#references♥_1450-1470
1 messages · Page 31 of 1
Yh they prevent it from rusting
does anybody know the difference between besagews and rondels for armpit protection?
I might be wrong, but from what I’ve been able to piece together rondels are any disc that is lightly dished and is attached anywhere for protection. Besagews can be rondels, but they specifically protect the armpit
There are loads of sources of at least early XV century English ones being shapes other than rondels when it comes to besagews
Once again, take this with a grain of salt, it’s quite possible I am 100% wrong
i see thank you for this information
Ur good, that’s correct
And thanks for the info
Caesar’s soldiers depicted as Burgundians on the 2nd of the four 'Caesar' tapestries, c.1470
Tournai, Southern Netherlands (Belgium)
Bern Historical Museum
3rd tapestry
the guy shortening his sword is cool
?
Might be wrong. But I’m pretty sure this is outside the range of 1450-1470
ye his hoqueton is neat
detail of the archers
an even cooler hoqueton
Painted sallet? Coooool
Probs fabric
Someone should totally just drop a whole bunch of drippy plate armor rq
Just a thought 🙏
My plate legs. I bought steel sheets online and these will be the first piece of my suit that I'm going to alter since I want the cuisses before July.
The top articulated piece of metal on each leg is either going to be cut down or removed, and then replaced with the thigh section which I'll hammer out of steel, hinge, and then strap.
The poleyns (knees) were given to me for free and the greaves I bought online since the greaves I was given alongside the knees were so bad I didn't even attempt to do anything with them.
Currently the greaves and knees are riveted together due to the fact that I wear padding under them which would make them not work properly together if I attached them the proper way.
Modern rivets were used in many places as I don't currently have any means to do them properly.
One issue I need to fix is I attached the strap for the bottom of the knee section before I attached the greaves so the lesther is actually Inbetween the two sections, holding them apart near the edges.
(I'm basing them on the Fitzherbert effigy in Norbury).
nice
could be, is likely covered though
I don’t think there is much, if any, evidence for painted armor in the 15th century
other than it used to be in fashion centuries earlier, as it is depicted frequently in the 13th century
appears to be painted rather than covered
who knows if even that is an artistic device to make the manuscript colorful, as maille is often shown colored as well and it is far less likely that they were going around painting maille lol
it does look that way, idk
It’s certainly not impossible
For example here it appears to be covered rather than painted
la velvet
also just noticed the guy off to the left has a bevor with breathing perforations
pretty neat, idk how common that is
its semi fantasy armor anyways
and certainly not detailed enough to tell if the artist wanted it to be interpreted as painted or covered
painting armor doesnt seem to be very common in the 15th century though i must say
doesn’t seem to be done at all, most extants i’ve seen were just painted later
though maybe there are written sources or art i’m not aware of, i’ve not seen any evidence for it when it comes to that either
covering seems to be more practical anyways, as in it would prevent rain/whatever from damaging the armor itself
Other than fashion
Also it seems it would be much more annoying to replace damaged paint than like a velvet or silk covering. No need to have an artist repaint your shit when it gets chipped if you just use a textile
painting was done in the mid 14th century and prior and in the 16th century. seems to fall in and out of fashion. the 15th century was probably the "out of fashion" period.
I don’t know if this is the right channel to ask this, but I’ve seen a lot of these terms refer to similar things with little explanation as to why, what is the difference between a Tonlet, Faulds, and a Paunce of plates.
- tonlet
- fauld
- paunce
I can very clearly see the difference between the tonlet and the others, but what’s different between the fauld and the Paunce. I know faulds are usually worn attached to a Plackart, is the only difference that paunces can be worn independently?
fauld refers to maille
do you mean a "culet"?
- fauld
Culet is the back portion of the faulds
of the paunce of plates
It's the same name for both
no, it's not
Culet protects your cul (ass)
do you mean culet or fauld and paunce
It's literally in the name
im confused
The culet is the back portion of the skirt of plates
chyeah
If I'm right they also call whatever assembly that covers your midsection (paunce, faulds, etc) braconnière
for a tonlet and paunce of plates, there is no difference
same thing
faulds refers to a maille ‘skirt’
those 16th century doohickeys are just really big tonlets/paunces of plates
my source btw
https://www.instagram.com/reel/DJlvCsQMT-t/?igsh=czdoM2txYjE3M2I0 cool italian sallet he’s wearing
The duels between light infantry carried out together with the friends of @maglidacciaio have few simple rules:
- You fight to the best of 3 points.
- The touches are only valid if inflicted by cutting (in the case of a sword) on any area uncovered by plates or mail.
- The touches of the tip are also valid on the mail.
- Since you fight...
underarm
😔
at least theyre not holding their spears like 1/4 from the heel though lol
overarm just seems like it’d be genuinely better for planting and driving the point into mail as well as getting around the shield (me thinks)
overarm has the capability to be literally twice as powerful than underarm, although underarm can also be useful for more reach or allowing you to grip it with two hands more quickly when you wish. i will say it is funny that marozzo portrays the underarm technique to be the more unorthodox method.
overarm is also better for more close quarters fighting
and you can throw it
ah okay i figured as much
holy based??? need to see artistic depiction of this NOW !!!
🙀🙀🙀
for knives but it proves that biomechanically it is just more powerful
Why is Gloucestershire police a test group?
Male, female, and Gloucestershire police
different species
yeah 😏
114.9 j fucking hell😭
yeah lmao
finally all REAL genders listen
Male, Female, RMCS and Gloucestershire Police
truth nuke…
add ian laspina
retired war veteran after the 30 years war
overarm also lets you stab downwards with gravity in addition to better overall biomechanics
to get the same amount of force with an underarm stab you have to bring your second hand in to drive the pommel
has anyone ever seen a cuirass where the backplates are attached by a belt/strap like a lot of 15th century breastplates and placards?
Was this kind of dancing practiced in the 15th century?
blurry
blurry but peak
Very romantic.
No that look like absolute ass
Is it just me, or are those tassets exceptionally long
wat da flip
i wish to see willie wear this
valid
I mean- upside, your kicks now act like a sharp object, downside, heels in dirt.

Name: Histoire tripartite or Chronique de Baudouin d'Avennes
Source: Royal 18.E.V.
Dating: 1473 to 1479
nice ms
Royal MS 14 E II
Dating: 1473-1483
neat
That is just a cheap LARPy reproduction from Armstreet. They, as a rule, should be avoided for anything regarding armor that isn't for LARP: Instead, I suggest looking into forums like myarmoury, the armour archive, or lurk a little here first
Why the long stick to hold the sallet on the third picture?
I think it boils down to Armstreet being, well, Armstreet.
Just a neat/novel way to show a servant or page holding the helmet of who theyre serving i think - same motif appears in a Vengeance of Our Lord tapestry showing a servant holding vespasian's helmet on a stick just like that
Oh, that is indeed neat! I assume this would be used specially for those who decide to go mounted on cavalry rather than on foot
True id never thought of the stick as giving superior elevation so the rider can take their helmet but that makes sense lol
Pisanello and Breughel both have designs of young men wearing their masters helmets and in Schwarz's Trachterbuch theres an illustration of his page holding his helmet too
Do any of you hooligans have any good references for Awlpikes, or are those out of period
Thank you, that is beautiful
I think they would be funny for an April's Fools joke
for april fools lets spam armstreet

the humble awlpike
I was using it as an example for the mobility/weak spots of armor in real life (the armpits and elbows)
Which would be covered with maille
maille voiders type shit
or flancards
and shit
or uncommonly compression voiders
That is still a poor choice, it is a low grade reproduction. For that, I suggest selecting manuscripts where the armpits are exposed, the arms are in different poses, or something like Tahlhoffer's fencing manual (I most likely butchered the spelling of his name, but you know): Few things are better for figuring out armor mobility and weak spots than a book that depicts how to fight in it, against it, and the stances to take
I feel, even Paulus Hector Mair is better for that than Armstreet, as while Paulus Hevtor Mair's book is way out of period, it was made by a fencing master from the late 16th century copying older manuscripts
wrong channel fella
I'm starting to agree with Kevlar about people not being able to read channel names

Indeed, wrong channel-
oh sorry
I think Kevlar is a bit too harsh with it, specially when people post armor from a different time period, but eh
No worries, game-footage is prob where you would want to post it
A German chronicle dated 1468, I couldn't find the name but if anyone knows let me know
Here is what I was talking about, for example, which shows what Bull was looking for (armor mobility and weak spots), and fits just in the time frame (1459), all taken from Talhoffer's personal manuscript, no need for any Armstreet pieces:
Huh, why does the second last image have a relatively tall individual compared to a smaller one?
It depicts David's fight with Goliath
You can see the names in the text above
I didn't need to show this detail, but I just wanted to make it clearer
@robust tendon
Oh- Yeah, that makes sense, also explains why the smaller dude is using a rock rather than a weapon proper
Again, terrible example
That is a depressing bevor
Getting closer, but not quite there still: You can probably get some more resources by looking into specific dates, say, art that shows armor that was drawn between 1450 and 1475. If you know what to look for, you can find really nice stuff
Like the Pastrana Tapestries
@robust tendon what is it depicting
pollaxe head filled with toxic powder
he gives you the recipe
should we
he says no

that's wild 
Do you have more photos like this to help with painting? I'm trying to draw as a beginner
I was trying to give a guy a simple armor picture to show that joints are the weak spots
bevor
Hm, fair, in that case, the fencing manuals are a good resource, like Talhoffer's personal manuscript, which I will link (along with all of the manuals Talhoffel wrote and drew) here: https://wiktenauer.com/wiki/Hans_Talhoffer
Hans Talhoffer (Dalhover, Talhofer, Talhouer, Thalhoffer; fl. 1433-67) was a 15th century German fencing master. His martial lineage is unknown, but his writings make it clear that he had some connection to the tradition of Johannes Liechtenauer, the grand master of the German school of fencing. Talhoffer was a well educated man, who took intere...
Do make sure that, whatever you post in this channel, fits in the time frame between 1450-1470, give or take about 5 years, and do make sure it is a good-quality reproduction or it is a drawing from the time period (as in, drawn in 1460, not drawn to represent something of 1460)
why do we need an image to say that "the weak spots are the gaps"
Well, just so that people don't figure that the thickest sections of the armor are the weakest points, because that'd be terrible!
...Good point
from here
depicting a 14th century battle but it's a miniature that fits into the game's timeframe
Or wait
Are those glaives just depicted thin or on an angle 
I cant tell and see glaives in the other miniatures
pink armor
getting rep 80 in the 15th century must be hella rough
theyre like a normal 15th century vouge
You know, Halfswords team should add an IRL armor chatroom, that would be sick.
Hey, isn’t this in Mordhau?
No clue, never played Mordhau
You should…
can't believe they turned mordhau crude rework into a real thing!
and the gauntlets might be based on this, but it's too early for the game
feel free
They are, yeah.
Does something distinguish these and the ones in the game?
The plate going over the fingers seems larger, is that it? Something like that?
Thank you very much!!!
I am going to throw you
I... no comment.
Is there something I don’t know?
I hate that you took the time to model the hook to hold the bevor in place
You didn’t just assault us with an abomination
You assaulted us with an abomination you put work into
It completely flies in the face of anything regarding armor of the 15th Century
It’s not even representing an XV century helmet
what does it mean

Lovely helm
Landshuter Ratsherr im Harnisch 😀💍📿
.
#landshut #langschwert #longsword #history #reenactment #livinghistory #bayern #bavaria #1475 #15thcenturyfashion #15thcenturyreenactment #15thcenturyarmor #15centuryart #15thcentury #latemedieval #spätmittelalter #mittelalterreenactment #mittelalter #medieval #medievalreenactment
What is the name of this cool coat?
i think for german most garments going over armour can be called a Wappenrock (or that one pictured in particular could be a Rock by itself as Schwarz often calls similar coats). Schecke is related to english 'jacket' too so it makes sense to call it that. so either is fine but they're both the modern german terms that have more precise older words. that one has the Leerärmel or literally empty sleeves with the slit in them
Thank you for the info!
all good it is something i am keenly interested in
Im interested in clothings that a 15th cent. knight could wear over his harness :]
wappenrock = arming frock, literally "coat of arms" 😏
nice tailoring
Holy shit that is a GOOD kit
It almost looks like, I am not sure how to describe it, like someone photoshopped it? For lack of a better term?
It's crazy good
In the clerge, we all fam 😎
my favorite part about two distinct historical instances of 15th century germans laying ambushes in religious dress is that's how Reinold and Malegis trick Charlemagne into giving them back Bayard in the Vier Aymonskinder
Can you share some photos that can be a reference for me for drawing? Like this one
What’s the source for this?
thanks man ❤️
?? Some of the soruces are there
Yeah. Just saw that, lol
Like right as I asked that, sorry.
I meant the actual journal, though, not where they got the kit information
Here are the original posts
https://x.com/Eol4242/status/1889727752699343333
https://x.com/Eol4242/status/1890096180530757829
https://x.com/Eol4242/status/1876662866264420720
https://x.com/Eol4242/status/1815814777526182176
https://x.com/Eol4242/status/1653764675253805059
https://x.com/Eol4242/status/1458857239079436297
https://x.com/Eol4242/status/1394356067425980419
Thanks boss
are these said mal engines are real thing? if so that is fascinating
I LOVE IT!
How do doublets keep that perfect shape in the torso? Do they have structure built in somehow?
was thinking about spikes when i saw this spiky fella
maybe it's just fantasy in this case to make him seem more malignant beside christ though
I do also wish to know that, as currently I am trying to make the patterns for my own arming doublet (or tried to, anyway
The waist is definetly squeezed, and maybe the chest is exagerated a little
But what makes the chest be squeezed? No clue, honestly
i know that this img might be a lil early for the game setting, but does the polearm the men at arms using based on a real example ?
There's a mal engine in that poleaxe btw
is that david and big dude
goliaf
Goliath
goliaf
goloia
it’s a mal engine and yes stuff like that was used
i suppose it could also be a fantasy-ism, since mal engines were very much frowned upon and in the context of the bible, Goliath is not ‘good’
Soo theres no real example of such polearm ?
i’m not aware of any extants but we know these sorts of things were real
hmm interesting, it would be cool if this weapon be added as a boss weapon
evil >:3
Willie engine
Was the billhook-like butt spike in some of the pollaxes from the game considered mal engines?
its a fantasy-ism to portray an older time period
its an entirely plausible weapon, but probably not intended to be one
probably not, but i'm not sure
Super late reply, but you can do that too. No idea if the 15th Century europeans knew about it, but most likely at least 16th Century Iberian Peninsula did.
LANTERN SHIELDS! they were made during the 15th and 16th century
this isnt within the time frame of the game
literally the armor behind it is like not medieval
I mean have you been to a museum before they sometimes throw all sorts of armour around lol
big lie uh oh!
I didn’t know 🙃 aight ill not post stuff then
pls post more stuff
wepon
grug feel refined enough to be tourneymaxxin
kolbenturnier maxxing
GYAAATTT What a fine maiden
add old people
Sallet by Francois L'Archeveque. He said there are sallets like this at Musée de l'Armée in Paris and at the Castelnaud Castle.
Look similar to the one we have in the game rn 😄
thats crecey
Lobter
Ooo- which region is the harness from?
fluted greaves coming in 3040
This was probably requested a few times, but: flails, military flails were used in 632-1540s, this is a painting of the battle of Nineveh, painted in 1452. This painting here shows a 3 ball flail
Flails saw uses in Germany, France, and Britian.
The painting with the yellow clothed man is of a painting of in 1520s, a lot earlier but it's to show the time frame of these weapons existence
In terms of sallets is this one worth my time accuracy wise? https://www.wulflund.com/german-sallet-ca-1480-medieval-helmet
no
what would be the best place to get a good fixed visor sallet?
A smith
ok
there are some good smiths like Maks Izobov, Robert Macpherson, Roman Tereschenko, and Piotr Feret that you may want to look into if you're actually interested
https://platener.eu/helmy_en.html piotr's website
thank you so much
do keep in mind that high-quality smiths are very expensive
and you may have to wait a while
though ofc varies by what you want
that makes sense I am not in a position to buy at the moment I was just basically online window shopping
Honestly don't think a sallet like that would be crazy expensive
that is goood news to hear
depends on the smith ofc they have different prices and all but the shape and construction is quite simple all things considered
thank you all for the info
yeah, not cheap though i don't think
i've seen some people say a good skullcap could run like 200 US
skull
i love me some skullcaps
True History Shop, if you're based in Europe. He made outstanding, battle ready equipment
Armor and helmet made by him. Spring steel, ligh and hard as rock. He make also a lot of stuff from 1300 to 1500
Thats the guy from kcd
he still ship to the states?
What you mean with kcd? Anyway is me in the pic
I think yes, but with Trump's tariffs not really sure about it
Ahhh ok I see. Yeah my kit is for a 11th century Rus so cuman influences are definetly there, even if I'm more on the Miklagard (Byzantium) side about my equipment (the klibanion mostly, but I also have a nasal helmet that fit quite well with any Byzantine equipment)
i was debating buying the churburg s18 armet from him
As I said, he is a really good smith, and his stuff are definetly battle ready. Only thing is I don't actually know why you need it, if for full contact sport like Buhurt or reenactment with no heavy fighting. If no Buhurt, I would stick on something cheaper, otherwise he is a really good choose, as well Sharukan Marker or Buhurt Tech, not sure that they have those kind of helmet tough
harnischfechten
Ok but full contact or technical? I suppose the first?
Yeah so definetly he is good for that. Check also Buhurt tech and Sharukan market 😉
The Phil. Museum visored sallet from that store is also really good, or at least looks like so to me
I feel quite hungry
me when ive never played the game
No I live in texas
This miniature is actually meant to represent the battle of Hattin, however in general the armaments reflect the era it was made in (the 15th century)
Can I sleep over
And wake up next to you?
I want to feel you near
Just let me whisper in your ear
Sorry, meant throwable spears
does hre men at arms use tabards in the 15th century ?
may i ask you, on what manuscript did you find this iconography ?
yes
is there any iconography that depict it ?
I assume that if they wore anything with heraldry on it over their armour it would probably have the heraldry of the polity that they were from in the empire
the description of the empire-wide army mustered for the siege of neuss suggests that the groups from each region represented themselves as being from those regions and not wearing all black and gold with big double headed eagles on their clothes if that's what you mean
ah thank you lad, anyways is there any og source on the iconography ?
from 1974 Richard Vaughan - Charles the Bold The Last Valois Duke of Burgundy
oh sorry you mean like deeper primary sources. probably I'm sure but I haven't really dug into 15th century stuff. only primary source off the top of my head is a very late 15th century decree by Maximilian that all knights of the Order of St George are to wear a white gown over there armour with the order's arms on it.
that Vaughan excerpt cites primary sources though (chronicles) so it's pretty good
yes, thankyou for your help lad
really needed it for smth
#killallburgundians
Just got my new breastplate and figured maybe it can help as a reference. It's a reproduction of this ca 1470-80s alla tedesca piece from the Carsten Klingbeil collection: https://www.flickr.com/photos/roelipilami/6521301255/in/photostream/
The original has been altered in the 16th century (possibly even later), so the armourer Rasmus Rasmussen and I workshopped making a repro of what it might have looked like in its original late 15th century state. Master armourer Albert Collins also gave some advice through the process.
has this been "cleaned up" with AI?
Idk, I did sharpen it originally but I also found a clearer copy and I don't know which is which
@west pasture
this is the original, the sharpening process loses detail so I think it's unadvisable to do it to a historical source
e.g. in the original you can see the breaths on the armet of the king, in the cleaned up version you can't
Sorry, I just had it in my library so I put it here
Mb
all good 🙂
Getting closer to my desired look. I'd be wearing an arm harness and a leg harness in the image but both of them are dismantled right now.
the cake is a lie!
A cavalry breast-plate "alla tedesca", Italian, possibly Brescia, circa 1470. Constructed in two parts, the upper plate globose and with outward turns at the neck and arms, the turned flanges hammered in an indented pattern, the lower plate moving on a single central sliding rivet and on a pair of internal leathers at the sides, the lower plate ...
An infantry breast-plate "alla tedesca", Northern Italy, circa 1470-80. Of globose form with a low medial ridge over its full length, constructed in two parts, the upper plate with a inward turned very narrow flange at the neck, fitted with movable arm-gussets, the right with an inward turned angular flange and the left turned outwards, the lowe...
why does this one has 2 rivets on the plackart?
anybody know where i can find some flemish stuff
In the place where the Flemish stuff is
What manuscript are these guys from?
Probably in Flanders
It's possibly a later addition
Bayerische Fürstengenealogie - Mscr.Dresd.P.47
Füetrer, Ulrich: Bayerische Fürstengenealogie - Mscr.Dresd.P.47, [S.l.] 16. Jh.
oh poop this is from the start of 16th century, I'm spreading disinformation 🥀
sorry y'all
Swiss Degen
a Swiss Sword (its just a longer swiss dagger)
was a Swiss weapon that saw use by the Swiss Confederacy as a sort of sidearm, while this sword is on the shorter end of other arming swords, it was reported to be able to do fairly well against the Messer.
Speaking of the Kriegsmesser: the Kriegsmesser was a two-handed curved tipped sword, the sword was actually used in LATE 15th century. so in half sword timeline, this sword would actually be used by military.
(the painting is of the Swiss Degen, you can see the shortsword around the waist of soldiers and a replica of the swiss degen. the other picture which is behind a case, located a museum in Vienna, this was a military variant of the short Messer dagger, which was actually longer.)
Swiss Kriegsmesser mensioned!!! I used a long Swiss Kriegsmesser as my inspiration for my OC 1h/2h sword. :D
might be a bit too long, my variant is 140cm grip included
this looks like one of the kriegmessers made by pavel moc!
most likely the inspiration i used, didnt know who made it though!
I have a repro of that degen too
Bought from ArmaBohemia
Original in Historisches Museum, Bern, Switzerland
I have one too so that is why I immediately recognized it.
im jealous
he is selling a batch of swords soon if its within your budget to buy a sword its 100% worth it.
Yeah, I've thought about having just randomly sized rocks and pebbles, beat off willies more effectively in broke boi tier
yes and maby, just maby, a 1 in 20 chance the rock is sharp
Caveman me like, remind me of genocide.
rhymes with Grug.
I am trying to draw these two armets that fit within the time frame of Half Sword, and I find this odd protusion coming out of the side of the armet: What is it? What was it used for?
What? The chin overlap?
Thats the thing that allows tge thing to close around the head
No, the bar-like or rod-like object on the visor
Thats to open and close it
just a handle for the visor
It's for lifting it
Cause u have gaunlets
That makes sense, but wouldn't the pointed shape of the visor already help lifting it?
Dude, mittens totally limit your dexterity lol
no man once u stick plates on there it becomes super flexible
i watched a tiktok short on this
u might have something in ur hands
like the lance, or the sword
i forget the duel, but one guy got his visor thrown open, and he closed it with the pommel of his sword
Do you have snow where you live?
i was being funny
That's actually kinda badass ngl
This does open the question: Why don't sallets have similar visor handles?
Why does it seem to be a mostly armet-only thing? (as far as I have seen from my archives)
probably not required in the first place
as with many things
also i forgot
this is the main thing
I'd guess because of the gap between the bevor and visor, making it easier to grab
That too could explain it
you wouldnt be able to lift it without the bar
The wrapper plate? Oh yeah- that explains it very well without opening up questions about why it is an armet-only thing
That makes a lot of sense
Yeah, that is probably it: A visor handle to use when you are wearing the wrapper
yeah cant find it. i do remember reading it though so im not just making it up
it was said everyone thought he was losing cuz his opponent was able to throw open his visor
but then he just threw it back down and continued
: Pontus und Sidonia; Universitätsbibliothek Heidelberg
pink castle
that's rad
would be more rad if i found it again 😔
I know of one sallet with a decorated stud to help with the visor but its a closed sallet and its this one
I remember seeing it before, but didn't saw the visor "handle"
maybe a few "owl face" sallets have some kind of bar like the armet but I cant find any right now. in general sallets didnt need the bar because of the construction of sallets, you can simply tilt the helmet back like this.
keep in mind that both of these helmets were popular around 1490
paint on those sallets is also ahistorical afaik
these helmets, so called black sallets, were covered
Christopher Retsch thinks potentially painted or covered in fabric which I think is fair
from a lot of images it's not exactly possible to distinguish
covering seems more practical
and there are extants with holes to attach a textile covering
some examples of such extants (painted later lol)
i do agree that, for art, it's impossible to distinguish exactly but a lot of the evidence does seem to point to these sallets being covered more often, if not always, than they were painted
also i'd think it's way easier to replace a textile covering as opposed to paint getting chipped or damaged
It
's all very circumstantial so I see no point in closing possibilities
in a 1555 inventory of the innsbruck armoury, there are two pieces of armour listed as being painted too, but these are the only primary source references I've ever found and they're of a chamfron and potentially a cuirass and not a sallet
second one may not even be referencing the cuirass itself tbh
well yeah in the 16th century painting armor seems to come back into fashion after falling out of it during the 15th
did they still even use 'black sallets' in the mid 16th? idk
maximilian's triumphal procession as several rows of them wearing sallets of that shape
what even is a black sallet?
these
“The simplest way to finish a piece was to not finish it at all, an option for low-quality armour produced in large quantities for common soldiers. This finish would be taken to the planishing stage but rarely any further, even the planishing being cursory and only smoothing out the worst ridges. Some very simple filing could also be carried out. IV.13 is an excellent example of a ‘black’ sallet with its rough surface which is so lightly planished that the raising marks can still be seen.”
this another extant?
oh wow, very cool, ty
it really seems like they were covered always, given that all extants I have seen have holes with which to attach textile
royal armouries 1490
IV.13 [pages 174–177; figures 44, 174–178] in Nickolas Dupras, “Armourers and their Workshops: The Tools and Techniques of Late Medieval Armour Production,” PhD Thesis,
i mean yeah it's possible they also painted these but there's just no evidence to support that afaik
while there's much to support the idea they just covered em
i wonder howm ant helmets nad what not are lost to history
Bazillions
I guess you're right. to be honest the holes along the border really are a smoking gun for fabric rather than paint. would love to know if it was demented restoration or something more authentic like by the descendants of the original owners for why the royal armouries one is painted though
like I lean towards fabric covering because I think it looks better and is probably way more dignified if it's functioning as a kind of uniform than a layer of paint. the infamous modern painted ones are kitschy and gross. but I don't like to be convicted either :/
Painting takes off again by 1530
Pre 1400 (specifically mid 14th c. and before) painting helmets was practiced. Goes in and out of fashion
15th c. was squarely in the "out of fashion" period
Notice how none of the patterns that show up on virtually all of these painted black sallets show up in art
I think at least some of them had their painting done during the mid 16th c., since around that time older armor was being repurposed for parades
But after their service life
Yeah I get that the ones with the heraldic patterns never show up in art, but personally, I wouldn't want to be closed to the possibility that e.g. helmets in this painting may be represented as lined with fabric or painted. although I agree that extant helmets with the fabric lining holes and the comparable crudeness of covering them in a layer of paint is good evidence against that possibility
Problem is we have quite literally no evidence for painting helmets in the period for when they were in use
The fact that the painting patterns are so consistent, yet we NEVER see them in art obviously should raise eyebrows
Even 40 years later, I'm pretty sure the military men painting their armor were mostly French and Italian (and were painting them black and with pictures over)
Yes, "could they" have painted? Sure. Maybe they did, but when we have no evidence for it, but more evidence to the contrary; and the fact that the helmets with the same painting designs also all have liner holes... (And I mean it's not the fact they have liner holes, but it's the pattern itself showing up on helmets with liner holes, which probably means the design itself was not contemporary to the helmet)
I guess people like Retsch are open to the possibility that images of coloured sallets may be representing either covered or painted helmets. not based on the ugly later painted Royal Armouries and KHM ones with their patterns. I think the liner holes are good evidence against painting though. but I just like to be a fallibilist - could always be wrong, especially with history being so patchy and incomplete
Yes and it's because it's patchy and incomplete that we must look at all the sources; and the written sources are nonexistent or near nonexistent for the late 15th c.; yet not nonexistent for the 16th or 14th. You cannot prove a negative, but we have a shitload of written documents regarding fabric covered armor.
It's like saying every single soldier carried a mace to fight armored opponents or some shit. Sure, they could have, but the evidence we DO have doesn't support it.
And by nature, we ought to look at the things we have and not the things we don't.
I'm not trying to prove anything except point out that I agree with Retsch that images of coloured sallets may be representing either fabric covered or painted helmets. I dont think it's proof I'm just personally not closed to the possibility ¯_(ツ)_/¯
my thought process as well, authenticity shouldn't be based on the simple possibility of something, and instead based on what you have actual evidence for
there's just zero evidence for painted 'black sallets' so it's a safe bet to assume they were contemporarily just covered
It's just poor academic methodology to make up a solution for something we already have evidence for (in this case, fabric coverings). Until someone digs through the documents and finds an account of such, which he has not, there's no real reason to posit the idea, except perhaps to muse.
but.. it makes sense!
I think 'poor academic metholodgy' is an exaggeration for adding the words 'or painted' to your sentence about coloured helmets, but to each their own
the armory..
historical arms&armor references
Impressive!
Oh, I am also trying to draw an armet (ref-1917 from the Mathias Gnoll archives), but I feel like I made the armet skull too close to the head
Huh, so the top of the head is fine? That is the thing that bugs me, I feel like I made it too close to the head
This is the part that bugs me
Head but stab:P
...What does that mean?
You just stab then you just headbut them then your very much looking down
Oh- Pfft. It isn't the spike motif that bugs me, it is how close the skull of the armet is to the head
I think I fixed it, but still not quite there yet
Pff- Fair
hello yall, ive been trying to draw a fan concept design for a game, is this armor set historically accurate ? or is there anything that i should add
the central ridge of the paunce of plates looks a little off center to the left of where it should be
also in the italian manner the tassets would likely have a semicircle "cutout"
although it is not a rule
Oh shit bloody bastards?
This is really good!!!
also i dont think there should be straps on the side of that armet
They connect the rondels ircc
the original armet didn’t have them
If I were to nitpick something regarding the fanart of that piece.. it’d maybe be the crest
what do you mean
no wait
the straps would be for like the wrapper i think
mby not i shouldn’t speak of something Im not entirely sure of
yes
of which that armet does not have
wouldnt removing the wrapper give that impression more
yeahh dude !!!
oh, olright
you play that game ??
Yeah
nicee what rank are you now ?
what 
how
ive been playing this cursed game for 1 year only to get gold 2
if you have multiple devices you can fight yourself
yeah i know that tactic, but how long have you been doing that ??
Took like two days or so
The game doesn’t really have many players nowadays you could easily get yourself in a match
yeah in other server apart from the eu one
is there any reference on how it looks like
wanna duel lad :3
Bloody Bastards?
is that the game youre going for?
played it a while ago, got boring so i quit
but nice fan art
only odd thing ive noticed is that the cuirass/faulds look a bit thicc
but im not sure
oh that thing, i want to add it to the design but got kinda complicated so i delete de og design :/
erm, its a fan concept design nawt a fan art 🤓
well if you don’t wanna add it than removing the straps should suffice
so you want the dev to add it?
thats cool
he had been active for a while in twitter, so i think why not try to give it a shot !
shoot your shot
add friend me if ye had time 👍
you miss all the shots you dont take
so what makes you bored of this game ?
plate helmet
so
how mad would you be if i stole that
probably not at all considering it isn’t his
it got repetitive, i fully completed the HRE, halfway done with England and the Rus. plus multiplayer was ass, it was just weird flailing and stuff.
Since when did you play bruh, theres new update already
i played a little after japan came out, but that was it
i started playing a few months before that
but by the update i wasnt really playing anymore
Quite the same case here
But i continue it after the new announcement by the dev
new announcement?
Yes, theres many weapon nerfing in game, like the double headed weapon and such.
the schlachtschwerts
the war/battle/prejudice/beef swords
I am not exactly sure if this fits in 1450-1470 (if it doesn't, I will delete it), but I found it cool (I think the spiky trefoil is supposed to represent The Holy Trinity)
looks like it does
wow
its the collar of the Order of the Swan from the holy roman empire! It was founded in 1440 but this chain is a reproduction from illustrations and statues in 1490.
order of the swan
Ooo! What were the precepts of the order? What was the order? I am deeply interested. Apologies for the late reply, Discord didn't ping me
1470-1480 Flanders, Leipzig, UB Rep. I 11b-1 and Rep. I 11b-1 - Valerius Maximus
Can we get a flamberge
Or the ability to flip over weapons to use the back end like on war hammers
The spiked bit
doesn't fit the timeperiod of the game
thought you were gonna suggest the ability to do a mordhau
Mordhau?
thats what its called when you hit someone with the pommel, right?
Pommel strike ig
Not that
this would be cool for all pollaxes not just the hammer one but yeah
Hitting that wrong without gloves gotta suck
it was an order of knights inspired by the tale of the swan knight, their purpose was mainly to praise the virgin Mary and be charitable. It was started by Elector Frederick II of Brandenburg.
its surprisingly not that bad if you don't allow the blade to slip with proper technique. You would use this technique as an absolute last resort if you got caught fighting armored opponents while being unarmored yourself. Skallagrim made a great video on this subject!
swords require a slicing motion or a hitting you motion to function properly, you’ll only get a few knicks here and there if you grab it right, no matter how hard you hit with it
is skallagrim even reputable? i mold him in with pop history slop youtubers ngl
it would be pre tty inconvenient to try and switch your grip on it and accidentally slide your hand down it though
matt easton/scholagladiatoria seems better for weapons anyway
Skallagrim is reputable in my opinion he cites his sources and doesnt spew constant bs with made up sources. he does do alot of pop culture content because on youtube its what gets promoted by the algorithm. right now his videos are struggling to get 100k+ views unfortunately.
this is 100% true but Skallagrim makes content on more obscure weapons that make his videos interesting in my opinion.
Not sure, but at the very least he's better than what Hollywood has to offer and... Whatever Shad is getting up to these days, I don't want to touch that guy with a 10 meter pole
lets not even mention him 💀
Yeah, prob for the best
Skallagrim is reputable in my opinion he cites his sources and doesnt spew constant bs with made up sources
skallagrim
In general he isnt that terrible yes he's had some "issues" in the past but I prefer to focus on the positives.
ive never seen him cite a source, and he is one of the many who keep saying "sword r bad lolol". u may find him entertaining, but he really isnt reputable for "history"
oh shit the history police are back
yeah man, i think the guy with a bigass following who just says shit online isnt a reputable source
This is the problem with YouTube research, you end up not knowing what research is.
Citing sources is meaningless if those sources are erroneous
In general youtube is only useful if you have a passing interest in something, it's not suitable for anything more.
sure, you would never cite skallagrim lol. but he refers to his sources, shows pages of books on his videos, and does practical tests of his own. I don't think he spreads misinformation in videos where he is being serious. not saying he doesn't dish out heaps of slop but he also has nearly 400 videos on swords many of which are just him being an enthusiast
not necessarily. there are some decent lectures and one historian on youtube I particularly like is Allan Barton.
I've seen skallagrim cite videogame Wikipedias as sources.
yeah like his "no one would ever EVER wear a coif over bare skin bro" video
then we had to deal with that nonsense for a good few months before people forgot
and i mean, come on, half the things are super easy to find. matt easton is especially guilty of this too
videos of him "just being an enthusiast" is literally my point
and whether or not it is intentional, people do literally take him at face value
your point that he keeps saying swords are bad but is an enthusiast sword owner?
I'm interested to know what weapons he thinks make swords bad in comparison.
muh stick...
The problem with saying spears are better than swords is it's like saying that one piece of cutlery is better than another for eating food.
It also depends on what spear we're talking about because there's a certain length and diameter of pole where spears very quickly become very different weapons.
It's just a bad take when we literally hundreds of accounts and treatises that explain why the sword was important
So easy to find, I literally found them daily
We need sabaton to make a song about spears 
bro trve....
in like, 30 min to an hour too. genuinely the easiest shit ever and these people cant spend 30 min scrolling google books or some shit lol
Well people see that the spear was the most common weapon throughout history and take that to mean it was the best. Ignoring the fact that they were some of the easiest to make and long spears were particularly suited to line fights, which were the most common types of fights.
i mean, depending on the period, statistically speaking a sword might be more common lol
the poke and prod model of combat is just outright mistaken anyways though
If you're in a line fight you'll generally want a spear, when the line eventually breaks you almost definitely want something that isn't a spear.
If you shorten your spear you're most likely done for
A true man at arms shortens his lance many times, down even to the point, when he needs a dagger
Not because shortening spears is bad but if you're In a situation that calls for it then you're probably fucked
I assume you mean in the middle of battle
Breaking the spear in half on my knee like a madlad
Dodging a few crossbow bolts in the process too btw
Funny Anglo archers picking up broken spear points off the ground to fight with
Yea, in a 1v1 it's less of an issue.
Anglo archers being crackheads again
There isn't really a hierarchy of weapons, like every weapon has something that counters it.
wdym in a 1v1
in a 1v1 unless its prepared before hand you arent shortening your spear in the middle of the fight lol
On nuketown
the almogavars would break their spears in half to fight at close quarters
You can, it's not hard.
my headcanon is that is where the anglo-french men at arms got that from 🙂
maybe if ur opponent is a gentleman lol
Many honor such knoghthood
By shorten I mean hold the spear closer to the point
oh so u do lol
Hack the wood with your sword and make your commander foam at the mouth because you just destroyed 5 swords this week doing that kind of shit
truth
ur captain is just gonna give you pig stickers
actually in the 14th c. thats what they called estocs
in french
epais or something
Also when people compare weapons they often leave out important factors of the time like armour, the existence of armour is a much bigger issue for a spearman than it is for a swordsman.
Espee?
yeah i cant find it but its used in a bunch of the 2nd half of the 14th c. works
to refer to estocs
The stickler
Also I say spears are suited to line fights but it's important to consider how much less you can maneuver a spear in a line fight, often the spear will be completely sandwiched
Or maybe thrown to the floor/smashed to pieces by something like a Billhook.
tbh i wouldnt even say suited to formation fighting, but just suited to fighting in the broad sense
when there is less space, then shorter weapons become more advantageous
although swords were still occasionally/often "primary" weapons depending on the date, region, etc
but i mean we have the texts to know why swords might be used. like Auray (1364), Najera (1367), Chiset (1373), Aljubarrota (1385), Verneuil (1424), Brouwershaven (1426) for the men at arms alone show that guys came to close quarters, whether by chance (Najera) or on purpose (Chiset)
and obviously cavalry especially came to close quarters a lot
Nowhere near as effective outside of formations. At least for long spears. short spears are completely different weapons in their usage so I consider them very much distinct from longer spears
Short spears I feel are much closer to swords when it comes to the general role they play, 7foot spears are very fast and very offensive, you can out-maneuver basically anything with them. Add only like one or two feet to the length and increase the diameter and they become cumbersome and much more defensive.
Nah, most fencers just suck with spears. Even pikes, as per the fencing masters, are great for duels. And when one is fighting loosely, by nature, they are almost completely unconstrained in their movement
It doesn't matter how unconstrained you are. I'm 6'5 and notorious for being able to use a 9foot spear even in extremely close quarters, but nothing will change the fact that long spear weighs far more than a short spear does.
Longer spears were usually tapered, and a lot of guys didn't hold them by the complete end
But I do think it is just a matter of skill, since most hemaists just aren't that good with spears in the first place, and the fencing masters wrote that pikes still hold the advantage in spite of their relative clumsiness
It has nothing todo with skill, I'm good enough with a long spear that I can very easily use it against basically anything, that doesn't mean I think it's good for all of those purposes.
A long spear simply won't move as fast as a short spear will.
You have to realise how much heavier spears get when you increase the diameter of the shaft.
My 9foot spear has to be about 3 times as heavy as my 7foot spear.
the diameter shouldnt be increasing
It very much should, if nothing else you need the weight with longer spears or else everyone else will be able to easily overpower your weapon.
Diameter has to increase with length or else the spear becomes extremely easy to break.
"The Pikes arm'd at the Points with Lozange heads, if the cheeks, or sides of the Pikes are not armed with thin Plates of Iron four Foot deep, are very apt to be broken off near the Heads, if the Push be vigorous, and the Resistance considerable: Nor is this all; for unless the Pikes be armed with those thin Iron Plates, they are easily cut off with sharp Swords, for the Pike, especially toward the end, is carried tapering, to poise it the better, and thereby renders it the more flippent for those who use it..."
for example
the risk of being overpowered was a necessity to move the weapon
modern hafts in general tend to be thicker
You're the one holding it with your hands, you can afford for it to be heavy, if the shaft is light then someone else can easily manipulate your spear with their own weapon.
just dont allow your weapon to be manipulated, which is easier to do when it is light
One of the big advantages of long spears that short spears utterly lack is being able to control weapons and not be controlled by other people.
It's absolutely not, swing a heavy weapon into a light weapon and the heavy weapon will always win.
the light weapon is being used by someone who can move their arms. yes, heavier weapons can control the light weapon, but the light weapon can just not get in their scenario in the first place; and since the pike only truly offends with the point, that is probably the way you ought to be using it
the same theory goes for rapier vs broadsword etc
most hemaists dont actually move their spears much though
Which is why a short spear has to be used very differently than a long spear. Short spears are at a ludicrous disadvantage against longer heavier spears.
Like I said, it starts to act alot more like a sword
the pike has a lot of momentum even when the haft is not thicker, yes
although im not sure why the piker would allow his weapon to be overtaken in the bind by someone with a short weapon
and against a piker with a heavy pike, he (the man with the swift weapon) probably would have, in my opinion, the advantage
not that this couldnt happen, obviously it can
but since your weak is so long, im kind of doubting that the weight is actually advantageous anyways
Look man I've spent alot of time using both, enough to say that In a fight against a long spear and a short spear, the long spear has the advantage by far, mainly due to the weight.
I've straight up disarmed shorter spears many times.
the long spear should have the advantage by reach alone. even with a thinner haft it will have more momentum in the thrust and a quicker point with the beat
If a long spear has a light shaft then a swordsman could easily bat it out the way.
if it is heavy, he is still pushing against your weak
The reach is an advantage, the weight is the biggest advantage
with a light shaft, you just dont let your weapon get beat
This is easy to say if you've never used these weapons.
I could use my long spear to whack a short spear of yours straight to the floor or even out of your hands completely, there's really nothing you can do about it other than evading.
no its easy to say when its literally what the fencing masters say. theres no reason why you should be contesting the bind + the weapons were tapered and not made thicker, and with a swift point you can avoid having your point beat off line with more ease in the first place
also i have half the mind to say you might be able to wack a short spear even with a lighter haft
In a short spear vs long spear fight the short spear user has to be quick and on the offensive, you have to use the lighter spear like a sword. Hell alot of the time when I've beaten long spears with a short spear it's because I let go with one hand and grab their spear and then run in and jab them.
im not arguing against that
but hemaists with spears suck at offending with the point (which means the heavier weapon has the advantage) and also suck at defending against spear thrusts (which means a weapon doesnt need to be so swift)
90% of hemaists ive seen just stab with maybe a little defense, a lot just rush to the dagger
(because they suck with the spear)
did they remove the requirements for the references to be specifically in the england-france-hre area
cause it feels like there were some restrictions about the area before
At the end of the day your interpretation of old texts does not grant you a higher understanding of what a weapon is capable of than actually using them. The differences I'm pointing out are very immediately obvious the moment you use these weapons.
Also you keep bringing up pikes, neither long or short spears in this context are pikes.
Again I'm specifically known for being annoyingly good with a long spear in extremely short distances, like handshake distances.
the swiss used 10 foot long pikes. thick shafts ive never seen very much, except for the byzantines who had the thick shafts to face cataphracts (maybe)
not using the old texts means you get situations where people do nothing but lunge from the low guard, never pass, and maybe a third of all of them know how to use their legs/hips. im not saying your experience is irrelevant, but the grosso modo "just wack their point" could only be as dominant as you say when the opponent is incapable of moving their point very much, which most hemaists with spears are almost incapable of doing. although against a short spear, i would think it wouldnt matter if you beat their weapon offline (not really sure why you would feel the need to in the first place but idk) with the lighter 9 foot haft or a heavier one, the speed of the point is so great that you get a lot of force
Also Im not talking about hema, I'm talking about full contact or partial contact armoured fighting.
Pikes were longer and used differently than long spears, long spear in this context is longer than a short spear but not long enough to be a like. Pikes are usually around 10-20feet long.
since no one can hardly offend with the point of their spears (and people with pollaxes like to just bash, even though all the sources say to use the point primarily, and threaten with the strike)
Diameter doesn't need to increase with length past 10feet or it woild become impossibly heavy
I'm specifically talking about less than ten foot long spears.
if it doesnt need to increase past 10 feet then im not sure why it would need to increase below 10 feet. have you tried a thinner haft? only reason why you wouldnt is that them breaking can maybe become dangerous (but then i would just say dont taper). not sure what thickness oskar uses
It's because of control, if a longer spear has a thinner shaft it becomes a directly worse weapon.
And because after ten feet it becomes a different weapon again.
You want it to be heavier because generally you loose control with added length, the weight makes up for that.
The longer the weapon is the less leverage you'll have over your opponents weapon
Both spears in that photo are meant for very different uses.
Spear on the left has terrifying thrusts compared to the right one, right hand spear is much more swingy and lightning fast.
I could possibly sweep you off of your legs with the left one, not with the right one.
it definitely doesnt become a worse weapon for the same reason a 7 foot long spear with a normal haft doesnt become a worse weapon against a 5 foot long spear. why are would someone contest the bind against a weapon with superior leverage? its easier to be put in that position in the first place with a weapon that is almost 3x heavier than otherwise. if they are moving their spear, and not just throwing their arms forward to thrust from the short guard, then i see no reason why a thinner shaft would be so detrimental as you suppose. if a 10 foot pike is held a foot or two away from the heel, it does not become a weapon whose point is easily thrown off line by a sneeze if the wielder does not allow their weapon to be bullied (which if they are actively fencing, they wouldnt).
You've really got to dual or fight with these weapons to understand what I'm saying, there are many factors more inherent to different lengths of spear that determine how it's best used.
I could easily push you back by placing a single finger near the top center of your ribcage and pushing, absolutely nothing you can do to prevent it nomatter how strong you are. Why is this relevant? Because anyone who hasn't tried it or had it tried on them will think it's bullshit, and likely not really understand the physics behind it.
What the fuck happened here?
if your ultra heavy spear is disadvantageous in a duel because its so cumbersome, then i dont see why it is superior to a weapon to a weapon of the same length that wouldnt be nearly as cumbersome (and which would hold the advantage in a duel against a shorter weapon). and if someone cannot use the benefit of a light weapon, and allows themselves to be bullied, that is not the fault of the weapon being light and it doesnt mean a 3x as heavy weapon is the solution to their problems (nor was it the solution historically). if a 10 foot pike can be light (a couple of cm thick), then why isnt it bullied by a 9 foot spear? why isnt a 7 foot spear bullied by a 5 foot spear? again, if the weapon is bad for duels because its cumbersome, then simply dont have it be so cumbersome
It's not an ultra heavy spear, it's directly better than the shorter spear in the situations it's made for.
Which is line fights.
Short spear isn't made for line fights.
how thick is the haft? 5 cm?
Hell I did an arming of the knight demonstration at a festival recently, I was the knight being armed and I was given both a long spear and a short spear, as they would transport both for different situations, at least in the earlier medieval period.
they did also just chop their spears down to 5 feet long
Five feet long is like two feet shorter than my shortest spear
No, long spear is like 3.4cm and short spear is like 2.8cm
yes, they liked their tiny spears
well, until they took up the 5 feet long pollaxes
Actually I'm not sure the long spear is that thick
3.3 maybe 3.4 for the long spear
3.4cm over 2.8 cm might not seem like much but add two feet to the length and work out how much the volume of the wood has actually increased.
where do you grip it? the heel?
I use the long spear many different ways, at the back, in the middle, depends what I'm fighting.
then idk why u find it bad for dueling
It's simply not made for dualing, at least not compared to how good it is in other contexts.
You can be an amazing spearman in a dual. But you could also be an amazing swordsman and an amazing swordsman will likely win.
"Each man at arms carried his spear right before him, cut down to the length of five feet; an axe, sharp, strong and well steeled, with a short handle, was at his side, or hung from his neck."
"WHEN the battalions of the king of France were drawn up, and each lord posted under his proper banner, and informed how they were to act, it was ordered, that all those who were armed with lances should shorten them to the length of five feet, that they might be the more manageable, and that every one should take off his spurs."
"He advanced with his men on foot, to meet the enemy, who were formed in close order with their pikes, shortened to five feet, planted out before them."
"They cut their lances to five feet in length, and ordered their servants to carry their spurs to the slope of the hill, where they were to fix them with the rowels uppermost; so that their enemies might not ascend the hill at their ease."
"Having dismounted his men, he caused their lances to be shortened to the length of five feet, and placed his pennon before him, which had his arms, ermine, three humets in pale gules."
"When they had thus for some time kept them in check, their grand battalion, fresh and untouched, advanced by a secret road round the hill, and being in close order like a brush, with their lances cut down to six feet or thereabouts, with loud cries, and a thorough good will, fell upon the French army."
(auray, poitiers, calais, st valery, champagne, brignais i think, via froissart)
yes i agree, especially in an armored context, but the longer weapon should still hold the advantage even when in armor
5foot spear is way better for duals
nah these guys were cutting them down for mass assaults
the french did so at azincourt too (no length given) with wauvrin, who was part of the french force i think, saying they did so to make the spears stiffer
Okay put it this way, I trained with long spear for the best part of a year before I got got try short spear, I was good with a long spear but I I brutalised people in 1v1s with the short spear basically immediately, short spears are so much more scary in 1v1s against anything that doesn't outrage and overpower it.
A long spear that's just as light as a short spear could be easily parried by the short spear since it has more leverage
The only way that can happen consistently if they are allowing themselves to be contested in the bind. I'm not sure how you get in that position with 2 feet of extra reach though. Just refuse the bind, move your point when he attempts to beat it, and don't be hasty. Ur 6'5" and presumably strong and I hope lean enough to maneuver, with a 9 foot spear that is nimble you should be literally untouchable
The spork
Yea, I pretty much am, hence why Im so hard to beat with a long spear, it's literally the weapon im best with.
Flails could be cool
Like if you use it wrong you would hit yourself
But it could hit hard
Those fails didn't exist in any time period close to medieval.
This is what they looked like, what you're thinking of is from the imagination of victorians.
Still
funny cause this depiction isn't even medieval
though ofc they did look like that
Not necessarily
These are all early 15th century iirc
By Paulus Hector Mair, I would argue that considering his work was mostly recreating older texts I would pass the weapons as valid (obviously not the clothes, tho)
weird fantasy-ism in some cases i think, but the first one here is from a manuscript by Konrad Kyeser called the bellifortis which depicts various weapons/engines of war and has no reason to be fantasized that I see
1100-1150, italy
italian
guhh
See again.
hmmm
I still think the amount of depictions we have, and how they appear across several different centuries, means they were probably a real thing and not fantastical/victorian
one handed war flails, anyway
two handed threshing/'peasant' flails were certainly real
You only see them depicted in manuscripts like that. Unlike most known medieval weapons they are never described nor are there any remains of them.
At best I think the flail as it's most commonly depicted was at most like a failed experimental weapon that never really actually saw any use.
And from what I read the only reason the flails we do know about existed is because they're modified farming equipment.
maybe, I don't have any more evidence that I know of that supports the existence of them so i suppose we're at an impasse
They may very well have existed, in my mind I feel like it's something at least one person tried to make at some point.
Surely somebody would have tried to make itm
either way we need threshing flails in the game, though they would probably be hard to do with the physics
Did mancatchers/catchpoles exist at any point during the 15th Century? Or were they something that existed only on the 17th century or around that time?
I don't think so, I've never seen any
here is a in-period depiction as well showing that they are certainly used in fencing at the time of the game. it's a page from Talhoffer's Berlin Treatise MS 78.A.15 (written sometime around the mid to late 1450s I think)
check out "Fantastic Flails and Where to Find Them: The Body of Evidence for the Existence of Flails in the Early and High Medieval Eras in Western, Central, and Southern Europe"
they were used in the tournament melees in the 13th and 14th c. at least
hard to know if they (i mean the more "typical" type) were military weapons in western europe
They are also used in war, not just fencing
they seem more or less universal for the medieval period and probably later as well. Whether they were always used as weapons is a different story, though I would think they were always used for this purpose as well given how they are perfectly functional both in and out of battle, but threshing flails are seen throughout the medieval period
yes but in terms of adding them to half sword, only fencing matters, because it is a fencing environment. I just wanted to contextualize it from a proper in-period source rather than a 16th century one
only thing I've heard of them being used militarily is the hussite wars, but I don't have a source for that or anything I just remember reading it. I would say though that specifically is what I would call a special case
honestly though I don't have much access to manuscripts to check up on it anyways, and any that I might would be in a language I can't read
yeah that's the most well-known usage of these, but i don't see a reason why this would not be done in other similar cases
yea there's probably lots of other wars that had similar use, since they can be converted easily from the thresher and just out of basic necessity
it also appears in other martial contexts in ms iirc
just don't know of any specifics though
they were being used by night-watchmen in the 17th c.
peasants got involved in minor skirmishes a lot so i wouldnt be surprised
personal opinion, medieval armor looks way better than modern armor
ys, a lot less focus on aesthetics now though in general
like there's no equivalent of the king's armor nowadays, they don't have gold threaded kevlar or something lol
maybe they should tho
two handed 'threshing flails'?
yeah with spikes
There is two types of flails depending on Country of origin and the reason of its existence
@robust tendon
Military flails were basically a wooden stick, with a chain and the spikey ball at the end of x chain. Aka the basic flail we see in fantasy and video games
The flail often used for fencing was the wooden stick with the wooden end that was basically a spikey wooden...club basically
Country of origin matters for this particularly because they only allow weapons from France, Italy, Britian, Germany and I think Hungaria and also I think Switzerland
Military flails and the "fencing flails" mostly came from Italy and older Military flails came from the middle east
If your grace sees that one comes at you with a Flail, at night, and will strike at you, (how it then is occasionally in use at the Universities, when one goes from the table, and from the guards will be attacked, if often one has previously done something to the guards, and another comes, because of the need to pay for what the other has wrought) then whip your cloak over your left arm, and run under his Flail with great power, so that one then will strike in over you, be mindful of his power your grace, then wrench the flail from his hands, for the protection of your life and limb.
for the non-threshing flails they might be only depicted here because they have old fashioned and foreign connotations, but there's one depicted by Schonguaer in 1480 and possibly (hard to tell it's so dark and blurry) this 1484 painting
I definitely hope they add threshing flail for lower tier
In terms of the Schongauer it is very confusing, ‘cause yeah it’s possible it’s there to make it feel archaic, but at the same time right behind Christ there’s a guy in a visored bascinet much like a hounskull, and a couple later polearms that match the period it was engraved by (quite common for artists to do when drawing/engraving older scenes), so it conflicts to feel archaic while feeling so present day.
Edit: read back your post and realized you said foreign connotations too, that is possible since we see a lot of the middle eastern style here, specifically of the ones dragging Jesus
Since it’s so out in the open, to the point that it’s actually being shown wrapping around that smug guy, I think it definitely had some sort of symbolism though, of what exactly I don’t know.
Don't get me wrong I hope flails did exist because then I'd have an excuse to have the flail that my reenactment group is giving away.
yeah I agree with your view on them too and they seem rare but Im grasping at straws because I think they would be fun to see with this game's physics
I mean hell they could add a setting to turn questionable weapons on or off just for the hell of it. Not saying they should because it's extra work, but like, if I was making halfsword I'd probably do it.
if they at least add in threshing flails then someone could probably just mod in one of those one handers, though it would require a couple modding capabilities we haven’t exactly figured out yet
Slapping down on the commoner boss with a thresher would be amazing
I do think I'd personally find any excuse to put flails in a game around physics, they're meant for each other, even if flails have questionable authenticity
in my view, because they're depicted so often and across several centuries, it's evidence enough for one handed war flails. but it's conjecture obviously
and it's not exactly an unusable or obvious fantasy weapon, it just has modern connotations as fantasy when to medieval people it may not be
there's also this in the hafted weapons book by john waldman but Id take it with a grain of salt like everything else
yo devs take notes, all the armor pieces rn look like mirror polished artworks
pretty sure well polished didnt mean walking mirror
this is cosplay
i dont think medieval knights had access to polishing compound and buffing wheels
okay okay fine
i didnt read this far into it
Even Romans had access to metal polishing, so yea
Sure not the same as today but it worked
they absolutely did
Armour polished, lances shapened!
1450-1455, the Low Countries, KBR 9243 - Chroniques de Hainaut
This source seems to be often overlooked by modern students of medieval military technology, yet it is very important. The scene shows the refurbishment of arms in field conditions: the cuirasses are polished, and the lance heads are sharpened. The latter is performed in two ways - on a large grindstone set on a table, and on a smaller grindstone held in hands.
It would appear as if the armour polishing is done by a professional polisher (it was a distinct occupation back in the day) - we see a soldier waiting to pass his helmet on for the treatment, after the polisher will be done with the cuirass. Note how the cuirass is secure onto the bench with straps.
In contrast, it looks like lance sharpening was a self-service job, as we see fully armed knights engaged at that activity. The military camps must have had such armour maintenance points, where anyone could polish or sharpen, or repair some items when needed.
neat little pic
the quality of the model here should be a massive red flag
Looks weird
U look weird
Bruh
Brah
“All the armor pieces look like mirror polished artworks”
What if Willie's head was mirror polished artwork?
You say that as if it isn’t!
Willie's head is beautiful, but not nearly as reflective as it could be
to each their own
then why did you act more knowledgeable than the developers?
because we must not research before posting
hatred
That helmet looks like it's locked the fuck in
Maybe possible. Now I can’t read German, but I do understand some of the names of the museums listed here to have flails, in this particular case one-handed ones. However, I don’t know if they still have em, this book if from like 1880 something if I remember correctly
One sec I’ll send the illustrations too so you can see the flails these are numbered by
The only museum I’ve checked is Prague (not in person just tried searching it up) which didn’t seem to come up with any specific results of still having one, but I can check the others
If anyone here can read German perhaps they could shed some light on this
I tried searching for a bibliography in this book but I didn’t see anything strikingly similar without being able to read it
the fully polished steel looks ass so they should tone it down though
they were used in tournament melees since the 13th c. so theres clearly an issue in discerning whether or not they were actually used in war
one handed flails were used elsewhere though
like in near and far asia
heya lads, ive been working on this armor for a game concept design. what did yall think is it good enough ?
or do i need to add something to it ?
yo fencer, whatcha think ?
is there anything i should add lad ?
seems perfectly fine to me
olright ! thank you lad, have a nice day
hmm maybe tomorrow, my phone's kinda low battery
shoot me a dm when your ready
yeah, this duel gonna be fire
perhaps
blooodddyyy baaastaarrdddddhdbf
Blood Bastards (the better version)
bb hre armour if it was above mediocre quality
really wish the game was given more love and care because it has such a good art style and direction but the first two regions suffer from such neglect of quality
russia and japan were the only good ones :(
yeah those ones were really really good
tsardom and sengoku japan brought some great quality stuff
also dont forget the ranked items
personally i loved the greenwich armor
yeah fr fr
so how long have ye been playing this game ?
100% tho bb didn’t give it much justice as I hoped it would
ive also posted this to tibith's twitter, since thats the only place he was active apart from his website, is that a good idea ?
