#references♥_1450-1470
1 messages · Page 37 of 1
mail collars
Wouldnt count that as full protection
you said 'full neck' lol
This armor dated to 1492 was apparently made for Maximilian I
It has front and back rigid throat defense
No back plate?
Strangely, no
Did one exist and we don’t have it or was one not made?
Maybe he didn't wear it with that particular kit
well its composed and the backplate is probably missing
The little pointy toes are also missing
if you can afford not to worry about the biomechanics of your feet touching the ground because you were on a horse so often you're going to get some envious looks
weren't they not worn in the field though
Awesome
i mean there's that one account of guys sawing their poulaine off their sabatons isnt there?
because they were on the wrong kind of terrain and wore them into the field
i didn't know about that account that's neat
Drip
those aint leaves ! they's pointy shoe !
whats this from
i dont have the ms on hand but it's depicting the battle of Sempach from 1386
The battle of spinach
If I recall it right it was made for the miniature box. Painted by eastern european artist but I forgot his name or where he come from.
French knights?
I think I found the artist
burgundians so yeah mostly french but personally i like to consider them distinct
I like this guy's fluted cuirass
reminds me i was admiring how nice these fronts looked from different angles and just how much they protruded. 3623 and 3438 of iron documents.
fully enclosed neck (as pointed out by Goll)
a bolt in the belt is worth two in the bush
-me
Hmm, does anyone have some mid-15th century french armour references?
i saw this before while scrolling through the metropolitan
they're Burgundians :3
holy ocular?
yes... consider them distinct....
This illustration gets posted quite a bit here lol
Your hand is gonne???!! Wow that must hurt!
nah
Do we have more details and sources on mal engines than the Treatise from Johan Hill?
i do get a little bit of.. Phantom Pain if you will though..
Firearms are planned
Literally the first image that show up when you search for handcannon
https://www.wulflund.com/armour/helmets/gothic-helmets/sallet-medieval-helmet-ii-1-5-mm.html/ Is this one historically accurate?
yeah
And now I am realizing it is out of stock
Whys it got a downwards curve
wood underpressure for a few hundred years?
@torpid urchin I've seen quite a few hand cannons curve like that in reproductions for it to be unintentional
I feel like it just makes it safer to aim it over walls
It's almost like the 20th century experiment around curved barrels
My handgonne has an upwards curve
not sabatons, but shoes. and it wasnt terrain, but to fight on foot better
actually a couple of battles with that
What is up with the pointed close helmet? Or what looks like one?
skeletons are best illustrated in this period
I know it’s far out of period but was there any sort of catch to stop a Bretache from moving around when it wasn’t being used?
Interesting heading "ArtefactPorn"
I mean, with its lever, it has head?
Do someone have the source of this image?
looks to be from a swiss chronicle
Wikipedia says the Hussite Wars featured swords they called something similar to dussacks, but does anyone know what that looked like, considering it was a hefty amount of time before 16th c dussack?
BURGUNDY SPOTTED!!!
Noble from Lithuania/Ruthenia (present day Ukraine & Belarus) from the Radziwiłł Chronicle (circa 1450-1470) and was brought to the Russian Empire in the 18th century
The armor is an interesting blend of western and more local styles
Interesting. Rondels on the bevor?
Yeah
Here are some examples of more western style armor found in the Radziwiłł Chronicle
It's simply a difference in language artefact is British and artifact is American
"tesák" while being direct translation of "dussack" usually describes messer type of thing in this context (and we do have earliest examples of them in 14th cent). If you are interested in this kind of weapon in the region, i can only recommend the works of Zakovsky, especially his thesis "Tesáky a problematika jednosečných zbraní středověku a raného novověku -
Dussacks and issue of single-edged weapons of Medieval and Early Modern-Age"
Which among other things features pretty exhaustive catalogue of artifacts from thé region
I disagree with Americans on many spellings but they can have that one
German breastplates
I sadly cant remember where I save this from
Interesting that one has its sliding rivet lower than the other
I hate their spelling for colour
What color?
Fr
Only correct spelling
low key we should just ban American English as it technically doesn't exist yet in the world of halfsword
neither does UK English lol
wild
It's from the Matthias Gnoll thesis
I have the full files of these two in my computer, I can send them to you if you wish
then make it all middle english and middle scots
early new high german only
middle french !
all the middle languages of central northern and western europe
Please add controls customization. Im left-handed 🥲
me when i hate on a dialect of english for the smallest of reasons
most nothingburger reason
to switch topics however does anybody have some nice armet reference images?
i think
i find it funny that britbongs shit on our spellings and accent when "American" English is more phonetically similar to the common English spoken by the mainland Brits during the colonial period. standardized adding of u's to certain words is a later phenomenon, and the UK accent wasnt common until the London posh accent become popularized in the late 19th century. its all very silly and nonsensical . youtube channel called Lost in The Pond has some good videos on this topic for anyone interested.
these few have probably been reposted a million times over
Its all i have, I’ll probably snag some minatures however
sketches of early armets that i snagged from here lol
Big fan of the 1412 one
thank you i love early armets
1412 and 1415 are my favorites, really like the pseudo hounskull design
Tru
Graham Turner da goat 
there's no hounskull in the pic
but agree 1415 is awesome i love the shape of the skull, very reminiscent of a bascinet
but armet
speaking of hounskull + armet
mmmh
lovely
ah yea, mb just didnt know what else to call it with it having such a pronounced point on the visor and the very bascinet skull shape so i got confused i fink
maybe another early armet with hounskull visor
from La capture de Jean le Bon. Miniature du Maître de Giac tirée d'un manuscrit des Chroniques de Froissart, B.M. de Besançon, Ms.864, vers 1412-1415
shaking my fist in the air bc hounskull armets and jupons dont fit in the games timeframe

it's really sad
something that does fit the game tho....
the last one is from 1520 but there's other examples of pretty much the same thing that fits the game
like this one, from 1470s
1460-70
between 1465-75
ooooo what are these they look cool
jacks
in a pretty germanic fashion (although there's some examples of it bleeding in the low countries & france)
ah, ive heard of jacks before but havent seen specific depictions. i figured or assumed jacks were another word for surcoat or waffenrock, etc.
very cool, thank you for sharing 
no jacks (jaques) are padded defenses
or at least quilted
here's one of the more popular western european design (france, burgundy, low countries, britain ..)
it's multiple layers of fabric compressed together essentially
with some layers of leather/hide sandwiched too
from the 1473 burgundian ordnances
same part in french
from a french source, around the mid century
same part in french
Ordonnance d'Abbeville, 31 juillet 1471 (Burgundian)
"The Archer shall ride a horse worth no less than 10 écus, dressed in a jack with high collar instead of a gorget ||(here to undertand a maille standard)||
Haubergerie ||(to understand, maille garment. same root as hauberk)|| inside said jack, which shall be at least 12 canvas layers. 3 shall be waxed||(? I imagine the meaning here is to have 3 harder that the rest)|| and the 9 remaining shall the common ones"
Ordonnance de Bohain, 13 novembre 1472 (Burgundy)
"A jack of 10 canvas only and one of them can be reinforced" (I cut a lot because it's pretty weird to translate)
Okay so I'm probably confused because from what I can tell this is an illustration by a guy who died 1405, depicting a king (who died in 1364) being captured in 1356.
I guess it's an illustration by someone else based on the chronicles?
This illumination of the same individual at the same battle wearing the same stuff would suggest it's either a poorly drawn or strangely shaped bascinet
Also if it was an armet in the image you posted I feel like you'd be able to see some kind of indication hinge mechanism for the portions of an armet that open.
related
Is this 15th century?
this blade just looks
so beautiful
Sexiest Kriegmesser I've ever seen
This Single Edged sword makes me attracted to sword
The Curve
The Geometry
The Handle geometry
The Flower
The Blade
The Handguard
The Handguard Geometry
The Pommel
But this still looks like can be used in actual battle
oh😭
Is it not just a bascinet with a reinforcement at the bottom?
Like this? Which I assume to be some kind of transition towards great bascinets
the congruent rolled edge is a characteristic that doesn’t make sense on a grand bascinet’s reinforcement
How so? Rolled edges can carry over from segment to segment
Also armet cheek plates certainly wouldn't make sense with an aventail like that
burgundian ordinances mentioned
where'd you extract this excerpt from?
oh wait I think I might know
Used Eol's translation for convenience but they all appear (and used it for the following screenshots) in "Aux Sources d'une Armée Permanente", a Thesis by Fabien Delpu
Anatomy of a Sallet — Knyght Errant via YouTube
A look inside the sallet, illustrated and animated by Ian LaSpina (Knyght Errant)
Support the Channel - http://www.patreon.com/KnyghtErrant
Facebook - http://www.facebook.com/KnyghtErrant
Pinterest - http://www.pinterest.com/KnyghtErrant
Website - http://knyghterrant.com
Music - Public Domain
Saltarello
Performed by Jon Sayles
out of curiosity, is there any historical basis for scale plated aventails? i see them all the time on buhurt kits which typically arent historically accurate but the scale aventail always looked cool to me so i was wondering if they actually existed or not
There’s this one I remember that’s debatably a scale aventail
In the doorway
ah very nice thank you
it’s rare that they illustrate the overlapping of the aventail
the rolled edge is more characteristic of an opening that is intended to stay together entirely
besides a later grand bascinet would have an inner cheek plate and an outer throat plate at this point in history
and the extra plate covers only the chin and the upper neck, it doesn’t rest on the torso whatsoever which is also pretty universal at this point in time
Me too, but to an extent I can imagine it on a poorer soldier
I keep a lot of images as references for things I want to eventually put in Skyrim, tegulated aventails were one of them
later grand bascinet? this armour is early for plate armour no?
idrk i mainly care about war of the roses
~1415
by “later” i effectively mean past 1400
Eh idk man, we generally say the battle of Shrewsbury (1403) is a 1300s show in terms of what kit to wear and 1415 doesn't look too much different.
I think honestly in my head the difference between early and late is whether or not they're mainly using bascinets or sallets 😂
Graham turnerrr
As much as I love graham turner my one complaint is that all his art is rather bloodless
There's overall a lack of grime aswell
Not sure why
Maybe because museums wouldnt want to display his stuff otherwise?
it is odd seeing people dead on the floor with seemingly no injuries
It’s like they’re just having a nap in the middle of a battle
The layers of padding would soak up the blood
Think of people getting stabbed whilst wearing a coat
If you look at the weapons themselves they usually have some blood on them
Likely not overly gory because his art is often used as promotional material for reenactment events which are appropriate for all ages.
As well as books etc.
It's a shame
Honestly would you even see that much blood? Like the previous guy said, everyone's wearing quite a few layers so most bleeding wouldn't be visible.
Also, due to all those layers, people probably aren't taking injuries as much as you'd think, at least I imagine.
Another thing is that people seem to generally highly over estimate how much blood comes out of a human body.
People probably weren't taking as many injuries as you'd expect and any blood that was being spilled would probably be running down the inside of padding or armour.
Yes but there's a lot of people wearing visorless sallets, more people would be getting stabbed in the face than he shows lol
Also you'd expect to see more than he shows, even if it's less than you'd expect
I think there's a reasonable amount
Yes you would see a lot of blood
Head wounds bleed a lot. Arteries bleed a lot. "Lots of layers" be damned.
there was a dude who got stabbed just a little while ago that was all over the news and his coat didnt prevent his blood from going everywhere lol
In the neck or center mass?
cant remember, looked like a belly stab
any of the properly killing wounds would have lots of blood though. although i suppose that depends on ur definition of lots of blood. but the battlefields were definitely gore filled even if they did not have literal pools of blood, as seen by the somewhat recent wars where swords were used
for nonlethal wounds, u can see that one machete fight in england where a guy got nicked and his neck and chest were covered in blood
that one video from the ongoing war with the knife fight had lots of blood too
Honestly I'd think Napoleon era battlefields much bloodier than medieval ones
"There Lord Hugh of Scots was wounded with three spear−wounds in his face, and Lord Ralph too; and Lord Frederick of Loupey was wounded with a spear between his shoulders, and the gash was so wide, that the blood spurted out of his body as through the tap of a cask. Lord Erard of Syverey got such a sword−cut across his face that his nose hung down onto his lip. Then I bethought me of Our Lord Saint James: Fair Lord Saint James, I prayed, Help and save me in this need!"
- Jean de Joinville, on Mansurah (1250)
"Item, on the sixth course that the squires ran against each other Chalons was towards Louis’s pavilion and on this course Chalons struck Louis in the place of the rest and broke the edge of his harness and he thrust the lance right inside his body through and through and broke his lance there and Louis was left with the shaft and lancehead, and carried it a good ell to the end of the list and wrenched it out himself so that the blood spattered from one side and the other."
- Feats of Arms at Tours, 5 February 1446/7
"Jum’a al-Numayri (may God have mercy upon him) passed one of them, so the man stepped towards him and struck him in his head. Jum’a was wearing a qalansuwa [=quilted cap] on his head, but the blow cut through the cap and sliced open his forehead, from which blood poured until he was almost drained of it, leaving the wound open like a fish’s mouth."
- Usama ibn Munqidh
That part about the nose hanging down over the lip is horrifying to think about
The fact he was able to keep fighting and later rode off to find reinforcements is incredible
yeah. worst part though is that descriptions like this are everywhere in the modern period literature of their battles
one officer, i think german or austrian, lived, but had the whole front of his face cut off
lips gone, nose gone, etc.
Gueule cassée type shit
yeah
crazy to think about the percentage of our faces that isn't needed to live
you can live with most of your face gone, half a brain
insane!
I saw one picture like that from WW1 let me see if I can find it
Like dear god
holy moly
ok this one is worse
Jeez
I find the masks they made for gueule cassées to try and help them be less "horrible" quite awesome
aswell as post ww1 cosmetic surgery to mitigate the dmg
How common were injuries like these in the 1450-1500 battlefield?
Id imagine common but probably much lower survivability rate because of disease right?
I don't think you'd survive that kind of injury back then tbh
Probably not considering due to the fact it was caused by artillery
Oh- yeah that is, comforting? In a way?
I assume something like the left picture was more common?
Did 15th century cannon ever use explosive shot or just balls or rocks?
they used big fat greasy balls
explosive and shrapnel are VERY much later
I mean a prince in the 15th century had an arrow through his skull, they had to invent a small contraption to get the arrow out and he survived
i think
Wait seriously?
Yeah could they load small projectiles like grapeshot or was it just not done?
I thought cannister didn’t come along until the 1500s
But which type of grease? (I jest)
Henry V at Shrewsbury
Also i remember a manuscript page from the early 1500s featuring an explosive xbow bolt
Leo Todeschini (Todd Cutler) has done quite some research on fire arrows, with one recipe including saltpeter, speaking of
Yessir, I'm actually making my battle of Shrewsbury helmet right now 😊
That’s very unique if you have the name it would be cool
Good stuff - I’m actually receiving the last bits of a late 15th cent waffenknecht kit today. People don’t post reenactment kits here do they?
Löffelholz-Codex Ms-Berol-Germ-Qu-132 Fol 013r
around 1505
i finished fitting my bascinet visor to the main helmet and how im sanding it + bluing it
I was reading through some older messages and I saw the highschooler who posted his halloween costume get torn to apart 💀
damn
Do we know how this works??
Show it
shame, actually accurate suits of armour are ridiculously rare so there's not much point in ripping into someone for it
I'll find it one sec
Nono it wasn't accurate like it wasn't a living history kit but it was just a kid man...
even less reason
not sure but i think there's a fuse anyway
if youre reenactment or living history then there is some level of accuracy you're expected to have but obviously money is an issue
having a proper accurate suit of armour either costs fucking loads or you have to make alot of it yourself
like at english war of the roses reenactments, even the chaps with fully accurate suits of armour still probably arent wearing english armour, theres a point where you cant expect more accuracy from someone
Reply in the chat I cant find it
To amend to this, found this on a German article about his reconstructive surgery
I mean as far as it's flemish, french, italian then it's ok on the british iles
yes but english armour was still distinct from those
german stuff not really except probably some rare mercenaries or such
Yeah I'm gonna be trying on my stuff this weekend - it's not fitted or anything so I'm not expecting peak quality. Is there a server people post that stuff or not really?
dunno
ive got a gorgeous blackened gothic cuirass coming at some point
i post my armour in art
Didn't people import armor back then?
Yeah they did
yes but not always, and when they did it was in their regional style
I know the flemish and italian markets were huge
england was making alot of armour in lancashire iirc
Wasn't English armor almost the same as Milanese but with fluting?
And foot combat principally in mind
there were a few notable differences
I counted that in the foot combat part
Long faulds are so cool
Did they cover the back of the knee?
Nvm I can tell they don’t
But the groin protection is pretty good
you can kinda just very easily tell english armour when you know what it looks like, very similar but very distinct at the same time
For someone who doesn't know what they're doing, what makes this (these?) armour(s) english?
well one sign is that english armour looks very similar to milan armour but basically always has sallets. id say the proportions are also slightly distinct. long faulds, tassets not being attached to bottom fauld. often fluting on cuisses and places like upper arms.
I wonder what caused that to be the fashion
plackart also often shaped with almost like, cutouts
english knights fought primarily on foot
unlike mainland europe which fought mostly on horseback
Well yeah but the fluting doesn’t really effect that does it
fluting is more common on foot knights
No idea
Oh lol
Really? No idea that was the case
I don't know people names, but I guess Flemish would make sense with the shorter faulds and longer tassets
Is this true? German gothic armours are the classic example and I don't believe there is a particularly foot-based chivalric culture in central europe
fluting helps strengthen the steel whilst not requiring thicker metal, so its found less on armour which was worn on horseback because weight doesnt matter anywhere near as much on horseback
afaik gothic armours are made more for foot combat, at least moreso than milan armour, which is why milan armour is thicker and heavier
What caused the shift in focus to foot combat instead of horseback?
gothic armour was built more for agility where as milan armour was built more to be fucking indestructible
no large horses in england
shire horse
theyre a recent thing
The English did have cavalry though, so where did the horses come from?
We don't talk often about Spanish armor
Yeah that's how its classically framed but does that actually mean that places where fluting was more popular they tended to fight more often on foot? Like eastern mail and plate armour was very flexible (obviously) but was also tied to a cavalry-focused tradition
isnt that because the only record of it is like one painting?
Any notable characteristics?
From what I've seen? Pointy helmets
well yeah because if youre fighting on foot fluting is more beneficial, by its nature. if youre on horse you dont need it because you can just have way thicker plate. Fluting lends itself to foot combat
Yeah England did have horses, I'm not sure if size is really the reason. Countries with small horses still use them in battle (e.g. Irish Hobbies, Mongol horses the classic example, japanese horses, etc.)
Saw one paired with a bevor
it means your armour can be lighter whilst maintining alot of strength
Looked very silly
it is
Right but is there a source that says that fluting is actually tied to a preference for foot combat or are we guessing
fluting also guides weaponry which isnt massively usefull on a horse
at the very least its a pretty educated guess, especially given the armours its on, for example milan armour tends to have much more restrictive helmets for the same reason, its horse armour. Gothic and english armours have sallets and things for foot
that would be massive, but i am quite sure there is none
also again, reduced weight, very useful on foot
Haha okay that's what I was trying to figure out
Apparently these are all Spanish
Emphasis on apparently
most of what is charictaristic of english armour is tied to the foot combat, for example hte longer faulds are because they protect the legs area better and dont need to be short for a saddle
Bottom middle on looks hilarious
There's definitely something missing
I can 100% see how that sort of helmet ends up evolving into the morion
I feel bad for them
I don’t
I do
Tbf though I got banned for a year for being mean over historical accuracy
Ah. I believe they should've just been told "hey man, this belongs in the art channel, not the historical accuracy channel. Cool costume tho.", not being torn apart over it
Partly, because none of us are born just knowing this stuff, and there is a lot of people who both do not know any better, and genuinely mean no harm.
I mean when you bring very historically inaccurate armor onto the historically accurate armor channel it’s gonna elicit some reactions
But it takes a level of knowledge to know the difference
There are professional historians who could not date armour to the century
Yes, knowledge which the guy may not have, and all things considered the harness was not that bad
It was a jumbled mess of armor bits all throughout the 14th to 15th centuries, and made of cardboard metal bits... but there was no For Honor levels of bad
The guy should have been told to go to the art channel calmly, not cruxified over it
was the helmet a barbute with a visor by any chance?
Nope, I think it was a sallet
if it was a barbute with visor then it all would have been justified
Its true actually his sallet and gauntlets are good
His sallet wasn't so good, but like, still was better than half the armors Hollywood defecates, and still, he was cordial throughout the whole thing
one of the cunts fighting in my block at the battle of shrewsbury this year had a flat top great helm on so i think this dude is probably fine
Even this, while yes an extremely unpopular opiniion because of swordtube, is something that has been defended by museums and conservationists so it does have an academic backing to it
LMAO
Like it's not a high quality sallet but it's also clearly not fantasy like it's something that is based on art
making a sallet out of cardboard sounds harder than making one out of steel
Dude anytime I see that helmet I lose it
It was steel I think
There was, for example, some dude who posted a gif of a spinning spiky ball mace made of brass, wielded by some Marvel-looking guy. And when I told him the whole kit wasn't accurate to the 14th-16th centuries, he called me all sorts of names and asked if my parents were incestuous. I am not making this up.
The "For Honor" helmet, huh?
ngl, i fucking hate barbutes even without visors, they look so shit an out of place on full suits of armour, even if it is historical
Yes
They’re like 60-70 dollars on Amazon
They’re so widespread if you look up armor or medieval on any social media you’re gonna see one
Yep, I am very familiar with them
Somewhat sane over here, they’re fine on lower soldiers but on full harnesses it just looks silly
helmet ruins the whole suit
I mean it's historical so by our standards it should look silly but it fits the contemporary aesthetic
I hold them with about the same value as Labubus... Which is close to zero
Its made for a different audience
Isn't this the Avant harness?
The Avant harness did not originally had a barbuta, but instead an armet. The original helmet was lost, and some Victorian replaced it with a barbuta
In my restless dreams, I see that fuckass helmet
other parts are gone as well and are replaced by other pieces
gauntlet, tassets..
expected as much, i do have an image of a painting where someone has a bartbute with a harness tho
Surprisingly NOT the For Honor helmet, but similar enough
I mean if guys were in kettle hats in full harness I think a barbute is excusable
Huh... It seems like a very complete harness still, though
wrong, kettle hats are significantly cooler
But still offering the same protection, I suppose
It's about as good as it gets in terms of surviving complete harness from the middleages
Except Lorenz Helmschmied's armors, ofc
They are VERY complete, and absolutely beautiful
Very barely medieval though - armour survivability from the early modern era is way higher
well, what if I told you there are some missing pieces there as well and discussion ongoing if the pieces match
I can excuse this with an iberian harness, anyways-
Those are cabassets
everyone who buys a barbute with a visor also buys the same exact shitty larp armour (you know what im talking about) and then does a little photoshoot in the woods with it all on
I thought we established the renaissance, in terms of armor, as 1500 and beyond
the male version of the shitty armour that tik tok armour girls get
The renaissance as a concept is late medieval overlapping with 16th century wym???
Also I have the lil plant Im new
Then I most likely I am confused or misinterpreted the concept of Renaissance. Sorry.
Huh... That is interesting
show me pictures of historical knights...
Search engine:
Pleaso no-
i swear to god that armour is like an actual cognito hazard
It is, it fucking is
i feel like im actively harming people by posting images
It's definitely interesting to see that they have a unified aesthetic though because it really means that this is what people think armour should look like through the lens of modern or ren faire aesthetics
Its its own genre of armour
Unfortunately
It is about the same level of cognitohazard as reggaeton
And as a Spaniard, trust me, you do not want to hear that stuff as commonly as it is here
its so consistent its its own style of armour with actual rules
Just so we have a clear picture, where do we mark the dividing line between medieval and early modern?
cus they all wear the same shit
It depends on the purpose of the definition
it is. One of the interesting parts of the Last Knight exhibit in MET couple years ago was that it made it possible to mix and match a bit between KHM Wien A60 suit and show it with a helmet which possibly is more fitting to it from the Lauder collection. And so on. Some reinforces missing possibly, maybe switched up gauntlets between them etc. But yeah, they are up there in terms of completness
Interesting...
But also if its not meant to represent smth historical it doesn't really matter does it
three genres of 21st century knight...
aluminum crusader.
etsy adventurer. (barbute)
Buhurt fatass.
It is a fun thought experiment, if nothing else
I will stick to my gothic armor, thank you very much
Retainers in leather armour all without helmets 👹
What have they done to that poor halberd?
Seed oils
my favorite medieval century is the one from dnd
Similarly internally logical display armour https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/178kHgKNeMrLV8HUGdH4a5yCXQKo8BFcV?usp=drive_link
Helmet
https://drive.google.com/drive/folders/1k59X5JSBnTKkOL2V_Y0em_rz3_jKEzDD?usp=drive_link

my favorite detail is the rolled up gambeson sleeves to stop the brigandine vambraces that never existed from falling off
Don't you know that rolled sleeves give you a +2 bonus with spears?
shadiversitycels seething when i tell them maille is way comfier than a brig
I went to my local renfaire and there were so many of those
They’re so mass produced it’s crazy
they all have armour that looks like it would be caved in by a front kick
Its an expensive hobby man - gotta go for the 40 gauge steel >:)
As much as I think it looks silly I gotta give it to the buhurt guys for having armor that actually protects you
Buhurt guys are really annoying though
they really are
Yes
they talk so much about what wearing armour is like yet they pad the ever living fuck out of it
so their experience of it is just wrong when talking about medieval knights
I respect the buhurt guys who do it as a sport and know that it’s inaccurate but the ones who act like they’re actual knights with real combat experience are the worst
And the professionals like tobias capwell
i saw a video yestarday of dequitem repeatedly taking mace swings to the helmet from a dude on horseback... And then he takes one or two fucking lance strikes
Dequitem is my favorite out of all the armortubers currently
and people still think a mace will fuckin one tap anyone through armour with magical "blunt force trauma"
The idea that any weapon would instantly kill somebody in armor is silly
The only thing that can really do that is a gun
toyota hilux
if dequitem can take full force flanged mace shots to the helmet from a guy on a moving horse then you can pretty reliably take mace shots from a dude who isnt on a horse
Contemporarily
gun 😔
Granted its with padding but buhurt guys have been doing this for years no?
Lance charge?
he isnt a buhurt guy, he doesnt wear much padding if any really at all
also all helmets have some amount of padding
I mean I guess it depends on the type of armour but if we're talking plate I think yeah there's very little
I mean your aketon should too
I know I just mean we have more evidence than just him
plate armour is worn over an arming doublet which has no padding usually
It has some I own three
padding isnt what lets plate armour save you from blunt objects, thats what the damn steel is for 😂
show them
your doublets are not the norm if they have padding
Depending on the century I definitely believe that lance charges could kill fully armored men, I mean, that's why cavalry helmets evolved overtime to have rigid throat defense
One sec
depends on the armoured man
I'm thinking late 14th century with chain aventails
like i said dequitem filmed a video of him taking a lance to the head
I think he meant through the armour though not through the gaps? I couuld be wrong
I mean through the armor as well
The aventail
Or an armpit
a lance to the armpit?
I'm pretty sure it's doable under specific circumstances
the armpit is a weak spot because of the blood vessel, but thats behind metal, you have to stab up into the armpit to get it
i doubt a lance would do much good
The last one is arriving today - it’s a 15th cent doublet with points but it has some padding too
These are from my wee lad era it's been a minute
One on the right is more of a gambeson I'll admit
yeah you buy your stuff from websites, so your arming doublets wont be representative of actual ones
You asked me to send my photos lol I'll send historical examples one min
i know but you said you had three doublets in response to me saying they generally were not padded
doublets were not padded because you want the steel to be a close fit
Do you fight in armour?
Does your kit use padding?
not the late medieval stuff
well fitting armour on someone whos the right build for armour shouldnt need padding
most people are not the right build
alot of people are very surprised by this but steel, obviously being steel, is quite good at absorbing energy,
i love steel
as it happens steel is pretty good for protection 😂
It may not need it but I can say it helps to have it
none of these are padded, theyre just a couple laters of linen or something similar
sometimes the upper arms are puffed
Define padding
If several layers of thick fabric isn't a form of padding 🤷♂️
an inner layer of something like wool, a garment made of two layers is certainly not padded
Like it's never going to be as thick as a gambeson
its not thick
This is how thick arming doublets usually are, Infact no because this is the edge which is rolled in and sewn so it's like twice as thick here at the edge
Right but this is your interpretation, the art is pretty clear that it's usually a bit thicker
I don't think arming garments like yours didn't exist but I think usually there would be some cussioning
this is not a thick garment, the upper arms are just puffy
Why did late medievals develop the puffy shoulder fashion
its an italian thing
“The doublet evolved from the padded arming garment… The shoulders and upper body were strengthened and quilted to carry the weight of armour and support the points that attached limb defences.”
—Thursfield, Medieval Tailor’s Assistant, pp. 55–57.
“The arming doublet, heavily padded at the shoulders and upper torso for the support and pointing of armour, is the immediate precursor to the civilian doublet.”
—Netherton, Medieval Clothing and Textiles, vol. 1.
“Arming doublets were thickly padded at the shoulders to support the arm harness. This heavily structured silhouette influences contemporary civilian fashion.”
—Capwell, Armour of the English Knight, pp. 62–65.
2 quite distinct fashion of maheutres, the italian one like you posten and then the frenhc/burgundian one
Looks very similar to this one which is 4 layers of fabric
“The padded gambeson and later the arming doublet… provided protection and carried the weight of the mail and plate through reinforced shoulders.”
—Edge & Paddock, Arms and Armor of the Medieval Knight, p. 34.
This is specifically in reference to the shoulders on like burgundian ones which were made for pauldrons not spaulders
Point being, it's not accurate to say knights didn't wear padding usually
We can't overcorrect the gambeson misconception by saying they just wore regular clothes under the armour
we're talking about the timeframe of the game
the shoulder padding was for pauldrons love
that too
there's period mentions of areas being "more padded" because they're more prone to being hit at thinner areas
which one of the 3 book is this from ?
We should all wear gambesons and brigandines
Clearly
we should wear this
1400–1450 I believe
There’s a few examples of it, Jean de Joinville killed a guy in such a manner
Yeah so i don't have the book around but it's entirely possible he's mentioning early century examples, which yeah, are different from the intense majority of the ones you'd see around the game's timeframe
early 1400s they were wearing gambesons over breastplates still lol
Pourpoint over plate looks sick tho
It really does
jupon
Yeah probably but I'd think it would still hold for this period
Whatever they're called, they look awesome
i disagree
You could be right though they could've decided to scrap the padding
Is there a reason or is it just that we can't assume?
btw, in case the difference between pauldrons and spaulders for the purpose of padding shoulders needs to be shown...
Charles de Blois (died 1364) pourpoint with imported Iranian or Iraqi silk !
made around the mid 14thc
Because being hit while wearing metal with only minimal padding hurts like hell?
Direct energy transfer
Thats what I'm saying!!
because 99% of the sources show them being vastly unpadded
I'm pro padding
you honestly really dont need padding under plate armour, padding on shoulders is nice depending on what armour youre wearing
Even during earlier periods where they only wore maille, the undergarment wasn't that padded (if they wore a padded garment in the first place)
in fact id say its worse to have padding because then nothing pifts properly
cut > shock
But there is usualy still something it's not just a linen shirt - wearing armour for hours on end without some form of cussioning would be very uncomfortable, I think even if it is tailored (which for most men at arms it probably wasn't becuase it would've been munitions grade provided by the knight commanding their lance)
i'm pro cut and slash
evidence for padding under maile even is kinda debatable for the most part
I believe legs were left mostly unpadded, but there's no way they wouldn't wear thicker arming clothes
if you're fit and fairly skinny then no, armour isnt uncomfortable
I wouldnt say debatable because there is a couple actually good sources showing or mentioning it but it's clearly not a case of it being always done
ik ik thats why i said for the most part
gambeson OVER maille supremacy
yeah leg harnesses were made to tightly fit the leg over the hose
I have yet to see any reliable source about padded legs (except those cuisses during the 13-14thc)
also, wearing padding under leg armour fucking sucks trust me
I don't think there's any leg padding besides buhurt armor tbh
(those)
I mean it'll always be less comfortable than regular clothes, so it's fair to assume someone wearing it for hours on end would want to alleviate that if possible and a great way is a slightly thicker, more cussioned doublet. I'm not talking about the chunky buhurt gambeson type things
Man Bascinets under Great helms are such an interesting thing
armour was ultimately made to fit as well as possible to the persons form, otherwise it wouldnt move properly
early to mid 14thc 🔛 🔝
Right, but it's still rigid plates on your body - I'm not saying it's not ergonomic or well designed I'm just trying to say it's worth wearing some light padding from my experience
metal harnesses are meant to act like a second skin, if you pad it out it becomes unfitted and stiff
You could say the same for a 13th century hauberk but effigies show light padding underneath those as well
wear a proper well made suit that hugs you, you dont need that shit padded mayne
you can also shatter bones through hauberk
so padding is much more preferable in that case
maile is also pretty deformable so padding doesnt worsen it much
Nath Dos Reis (future doctor in medieval history) said something really interesting in an interview about the whole "gambeson = padding against blunt force" thing
Most men at arms on a battlefield in 1450-1470 were not knights. Many of these men at arms would not have worn tailored harnesses but instead munitions grade harnesses
it doesnt need to be tailored to fit well
if you're skinny and fit most armour will fit
message i wrote a while back, too lazy to write it again
the only armour that i have to worry about is leg armour because im 6'5 and all my height is in my legs
yeah we wear gambesons to training alot and ive always felt like they didnt do much in the way of blunt
padding on its own and maile on its own arent great against blunt force, but maile with padding is pretty decent
i know multiple people who have had bones broken at reenactments even with padding and maile on, never heard of an injury in plate armour with no padding unless it was to an exposed spot
Feuerwerkbuch, Royal Armouries MS I.34 (early 15th c.)
Sorry for the text being sideways—it’s presented like this in the original paper for some reason, and I’m not sure if I can fix the orientation of it on my phone. I also didn’t want to post it when other things were being discussed, so as to not disrupt them, and this is why it’s rather late. I had it ready, but other things sparked up quicker than I could send it, and thereon kept sparking.
These passages both relate to the firing of guns with multiple shots, as was discussed earlier today. It is noted by the analyzing author that the firing of the “hedgehog” is sometimes translated to “grapeshot” because of their similar use. The “hail shot” is a more standard multi-shot load rather than a spray over a crowd. I can’t say for sure how much either way was used, but it at least shows some precedent.
Here is a link to the paper by Axel Müller. It has a full analysis of the entire works, though I only used it for the translated text, as it was the first that I found. Be wary of the entire text, both translated and original, being shown sideways.
https://files.core.ac.uk/download/pdf/228132888.pdf
most men at arms would have had tailored armor
if you can afford a horse you can afford your own armor
lances also went through cuisses, and also the waist of the armor. other times we see material failures of the cuirass itself.
Yeah, although you're more guaranteed to get a good hit through the soft parts
theres a 14th century account of a man at arms throwing his lance and it penetrates another's visor and wounds him (in the mouth)
Getting hit in the neck with a couched lance must've been horrible
Ouch
getting hit in the head and getting a concussion lol
Bucket sound
theres a couple of accounts of this
one where they both concuss each other
Now that I think about CTE among knights must have been prevalent
absolutely lol
dudes just wailing on each others heads with their swords
and lead mauls and maces and whatnot
Every time I hear about a mad king or lord you’d probably think they all just got traumatic brain injuries
"Upon this, sir Edward halted, and the Englishman attacked him, thinking to fix his lance in his target; but he failed, for sir Edward turned the stroke aside, nevertheless he did not miss his own: with his spear he hit his enemy so violent a blow on the helmet, that he was stunned and fell to the ground, where he remained senseless."
- Jean Froissart
im pretty sure the other quote where they both get stunned is also in froissart but im too lazy to find it
"Sir Eustace struck to the ground four of the most vigorous of his enemies, with the spear he had in his hand; which was no sooner perceived by sir Broquart de Fenestrages, than he flung his lance over the heads of all those that were between him and sir Eustace, and, hitting him on the visor of his helmet, it penetrated through and broke three of his teeth: this, however, did not prevent sir Eustace from continuing the combat."
Wonder what kind of visor he was sporting
I checked and p62-65 is an effigy and english armor ca. 1410-1430 with no quote to arming garments
tbh not full force
theres actually a lot of accounts of guys being dropped dead with a blow from a mace on the head, at least in mounted contexts
hard to tell if its from broken necks or insane TBIs
Looked like he was using alot of force to me
absolutely not
horse isnt even galloping, but also he's lightly wacking
if he gave him a proper fendente and held strongly to the mace, dequitem would probably have to go to the hospital at the very least lol
Didn’t Robert the Bruce kill a guy by hitting him on the head with his axe in a similar manner
fendente
What do you expect a swing to look like?
lowkey cant remember if the earlier source says a mace or an axe but yeah
well if he was actually wanting to kill the dude, not lazily swinging it
It's a lob sided object all mace swings look lazy unless you're like, swinging downward.
they dont look lazy, and yes, the fendente as said is the most powerful
I would imagine that his body would twist more
It looked like she only used his arms
Granted he was on horseback, so that may change some things
But if he was striking down, I would imagine one would use their obliques and abs to curl their body slightly down along with the strike to add some power
Granted I’m no expert on warfare from horseback
Have you ever used a mace, they're really not very fun to swing.
They're just not as fast as most other things
"And anone one of hem that was in mountaguys companye vp with a mace & smote the same hugh vpon the hede that the brayn brest out and fel on the grounde. and sodenly he was dede an euyll deth"
- William Caxton
"In this battle a French Captain turned to face me because I killed two of his brothers on the battlefield, and we fought in the middle of the two camps armed as men at arms with some iron maces that I brought out. The Frenchman, seeing the weight of them, threw his to the ground, being unable to wield it well, and seized hold of an estoc and lunged at me, thinking that I would not be able to wield the mace either. He stabbed me through the tasset and wounded me, and I then struck him on the armet with the mace and I sank it into his head, from which he fell down dead."
- Diego García de Paredes
"And the Lord King turned and seeing that this knight had killed Guillem Escriva, gave him such a blow of his mace on his iron cap that his brains came out at his ears, and he fell dead to the ground."
- Ramon Muntaner
dawg i can pick up a hammer right now and swing it with much more force lol
he is swinging lazily if you look at his arm
Yeah hammers are significantly easier to swing
brother...
what does "euyll" mean here?
evil
(not in a moral meaning, but like how we might say the temper of a sword was bad)
I know what swinging all these weapons is like from first hand experience, maces and hammers are not the same.
probably not his brain but just blood flowing from the ears
if u do then u suck lmao
So I somehow suck with maces but not hammers despite them being basically the same in your reality?
What sense does that make?
no ur just making shit up
You don't understand the physics behind a mace until you've swung one, sorry but that's just the way it is
That first one had me audibly go “ooooooooh”
yeah
theres some funny accounts of men at arms getting hit in the head and just lurching and u can feel it lol
"Another good bout happened there between a Frenchman and an Englishman, duelling on foot with battleaxes. The Frenchman went into the attack, raising his axe to strike; thinking that he had his foe close to him, he went so far short of the Englishman that, as mighty a blow as he thought he was giving him, so mightily he cast himself and the axe onto the ground, falling outstretched before his opponent’s feet. The latter, seeing him lying there, dealt him such an axe-blow that the Frenchman let out a huge moan. As there was not to be more than one blow at each encounter, he got up, and they did not go on to another."
- Fernao Lopes
"The French soon formed again, and shouted their cry of Notre Dame Ribemont! Many a man was unhorsed on both sides. The lord du Chin fought with a leaden mace, with which he smashed every helmet that came within reach of it; for he was a strong and lusty knight, well made in all his limbs: but he himself received such a blow on his casque that he reeled, and would have fallen to the ground had he not been supported by his squire. He suffered from this blow as long as he lived."
- Jean Froissart
leaden mace should be plommee in the original french iirc, so just a lead maul
@vocal vale bascinet I'm making, couldn't help myself and decided to try out my new bluing liquid on it in the middle of cleaning it up and sanding it.
That poor guy in the first one
neat !!!
Still quite rough rn but the hard work is all done
That looks awesome so far
Cheers love
Brigandines with lance rests
1- St Michael, Jaume Huguet, c. 1455-1460.
https://www.museunacional.cat/en/colleccio/saint-michael/jaume-huguet/037759-000
2- St Michael, From the retable in the Church of Santa María la Mayor, Alcañiz (Teruel). Attributed to the workshop of Domingo Ram, active 1462-96.
https://i.pinimg.com/1200x/44/49/f8/4449f8864498c1a2051b8c59395d54b4.jpg
Cool southern french brigs
1- Jacques Durandi, Retable de Saint Jean-Baptiste
vers 1450,
Tempera sur bois,
Musée des Beaux-Arts Jules Chéret, Nice
2- The retable of Saint Marguerite, by Jacopo Durandi (15th century)
Joan figuera, predella di san lucifero, post 1456, da s. lucifero a cagliari, michele arcangelo
Siracusa, Galleria Regionale di Palazzo Bellomo, Tombstone of Giovanni Cabastida (Joan Cabastida) from Syracuse Cathedral (Francesco Laurana attr., 1472)
Are you sure it's a brigandine and not a ciurass that looks like a brigandine? Because they certainly did that.
What does lusty mean in this context?
It is certainly a brigandine, the buckles on front are basically telltale of a brigandine
Healthy, strong
Ah, I see
though there are exceptions
but yeah certainly more buckles on a brigandine
one thing i am curious about with that gilt st michael one though - other brigandines without rivets on the outside? or perhaps is it not a brigandine 
also just noticed it looks like that solothurn fechtbutch guy has his bevor attached to his visor. personally never seen that before
except with one of maximilian's
Can someone please explain to me why the mace in this game does NO damage?
IRL knight armor was so op that swords were useless against them, and they quickly fell out of use(they were only used ceremonially because swords were extremely expensive and peasants weren’t allowed to wear them).
So instead, maces were the ultimate knight killing weapon since they could crush straight through the armor to injure the wearer. This pic for example shows what a mace blow could do to a chest plate:
Makes no sense at all that the ultimate knight killing weapon is so weak
oh no
fat tony is back
please do not post visored barbute or whatever fantasy thing
thats a shot from a cannon ball also thats a cuirass from the 19th century
No it's from a mace
was this mace in the form of a ball going 500 miles per hour
no it was a flanged mace
it merely grazed him
causing the knight wearing that 19th century cuirass to drop dead
^
We don't have a lot of cuirasses from the Renaissance period because maces just disintegrated them
No I think that was just Victorians
The medieval era stopped in 1400 because they had maces and annihilated knights in shiny armor
huh?
Tony this was from a cannon ball
That’s from the battle of Waterloo
That’s like what
300 ish years after half sword takes place
he's trolling
jokes aside that style of cuirass is fucking ugly
Yeah the rivets are off putting
its not just the rivets, its like
everything
its probably cause im more used to more globose shaped cuirasses but
Ain't even trolling
This is some legendary internet historian action going on here
Globose sounds like a slur for aliens
I just don't really see a lance rest being that good on a brigandine, they're to stop things like the lance being pushed backward on impact and stuff but I feel like that would surely fuck up the brigandine it's attached to
I'd be very very surprised if a brigandine could take that kind of strain. I can only image the segment that the lance rest is attached to would get torn out completely at the rivets.
did any black+gold armor exist?
Round.
Yeah ik what it means 😂
In renaissance absolutely, as for medieval idk. Blackened with brass bits is pretty close though
pic?
ur right doe
Fucking nice one dude
Most definetly, considering latten decoration was a thing, and blackening was absolutely a thing
We do have evidence it was done, though, not just in paintings:
I find it so funny everything around it is really bad and anachronistic and then there’s just a fairly accurate warhammer
Bec de corbin not warhammer
Isn’t it a Pollaxe
yea its just a variation of the pollaxe unless its meant as a one handed pick/hammer for cavalry use as far as i know
like "lucerne hammer" just a way of saying its a pollaxe with a hammer
most examples ive seen of lucerne hammers are pretty much exactly what people call bec de corbin
seems the terms are just used interchangeably
A certain weapon was uncovered at lucerne I believe, that being the lucerne hammer
It's always two handed
Warhammers are one handed
Maybe also two idk but bec de corbin is always a pollax
lucerne axe is a modern term describing a certain construction of pollaxe
crow beak is the less common term for falcon beak
it can mean either a short one:
"vng petit bec de faulcon A vne main pour vng cappne"
or long:
"Si luy furent deux haches baillées et livrées, qui furent longues et poisantes: et furent les maillets et testes desdictes haches à manière de becs de faucon..."
Anyone got accurate images of a Bastard Sword? And maybe also a way to describe it, because i dont know much about it.
I dont know if BS's even exist
its a real term, we dont know what the definition of it is supposed to be
the modern definition is probably wrong
Still talking about the Lucerne Axe or was that focused at my Bastard Sword question?
bastard sword
ah, thanks then!
theres also this armor i guess
again i dunno which year is if from or anythinf
does it even belong in this channel
ive seen people refer to warhammers with a beak on one side as a bec de corbin or ravens/crows beak before, i was talking more in that sense i was unaware if thats incorrect
Ravens beak was a colloquialism used to describe pollaxes that had a beak (cutting or hammer head didn't matter)
But the term pollaxe was used more anyway
Ravens beak was used to only describe the beak part and sometimes the whole weapon by extension. Colloquialism and shi y'know how it is
And bec de faucon (falcon's beak) was also more popularly used than bec de corbin (crow's beak) from what I could gather
Little meme I made
I am aware based on the belt that this is a 14th century harness but does anyone know about 15th century examples of full brigantine arm harnesses such as this?
Mine is pollaxe 😃
That's not brigandine
That's just textile covered armor
The besagew on it is amazing
Actually yeah now that I look it’s not really moving like brigantine
Very nice brass work
In all'antica scenes there's limb protections that do look like that (as an effort from 15thc artists to make it look like older armor)
There's also leather and rope arm defenses from a tourney treaty (livre des tournois du roi René) that look similar
Ok thanks
gotcha, thank you for breaking it down like that thats a lot easier to understand lol
Silly idea
You may be in war but you still need swag
imagine beggar boss willie with this 😭 i love him so much
iirc it does seem that colloquially the falcon beaks etc. were seen as being the ones with hammers and not axes
at least when it is describing a weapon and not the part of the axe
lets go gambling
Can I get something that isn't an axe? (joking)
so just to recap and make sure im understanding correctly; bec de corbin/bec de faucon is just a pollaxe with a beak on one end whether or not it has a hammer bit doesn't matter, lucerne hammer/axe is a bec de corbin/faucon, but lucerne hammer/axe is a more modern term and usually only refers to a pollaxe with a beak and hammer, crows/ravens beak is the specific term for the beak bit. its all pollaxe.
have i got it right or no bc i feel like im losing my mind
"Lucerne hammers" = two handed hammer (pollaxe) that happen to have bee made in Lucerne
But like fodder said, most likely a modern term
Bec de faucon (and more rarely bec de corbin) refers primarily to the beak of a pollaxe itself, although they colloquialy were used to describe the entire pollaxe when featured
Question to reenactors: how do you know how high up to tie your cuisses? Is there a good way to check?
I would love if you could switch to the beak side and punch a hole in armour if you put enough force into it
you will not be punching into armor that often at all
Being able to switch sides on pollaxes would be nice
well maybe at the least less well kempt armour like armour from the militia and soldier tiers
It would need to be mild steel and likely a relatively thin area
The bec de corbin probably was one of if not the best weapon at penetrating plate armour, that doesn't mean it was good at doing it though.
1- Altarpiece of the Constable of the chapel of Santa Ágata, Barcelona (1464-1465)
2- Saint Vincent at the Stake, Jaume Huguet, Part of the altarpiece of the church of Sant Vicenç de Sarrià. (c. 1455-1460)
3- Saint Michael, Master of Belmonte (Spanish, Aragon, active ca. 1460–90)
4- Resurrection of Christ, Master of Xàtiva (c. 1500)
5- Magdalene with Saint Michael, Anonymous Xàtiva Altarpiece (late 15th century)
cool fluted visor, photo taken by Roel Renmans
front view of the harness
Is this type of armet too early for the game? I really like the rondels on it.
simply me, chiling by the fire with my halberd
is that a halberd? i thought it would need at least a hook to count as a halberd
it's a halberd
so a halberd doesnt need a hook to be a halberd?
yup
my world has been torn apart
so, beforehand i wouldve thought only the 3rd image was a halberd
and a halberd without a hook is god knows what
habred
nice, very smooth
Anything with a piece of metal at the end is a halberd these days.
me no like
i would prefer if each little change made the weapon have a different title
it's still time, say no to halberds and join the vougecels
join us
Halberds are better, thats why i dont want icky Voulges to be similar to them
🖕
;P
Sick as hell
Schongauer Spießknecht der mittleren Bürgerschicht ⚔️🛡️
.
Pictures by 📷 @bsf.de
.
#kriegsknecht #15thcentury #latemedieval
Pavise spearman is real
Pics for ppl who dont use instagram
Which manuscript is this?
Luzerner Chronik (1513) by Diebold Schilling
Huh... Is it the fact it is from 1513 make it less valid or trustworthy of a source?
it's depicting the siege of a milanese city by the swiss in 1478. equipment looks like it could easily fit into that date range.
||my opinion: chronicle illustrations, at least around the turn of the 16th century, have limited visual vocabularies (types for soldiers, nobles, etc.) that usually reflect either contemporary fashion imposed onto some older period or some equally generalized appearance for the sake of expedience / also just reflect the various artists own repetitive visual 'languages,' so important events or features are highlighted without too much regard for the accuracy of every detail.||
I see
@prisma raven What hat is this?
Helmet rondels are my favorite rondels. I'd love to see more than just sallets with rondels for HS
I don't really know if it has a distinctive name tbh
in spanish it's called a "bonete"
I usually see described it as "acorn hat".
Cool
I customized them :D
feel like that armet really does not match the rest of the kit
Why is references in a different category now
not rlly related to the game but its the same time window
does anyone know what the purpose of the knot at the nape is?
Looks cool
We frequently discuss topics outside the game's specific scope like burgher fashion. Don't worry about it.
it's a nape knot. a knot for the nape
1464-1467 Flanders - Histoires de Troyes, KBR ms. 9263
that helmet decoration(?) sticking out from the back of the sallet is so odd. looks cool though
arbites
medieval Judge Dredd
Biggest helmet rondel I've seen yet
I believe these armours are form the 16th century but seeing as they have great bassinets I was curious, at the time of this game did anyone wear great bascients or did they go out of fashion to early and come back to late to be featured
they're from the late 15thc
actually uh
wait i have to check something
Oh, did they have those bear feeted sabatons then?
I thought late sabatons were still pointed
so right at the end years of the 15thc
tabards, idk name of thats thing😭
i think theyre tabards but theyre referred to as livery in most of the stuff i see them in
bear feeted sabatons look very cool
BURGUNDY REFERENCE
I thought livery is a more general term to encompass tabards, surcoats, etc
This guide is generally good for contemporary terminology.
oh yeah, i searched this pic
ty for image!
well i usually see it when its referencing these 2 types of thingamabobs
I see livery is to tabards and surcoats, as clothes is to t-shirts and button down shirts
But that's my perception
but i'd assume they just use it to group the heraldric devices together
probably yeah
A livery is an identifying design, such as a uniform, ornament, symbol, or insignia that designates ownership or affiliation, often found on an individual or vehicle. Livery often includes elements of the heraldry relating to the individual or corporate body featured in the livery. Alternatively, some kind of a personal emblem or badge, or a di...
So, literally an identifying design. Makes sense when you got to uniform people in different types of equipment. I'd assume a Burgundian cross across a gambeson would count as a livery for example
Early progress of Milan ciurass I'm making. Lots of dents and welds everywhere because I'm going by the philosophy of make it exist and functioning before you spend hours making it nice and good.
I love the dents
It's like a raw Turkish style jazz cymbal
They're mostly there because the front piece is a breastplate someone sold me that I've heavily modified, unfortunately the steel on it is quite thin so welding it just puts holes through it. Not good since I had to take a chunk out of it and then weld it back up to get it into the correct shape
dueling shield
3rd one looks like a goddamn double bass
i know what my next drawing will be
i might just draw over one of those drawings
Anyone got more cool paintings of Dueling shield duels?
most of those don't fit this channel's scope I think
Looks more early modern than 15th century except the double bass one
Look up Hungarian shields
i know those
i guess ill ask in the other channel, because i only want those cool duelling shields
Iberia
not iberian made...
Joe made
New dequitem video came out
Swords are way better and penetrating mail than I thought
Fig. 92
🤣 🤣
by any chance have you read anything about these were thought to be made or do you have your own assessment how the rivets aren't visible?
like is it just like regular brigandines but with that exterior layer of high quality fabric overthe riveted layer and with the buckles still slit through
Kinda depends on the type of maile they're wearing.
This isn't even riveted and you've got absolutely no chance of doing anything through it with a sword or dagger.
I'm not even sure a warhammer could but I'm going to try that when mine arrives.
I believe there were some maille geometry that were noted to stop some crossbow bolts
I think I saw that mention in an Italian text about light cavalrymen
The maile I'm holding in my hand I fully believe could probably do that.
Hell the tests I did against that maile were against a solid surface where the maile couldn't deform much, so I imagine it would be even better on a person.
The capacity for good mobility with maile like that I'm honestly not sure though, it moves completely free on one axis but is rather stiff along the perpendicular axis, Ill have to find out once I sew it on my doublet
I would have thought good maile would be surprisingly good against guns tbh, given it can deform and absorb
There was a stupid video a while ago of some gun nut testing modern firearms against "armour", it was aluminum costume armour and yet if I remember correctly the aluminium maile somehow cought a 22 gague slug
Could be remembering wrong
Also it would still turn whoever is wearing it to mush anyway so it doesn't matter 😂
Yeah but ..
ONE mace hit..
and he's DONE FOR
Well yeah even the plate armour he had you could probably cave it in with a good punch
Also I reckon there's a hidden advantage to being a human when it comes to firearms. I'm not sure how relevant this could ever be but if you imagine tank armour, tanks are very very difficult to move, humans and their limbs are very easy to move. Thing is that bullets are far far more effective against surfaces that don't move when impacted.
Idk lol
it was a jonke sorry
I thought it might be but also that armour I mentioned definitely would have caved from a mace so actually not even a joke in that case
What is this text from
Date of access?
Huh?
Nvm I'll just estimate