contributor to that derivative no matter how small the change, youβre good with his (and all other authorsβ) permission
and not some edited autoresponse mail from BIS
if you edit a mod by having the original as dependency, then you are fine, if you edit the original files, you are not unless you get written permission as @dull moon said above
Ok, appreciate the clearification! π
that said, if the original mod EULA is ND, then you are out of luck
depends on how far the original content creator wants to enforce that ND clause
Yeah, I understand that. I was just thinking about 6D in steam workshop EULA. It's a bit unclear with definitions imo.
any sort of modification to an original content goes under derivative work
bugfixes or not, compatibility or not
π
@carmine folio it's very clear - unless you own IP rights for the content, you cannot upload
If there were multiple creators and you wish to make a derivative, you require permission from all contributors to the project. Canβt just ask one. (Going back to your original question as an example)
if it is a group (like RHS, CUP, 3CB), you need permission from the group - in general it's a group decission (democratic or not, etc)
if there are individual contributors that did parts on their own or whatever
then yes, from each of the authors
@echo orchid "Unless you own IP rights for the content, you cannot upload". That's clear(er) ;)
what about stuff like this for ND? https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1463113679
You represent and warrant to us that you have sufficient rights in all User Generated Content to grant Valve and other affected parties the licenses described under A. and B.
that is preciselly what is says here
i will give you an example i am familiar with - RHS
we have an ND license
that means that every single compatibility mod, retexture etc
is breaching our EULA
we can choose to tolerate these, or enforce our EULA
Ah, yeah, true. My bad. That's an easy way to just choose what to.. exactly ahhaha
even if we silently tolerate these, we can, legally, always put our foot down
Issues a violation against six lines of code
{
class Man;
class CAManBase: Man
{
extCameraPosition[]={0.40000001,-0.2,-1.2};
};
};```
Right, some people just love to poke shit for things they aren't the police of.
??
you cannot really own IP rights over configs btw
i mean you can only right a config in a certain way
what you gonna copyright against? config values?
class names?
language
class names and their prefixes might work
yeah that might do, but still
Given the Oracle ruling against Google for Java, which was about mostly the API naming and organisation it isn't a big stretch to say that this config would be covered in the USA.
i was referencing a violation posted against a mod, the mod is quite literally six lines of code. because it contains someone elses code? like dude. theres only certain ways you can write scripts
What if someone writes a config and you copy paste it?
IE: Adding all the sound files in the game so they're available in triggers etc.
a. that is not a script
I don't think the rest of the world has that type of coverage yet, it certainly isn't something they could do with out a lawsuit.
b. everyone is using the same config setup as BI is
sure, you could indeed say that class rhs_awesomesouce is copyrighted material, but you'd look a bit of an ass
So was this a case of people white knighting and just filing violations because they felt like it?
or because someone actually thinks they need to issue a violation over how to write code?
because it contains someone elses code?
Exactly. It doesn't matter what is inside there. What matters is that it's being reused without permission.
Yes you are right. There is no reason to copy this mod and reupload it without permission. You might aswell just write the couple lines by yourself.
But that's not what happened here. If someone wrote the 6 lines by himself. He'd be the author and done. 0 problems.
No one can own code
lol
theres only certain ways to write code,
what?
lul wat
Wut
Yeah. Same as there is only certain ways to make music
On this point you are utterly wrong.
Of course you can own the code
or only certain ways to paint paintings. Or to record movies. Or to write movie scripts. Right?
That means no one has the right on what they make. Right?.. Exactly!
the issue with the 6 lines from that config, and this is vert specific
a. it has not a single custom class
b. it has not a single custom macro
the boy that copy pasted the code could be done it this way instead:
{
class Man;
class CAManBase: Man
{
extCameraPosition[]={0.4,-0.2,-1.2};
};
};
If it is an exact copy of another mod with files renamed then I guess it is a breach of the Steam workshop conditions regardless. But when it comes to talking 6 lines copied of config you are into Oracle v Google territory of ruling
^
Even if those 6 lines were copied from some other mod. You are right. We couldn't tell and it wouldn't matter as there are only very few ways to write exactly that.
But as I said. That's not what happened. It's clearly visible that this is just a mod made by another author, that has just been taken and reuploaded, how many lines it contains doesn't matter.
will rather copy paste stuff from all over the place
than learn to do that themselves
your example of DMCA is idiotic simply because these 6 lines of code are generic
take any complicated script instead, that can be written in N number of way to achieve the same result
and you have a different result
conclussion - theft is theft no matter if it is a single line or n lines
would it stand in court for the 6 lines of config? surely not, but that is besides the point
@soft egret removed the mod
this whole thing is super annoying especially on thanksgiving day. Next time let the mod authors deal with the issue. DMCA takedowns is more for YOU are claiming that it contains stuff that YOU created. With you doing a DMCA takedown on the 501st aux mod, you were claiming that there was a mod in their pack that was yours. If not, you have no ground to do a DMCA on Eular. Next time talk to the mod authors and let them know and let them handle the issue. A lot of this can be handled by talking it over.
Was it DMCAd then?
im talking about @soft egret doing a dmca on the 501st aux mod
@left mesa lol what? thanksgiving day is not a world wide celebration, i for one couldn't care about it
If his stuff (TFAR) is in there, he has the right to do so
Kripto's mod doesnt if thats what you are referring to
secondly, use shit that you own
otherwise I don't think it was him
DedmenToday at 5:47 AM
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1570053049 Wait.. I've seen that image before. Didn't I DMCA these last week?```
there won't be any DMCA
probably because it had TFAR files in it
and you would be able to enjoy your day off
@left mesa it was me that filed the DMCA, not sure if Dedmen filed one as well
Next time talk to the mod authors and let them know and let them handle the issue.
you boy do have some nerve
The original author can DMCA you without ever saying a word to you and it'd be perfectly fine
why would the owner of IP rights spend any time trying to convince you to remove something he OWNs
besides, if you reupload stuff that isn't yours you're not a mod author. You're a thief.
I've lost track, are we refferring to the 501st auxillary mod? or the unit mod pack
both had the radio animations
Both? Pretty sure only the aux mod had them
With you doing a DMCA takedown I'm not doing that. I gave them the chance to fix it by themselves. Also afaik there is nothing in there that I made.
I'm just forcing them to pay attention to it. Because they have been DMCA'ed for illegal reuploads in the past, and now they were at it again with no sign of stopping.
Didn't I DMCA these last week? Yeah. I DMCA'ed another pack of them last week. Because it contained TFAR.
I am looking at the modpack, only the 501st aux mod has it
Euler said he'll get it removed when some member from his group comes online. He probably didn't remove it yet.
Just give him 24 hours before the DMCA comes in π
Ah, but it was taken down already because I filed a DMCA. There was a reason for this, you can't just upload it again and think you're fine
wait a reupload today?
This is going very off topic but I can't believe these guys are trying to argue and guilt people they stole from smh
@stoic beacon im sure they reuploaded the mod thinking that it was the swop developers doing a dmca takedown on them since it litterly happened during the whole drama situation. I'm sure @candid ore would've understood and removed the mod if you talk to him and ask him to removed the mod
Dealt with, talked to Euler.
Yeah, I can verify that. Recently SWOP stole some other mod team's content and passed it off as thier own, which just turned into a shitshow
If a DMCA comes in for your mod... why the hell wouldn't you go over every single asset in your upload and remove shit that isn't yours?
thinking that it was the swop developers doing a dmca takedown on them no reason to reupload then. And think you'll be fine this time while doing the exact same thing again
instead of only the part that you think SWOP DMCA'd for
Better idea than recommending mod authors come talk instead of DMCA: Donβt steal shit
@brisk ember why would you upload shit you don't own in the first place
You gotta be real ignorant to 'accidently' include a mod that isn't yours
thanks PuFu π
Meh, i distanced myself from them after I saw what was happening
Recently SWOP stole some other mod team's content and passed it off as thier own which is exactly why SWOP is banned here and on BIF.
π
Yeah, it was fucking helarious to watch
One's gotta wonder the percentage of SWOP that isn't stolen
is a safe guess
^
Maybe the configs. π
π
jet packs is from the exo suit mod
This is getting a bit off topic, SWOP is banned for that exact reason, so there's no need to talk about it anymore
Surprised Disney didn't follow them after moving to VK
international copyright laws
It's actually good to know what SWOP did wrong. I didn't know all the specifics till now
copyright doesn't translate well.
in Russia you mean? I think VK is Russian π€
copyright is outdated
copyright doesn't translate in russian or chinese π
^
Then how did you get the idea it was perfectly fine to upload the radio animations in your mod when you knew it wasn't yours?
@stoic beacon just wondering who notified you that the 501st aux mod had the animations?
does it matter?
How's that relevant?
the timing is too perfect
Even if SWOP was going after you. Why did you reupload then? If SWOP had 0 copy-right on your stuff, you could've counter claimed the DMCA.
You took it down though. So I assume you know that you have SWOP copyrighted content in there? In which case you cannot reupload it either
litterly the 501st and 212th was removed from the swop discord and then here comes the dmca
coincidence by the sounds of it
It was no member of any star wars themed MilSim group, I can guarantee that
counter claiming means you would have to go to court
@left mesa "who notified" -> https://discordapp.com/channels/105462288051380224/105792634995388416/515095400705687563
offtopic - star wars milsim - what?
'starsim' for short
shudders
people whom play arma with star wars mods
nightmares are coming back again...
they usually play clone wars, empire or what not
that sounds like a 80s B movie
I've actually hit myself in the head several times throughout this "thread".
starsim, made my day
I've played a few times with some large groups... There was no organization.. Just pure chaos
Milsim with more literal pew pew sounds
Milsim where lasers don't actually go through people
@left mesa counter claim doesnβt necesary means you need to go to court, but lawyers will be involved
Firstly, SWOP was ripped from other content. So if βyour modβ contains SWOP content, your in for a whole heap of trouble anyways.
when lawyers is involved, money is involved, then here comes disney. anyway i fixed my issue im done here
Milsim where your sgt in the internet military is always right because there's no laserblaster platoon and squad handbook.
iβm too old for internet ranks, much less so for made up ones featuring lasers
but enough OT
@candid ore if youβre here to talk about SWOP you can stop now and leave.
i don't believe he was, he was here to talk to kola about a violation. i beleive they have it resolved
Iβll make this a bit clearer. When someone steals anotherβs IP, they have no room to complain.
When you make $638/month using other peoples mods, why not just make your own? π€¨
Also selling exclusive "nonmember" access to your server is prohibited per Arma's monetization terms
But it includes your Arma server, and you list yourselves as "Arma 3 Starsim" directly above the $50 charge for public members to access private operations in Arma.
I've been gone for 2 hours and I come back to a wall of text the size of half of the new testament π
Just Revelations ...
There'a also likely a problem with making $638+ a month without monetization approval..
There's no way in hell you reinvest all that $$$.
They don't need to reinvest. Also as long as they don't give arma content back for that money. they don't need approval
Just curious. Isn't all of star wars exclusive? As in you can't do what you're doing, unrelated to arma. I thought disney didn't allow people to make games, mods etc regarding star wars.
true
You can build a superhigh end server box for way less than $2k
And yes, they're infringing on Disney copyright
But Disney hasn't sued them/taken them down yet.
So, that 600 a month could technically fuck them over when mickey mouse come knocking?
aaaaaaaaaa he said the s word
They would liable for the money, yes.
I think that's a game not worth playing but each to their own π€
I'm not sure I even want to mention this again to prevent being affiliated in any type of way. You guys don't understand. South parks episode about disney is mild.
Ahhhh the SWOP people are spilling over
@brisk ember Regarding your comment here https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1570053049 Could you point out any infringing addons in this upload please?
The radio animations made by kola
They have been removed prior to this upload
Then I've commented incorrectly
No problem, just making sure. Thanks!
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1495404417 this item still has it though. But kola already said he'll take care of it when he has time
Yes our test branch is a little behind the main upload, we will get it rectified once the uploader returns
@stoic beacon While I'm here I would also like to apologise for the inclusion of your IP in our pack without your consent. I'll do my best to make sure nothing like that happens again.
π
@soft egret wats going on...? and wat am I supposed to do π¦
Are reskins/textures of BI A3 models considered off-limits?
As long as you are not reusing parts of the original texture. That's totally fine
didnt they release some texture templates for that?
Okay, just was looking up a picture of a Xi'an, and just saw a reskinned one from armaholic.
So I wasn't sure.
Yeah the texture templates from Arma 3 samples are also fine
Good to know.
@real socket this seems to be on twitter just fine, one week later:
https://twitter.com/Arma3official/status/1063438038104199170
Hello, @echo orchid. As I mentioned before this was clearly a mistake on my part, and it is pretty hard for us to vet these sort of things, as there are so many of these things out there. We have decided to keep the post there as we don't want to hide our mistakes, and what is being posted will stay online forever. I have however noted all your feedback from this, and make sure that all content is properly checked for the future, and as I mentioned previously this was done by me, and is my mistake alone. I am new to alot of this, and I questioned this photo before I posted it. I should however have checked it more thoroughly before i posted it.
However, I am doing another Community Spotlight today, so if anyone would like to suggest a screenshot, video, or mod for it feel free to DM me. If you would like to help me "proof" it, then I am also open to sharing it with some of you before I release it.
@real socket Hey man fair enough, i was just under the impression you'll guys look into it, and remove it.
We did look into it, and decided to keep it there as we don't want to hide these mistakes. π
yeah got it
What exactly is wrong with that picture
Backpacks stolen from RHS and Battlefield 4.
Uniform stolen from DayZ
So mods are not allowed in pictures
But whats the big deal then?
Stolen models that are #ip_rights_violations aren't allowed
It's stolen and modified content
Oh so RHS pack is all stolen stuff
πΏ
Read again what i wrote
π
I never said anything in RHS is stolen
They stole the stuff FROM rhs
Ok still dont get it... So if i wear a rhs backpack i stole it from them?
The mod that is pictured, stole items from RHS (and others), purported it to be their own, and it was tweeted by Arma, giving the violators more exposure.
Ohh they said its thier mod
And they modified it, yes.
Ok i see now
They changed model a bit and slapped new texture on it.
@upbeat flame Dodorex: Oh so RHS pack is all stolen stuff
say WHAT?
??
that backpack is one of RHS models, made by RHS for RHS
the one in that picture is an edited version of the RHS backpack, which means it is ripped and edited
got it now?
Yes i got it before chill down i may not be as smart as you in this
? Dont get it oh well
precisely what i meant
Is it not good to understand more?
@dull moon CUP reupload, also RH stuff.
I will file a DMCA once I'm home, but I thought you might want to have a look at it as well.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1563980296
@dull moon looks like they deleted your comment.
I wanted to talk to them, but they instantly banned me π€¦
the item is gone
they deleted it...
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1300454647 maybe some things of interest in there, including CUP
thx
wats wrong with that mArmAga mod
reuploads of many mods
would he have to do like a modlist instead?
unautorized reuploads of 3rd party content like CUP ect
@Immersion Cigs pretty sure this is a nono in lifepacks at all
@wise cairn
creating mod dependencies to the original mods on the workshop page fixes this
but not including it to a BS modpack
@blissful arch it was EWK cigs that's not allowed.
ahh
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1496744221 if you take a look at mine
it requires CBA + TaskforceRadio
@dull moon so if that guy did something like this https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=740883628 it would be fine?
or if he asked each and every dev if he could reupload?
Yes collections are fine
But. Immersion Cigs: For educational purposes. Do not use the content in your works without our explicit permission.
Sooo... Essentially a "do not use this" line.
or if he asked each and every dev if he could reupload? no. Violates Steam Subscriber Agreement. Even with permission it's not allowed
well he has my mod in their without asking, so thats a definite no xD
oh its a steam thing k
not only. CUP license for example prohibits reuploads in general. to reupload a 3rd party mod, the uploader needs written permission and transfer off IP and copyright by the original autor
steam workshop eula section 6d
steam is easier to control this,
i see
TL:DR and better to understand:
it's common sense and respect for the creation and rights of others that should prevent uploads like we see too often
i see
Now in that case of that guy who reuploaded like 50 mods, im guessing he did that for ease of adding all mods cause then all u have to do is add one mod to ur launcher rather then adding all 50 individually and forgetting one if that makes sense, what should he do instead?
Create a steam collection. Or a html modlist (I think arma launch can export these)
steam mod collection is the way to go
Oh yea I forgot about the HTML export.
subscribing to the collection get's you all the mods included.
imagine over a million (1/4 of all arma players) have CUP already downloaded, and this guy forces his players to download it again... for what?
I see.
or he is too lazy to update the server when the mods get updated
What about arma3Sync? I don't know too much about arma 3 sync but is it not like you have our own repo that you upload the mods to and then just link that to ppl to download?
Repentz live in psisyn's stream "I never said I made that TFAR animation" "Oh yeah. If it's not fine then I'll remove it, I didn't know that"
Repentz not knowing that ripping stuff, repacking it, renaming it, encrypting it is not fine? sure.
"I'm completely complying with everything, and we are not monetized" uhuh totally explains why I found them via bohemia's monetized servers list, and reported them for using TFAR without permission..
Repentz: "Dedmen is lying, I never pretended to have made these animations" Yeah. They are called AL_Animations with a MapEBO-Repentz.bisign. And the mod.cpp says author = "Repentz\Travis\Fini";
Sure you didn't pretend to have made them. You clearly said they were made by kola. Here see, this is what you said "Look, check out our new cool animations" See! "looK, check Out our new cooL Animations" K O L A. Clearly. Kola. Clearly said they are made by kola. I mean. It's perfectly obvious!
He is streaming and planting his drama again
drama regarding what though?
old bs
has anything been reported to David? or BI
not yet, might follow. usage of EBO format
Yeah all of it couple days ago.
Psisyn just got wind of it and is now and making drama out of it
i see, i saw him being banned but now its spilling over to me.
if you've got proof of them violating anything can you post a link to the rules
and the proof
or add me and dm me
litteraly all of the stuff on their server was ebos
they posted tutorials all over the place on how to do it
<removed link> here is one from everybodys favourite
afaik both BI and David is more than aware of the bloke
Multiple violations including re-PBOed mods such as : Exilemod , Diwako's STALKER-like anomalies, MrSanchez' Headlamps, RZ Infection, Zombies and Demons
and possibly more.
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=885353754
PS: Their server was already warned by BI for selling in-game items. They don't care and keep selling "premium" items, and obviously don't care about other modders creations.
Wait, he repacked them, again?
i aalso told him his ""donations"" would not fly
https://i.imgur.com/sMrpJ5s.png
i see he also changed thatpage to require a login now
@burnt oak , just noticed he did delete your pbo, eventually. You were lucky enough to notice, I guess. Many didn't.
As for ""donations"", he just converted real money to some in-game rad-points currency , that can be obtained by play hours or bought (if you don't want to grind). Have no idea on how BI handles cases like these. I was more about bringing to your attention the violation of a mass content repack and re-upload to workshop.
he grabbed my mod from github and just packed it un compiled into his modpack, the mod obviosuly did not work then and he requested support from me as my mod was "non work"
email this to infringements@bistudio.com
They don't care and keep selling "premium" items also drop a mail to monetization@bistudio.com
@hallow lark infringement is for copyright infringements. Not monetization violations
I don't remember him having monetization approval. I can't look at it as it's behind registration :u
the 2 options he had were "protection of your base" and loot
if you go over the VK site you can read stuff about "premium users" will get a gps on spawn and have some higher loot rate or something
and you 1:1 exchange ingame currency now according to some post
Hey, quick question for you guys. Probably a pretty stupid one but I would rather be safe than sorry.
When making a new terrain, if you use assets from another mod (like rocks or buildings or whatever) and they become a dependency for your terrain, thatβs all kosher right?
I donβt need to ask permission or something to use another mod as a dependency?
yes using dependencies is all good
@dapper ocean do not confuse putting someoneβs content into your mod with βdependencyβ
One requires another mod to work, the other is taking someoneβs work without permission.
@fossil basalt Just to clarify, the situation I was asking about would be where the map would literally not load correctly without having the other mod loaded.
I donβt mean like cherrypicking out .PBOs or anything.
Yes that's the real kola
Ah right okay, wasn't too sure
I think all dedmen was saying is that you tagged the real kola, not that the mod is legit
both are the real kola
you can just go to his profile on steam. And check his other workshop contributions
Oh okay... just odd it just has the ARMA logo... his stuff normally has a custom image for the mod...
And, ah, he contributed to someone else's workshop... missed that
Yep, it's legit π
hmmm
just had an idea:
reporting illegal monetizing servers (US based) to the IRS
π
Would that require the servers to be hosted in the US or just the community to be based there?
good question
right
If you are A american who owns a german Arma group, living in germany. You still pay US taxes
But there's one issue, communities aren't set up the same way a conventional business would be, so how does taxing work? Would the monetization need to be listed as a normal income?
if they have set up a rooster, the fool on the top get's the boot
But then what's stopping the people on the next highest level stepping up and continuing?
getting the boot right after?
Hmm suppose, but remember, a large amount of arma players aren't exactly known for their high intelligence levels
And will keep doing it
not my problem. if they illegally monetize, they shall pay for it
Ignorance does not protect one from punishment```
Fair enough, I personally think the whole monetization thing was a poor idea to start with
@soft egret OT, but that is one of the reasons, not the main one that I, an Englishman in the US will never be a citizen... the reach of the US IRS...
I mean any income, is income, just depends if it's taxable, which money from monetizing your server would be taxable
The US IRS operates differently from most other national tax collectors for US citizens... but OT
not really OT if it's related to how to punish rules violations.
true, not the perfect channel for it, but it comes close
Just meant my comments not your suggestion
i might try to report a server that is illegally monetizing cup to the appropriate institution, just to see what happens
if this works, this would be hell of a big ass governmental hammer to the face.
The original owner of MOTO back in A2 was reported to the IRS. That's why he was no longer the owner of MOTO. Reporting works, but not sure how one goes about it. May have been Paypal that reported it.
Fun fact: if you where born in america you need to be double sure you distanced that american citizenship otherwise to them you still need to pay taxed
Some swedish Life guy got inpected for tax a few years back and he had to appeal for more donations to keep himself out of prison
I have the post screenshot somewhere
Its a dangerous game once the income becomes significant
That guy had bought himself a new car (immediately worth a lot less) and paid his rent with the income so he was exposed to a sudden liquidity crisis when the taxman audited his paypal
Why he couldnt just sell his car instead of asking his community to bail him out i have no idea
probably did but, as you say it would have depreciated straight off the forecourt and he was left with negative equity....
For my community, I save receipts for every community related expense (servers, etc), and file them as deductions. Since the expenses outweigh the donations, and I cover the rest, I am good with the IRS.
AWG Mod: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=952141515
Seems to contain ripped models from Ravaged the game.
Image of the model from there site http://ravaged.wikia.com/wiki/Gyro_Copter
https://i.gyazo.com/4b130bb90340f23b75c63edcdbc991c4.jpg
https://i.gyazo.com/a6e72566d65deb9b431ed08880486447.jpg
This mod can only be used with express permission of its authors
Wow. They must be really busy giving out permission to over 80 thousand people.
@errant drum ^ You are co-author on that item
@orchid plume is the other
Kadmon π€
https://www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/gyrocopter-3d-model-1175436 @carmine folio @soft egret
Not the first time we see ripped models being sold.
The game is from 2012. That model was uploaded in 2017
https://www.turbosquid.com/3d-models/arma3-3-a3-ambulance-3d-1221009 last screenshot seems to be from a familiar 3d editing software
Royalty free 3D model A3 Ambulance for download as 3ds and fbx on TurboSquid: 3D models for games, architecture, videos. (1221009)
AWG Also seems to contain a model from Fallout New Vegas as well.
https://i.gyazo.com/e74796116f1484510d893ad37d861622.jpg
http://fallout.wikia.com/wiki/Feral_ghoul_(Fallout:_New_Vegas)
well max classname probably refers to maxlioner or w.e
That was from a zombie mod already on steam that they got permission to edit iirc
Yea
but they still got "permission" to edit content stolen from fallout
pretty obvious model at that
its a ghoul which is quit iconic lol
Never played fallout here nor ravanged game, but I guess you canβt trust what came from others or purchased even if the site is more credited
yeah that's asking for trouble if you buy a model from a website or ask for someone's permission to use their mod and not check where the hell it comes from.
turbosquid and other 3d marketplaces don't have great track records of taking down stolen content.
and pleading ignorance is a pretty old tale too
Im passing the time at work on discord, I know about that model as it was almost contributed to exilemod
How did no one spot that as being a fallout model prior to now? π
I guess constantly throwing money at a problem doesn't always solve it.. π€£
The guy who made all the vehicles stopped and it never got added
Wasnβt questioned
answer to that question is pretty simple @strong jasper . it's a human condition to think you can get away with something by simply saying you didn't know what you were doing.
Oh definitely, I used it loads when I was a kid. π
i use it every day at work...does that count?
Yup!
oh, am i really sat in the first class carriage....I do apologise. I'll move
π€£
Friend of mine had the same situation @hushed spoke the conductor said "What do you mean you didn't know? Look at these beautiful luxurious chairs". My friend all drunk "I don't find them that beautiful". π He was still asked to move to 2nd class
lol
good point
A friend of mine never pays for the train; he's deaf and so when they ask him for the ticket he starts signing away until the conductor leaves. π€£
well....it sort of is isn't it? just not an arma one so, point taken
never hurts to provide analogies though.... π€
didn't mean to derail the convo.... ouch! π
Kappa
@soft egret yeah both models came directly from 2 mods (Max Zombies on the workshop and Exilemod unreleased model) , just assumed they were ok. Will be removed thanks for the heads up
It's always a problem reusing 3rd party content. One can never be sure that the real origin is
Gamecloseoff???
Vac ban or game ban?
well if one thinks rules dont apply to him
1.5hrs to taint his account
Reminds me of this dutch group I came in contact with, a fellow dutchie claimed they had a good dutch modpack, well not so. The few dutch assets they had where stolen from LowlandsWarrior, and a lot of others they stole from too, all uploaded to the workshop. I talked to the guys, they claimed to be Military, they where VeVa (private military themed school looked down upon by the real dutch military because of common bad behavior and bad habbits) and to top it off the entirety of the staff had vac bans for one or more games...
After cleaning up their act they had the balls to ask me to join them, how about no?
Storing all of it in Google Drive (not sure if that's typically allowed)
@soft egret TFAR included
TRYK, VVVV, WomenMod, TR8, A3Life, XCAM_Taunus, POP, NP, mr_warehouse, JBAD, HLC, D3S, ASDG, ASN, Burnes, BNAE, BABE, ASN, AL
Some of it's EBO'd as well lol
Guess Repentz has given up on the Steam workshop then? That is his server
Love how their financial aims are $249.98 for server costs and $500 to pay the developers each month
I think that's noble... if he actually gave the $500/month to the people who did the real development.
LOL!
Fat chance of that - I think everyone here is utterly aware of how noble PsiSyn and Repentz are π
fixing my phone and then taking all credit for it
@blissful arch have you tried to contact them?
not worth the issue
people gave psisyn shit on their stream when he did it, if it becomes an issue ill contact him myself
another repack... https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1241237014
