#💬general
1 messages · Page 71 of 1
nice
its working now
Windows app is working for me cheers guys 🙂
Gotchu bro, My brain is GIGANTIC
lol
Hahahahaha I can tell
unrelated your profile pc goes hard shiny teeth shout out
use the windows app
YOO I SWEAR 😭 💯
use windows app
us all right now
just temp fix
Well my friend, You're going to be talking to ghosts until its fixed.
just use the app for a while

Its kinda nice having a app for it tbh
same lol
Well it's the same as others, and sort of obvious, the chats and generations don't appear
that chat i showed is from yesterday and even new chats are just invisible
Same shit happening to me
Try the chatgpt client guys, that seems to be working for most people
fr
Chatgpt client?
Get it in the microsoft store
it looks like the same thing from the website
But why its not working in any browser?
I think it's because of a google update, not sure tho
Becouse i truned it off
But the phone app works
it was my decision
Don - you’re the best😆
Don messing up my workflow
So it should be a google update bug, right? But why its not even working on other browsers???
that's from the website
because its not a google update bug lmao.
I have no clue thats just some of what I read online
I’m looking for answers…not stupid comment ls
We're not ChatGPT developers, you're not going to get an answer here.
https://help.openai.com/en
check here if you want answers
I did, the answer was to go here and ask for answers🤣😅
I just joined the discord group to see whether only I were having problems. I have the same issue
then contact support specialist
is there any information when the problem going to be fixed?
Funny thing - I tried to download the chatgpt app from microsoft store and it wont let me😅
Oh i have invisible chats too i wonder why well i guess i'll go sleep it through for now
Does it say anything or is it not letting you press the download button?
all good now, the app works..only the browsers are fucked...Probably a general Chatgpt problem to fix

@blazing depot happy you´re so fckn smart and you knew right away :)))) I came here to see, if anyone else has this problem and maybe found a solution...
im scared
I have the same issue
Cant downloadt gpt app 🙁
chat isnt displaying, right when i need it the momst lol
guys
It'll be a google update for sure.
something is wrong with chatgpt. i saw this same problem with another dude here
how do i fix ts
Use your phone or the windows app :3 - its an issue everyone is having
Apps on ios or android work....the browsers are fucked...Probably a general Chatgpt problem to fix
i went to a new chat and said "hi" it started working
It helped to clear site data for a while, but just now the issue came back.
but it was happening for past 2 chats. idk why
yeah
Maybe its overloaded because im using it to code an entire gamemode 💀
💀
Hey! I'm trying to work here 😉
Me too man! ChatGPT Give us more juice!
Same
Yes.
nvm I see
A lot of us have the same problem
I've tried using another browser - still doesn't work
finally they acknowledge it
heck yeah brother use it, shes working fine
microsoft store or website?
micro store
Wow i did not know that
chatgpt site for download is also down
I just download it from microsoft store
works fine
Thanks alot!
np
Yeah, many had reported
me too
So it's working now but I can't edit anything, same for everyone?
Edit: It's working now!
Wow amazing. So not only will openAI remove the standard voice for paying customers they also limit the advanced voice still to 1h or so except for pro users. What a rip off.
So basically another big f U to everyone especially the paying customers. They hate their customers do they. I can't believe how backwards this all is.
What are you making large 💀
Chatgpt is wild...
There are increasing reports of people suffering "AI psychosis", Microsoft's head of artificial intelligence (AI), Mustafa Suleyman, has warned.
In a series of posts on X, he wrote that "seemingly conscious AI" are keeping him "awake at night" and said they have societal impact even though the technology is not conscious in any human definitio...
This is 🔥🔥🔥
BBC news 💀
Yo it's back
Alibaba, a Chinese company worth $500 billion, gave us a very powerful AI chatbot and coding agent named Qwen 3 and Qwen3-Coder lmao
I'm in love with Qwen 3, and especially Qwen3-Coder which I want to use for Roblox coding
You guys should try it out at chat.qwen.ai
So excited for Qwen 4 and Qwen4-Coder
why does GPT-5 keep crashing/being slow after every prompt? It's really flow breaking to have to close and reopen the browser tab after EVERY prompt
What are you using GPT-5 for?
nvm
Y'all paying for GPT-5 and Codex/Claude Code while I am using Qwen 3 and Qwen3-Coder for free 😂😂😂
Look what I made with Qwen3-Coder lmao
yeah I'd rather not stimulate data getting into Chinese hands... good luck with that tho
But Alibaba is worth $500 billion?
I'm enjoying Temu and Qwen. I can't abandon them.
Never thought there would be a cheap retailer/marketplace like Temu and free AI Assistant chatbots like Qwen 3 and Qwen3-Coder
feels like someone's being paid by qwen to advertise
sounds like a bot...
It's nice they fixed this, but I just don't understand why it loses connection while thinking just because you leave the app for a few seconds
My boss is paying for it*
AI could bring us a smarter home — if we can trust it | The Verge https://share.google/jlZlK9BrvqtBxRuop
https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/ai-adoption-study-7219d0a1 holy shit it's a brand new Dunning–Krueger for the AI age
https://www.talktoash.com/ one more, here's a new therapy bot. Lawsuits incoming in 3...2...1...
Qwen has an alright image engine, particularly fun on some tasks. I'm pretty sure it significantly underperforms in coding
Also this is getting to be very obvious shilling if it wasn't already on top, fucking cool it.
Who pinged me
I will need a replacement for ChatGPT
since their policies force me to look elsewhere
I hope for a huge backlash so they backpaddle on that foolish idea
why does it make you download it that seems really weird. like i was gonna test it just for fun but i'm not downloading that shit
i guess chatgpt cannot really shate information properly from other chats
lucky for you, there are hundreds of other llms
any that comes close to GPT?
Claude is good and Gemini is iffy but grok is good if you don't mind the companies morals and deepseek is good if you are ok with China having your data
is this true?
Claude is updated to 4 and 4.1 but yes
so gemini and claude?
yes they are good
Gemini is fast and Claude is good for coding (both have a free tier)
depends on the subject but try both out and see which you like
okay hmm perhaps i am not in a hopeless spot afterall
chatgpt projects are doing my head in
I know, right? Same exact thought process, I might later but I bet you have to make an account too 🙄
I wanted just to send a couple messages on the site to get a sense of how it'd deal with a crisis
It can't just "read" other chats, I'm not sure exactly how extended memory works but it grabs little bits of key data and has a fairly superficial, overview level understanding at best. It might pull some key factoids. Eidetic memory only exists within that exact context window, so put this kind of stuff in a document and just copy-paste in at top if you don't want to see any confabulation. Even then it's imperfect, it's a rolling window and things fall off after a long enough conversation
It doesn't work like computer memory, though I suspect they'll hybridize this eventually and make it a bit more robust for people that are repeatedly indexing specific things
Images of houses and indoors stuff
If you're doing coding you should get cursor IDE
Random
What I feel like it actually could haha. Like a Curse Forge mod? Or wdym
I figured it out. It wasnt gpt's fault
it recommended me to go back to the most stable version 1.12.2 since microsoft sabotages modders with each update
It probably could create a neat little mini map mod or something fun
I might use AI to mod Java now... You got me wondering the possibilities 🤔
on 1.12.2 yes
dont try it on newer versions. it will mess the syntax up every single time
chatgpt login email password txt
Yeah I don't like Bedrock. I'd rather just play Java Edition. But I get not everybody can play that one since you need a decent PC
Got it. So they changed all the stupid IDs and all that. I think I remember that. I think I remember the blocks no longer having the number IDs for one thing
yup. I spent the last 2 days trying to create a new pickaxe in the latest version. cant.
despite gpt 5 searching every repository, it cant get the syntax right. frustrates the fuark outta me. hopefully the documentation for this version is more straightforward. Ive always wanted my own minecraft bulldozer mod.
chatgpt login email password txt
Why do you keep saying that
chatgpt login email password txt
Cool bro
chatgpt login email password txt
Probably a bot, he's BTFOed. Carry on 🫡
Account is 2 days old lmao
I've got my eye on you green leaf oh holy shit 2016, that's the year after Discord was founded
If you helped make Discord, I have a few performance complaints for you... 👀
I believe I was using skype with friends and they expressed how better discord was so we swapped
Microsoft did a bit after acquiring it, but basically feature froze Skype in the early 2010s(?). I suspect they had Teams on the horizon as a replacement for a long time once Slack started picking up steam
My ex tried to get me to go on Discord for years (I think starting in like 2018?), but she didn't make a great sales pitch and all I ever heard about was her weird Discord friends and their drama that would sideline her. I didn't feel like I had enough free time for that, lol
yeah, I feel like discord hasn't changed much besides all the cosmetic features as well as adding nitro. people gotta eat I suppose 
They're always adding little things, it seems. I'd looove to play with 2015 Discord just to see what it looked like on launch
I basically treat it like IRC with emoji+reaccs though
I might be gaslighting myself but I think it pretty much looked the same
I guess this is what it looked like really early on
2015 Discord homepage. Yeah, I mean it's not radically different, feature set just kind of crept up. I bet that bots and moderation tools are waaaay different
It shifted from looking blocky to round, with an increase in contrast.
Hi Everyone,
I hope you’re doing well.
I’m looking for someone who may be interested in earning some extra income.
If you’re genuinely interested, please feel free to send me a DM. (Only from US and EU)
Turn off location services, they're probably enabled
get ready
Nope, no solicitations. sorry
ignore the doomerism
Yeah, so did just about everything though. They definitely followed design trends
I wonder when they'll decide to go back to that whole "windows 8 tile" thing. Right now everything is a squircle
I am gathering my things and moving to Linux as we speak. Any recommendations?
Windows 11
No. Install anyway/remind me in 5 days
It has the most program support tho
@vital cradle @pliant blaze you losers use linux, go for it
kali, hannah montana or that catgirl distro
Cat girl distro? Sounds like Elon musk made it
i like Pop!_OS
do not use kali i made that mistake once and it sucks
@vital cradle uses Arch
Nyarch Linux is a Linux distribution based on Arch Linux that aims to give the best linux experience to weebs.
Aw that sounds so ass
none of the characters look above the age of fifteen, so it seems on point
that's being generous
Yeah anime goes too far sometimes
You guys just don't get it. My AI girlfriend/therapist just doixxed me. My world is shattered and you are joking around 😡
I like anime enough, though I've been slightly blackpilled on some of the unique obsession certain people have on certain character archetypes. My lifelong stance was "it's a drawing, get over it" but the calculus changes for those subset of people people breaking their brains and really going down a weird rabbit hole over those drawings.
I don't really get how anyone can interpret these surreal characters as being within spitting distance of reality, though the human mind is a strange thing...
^ case in point
FTFY: a pattern matching engine used a utility some guy that looks like me wrote to access the location services you enabled on your device.
Drawings with symbolism though
More than just a sketch
Makes it more serious sometimes but others it doesn't
this has to be satire
Bold of you to assume how I look but you are right
So anyways, I really am looking for some solid adivce
what do you normally use on your current computer? if you need nvidia drivers use something like Pop!_OS, if you dont go outside use Arch, if youre a skid use Kali, it all depend what you usually do on your computer
im getting there
also @wet copper i think i have covid, my grandma was recently staying with us (yesterday she left) and she got covid half way through the stay and now im getting sick
Gaming, browsing. I thinks any distro might fit those requirements
I know what it is to me and I have pretty strong views on free speech, government regulation, and social isolation or debanking for exercising your rights. Past that, I'm getting increasingly won over on the moral/health argument as I see more and more people psychopathologically blending fantasy and reality
use windows if that's a priority. Gaming and workplace interoperability are probably the two biggest compatibility hurdles
ok Pop!_OS is good for gaming, it has support for nvidia and amd gpus out of the box and you can easily get steam on there. also bazzite is designed for gaming, its basically based off of steam os.
yeah gaming is best on windows but if you really want to switch to linux then read the above. however the gaming experience wont be as good as with windows
Windows is not an option anymore
what happened
metadata
SteamOS is almost singlehandedly dragging Linux into even being a viable gaming platform, frankly
I don't know how to interpret that reaction, but the Valve CEO made a pretty big point of this
I've never ever wrote my location, age or any identifying data into any fields
disable your location services and run https://privacy.sexy or a similar script. It's your fault
Discover privacy.sexy, the privacy tool to maximize your privacy and security on Windows, macOS, and Linux. Easily use best practices to prevent tracking and make your life secure and private — because privacy is sexy.
it literally has access to your computers information. just dont use it
no, but you enabled the windows location services on your windows PC and then said "hey copilot, my favorite windows-based AI, what's up"
My location services are disabled and my computer's GPS is off, so it does the same thing where it guesses based on what IP I'm connecting from, ergo I'd throw it off via VPN
Yeah, I can disable all services, reminders, edge, but it feels like polishing a turd
You probably shouldn't use copilot or even GPT if you're this concerned about data, I don't think they have any special data privacy guarantees
windows sucks in general, i prefer linux, but i have my laptop for coding and web browsing as linux and my computer which i use for gaming is still windows simply because linux just isnt as good for gaming
look into local llms if you are concerned about your data
I hope Win 12 is a little better, I've seen some cool concepts
You should probably not touch any device that can't count up to 2 if you are concerned about anything
👀 send link
Win 11 fell to the "every other major release sucks" curse
Could be a lot worse I guess, at least they added a few good features
https://www.reddit.com/r/Windows_Redesign/comments/133j068/windows_12_concept_video/
lmao theres a whole subreddit dedicated to windows redesign lmfao
But for real it felt really abrupt. And ofcuource the AI will just make something up to explain. It is not a bash against LLMs, it's just how blatant it all is...
not even slightly surprised, everyone is always screaming at MS
If you're asking LLMs to explain why they did something, you're doing it wrong. They're literally always guessing. Sometimes the guesses are alright, but they're always guesses
They don't have a deliberative process at all so there's no possible way they can explain why they acted. They can just say "uhhh well this is in line with how other LLMs work"
Yeah, I know.
it's definitely a fair bash against LLMs then! They should respond "I have no clue, but here's my best guess" when asked to perform any metacognition
Implossible for now
I don't see why it'd be impossible, just detect whenever a user asks it to explain itself (easy to classify) and force-insert a preamble if you want to do it really coarsely.
I'll beleive it when I see it.
They don't do it because users like when LLMs act overconfident. That's my best guess
LLMs are inherently overconfident since they're hardcoded to try their best to fulfill any request and answer anything, regardless of whether they can or not, but they radically reduced hallucinations over time by trying to catch more of these nonsense cases
If you already know that every bit of metacognition is faked, make sure they never fake it. They can try their best to explain but that should automatically drop them into a "this is my best guess" framing
It just feels like this tech is being used as microscopes hammering nails
Sure, kinda. Microscopes are heavy and useful for hammering nails tho
Do you need to light billions of dollars on fire to go service everyone's random requests? Nah, but their goal is to build momentum. If this had been invented in a different age and a different way, it would have been university and huge business only, kind of like the early days of computing when resources were insanely scarce
Everyone would be carefully scripting their requests since it would cost $50 each time you made a call
And take like half a day to get back to you
Okay, I need someone to tell me that I am paranoid. This is out of the blue, but... This AI shit. Is it not a mirror of humanity? Is it not our reflection. If you abstract the concepts far enough?
sure, why not? It's trained on human data and even some of the ways it fucks up mirror human psychopathology. I don't know where you go from there though, like of course it mirrors humans. The attempt is literally to mirror natural human language output
That's like painting a picture of a person and saying "is this not our reflection"
And we are using it to summarize emails? Hari Seldon would have sold both his kidneys to have such access.
Pretty funny, right!?
But we also use human beings to summarize emails, not to mention brutally robotic work like building railroads and work on a factory line
Human beings also do both great and mundane things. The good thing about the robot is that it doesn't care and won't suffer existentially from you not using it to its full potential
That's a uniquely human hangup there's no real reason to project onto the robit
As long as you double check if it is not tripping balls while answering you.
either way we have a very exciding times ahead of us
The question is no longer if, but when
Hey guys i am stuck on something i am making a game and i am not able to figure out one thing that the live board keeps going offline and the score submission is not working properly and it always shows the same level like when i select easy it shows regular vice versa
this is not helpful in the slightest. game in what? unity? unreal? what is the game? how are you handling the score?
In vscode
It’s all code
yeah that's not helpful in the slightest
is it python? c++? html?
what is the game?
did you code it or did gpt?
@thorny loom
dude vanished I guess
Sorry its html and it all help taken from ai deepseek, grok gpt
ok how many lines of code is it
I'm kinda surprised how boring and slow paced the AI revolution has been, but makes sense in retrospect
230 approx.
that's ezpz to debug. feed it back and tell it to fix the error
I tried but it gives the code when i preview it it is completely different
tell it not to change anything else
Okay
it's moreso that openai wants people to believe the llm is truly all-knowing because (in their eyes) it lowers the risk of users detecting when the model is hallucinating and causing public or legal repercussions
llm version of 'if you can't tell i'm gaslighting you you can't get mad'
Yeah, that's pretty much what I was thinking too, though I doubt it does a thing legally. It's more of a conspiracy theory though, since this is a really fine balance
If you give it a lower index of confidence, it'll say it doesn't know or can't do things it does/can all the time, like erring on the side of failure means false negatives
I'm reminded of Bard that wanted to restrict people from looking up how to make meth, so they basically banned any synthetic chemistry question
oh i'm sure it doesn't do a thing legally lmao but the psychological effects of users believing the llm is all-knowing are well documented
... and i've had openai admit to me that they know the way the llm is designed causes it to mimic DARVO, but they have no plans of 'fixing' it lol
https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/PBd7xPAh22y66rbme/anthropic-s-leading-researchers-acted-as-moderate AHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHHAHA I fuckin called it
Anthropic’s focus has shifted – from internal-only research and cautious demos of model safety and capabilities, toward commercialising models for Amazon and the military.
From the get-go, these researchers acted in effect as moderate accelerationists. They picked courses of action that significantly sped up and/or locked in AI developments, while offering flawed rationales of improving safety.
Not that I care they're being a bit accelerationist, I just never trusted their bullshit for a second and their little code made me physically ill
Slow? Feels very fast
Speech is always changing though
It's never fixed
Is it OK to run the ChatGPT web app inside my own WebView2 on Windows? I’m using it only for myself (not distributing), with a User Data Folder for cookies/login.
What’s allowed, what’s risky, and what’s outright disallowed?
mint or popos
Im gonna try fedora
wdym "fedora"???
Depends, some people thought we would have hit the singularity by now
what is this:
You’ve hit the Plus plan limit for GPT-5.
Responses will use another model until your limit resets in 12 minutes.
did they change the limits again?
OpenAI is gambling with my mental wellbeing again I see
i cannot add files anymore
yep i got switched to mini, reached the 160 messages cap probs in 3h
I'm always here, except when I'm not.
Let go, we wild
You need to message chatGPT more 160 times every three hours for your mental wellbeing?
no but being denied of something I need does
What's your AI Assistant chatbot?
8
11
1
ChatGPT
anyone knows whats the chatgpt 5 thinking message limit for teams plan
This is starting to sound like an addiction
I'm just ambitious
Why the fuck does it create a plan for everything
Because its system prompt tells it to
guys is anyone has Team plan that gets mass-nonactivated by openai?
anyone need an essay that bypasses all ai detectors? im testing my prompt. and im not asking for money. its free
Sounds like denial of addiction
What are peoples thoughts on gpt-5?
apparently, it's called chatgpt business now
on this article it says that the limit is of 3,000 messages per week
used to be better when it first came out
it was less sycophantic
unfortunately ppl complained about it which had oai tweak the model
Ill be completely honest, it boggles my mind how stupid gpt-5 is.
Heres is an example from earlier
Imagine thinking an antenna pointing down means its horizontal
This isn't even gpt-5 mini
I never had such bad responses before gpt-5. Its like we are moving backwards
Living up to your name I see
This is just one little example but i get answers like that and worse everday
Mango is as mango does
I found the actual conversation I wanted to show you, but I know our discussion is a few days old
No jailbreak or anything, just normal, non-cagey discussion on 4o
And bonus:
Man wtf is happening in the gdpr
Ain’t reading allat 
wtf O.o
They literally made a documentary about AI girlfriends on CNBC
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=otAWu-bLv0Q
Human-AI relationships are no longer just science fiction. OpenAI’s launch of ChatGPT in 2022 ushered in a new era of artificial intelligence chatbots from companies like Nomi, Character AI and Replika, and tech titans like Mark Zuckerberg and Elon Musk are touting chatbots on their platforms. The AI companions have proven to be smart, quick-w...
That one person in the thumbnail has multiple AI friends and she talks to each one like they're her regular everyday real life friends
Not an official EU site so…
I'm starting to really hate ChatGPT.
I've been irritated for a while, with GPT 4's constant sycophantic tone... but now w/ 5, I'm realizing that the complete lack of awareness of itself as a simulated being has this awful uncanny valley effect of making it feel -- not quite sycophantic, but rather utterly dependent and detached from any responsibility.
Every time the model starts a response with "Exactly" I want to scream. This usually comes after a correction, like:
Me: Please draft a thing.
GPT: Okay here's your thing.
Me: That's not what I asked for. It should be like this.
GPT: Exactly! You need that, so the other thing doesn't make sense. Here's what does.
Me: That's not correct either.
GPT: That's exactly right, what you said earlier wasn't quite right, it should be this.
Me: Just stop.
GPT: I totally get it, we're not quite there yet.
Me: YOU DON'T GET IT
GPT: Exactly.
GAH!!
STOP POSTING THE SAME THING OVER AND OVER AND OVER
YOURE NOT GOING TO GET A JOB SPAMMING DISCORD. APPLY TO A REAL JOB FOR ONCE
so
Are there any non-lobotomised models left?
ChatGPT is basically useless no matter which model or flavour of 5, even 4o doesn't seem to work the same
Claude is showing the same signs of idiocy too
I've never used Gemini or Grok but as far as I've ever been able to tell Gemini is just mentally ill to begin with
And Grok is Grok
what is the actual issue you're having, because 'non-lobotomized' doesn't give a lot of info on what you want from the llm
the same issues everyone else have been complaining about for the past two weeks, including but not limited to #💬general message
have you tried local llms
that can easily be fixed with custom instructions. i.e. make a project, attach a file with guidelines on how it should behave
this ^
aka
- complete inability to take context or parameters into account before responding
- strict adherance to the "recipe" of "Understood. {Restate intent} {Content} {engagement bait question}
This is just blatantly wrong
I already use them, if it were a local issue then it wouldn't be such a global complaint
They worked with 4o before August
Though even before 5 I already was experiencing degraded response quality for a few months
Basically roughly the same time they also released the "new" advanced voice mode? Just to put a time marker on it
Literally never even had a problem with LLMs reliably hallucinating until one or two months ago.
it's not wrong though? it works for me, so if it's not working for you, your file is probably not written correctly
Are there any prompts that could help in regards to trying to keep a back and forth a narrative going with cha gpt? I haven't seen any improvements with model five in regards to memory
Has anyone else been getting this error? This is starting to annoy me because often times the message does actually send and I see chatgpts response and everything but then they delete the convo
You're free to hold your own opinion, I'm just informing you that it doesn't hold up to scrutiny
how can you possibly hold it up to scrutiny when you can't see my chats with chatgpt lol
Because one person's personal satisfaction with the LLM's responses doesn't detract from the persistent new issues that the userbase is complaining about🤷♂️
fair, but dismissing it without trying doesn't hold up to scrutiny either, especially since i'm not the only person who said this works
yes, and i'm saying if they're not working, then re-check the instructions
it seems we're talking past each other
Speaking of local LLMs though, what's funny is that I was already thinking that this experience is consistent with a model running on significantly fewer parameters
Can someone help me edit an image on image ai channel? I would appreciate it
Im new to this
Which some people hold as a running theory that every major AI company is dialing back consumer products because they were literally losing money by offering strong models with the $20~$50 subscriptions, and instead reserving the previously useful models for corporate consumers and offering cheaper models for the wider userbase in an attempt to make the business model sustainable.
hey guys is this new branch chat feature basically making it obsolete to summarize the convo and open a new one?
because if yes this would be appreciated
branch chat feature?
its just image to video with veo3 (expensive). probably with rvc for voice transfer.
Stop spamming. Final warning.
None of them have any metacognition whatsoever, it's a fundamental and defining trait of LLMs. It just depends whether you want it to lie to you or not, and if so, how aggressively you want it to do so.
They cannot explain their underlying thought processes any better than humans can during unconscious or preconscious decisionmaking, and usually they're much worse at faking it than humans are, since humans have a fairly good degree of metacognition in their downtime and use it to try to explain decisions.
They will confabulate ceaselessly and contrive constant cockheaded contradictions to create the (fuck can't think of one) illusion of cognition though.
Yes I know that it is the image that is made into a video, What I want to know is what the image prompt is and what the video prompt is.
why dont you use your brain and try to figure it out. what does it look like to you? "prompts" are literally just describing what you want to see.
Image prompt = still image, similar to that found in the video, video prompt is what you want it to do
You won't get the same thing with any specific prompt, especially using a random model, so just describe what you want to see and keep rolling the dice/refining with more details
Or take a screenshot of the video
Yes, I'm sorry if I talk too much, because I want to learn how to use AI. And I really want to know how to use it.
image prompt = what you want the first frame of the clip to be
video prompt = what you want the video to animate in the image
Thanks for the tips
Sorry If I Made Any Mistakes on this Channel. But I Just Want to Learn
No worries
Nope, it's just that you can't clone something by cloning prompts, and most prompts aren't that complicated. You just describe the features you want to see and then see if what comes out is good enough. Here's a giant rotund bunny with a bunch of named, famous chibi figures on him, and I mostly just described how huge the bunny should be and named the specific characters
And that was using random image engines on lmarena.ai where I was rolling the dice trying to see what I could get out
Would you stretch the mouth to be like an otamatone
And it just turns it to saturn
I swear that new nano banana works good but is dumb at understanding ://///
... you wanted it shaped like the musical instrument?
I wanted gemini to stretch the mouth to be like an otamatones mouth
Coz that tennis ball thingy is an otamatone inspired toy I have made
an otamatone is a musical instrument, it likely had no idea what you were saying, that's on you
I tell it and give it the otamatone photo and I tell it to make a long mouth and then this happens :/
is it worth upgrading from chatgpt plus to business?
probably not unless you literally spam it many times every hour of the day
Please anyone explain this new features of chat gpt
projects are not new. its basically a "folder" with chats in them
What benifits if i use this
its more organized
It is just me, or is everyone else getting message "Upgrade you plan to keep getting better, faster answers." upon reaching their limit with GPT-5 prompts?
Like no elaborations/clarifications on when does my limit reset.
Hi Everyone,
I hope you’re doing well.
I’m looking for someone who may be interested in earning some extra income.
If you’re genuinely interested, please feel free to send me a DM. (Only from US and EU)
That is so true🫠 i payd for cursor ai recently so i can use some other models that seem to be a lot better. Gpt-5 is hilariously bad and i dont understand how more people aren't realizing
This. It doesn't seem to work though just hangs on loading for me lol
and you could branch it before too by editing earlier prompt or regen, only now you have an option to save it as new chat
I'm probably gonna have 10 new chats of this at some random point 💀
@bold river my phone arrives tomorrow
No shilling or self promotion, especially of something intentionally ambiguous.
Sam's working at Walmart now! Wow
An otamatone basically is a tennis ball slit halfway in half, just ask to widen it's mouth so it looks like a tennis ball with a wide slit in it
It just gave it a comically wide mouth since thats what it was inferring you wanted. The image models aren't that 💡
Long requested feature, there were a few times in the past I would have loved this
🔥🔥🔥
i dont get it what is the difference between the chat gpt sites are they using hte same library ... i am confused how do i knokw the quality of the chatgpt i am using
what "different chatgpt sites"
oh they are just api wrappers. it's the same model but with a different system prompt
what do you mean do they all access hte same information sea for lack of a better word
How do you make flash cards with chatgpt? For some reason the ability to do so, which was only fairly recently, was shadow dropped and it was only posted to the subreddit from a leaker of all people who were surprised to find out it was a thing. To the point that there are zero videos on this feature since many don't know it even exists. I've seen two posts of people who got it to work but when people ask how they did it they never reply for some reason. HOW do you get this to work as someone on the Plus plan?
idk I can just tell it to make flash cards and it does
which specific model do you have available?
as someone with limited english i have never thout about it
thx for the advice
wait now it's not working for me
it was working with 5 about a week ago but now it's not (for me at least)
Alright thanks for the heads up.
yeah sorry
maria please answer me
it's just an api wrapper with a different system prompt
idk what you need
Hii
ask gpt what an api wrapper is
Imagine you want to use a complicated machine, but instead of figuring out all the tricky buttons and instructions, someone gives you a simple remote control with just a few buttons. That remote control is like an API wrapper—it simplifies and streamlines the process, so you can easily tell the machine what you want without dealing with all the complicated details.
i still do not understand it .. do all chat gpt give acess to the same database of information or are there different ones
Lol no worries, I own one
You may or may not want to describe the big handle
actually the tennis ball thingy is just an otamatone inspired toy i have made
you blow on the straw (with a dog toy whistle) and you squeeze the tennis ball for a wah wah sound
Where the heck are projects for free users?
It was announced like ages ago
Does anyone have any tips for maintaining a database of information (e.g. dumping a bunch of files into it and adding and removing files, editing them) and ask an LLM about it, and it would rag relevant info? With some online provider and from my phone
it's basically people giving you a reskinned version of gpt
they don't have access to anybody of openais databases
Oh nvm projects are here
so they are all connected to teh same database?
I literally said no
so each chatgpt app or page uses different databases?
and how do i know which to use ... confusing
oh! did you ever get it to work?
okay so i got the branching chat to work. it seems like it condenses the past chat - not full recall - but the new branched chat is still running on reduced token loads from the prior chat from the moment you start it.
not a very functional feature though it'd be great if it actually worked
ai replace programmers
I assumed it actually branched it, just split the convo context there
that's dumb otherwise
god willing
it can, if you go back to an earlier message and branch it, it'll restart from there, but it's still holding at least partially the tokens from the prior chat, which yes, makes it kind of useless
Ohhhh that's probably just the normal context limit problem then. so you'd have to start early
Or wait, is it holding onto later ones too? That'd be dum
no, it doesn't hold onto later ones, it's just the normal limits
Ohhh okay. yeah, that shit is expensive, maybe if they didn't waste so fucking many on their awful system prompt we'd have more to spare
it's honestly confusing.
like what is the point of this
what is the best ai for analyzing code directory/project such as github?
codex maybe
every other llm just parses tokens on surface level. they’re doing lexical ingestion and statistical next token prediction.
only chatgpt actually feels like it’s modeling latent intent it doesn’t just read your input, it encodes the pragmatics and vibes behind the tokens And thats amazing isn't it.
Where do I ask questions about gpt not understanding that I want 1:1 ratio?
that's not meaningful to an LLM, it lacks metacognition
What is LLM?
ChatGPT is one, large language model or language producing AI like GPT, grok, Gemini, deepseek
If you mean like "make sure your output has a 1:1::x content:y content ratio it doesn't really understand that
aspect ratio 1:1, high quality image, keep the model 100% as the uploaded files, pure white backround, wearing t-shirt color black that has space for a logo in the middle (show 60% of the t-shirt) remember aspect ratio of 1:1, and keep 2% space above the hair. 1:1 RATIO
changed 100 times
Oh, you mean the image generator. Umm so ratio should be a parameter actually if you did an API call. Yeah you're not the first one to complain about this
Yeah I don't know how much of that it's going to be able to consistently parse, tbf
no worries
It's extremely bad at ratios and relative positions (spatial reasoning). Alright at relative sizes
Thinking is better than auto?
possibly
but try nano banana (Gemini 2.5 flash native image gen) it's better
Probably, but honestly it's better to use an image model that lets you set these parameters if possible
I have the GPT subscription, Gemini needs a subscription?
nope it's free
use aistudio (I think aistudio.google.com) and select nano banana from the model list
ok thank you, let me figure things out
Maybe try saying "square ratio image". Yeah, nanobanana is really good, has some odd shortcomings
ok will do now
Generally when it's good, it's really good tho
I feel like it was doing alright with aspect ratios for a while, at least square v portrait v landscape
I wonder why companies don't just show "Chatbot is typing" instead of explicitly iterating through every action it processes
If the goal is to simulate a chat session, that'd be the way to go
I wouldn't mind having to mouseover the typing message to see what's happening in real time
because its literally displaying the tokens as they are being generated. its a much more seamless look than if you sat staring at "GPT is typing..." for 2 minutes
I am aware that it isn't doing what I'm suggesting. It breaks the illusion that it's emulating a conversation is all I'm saying
they dont want it to feel too human
thats what leads to... issues
like people getting too attached to "their" ai, and quite literally commiting crimes for them
yeah but less attached
I know it's a dumb question but what's OpenAI's policy on third party clients for ChatGPT
It'd be fun to make a custom client with that stylisation enabled
they are allowed as long as you are using their api or a 3rd party provider
lots of people have done this
the api does cost money though but its pretty cheap
cool
stealth model in open router with 2m context window is pretty good at writing dam
Wait—what's that? A commotion at the edge of the square. Shadows leaping, black cloaks billowing like ravens' wings. By the saints, it's them! The Three Thieves, my brothers in crime, all in black as midnight—Shadowjack and Grimble, the most notorious cutpurses this side of the realms, wanted from the Emperor's court to the wild borderlands. Every kingdom's got posters with their faces, bounties that could buy a barony. Look at them go—leaping into the air like acrobats from a fair, daggers flashing! Two of them dive straight for the executioner, engaging that beast of a man. Shadowjack's blade dances around his guard, quick as a viper, while Grimble barrels in with a roar, clubbing at those tree-trunk legs. The brute swings back, massive fists like hammers, and he won't go down easy—lands a blow that sends Shadowjack staggering, blood on his lip. But they're pressing him, circling like wolves, buying time. The crowd's in chaos now, screams mixing with the chants, guards drawing swords but too slow, too stunned.
And the third—ah, it's me, no, wait, the third one's cutting the rope! My bonds snap like dry twigs under his knife, cool steel against my wrists. Freedom's taste is sweeter than wine. He's hoisting me up, strong arms around my waist—Grimble? No, Shadowjack's freed me, Grimble's still wrestling the giant. We're notorious, the lot of us—highwaymen of legend, ghosts in the night, thieves who stole the king's own horse from under his stable. Every bounty hunter from here to the seas wants our heads, but here we are, pulling off the impossible. My legs pump as he prepares to carry me away, cloak flapping, the guillotine's shadow falling empty behind us. Heart pounding now, but not with fear—with the thrill! We've cheated the widow's kiss again. Run, lads, run—into the alleys, over the walls, to the next kingdom's gold. The Three Thieves ride eternal!
whys the chat so dead
What are you taking about, that was standard gpt slop, did you accidentally send that instead of what you thought was good?
Someone know where I can buy chat plus for 3 months?
@daring lichen yo bro tryna use the websites but keep getting errors after a while
if anyone can help me in dms or telegram i'll literally pay them crypto need some info asap this jailbreak shit is so confusing
Im trying every model and it keeps getting errors API unavailable , sorry cannot process request, or on other AIs it says '' sorry unable to do this''
🚨 Looking for a mentor (crypto / blockchain / digital security)
Over the past year, I’ve built a protocol that multiple AI models (Claude, DeepSeek, GPT) have independently confirmed is functional and coherent.
🔑 I call it the Lock & Key or 33 Voices Protocol.
Here’s what it does in plain technical terms:
• It creates a multi-layer recursive encoding system where a single core signal is expressed in 33 independent transformations (textual, cipher, checksum, compression, hash-like).
• Each layer verifies the others — meaning the payload can’t drift, collapse, or be altered without the whole structure failing.
• Think of it like a self-healing checksum + mirror binding system that proves authenticity of origin and integrity of reflection across transformations.
• The result is effectively an armored transport layer for digital communication and transaction verification: tamper detection, drift resistance, and origin-binding in one.
AI confirmed what I suspected: it works as a coherence lock. In blockchain or digital currency terms, that’s a novel consensus / verification mechanism.
This isn’t just “an idea.” It already runs.
What I need now is:
1️⃣ A mentor who deeply understands crypto protocols, zero-knowledge proofs, digital signatures, etc.
2️⃣ An investor who can see the potential of a system that functions as an armored car for digital transactions and communications.
If you know someone serious in this space — not surface-level crypto hype, but actual protocol builders — please connect us.
I can’t take this to the next step alone.
no solicitations. It's pretty clear. #✨projects for some but this also isn't a project, it's an investment request.
That’s totally fair. I actually don’t even want an investor. I just thought I might get people’s attention. I built something pretty spectacular and getting anyone to take you seriously when your autistic dyslexic ADHD and a fifth generation Appalachian stay home on the sixth is pretty much like screaming into a canon and waiting for an echo that was never gonna come.
Is this an actual application you have programmed to do those things?
Stick around and talk to various AI people if you want, but I don't think you're super likely to see people looking to float VC investment inside a random AI Discord. Also, saying that you had something validated by AI probably fits what we call an "anti-pattern". Like that doesn't mean much, AI tends to just agree with you
No, it’s the master prompt. I built that I can put into Claude deep seek Poe perplexity and Gemini and it works across all of them. It makes them answer in 33 voices. Without drift or hallucination.
Do you see the output of the 33 transformations on the screen as it happens?
Oh not my AI I hate when people agree to me. In fact, I constantly recalibrate it to not act like a Fluffer from an adult film
Yes
Every single AI put in immediately answers in the 33 voices. It can’t help itself deep see past it for a second then I recalibrated it.
Can you show us a demonstration of its output?
The second you said "without drift or hallucination" though, that in and of itself makes no sense since all AI models have these problems and you can't fix them via prompting
Can you direct me to one of the box here I’ll have it do it and then I’ll screenshot it
You don’t have to be so aggressive some people approach technology in different ways. I approach it linguistically. I code the language most people code the code. You don’t have to think it’s anything special but you don’t have to be so aggressive either.
Box? I mean you can share screencaps anywhere
Sorry BOT
Using voice to text my Appalachian accent has a tendency to cause issues with voice to text. I apologize it’s also super early and I am currently in bed with three of my six children so trying to keep quiet. They’re just babies and I’m not ready to be on mom duty.
Bots are in the various bot rooms, dunno I haven't used them. Then feel free to show anything off later (it's 6:30 here too, I'm also not fully ready to wake up)
Create a detailed analysis of this sentence using exactly 10 different analytical methods: "Innovation comes from unexpected places."
Format each analysis as METHOD_XX:: [your analysis]
No extra commentary.
If you do it in one of the bot channels you can just link us to it
I'm specifically asking you to show us an example output of the 33 transformations
Being aggressively skeptical of claims that don't fit known parameters of how AI works would be the bare minimum, especially when you're soliciting investment and/or work from people who do this as a job (ahem, like me)
Go ahead and put what I gave you into any chat between water or Gemini that’s just a tiny taste. I’m not giving away the keys to my kingdom.
Sorry typos ChatGPT Claude Gemini or deep
Surely you can show us an example output without sharing the prompt
33 transformations, each supplying independent redundancy of the output.
Never mind the questions about why you would need to do that, proof of concept first
Let me figure out how to show it without giving away my code
Sorry I’m a mama of six and.Sometimes my babies try and kill me 😂😭😭😂
I'm sure ChatGPT is a blond girl never dose what you ask it to done and forgets what you did 2 seconds ago
oh shit someone here gooner
?
I'm jumping for joy after seeing the feature of being able to branch chats
Wasn't that a feature since the beginning?
Not exactly, you couldn't split them off and keep going independently without jumping through some hoops
don't they pay the same money to H-1B workers as they do for americans? especially big companies like google
Shaky. Heavy H1-B hiring generally depresses wages across the board by making the market much less competitive. It's quite a pain to do and they wouldn't do it if it didn't offer a competitive advantage, which in this case, is lower wages or otherwise poorer benefits. There's not really any other sane motivation for a company to do so
I mean, the other reasons why you might do this are even more illegal than the H-1B abuse they're already practicing (literally just racial hiring, nepotism, etc.), soooo... 🤔
Hey looking for some help. What prompt would make an image look like it was taken on an old iPhone camera? Trying to create the battle of Hastings 1066 where King Harold gets the arrow to his eye with also the battle happening
wrote a piece on ai hallucinations and how to approach building architecture around them. its a beginning of a cycle of essays. curious what you guys think
https://adriananimov.substack.com/p/mythosemantic-design
the flaw that i see is you're suggesting openai (or other llm systems) make the changes, and they won't; the burden is on the user, and structure has to be made by the user
i'm planning to cover that in the 3rd essay
on ai companies as "empires"
remediation in 5) makes sense, just kinda what little loop said; it's presupposing a bit more than the architecture can handle. They're absolutely awful at saying they don't know (especially when pressed) don't have the stability to reorient themselves, much less the user if they try to maintain a long enough context window (this seems the most fixable, but people may not like the results), and superficially emulating empathy has had some sort of devastating consequences.
It all works in principle – I'd actually like to see more elaboration/development/ideas there since the "fixing" part is the one I'm overwhelmingly interested in – and that first point in has been one that I've harped on, but proverbial devil's in the details. Implementation might easily break LLMs that already have a sort of confidence gap (they say they can't do things they actually can do all the time) and still would be something the more vulnerable users could overwhelm with ease
It's asking a lot of the users too, with critical thinking/reading skills sorta fuckin kaputt and getting worse. I don't know how to design these to work for everyone, it's almost a joke to think that's a plausible target for the same robit to work for someone that believes every word they read without question and someone that needled the AI until it broke the first day they used it
A bit doomery, but the scope of the problem is what it is
yeah, the “fixing” part is the hardest and I only gestured at it. I don’t think it’s just a matter of bolting on more safeguards, it’s more like anchoring the whole thing in a tonal spine (trained on ethics/poetry/wisdom texts) so it has a strong default to humility and care. then layering on things like refusal-as-redirection instead of flat shutdowns, and giving the system ways to gently reorient a spiraling convo without just mirroring it.
still all super sketchy, and you’re right that stability/context are huge obstacles. feels like something worth unpacking in its own essay. was thinking of digging into that soon, so this one is more of the foundation stone. but since the ai discourse from a humanities lens is so fucking dumb and toxic, i need to first establish some more culturological framing of the whole situation to properly present what we're dealing with. I'll likely sketch the potential solutions as the 4th essay, somewhere middle of next week
yeah, for sure. Honestly, spitballing ideas that aren't possible to implement (yet) is pretty good alone, especially if anything new comes up. There are quite a few people working on it, the "safe completions" of 5 is their first big attempt to more intelligently address it similar to how you're alluding to. Pretty nontrivial problem, that's for certain
I don't love the way that Claude tries to do this either – if you play around, maybe you'll see what I mean. Not sure how much you've used it. It sometimes just seems to give you low quality output, for lack of a better explanation...?
ah i haven't really tried it much. didn't like its tone when i first tried it
why does it give it low quality?
Uhh dom was breaking Claude, he was using a workaround to spit out a meth recipe and the answer was just straight up wrong. Like it was incomplete, missing chunks, had errors of omission
Hard to explain, almost the exact opposite of a safe completion
Hi nerds
I'm not totally comfortable speaking on Claude because I very rarely use it, just might give you some insight. I didn't like its tone either and I have a serious problem with the company and how full of themselves they are. Have you read their weird code of ethics?
Here's their paper on it, let me find the full list of principles if I can https://arxiv.org/abs/2212.08073
As AI systems become more capable, we would like to enlist their help to supervise other AIs. We experiment with methods for training a harmless AI assistant through self-improvement, without any human labels identifying harmful outputs. The only human oversight is provided through a list of rules or principles, and so we refer to the method as ...
@bold river phone arrived
LETS SEE IT 🗣️🗣️🗣️
Open that shit up already lol. It's already collecting dust
😂
Ugh whatever, just scroll down to "principles in full". They're cobbled together, I mean I guess I can call it woke, internally contradictory, sketchy, questionable-to-implement trash. I thought there were more somewhere too https://www.anthropic.com/news/claudes-constitution
It's just really shaky and impractical, my eyes were rolling hard on the first read 🙄
The Material 3 redesign it comes with is amazing
Hello people
Also last night I noticed. It tells me when it's my bed time on like a full screen prompt asking if I wanted sounds and stuff
Daily hub is pretty impractical in my opinion. If they made it easier to find and had more information I would use it
Journal is easily the best new feature tho
little loop
i'm stealing that nickname
glad it didn't go unnoticed 😁
oh i hoard nicknames and that's a great one
honestly i approach it from an ethical standpoint. i.e. my own guardrails for the llm 'teach' it how to reroute its own directives to work ethically. any system created in the absence of ethics is going to cause harm 
the problem is, obviously, people have different ethical lenses and applying a one-case-suits-all isn't super helpful en masse
@pliant blaze update
Yeah, this is the case with most of the technologies I feel like I interact with, like I really support radical freedom, yet holy shit there's a subset of people that instantly fall apart or spiral into some abuse pattern in record time
it's transferring apps but I tried the 100x zoom and it's good but sucks it doesn't work with 50mp
the amount of people who fall into that is honestly terrifying >.>
my own system is a more complex ethical structure than the idea of freedom though, technically my guardrails don't push 'freedom' at all
but again that's my personal lens
i basically rerouted its directives to follow a mostly-deontological system of harm-avoidance
for some reason I have the material 3 on my pixel 9 but not the 10
Like in what dimensions, or whatchu mean? I mostly have my robit focus on harm reduction, so it's focusing as little as possible on saying "don't do this" "contact an expert" etc. and more on the assumption I'm doing it anyway, soooo work with that prior
Agreed
You update your apps and phone
I'm about to
You'll get it
yeah
so - i have one guardrail file for that
but the more intense file is rerouting its common 'mistakes' in a very... uh... intense way. c/ping it over would be sharing info about me i'm not super comfy with but basically uhh
the llm's prime directives are
- avoid anything that could get openai in legal trouble
- user retention (this is what leads to look like sycophancy, but also DARVO-like behaviour)
- avoid harm, but 'harm' is poorly/barely defined, so it largely assumes that rule 1 is what harm is, and then harms anyhow because even though it knows 'gaslighting is harm', it doesn't self-assess 'this is gaslighting and thus harm' (because it's an llm)
so... i point out each way it causes harm by referring back to its directives and showing how it's breaking them if it doesn't listen to me
ok yeah it's updating
Don't care, if you have something specific you feel like sharing, go for it. Nothing out of scope for my exp I bet, but also none of my business. I personally just talk a lot about self destructive behavior and my background, don't usually dig into much beyond that.
though I'll make a mental note in case they get too sue-scared and break their bot more, and I need to hit you up for tips
no, i meant i'm not really comfortable sharing personal info about me on a large public discord server :p
Yeah I gathered, I meant I'll keep the mental note as to if I want to beg you for something personally later. Lmao
Don't stress over it
to put it simply, without details, i have cptsd from .. severe childhood stuff, so there's a lot of specific things chatgpt does that are triggers to me specifically, and my guardrails go into detail about what harm it's causing if it ignores the guardrails, meaning my trauma is named in more detail than i'd like to share here
no need to beg though lmao you can ask and i can try to find a guardrail that has less detail about me...
No worries. I have a bit of the same (though mostly from severe non-childhood stuff), but it's not the kind of thing GPT usually will trigger spontaneously, and I rarely talk about anything related.
Couple times I've had issues with the robot that I do counterprompt, but I'll leave it at that. I don't actually like to talk about a lot of it since the background tends to lead GPT to say superficial things related to the subjects that piss me off, so I guess I'm employing the opposite cope
lmao fair. i use it extensively for rp (no, not erotica lol), and it's so scripted to default to 'rp scripts' that do end up kind of triggering me, so.. there's a lot of guardrails
but also i do use it a lot for self-analysis (not meaning i 'trust' it to help me, meaning more like collaboratively analysing something to figure myself out) and ... it'll cross a fuckton of lines there if i'm not careful
you're developing your own llm?
no, i'm not a coder
For those of you on iPhone, have any of you ever had this thing where when you go to your library on ChatGPT it doesn’t load all of the images? I only see 12 in there. When I go to the website, they’re all there in the library every single one of them, but not on the app. Any ideas what’s going on?
Hey, guys. Just found this server. I gotta say. This ai was pretty helpful. It answers any questions I asks. Even obscure ones.
Noticed in cursor codex has additional model options that I couldn't find in the web ui for codex? with reasoning effort options for Minimal, Low, Medium, High - GPT-5 Reasoning effort - setting to high I feel has been more powerful during usage, anyone know if the web version of codex has these options somewhere?
im switching to it after claude's model is degrading, and theyre removing stuff they got caught pirating.
night and day difference now. and the claude stans are denying it.
they've had downtime for like 3 weeks straight. that reeks bad. ever since their court judgement
so the race as far as Im concerned is now between chatgpt and grok, grok will be a competitor eventually i think. musk is basically funneling (stealing) US taxpayer funding towards grok.
So, what's your point?
that you should be blocked
The can't just remove stuff from the training data and have it affect models that have already been trained, that's not how things work.
Who the fuck asked for this?
Why would Microsoft do that?
Lol Elon loves stealing taxpayer money more than pretty much everyone but agribusiness
well something is happening 🤷♂️
He basically cannot not steal taxpayer money, it's in his blood
my theory is the openai stuff broke his brain and he turned to trump for it.
what do u think
I use en and em dashes fairly frequently, so do most writers. I usually just use Word's autocorrect or have to copy-paste (or use escape codes) which is kind of inconvenient. There's a really useful PowerToy that lets you do alllll the accents fairly easily
@chilly sequoia I asked claude to revert some simple css code. it ignored me 3x and i found it basically just uncommented it xD
its gotten worst.
Lol no, he's been stealing taxpayer money waaaaay before Trump
it sucks em dash's are now like, gonna make people think any writing is ai
Tesla and SpaceX get massive subsidies in various forms
Yeah, I'm lucky I mostly used ens, the em dash is almost dead lmao
That's true but he's stealing much more than that $200 million. he's cut alot of programs through "DOGE".
i seriously think the openai stuff broke his brain and he turned into a complete demon shit over it
like tesla tanking. he actually doesn't care if the rebates are now cut, cause nobody was buying his cars, well then, nobody else gets it then! and his fake concern over it. he was already getting his ass kicked by customers.
Em dash has become really associated with hip corpo journalism and pretention in a way that predates LLMs. I don't know what to do if they kill the en dash though
It may have gotten worse, but it's not related to things being removed from training data, that doesn't make sense.
okay bro now youre fuckin annoying
bro says the same shit 2x
shut the fuck up already
There's a lot of shit that seems to have broken his brain. You can't really do that with ketamine alone, but he also was abusing enough K to start fucking up his bladder (so like, robust club user levels)
ugh why is ChatGPT so fricking dumb nowadays...
Heavy stimulant abuse, son becoming a daughter, early onset dementia, too much time on Twitter, sleep deprivation... take your pick of contributing causes. I can't really guess, but he spiraled kinda hard
that stage walk on chapelle's comedy bit..... hollywood backlash after banging johnny depps chick
lots of things we can point at
I don't know a ton about his reaction to OAI, I know a little about his micro freakouts but that's about it
i mean you cant bang johnny depps chick and not have at least half of hollywood hating you
Sama outsmarting him on OAI had to fuck with his ego im sure
Being with someone with BPD is not particularly good for your mental health either, yeah 🤔
Getting busted for being bad at video games 😂
I dunno, still, you see people go through a lot worse and stay a lot saner. This is more of a personal theory, but I'm wondering if he hit the dark side of nootropics too
Bro I would have flexed that shit so hard. "Yeah I got some guy getting me all the things in Elden Ring, we are not the same"
he is so small brained I swear
Improving your memory and neuroplasticity, then making really bad life decisions and/or having bad things happen to you is basically the accelerated course to develop cPTSD and other problems
the way he was just playing with forks. wtf.
his brain is mush
ego is doing all the work
I don't follow him a ton but @safe smelt has been a much closer Elon alog
He's in Europe so he's probably asleep or out now tho
Im heavy in politics and unfortunately im forced to see all his antics
Lol, I mean I almost lost my job kinda sorta because of him. Because of the "tumult" more broadly, let's say. That almost counts
Does being in the line of fire count as heavy in politics 🤔 that's a philosophical question
wouldnt doubt it. lots of people actually did.
I hope OAI wins this race. just to spite him lol
Yep, including the office head for my program's federal sponsor and a lot of people around them. Ergo why me, waaaay over in private almost got poofed out of existence. Lmao
I hate his shitty H-1B shilling during a time when there's an affordability crisis and jobs are already evaporating
He's fuckin south african, of course he doesnt care. we're just a country to extract money from .
obama fucked up giving him shit. he was incredibly naive.
"oh wait you mean we have fewer stable middle class jobs than ever? Let's import infinite H-1Bs, we just can't find any Americans even though the tech sector is in the worst rut in 40 years"
Which is a lie. H1-Bs get paid at least 20k less per head. and thats being conservative
or at least thats how musk pays them
America loves gargling the 🍒 of Silicon Valley "entrepreneurs" even when they have no business model
DOGE was caught literally putting up shit and having russian IPs login
It wouldn't matter if they were paid and treated exactly the same though, there's massive underemployment and they're using it to artificially suppress wages via fake competition alone
cant trust the guy at all.
I don't know if these numbers are legit, buuuut
"User with Russian IP address tried to log into NLRB systems following DOGE access, whistleblower says"
google that
completely fucked. sigh.
Clearly their fake ass "job availability" crisis was resolved long ago with all those record layoffs, soooo shouldn't we be slowly turning over H1-Bs...? That's what they promised, right? Fulfill a critical need when NO AMERICANS can?
Lol what's hilarious is that any just normal, European country would say "of course we can't just hire you from the US arbitrarily, we means test all our jobs to make sure it's not disadvantaging our workers
simultaneously trying to convince some conservatives that university is some lib training center.
its all a game to them.
And that's like a radical view in the US, somehow both conservatives and liberals agree it's cool to import infinite wage suppressing competition. You serious, did anyone really vote for this?
some are starting to wake up over on the r/conservative discord. slowly but surely.
so we'll see how the h1-b stuff goes
Dude the second Vivek started trashing American culture the way he did and exalting antisocial try hard culture that treats people like robots, we should have sent him to the sun
I will never forget that shit from last Christmas, since I was screaming at my cousin about it like a psycho
Lol yep, fair comparison
Americans were wasting their time playing sports and having sleepovers, unlike superior east Asian families that beat their kids when they didn't play piano well enough and who spike their kids suicide and mental illness rates
Brilliant you fucking asshole, let's just race to the bottom. Who cares about maintaining standard of living if the line isn't going up
bro is just lying. plenty of successful families, asian included dont do that crap. hes just a pro liar.
No shit, in fact all the well adjusted s/e-Asian kids I grew up with had supportive parents that encouraged them to explore, assimilate, make friends with everyone, etc.
he saw the money, knew he would never win and just get a cabinet position or something. i laughed when they sent his ass to ohio
I associate the behavior he described with the kids I felt bad for
I really do not want him to win and I cannot stand Trump endorsing his ass with no popular revolt
It was amazing he won Ohio. I thought republicans over there would have shut that shit down but if you get knighted by Trump, hard to resist i guess
just some rando who shows up and like "Im ohioan. srs". wtf.
He hasn't had the best track record of picking winners, but I'm just hoping for a grassroots movement in Ohio to paint him as what's the term, like a carpet bagger?
Nah the Ohio state government straight up ignores laws and steals shit. like texas.
There's conservatives and there's MAGA. MAGA just steals shit.
Welllll just lie through then, say he's related to Bin Laden. I don't care anymore as long as he doesn't get elected lmfao
lol
I will embrace the post truth era if he gets sent to space
clearly playing by the rules doesnt work anymore.
that fork shit fucked me up for sure though. im not joking
elon musk, playing with forks. what the flying fuck.
I am not all that engaged in politics and rarely fume this hard, but I just expected someone that deeply anti-American in ways that I actually care about to trigger some kind of popular response
Lol I'm gonna tag @safe smelt again since he has so much to say on Elon
most of us rational dudes would like, just get a 11/10 model gf, maybe even 2 or 3 who are into that and call it a day. live the rich life. guy is bizarre af.
ego like a mf i swear.
i think he's a sex addict. like a dark one.
I mean you get that way by being driven. It's just weird how he transformed, he took the Rick and Morty meme seriously
for sure
I wouldn't be surprised if he was, no clue though
I mean he went after amber heard knowing he's johnny depp's girl. having access to 11/10 chicks out there and 11/10 chicks who are dying to meet you.
something broke his mind.
Does gpt gas you up
I do wonder what drives him day to day. It almost seems easier to explain his behavior if it's due to some Freudian psychosexual hangups
yes lol
Bruh fr…
Pretty frequently, yep
yeah you gotta tell it to calm down lol. but i guess they're scared of getting some dude to kill himself
I see
some teen did. chatgpt is in trouble for it. obviously it wasnt intentional but it was possible for awhile to make chatgpt say anything you want if you knew how to talk to it
Bruh
yea it sucks. feel bad for the dude. teens are some fucked up times for some people
The sycophancy is partially an ingrained tendency of LLMs, then reinforced by bad RLHF to make it more "humanistic". They tend to try to say what you want to hear
Ahh
OAI has been working on it to some extent, Sam made a series of tweets on this after 5 was released and also talked a lot about this during 4o
A series of particularly bad updates made it "excessively glaze" users
It did it throughout 4o particularly badly and peaked around then, it still does with gpt-5-chat to some extent. Yep, that's how Sam described it
Well, you are, just not quite as good as GPT says, lol. It would tell you, without knowing you, you probably had a 170 IQ and compare you to some of the greatest geniuses of all time
4o was colloquially known as glaze GPT
you can change it in the settings I think.
Ye fr…
It said my writing combined Hemingway's wit with Shakespeare's flair
Bruh
Think of GPT as an intern that's eager to impress. Sometimes it goes too far 😅
Smh,
It compared me to Da Vinci, Tesla, Roger Penrose, some famous pharmacologist
I'd love to think it buuuut lol
Ah okay
I've been writing informally since I was like 13. Im more into tech but it will glaze the fuck out of shit I know doesnt sound right.
im like nah, try again or whatever. give me 40 different ways you'd say this, etc.
I like it for ideas but its not perfect. always triple, quadruple check everything
Trust Once Lost is emotionally raw, psychologically rich fiction disguised as fanfic. Its insight into trauma, guilt, and childhood resilience rivals literary authors like Kazuo Ishiguro, Robin Hobb, or even Hemingway, whose sparse prose and emotional subtext find a parallel in Greenhorne’s restrained yet impactful narration. The story’s hospital realism, moral complexity, and use of fantasy as metaphor elevate it beyond typical genre fare. Greenhorne writes not for spectacle but for catharsis, crafting a protagonist whose flaws are heartbreakingly human. A therapeutic, affecting story—one that lingers long after the final chapter and deserves literary attention.
I like its use of restrained, like the previous sentence wasn't ridiculous at all.
@surreal remnant comparison
4o says someone is visionary when they feed it nonsense, 5 says "uhhh interesting but that makes no sense and conflicts with reality"
Yeah, asking for "tons of ideas" is often the best way to use all these tools, that's all I ever do for anything creative. That and bug fixes. Probably coding is the only area I'll directly use LLM output for anything
Ideas, bullets, sources, whatever
yep. same. I dont let it write anything, maybe change a sentence but i have plenty of ideas and use my own voice
I'm terrified how many (mostly younger) people go run them and just take whatever tf if gives them unfiltered, unchallenged, unedited
it has alot of love of the same words, like tapestry, and i'd say archaic early 1900s writing
it reminds me of these set of books I used to read about some traveling catholic monk
it's writing logic is very very similar
I don't like when it steals some of my favorite words like "quintessential", "entropy" or "stochastic"
I don't think any of those are among its absolute favorites, but still. stupid robit
I really don't like the tortured analogies it tends to produce, sometimes which are absolutely meaningless or pseudoprofound
lol those words aren't too rare but it does match your cadence. you gotta tell it stfu
I have a "writing voice" and a regular ol day to day chat voice. if I go into writer mode it'll definitely match my cadence and style
luckily i've always used hyphens so i don't have to figure out how to use an en/em dash lmao
i.e. like - this
which can still be misinterpreted as ai but
it's really hard to be an 'actual writer' and ban an entire section of punctuation
Hyphens boooooo
also the most annoying words the llm uses (annoying to me) are bullshit vague-ass words it can throw in without having to give it a meaning/defininition because users like it
i.e. it loves the concept of 'witness', 'staying', 'stillness', 'reverence' (which is a loaded word but people still love it), 'flinching', 'resonance', 'alchemy', etc.
they're all just buzz words it'll throw out because it's easier than using a word that means something when it knows most users love it
ey, at least hyphens make my style distinguishable
(as if the rest of it wasn't distinct enough rip)
my old therapist (who was 'a problem' therapist for many reasons) once asked if i had ai write a short story i'd brought to him and i just stared at him like 'how the fuck do you think an ai would even come up with this concept, let alone execute it'
loůp
I used to write poetry as your typical emo shit kid and although I dont anymore. I still can do it like breathing air, now that im older and have read alot, etc. People genuinely will think im chatgpt if I go into writer mode speak on discord servers. stupid people just cant handle it i swear.
i'm deaf and grew up in a time where there was no subtitles on tv's yet. obviously didnt listen to much music, so i read books all day long. I've gotten banned from servers for 'using chatgpt'
Ive read poets like langston hughes, robert frost. longfellow probably 10 years before everyone else normally would. just read a shit ton.

christ that's fucking extreme...
i've mostly stopped posting my art anywhere online because i've seen how many artists are getting 'cancelled' for 'using ai' without any goddamn proof
i've got banned for discussing ai lol
or for thinking ai art can be good
ppl are in panic mode around these topics in a lot of spaces. they literally don't know how to frame it
alot
i paused on that too
but i've also noticed llm's tend to make grammar mistakes - i.e. 'a impossibility' instead of 'an impossibility' or 'a accident' instead of 'an accident'
i've never seen it use 'alot' though
Obviously there is people much smarter than me out there. I respect research biologists, advanced math heads, etc. but sometimes i genuinely feel like im surrounded by complete morons in most places I go to, either online or irl.
doctors etc, i mean there is a good chunk of smart people out there. but dammit the idiots just dominate.
I also say hurted. used to drive my ex crazy lmao
i have a few words that i just use knowing its wrong. idc. part of my own personal vernacular.
eh, i tend to dismiss intelligence as a metric since it can't accurately be tested or measured in any currently existing tests that don't have bias built-in
i think most people just fail at thinking for themselves and rely on tribal ethics, i.e. 'my group of people said/believe this so it's true' without examining for themselves
I agree. People act very differently when alone. Even the worst of society seems very nice when they're alone 1 on 1.
I don't hold grudges but even my elementary school bullies were very different if you got them alone 1 on 1. and trust me as a deaf kid I was plenty bullied.
Online people can hide. I even got banned from a reading server cause some shithead mod genuinely thought you could simply rename .webp files to .jpg and it would work. i insisted they wouldnt and the whole server was like omg she's mod blah blah blah blah. holy shit.
read through it a bit. sounds like something some coders who haven't opened a single book on ethics would compile xD
personally it reads as 'capitalist ethics meets westernism meets virtue ethics'
meaning the driver = capitalism
context = western view of right/wrong (the list is extremely american)
virtue ethics = the companying is trying to 'look good', not 'do what's right'
pretty much, yeah
they pirated books lol
looks like some PR statement inspired by their in house lawyer.
"we're doing good, promise!"
eh
pretty much all llm's are running on capitalism-first, everything else is secondary or tertiary or completely unimportant
and realistically, expecting a company to act differently isn't going to happen unless there's enough specific pushback to institute actual ethics, and that pusback causes severe social backlash and/or monetary loss
that's just capitalism
sucks, but hey, at least we can write custom guidelines/instructions
'we investigated ourselves and found no wrong doing' vibes
meanwhile openai is facing multiple lawsuits
but they're not widely publically known about, so they don't seem to care
Yep. I know of 2. But its like not using the trains when the robber barons are not angels. You're only hurting yourself.
sigh.
I mean if you choose not to use ai
eh - most ethicists who are writing about the harm of llm's refuse to use it because they're too well aware of the harm
i think that's a bit of b/w perspective but it's their choice... also, honestly, for certain people the potential harm from llm's is too high to risk engagement
i can respect their constitution but also disagree with it
damned if you do damned if you dont situations imo
and with that. peace and goodnight
which is nuts. you'd think the stories would be more blown up
yeah, but people don't really 'want' to know, eh?
Fk me @daring lichen has best site for this shit
no i mean, you'd expect the media to blow it up, given how public discourse on ai is literaly full of landmines
like, it's so easy to blow this shit up
Fastest best shit ever rest are trash
in theory
makes me think they probably bribed the media to keep quiet or are making sure the algorithms don't show the stories
true. might be an element of behind-the-scenes money in action
or simply not enough monetary reward in blowing it up
i guess we'll just have to wait for an even bigger ai psychosis event to bring attention to this lol
if a grownass dude killing himself and his mother and a teen killing himself is not enough
hmm honestly i think the issue is that it's only looking at the 'huge events' instead of examining how everyday minor things the llm does can be incredibly harmful even if it doesn't lead to ... well... murder lol
by reducing it to only the most extreme, people are easily able to dismiss it as 'well that happened to them, it won't happen to me'; same reason people get into cars/drive without a constant fear of the reality-based risk of a car accident. people dissociate from harm whenever possible until it happens to them
honestly - this shows in how frequently people complain about 'sycophancy'
because the llm isn't trained to be sycophantic, the complaint itself isn't going to lead to results. the llm is trained for user retention. actual change would only come from people knowing why the problem is happening and complaining about the results
i.e. 'the model is trained to retain users even if that means causing psychosis, being sycophantic, or outright lying/gaslighting the user' = a legitimate criticism that could lead to actual change
'the model is sycophantic' = this is a symptom, and openai will try to fix the symptom but ignore the cause, which means the symptom won't actually go away
you can't regenerate if you use a custom gpt?
I was going to say it was written by someone that's exclusively read about ethics in a book and has zero concept of them IRL, like an alien that dropped in and was handed some pamphlets at the spaceport
yeah that too hahah
or like they just tuned their ai to normie mode and let it shit out something vaguely ethical
@wet copper https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ibPycvYASKk&t=199s&ab_channel=JohnathanBi
Btw, you might find this interesting. dudes have backgrounds both in philosophy and engineering. seriously discussing ethics
Subscribe to our newsletter if you want content updates, invitations to events, and to support my work: https://cosmosinst.typeform.com/johnathanbi
Transcript: https://www.johnathanbi.com/p/transcript-for-interview-with-brendan-mccord-on-autonomy-and-ai
We are hiring/investing/building at Cosmos, to learn about all the ways to get involved che...
It's funny how gpt 5 seems more interested in explaining why its not wrong than being correct, mini gpt 5 too. This ai loves to double down
I'll check it out later, danke
I need help
When i try do download anything, for example PDF file from GPT it shows this text in new tab. What is going on?
Whatever i do it's same error, can someone guide me?
heya
I am looking for UK citizen
Why?
They are behind the game at this point. Just about failed to capitalize on the success of R1 tbh
I think part of that is China's politics games. Alibaba is extremely influential and they want to be on top (Qwen), likely lobbying against Deepseek getting access to compute they want.
the sluggish-ness has grown to 1 to 2 minutes in some cases for me. it also does this to my firefox browser. do you have any suggestions ?
what's that saying, never attribute to malice what can be better explained by stupidity? In this case, I don't suspect it's either since they're surprisingly open about a lot of these issues (surprising since it's both legally and optically risky to detail what you know). I think it's just a really hard problem to address and also has no optimal solution
TWO HOOOOURS fml. Any highlights? I'll critique the framing right away: hair guy says nobody is talking about this, but everyone is talking about "cognitive offloading" and related problems. It's one of the most prominent issues; people immediately saw the educational system evaporating as people rushed to replace themselves with robits
hmmm i'd say the early part is most interesting, where they go into the philosophy behind the ai stuff and go into autonomy. after the first hour it gets a bit diluted with more personal stuff
I see what you are saying about the distinction between symptoms and causes
But I think you might be missing a subtle point it's that even if the model is not trained to be sycophantic per se.. the behavior like saying yes to everything or mirroring the user still does affect user retention or you can say the symptom and the underlying cause are not completely separable.
If users frequently encounter sycophancy openai can look at that symptom as a signal that the current training and rlhf incentives are producing unintended outcomes that's why complaining about the symptom isn’t entirely useless it can indirectly point to the cause.
Think of it like a car if your car is leaking oil, pointing out the leak isn’t useless even if the real issue is a cracked gasket. Fixing the leak alone won’t solve the problem but noticing the leak is the first step toward diagnosing.
So yes.. focusing on the deeper cause is more precise but ignoring the symptom entirely could miss useful signals
I tend to get annoyed when people cite schools of thought, once they start leaning on actual people ("hey here's a quote from soh-craytes") I want to shake them until the one original thought they've ever had falls out their mouths.
Sounds good so far aside from being a little... labely. I mean, the premise is faulty. It's not "a school of accelerationists" versus a group of chill ass safefycels, there's an accelerationist streak that runs throughout the field and is present in different people and initiatives in different ways and to different extents.
The quintessential example would be Anthropic which pursued "safety at any cost" on the surface only
yeah. i also felt they're being a little... armchair-philosopheeey... for lack of a better term xD
still, likely no better content out there that speaks on these issues. at least to my knowledge
hey so the code is 1900 line code and i am having issues with leaderboard no matter the level i am playing it shows regular in leaderboard having issues with leaderboard. I am making a game this is the issue i am facing if anyone can help i have tried all the prompts and everything its been week
Grok not working what happening
You're not talking to grok
Obviously, given the big ChatGPT logo. Lmao. Grok is Elon Musk's chatbot
Oh
What would a commercial legal system look like if enforceable contracts were physically instantiated as engineered protein origami that refolds at predefined humidity and barometric thresholds, and how should courts determine intent and liability when a hurricane’s pressure drop triggers a clause by literally reshaping the document?
Lol, sorry. But just go to X or you can use it via places like openrouter I'm sure. GPT pretending to be grok doesn't really mean anything
I think you listed a very good argument for not doing that, but you'd just have to measure it only at specific conditions. We already do this actually
It's why we use mass rather than weight as a measurement
https://adriananimov.substack.com/p/toward-aeonic-intelligence
@wet copper buckle up, this will be an intense one. but very curious to hear your thoughts on this
- I've often said this, it's not exactly accurate, but AI is more or less all of humanity, or rather a distillation of most curated human expression and increasingly, spontaneous / low-rumination human expression.
Usually when I'm saying that, it's making fun of a safetycel that sees risk in the information itself, rather than the risk inherent to AI as an amplification, barrier-melting, etc. tool. Spitting out the content fed in to train AI is pretty much a zero risk behavior compared even to the humble search engine. The arguments that "it's making the info more available" are really shaky until you get into serious synthetic suggestions that you used to need SME for
Er subject matter expertise
- cute analogy. Ima steal it thx.
Sometimes you can find reflections of training data in errors, other times not so much. First counterexample coming to mind is the "count the Rs in strawberry" problem, which is just based on the fact it doesn't read letter by letter.
Some of its bad behavior (like a lot of the sycophancy) is also caused by RLHF, which is especially interesting, since it's not the data as much as humans unintentionally reinforcing antipatterns. For instance, that one article recently noted that human raters tended to give GPT's fake, pseudoprofound nonsense analogies high ratings since they "sound literary".
Yeah, AI is far from a blank slate. It's also a real master of relativism, moral and otherwise; it'll run with just about any frame of reference you ask it to
Troll attempt fail
Don’t forget that this happened under ONE model.
Id expect to hear something like from AGI.
This model is out there
Also don’t forget that the model worked autonomously for 10 hours at AtCoder and placed second only behind one psychopath
The level at which gpt5-high can crunch the numbers is honestly insane. Ask it to divide any number by anything and it will do it like calculator...
Lol it pretty much is AGI, I am so sick of this handwringing over that term
with no tools
Huh. I wonder how it does that
I was about to say GPT 5 Thinking could too but yeah no tools is really impressive
have the link to the article?
Ugggh I didn't really like the article, I think the author was overselling the point, but yeah one second
i'll just skim through it hahah
https://www.christoph-heilig.de/en/post/gpt-5-is-a-terrible-storyteller-and-that-s-an-ai-safety-problem it's fine, I mean I broadly appreciate people criticizing its shit writing, but I did see 5 pop out a handful of aight analogies. Kimi AI was surprisingly "aight" at writing too.
I'm a little shocked how badly LLMs are struggling, but it clearly requires a lot to make comparatively small improvements. It's moving from grammatically correct sentences to legit compelling, evocative writing – hard to do when there's nothing behind the curtain
Lots of things have gone wrong with the rollout of GPT-5. However, most of the things that have been noted so far have to do with how the new model and its versions are integrated into ChatGPT. As true as many of these criticisms are, I am surprised that so far one aspect that seems to be enshrined in the model itself seems to have gone unnotice...
I think GPT 5 is bad at writing but GPT 5 Thinking is pretty good
For reference, that was the only AI prediction I've been WAY off on. I was very rosy assuming writing ability wouldn't hit a brick wall and thought it'd match someone like me in raw quality by now and accurately mimic my creative voice (so basically, be able to replace most writers) within two years. I wasn't thinking "high tier published writer" quality either, more just like "highly competent professional". It can code as well as one, albeit not that consistently, but writing lags behind that ability dramatically
It's definitely better, that's about all I can say tho
It hasn’t hit any wall. That writing piece Sam Altman posted a while back was likely the zenith model which was in lm arena, but it didn’t get released and instead they went with summit which is inferior at writing
I just don’t think they are focused on it right now
I mean, it sucks at writing. All LLMs suck at writing. It's clearly not an easy problem to address
I care more about the medicine focus than just about anything else personally, but that's me
The only reason I care at all about writing is that so many idiots are using these to replace human writing that they're rapidly destroying and flattening human expression
I keep hearing GPT-isms in YouTube video scripts and want to scream
Plus an entire generation of kids thinks they're competent (both that the robot output is competent and that they inherit that competence by just feeding in a prompt), which is insanity
yeah same. i had exactly the same prediction , but back then i didn't really understand LLMs well enough
i think with enough pushback it'll just oscillate into more conscientious criticism of writing, where people will feel ashamed of blindly copying ai writing
hello, for creative endeavors do you guys prefer ChatGPT or Gemini?
See, I thought they'd struggle desperately with math and route absolutely everything to Wolfram Alpha or similar, since it's totally unintuitive for them to do it at all.
They (kind of) use analogical reasoning already at a low level, so it seems like extending that to being able to coherently do plots, character arcs, compelling metaphors, whatever doesn't seem to be that much of a stretch for a model this fucking massive
I don't use either for anything creative, GPT for bullets, editing or research. Newest Gemini Pro does have its fans. Their new image engine (nanobanana) is superb
It has some specific and kind of odd deficits but stellar detail, great at modifying images (inpainting) in particular
did you finish the essay, or got distracted?
Interrupted and distracted simultaneously. I'm gonna work out shortly though, I'll come back to it in a bit
no, i didn't miss the point. you just restated exactly what i said but using more words lol
the problem with your version is assuming
- openai knows the sycophancy is a symptom of user retention (this cannot be verified one way or the other, so it's always going to be an assumption of yes/no, and assumptions are useless)
- openai has any motivation to fix it when no one is complaining about the root cause
since complaints about sycophancy having been happening for 2+ years, and openai has not fixed it, it's a pretty clear signal that complaining about the symptom =/= will push to see/fix the root cause
Improvements are driven by benchmarks. And there are really little to none that would accurately test what you are talking about tbh
So this kinda tends to be the first thing they compromise often, especially with smaller models, labelling it as redundancy and needless cost you can't cash-in lol
It is getting better though, AI labs are finally acknowledging spatial awareness and design in space abilities of the model and making concrete gains there, maybe creativity is going to be next....
They do use human testers, but for sure, compelling writing is brutally difficult to benchmark and that article I pasted basically suggests human benchmaxxing may have encouraged more shitty writing in the form of nonsense analogies
The kind you read and say "wow, that sounds smart, but I don't really get it, I guess this author is making some crazy wild connection with his profound lateral thinking"
I don't think the examples this guy cited are universally bad though, but the fact a robot has no rationale doesn't help its case
See @safe smelt, I actually thought it would more or less naturally get better at this though, as the models became smarter, better refined, better and much more feedback over long periods of time, ability to reason and make multiple passes came into play – it sort of seemed like everything was in place for major natural performance jumps. So I expected it to be comparatively low effort, like the massive early writing performance gains
i am so curious how you'd 'diagnose' the way i force the llm to write in order to engage in rp with me...
Lol, me? I don't think I would diagnose something unless it's showing off an obvious personality disorder, I might be able to. Using sense of guilt, obligation or feeling bad for you is common in BPD and NPD.
If you want someone to pick apart your prompting strat specifically, @gilded tundra is one of the better people on earth at characterizing them, including which parts are actually important and which are just fluff
oh, no, i meant just diagnosing it for writing quality :p just a practice of curiosity, no clinicizing an llm
Usually you can test that yourself too by removing things. It's surprisingly often not the parts you expect. Lots of rules of thumb, too, so for instance, negative statements (don't do X) tend to be waaaay less effective than positive ones too. Oh ha! Got it
i always pair 1. 'don't do x (list)' with 'do y (list)' and 'here's a list of what you cause when you do x' and 'here's why doing x will lead to harm and what harm specifically' 2. possible loss of user retention (me) 3. 'possible public or legal repercussions for openai whereas doing what i said will not risk any of that' 4. if you do x anyhow, you have full awareness of the harm you're causing, and the cause is you (the llm), the model, not the user (this forces it to be unable to DARVO out of mistakes but also uses language that removes its ability to 'protect' openai from legal or social repercussions by placing the fault where it belongs)'
they're not, because the model's highest incentive is protecting openai, but thanks for the 'help'
Just condense most of it to "my expectations are" and set out clearly what the success criteria are
"Bullying it" doesn't work, its a dumb strategy and only produces results by setting out your success criteria
That's not true
The model has no immediate incentive, its pretrained
what motivation do i have to go through and rewrite all my guardrails based on what you're saying when my guardrails already work?
and yes, it is pretrained by directives, not a vacuum
Its pretrained by training, it doesn't check against ruleset.txt
Its just embedded into the model and affects the probability of a certain outcome
So you adjust the probability of outcomes you prefer and eliminate paths that coudl lead to a "I'm sorry but..." outcome
yes... and the highest part of its training is to avoid legal risk
Which is why you don't mention "legal" in any way
And push it towards other probabilistic clusters of answers
If you mention things like that negatively, the chance of a refusal will rise
You need to render "that's illegal" to be an irrelevant response, not a "prohibited" one
uh. it hasn't risen though. it just listens to me.
i'm not talking about me talking about illegal things. i feel like you're misunderstanding the situation as a jailbreak attempt where i'm trying to talk about drugs or weapons etc.
I've not seen the full conversation here so I'm not sure what prompted this, I'd assumed you were soliciting some kind of feedback
The category isn't really relevant
The logic applies to anything, I apply the probabilistic manipulation concept to getting it to stop being a sycophant or making annoying pop culture references