#ip_rights_violations
1 messages · Page 39 of 1
well openly breaching the EULA and carrying out clear, auditable commercial activities means yo ucan easily be assessed for and then pursued for damages
is selling a script you wrote in notepad a breach of eula though? 😄
when you make a p3d with their tool, fair enough, they have the say over that
if yousell itto me in private it's s ofar down the enforcement radar it doesn't exist
but a plain text file with SQF code in it is not a clear case imo
but if you launch an e-commerce site, it's right there for al lt osee, in your face, and clear wha tthe pricing is, what the product is, and who is selling it
as far as i am aware the legal team actually sent out emails to one of these websites that old them "yes you are allowed to sell without utilizing the bohemia content" or something (after these sites contacted them)
THAT is so ripe for a takedown, and possible damages claim, UNLESS it also is not considered for enforcement
could probably argue about it for ages 😄
well it implies, as yo usuggest, that e-commerce transactions for in-game content are not enforced
which is news to me. interesting...
who knew lol
always depends on what they sell specifically
it definitely breaches the EULA, as the EULA has that catch-all phrasing
but it's then down to enforcement policy
so these guys are operating "at-risk"
but that all catching phrase is what is the issue imo, its so vague
deliberately so
like all good licenses - it provides a safety net for al leventualities
a bunch of people will say SQF scripts -> 100% under EULA, and others will say 100% not, it would be REALLY interesting to see what a court would rule over this
then the ydecide how and when and where and t owhat extent to enforce it
just dont sue me first bohemia 😉
😂
You are entitled to use the Program for your own use, but you are not entitled to:
Publish and/or distribute the computer Program or any of its parts (meaning no classnames or lines taken from a BI config)
Exploit the Program or any of its parts for any commercial purpose (meaning not selling stuff for the game on an e-commerce site)```
100% covered by the A3 EULA
so it's down to a relaxed enforcement policy
i.e. it's not really harming BI's interests enough to warrant asking legal to deal with it
but if you get big enough, watch out!
ignoring the part whether its breaching the eula or not, i also dont see bohemia sueing them anytime soon unless they start doing some REALLY shady stuff that only hurts the reputation
this channel would probably explode right now
but all the talkative people are offline 
am off to bed too. nice chatting as always!
good night 👋
several years back Marek was pretty clear that commercial activity is doable as long as it doesnt violate their terms
which is dont use their tools, dont use their data (+ dont use their brand and other IP)
with third party tools making BI tools no longer necessary in some areas, this is no longer as restrictive as it once was
also you can sell the source data with a guide how to make it into Arma usable format
with the influx of new ppl (DayZ and since), they have been a lot more careful in their wording and statements being fully aware of the potential issues this topic can lead to
plus they want to have as much control themselves and benefit of any commercial activity obviously
still they can do only so much
@olive sparrow how I read that above paragraph is that You cant exploit == use the program (ARMA 3) in any commercial activity. But selling a script is not using the program? As in Arma3 is not run nowhere near the sale of the .txt file
What kind of modles they provide and how they are made that I dont know, but as its been stated P3D even can be made without tools. Sure Bohemia could probably intervene in the use of their game format, but not quite sure if I've seen anything related to the actual format in any EULA
afaik alwarend blender tools is also non-commercial
that being said, i can sell a model done for arma, all configs and model.cfg done, and have a .bat file done for injecting stuff from whatevah software to oxygen
I'm starting to think the modding community might not even need Bohemias involvement in making a dlc...
If a group can put together a set of tools themselves (i.e. hire mikero to make a non-BI toolset) they can set up an e-commerce platform and launch a dlc on it.
ifthose Life guys can do it, the milsimmers could too, and save rather a lot of money that would otherwise have gone to Bohemia. This is purely theoretical btw!
i'm purely chasing the rabbit down the hole here
see, my take on it is - if i make a config and it has class cfgvehicles then that is derived from the game content and so i cannot put it to commerical use
good point
so if they can do it, so could we all.
level playing field etc
I'd prefer to make a DLC with bohemia, as it could be a great partnership, but if the rules are relaxed enough to allow e-commerce trading of game content, then why give away several £m just for goodwills sake?
hell, we could putthat money into pure marketing and make the DLC sell far and wide.
it makes perfect commercial sense NOT to make a dlc with bohemia, if they allow this kind of commercial supply.
Id think it would need to be some sort of "make your own DLC source file kit though"
since I think using Armas Binarize.exe cant(?) be circumvented
ah i see, so there is a real wall in this.
you can't supply a pbo
wel lthat makes more sense
that is my understanding
sorry if i missed that before
i think binarize exe could be circumvented if you really wanted to
that being said the file types are proprietary
could BI classify such Addons hacks or something?
well any decent dlc project could afford to spend £100k on circumventing it
adobe PDF, PSD etc for instance have been created by 3rd party programs before adobe helped out with SDKs
my feeling is that THIS would feature on the enforcement radar, as it deviates from the companys business model
same for FBX if i am not mistaken, software were exporting FBX before autodeks pushed on their own SDK
but we are going off topic here anyways
whereas a coupleof scripts for a Life server aren't worth bothering about
i was just wondering why if those guys break the EULA they are allowed to do so, which is definitely part of this topic
i guess it comes down to SCALE
possibly
or as you said it is and if situation and they are in the allowed zone
which may or may not be a very broad grey area
i'm very tempted to put out a game mesh for sale, see what happens
armake has it's own binarize
it's not 100% compliant yet, far from it
it can binarize both code and models, create a pbo with them, sign it with a valid key
well it's tempting indeed t osee what is legitimately permitted...
it's jus ta shame there's no easy way to work around Valve. as distrbuting game content without steam would be quite hard. but they generally take a large chunk of the proceeds on any game platform.
well non BI Binarize could then be possible, but since Armakes is not yet fully functional its not a very good option at the moment
separate launcher and data host for the dlcs
would also need system to deal with addon piracy at that point
doing something commerical outside BI framework for non-simple projects is still tricky and you usually would want the PR benefits they can deliver
for Lifers its probably not so much true - they have YTers, hype and their own communities for the attention
isn't it the other way around, it's simpler without steam? 😄
my point is its not that trivial not to violate any part of BI/A3 terms - open question if BI would act upon it. before A3 i would have assumed so (in OFP they did this once)
however the monetized server situation kinda gives me a different impression
you can license the engine if you so desire afaik
Got a community here using my missionfile that gives out points for helpful posts and "outstanding roleplay" which then can be traded in ingame items. From my side I gave them permission saying that I don't care as long as they obey monetization rules. However, now they also give 50 of these points for donating the first time and I'm unsure if they would actually break it by doing that 🤔 actually I'm happy they ask me 😅
@river spear there was already a court ruling. Programming Languages cannot be protected. So you can sell a file of SQF code all you want.
@faint nacelle since I think using Armas Binarize.exe cant(?) be circumvented armake is about 95% there.
yeah we discussed that above
Dedmen again posting before arriving at the bottom ^^
If a group can put together a set of tools themselves (i.e. hire mikero to make a non-BI toolset) they can set up an e-commerce platform and launch a dlc on it.
Asking for a custom binarize here, that would be huge. Until then, not realistically doable wihout binarize.
@hallow frigate they need to be a monetized server for that.
And.. Well. I know they need permission to use mods. But the FAQ doesn't talk about mission files. Do they count as mods?
@proud flicker Armake is already the custom open-source binarize. It can preprocess, binarize, pack pbo, sign. Which is essentially the entire toolchain you need.
It can convert to paa too I think. But there was a bug with them being too dark.
Interesting. So a packer with a custom made binarize.exe?
Binarize code is directly integrated. Like everything else
So theoretically you could make stuff without BI tools. But I don't know how that would go in court as you cannot really see if BI tools were used or not. And it's still a BI proprietary file format
How long would it take for BI to change the EULA to prevent this. 😄
not within arma3 lifespan anyways
@pliant oar https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1437089799 can you flag this please?
{
class YuraPetrov_helicopters
{
displayname="$STR_BLACKHAWKS_YURA_PETROV";
};
};``` - from config
and then the claim...
https://forums.bohemia.net/forums/topic/217785-uh-60_pack_by_robberjoe/?do=findComment&comment=3301555
UH-60_pack_by_RobberJoe
This pack contains different versions of UH-60 Blackhawk helicopter. I want to publish this mod because the community ...
Alright. Will tell them to think of smth else. thx 😊
robberJoe ... some folks have nerves
Didn't Yura's model of the Blackhawk get bought by BISIM or BI if I remember correctly?
Good work.
@wild stone
RobberJoe made them... Didnt see title? He just dont wanna be in credits... And those models are similar to YP but they dont. He just wants to publish his work 100% his work. YuraPetrov is dead for thousands years... He is my friend who make models
yeah right, that is why the strings is pointing to yura as strings shows above
I don’t understand why they wouldn’t have made even the slightest of attempts to make it less obvious
I remember DonbassCZ (same guy I think) kicking up on steam about it if I remember right
why they wouldn’t have made even the slightest of attempts to make it less obvious
wrong mindset ^^
RobberJoe is definitely trustworthy nickname
😄
You can contact Yura himself about this, he's still around. I don't remember his Steam, but he looks at his emails quite frequently. Lemme see if I find it
https://forums.bohemia.net/forums/topic/171108-people-profiting-from-donation-servers-with-ingame-rewards/?tab=comments#comment-2671880
Its just the beginning my friend. :( True words.. 4 years ago
RobertHammer stuff https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1286798168
( @blazing wyvern ? )
@echo orchid it was more my astonishment of their stupidity 😛
https://s.sqf.ovh/thunderbird_2018-07-10_20-52-05.png
That's something. Although I don't necessarily like the "until"
Wonder how much time they have now to follow.
They might just play the "Oh.. Didn't know because I didn't get that mail" game
Well at least that is something I guess
BI legal team found a piece of their vertebral column apparently
“revoked monetization approval ... untill ...“
So they'te getting it back...?
So one can f**k up and face no consequences. Awsome! Let's start selling mods until we get a slap on the fingers and then play the repeate game
/s
And he is right now in his stream talking about how people buy reserve slots. Which he cannot even do anymore..
They probably got a week or so from BI to stop monetizing
BI, you played yourself... once again...
I guess the time is about right to play the “remove all major mods from workshop / other sources for a week to get more focus on this“ card
Maybe they are lucky and psisyn say "ah.. screw it. We don't want monetization anyway"
LOOOL
and then they just keep going as they are...
@dull moon i have 220k total subs across all my public mods ready when you are!!
I'd say permanently remove mods until they are permanently demonetized
a statement like this (removing mods for a week) needs many mods, like CBA, CUP, RHS, TFAR, ACE, NiArms, JSRS, Enhanced _*, RH... as many as possible.
guess what shitstorm this would cause...?
@mint edge
A massive one, definitely would be an interesting watch
It needs to be a concerted effort across the board
exactly
im perfectly fine with screwing my server over for even a few weeks as long as something comes out of it 😒
especially if it hit's a weekend @fossil basalt
its just dumb that it would even need to come to that lol, nobody wants to be that guy that goes on strike
well... sure...
but take a look at the past of real life history
it only works like that
sadly
To paraphrase Martin Niemoller:
Because I was not a Socialist.
Then they came for the Trade Unionists, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Trade Unionist.
Then they came for the Jews, and I did not speak out—
Because I was not a Jew.
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak for me.```
the same could be applied to a lack of solidarity with modding (minus the Holocaust of course)
If you hold out because "my server will suffer", you will indeed suffer, in the long run, but not for the reasons you think.
Those are my words of wisdom for the night, off to bed. ☮
As a non-monetized server owner I support any action mod devs take to protect their IP tbh. Better that than we lose a whole load more mod devs from the community
Better that than we lose a whole load more mod devs from the community
a shit ton of devs are tired of this and consider quitting arma modding for good. tbh, i'm one of those
Please don
Don't
Most of us server owners really appreciate the work you guys do! Very much so. And most of us I'd say are pissed at these folks who provoke crises like these through their greed. Bohemia have to do the right thing here
one big deficit is the lack of information for the enduser. it's not like the information isn't there, but it's kinda hard to find it. i'm not a programmer or such, but i would say it's a nobrainer for devs to add a checkbox to the publisher like i have read all information about mod publishing on the workshop and hereby confirm that all content in this item is either mine, or i have written permission by the original autor. violating this will ban my steam account from playing this arma copy. [link to all needed information]
Get them to infiSTAR global ban them 😉
same goes for monetization...
illegal monetization (not approved): 4 week steam ban for the owners of the server
legal monetization but without mod autor permission: revoke of approval and also 4 week steam ban
repeat offenders: full steam ban
¯_(ツ)_/¯
like the french revolution... whoever did not comply got his head cut off
(ok, a bit drastic, but you get the idea)
i know, controlling and enforcing this takes a f**king huge efford and also menpower, but this is some basic stuff BI should have thought about before even consider to allow monetization.
also steam workshop. i love the workshop for mod distribution, and i was thankful we got it. but on the other hand, the lack of mechanisms for autors to protect their ip is just awful. sure, we have the posibility to DMCA a reupload, but what's next?
a guy get's DMCAed, his item removed, but 5 days later he reuploads the same shit without consequences....
all advice we get from BI and Valve is: get a lawery
¯_(ツ)_/¯
ohohoh... i need to stop... my pulse is rising and i'm about to cross the "not more than 25 DMCAs a day" rule from Valve...
Most of us server owners really appreciate the work you guys do!
the thing is, i'm not even actively modding anymore... my time is very limited, and i'm sort of wasting it with filing DMCAs, moving against illegal monetization (as far as possible) and just do witchhunting.
my last commit to our repository was 19-04-2018, and before that 20-12-2017...
i'm tired...
@paper prawn
The only solution is to make Bohemia and Steam notice. Mod devs need to stand together on this. We've seen this before... Do not want to have the same thing happen as then or for it to happen again!
i'm very reluctant to instigate a strike on steam as we'd lose our hard-won subscribers
however i would be happy to help write a letter to bohemia, which couldbe signed by all the main mod teams - if we get 50 or so on the list, wit ha subscriber number next to each one, maybe they would pay some attention?
happend before
and if that falls on deaf ears, a strike might be in order
Uro already wrote a letter and the outcome was like "we acknowledge the problem, stay tuned"
...
@olive sparrow
you are on the AMA discord, you can read it there
the outcome was, that BI wrote a note in some sitrep for users to respect the autors rights...
It is advised to collectively try to reach Bohemia peacefully before taking action. I agree with the letter route, perhaps posted and retweeted among many users, communities can also solicit their players to join the cause. Taking action, without everyone's agreement and cohesion, can only cause a sporadic misunderstood statement. 1 letter from 1 person is not enough. 1 letter from many people, many retweetes etc can be something more effective imo. Being drastic like that, no matter how big the lack of communication with Bohemia is, is not the ideal route.
ah ok chris 😦
Wouldn't lose me as an Unsung subscriber
my main suggestion i guess is to produce some very clear and concise points, with substantive (practical) actions
@errant drum
it wasn't just 1 letter by 1 person, it was a letter signed by many mods
i can't publish it here
as much as i would like to
See it like this: I have a big community, 6000 people on my discord and more than 2-300 new unique players joining my servers. If I have to close my servers for a day, a weekend or even a week, I could yes, join the cause, but what would that do? It could help it, but players who are ignorant about the matter will just lose interest and don't care. The good communities can easily rack up numbers to spread a louder message "threatening" to close/lose the servers because modders are tired. Point being is, don't involve only modders. Use communities, because at the end of the day modders, communities and players are what make Arma.
@dull moon and I'm saying this because for example, the letter you mentioned. Is probably known to a small circle, and that's the effect it had in general, none, at least from a community or player perspective.
Never forgot the support you mod devs have from those of us in the community and the joy you have brought us!
very good points
@errant drum
those are indeed good points
It could help it, but players who are ignorant about the matter will just lose interest and don't care.
same goes for both sides. "i'm playing on an illegal monetized server with ripped content... i got my reserved slot, i couln't care less about that."
it's not about targeting the playerbase ur subscribers, it's about targeting those who fuck shit up.
my view is a bit extreme, but as we say in german: wo gehobelt wird, fallen späne
or in more known quote: you can't fight a war without casualties
i'm well aware that an action like this means loss of subscribers and a shitstorm
ok, then i got you wrong. sry
What I am concerned about is that we could potentially rack more numbers to spread the message from players, communities and mods all together
Yeah, agreed completely with Adam
Than just having a small click take it on themselves and leaving the rest ignorant of the facts
Like we want to help you
Let's organize, let's spread the message.
Don't do it alone.
I would never have run an ARMA3 server had it not been for the mods...
Would have stayed on ARMA2 to this day
ok, so imagine the msg would spread all over the globe with an hge ammount of sympathy, what will the violaters think/do?
It's not about what they will do
It's about us creating that new point of communication that over the year we failed to, because it has always been a small amount of people getting pissed and nothing done about it
Bohemia are the only ones who can do something. So write an open message to Bohemia signed by major mod devs threatening to remove the mods from Steam (not from your own sites). Give a delay before doing so. Make it public
And hey at least we can say we tried
Use every available means to get the message out there. We in the community can help if we have something to forward
I DO NOT WANT THIS SHITE TO HAPPEN AGAIN. BEEN THROUGH IT ONCE ALREADY!
Who?
They have an A3L and Exile server
just google psisyn and go to his website, all his server info is there
@paper prawn
from my pov it doesn't matter if the letter is public or not. like i said, we already sent one to BI, sort of signed by the major 5 and others. we also got a response, a long response, containing some good ideas and stuff. but nothing really happend. to breake it down: we got plans, stay tuned... that's all
@errant drum
as much as i like your idea about new stance on communication and handling this subject, it will fail... again...
before i even started to file DMCAs i tried the pollite way: talking to the guys first, clarifying the matter. some, like really only a hand full of guys followed my wishes and talked in the right manner to me, but the majority was like "fuck you, we do as we want". at some point it ended in threatening of physical violence and even murder. this was the point i quit playing nice. so much for my experience with "talking first"
PsiSyn Exile is 8.26.94.42 Port: 2302
and talking about psi, that's the best live example we have right now
u ca nsee on here they are selling reserved slots
PsiSyn Lakeside A3L is 158.69.120.213:2302
that's the next thing... they got their approval removed and are still monetizing... like WTF
¯_(ツ)_/¯
sadly, words mean literaly nothing anymore in this world
i'm going to bed now, my ulcerated stomach is ordering me to stop it for today
1 sec @soft egret
abuse@ovh.ca
host company for both of his servers - if you email them with a DMCA request they will follow it through and his server will be shut down within 7 days of request being sent.
ns551496 is the machine that he is hosted on at OVH - quote this in the email.
IP's of the servers abusing content
158.69.120.213 - ns521144.ip-158-69-120.net
https://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/ABUSE3956-ARIN
abuse@ovh.ca
142.44.143.17 - ns551496.ip-142-44-143.net
https://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/ABUSE3956-ARIN
abuse@ovh.ca
8.26.94.42 - ns525476.ip-8-26-94.net
https://whois.arin.net/rest/poc/IPADD5-ARIN
ipaddressing@level3.com
because content regulations are different in Canada so i would contact this email
based in Ireland
https://www.ovh.ie/abuse/
Abuse- OVH
Report of abuse and illegal content.
and they deal with Canada mainly
those are many one seconds 😉
End of the day, Bohemia is not enforcing the terms of the APL-SA license... maybe you need a license that will be enforced?
If they won't enforce the APL-SA license then what use is it?
WHO will enforce it and HOW...
that's a major point in all this
Exactly... that's why something has to be done to persuade Bohemia to enforce this license. Otherwise good luck with getting people to mod DZSA - which they need
Or ARMA4
I also just got his account closed at another major server provider
so he won't be getting hosted or sponsoredby them again.
@soft egret hit up OVH with an email tomorrow
we'll just hit every server host he uses.
with a polite message / DMCA
oh, ok... this doesn't just sound like a battle, more like a full grown war.
i like it! 😄
Make War not ARMA?
is this a new Arma gamemode?
re-check my post above - changed tack slightly - hit the irish office for the server host, as the yare more likely t oresolve it quicker (EU law etc)
I have a very good adviser on this stuff lol
who?
ok, no... pls don't trigger me. if i also start to hit DMCAs on the provider, it will be a full day job
let's not drag him into the light
there are not that many arma server providers.
i'm good friends with several of the bigger companies
waiting for email from provider X saying: please do not file more then 25 DMCAs a day, pleeeeezzz
so they won't host him, or anyone else we report to them as abusing IP
no they will just bill you for that
it can be more simple. i just reported him to a friendly company who was a sponsor, and now they are not.
@dull moon I was talking the other day about this
Most of the server owners use ovh
And u can super easy dmca ovh stuff
let's get on good terms with all of the major server companies
and we can sort this guy out once and for all
migrating his servers is gonna cause him pain
Rob, that is actually a fucking good idea.... why fighting the symtoms if you can get rid of the cancer at it's roots
hosts in dmca heaven, aka Easter Island servers
and if each time he migrates, sets up shop, lets his fans know, and redoes al lhis databases andwhatnot, then bam! he is closeddown again and has to migrate. after 3-4 times he won't bother any more.
See that's the spirit, finally some collab instead of ranting
Although I said this the other day everyone ignored me cause the rant was real 
it helps to have some friends who run server hosting companies. the ycan explain easily how to sort things out
@errant drum
sorry i missed that
@faint nacelle no kappa in my phrase, thought it wasn't necessary 😂
kinda tough keeping track on here while at work
this is all part of a long term strategy to nail these ripping ne'er do wells
if we do sort out this collective approach to IP rights i nthe coming year, we'll have built up a bit of pull with the server hosts
Rob, hereby you are crowned as the server provider ambassador 😂
so in an idea lworld we can publis ha list of mods the ycan police - if the customer wants it installed, they have to tick a box saying they won't monetize it.
Still think that Bohemia needs to be on notice about the APL-SA...
i've already got one server host agreeing to pilot it
if it works, and he's a big host, then i know one other i can convince to add it too.
and we can also as a community if we rent servers, rent them or co-locate them with hosts who protect IP rights.
so we could make a list of "responsible hosting companies"
kinda like "responsible contractors" employed by local government etc
Still doesnt fix the issue of bohemia not enforcing it's own policies
Bohemia has to enforce the APL-SA or remove it
BI has other worries, let's sort out this current offender together.
we can nail the servers, and just keep nailing them, while making the issue clear to each provider
Roger that
see, if we had a decent warchest to use we could file a class action (a group of mod makers) and sue him for damages.
Set up an NLF Mod Dev page 😉
While I agree with Eggbeast's approach at the moment, the issue with what you are thinking is that it only deals with a situation until a mod is removed. What you need to do is persuade BI to permanently remove monetization if someone uses mods that prohibit it... you may have won a battle but not the war. There still may only be one way to persuade Bohemia to do the right thing - but you have time to organize for that now. And the approach of building relationships with server providers to blacklist IP violators is a good thing to tbh
Has anyone considered going to Twitch about him?
pretty sure it's breaching section 9 of the TOS
And YouTube
I guess one thing I do not understand is Bohemia produce the APL-SA license... which says no monetization. Why do they allow servers on their monetized list that have APL-SA licensed mods... That does not make sense
because those servers usually bring more people to the game
which requires them to buy a copy of arma
as they forget that they're killing the modding community, which is the only reason people still play the game
Then you need a new license since Bohemia is not enforcing the one that provided for mod devs
And 100% agreed. If this ends up like the last time then I'm done with ARMA too. And DZSA
Bohemia almost shot themselves in the foot with making arma 3 all futurey, and they seem unwilling to admit that it's the high quality mods that have allowed it to succeed at all
100%. My servers do not use vanilla A3 military assets at all (except for a few handguns)
"A contributer to the TFR code named Dedmen has shown distaste towards our mistake of not requesting monetization permission for TFR or our server for months now." So Dedmen is the problem... WTF?
bloody hell, he's using this to create a panic buy situation
that greedy bastard
The store items will be removed when Repentz is back to do so from his vacation
What?
"The original creator of TFR (NKey) has no issue with the monetization of his mod from people, but also is not willing to say "I permit" or "I don't permit", so alas, since Dedmen did indeed contribute SOME code (I honestly don't know how much, but NKey is still the person who made the core TFR code I'm sure), he gets to decide who does and doesn't monetize the mod. If he doesn't like you, you're shit out of luck." Da fuq?
Oopsie owie.
And no, I said >towards our mistake of not requesting monetization permission for
It was our mistake
I admitted that
I mean how is that false? It is up to Dedmen
He doesn't like us
He released the mod under the APL-SA no-monetization did he not?
that's cool, so that's that
Yes, I don't know the ins and outs of what that means, not going to even lie
wait
was it no monetization?
I'm pretty sure it's not, is it?
APL-SA is no monetization by default... first page of the license!
How do A3PL monetize then?
Permission from the mod dev probably...
Did you... Follow our last conversation, at all?
I talked to Kane about it and he said NKey gave permission
No need to be condescending fella.
a3pl, alrp, cg, I can go on
But that's what I meant G-Dog
it seems like a direct target
If permission is not given, that's that
nothing can be done
if there's anything you're upset by in my write up, let me know and I can try change it, I tried to just explain the situation in full
that's all.
Just seems like you're blaming Dedmen for your mistake... which if an honest mistake seems to be a shite thing to do. That's all
I'm not
I admitted the mistake
But ultimately it was Dedmen who witch hunted, not NKey
Witch hunted... hmm...
Yeah, pretty much
Getting an attitude vibe here
I'm not giving attitude
Witch hunted? He's simply enforcing his license.
I mean he is gathering other mod creators to demonitize us
I'm just giving you my opinion
Good. You guys are happy when the shoe's on the other foot aren't you?
NKey didn't seem to give a fuck about his licence for years thou, let's be honest XD
no mod creators are being gathered to target everyone
so why is alrp, a3l, and cg not having these issues?
Don't worry, I'm sure Dedmen will get to them too.
protecting?
I am just here to understand why you guys cant just become civil and keep this game alive, being like this is only killing the small player base that arma 3 has left
Anyhow, Dedmen is simply enforcing the license of TFAR.
civil....
And that's fine, monetization is removed
civil is not making money off other people's hard work
all good
LOL. Travis, I'd rather your server died than we all lost the great mods that keep ARMA alive tbh
YES
^
that's the poinyt
it's nothing to do with money
it's about morals
which are not being demonstrated
I don't know man
If I make a free asset, I would want it to be used.
You act like we were just giving modders/Bohemia the middle finger the entire time
why would you try to takedown a server that is day in and out promoting the mod even more?
You gave Demen the finger for months according to your own words
well you clearly didn't read any of the terms of use before you did it all
Stupid mistake
"A contributer to the TFR code named Dedmen has shown distaste towards our mistake of not requesting monetization permission for TFR or our server for months now."
but I legit didn't realize permission was required
Has shown distaste... And, yeah, right!
Yes, I learnt that this has been an issue for months just a few weeks ago
So why not contact the server owner personally?
why did Dedmen not contact us instead of complaining on a Discord?
@carmine folio And that's cool. But as a creator, you have the ability to attach certain conditions to how your mod is used. Arma public share alike is standard practice.
Your message basically say "he's a cunt, we have to deal with it"... not gonna get much sympathy on that one
stupid mistake is the first time you do it, not checking all your mods afterwords is ignorance with a purpose
when we found out which mods were violating, we removed them
all you have to use is words
@scarlet osprey I contacted Repentz months ago on behalf of Toadie2K about the inclusion of HLC into your modpack.
which these mod creators are not doing
Well then maybe you should take more accountability for what you put your name to
Months ago
I apologize if Repentz is not cooperative with you @tawny sentinel
but that is Repentz, not me
I had no knowledge of this.
I guess so @frail flint, I can agree with that
Again, apologies for that Volvo, but like I said, I didn't know of this ever happening.
Okay, so you simulatinously claim ignorance, but at the same time say that creators did not attempt to contact people who run the server with your name on it, when I have done exactly that to no avail. Is Repentz not someone who does work on your server? Is it exclusively you who would should contact, despite you saying you are no longer involved in running the community? Surely you must see the absurd amount of irony in this.
And they have prior: About 2 weeks ago, you might have noticed the store section for Exile was removed from our site. This was due to Chernarus 2035 and another addon not allowing us to monetize, Bohemia requested that we stop monetizing it, so we did. Exile was operating purely based off of server donations at this point. With our total server costs looking around $500 ($150 for Exile box, $150 for Life, and $195 for website, repo and TS), that's fine, the Life server would cover the unreliability of donations.
The argument you seem to be using is entirely circular since it depends on facts that you yourself have disputed.
I mean you said you messaged months ago, I wish you did contact me.
Repentz certainly does have a way of ignoring people, most of those people come to me after being ignored.
So two weeks ago you knew...
Knew what?
So yeah, that sucks, and I do certainly hold some responsibility, but I did not ignore you ultimately, someone else did
And Volvo messaged a while ago and your message said that Dedmen had been repeatedly on to you
I mean because you're placing blame on me
for something I didn't do
like what?
I'm apologizing for something I didn't even do
as I said earlier, and you agreed
If someone is an "community director", is it unreasonable for me to expect him to forward concerns to the other parts of the development team?
you're responsible if your name is on it
It is reasonable, but if they don't, how is that my fault?
Again... we would rather see a server die a death than lose our mods! The mods keep ARMA alive not you!
I'm not blaming you individually.
You should should know what people you work with are doing, even at a base level
it's basic corporate responsibility
And tbh... that was one of the shittiest apologies I've ever seen
I just dont know why this community cant just be a happy family
More a "Dedmen is a bastard and caused all this" than an apology
Travis... cause our community was almost destroyed last time
I just apologized to Flying personally, if it's an apology you wish me to add, I'm on it.
And we're not going through that again
But I am saying that it's unreasonable for you to somehow put blame on the creator community due to your staff not bringing attention to matters that should have been forwarded to the appropriate people. It's an management issue, not the fault of the creator community who is "witch hunting" you.
I again apologize to Dedmen for not seeking out permission at an earlier date, ignorance isn't a very good excuse for this, but it's all I have.
Added to the post
"our community"?
@carmine folio I'm not sure you're aware but a large number of significant contributors to the game has left over the last few years due to exactly this sort of conduct
Don't apologize to me. You have no reason to. Apologize to Toadie2K on Twitter and make sure HLC is not included in your modpacks. If you're feeling extra sorry, she has a patreon you can contribute to.
Not yours obviously. Mine is the ARMA3 community (and ARMA2, our good buds)
this and other intellectual rights issues
Ever wondered why it took so long for great mods to be on Steam... and why some still are not... cause of this bullshit behaviour!
If Toadie wishes to personally reach out to me, I can give some money through PP, I'd rather not through Patreon
...
Just LOL
It shouldn't be on the content creator to reach to you
you should be begging forgiveness
I never said it was on them, I just don't want to use Patreon
I don't think you understand what I'm saying. It's not an transaction.
for making money off someone else's hard work
They just do not get it. They do not think that they did anything wrong...
I just offered money to the mod creator, no?
I don't get you guys, I really don't
Exactly
I know you don't
@soft egret
Don't conflate me with the others. They do not speak for me.
Sorry, all the white names hurt my eyes
Right so you get mad when people make money off your work, but when money is offered you deny it?
Response to your post on your forum from an admin: I mean, dedmens point is completely invalid, he wants/wanted us to downgrade the TFR (TFAR) version to before he contributed, but it's a 'trap', he has been contributing since 2015 (https://i.imgur.com/zjiQCCN.png), which means it's an extremely outdated, and probably broken version. Not just that, if we were to go to an earlier version he'd probably just say the same thing "I contributed to this version, i want it removed", the rest of ArmA literally HATES life servers (even though we're the ones keeping it semi-alive), which is the most triggering thing, they're literally witch-hunting us on the ArmA Discord, it's pathetic.
I seen it G-Dog, that's his opinion, which he's entitled to
Anyway, whoever contacted Repentz on behalf of Toadie (I forgot your name sorry), feel free to get her to reach out to me (takes 2 minutes) if she wants to. Have a good night guys.
That's alright. My intent is not to convey that "If you give money to Toadie, she will do X", but rather that "If you want to, you can apologize to her on Twitter and make sure HLC is not included in your mod pack, and if you want, she has a patreon you can contribute to, but not under the guise of any extra benefits for your server or whatever". The last part is completely voluntary.
@paper prawn I am glad you are a active member of our community, make sure to update your mods!
And I am entitled to express my opinion, which is to support the mod developers who have made ARMA3 what it is and prevent anyone from pissing them off so much that they stop contributing. Which they have done before... so many good devs lost last time
I'm not on your community @carmine folio
LOL. Wait one
I believe he is referencing the whole debacle with Caden in 2014-ish.
What was the issue with caiden?
Witch hunt intensifies
As I can see, a3l still uses tfr.
And Dedmen will get to them too.
Many Arma 3 servers use TFR
Like I said.
How do you know?
Witch hunt implies people haven't done anything wrong
Yep, that's the one Volvo
Because I know Dedmen is consistent in what he does?
thats not what it means
...
In that he claims people stop using a mod that he wrote a couple of lines of code for back in 2015
Lol
it comes from the medieval era when people were accused of being witches
Witch hunt meaning that it seems like you are intentionally trying to fuck us over.
Keep digging the hole guys...
seeing you keep refreshing the page every 5 secs
you would be considered one of those.
You obviously have a very nuanced view of licenses and how Arma public share alike works @supple abyss
Mod devs will be back in the morning and looking through the thread
Sure im just saying Dedmen hasnt done shit for the mod
...
Keep digging and the hole will get deeper
Then you are hilariously wrong.
Am i? I believe Nkey made the mod
And that Dedmen wrote a couple of lines of code back in 2015
Have a look at what he's done
Sure, he's done stuff
But honestly, he hasn't done as much as NKey
The last thing he did in 2017 was write 2 lines of code and change one
NKey is the main contributor, why is a guy that has pushed 28 commits the one that determines who can use the mod?
well he's most likely done more than anyone in your community, so I'd say he has a right to say you can't use it
Latest commit was * 7 hours* ago
Not my point.
Nkey should make the decision and if he doesnt care about either option then why make it an issue?
Is this just the community coming in here to try and tarnish someone who is responsible for commits in the TFAR github. Cause again, keep digging guys
100%, NKey should make the choice
Dedmen didnt upload the mod and he sure as shit hasnt done as much for it as Nkey
@paper prawn seems so
just saying, @supple abyss is not affiliated with us.
Dedmen is the current maintainer of TFAR, and as far as I know, he has the discretion to enforce the license.
@paper prawn i'm not sitting here and trying to diminish his rep, i'm just pointing out. He's not the sole creator of the mod, hence it should be up to NKey to make the choice, as he is the original creator
Yeah im not
so anything he says is from him
Im a concerned citizen 😛
but I appreciate having an open thought
I'd wait til NKey gets here cause given he allows Dedmen to commit github changes he may not really like what y'all are saying
I dont think he told Dedmen to witchhunt down servers and not allow them to monetize
And if you think that they don't talk to each other... well... I'd say you may be wrong
He is simply enforcing the license that the original creators had. As far as I know, he has not changed any parts of the license since becoming an developer.
I mean, we have attempted to reach the sole contributor of the mod but it seems he is very hard to get in contact with.
Again with witch-hunt.. I don't think that means what you think it means.
I mean, as @scarlet osprey stated, NKey essentially said he doesn't care, never said yes, never said no.
What?
I am seriously LMFAO at the stupidest response to this situation that could be imagined
@carmine folio I mean Nkey is from belarus the KGB might have shot him lmao
Never said no... was he asked?
Apparently, yes
No, he hasn't given any indications on what he thinks, because he doesn't know about this issue even existing.
Like they asked Toadie?
How can you give an opinion on something that you don't know exists?
The original creator of TFR (NKey) has no issue with the monetization of his mod from people, but also is not willing to say "I permit" or "I don't permit"
Or the SFP folks
Taken directly from PsiSyns post
Or the BNAE folks
Did Toadie enforce a license or has stated she has an issue with it? i wasnt aware
We're they asked
Because it's come to the creators attention.
...
what about all these small servers?
Its not im simply confused since if she hasnt stated she cares then does that imply that they must ask for permission to use all mods?
think that through for a minute
its not about the money I thought?
Because no-one else does that
TFAR, SFP, MELB, BNAE... not just one dev
and you'll answer your own question
@supple abyss Yes, because that's the agreement that you agree to when going under Bohemia interactive's monetized servers list.
"We have gotten away with this for so long, why can't we continue???"" Was that really just asked?
And this thread cannot be erased... and that will not reflect well on your community
I guess so
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jl3962mdzFM - hmm @5:30
@tawny sentinel Can you link somewhere that states that
Id like to see before i trust you on that one
Coming from toadie?
Go read the monetization license.
link?
You may, but ONLY if you have proper permission from all of the authors of such mods. Monetizing without it contravenes our licenses.```
He sent you the link
Cannot be clearer than that
Well i guess its not an excuse then
license is given then people add things
TFAR has been in since their original server in Nov of 2017
Mods are added without the approval of BI, they have no part of making sure you agree to the license you signed and making sure you keep your part of it.
Well i cant wait to see Dedmen so after ALRP and A3L then
if they knew it had such a license and he is going after people dont you think they would check that
when they applied, they told BI they had permission
Simple FAQ... 12 items... one of which is On my server I am using mods created by other people. May I get approval to monetize? You may, but ONLY if you have proper permission from all of the authors of such mods. Monetizing without it contravenes our licenses.
It is not difficult
ok
except it apparently is.
BI do not babysit your FTP server to make sure you agree to the agreement you signed.
I still dont see why Dedmen gets to decide and not Nkey
because you are using his intellectual property
Your right they dont, only people from this discord do
I guess they read it as when we apply we have to agree but afterwards we can add what we like...?
Its not his though its Nkey's Property
No...
He has created the majority of it and is the publisher
god it's like playing chess with a pigeon
On my server I am using mods created by other people. May I get approval to monetize?
You may, but ONLY if you have proper permission from all of the authors of such mods. Monetizing without it contravenes our licenses. Whatever bois, I do what I want
no matter what you do they still shit on the board and knock over the peices
The questions isnt whether or not its allowed its whether or not Dedmen should decide
Nkey is the main creator and the publisher is he not?
Did dedmen work on the mod?
W.T.F.?
Then dedmen gets to decide
He commits the releases on Github you moron!
NKey commits the releases
He is part of their dev team!
pigeon chess
Really? so if i get access from Nkey to the Github and post one line of code shouldnt i just take down all arma 3 servers?
ahahaha
As Travis states Nkey commites the one the server uses
so if one contributor has a issue they decide if the mod should go poof?
Commit permission implies a significant trust or involvement in the project.
Not Dedmen
i'm sure if you could provide anything of value, you'd understand why this is an issue
Not poof. Just can't monetize
http://radio.task-force.ru/en/
The official Maintainers NKey and Dedmen are exempt from this rule.
@errant drum My sides have left the observable universe
Keep fucking digging the hole guys - maybe this will even make Bohemia notice
The fact of the matter is that Nkey Commits the one the server uses and Dedmen Commits the new one
are you saying you are ded.... men?
O O F
how is a server suppose to survive without monetization? sell online lemonade?
Lmao
ROFL
You could sell kiddie porn to chapo
a server cost money
overviewFootnote = "<br /><br /><t color='#999999'>This content is under APL-SA License.<t />";
APL-SA License
@mint edge @errant drum These guys don't know how a server SURVIVES without monetization...
it's called having a community
Noncommercial - You may not use this material for any commercial purposes.
Why not just get permission for the mods you use... or don't use ones you do not have permission for. Then you are golden
big ben you look pretty buff
you donate to maintain, no special stuff
whats your workout plan?
pigeon chess
what do you mean?
I eat midgets. Good protein
Oh I thought you eat servers while you claim them
Got a feeling PsiSyn may regret sending his minions here by the morning if this continues
Minions?
you are aware that the longest running servers are non-monetized
I dont even play there
My mod allows monetization. I just respect the rights of mod makers that don't wish their mods monetized.
because they're kept alive by a more stable player base
I don't think he was mentioning you specifically
people wonder why mod creators have been alienated
Magic
<--- Has a small A3 Community discord, but also does not monetize
Mike called you a tryhard Adam
What is the capital of Europe
England
^^^
💯
rule britannia plays faintly
@paper prawn who are you?
It's coming home!
he's who you should want to be
I've got my sources @hallow lark , I don't need google
isn't the capital like england or something
that city```
ROFL
That was painful
England is my fav city to live in
👀
Yikes
So, now this discussion (which achieved nothing btw!) has ended, do you guys think England is going to win the world cup?
Aaannnnddd this convo is done. Put a fork in it boyz
Eh
Bloody hell... Root's here... lock up your sons!
Croatia has had a good run
Whos Root?
Whos Root?
Root b gay
Hopefully you will never have to find out
Hey, what’re you saying I’m a nice guy
🤷♀️
That picture
lol
@hallow lark I am going to need that workout plan still
About 2 weeks ago, you might have noticed the store section for Exile was removed from our site. This was due to Chernarus 2035 and another addon not allowing us to monetize, Bohemia requested that we stop monetizing it, so we did. Exile was operating purely based off of server donations at this point. With our total server costs looking around $500 ($150 for Exile box, $150 for Life, and $195 for website, repo and TS), that's fine, the Life server would cover the unreliability of donations.```
Implying they had permission to monetize Exile from Eichi
195$ a month for website and TS, 150$ for a dedi for 1 server
Are those server in Saudi Arabia ?
it's a lot for a website, weirder that they're not using their server boxes to host their repo's as wel
@errant drum nah they must be in australia
@errant drum whois.domaintools.com 😛
Shhh
I'll keep your secret safe, don't you worry 😉
I'm guessing the unnamed mod that they did not have permission to run on their Exile server was Exile acer...
Well that was an interesting read


So, now that I've had to troll through the "but I didn't know" BS, let me be very clear:
Without EXPLICIT CONSENT from a mod maker (or Mod makers in the case of NKEY and Dedmen as well as others) you are PROHIBITED from monetising the work of others. Then and only then, with actual consent in hand, are you permitted to seek server monetisation approval from Bohemia.
Taken directly from the Server monitisation FAQ:
You may, but ONLY if you have proper permission from all of the authors of such mods. Monetizing without it contravenes our licenses.```
These have been the rules since DAY 1.
just finished reading of ^all that fuzz ... 
i don't get why you blame creative content makers to defend theirs own licenses protecting theirs work / rights ...
they not the ones who break the rules (of good behaviour, IP rights, licenses ... )
TL;DR for those catching up this morning in european timezones: The server hosting companies have been contacted directly with a DMCA against offending servers, since BI's action on it was very very mild. (And the offender seemed to just ignore the warning/threat and continued with monetization)
Not a bad idea actually
cant claim ignorance if you aren't ignorant. https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=116&v=gCE4WErcUIE < talks about how A3L didn't get permission to use TFAR - he knew the score and should have been on his 'team' from the start, there's no ignorance involved in this one particular instance.
Get them to infiSTAR global ban them I like that idea.. But that would mean infistar banning server owners from their own server 😄 That would hurt Infistar a lot.
@olive sparrow i'm very reluctant to instigate a strike on steam as we'd lose our hard-won subscribers Don't delete the item. Just upload a empty modfolder. Subscribers either stay.. Or go over to illegal reuploads.
We could make a petition. And add a popup in the Arma Main menu about it to lots of public mods. A petition with thousands of signers might be more incentive for BI.
And if we don't all do it the same way. People will have their main menu plastered with dozens of popups that they all have to click away manually.
Or maybe just add a general reminder for everyone. A message box that informs everyone about what you can/can't do on the steam workshop when they launch Arma. If BI doesn't wanna inform then we do it. And if users complain about it. Redirect them to BI.
@frail flint pretty sure it's breaching section 9 of the TOS You just need to watch half an hour of his stream to find something TOS violating. He yesterday said he'll unban someone on the lakeside server if he subscribes. That definetly sounds like that should be against TOS?
The original creator of TFR (NKey) has no issue with the monetization of his mod I know NKey's stance on this.
I talked to Kane about it and he said NKey gave permission Unlikely. Depends on how old A3PL is. NKey last gave monetiziation permission to a life server about 3 years ago.
@carmine folio I mean he is gathering other mod creators to demonitize us I'm telling other mod creators that you illegally use their stuff. I'd say that's fair.
Again.. It's funny how you are again trying to push everything onto me. I didn't do anything but report that you violated tons of rules. Also not only my Mod. It's not my fault that you can't read.
when we found out which mods were violating, we removed them Sure.. You removed them right away. Ofcause. That's why you can still monetize now right?
@scarlet osprey >I again apologize to Dedmen for not seeking out permission at an earlier date, ignorance isn't a very good excuse for this, but it's all I have. You should apologize to BI for breaking their rules. Not to me.
If Toadie wishes to personally reach out to me, I can give some money through PP Seriously? You're trying to buy your way out of this?
I mean, dedmens point is completely invalid, he wants/wanted us to downgrade the TFR (TFAR) version to before he contributed Incorrect. PsiSyn wanted to do that, not me. And I said "good luck with that" because you still need NKey's permission.
@carmine folio but then you say its not about the money so what is it? Follow the rules. Period.
@supple abyss In that he claims people stop using a mod that he wrote a couple of lines of code for back in 2015 You shouldn't talk if you don't know what you are talking about.
Witch hunt meaning that it seems like you are intentionally trying to fuck us over. You broke the rules dude. Not me. Also. I initially reported you because people told me about tons of other problems with you guys and I just wanted to help them. Which you can clearly see in my first message here about PsiSyn. "If you need more dirt on them, they are using TFAR without permission". This hasn't all started because of me. This has started because other mod makers were unhappy and I just wanted to help them.
@steady hare But honestly, he hasn't done as much as NKey That graph only shows master branch.... All development moves to 1.0 branch since mid 2016.
100%, NKey should make the choice He already did. I'm not deciding all this on my own you know..
I mean, as @PsiSyn stated, NKey essentially said he doesn't care, never said yes, never said no. incorrect. I know exactly what NKey wrote to BI. His last answer was "Look at all their past and current violations of your rules and decide on your own if they should be allowed to use monetize this mod. For all versions > 0.9.7.3 I think dedmen is legible to decide."
Which... Considering all your violations was kind of a "no" between the lines. But BI replied back and wanted a clear answer. I guess NKey didn't have time to write back yet.
@tawny sentinel read above. He does know.
@supple abyss Its not im simply confused since if she hasnt stated she cares then does that imply that they must ask for permission to use all mods? Exactly. You need to ask for permission explicitly. It's not allowed by default.
And yeah. Thanks for reminding me. I'll get in contact with ALRP and RealLifeRPG right away. Don't know what A3L is. I will do the same as with PsiSyn. Look at their mod repository. And if I see violations I'll report them right away. And if not then I'll tell them nicely to request permission for TFAR.
Really? so if i get access from Nkey to the Github and post one line of code shouldnt i just take down all arma 3 servers? That's really not at all how it works @supple abyss Someone who changed a line and being the official maintainer are very different roles.
@carmine folio how is a server suppose to survive without monetization? sell online lemonade? really idiotic comment.. You can monetize if you follow the rules. Nothing stopping you.
With this whole endevour you are again showing how ineligible you are to run any monetized server. Instead of acknowledging your mistakes. You instead go the "cause panic and personally attack the guy you think is responsible" route.
Thanks for the TL;DR AFTER I read everything 🤦
Also.. Good morning 👋
It's really sad to see all the talk of people where who don't actually know what they are talking about.. Weird enough they are mostly on the PsiSyn side.
Btw.. Nkey can still decide if he wants to give you permission to monetize older TFAR versions.. He get's informed about everything that's going on. And digging yourself your own grave now might not be the best idea if you intent to return to running TFAR on a monetized server some day.
@soft egret if you keep finding MBG building stuff in there: Its not for monetization, so feel free to flag it for that as well. I checked the PsiSyn a3s and it does have all that in there.
Hey guys. Check #communities_arma3 HLC, RH, TFAR, MBG
@proud flicker Thanks for the recap, my scroll wheel started bursting into flames 👌
Just seen the VSM thread again, looks like people were investigating while it was locked
see all the talk of people where who don't actually know what they are talking about.. Weird enough they are mostly on the PsiSyn side
well obviously his fans/minions will act on his statement about "you bad boyz"
you shouldnt forget that guy makes his living from streaming
I think I need to go back to modding OFP. None of this crap exists for that platform. 😠
(plus all his shady and likely illegal behavior he has shown in the past)
@soft egret
Get them to infiSTAR global ban them I like that idea.. But that would mean infistar banning server owners from their own server smile That would hurt Infistar a lot.
Well. Repentz is global'd. But theres an option to whitelist people, or not use the global banlist altogether, so "banning server owners" isn't necessarily an issue.
wow looks like its at the moment very extrem with the violations, shame on those minions who support those guys who are doing the violations.
at the end of the day only a big PR problem will have BI and more so Valve force to act, or to give them a bigger financial interest to the current additional copies sold for A3 (ie paid mods, premium third party DLC)
We do have the option to shut off their license though, which we actually have in the past.
oh wow
just checked cg_emswheelchair.pbo
which is in every a3l modpack
it just contains sfp_wheelchair.p3d
😦
or maybe to go that route with a new platform to sell mods without BI/Valve - tricky to pull off though
And easy to block from BI's side. I dont believe that it would go far.
Nah, wouldn't work to well
😂
Hiya Mittens
Issa clusterfuck innit?
I've spent like an hour. How are you so quick?
class sfp_wheelchair: B_Quadbike_01_F {
author = "CG Life";
vehicleclass = "cg_emswheelchair";
crew = "C_man_1";
driverAction = "sfp_wheelchair_driver";
:/
🤔
I managed to catch it at the start, I haven't gone overly far back though
Well. Lots of upcoming work for SFP guys I guess
Repentz is
read em before ban pls
The audactiy behind that. Thats the real shit. They know full well what they are doing here.
But we know its true lol
I'm extremely interested to see where this all ends up going
And to think I'll be handing them the basis for an 80s life mod. 🤢
Interesting.. If I log in on PsiSyn.com.. I cannot use the forum anymore. Every page redirects to https://i.imgflip.com/s9mmv.jpg
😂
Clearly interested in resolving the situation, then. 😃
Can you view it in incognito? You were probably b&
logged out works
Ah
log in 😉
Just wanted to clarify the lies people are answering there.. But I guess it's not supposed to be ¯_(ツ)_/¯
sadly there is now way like scripting, mod stop working if is life server ? 😄
Anyways. Yea. The infistar global ban option isn't really effective as you said, but only because of the reason i outlined above
@scenic swallow That'd be a legitimate laugh though
Could you imagine the amount of tickets and people asking why they're banned?
I mean Mittens, Repentz is already global'd
Borris, it kinda is
🤣
Since alot of people are using the tonic framework 🤔
I remember he is
I fucking hate that ticket system dont get me started
oof
Maybe if we ban lewis mid stream :^)
I'd be dying of laughter
He'd then be restricted to his servers or seeking whitelisting beforehand
SURPRISE
I do wonder if that'd be bit of a wake up call
It would probably take a few minutes to realise what happened and how to fix it too 😂
iirc They already whitelisted globalled people 😛
Yea, but hed be newly listed, which means theyd have to add the uid to the array and restart the server
Don't get too #offtopic_arma. Want others to see the more important talk up top ^^
@proud flicker if it were easy to block from BI side, why arent they doing it so far?
That is the question we are wondering about.
https://forums.bohemia.net/forums/topic/217488-project-zenithvsm/?do=findComment&comment=3298773
VSM mods are not allowed anywhere anymore. Beware
@soft egret Bit tired to catch up, but I assume based on that re-direct you put in some action on the hosting side?
I didn't do anything yet. But it seems like other people did it for me
Welp, find them and join them.
It's clear they like to weasel their way out of any strikes. Might as well pile in the evidence! ^-^
Already have new stuff ready to report them. Only way for them to circumvent this is to go through every single one of their mods they use and get permission. If they don't I'll report them immediately after they are allowed to monetize again. If that happens someday.
What if they continue monetizing without permission to monetize?
Then BI has to block their server.
Has BI ever done such a thing?
They said they won't stop till repentz comes back from vacation.. But I doubt that he is the only one who can disable a single web page.
They already got a red card from BI now. I guess when they get the next yellow card right after they are back. BI might finally shut them down for good...
If your asking how far will it go
I.. Don't remember hearing directly about a server that was shutdown from BI.
But I remember seeing screenshots of that battleye disabled message.
Already posted before
aw
Am I the only one with a monetized server who has gotten permission?
Although I only use one mod.
@echo orchid you should check that Task Force Leviathan thread of BI forums, left something interesting there for ya
Crap it works for me
sorry. Closing and reopening browser fixed it ¯_(ツ)_/¯
But reloading didn't
That's probably the same problem that BI forum has with imgur embedded images
Ah okay
Oh why am I not surprised.
@robust abyss are people allowed to monetize your mods? Your hat one specifically?
It was the M1151 GMV if I recall correctly
lol best part was how do we pay for our servers if we can't monetize.....We have over 8 servers, none monetized so um yea
update on the PsiSyn Lakeside modpack i downloaded last night:
- bnae
- csa38
- HAFM
- HLC
- JBAD
- MBG
- MELB
- RH
- SFP
- SMD
- TFAR
¯_(ツ)_/¯
I just found half a dozen other mods that explicitly don't allow monetization.. I'm making a list.
HOLY SHIT... now i know why this name @carmine folio rings a bell... Obamacare guy... OFC!
he was reporting another server to me for... guess what... ILLEGAL MONETIZATION
omfg... the irony...
regarding action BI have done against abuse, they used to go after server owners paypals and get them disabled for copyright abuse (or something like that). They stopped and personally have only heard them disabling BE
@dull moon isn't combining the mods like that against some of the mods licenses?
Also, if a course of action would be to temporarily remove those mods from SW, that would have no effect on the servers combining them into a modpack right?
CUP for example doesn't allow reuploads in any form to the workshop, dropbox, googledrive, ect
so technically, if one decides to reupload CUP to another platform (if actions would have be taken that CUP isn't avaliable on the WS temporarily), i could and would DMCA strike them on other platforms
cups Terrains is apl-sa? pretty sure u can reupload that (maybe not steam but private hosting)
https://forums.bohemia.net/forums/topic/180829-united-states-air-force-2015/ That one? SGT Fuller was last online 18 hours ago. You can probably reach them there
cool, thank you
@stark mulch terrains yes. But not vehicle/weapon/units these are http://cup-arma3.org/license
beauty, thank you
https://i.imgur.com/3HUUMUs.png
[...]
I
LITERALLY
DO
NOT
HAVE
TIME
FOR
THIS
!!!
😨
Publish the list and let other authors DMCA them for their stolen stuff. Then you have less work later ^^ I'm sure most of these also have tons of other stuff
I haven't dared searching for our stolen wheelchair yet 🙃
someone got a link to the WS checker
@dull moon but but... I need to create an dummy steam workshop item then 😮
or is there filename search yet?
I'll just borrow one of the lifepacks then 😄
but i thought SFP is already on the WS
you can go for a deepscan, loocking for that one P3D only
Download it from psi's repo, reup it on workshop for the scan 😄
😂
funny enough psisyn doesn't use our wheelchair
just our bas90 (airbase systems using civilian roads) and objects
they have some other broken wheelchair
uh, workshop crawler has removed the file reupload list?
That's on the server "ALRP" I believe, he hasn't had his own server since 6 months ago or so I believe.
@river spear is it possible to search for a pbo filename somehow on the crawler?
someone has reupload some of my/torndeco's content the shitbags!
Do I have to contact steam thorugh the DMCA form, or can I just directly email someone there?
@keen trout Yes, but only if that file is on the workshop sadly
it is 😃
I couldn't find the list of file reuploads anymore?
I'm quite sure it was there before
now I just get list of workshop items, and those have a file list of duplicates
cg_emswheelchair.pbo
that's a stolen and rebranded sfp_wheelchair.pbo
Easiest would be to just send that list to BI and let them take care of it 😄
Maybe somehow filter out the monetized servers?
This is really mass violation...
Have fun, you better get a cup of coffee and something to eat
I doubt those numbers actually.
It would mean that 1 in 7 workshop items checked have it.
7733 items are known to the crawler.
I'd guess 1 in 7 is a life mod, most of them use the a3l files, where iirc the wheelchair was in
Well, he looked for the whole mod pack didn't he? So it's not 1500 reuploads of his wheelchair
@proud flicker Especially when doing a deep scan you can quickly accidently include the whole workshop in your result page 😄
But the result page shouldn't show incorrect info, I don't know of any issues with it, by default it matches by hash so that should be very accurate
@soft egret No, unless you want to give me some of those earnings.
Thanks.
@river spear did you decide on sql or elastic for storage?
@keen trout sql for accounts and stuff, elastic for everything else
cool 😃
Where as you would make a lot more than that, Lol XD
Want me to manually run the scan?
The workshop item with the ID 1438330795 is not known to us yet!
so I can't trigger a scan
@stark mulch just DMCA them. i don't even bother contacting them any more.
they will only argue your ears off. easier to just pop in a complaint. we d oabout 1 a week, and they go down within 2 days.
he took it down already
👍
down or friends/private only?
i dunno actually
@soft egret Why are you reporting us for stuff you dont make, that should be the owner of the mods choice.
It seems that you like to target us for some odd reason?
@carmine folio i see no problem with it, its in the interest of the community. Would you want someone uploading your content without permission?
@wild stone personally, i don't even care. If i create a mod, i would want people to use it, but who knows, my view might change. If i didn't want my mod to be used, i'd rather i get asked first before people take action
People have taken stuff from me, I just no there is nothing I can do because bohemia are very slow
I don't waste my time witch hunting server, I spend it creating stuff
Well each to there own
It's not just Deadmen reporting, we are All reporting to each other
So, no need to blame one person, blame all mod devs here
🤷
Thanks Obama
Essentially if you don't reupload/steal content etc you have nothing to fear
So I've been a 'mod maker' for about a year and someone has finally re-uploaded my stuff without permission. They've actually rolled almost my entire workshop into a single mod! Is the done thing to politely ask them to remove it before going further? It's looking like a case of ignorance i.e. wanting to make an 'all in one pack' for their clan (why not use collections?!??!?) than claiming work is their own.
Well you could politely ask them, but in my experience those that upload content without permission will not comply with an addon makers wishes. Just easier to report the content and file a take down request.
@indigo thorn what's ur mod?
Also DMCA on steam is kind of a way of letting them know that you want it taken down
I believe steam doesn't remove the mod right away, it gives them like idk how long to remove the DMCA'd content, before removing it
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1187306764&tscn=1531238010 , https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1078436541 , https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1069692316 , https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1109528858 are the big items
Also make sure you have your license clearly visible on the mod page as well, to avoid further incidents like this, just a suggestion, and if you don't want people to re-pack it, then don't use licenses like APL-SA, because while it has been said there's an "open interpretation" to what the license clearly states, people might get confused and think they can re upload your content.
I have to admit to being pretty naive when it comes to the licensing side and I've not actually made any statements about re-uploading as, when reading the steam conditions, I thought it was quite clear you could not re-upload unless you either had permission or were the IP holder itself. I might do a bit of googling about licenses to see what's most appropriate...
@indigo thorn
You can adapt ours If you like. There are also other mods around who share their license
http://cup-arma3.org/license
Specific Workshop-Enabled Apps or Workshop web pages may contain special terms (“App-Specific Terms”) that supplement or change the terms set out in this Section.
Thanks very much - most appreciated.
So basically if the Steam Workshop has a set of rules on how your material is handled, your own license pretty much overrules it, as in, you get to dictate your own terms
So always having your own strong license, that clearly states what's happening, will help you not only on steam workshop, but everywhere else as well
👍
@steady hare have you EVEN made a mod yet??
@mint edge i mean, i've worked on maps etc, made some vehicles (that were TRASH), but never publicly released anything
All private work so i can learn and focus on getting better at it, for when i do release stuff
when someone takes what youve made, claims it as their own, and then attempts to profit off of that work
you may have a change of heart xD
If they call it their own, then i would be slightly pissed off, but still i'd rather people wouldn't do stuff such as DMCA on behalf of me
Travis. Before you get started again ibwould recommend searching for Dwardens comment this morning mate
👆
well progress has been made today on the psisyn stuff. i spoke to him earlier and he has agreed to abandon the project.
he has blamed repentz for the uploads
without his consent
and wishes his name was not associated with this travesty of theft and rule-breaking
meanwhile we have identified 13 - yes thirteen - authors whose mods wer abused by these guys without any permit.
and we have stacked up a hard DMCA to hit their servers, TS, twitch, and youtube
so if they don't clean up their act in the next 24 hours, it's goodbye to psisyn and his servers.
i have t osay it has been a great day for mod authors, every single author who has been abused has rallied to the flag
well, in this situation it means removing monetization, which they have already done
and then apologising, which he has done
and in an ideal world donating all his proceeds to a war veterans charity like Help for Heroes, would be a really good gesture.
but i don't think he will stretch this far (maybe prove me wrong here Lewis and regain some credibility)
i estimate £50,000
In case no one remembers, he "Abandoned" his servers last time this was talked about a few weeks ago. Didn't follow through because things quieted down..
I would also assume a lot more money just based on Twitch subs tbh...
@hallow lark I'd hope he realizes for his own sake that Rob isn't lying.

