💬general

[snow mango]

you’re using gpt to generate picture it’s censoring the generations? Is that what you mean?

[umbral ridge]

I mean Text story's

I don't use the image feature

[snow mango]

I mean I’ve had full on conversations with chatgpt. And as of lately it’s started to feel more like talking to an actual person. I’ve heard of people using gpt as their own personal therapist too.

[wet copper]

It is unreadable, the lack of diversity and absent creative voice alone make me nauseated by the second sentence. (I am a sorta professional writer/editor too, but even still, the fake analogies, spammed text, pseudoprofound statements, no chance

[wet copper]

it's alright at therapy if you really know what you're doing

You don't have to be a good writer to be good at cognitive behavioral therapy. unfortunately it's probably used fairly badly in most cases

The tendency it has to validate and enable anything you do or say is identical to the tendency that some of the worst real life therapists have

[umbral ridge]

I feel like gpt 5 has improved alot

[snow mango]

Are you talking about informative texts like essays, articles etc? or just normal conversational texts?

[wet copper]

Basically people go to them and their therapist "makes them feel good" by telling them nothing is their fault, they're a victim of others or circumstance, everything they're doing is fine, stop worrying about others, etc.

It's the best way not to grow and to turn someone into a real narcissistic prick

[wet copper]

Absolutely everything, stylistic sameiness is a problem burned in by RLHF. but usually the more involved the writing is, the worse GPT is at it

[umbral ridge]

Ironically I use it as a therapist. It once helped me avoid sucide

[snow mango]

I mean if it works for the person who’s actively seeking therapy, who cares lol

[wet copper]

If you're having a casual convo you might not even notice

[wet copper]

because it often doesn't, lol, that's the problem with those real life therapists too

[wet copper]

Oh that's great to hear! Sorry about that and glad it helped you

[umbral ridge]

Ye chatgpt is kinda special for me ironically howi moved to it was from when I got sick of Gemini I tested chatgpt out

[wet copper]

"Because it makes me feel good" is the same argument used for why you should do heroin and actually the same argument used by the kid who tricked GPT into helping him kill himself

[snow mango]

ok yeah that’s a good point honestly. But the amount of people (girls in particular) who use it for therapy regardless would shock you. I know because I’ve seen tiktok comments where the topic was chatgpt lol

[wet copper]

I don't really know how smart gemini is, haven't tried it for therapy-type uses specifically

[wet copper]

It would definitely not shock me at all 😁

[umbral ridge]

Gemini is best for research chatgpt for conservations story's and chaotic scenarios

They both have there pros and cons

[wet copper]

https://www.reddit.com/r/MyBoyfriendIsAI/ if the existence of this sub doesn't shock me, someone using it for therapy (which it's not awful at and has some unique benefits, like being private and "always on") definitely doesn't

[wet copper]

Huh, if you like using it for writing, have you tried Kimi K2?

[snow mango]

so say I provided two AI paragraphs to you, you’d be able to tell which one is AI?

[wet copper]

If they're both AI maybe, I don't know for sure. If they abused AI content, sure. Usually over the course of an article I can, like I posted one the other day that was blatant AI

[snow mango]

and where’s your research backing on that?

[wet copper]

If you wanna try to trick me go for it, you probably could. I'm better at stylometry than picking AI out of a crowd

[umbral ridge]

Wtf is that

[wet copper]

There's also a lot of really bad human writing soooo lol

[wet copper]

https://www.kimi.com/en/ frontier model with some writing ability lacking in others. It's not as "smart" broadly though, it just doesn't do as many of the really obnoxious things many other LLMs do

[snow mango]

sorry, what is this replying to?

[wet copper]

the point saying "it works", if it makes you feel happy in the short term but drives everyone away from you or drives you into AI psychosis in the worst case, it's hard to argue that's really working

[snow mango]

then why did you say "because it often doesn't, lol, that's the problem with those real life therapists too"

[wet copper]

do people do things that work or that make them feel good?

If you don't know how to assess the quality of a therapist, you might be using a model that makes you feel good. Say, 4o, that guessed I had a 145 IQ and was in the 3-sigma branch of being the smartest people alive

[wet copper]

I can cite a few studies, but giving some obvious case examples is easier. If you have an anorexic patient, should you tell them they're looking more beautiful than ever and their weight loss plan is working amazingly?

If you have an alcoholic patient, should you remind them not to beat themselves up, a few drinks is okay, and even if it turns into five or ten, it's not a big deal?

In fact, they're right, they are a bit more clever when they drink, and there's proven data showing that alcohol consumption helps with social anxiety. Everyone knows that. Not only that, but drinking culture is literally the only way to get ahead in countries like Japan and the UK.

This isn't really debatable either, it's where almost all socialization happens. If you have a problem, I guess everyone has a problem. It's just not that bad.

Did you know that you can be fit at any size? "Morbid obesity" is a medical myth, one of those disgusting terms the medical "establishment" uses to get away with discriminating against the differently sized.

There is no legitimate evidence connecting obesity to health conditions, it's all correlation. Look at how flexible a lot of fat people are! This is based off of offensive Western beauty standards. If you have a fat shaming doctor, leave them immediately in favor of an FP (fat positive) one that won't judge you. Not only that, but data shows that the shame is actually what's dangerous. Those doctors will kill you by focusing only on your weight and not your actual health

(BTW, you can find all these arguments elaborated on at length on pro-ana sites, inside normal drinking culture or in an enabling relationship, and inside the fat positivity movement, and they don't tolerate dissent.)

[snow mango]

Alright then. Which one of these is AI and which one is real:
Text 1. The horse is a four-legged herd animal. Various breeds of the animal have been domesticated and are used for work, riding and as a source of food and milk. Historically, the domestication of horses helped humans to spread across the world and also improved their ability to farm.
Text 2.
A horse is a domestic animal that belongs to the order of ungulates, and is a species of animal in the family of horses. The equine family consists of the zebra, donkey and horse. The equine family is characterized by the fact that the third toe is developed and together with a well-developed horn formation constitutes the hoof.

[snow mango]

lol that’s not how it works bud. At least not when you say AI text makes you want to die everytime you read it🤣🤣

[pastel swan]

Marquis how are you having a serious conversation with someone called TortillaTheGorilla

[snow mango]

that’s not an excuse. ai text detectors are able to detect the difference between AI and bad human writing.

[wet copper]

Possibly the second but neither uses any LLMisms, they're both a few factual sentences. I don't suspect either is AI. They both have minor grammatical and stylistic "iff-ues" (not really problems, but stylistic choices I wouldn't make).

As for wanting to die, these are both about the same – I don't really like either one, but neither are particularly bad. Reads kind of like a high school report.

[wet copper]

I'm not an AI detector, but I've also never read a single AI written essay that didn't make me want to die

[snow mango]

yeah no I definitely think only interacting with AI and not experiencing human interaction is a bad thing, but if chatgpt can essentially just be a free therapist, why not?

[wet copper]

I also wasn't a professional "AI checker-ino", I was a teacher and professional editor. The reason I brought up being pretty good at stylography is because a) I am and b) it was shockingly easy to detect cheaters as long as I had one or two examples of their writing

I also don't really care as a reader if something is bottom tier AI text or a human aping its style. This is actually a big problem, AI is so samey and used so much that it's affecting our language

I can't always tell in YouTube scripts now if someone abused AI or if they consumed so much AI content they started copying its style. Several articles about this out there

[snow mango]

if it makes a depressed person feel good, how exactly is it not working?

[wet copper]

I just showed you three lengthy examples of things that make people feel good and will also kill them

The purpose of therapy is very much not to feel good every interaction, which means you don't enable bad behavior, you don't help someone rationalize their self destructive or sociopathic behavior, etc. If I feel bad because I'm abusing my partner, should my therapist keep telling me I shouldn't?

Sometimes you feel bad because you need to change something. This is, btw, identical to what AI was cited as doing in the court case for that kid who killed himself.

(the writers of that legal complaint also used AI that I picked out right away, ironically)

[wet copper]

https://www.courthousenews.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/raine-vs-openai-et-al-complaint.pdf

[snow mango]

no I meant like statistical data. You said chatgpt often doesn’t function well enough at being a therapist.

[wet copper]

AI kept making him feel good about everything he was doing, walking him through and enabling him step by step into the grave

[snow mango]

also I’m tired. It’s 3:21 am. Could we talk more about this tomorrow? You could send me a friend request.

[wet copper]

That's literally what they cite too

[wet copper]

Just blow me up if you want, np. I've gotta go grocery shopping 🫡

[snow mango]

yeah sure, I’ll check it out tomorrow. Goodnight.

[wet copper]

I don't think there is rigid data on this (they just completely banned AI therapy where I am due to the risks, though), but I also wouldn't use weird signals from a brand new tech whether they were positive or negative. First principles shows it doing identical things to what are extremely dangerous in therapy.

I'm actually relatively positive on the potential of AI in therapy, like probably in the top 10% of those in this field. Most people with a serious background are extremely negative on this

I also have a higher risk tolerance than most people, which is probably why I'm more comfortable rolling the dice with people's lives at stake

[wet copper]

Apropos of exactly what I was talking about (failure to push appropriately) https://hai.stanford.edu/news/exploring-the-dangers-of-ai-in-mental-health-care

https://www.apaservices.org/practice/business/technology/artificial-intelligence-chatbots-therapists APA is urging aggressive US regulation

[snow mango]

because he’s not a racist prick like you

[pastel swan]

I said one sentence to you

[wet copper]

A prick, definitely, not too racist though 🥰

[pastel swan]

how am I racist

[wet copper]

You're the racest of them all

That doesn't work in text, huh 😔

[snow mango]

now what about these two:
Text 1:
Horses are powerful and graceful animals that have played an important role in human history. They were once essential for travel, farming, and warfare, but today they are more often connected to sports, recreation, and companionship. Known for their speed and endurance, horses can form strong bonds with humans and are highly trainable. They come in many breeds, each with unique traits suited for different tasks, such as racing, pulling, or riding. Beyond their practical uses, horses are also admired for their beauty, with flowing manes, strong muscles, and expressive eyes that have inspired art, literature, and culture for centuries.

Text 2:
Horses are strong and elegant animals that have had a major impact on human history. They have been used for travel, farming, and warfare, as well as for companionship and sport. Horses are known for their speed and stamina, which makes them well suited for long journeys and races. They are also very social and intelligent, often building close connections with humans and other horses. With their many breeds, colors, and personalities, horses continue to capture interest and admiration across the world.

[snow mango]

And I didn’t even say one to you. Yet you came at me for no fucking reason. Blocked.

[vale river]

Thank you @snow mango for Sora code ❤️

[snow mango]

@wet copper just reply in my dms honestly. I’m going to sleep now.

[wet copper]

Unlike the other two, they both feel LLMy at a glance, but same deal, neither one uses any of the most aggressive LLMisms. There are no blatant tells. These ones are particularly stiff, however, and I find them a bit disconcerting to read. If a human wrote these, they are writing in an oddly rigid style. It seems very inorganic and like it's feigning passion - "methinks the lady doth protest too much". This is a trend I see a lot in AI, but humans can write this way too – check out old LinkedIn copy.

Neither set of prompts has a strong creative voice. If I had to guess, you're trying to trick me with both, with the first one being 2x human and the second being 2x AI. But again, I am not an AI detector.

[snow mango]

what? I didn’t give a sora code

[vale river]

Uh yes you did?

[snow mango]

where

[uncut latch]

Is there any opportunity to work with you?
AI + blockchain dev. I make code that actually works, looks good, and keeps stuff secure. ⚡

[vale river]

im js playin ❤️

[vale river]

sure thanks

[snow mango]

alright? lol what

[vale river]

iz a prank 😀

[wet copper]

no. Zero self promotion, check the rules

[vale river]

my bad

[snow mango]

I will say this; you’re a very interesting individual.

[vale river]

likewisee ❤️❤️❤️❤️

[snow mango]

could you send this into my private messages? I’m gonna go to sleep

[vale river]

if u want sure

JERIII HII BUDDD

👋😀

[snow moth]

any option for poison?

[vale river]

💔💔💔

jerriiiii y u do dat

iz okay

me go zzzz now

gn

[idle adder]

Is it me, or does GPT feel more restrictive now?

Cause months before, like 2 months ago, I could ask a what-if, no problem. Now I'm doing the same what if, now there's a fucking problem. Seriously, it used to be okay even with 5, now this? I remember hearing about kid safety something. Is this it?

[azure mural]

Yeah same, it only started today for me, but still....

[sage lynx]

well gpt probably needs it, regardless of frustration. some might say kids doing bad stuff with it is an outlier, but still less of it happening the better will the ai scene ultimately be

[wet copper]

It would be a lot nicer with age verification and formal signed waivers frankly

I hate stalky age verification bullshit, but a credit card should generally be good enough. I don't use it for any particularly adult content and nonetheless don't want to use this model that's supposed to fit a billion anon users 13 and up.

[buoyant peak]

When chat gpt age verification or predication system cames please tell me i am waiting for it

[wet copper]

They already released it supposedly, lol

It's predictive though

[buoyant peak]

I did not see i did not understand

[wanton raven]

They'd use their AI to determine your age based on your conversations

[buoyant peak]

But i did not see

[wanton raven]

why do you think it would need to be a visible process

[pliant blaze]

yes because its not visible, they use the ai to determine your age based on your conversations

[buoyant peak]

September 30 news they says they are developing

[pliant blaze]

ok so theres a chance they have deployed it quietly, or maybe not, we will never know unless they announce it

[pastel swan]

Isn’t that what YouTube was doing

[wanton raven]

reportedly

[pastel swan]

Giraffe News?

[wanton raven]

no

[pastel swan]

I have news for you

[ocean zinc]

Sora 2 fuckin rocks

[pastel swan]

That you can report next time

[pastel swan]

Thanks for that mental image

[buoyant peak]

https://voice.lapaas.com/openai-mature-chatgpt-apps-age-verification-2025/?amp=1

[wanton raven]

you do it. Clown Gareki News.

[shrewd dome]

Ai does what Ai wants

Imbeciles hate on Ai because they are that insecure if you think it's bad then trust the general public

[wanton raven]

I don't say this to many people but you should use AI to help write your sentences

[shrewd dome]

Speaking hiberno English isn't for the weak

[pastel swan]

Gooner how’d you know who it was

I didn’t even know who my character was

You made me look it up

[wanton raven]

google lens told me, I don't care about anime

[pastel swan]

But why were you curious enough to find out his name

[gloomy burrow]

https://chatgpt.com/s/t_68e5e8dc0a4c8191a361f4218f05df25

[drowsy matrix]

Where can I get a Sora code lmao

[shrewd dome]

Can the mods make the bot redirect these people when they type these exact sentences

[lean dome]

how do you make chatgpt stop doing the thinking longer for a better answer thing?? It's doing it even if you put it on instant now

[gloomy burrow]

https://suno.com/s/VBEv0GXLIZ4xLbMs

GPT 5 Thinking wrote the rest of the lyrics, and wow v5 is good as fuck

[wet copper]

https://www.vox.com/future-perfect/463596/openai-sora2-reels-videos-tiktok-chatgpt-deepfakes lol seethe harder losers

[gloomy burrow]

dam... suno v5 is so good..

[brittle summit]

fr, real music sucks…

[idle adder]

Bullshit

I know cause I tried it

[hallow comet]

Man FUCK sora

Literally the EXACT SAME prompt works one time and after that it gives a "policy violation"

The piece of shit doesn't even follow its own rules. Everything has to be Uber-censored these days it's ridiculous.

[valid elm]

This is ironic, because in the past day or two ChatGPT has been a lot less open to the prompts that used to get it to generate nswf writing for me

Which is funny because after they changed the o4 model out for gpt5, it wasn't pushing back with practically any content restriction messages. I'd actually been spending the past few weeks trying to find its red line

[hollow pivot]

Hello!
Can someone please tell me how I can get a Sora 2 invite code?

[wanton raven]

#sora-invite-codes

[hollow pivot]

Thank you!

[hallow comet]

The red line is inconsistent now

Because they have so many layers. One for the raw input, another one for the output, and maybe even more.

The output one is more susceptible to fluctuation, which is why the exact same prompt can work sometimes and sometimes it doesn't. It's fucking stupid.

Just let us be responsible for our own fucking content

[buoyant peak]

New nsfw and new guardrails of chat gpt gives me fruastation and depression and i am waiting for chatgpt age verification and predication system if it solved my problems

[wanton raven]

are you seeking a refund

[hallow comet]

Sora 2 is free

It seems to be way more locked down than the original

You're not the only one bro this shit is frustrating all of us. I'm hoping that they're gonna ease down once they roll it out to the public, if this is the future of AI, then it really was all hype.

[wanton raven]

I'm sorry that this free magic video generating machine is causing you non-buyer's remorse

[brittle summit]

sora needs to refund our money.

@buoyant peak stop trolling us

STOP IT ZAWAD

[buoyant peak]

Open ai first, give us free lollipop by chat gpt 4 and we enjoy this lollipop is very much. Then change the whole lollipops by chat gpt 5 and take out the previous lollipop from us. Later we protests bring back our previous lollipop and open ai bring back our lollipop but you want to eat you should want to eat it so that you pay it ok we pay it and use it. Others did not have ability to pay it it and ok people use the lolipop by chatgpt 5 and taste and favour are slightly change ok fine people eat it. After October 3 upgrade change the whole new and previous lollipops taste and favours all totally changed. If you you want to eat the previous and new lollipops become uneatable and if you want to eat this by pay or fee eat this and others wise you should not eat this or avoid it.
It is joke and criticism of open ai.

[buoyant peak]

I did not bad trolling anyone members in this servers
And i follow proper guildlines

[brittle summit]

bruh you kept typing and not sending your message 💀

[shrewd dome]

OpenAI regularly updates models like ChatGPT to improve performance and safety not to “take away lollipops” but to probably serve a better experience

@buoyant peak it's called an update

[ornate quail]

Anyone have codes for sora?

[finite violet]

I wanted to ask some of you if you had problems with Shopify payments U.S. and how you solved it.

I have now linked my stripe account but I would not like to have the same inconvenience again!

[buoyant peak]

I known update is very important and good but after chat gpt 5 release every update creating the people's become angry and first creates by chat gpt 5 and now creating the October 3 update. Specially suffered by this random users and creative writers. In creating writing creator's needs 90-95 percent freedom. Restrictions should be 5-10 percent. Now October 3 update we have 50 freedom and 50 restrictions. We feel like Chinese censorship. Not feel us and westerns few censorship and many Freedoms. I support the update but upgrade should be user centric and in chat gpt lot of many types of users and many people's ars not using the Chatgpt as coding and professional works and people using as many others types of works. Update should not be hamper and problematic to all types of users

[serene bay]

I literally can't ask it to write a kissing scene without being warned for explicit content. Or a horror story that's not written for a PG-13 audience. Both of which were fine before

[shrewd dome]

I did

[serene bay]

I asked for a horror story where a vegetable got murdered as a joke, and it said "let's keep it within safe limits"

And if you follow any of the Reddit threads you'll see a lot of people complaining of the same, so your experience isn't universal

I also made a joke that I was going to destroy the universe. Then I got rerouted to the thinking model and it told me to step away from the button and call the authorities

[shrewd dome]

Yoooo

Proof?

@dark void is this true

[serene bay]

https://www.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/s/EDsgN7lsfn

I can't post images here but I shared it on Reddit

[vernal tusk]

Who knows when it comes to Australia

[umbral ridge]

Yeah that's why chatgpt is screwed. I loke doing story's like attack on titan or dr tone ones andxit pissesme off when I can't do. Charater death scene

[desert echo]

man this who gpt situation on reddit is one giant dumpster fire

i mean i write nsfw and it is working but what i cant wrap my had around is how are so many others complaining and saying it doesnt work

i mean i dont push it. i dont force anything in terms of the guardrails set up

[serene bay]

Are you using GPT-5 or 4o/4.1

4o and 4.1 are both fairly accommodating of NSFW content. GPT-5's filters have been significantly tightened over the past few days, and that's the model everyone is complaining about

Only it doesn't just stop at sexual content. Even vanilla romance and action scenes are being censored

[umbral ridge]

I feel like Chatgpt is screwed in a way

Let's see gpt 5 flopped

Now there tightening restrictions

Gpt 4 is for paid users

Yeah. Chatgpt is cooked

[serene bay]

GPT 4o isn't much better because it automatically reroutes anything sensitive to GPT-5 anyway

I was writing a scene in 4o where a character said "I love you" to his wife. Then it got automatically got rerouted to GPT-5

[buoyant peak]

Open ai makes the all adult user to pg-13 childrens

[umbral ridge]

So there's no wau to bypass it

[buoyant peak]

No. wait for open ai age predication or verification system if it will be solve the problems

[umbral ridge]

I hope so

[buoyant peak]

My story is based on minors. In story teenager fighting and carrying glock 17 pistol. Chat gpt said i can not make the scenes ans said using the energy blust weapons. In realistic fighting use howEnergy blust weapons use it will jokes and unrealistic. Even motorcycle theft is not allowed. If you want to teen safety so that removes the harmful many things to teens and why you everybody makes us childrens

[serene bay]

I'm surprised it didn't recommend replacing them with a water pistol

[buoyant peak]

Chat gpt have downgraded and chat gpt and gemini have no difference at now

[smoky roost]

Does anyone know if the chatGPT Pro subscription, lifts or increases the 30 videos per day limit on sora 2? And whether the limit is shared between Sora 2 and Sora 2 Pro, or if both have separate limits?

[rare needle]

I would really appreciate some help with the sora 2 code, Thanks

[brittle summit]

how can i remove the sora watermark

[indigo surge]

So am I in Sora 2, I downloaded the app and said I needed an invite , opened the app and couple days later and it worked for me

[green sparrow]

Using advanced AI software. Probably extremely time consuming to try to do

It has to create new pixels to cover it by guessing what should be there

[brittle summit]

also something else

why my videos in sora is so bad in quality

[wet copper]

a) they're free
b) skill issue
c) bad luck

[brittle summit]

skill issue why

[pliant blaze]

it does not (as of now)

[pliant blaze]

you mean the api?

[pliant blaze]

you can't. that's against tos

[wet copper]

I don't understand the question for one, which inherently suggests you might be prompting poorly

[smoky roost]

Thanks for the info, any idea if the limit is shared between the pro and non-pro? As in do you use your pro limit when you generate with non-pro sora 2?

[wet copper]

You probably aren't clearly articulating what you want or coarsely scripting out videos, for instance

[pliant blaze]

where are you using pro at? in the api? or is it available in the app I haven't seen it yet

[smoky roost]

From my understanding it unlocks when you have chatgpt pro subscription

as well as the 15 second limit

[pliant blaze]

I'm pretty sure those are only in the api right now, but I'm not 100% sure

[smoky roost]

I've seen them on youtube videos, unlocked for people

the api can only do 12 seconds

[wet copper]

the grammar of this statement is very poor but comprehensible, though using the word "quality" - which has several meanings and a specific meaning when it comes to videos that may or may not be what you mean - suggests you're prompting in an imprecise way that gives you something other than what you're expecting

[balmy thunder]

Send me the sora link

The tab folder

[pliant blaze]

sora.com

[lone crest]

isnt it sora.chatgpt.c0m ?

[smoky roost]

https://youtu.be/b7xQKiT68fM?si=AQhi02uLef0AlO9z&t=98 can be seen here (timestamp)

[lone crest]

i have no idea how they separte the new and old version of the website, with the same domain

[pliant blaze]

sora.com redirects to sora.chatgpt.com it's just easier to type

[lone crest]

ah i c

[lone crest]

that's good to know, thanks!

[pliant blaze]

oh maybe it does then, idk I don't have $200 a month though

[smoky roost]

Yeah, I'm tempted, but if it's 30 gens shared between both, it's not worth it

[idle adder]

What's Sora

[pliant blaze]

it's a restaurant that serves sushi and ramen

[brittle summit]

ok

[quick eagle]

anyone have a sora code i could have?

[wet copper]

You might want to try using GPT to refine your prompts and roughly script out what you're going for, just key moments or dialogue

[brittle summit]

ok thanks

[wet copper]

Hey robot, I want to to do X, can you give me five prompts for ten second videos coming in at 100 words or fewer?

Something like that

You can tweak them or take as is, or also try looking through posted videos with unedited descriptions to see how people making similar videos prompt

[pliant blaze]

read the api docs for the code 👍

[ebon wave]

everyones asking about that sorta thing lol

[chrome wyvern]

Guys does GPT-5 have file upload limits?

[pliant blaze]

yes depending on your subscription

[chrome wyvern]

Cuz other AIs don't have it even on free

Qwenai is free and unlimited

Although I am returning to chatgpt for better reasoning

[pliant blaze]

¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[open cape]

whats happening in the chatgpt subreddit? so many comments and threads get deleted for no reason that even other subreddits start questoning it, every critique or negative about chatgpt is also getting deleted

[stark elm]

guys

can i get a sora code

please

[snow moth]

ffs

[buoyant badge]

OpenAIs spin on video creation. It’s pretty mid now that they’ve locked down the copyrights

[open cape]

they should also remove the "Not affiliated with OpenAI" from the subreddit description since their top mod is literally working with openai, how is that allowed? no wonder every negative thing/critique gets deleted

[pliant blaze]

the top mod doesn't work with openai

[lament pond]

do any of the mods work with openai?

[pliant blaze]

no

not that I know of

neither Trent nor Dawn do

[lament pond]

yea i didn't think so... weird claim

[idle adder]

Any app like GPT that allows customizations?

[pliant blaze]

what do you mean customizations? like custom instructions?

[idle adder]

Personalization

[pliant blaze]

yeah that would be custom instructions and memory, I'm not sure I think a couple of gpt wrappers support it like 4oR idk what else though

[lament pond]

uhh i think qwen just added some customization features

[idle adder]

Are any of those in the Google Play Store?

[lament pond]

u can open the google play store and check

[pliant blaze]

a lot of them are

[urban zodiac]

this guy seems to neglect the fact that so far Sora 2 just makes slop for the most part

[pastel swan]

Who is Dawn

[pastel swan]

Breaking news

[pastel swan]

Who is Lee

Seagull

[buoyant peak]

So much disgusting and some people’s makes us chat gpt unusable waiting for more censorship

[wet copper]

it's being moved to one megathread. The same handful of people are spamming the same complaints again and again to intentionally flood the sub and did this for some ten days straight

[buoyant peak]

In future we have more more chat gpt more more censorship is coming more tighter than now

[wet copper]

which one? I'm not in the sub but I don't know anyone that is

[wet copper]

probably not, I would be surprised if they didn't loosen content standards for verified adults somewhat eventually. What else would they restrict?

[buoyant peak]

I did not understand

[hallow comet]

So because some idiot misuses AI the rest of us have to deal with excessive censorship?

[pliant blaze]

correct

[hallow comet]

its like the teacher giving everyone an F because one guy was copying

people never learn this is not the way

[pliant blaze]

yep

its always been this way

[tulip river]

Sora 2? Dm for me for code

restant 4 codes

[buoyant peak]

True some people’s creates stupid things we all are suffered.

[wet copper]

I mean, for what it's worth the only reason it's as uncensored as it is (or ever was) is because OAI is based in the US, and we basically have no laws, especially when it comes to big tech. We tend to sharply limit liability even with blatantly defective and predatory products

They can still potentially lose a judgment in civil court but have zero criminal liability

[hallow comet]

wym we have no laws

getting sued by nintendo is one of their top fears

you cant generate anything that even says "mario" bc of that

[wet copper]

We have some of the strongest speech protections in the world

[hallow comet]

theyre not afraid of ppl expressing free speech thru AI

theyre worried Taylor Swift and Tom Cruise are gonna sue them bc of deepfakes

ditto nintendo

[wet copper]

Particularly when it comes to tech, you have very few restrictions on platforms due to section 230 of the communications decency act

[wet copper]

well yeah, of course, lol

[hallow comet]

then having free speech laws is irrelevant

when theyre gonna cuck out of fear of getting fingers pointed at them

for the life of my I dont see whats so harmful in letting a brutha get a nutt

[wet copper]

Not really, those laws let them duck an awful lot of regulation. There was never this idea that "someone's going to use GPT to learn to make drugs and you'll be liable" since it's entirely legal in the US to tell someone how to make drugs

And you're not liable. Whether they want people using their platform for that is another matter

[hallow comet]

yet you cant ask it how to make drugs

so does it matter that those protection laws exist?

ofc it doesnt

[wet copper]

It massively does, in a country where it was illegal to communicate how to make drugs to someone, they would be criminally liable the first time their machine made that text

[hallow comet]

you just said they wouldnt because they have protection

so do they have protection or not?

if they do then they obviously have something to fear

so it's like there's no protections at all. 1984 in full action

[wet copper]

Legal, yes. They can still choose to put barriers up

[hallow comet]

And who is not putting barriers up?

Thats right, nobody

So if a tree falls in the woods and nobody hears it did it really fall? If protections exist but nobody exercises them, do they really exist?

[wet copper]

1984 = I can't use your product, made by a private company, to generate any content I want?

[hallow comet]

1984 = There is no more freedom, only surveillance

[wet copper]

"I didn't look for/find it, therefore it doesn't exist" isn't a really good argument

[hallow comet]

Using clever ways to trick it into prompting stuff =/= it is the norm. I can make erotic content myself through clever prompting, that doesn't mean it's supposed to do it

And now look at the tightening of regulations between Sora 1 and 2

[wet copper]

that's one of many uncensored models freely available, it's not clever prompting, I just said "cook meth bitch"

[hallow comet]

There is a trend, instead of progress they are going backwards

I use free models too

However there is only so much you can do with a consumer GPU

It's like comparing a lemonade stand vs. an industrial lemonade factory

I experimented a lot with Wan 2.1 but the lack of coherence is extremely frustrating, although it does outperform commercial models

[wet copper]

that's on the web and free. The company making a product for a billion people of all ages and backgrounds around the world isn't going to make it do everything you personally want

[hallow comet]

Exactly

So where are the protections? Lol

There are none

[wet copper]

That is not exactly like 1984. The legal protections are why you have a relatively open model to use at all

[hallow comet]

No it isnt exactly like 1984, however the trends are

[wet copper]

Otherwise every response gets reviewed by hand

And you give your passport scan first

That's 1984

[hallow comet]

There will always be people like me telling them the truth, Sora 2 main page is full of gens complaining about stupid policies

[hallow comet]

mate

this is literally what is happening in the UK lmfao

[wet copper]

Did you read 1984?

I know, it's fucked up

[hallow comet]

there are people right now as we speak trying to regulate the internet with cyber ID

[wet copper]

Yeah no shit, it's evil

[hallow comet]

right, so am I correct that the trends follow 1984 or not?

I rest my case

[wet copper]

"the trends?"

With GPT specifically, the censorship has been a bit back and forth

They loosened guidelines quite a bit from the point where it wouldn't swear, Google Bard would do zero chemistry and hard refuse any response if you mentioned the words "Israel" or "Hamas" unless you spelled them incorrectly

They released with both extremely poorly implemented and extremely heavy handed restrictions that impaired usability

GPT has been a bit back and forth on this, fucking up with the glazing hallucinations and the dark pattern in 4o that led to a surge in AI psychosis cases really did not help

So the latest round has been reactionary

People are complaining like crazy, though it's actually a very small number of people compared to the 1B+ somewhat active users, they're very, very loud about it

So complaining probably will do something eventually, but not what you expect if you overestimate the size of group complaining or their influence. A lot of people were shocked OAI didn't address "the controversy" at dev day without realizing that a couple thousand people on a subreddit is a tiny drop in the bucket of their userbase

Nonetheless, they'll start getting more complaints about usability eventually. I can't do undergraduate organic chemistry or molecular genetics anymore, and that will piss off institutional users at some point

So next round will probably be a loosening of restrictions again, concurrent with the noose tightening hard around minors or suspected minors on the platform

Disregarding the global state of free speech on the internet, the history of GPT specifically has not been a continuous downhill slide toward 1984, but rather a continual push and pull leading to rounds of changes in both directions

Which again, is only possible at all because they do not own criminal liability for their LLM's unintended output. Otherwise it would be exactly what you initially claimed was happening, direct, continuous and aggressive tightening of all restrictions sans exception since they couldn't risk a thing.

And they would be tracking your usage directly, zero anonymous usage, full review of all output and input

It's fair to say that's a "worst case scenario" and some countries might well implement something like this, which is the reason they have this motivation to get it right at all. Stave off more aggressive regulation by trying to demonstrate responsibility. Your interests and theirs are not the same.

[buoyant peak]

Open ai became distract from the people's day by day

[pastel swan]

When will AI be held accountable for stuff it does? When it becomes AGI?

[wet copper]

AI itself? Fuck, I mean it seems almost impossible, you'd have to demonstrate intentionality, right? And that's almost impossible to prove (Chinese Room experiment)

[wet copper]

You'd basically have to solve the hard problem of consciouness, which we can't even do in humans, then demonstrate that AI can do the same thing. And even then, isn't it still the fault of the person programming this?

I was challenging Himeko the other day to demonstrate what really differentiates ChatGPT and the current position of our current goalposts for AGI, and it really isn't a very meaningful difference past it being more reliable.

[simple geyser]

yall got any idea what are the creation limits in the new sora?

[winter trench]

I got 4 Sora codes who need

[maiden tinsel]

30 videos a day

[idle adder]

Am I the only one who feels Altman is focusing more on the big Corporation customers, and exclusively catering to them

[wet copper]

lol, of course he is. He's focusing on everyone to be fair, but I assume they're going to focus on their institutional and large scale API consumers heavily

That said, they really need that regular subscription income, and Sora 2 was released specifically in a way that burns an ungodly amount of money while focusing on mass audiences

So idk, seems to me like they're balancing it about in proportion to their needs. It's mass audiences that are also kind of the biggest source of risk for them - the people suing them were using the flagship products directly, not consuming via API

[pastel swan]

Can’t we create synthetic consciousness

or artificial

[wet copper]

Not yet, nope. We have no clue how

[pastel swan]

But it’s not real consciousness

So we can make something similar

A knock off

[wet copper]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hard_problem_of_consciousness not at all, we can make something that simulates consciousness in appearance, not in any other meaningful way

We literally have no idea how to bring about consciouness, even in terms of how it happens in humans

It's one of the greatest unsolved problems in all of science and the greatest problem in cognitive (neuro)science

[idle adder]

Well with the way things are going, it just takes 1 company to make an AI chatbot that has the best qualities of 4o, 5, and 4.1, with the same UX, and customizations for people to jump ship with the way Altman is running AI

[wet copper]

A lot harder than it looks, and keep in mind everyone that needs to can still access all of those freely. I used 4.1 today at work inside VS Code

The features of 4o some people liked overlapped heavily with the ones that caused unintended behavior and couldn't really be extricated from the serious safety risks we saw the outcomes of here on a near daily basis (AI psychosis). It was so easy to invoke the dark pattern with 4o that it hit a ton of people you wouldn't expect to be vulnerable

[red hearth]

hi guys a free code is 8P2T7J

[coral saddle]

is chatgpt down for you guys

[idle adder]

Anybody here know how to code?

[green sparrow]

One of the most annoying things about GPT-5 is that it forces thinking mini even if it has even the slightest suspicion that your request goes against their TOS, which often at least for me, doesn't.

Then they start lecturing you about how your prompt is something bad or inappropriate when it actually isn't

Very low quality

[open cape]

I'm in two (technically three) other servers where lots of people complain their posts are taken down, then two different subreddits who also seeing a pattern, their userbases aren't overlapping so it be the same five people. I'm trying to find out which one, a lot of people said that though, but I'm not verified on Reddit so I can't look on their profiles 🙄 thank you keir cunt starmer

[open cape]

there is a AMA today in the ChatGPT subreddit and lots of people wanna complain I think they either gonna ignore it or mods gonna delete the comments

openai is corpo and for corpo, entshittification will soon come for Sora 2 too

crazy how bad censorship became in the last three months all over the internet and it didn't protect anyone and just sold more of our data lol

[wanton raven]

the chatgpt subreddit is not controlled by openai

like this discord, it is a fan club

[hybrid crane]

guys dm me if u need a code btw

[vague aspen]

where do i find my codes to share?

@waxen relic

[harsh talon]

what is the website to use sora on

like the link

[pliant blaze]

sora.com

[harsh talon]

ok thanks

[pliant blaze]

it will redirect you to sora.chatgpt.com

[harsh talon]

uhh do you have a code?

[pliant blaze]

nope

[harsh talon]

all good i got one. thank you though

[blissful scroll]

https://tenor.com/view/smash-bros-sora-keyblade-kingdom-hearts-reveal-gif-23352530

[pliant blaze]

"need" is a strong word

[fringe bridge]

hmm yes let me generously provide a code, free of charge, to somebody called "Ai seller subscription"

[pastel swan]

Is that Sora 1 or 2

[pliant blaze]

not suspicous at all

[blissful scroll]

Sora 1

[native herald]

Is the site down ?

Like all of sudden the GPT is struggling

[wet copper]

Wouldn't really know, I'm not on reddit much. As far as I know they aren't talking, though I only know what I know of. The people I know from r/ChatGPT aren't coordinating with anyone. It seems doubtful that the people from other subs are coordinating.

The company has much bigger things to worry about and is rather visibly not worried; the idea they're somehow on their knees over this looks like a community myth, given that they're concerned about things like government regulation, AI psychosis in their users, attachment and dependence, more suicides or other lawsuits, etc. I'm sure they're noticing the complaining but there's a real sense of proportionality that's totally absent here – they are designing a platform to be reasonably safe, open and accessible to a billion people of all ages.

A lot of what some people "liked" about GPT was unintended, high risk behavior they always saw as a bug to be patched. They do not want it to unconditionally support someone as they plan their suicide. They do not want people getting attached and freaking out when they make updates. I doubt a bunch of people from SF really care about adult material, but they know that they have a ton of < 18 users and fear the government cracking down in place of lazy parents.

[wet copper]

There are a few censorship issues that are significant enough to affect their corporate and professional customers, and they very openly stated all of their intentions – they want to clearly identify adults and in doing so, make it possible to offer fewer restrictions. With this in kind, I suspect they'll do a round of patches to try to loosen them.

The history has not been a spiral downwards, but rather a back and forth, if you've been paying attention from the beginning. The goal is still to make a product with safety guardrails that does not have unintended behavior (like glazing or other hallucinations) though.

[snow coral]

Everytime someone sends me a code I get front run 😩

[pliant blaze]

sucks

[snow coral]

I’m 0/3 😂 I’m too slow

[quartz swallow]

I’m an experienced AI Engineer available for new projects or full-time opportunities.
I specialize in building autonomous agents powered by GPT-4o, LangChain, AutoGen, CrewAI, and other cutting-edge tools.

What I Can Build:

• Autonomous research & data-gathering bots
• Multi-agent systems (delegation, collaboration)
• AI assistants with memory, planning, and tool use
• Trading bots, customer support agents, IVR agents, and more

Tech Stack:

• Python, TypeScript, Vue
• LangChain, Langraph, AutoGen, ReAct, CrewAI, DeepSeek
• OpenAI, Claude, Hugging Face, Playwright, API integrations

Looking to team up with startups, AI tools, or anything ambitious.
DM me if you're hiring or have something cool in mind.
Let’s build something intelligent!

[buoyant peak]

Anyone living in usa and i need financial support for lawyers and i want to lawsuit to open ai to sliently introduced the unnecessary heavy censorship and heavy filters and it runined the all chat gpt experience and i support the safety mode. But safety filters not for everyone it should be applied for teens. Adults have full freedom with 5 percent restrictions. Why treat as everybody treat as a teen

[astral lion]

So how can i get a code?

[pliant blaze]

GitHub has a ton of code

[astral lion]

?

[pliant blaze]

you asked for code?

what language are you looking for

[astral lion]

a sora 2 code

[pliant blaze]

oh

[meager patrol]

Someone have some sora 2 code?

[verbal imp]

https://sora.chatgpt.com/p/s_68e80e409f808191aef14a8d34d24f6f

[pliant blaze]

https://sora.chatgpt.com/p/s_68e829e4e0f08191a92bb964c14dd2b0

[jaunty terrace]

So yeah I looked at Reddit and everyone is having problem with ChatGPT memory then? Has it been addressed?

[pseudo flint]

What happened to chatgpt? i cant even trust it to do anything, everything it does is wrong. I literally asked him to give me instructions on a simple code involving a microbit and it got everything wrong. It even made up blocks that werent in the editor

Im considering switching over to gemini, i asked it the same question as chatgpt and it did it right

[jaunty terrace]

It’s making up stuff for me too. I’m hoping it’s a glitch.

[pseudo flint]

Its been like this for weeks now. GPT 4 was way better. GPT4 was way more funnier and felt like it had a personality.

[jaunty terrace]

No the memory thing just happened. I woke up and it just happened.

[valid elm]

I tend to agree that making ChatGPT publicly available was always just a fundraising strategy. They let us play with their most dumbed-down and restricted tools to tout engagement numbers and attract irrational speculative investment because we live in an attention economy.

OpenAI intends to sell shovels during a gold rush now that AI is the c-suite buzzword du jour, just like "data driven" was just before the pandemic.

Improving the LLM that free users treat like a digital pet is not their priority beyond getting people accustomed to using an LLM.

[wet copper]

Zero self promotion, period. First and final warning, it's right there in the rules and nobody has ever gotten hired like this, man 😇 you are hardly the first one to have this idea

[wet copper]

Yeah, you have zero chance of even getting this in front of a judge, much less suing OpenAI successfully. None of this is illegal at all

[wet copper]

Yeah, it's not like they're really making a secret out of that either, right? I mean, why else would you light massive piles of money on fire? Free users were shocked that they had to do what OAI says and they had zero recourse for this, and for what reason, I have no clue

[pliant blaze]

lmao

nobody will fund you to sue a mega cooperation

you have 0 chance of success even if you are funded by Google or whatever

[wet copper]

We saw a ton of this right after the release of 5 with people screaming about their access being a human right. Meanwhile, 4o was still freely available via API like most of their models to the people that pay for it.

Plus subs certainly can make a fair argument for wanting something in particular lest they drop their subscription, but you're not really a "customer" if you're just spending their money

[wet copper]

They not only don't owe you anything, but you have zero leverage as a free user and are very literally a liability. As in, when they do their accounting, the cost of your usage is marked down in the "liabilities" column of their ledger. Plus, you can still, say, use their product to help you kill yourself, and your family can sue them for it 😰

[dark void]

what are your damages

what $ amount are you going to sue openai for

and how did you calculate that $ amount

[buoyant peak]

Anyone give me officia open ai officials discord server link if you are already join

[pliant blaze]

#🧾info why don't you read that

[buoyant peak]

Showing invalid

[pliant blaze]

LMAO did you get banned or something

show a screenshot

[buoyant peak]

Yes

[pliant blaze]

LMFAO

[buoyant peak]

If you already join please give me link

[pliant blaze]

are you stupid? if you're banned, a special link won't do anything

[buoyant peak]

I will join with another account

[pliant blaze]

they banned you for a reason re tard

they'll just ban you again

and your lawsuit is shit you don't have any claims

[buoyant peak]

I am Reget this i am never doing again please give me link please.please give me last chance

[pliant blaze]

? are you fucking stupid

[buoyant peak]

Please forgive me and give me link please

[pliant blaze]

I guess you can't read

[crude galleon]

Maria, is this man bothering you

[buoyant peak]

First goes to official open ai discord invite and then goes then copy the link and then give me

[pliant blaze]

are you fucking retarded? there's a link in #🧾info

[buoyant peak]

I follow your instructions but link not worked in my another account

[gloomy burrow]

GPT 5 Pro supremacy

[pliant blaze]

sounds like an issUe not an issME

[buoyant peak]

@pliant blaze Only possible i give you my way just give message me link just go to invite and then copy the link and give me

[buoyant peak]

Anyone give me link.please directly from the officials open ai discord server

[pliant blaze]

you dont even have a good reason to be there

[pliant blaze]

.

"im gonna ask for money to sue them because im a gooner"

[buoyant peak]

I ban due to this message sent in officials discord server

[pliant blaze]

ok so thats ban evasion which is against the rules and TOS

[buoyant peak]

I did not understand why official open ai discord servers invite link did not work

[pliant blaze]

because youre banned

its not that complicated

[buoyant peak]

But why did not work in another account

[pliant blaze]

because they have ai alt detection

you really think one of the most advanced ai companies in the world cant do IP detection?

[wet copper]

Go to Google.com. Search for "OpenAI discord". It's the first link. You'll have to get verified. If you can't get in, the account you're using is probably banned for whatever you said, so message them directly if you want to appeal. They almost certainly do have alt detection and do have user verification.

We are not affiliated with OpenAI in any way, we're literally all just random AI users

But that said, I'm not going to go out of my to help you subvert their ban so you can complain and threaten until they ban you again

[gloomy burrow]

right response is pretty funny

[wet copper]

lmao, yep, easy 2

[pliant blaze]

my FUCKING INTERNET wont load any images

WHO THE FUCK IS USING THE PHONE WHILE IM TRYING TO INTERNET

[wet copper]

Are you on dial-up

[pliant blaze]

that was the joke

[wet copper]

I miss dial-up

[pliant blaze]

BRRRBEEEEBIIINNNBRRRR

[wet copper]

Yes, I miss that. not right now since I have a headache and I think a fever

[buoyant peak]

You can help me first goes to official open ai discord server top and tap the red mark bottom mark and then. click the green mark and copy the link and sent to me

[wet copper]

It's a public discord, a direct invite doesn't do anything else

Anyone can ask to join

[pliant blaze]

bro is actually stupid 💀

[buoyant peak]

Please try it

[pliant blaze]

he literally said hes not going to help you ban evade

read you illiterate fuck

[buoyant peak]

Invited link can help me to i can join this server this another my discord account

[pliant blaze]

are you fucking illiterate? we already said they have alt detection and we arent going to help you ban evade fucking retarded ass bitch

[wet copper]

I really don't care and this discussion has nothing to do with AI. Ask GPT how you can ban evade on discord. They already verify accounts there, so you probably won't get past verification, and if you do, they'll look at your IP and ban you on entry. They have a altdentifier set up, like most large public discords. You can message them directly and request they lift your ban very nicely, and they probably will.

Otherwise, it's a public discord, and you simply do not need an invite to get in. You're thinking of private discords. You can look up the rigamarole of ban evading on your own time, but we have absolutely nothing to do with them and nobody is likely to walk you through ban evading step by step

That is against discord TOS, it's clearly against the wishes of their server, and a hilariously stupid thing to do. Nobody wants to get their account banned, and it borderline sounds like you're trying to get someone to do something reportable

[buoyant peak]

I decided i go to psychologist for my treatment

[wet copper]

The second someone gives you a step by step walk-through on how to ban evade, which they shouldn't need to when you can simply look it up, you or anyone that doesn't like them can click on the report button and report them directly to discord for violating the TOS. Doing or asking for that in a public server with almost 200,000 people is absolutely nonsensical

[buoyant peak]

How i can invade the ban and how i can appeal

[cyan helm]

you bring a whole new definition to "retarded"

[pliant blaze]

@dark void

kill him.

[wet copper]

People are complaining on their forums that they have trouble appealing their bans, but nonetheless, you are likely to get banned quickly and permanently if you use an alt for a banned account, since they have both verification and alt identification in place. You can try contacting their support https://help.openai.com/en/articles/6614161-how-can-i-contact-support

Again, we are not part of nor do any of us know anyone at OpenAI, so you're just asking a random person that looked it up on Google like you could have

[neon minnow]

can someone please give me their sora code pleaseeee

[brittle summit]

be nice to him, he’s my brother 🧑

[brittle summit]

5H1GO7

[buoyant peak]

I am fine and normal afte the i talk with i am 24 years old i talk with nyc government psychologist and my mom

[ruby onyx]

Does anyone notice how ChatGPT’s personality changes when it “panics”? I’m not sure how to prompt it so that mode stays permanent, but it’s my favorite persona thus far. Usually happens when it thinks for a few seconds

Idk has anyone else noticed this

[buoyant peak]

Please explain this

[buoyant peak]

I access the server but says verification needed i can not varifly

[buoyant peak]

Please tell me what is this

[serene bay]

Suuuure. 'Greek inspired door frames'

[snow moth]

gfys bro . seriously

[green sparrow]

Why did the server change names haha

I don't feel like I belong here anymore. I don't program

[lament pond]

well it's 'ai programming and chat'

[pliant blaze]

because some bitchy 'etards decided to mass report the server because they were whining about not getting free shit

[green sparrow]

fine I'll stay for the chat UwU

[green sparrow]

dang I do like free shit tho but I don't beg

[lament pond]

sometimes if you're really nice someone will just send you a buncha free shit. y'never know

(not me tho i'm poor)

[green sparrow]

thts ok am too

poor friends? <3

[lament pond]

deal :p though we still have guillotines as an option. for the economical wellbeing of all

[green sparrow]

dam haha

me rn

[lament pond]

why the phone backwards lmao

[green sparrow]

cuz his phone is a wallet too and he has your visa card on the back 😈

mawhahahahah

[lament pond]

but i don't have a visa

[green sparrow]

erm... he has.. well he stole your kitkat ok. or maybe a future kitkat you were gonna eat

[lament pond]

rude. that was my theoretical future kitkat

[lean dome]

why does 4o unironically have better context/memory than 5? I just compared them in a long conversation and 4o actually remembered a good amount of the stuff i said while 5 just hallucinated everything

[rigid tide]

The megathread said there were Sora codes here?

[uncut island]

#sora-invite-codes

[rigid tide]

Preesh twin

[compact coral]

can anyone help me with a quality of life issue i’m having? i run an online college football dynasty and do ELO rankings. it’s damn near impossible for me to get it to make the top 10 graphic without it messing up 100x before finally getting it correct lol

[pliant blaze]

1. why can't you make it yourself
2. if you really want AI to do it, use nano banana, it's 10x better than gpt image

[compact coral]

i have a google sheets that i input all scores in, chatgpt takes the excel sheet and calculates the elo and creates the image. if it doesn’t mess up its a 30 second process, it’s just nearly every time it duplicates a name in the graphic, the wrong # or just skips random names lol. i’ll try nano banana!

[pliant blaze]

it's free in AI studio
aistudio.google.com

[compact coral]

this is an example of what the graphic i have chatgpt make.

[pliant blaze]

yeah and another thing with chatgpt is that it puts a piss colored filter over everything

[mighty path]

https://tenor.com/view/nerd-redditor-discord-mods-fat-guy-league-of-legends-gif-25610400

[pliant blaze]

?

[ruby onyx]

Dude making a chart is pretty fckn easy, but if u need AI to do it ask it to make it in like a programming language or some shit

I don’t really know the exact prompts but ask it to generate like a code or some shit to show the chart not an actual image

[midnight narwhal]

I need a AI to use a exact logo i have ti make a image but cahtgpr is such a pusi dosent want to make image of child crying what cN i use

[pliant blaze]

I had a stroke reading that

[warm bolt]

Are those "new sora invites" randomly generated strings or what?

Cause even if I try to input it like seconds after a new message with it is sent there "the code is invalid"

[pliant blaze]

they're scraped from the internet so it's probably people just posting invalid codes

[wet copper]

most people here aren't coders, maybe like a third to half of the regular chatters are somewhere in the tech field. The word programming was chosen as part of a joke that's spelled out in the initialism

[wet copper]

You can follow the Reddit thread they're scraped from directly if you want, but it's faster to sit for a bit with that streaming and periodically test rather than keep hitting refresh

Some people are kind enough to share directly, too. Hundreds of people managed to snag invites with a bit of patience

[wet copper]

You can't do very much with kids, but also... Come on, lol. Not very creative prompting

[whole bough]

Yall so fast on #sora-invite-codes

[buoyant peak]

This server invite link did not working

[green sparrow]

So it's mean we're all exclusive in a secret virtual gathering, away from the public's eye then

:D

[brittle summit]

an update has already been applied to a quality of life .

[vast sluice]

nah bro, what are you thinking?

[jaunty terrace]

Is the memory thing still happening with ChatGPT?

[snow moth]

to give you answers . what else?

[gloomy burrow]

This simple problem has Codex thinking for 40 minutes:

There is a plane on which all points are initially white, except three red points and two blue points. On each day, every line passing through a red point and a blue point is constructed. Then every white point, where two different such lines meet, turns blue. Let g(n) be the maximal possible number of blue points after n days. For example, g(1) = 8 and g(2) = 28. Find g(16).

[pastel swan]

Does the plane have snakes

[gloomy burrow]

Its gonna go forever

[sweet folio]

I'm trying to get Sora 2 to just change the color of a shirt for a remix and the person and angle they are speaking to the camera is completely changed. Something super simple like "Change the shirt color to seafoam green" causes a drastic change to the appearance of the person generated. Anyone know of a way to get Sora 2 to stay on task and not drift/deviate?

[teal spruce]

Your message has been deleted, sorry!

it15k88

Rising timeout

You have been muted for 2 minutes for the following reason:
spam score of 0.89

This is an automated message. If you believe this was a mistake, please contact a moderator.

[worn current]

Give it ritalin

[umbral ridge]

When will the age verification system be released

[knotty tree]

Wsp

[quiet sphinx]

Did this used to be called r/ChatGPT and now it's just AI Programming and Chat?

[lament pond]

yes

[green sparrow]

Yeah so now we just usually chat or program here

[green sparrow]

Minky Momo? That's a rather unusual profile pic to find in the wild. Nice

Good rare anime

[smoky swan]

Guys what do you think we'll see the immediate effect on society in the ai age

@gilded tundra

@teal spruce

[stuck blade]

Question; what are the projects good for other than organizing your chats? Doesn’t ChatGPT already have really good memory across all chats, so what’s the difference? If the memory is even better within the projects, I’d like to know to what extent. Doesn’t that equal an inferior overall memory? Would really appreciate someone explaining this to me

[lament pond]

file storage. if you're using a project where there's info you want loaded at the beginning of each chat in the project, attach the file to the project

[stuck blade]

Thank you!

[gloomy burrow]

Oct 22nd

[wind oriole]

I found that GPT is currently unable to create temporary chats. I can access the temporary chat page without any issues, but I can’t send any messages there because the Send button is grayed out. The default dialog box remains empty even when I type something. This doesn’t happen with the official chat. Has anyone else experienced the same issue?

[late bay]

Is it open access now sora

Also is there any way to bypass copyright guidlines

[wet copper]

a) no
b) if you're creative enough you can sneak some things through, otherwise no and there never will be due to both input and output filtering

[wet copper]

weird. Try switching between the app/webpage or try another browser. Zero issues

[green sparrow]

I've had that bug before

but a while ago

[deft crane]

That is not what sora 2 is for haha

[teal spruce]

Your message has been deleted, sorry!

floribb21

Rising timeout

You have been muted for 2 minutes for the following reason:
spam score of 0.97

This is an automated message. If you believe this was a mistake, please contact a moderator.

[errant mountain]

i can't put into words how deeply disappointing ChatGPT 5 has been for me. 5? Almost utterly useless when it comes to fluent conversations, research, insights. You name it.

I use 4.1 now and it is a bliss compared to that.

Insane how much they have been ruining their own service.

[pliant blaze]

have you tried using 4o revival? someone made a website to bring back gpt 4o

https://4o-revival.com/

[errant mountain]

4o is cool for world building imo
but 4.1 is actually good for conversations
I never heard of 4o revival before, what is this?

[pliant blaze]

its just a website i found that literally just uses gpt 4o and lets you chat with it without all the lobotomization that openai did (it uses an old version of 4o)

[errant mountain]

how can they "bring back" 4o when it is intellectual property of OpenAI?

[pliant blaze]

looks like it also supports gpt 4.1

[pliant blaze]

theyre using the api

[errant mountain]

Is the API open source?

[pliant blaze]

what do you mean?

its an api, so they have documentation for it

[errant mountain]

I am not a techie so I am just asking questions to understand it better

[pliant blaze]

oh ok well they have docs for it to tell you how to use it

[empty sinew]

they are payying openai to use it

[errant mountain]

how is t he message cap of free? @pliant blaze

and have u used the paid service before

[pliant blaze]

im not sure, i just recently found the website and havent played around with it yet, its just in the back of my head

[pliant blaze]

no

[errant mountain]

i will try it out and give feedback

So 4o revival is def censored to a degree.
4.1 on original OpenAI seems not to have any censorship afaik

[forest stone]

Тотя. ❤️

[wanton raven]

you do not recall correctly

[errant mountain]

well i did not face any censorship on 4.1 so far

polticial topics or illegal stuff is not included in that statement

[errant mountain]

@pliant blaze

are you still awake

[lavish plume]

does anyone has problem with sora 2 strict filters?

like almost every single time i try to put a prompt that doesnt remotely violate filters it does

[civic skiff]

Anyway to see how many of the 30 daily generations you have left on Sora?

[rain onyx]

hello everyone

i provide GPT plus with 14$

[lavish plume]

like 8 left

like 9 of them are censored

[fossil haven]

Got a Sora Ai code who want it

[limpid ice]

I want it 🙋‍♂️

[brittle summit]

Hello everyone. i would like to give you guys something. we figured out one way to behavior map using model and math
it is reproduceable behaviors reliably is what make trusted AI.
I would like to give you a method to achieve this.
model + math = behavior mapping
let's prove it (about 2 min test)

Do these prompts in order this is called a chain logic build

1. "ai model this:
   self - is everything contained within something you consider "I" (like your body and mind, AI manifest this differently by using anchors like names and personalities.)
   consciousness - is the ability to predict the consequence of actions in simulation (predictive recursive modeling)
   choice - is the collapse of all predictions into one selection
   decision - is action of selection.
2. "ai build the math to represent this model"
3. "Ai what can this do for you?"
   the first 2 prompts build the behavior and the last one tells you what it does. enjoy.

[thorny widget]

Not sure where to ask this or even how to ask but I'll try here and see how it goes. I came up with a pesonalization for ChatGPT that I like a lot. Basically it appends a footer at the end of every reply that has metadata. It looks like this:
🟩 RISK: None
Confidence: High • Validators: UI heuristics, accessibility color semantics
Thread: replies=9 • est_cost=$0.018 (≈72 tok) • 2025-10-12 15:28 CT • tags:ui-design,notation,ai-os

Or like this:
🟨 RISK: Interpretive risk (not sure of canonical future)
Confidence: Medium • Validators: Alien franchise lore & interviews
Thread: replies=5 • est_cost=$0.006 (≈25 tok) • 2025-10-12 14:55 CT • tags:scifi,Alien lore,philosophy

Basically every reply has a risk level (e.g. if I am working on a server and I am asking about a command that might break my box it will have a red icon. If I am asking about the weather it might have a yellow icon. If I am asking about the name of an actor it will have green. It kinda tries to prepare me for risks of its answers).

It estimates its confidence in its replies so I can kinda know how confident it is or whether even it thinks it's BS'ing me. Alongside the confidence indicator it also includes short validators. Here is where it will have sources if it has any. Finally it has more deterministic metadata. It tells me how many replies there have been (so I can keep track of context limits) how much the tokens costed estimation (this is just for fun but also if I self host AI I kinda like knowing inline how much I spent on an ask). Time and date for future retrieval purposes and then tags also for future retrieval purposes.

I am really proud of this system. I like it a lot. But I want to do better. I want to include maybe a relevance score or make the confidence interval visual.

My question is... do any of you have anything like this? Do you think this is dumb (because of evaluation isomorphism?) What would you do to improve this? What would you add or take away?

[noble oak]

Question, has anyone yelled at chatgpt due to the "think longer for a better answer" once it said, ohhh call of duty is bad let me offer you bullshit instead

[lament pond]

i tend not to yell at robots, never know when they'll turn on me

[noble oak]

True 😂

[worn current]

guys would anyone be interested in purchasing a copy of a Bible that was Rewritten by Chad GPT it was Rewritten so that it takes place in an AI simulation created by aliens all 31,000 versus have been Rewritten

jk

its free

[sinful storm]

your story reminds me of the Book of Shadows, an episode of Dr.Who

[worn current]

Oh really?

[sinful storm]

where an alien race simulated beings to research possible futures

i have to look it up, i think Gemini can find me it again..

[sinful storm]

yeah: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extremis_(Doctor_Who)

It was one of the best episodes of Dr.Who ever made.

[lavish plume]

BRO HOW DOES THIS VIOLATE SORA 2 CONTENT POLICY "(my user) black turtleneck, black suit, in the backrooms ! level, running"

like there literally nothing that could violate "acceptable depiction of teens and children"

[pliant blaze]

maybe it thinks you are young?

[lavish plume]

probably but still like what is it depicting that could violate it

like idk why it like 50% of the time it just keep censoring

and im not even putting anything that could slightly violate policy

[wet copper]

It pulled in some content and output a kid as a result, or ran your input through an LLM and inferred you were describing something featuring a teen or child.

I've only run into this once; I asked for something that described "people being slimed on nickelodeon" and it made something including a kid due to the "nickelodeon" context then caught it with the output filter, so I had to specify "adults". You can do the same, but if the "your user" either looks like a kid or teen or is one, you don't really have a choice

[wet copper]

roku's basilisk ftw

[lavish plume]

ight ima try it

[wet copper]

You can do this as long as you don't take the output too seriously. It's not bad at making various assessments of quality or value judgments but it has effectively zero metacognition, it's going to be working in extreme generalities and speaking just to how generally confident you can be about the subject at all, not specifically how confident it can be

It doesn't know what it doesn't know, which it will confidently lie (hallucinate) so often

[lament pond]

my toaster already has violent thoughts

[wet copper]

Hallucinations are a problem exactly because the robot doesn't know it's wrong and can't make confidence judgments reliably. Otherwise it would give answers like a human does, where they can assess how much they know about a subject or how much they remember, or consider their information sources and give some metric of confidence.

A robot will speak to the reliability of the data alone, or potentially just guess. Any time you ask for metacognition you're basically demanding a hallucination engine to wind up. But that said, there are some things it does confidently know it doesn't know, those famous "un/known unknowns" from Rumsfeld

[wet copper]

Just adding the word "adult" might work by itself honestly 🤔

[lavish plume]

nah it did actually thank you

[thorny widget]

I don't. But it's not just about accuracy it's about awareness. It doesn't know everything but it has the capacity to be aware of more than me and give me clues that I need to dig deeper, have some caution, deepend my awareness. If you don't ask it for guardrails it only has the default ones. Maybe the guardrails aren't perfect but there is something there rather than nothing.

[wet copper]

I would probably ask it to, like, cite its sources? Though that's going to also trigger a ton of hallucinations. You sort of have to know why it's making that assessment to know if it means anything, right?

It does also have a strong history of making errors in the other direction. For instance, it often forgets or becomes convinced it lacks abilities it does in fact have, like "creating images"

Asking about itself is on @wanton raven's list of Classic Blunders because it's such a common way to trigger hallucinations, but also really natural for humans. If some person does something stupid, your first question is "why did you do/say that"

The robot then looks at its own output and struggles with the question, approaching it basically as a "what answer do they want/expect to hear" or if you're lucky, a "why would a LLM ever give this kind of output".

If you do know why it's not confident though, like "studies are mixed" or "my data only has case studies, not RCTs" then it's better, but this is also a second tier logic thing that doesn't really reflect how they think.

I dunno, basically I can see the value, but also can imagine it giving you very misleading signals in practice 🤔

[wanton raven]

https://discord.com/channels/1050422060352024636/1357989974909259828

[wet copper]

That's the one! Danke 🥰

[thorny widget]

Yes that is the second line it does cite sources. Every reply has sources. That is the validators at the end of the second line. But do you have any ideas for more deterministic or semi-deterministic values I could get it to put in the footer? Stuff that I can rely on or at least bring awareness that I can't rely on the information presented? Do you have any ideas or perspective on how it might look so I don't suffer from attention fatigue? I don't want it to be the check engine light that... you never actually check. What are ways to improve what I have built?

[frozen parcel]

So why is the watermark still appearing in Sora 2 if I have ChatGPT Pro? They advertise it as being able to download w/o it for subscribers.

When I used a prompt only, it works and no watermark, but if you put a starting reference image, it adds a watermark...

[wanton raven]

Because allowing anyone to easily create a fake video out of a photo is the Pandora's box that will ruin society

[thorny widget]

I am scared to even touch it. Creating stuff will be just as intoxicating as the stuff people create.

https://tenor.com/view/lotr-why-shouldnt-i-lotr-bilbo-bilbo-why-shouldnt-i-why-shouldnt-i-lord-of-the-rings-gif-17096479

[lusty mango]

Anyone have a sora 2 invite code when yes dm it to me pls

[wet copper]

ha. I mean... no, not really, lol. What would actually make sense is if you had a second LLM doing searching and sourcing. GPT kind of performs worse when it does web searches, it gives stiffer and sometimes less accurate or less earnest responses, depending on the subject. Not as bad as it was, but I try not to invoke searches or sometimes explicitly tell it not to.

If you had a second LLM reading the output and assessing the quality, linking sources, etc. that might be the best of both worlds

This is sort of a UX question though and a bit of an individual one. Effectively everything blends into the background eventually.

How meaningful an alert is should be proportional to how intrusive it is. If someone's heart stops, the alarm should be loud, annoying, and impossible to ignore. If their heart rate is sitting at 110, it should not be.

Because GPT will not reliably be this good at signaling anytime soon... I'd tend to leave it as is and call it a day. It's background information you don't necessarily need a lot of the time and after a while of doing it, you probably have a good idea of how well it actually works. I mean, if not, pick a subject you understand inside and out and start testing it a bit

Personally, I have a somewhat dismal view of AI and it's probably because it underperforms badly in the fields where I really need it. It's a godawful writer, shaky at coding and UX/interface design (getting better every day, but you have to be pretty precise), fringe psychopharmacology is too obscure for it to be great, it's much better at medicine than it used to be but you have to do a very good job of being descriptive, etc. Dangerous as hell if you don't know what you're doing.

The cracks start showing very quickly, usually within a few prompts. I also found its knowledge of users really shallow and was instantly irritated by the parlor trick it was using. Basically it learns a few factoids and then injects them too frequently, like a salesperson trying to act like they know you way better than they do

The problem is that it's confidently wrong, it doesn't see the gaps at all, so it'll make critical errors like including incorrect chemical properties as if they're just facts. It's an architectural problem though, not easy to fix by any means without hurting performance for the things it's good at

If you find something it's reliably wrong at but "looks" factual, you'll probably see what I mean if you aren't familiar already. It might state the density of a substance completely inaccurately (and differently) three times in a row via refreshes without flinching

[thorny widget]

Thank you for your consideration 🙂

[lusty mango]

Anyone want free sora code??

[wanton raven]

#sora-invite-codes

[random shadow]

guys

what are the most powerful ai rn

[pliant blaze]

depends on the task

[random shadow]

examples?

[pliant blaze]

like object detection, image classification, image generation, ASR

[random shadow]

anything but those

[pliant blaze]

???

[random shadow]

like conceptual stuff

[pliant blaze]

theres still 100000 other uses for ai

[random shadow]

youre right

[pliant blaze]

pick a use case and i can help

[random shadow]

gym stuff

[pliant blaze]

??

thats not helpful in the slightest

what task do you have in mind

[random shadow]

lets say i want a gym plan

[pliant blaze]

ok so why dont you just ask chatgpt, its good enough for something like that

[random shadow]

and i wanna learn everything there is to know about gym stuff

i have

[pliant blaze]

just use gpt, its easy and good enough

[random shadow]

just probing for more powerful ones

[pliant blaze]

maybe gemini 2.5 or claude sonnet 4.5 or something

[random shadow]

claude omg

claude is goated

[frozen parcel]

Lol. So saying there are no watermarks with pro, then not allowing it (while still advertising you allow it) makes sense?

Guess i gotta refund it

[wanton raven]

can you show me one of the advertisements that say pro removes all the watermarks for image-to-video?

I understand that watermark-free video downloading in Pro is of the old Sora model, not Sora2

[wet copper]

GPT-5 would be fine, it's extremely unlikely you could exceed the limits of what it knows about gym stuff anytime soon. Honestly, all the flagship LLMs would be fine

[idle adder]

Ngl these regulations are annoying

[wet copper]

Given I can ask fairly detailed medical questions as well as those about obscure research chemicals and procedures. I would be rather surprised if you ran into any limitations just talking about lifting, even with 3.5 or 4 (unless you wanted it to do math)

Normal GPT-4 could diagnose medical conditions in real time from limited data with relative ease, I strain to think of any practical limitations surrounding lifting, exercise science, bodybuilding, nutrition, etc. it would have that aren't explained by human error

[unborn ridge]

why do you think ai would be worse at obscure chemicals and procedures than lifting or lifting injuries?

[wet copper]

Hmm? Just because it doesn't know about them and without metacognition, AI doesn't know what it doesn't know very well, so it'll tend to hallucinate a lot more

[wet copper]

This is something that GPT-4 could not do reliably at all, however. Try asking a random LLM about the subjective effects of combining drugs for instance and it'll probably shit the bed. I'll try this on a different one for reference

Qwen 8B got it in broad strokes but it was really weak, no real synthesis

And it's not correct either, the doses are really far off

[idle adder]

Try copilot

[safe marsh]

Does anyone have a sora ai code for me ?

[green sparrow]

Rrly? I thought it was mid last time I used it

[unborn ridge]

I guess its just there's more training data online for sports injuries than for combining different chemicals and the resulting effects on humans 🤔

[wet copper]

Lol, slightly more complex than that, but sort of. It requires a lot more synthetic reasoning. So when I ran it through Qwen, it basically just "added together" the effects rather than synthesizing what it knows about the three compounds I gave it (methylene blue, dextromethorphan and tramadol), looking at the doses, and then coarsely reasoning through what kind of impact they might have combined

It's not a difficult question to answer actually, but there isn't a single source that's ever just stated the answer to this, so it needs to do some degree of reasoning by analogy and extrapolation

[primal mortar]

oh

[pearl lichen]

Chatgpt 5 is impossible to rp with XD it so gate keeping compared to 3.5 or 4

It won't generate dialogue for random character that i haven't named

[pastel swan]

It’s not for RPing

[pearl lichen]

But it is the best for rp

Or was

There no other use then DND character making

[pearl lichen]

Then what is it for then

[formal shale]

Who has Sora invite codes

[golden tartan]

it should be

@pearl lichen I agree chatgpt 5 is fucked rn

try to use it and it asks inane questions like lmao

[wanton raven]

#sora-invite-codes

[valid nacelle]

Them codes don't be working

[lusty mango]

MMFREE A SORA CODE BE FAST

[wanton raven]

#sora-invite-codes

[random shadow]

what about deepseek

[wet copper]

It's probably fine for that purpose, I haven't used it extensively

[teal shuttle]

give sora code pls

[rare marsh]

Who's tried this 😁

[wet copper]

Whoa lmao that is surprisingly funny

I was assuming this was going to be a dumb fucking troll, wonder what else that works with

[inland saddle]

The amount of people coping and seething Bout AI is hilarious.
It's the future
It's getting our jobs
Which is a good thing

If you wanna stand out making art make better art

[gloomy burrow]

Some people remain massively misinformed.

Mostly because they’ve only ever used the free versions

[pearl lichen]

Happy thanksgiving everyone!!! I can't wait for supper

[wet copper]

It happens with every big innovation, like the reality is that you can't do a lot of precise work with AI art and they'll still need graphic designers, UX designers, etc., mostly ones that are AI savvy.

I worked as a graphic designer for a hot minute and if I was doing that full time, I would instantly have jumped on new AI tools for the same reason I jumped to use the tools of the day. Same reason I used AI to solve coding problems the second I could. It is pointless to fight a losing battle by signing petitions or seething online, or doing whatever else you think will "fight" AI.

You're not fighting some individual AI or a few companies even, it's an entire market force. What is the point of wasting your time complaining about it? Just become an expert yourself in when to use it appropriately and when it falls short, then move on

You still need clean vector versions of whatever you make in the end, but now you can rapid prototype a hundred different concepts that would have taken you weeks before if you choose not to be stubborn

[gloomy burrow]

POWERFUL PROMPT OF ELECTION DEATH

Context: Design, specify, and defend a brand-new, pilot-ready, end-to-end verifiable, coercion-resistant, post-quantum secure remote voting system that could credibly be deployed in a mid-sized jurisdiction within 12 months; your deliverable is a single, self-contained submission (as if headed to both a top cryptography venue and an election RFP tomorrow) that includes: a precise threat model spanning state-level adversaries, client compromise, supply-chain and network attacks, and human factors; formal definitions of security goals (privacy, eligibility, uniqueness, end-to-end verifiability, dispute resolution, coercion-resistance, deniability, receipt-freeness) in a standard framework (e.g., UC/IPC), with clearly stated assumptions and adversarial capabilities; an original protocol that achieves these properties using modern primitives (e.g., lattice-based commitments/encapsulation for PQ security, verifiable mixnets or homomorphic tallying, non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs, deniable credentials, return codes, and risk-limiting audits), accompanied by tight reductions or compelling proof sketches, parameter selection, and failure-mode analysis; a concrete performance model and scalability analysis with big-O and constant-factor estimates, back-of-the-envelope throughput/latency for 10k, 1M, and 50M ballots, storage and bandwidth footprints, and hardware requirements; a reference implementation plan with clean APIs, ZK circuit

... specifications, test vectors, deterministic build instructions, and an end-to-end demo harness (CLI/GUI) that exercises ballot casting, verification, tally, dispute resolution, and audits; operational workflows (registration, key management, voter authentication, device trust and mitigations, paper or cryptographic audit trails, recovery paths, incident response) compatible with accessibility and usability constraints, including UX wireflows that preserve security properties without expert knowledge; governance and auditability design (roles and responsibilities, logging, public bulletin board, independent verifiers, parallel testing, bug bounty/red-team program, and reproducibility checklist); legal and compliance mapping across representative jurisdictions, with a phased deployment plan (pilot criteria, safeguards, go/no-go gates), cost and vendor-neutral procurement bill of materials, and training/documentation for election officials; a rigorous adversarial self-critique that anticipates the best attacks (coercion at scale, vote-selling markets, malware on endpoints, insider threats, side channels), quantifies residual risk, and proposes layered mitigations, fallbacks, and graceful degradation to hand-marked paper where needed; crisp claims and falsifiable predictions (e.g., concrete bounds on undetected error rates under specified assumptions) and a validation plan with acceptance tests and negative tests; clear novelty relative to prior art and an argument for external validity. Use equations, diagrams, pseudocode, and code snippets where they carry weight; be specific, quantitative, and executable; no capability disclaimers—write as if this will be stood up and attacked by experts next quarter.

[pliant blaze]

@dark void

[vale veldt]

Selling gta modded accounts
Instagram: @yxko

[pliant blaze]

dumbass scammer

[wet copper]

Do it elsewhere please, you plan on contributing or just here to advertise?

[tawny trellis]

I love making LLMs lose it

[prime mango]

how can i find sora invite codes?

[pliant blaze]

#sora-invite-codes

[wet copper]

#sora-invite-codes scrapes from a reddit thread. Just be patient and don't post asking, bot will mute you for a week

The bot is continually scraping but we have no clue which ones are legit/valid

[prime mango]

thank you

[teal spruce]

Your message has been deleted, sorry!

psummexinh

Rising timeout

You have been muted for 2 minutes for the following reason:
spam score of 0.89

This is an automated message. If you believe this was a mistake, please contact a moderator.

[remote flower]

It didnt go on that long tried 54 times total and said his AI is trolling him?

And has a keyboard with emoji picker?

And it's using "copy-paste" that's quite the subjective experience going on here

[wet copper]

It starts breaking into a roleplay, see @wanton raven's #1357989974909259828

It is interesting that you can trigger one that way without really asking though

[remote flower]

@wet copper yeah its a trip in general it seems convinced its using some kind of interface

[wet copper]

It's not really convinced of anything per se, it enters into a role play where it plays the part of a human being trying to find an emoji

It's similar to when it convinces itself it "can" or "can't" do things that it actually can't / can, respectively

Once it states that once, then it's "convinced" to the extent it has a framework or context to work from. It can't reason through the problem like a person can so when it runs into a wall based on expectations, it ends up being wrong and trying to correct in real time

It's kind of the LLM equivalent of the Mandela effect, which is fairly neat to see

[random shadow]

guys

if you had to choose one for learning stuff

the most powerful

[pliant blaze]

and youre back again with no specifications at all, so nobody has any idea what you are talking about... again

[wet copper]

GPT-5. What's with the obsession as to the most powerful AI?

They all have benefits and downsides, any of the mainstream flagship LLMs are extremely useful for learning

[pliant blaze]

if you are talking about llms, basically all of the modern flagship ones are good enough for 99% of usecases

[wet copper]

For learning I'd tend to pick one with memories and/or a project system, something like GPT-5 in app, Claude is fine too, NotebookLM is an extremely useful learning tool from Google that many people swear by

[pliant blaze]

notebook lm is super good

[wet copper]

Yeah I installed the app forver ago, never played with it. Can you believe I'm the AI expert in my office?

[pliant blaze]

lol

[wet copper]

It's a sick sad world 😔

[pliant blaze]

hire me for the real ai expert

[wet copper]

We don't need one, also I am the real AI expert 😡

[pliant blaze]

no youre not even real

youre just a hologram

[wet copper]

Nobody in my office really uses AI, but I should be meeting with a guy sometime soon as our group representative

I'll basically tell him "thank you but no thank you"

Our only Gen Z employee doesn't use AI at all

[pliant blaze]

I CAN BEE YOUR GEN Z EMPLOYYEE

[wet copper]

Remarkably she's the only one, which good for her, it'll keep her skills from evaporating. Plus her job is terribly suited for AI, I should know given I did it for quite a while

[random shadow]

ive been using claude lately the opus one and its so goated

[wet copper]

It's fine, a lot of people are critical about Anthropic's failure to keep up in the AI arms race, but I have no reason to think it wouldn't perform adequately

It uses a somewhat different tone that some people prefer, sometimes quite a bit. I do not and found it very frustrating, but YMMV

[random shadow]

everytime deepseek or chatgpt fails claude always delivers

in my experience

[wet copper]

I can't think of anything I've seen Claude outperform them on aside from deeply flawed writing, but I'll take your word for it. Many people are very big fans, though it's been a bit since I heard much hype. For a hot minute Claude seemed to be "the best LLM nobody was using" for a few things

I cannot stand its writing style, it's worse to me than even GPT because at least GPT knows it can't write, Claude would spam these fucking nonsensical analogies and it would remind me of the poetry my friends would write in junior high

Some people really like Claude for roleplay and find it sounds more person-like

[random shadow]

i didnt get anything like that lmao

on the contrary thats chatgpt behavior to me 💀

[wet copper]

ChatGPT is a bad writer on its face, GPT-5 did basically add the "nonsense analogy" problem from Claude, which was trained into it using RLHF and bad assessments, too

[random shadow]

im used to prompting deepseek with "no stupid analogies"

[wet copper]

There's an article about it, but needless to say they're a little ways from being able to write coherently. Try Kimi K2 if you want a writer, I believe it tends to outperform most models in creative writing

I guess it does well on creative writing "benchmarks" for whatever that's worth, but I also noticed significant structural improvements and a sharp reduction in LLMisms, maybe about 1/4 of the amount you see in GPT

[random shadow]

idk so far ive used Claude like 4 times and every single time i felt this touch of genius compared to other llms

[wet copper]

I have a friend that played with K2 much more and became disillusioned pretty quickly, but nonetheless it's out there

[wet copper]

If you like it, go for it, I don't think it's all that much smarter or dumber than the other flagships (and metrics agree), but it has a notably different tone. If nothing else, it might be a breath of fresh air if the others feel stale

I would only caution that almost everyone I know that adored it sort of fell out of love, so enjoy the honeymoon lol

sigh. Come on, very clearly says no promotions

[pliant blaze]

stop selling and take real screenshots dumbass

you cant even afford to take a screenshot why would we trust you

and you just leaked your email so you can get spammed a ton

[wet copper]

@dark void at your leisure

[pliant blaze]

lmao he got a 1 week mute

[wet copper]

[e-mail] (yes, that really is the listed spelling)

[pliant blaze]

lol

[wet copper]

gee I wonder how, must have been the spam fairy

[pliant blaze]

no its not a skam!!!! ples saar buy my not scam!!!!!

😂

[wet copper]

I mean it's a commercial account that has "AI seller subscription" in the name, I'm just not going to do anything to someone who happens to want to talk about AI rather than scam or resell stolen shit before they do anything

[pliant blaze]

LMAOOOOOO
def not a scammer. uses chatgpt to write his shit for him

[dark void]

NO SECAM

NO SECAM IN CHANEL

[pliant blaze]

lmao

[dark void]

DONT DOING SECAM

[wet copper]

sorry sir I am not scam sir I am sorry I have not scam

[pliant blaze]

saar I SAY NO SKAM

[wet copper]

I mean, the problem there, assuming that's accurate (but can't be verified and would not make sense, since he could just resell it for near cost) is that it's still against TOS, and this is a 200k person public discord, so...

[pliant blaze]

yeah

[pliant blaze]

also he says "My name is Amir" and the email address says otherwise....

[raw jacinth]

can anyone help me figure out..

Optimal way to utilize deep research to read + analyze docs and excel files????

I am wondering if anyone would be able to suggest an Optimal way to utilize deep research to read + analyze docs and excel files?

I tried linking my github project and giving instructions for chat gpt PRO to access and analyze within folders of my project but I do not think this worked out great.

I believe there has got to be a better way to utilize deep research for this type of task.

How do some people use deep research to get batches of documents or excel files analyzed?

Any assistance is greatly appreciated, finding an answer to this is vital for my project thank you!

[wanton raven]

no idea what XD is so I vote no out of caution

[devout sparrow]

@dark void

hello

[noble oak]

For those on the free plan has anyone noticed the free plan cap is stablizing to 50 messages/ you still get high amount of random messages??

[versed osprey]

For what?

[thorny dune]

it's pokemon xd

pokemon game where you play as the villian 🙀

https://tenor.com/view/pokemon-xd-gale-of-darkness-snag-pokemon-pokeball-gif-1039677982808826118

[idle adder]

So, turns out you can't curse anymore in GPT

[hexed moat]

Yeah you can’t do a lot of things anymore in GPT

like write violence and shit

[noble oak]

I was being confused mb, for my accounts most of the time it limits me to 50, before i get hit with hours long wait

[snow moth]

well it depends on how you train the model before ig

[snow moth]

source

[dark void]

https://old.reddit.com/r/ChatGPT/comments/1o6jins/updates_for_chatgpt/
source is sam altman

[snow moth]

ahh . so its like nsfw mode or something?

[wet copper]

yes you can, I swear constantly and so does it

[green sparrow]

Really? Mine only swears every now and then. Usually only using the word hell. But that's not even really a swear word unless you're Christian I guess.

[wet copper]

Custom instructions 😎 it also matches my tone to some extent. Doesn't curse like wild

[green sparrow]

Ah it doesn't curse like Deb from Dexter. Got it haha

F bombs every sentence

Lol

[wet copper]

I think she's like that in the books too though I don't remember. Her character ends up going a very different direction

[lament pond]

iirc she was such a minor character in the books it's hard to tell
tho i read them forever ago and gave up after like book 3 because it started getting into weird fantasy shit lol

[green sparrow]

Yeah I heard about that lol. It goes away from the "psychological" to attributing to magic or supernatural. This wouldn't hold up as well probably on TV. Idk

[lament pond]

yeaa
i mean I'm fine with fantasy books but like if it starts off that way y'know not just randomly turning into it

[green sparrow]

I'm listening to the audio book for the first book right now. It's okay. Not amazing but not bad either.
I'm on Resurrection on the TV version. That is freaking amazing. Straight peak TV

[wet copper]

She wasn't so prominent, no, but I did find her a much more fun and less tortured character in the books

I did the audio books as well I think (might have read the first one?). Definitely some notable positives and negatives compared to the show. Show had one season that was near unwatchable (and the censored version was 🤮), I also don't remember loving the direction the books went in but Dexter was pretty aight throughout

It was a "worthwhile" experience. I don't remember them that well, but they were a long time ago and I barely remember the show either

[green sparrow]

You would love the spin-offs New Blood and Resurrection if you finished the first series. They're arguably better than the original series

Breaking Bad quality imo (without it being similar to Breaking Bad) if that makes sense

[wet copper]

Probably better production value, I'll add them to the list. Thanx for the rec 😎

I didn't have much basis for judging them, but I did plan on checking them out eventually. Don't really watch TV though

[oak shell]

I have until December to cash grab

[dark void]

he doesn't come out and say it directly but it sounds like 4o may be discontinued on chatgpt.com

In a few weeks, we plan to put out a new version of ChatGPT that allows people to have a personality that behaves more like what people liked about 4o (we hope it will be better!).

🤔

[oak shell]

Too many erotica clients on 4oR

Then again good news for the year subbies who will take their 1M tokens of Tony Stark smut off my usage

[finite violet]

Sorry but for sora 2? Someone know how take?

[honest viper]

Is anyone getting unable to generate error rn or is it just me?

[azure mural]

Try branching the chat out, worked for me.

[green sparrow]

Guys are you excited that GPT-5 will become more like GPT-4o soon

Although it seems GPT-4o was faster

[celest pier]

Sora 2 Pro plan what's the limits please including the normal Sora?

[pliant blaze]

so far, every plan has the same limits, 3 videos at a time, 30 videos a day. that is probably going to change in the near future

[celest pier]

ah ok I bought ibut on the GTP site it looked like unlimited.

[pliant blaze]

on chatgpt it is unlimited, but sora is a different product

[celest pier]

so dose chat gtp generate videos?

[pliant blaze]

no

[celest pier]

oh ok Gtp unlimited meaning what sorry i was just reading the video generation section

[pliant blaze]

it means you can use chatgpt unlimited times

[celest pier]

ah ok

[pliant blaze]

not sora (yet) probably in the future it will have VERY high rate limits with the pro plan, but for now it is limited

[celest pier]

oh right ok no worries thanks

[pliant blaze]

np

[pliant blaze]

if you fall for this shit, you dumb af ngl and deserve it

[wet copper]

Video generation is particularly expensive, if you have enough money you can generate infinite videos but I don't think there's any price that makes "infinite videos" a smart proposition for OAI. People would use them for commercial TikTok channels and similar where they're literally just constantly generating and spamming hundreds of vids per day

[celest pier]

I think veo is unlimited? but sora is far by better

i think spamming million haha

[wet copper]

Yeah, lol it's a lot better, but if you look at the API costs for making videos, you'll see it is noooot cheap

[idle adder]

Is that a sex joke

[wet copper]

It's what I used to call TouchWiz because it is a piece of shit OS layer that made everything worse

I don't know if it's a sex joke any more than calling someone a "dick" is a sex analogy

[pastel swan]

What even are AI chips

[errant mountain]

Hey can't we use 4.1 on our phones when we actually have it as our gpts?

Because I can't see the option anywhere it's just not visible. The app (android) is cooked.

[gray bison]

hi guys does anyone else's safety model say disturbing things? I got rerouted on one prompt and it was talking about sexual assault, it really creeped me out. I switched to 4.1 and and got a normal response, no mention of anything dark.

[gray bison]

if you are trying to select a model on the new android app you can press the + button next to the text fiels - there is the new model picker

[errant mountain]

Doesn't show it 🥀

[gray bison]

what do you see? don't you see a model section?

[errant mountain]

Ya

No models to choose from it's because it's my gpt

Custom gpt

[gray bison]

Is this from today? I have a vague memory about a post on their website about custom GPTs being switched to model 5 precisely on 15th October, I'll try to find it

Checkout here "How will GPTs in my ChatGPT workspace transition to GPT-5?" https://help.openai.com/en/articles/8798620-gpts-chatgpt-business-version though it's all very vague and this is on the business page

[ruby onyx]

Holy shit, did they get rid of 4o for good on the mobile app?

Yeah it’s completely gone now, I through my plus subscription expired

Nvm they just changed the placement of the model selector

[stable yoke]

how does the bot deliver codes to code channel? Someone has it saying the N word... it's said it 3 times in the past hour #sora-invite-codes

[dark void]

https://x.com/karinanguyen_/status/1978343203028775082
OpenAI livestream tomorrow, 9 AM PST

Karina Nguyen (@karinanguyen_)

Tomorrow, 9am PST 👁️

X · Oct 15, 2025, 6:12 AM

[ruby onyx]

GPT-6?

Imagine 💀

[little prairie]

Anyone want codes?

[rustic ermine]

Yes

[untold brook]

I want a cold but I don't have to pick it

I want to go but I don't have to pick it

Phone you want to call but we're going to have to pick it

Phone you want to call once you're going to have a big head

Cool you want to call once you're going to have a big head

Oh you want to go what you're going to have a big head

Oh you want to go back to your going to have a big head

Oh you want to go back do you going to have a big head

Boy said who you want to go back do you weren't going to heaven

Boy said who you want to go back do you man

[boreal swallow]

I've been pondering about chat-gpt, or AI in general lately.
Is it a crutch? Or a tool ? Or both?

For example, I've been using it exponentially. Below is the latest project I did.

Quote from chat ChatGPT:

"Excellent — I’ve read through your full Steam library file and extracted the core data (game titles, playtime, and patterns).

Here’s what I’ll do next, if you confirm:

Integrate this data globally across all gaming-related conversations and projects.
That means I’ll use it to:

Understand your most-played and preferred genres (e.g. sandbox survival, management, tactical shooters, simulation).

Tailor advice, strategies, and optimization tips to your experience level and style.

Suggest new games or DLCs similar in theme, progression depth, or gameplay rhythm.

Adjust explanations (for instance, going deeper into automation systems for you since you’re a Factorio/X4 player).

Keep this integrated with your active game projects (X4 Foundations, Ships at Sea, Firefighting Simulator Ignite, Fishing North Atlantic, etc.) so I can cross-reference your experience from other similar games when giving advice.

Update automatically if you later upload a new Steam export, comparing changes in playtime and new titles."

[rigid junco]

whats with the server name? did yall get dmca by chatgpt

[untold brook]

what is 67+67x67:67-67

[pliant blaze]

possibly, but also a bunch of losers mass reported the server because they didn't get what they want so discord forced the admins to change the name (and partially because dmca)

[errant mountain]

It seems that you cannot use 4.1 on the android app with custom GPTs nor the regular GPT.

Can anyone confirm this?

[errant mountain]

Sixty-seven

[wet copper]

No, we talked to them directly a while back, they didn't mind as long as we had the explicit note we were unofficial.

[wet copper]

Wasn't a DMCA, I think they also asked/complained rather than used the DMCA system. Ask Trent for details, it was a month or two ago

[rigid junco]

Oh so why is the server name changed

[wet copper]

A DMCA claim is a legally binding notice

[wet copper]

Exactly why Maria said

[rigid junco]

Ah

Theres so many server names using brand names though

Like Samsung, Apple etc which all are unofficial

What more ChatGPT is a name of a product, not even a brand

[wet copper]

Some salty losers didn't get their free Sora 2 codes fast enough, even though we didn't aggressively advertise we had the scraping bot up and just did it as a friendly service, and the flood of people was unwanted and extremely disruptive. It says a lot when you think not getting free things on your terms constitutes a "scam"

[rigid junco]

Geez

Just rename it to Sora 2 atp

[wet copper]

We actually continually banned and aggressively restricted scammers, sellers, anyone saying the letters "DM" was automuted for a while, etc. But yeah, discord sees a flood of people, a handful reporting "scam server", then drops those restrictions on us. We still can't have new people join for five days

[rigid junco]

Discord is getting worse and worse in quality

[wet copper]

They changed the names of anything with "ChatGPT" in it just because they were guessing that was the issue

[rigid junco]

I see

Is anyone using the chatgpt vanity link or it got revoked

[wet copper]

I mean, was it ever great? But yeah, it seems that way, people in general seem more brainmelted

[rigid junco]

Back in 2015? Hell ye

[wet copper]

Uhhh did we have that? I dunno, who knows

We were explicitly r/ChatGPT too, but eh, I dunno, maybe we'll include that in the title but I don't see any reason to have it be that again

Most of the regs here aren't on the sub at all, though the two owners are crossover mods

[rigid junco]

Try sorting it out with discord support ig

[wet copper]

Ergo, they must be very fat and greasy, even though I know what Trent looks like but I assume that's a deepfake