they are pretty ubiquitous
#references♥_1450-1470
1 messages · Page 24 of 1
Arming swords with finger rings, from the Pastrana Tapestries (1471)
then send it in general
this is a chat for historical discussion
Very late response but the shoulder rondel is the unusual part it isnt period or place appropriate to the rest of it the mixture of the elements is what makes it anachronistic the specific shoulder roundel and elbow rondel are mismatched and the elbow was originally a nipple shape what I was saying is that the whole piece is strange and has visible differences to other pieces im not saying that its impossible for it to be based off an original but its styling is unorthodox
this is from a c.1500 manuscript but given as sam said the ubiquity of the type of armour and the likelihood that such a configuration of armour was likely transmitted for many decades, it's entirely plausible that such a combination of rondel and other components was used at one point during 1440-1480 (the fullest extent of time for HS with the give/take 10 years) which doesnt seem unorthodox to me i m h o
banquet mode when
oh ok sorry
Can the axehead of an Halberd cut into an breastplate or vambrace?
A search gives mixed results but the consensus makes it seem like it's possible under specific circumstances.
I'm mostly looking at 14th century armor.
9/10 times no
depends on steel quality but it's safe to say it's highly unlikely to cut through plate armor
piercing is more likely but still not common at all
if you want to pierce armor, your best shot is using a handgun/handcannon or lancing it
even so in the case of lances, the holes made are very small
hardly going right through like it's sheet metal
best armor penetration a halberd can provision is via its top spike through the gaps in someones plate to my knowledge however a blow to the head against someone wearing a helm with a halberd head is still gonna deliver a lot of good blunt force
I guess that the two are different

grinch’s brigandine
a French armor (left) and an Iberian harness (right)
Us
Fr
1440-1460 France, BNF Français 1291 - Book of the Hunt
this is rad
what's the third image meant to be depicting?
idk
anybody got the weird depictions of dragons from 1400s
Presentation of the book from author to patron/dedicatee
cool, couldn’t tell if it was a book or not because of the weird circles
thanks
add the sticky blicky
those winged spears are gorgeous
HALBERD GAMING LES GOOOO
boar spears they call them !
ive heard them referred to as either
indeed
id like the macuahitl as a secret weapon
there is legitimately 0 reason for this to be in game
too late for the game most likely
about 1495 to 1505 germany most likely its an owl face sallet
i wouldnt consider it an owl face sallet
deep-brimmed sallet
owl face sallets have 4 distinct slits usually and encompass the whole face, usually worn with a gorget
found it dating was a bit off its from 1510
will there be grand bascinets added to the game?
likely !
it's just called a sallet by the Wallace Collection. Chris Dobson describes it among 'black sallets' because it's rough, unpolished, and used to be painted (but not on the visor).
comparable helmets also just referred to as sallet or visored sallet. similar german one in the bavarian national museum is also just called a Schaller.
https://www.bayerisches-nationalmuseum.de/en/collection/00047755
i think we should have a black sallet thread here at some point to discuss whether we as a collective think they were painted or covered with textile
because this is a hot button issue that keeps popping up i feel
the key definition repeated by Oakshott, the Royal Armouries quoting Oakshott, and Dobson (probably paraphrasing Oakshott lol) is that they were often left rough and ‘black from the hammer’- hence the term ‘black sallet’. not that they were necessarily painted or covered in textile, although there is a consistent correlation with surviving examples being painted or formerly painted
the one above in the Wallace collection did used to be painted. it was cleaned off
my first instinct would be that it was a victorian who painted it
art that shows them, i think, supports the textile
the holes on the edges of surviving pieces do too
dubious
WC says " This unusual sallet, its visor decorated with embossed eyes and nose, was once at least partially painted. In the middle of the 19th century it was still painted with black and yellow flames flowing over the skull from the front and the back. Two other sallets, with skulls of the same, rounded form (now in the collections at Žleby Castle in the Czech Republic and the Worcester Art Museum, USA), retain very similar paint schemes. "
depends which type
Dobson divides them into Dürer's Knigth Death and Devil shape as "so-called ‘sou-wester’ shape" and those usually with the two slit occuli as 'owl-faced'
those typical sallets (with or without owl-faced) examples do not have such lining holes
the 'sou-wester' tend to
it's an anachronism but clearly an attempt at typology
Oakshott has no citation and Wallace Collection never uses the term at all
probably tacitly refuting Oakshott/Royam Amouries/Dobson
I consider it as an anachronism but a harmless one that helps typology and facilitates understanding of why the simpler (typically 'owl-faced') sallets look the way they do
likewise Alan Williams and other more technical, reputable sources do not use the term at all implying it's obsolete.
one in the Worcester museum appears to have been painted twice AND has holes for a lining to cover it lol
probably anyone lucky enough to have gotten a copy of this would know the truth
cause he talks about proper inventories in an earlier article and has a spot in a subchapter in this book dedicated to clarifying the topic
with something like this I'd say it's hard to be 100% certain, so you may as well go with what has the most evidence
there's like none that i've seen pointing to black sallets being painted
but heaps to show it was covered
you could maybe argue that they did it before, so they could have done it later. (maciejowski bible's painted greathelms and some iberian examples of other helmets being painted) but it's conjecture and "well they could have done it"
they could have also worn outdated armor but we know they didn't
cause there's no evidence
it's definitely possible that "black" sallets were painted but the reasoning given by nearly every defendant of the point is bupkis
to me the notion just seems like a continuation of victorians assuming it was painted and the idea being brought to life when otherwise there would be no argument to make
if that makes sense
it does
yeah, i mean it's totally "possible" they painted every bit of armor sometimes, but 1. it doesn't show up in art, at least later and 2. majority of surviving examples and depictions show armor which is likely covered or certainly covered
so if you're shooting for 100% accuracy, probably best to just say they're covered
on a post from myarmoury.com a guy states this
"It seems most reasonable to assume that the paired stitch-holes pierced around the edges of so many 'black' sallets were provided for the attachment of a fabric covering, even if, as in the case of Leeds, Vienna and the present example, their purchasers ultimately elected to embellish them with painted decoration."
im really curious as to why anyone would want it "black from the hammer" or why they would be made with the specific purpose of attaching fabrics
i wouldnt assume everyone who would've wanted one (which i would guess would be 1. people who want to have a helmet that is more conducive to being tipped upward in its entirety and worn like a kettle and 2. people who would prefer to wear a larger sallet so they can "safely" omit a bevor, like light cavalry, which would probably also benefit from point 1.) would want to decorate them to the point that the "norm" is INTENDED to be decorated further
"or why they would be made with the specific purpose of attaching fabrics"
Wallace collection / Dobson both refer to this painting to propose that the likely purpose of attaching fabrics was likely as a kind of proto-uniform to identify bands of soldiers
!!
"It was quite customary at this period to buy the sallet and then have it embellished to your own tastes afterwards, much of the adornment found on sallets of this period were done by workshops other than those of the armourer, those of the goldsmiths etc. Regarding the provision of holes for the possible fitting of a fabric covering,in England there had been a law since 1322 that forbade the selling of any helmet that was already covered with fabric.If memory serves me correctly, this law was passed because of some unscrupulous Italian agents and dealers selling inferior or damaged helmets etc.as first rate after they had been covered with material.Possibly similar laws existed elsewhere too? It is indeed difficult to see any other possible explanation for the holes around the visor pivot other than for the attachment of a fabric covering."
"im really curious as to why anyone would want it "black from the hammer" I dont think the 'blackness' is literal at all? I believe it's figurative referring to their roughness and lack of polish. the simple shapes of both types seem to indicate that the preference was, at least originally, because they were cheaper than the more elegantly shaped and finished, polished sallets. it's possible that more wealthy soldiers liked the shape and requested it for the sake of aesthetics, but the general indication seems to be they were cheaper originally
i have to say, every depiction of a soldier in a black sallet that comes to mind involves quite a bit more color than im used to seeing on a late 1400s horseman, so maybe there is something there
by saying "black from the hammer" im just using the phrase you used to describe it earlier to mean "unfinished looking"
plenty of men at arms wearing black sallets seem wealthy to me, especially the one seen in durer's illustration, and i wouldnt assume that it was for cost reasons - additionally, it is a fairly low cost to polish a helmet compared to buying the armor itself
i would say the shaping on the extant black sallets is less for aesthetics and more so you can tip it upward as a whole
the cost hypothesis seems entirely rational to me. especially when, when depicted in larger numbers, the cavalry wearing them always appear to be lightly armoured. German cavalrymen are notoriously poorer than more western counterparts
anyway things change too
my hypothesis would be that the crudeness and simpler shapes were originally, perhaps, a cost saving measure. but then, it may have become fashionable, hence the ranks of good looking cavalry wearing various coloured 'black' sallets and matching harnesses in the Triumphzug / Durer's horseman
there is no way that armourers were selling those black sallets for the same price as those that had more finish, no hammer marks, were polished, and much more carefully and elegantly shaped
thus even if it was incidental - they would have been cheaper
Wallace Collection more or less concurs too. they imply a mass production context
While it is true that there is an almost complete dearth of visual sources and possibly documents recording the existence of painted sallets (one extremely rare exception being an undigitized depiction of Herzogen Heinrich and Ludwig of Bayern-Landshut in the BnF, Paris [Lugt 28] - authentic, copied from the genealogical frescoes once in the Alten Hof, Munich, this according to Franz Niehoff in the 2009 exhibition catalogue Ritterwelten im Spätmittelalter, p. 166) - there is also the fact that several extent sallets are painted with varying degrees of restoration (some obviously much more heavily and well recorded than others - such as the Grosse Schallern in the KHM and the half armour in the Glasgow Museum), that does not mean that every extant painted sallet is the product of restoration.
furthermore, you get into conspiracy theory territory without good documentation proving that the extant painted sallets in various institutions were all simply the imaginative products of restoration. they exhibit very similar painted designs; reputable published historians don't dispute their authenticity (excepting the known fully restored ones) ; and they in themselves serve as evidence of the practice. if there is a good publication that goes over how the whole practice of painting them is a fraud then I would be convinced, but otherwise the extant examples are good evidence of the practice.
lastly, there is also the matter of how one chooses to interpret the available visual evidence. Dobson, who of course has an agenda makes an effort to argue in favour of his position, suggests that the 1502 painting above may very well depict painted helmets or helmets lined by fabric. that's a perfectly reasonable position. I think there is no good reason to wholesale disregard the possibility that some were painted as they are now.
historians also note that the painting protects from corrosion. there are also numerous other contemporaneous forms of decoration of virtually every other material means available lol
the exclusion of painting as a means of decoration, given that there is evidence of it, makes less sense than keeping the possibility of its practice open
yes painted with a style not at all shown in period artwork (despite that style being almost omnipresent on the "surviving" examples) and almost always having holes for an external liner
cost? theyre horsemen
this isnt 1415
the heart of armor production, polishing is not at all somehow prohibitively expensive
not anymore than the armor is at least
looking crude =/= being crude
they dont even look crude either
anyways the helmets themselves are from that period where armor would be repurposed later in life for parades and stuff (~1490-1510 being repurposed in i believe 1530-1550)
.
it might have been actually painted in its life, but probably not painted in its life as actual military equipment
the helmet itself was faked a ton though by victorians
this helmet is among those repurposed
iirc
anyways neither of those are among the "black sallet" group
(dobson is kind of a hack)
this falls under "it could have been done, so it must have been done"
(fallacious reasoning)
except again, those "similar painted designs" NEVER pop up in period artwork
which is just more evidence against the painted designs being from the same period that they were worn as military equipment
it's not just polishing
here's my full response / account of the topic
one covered by Dupras in Royal Armouries is legitimately cruder than other sallets
is there any evidence for this?
any evidence?
never said must
What, that the helmet was faked a ton?
never said must
its the assumption that people think they MUST be authentic thats silly lol
I keep an open mind
I am open to evidence
yeah, I'd love to see it legitimately
Can't find the article on it. Two of them were pulled from the royal armories website though for that reason iirc
So the evidence is in their existence lol
usually existence is good evidence that something exists yes
They also painted old cuirasses. There's one breastplate that's white and green, and the paint has been dated I believe 50 years later
Then saying the exclusion makes no sense makes even less sense
The exclusion is not done because it's useless, it's done because the evidence for it is not convincing
I would totally accept the possibility that they were repainted relatively shortly after their practical lifespan for parades, ceremonies etc
that seems fair given the flamboyant / monstrous designs imply more schembart context than a battlefield
Painted armor for battlefield use does also show up in the early-ish 16th century (I don't mean just blackened, but actually painted)
not being convinced is a matter of opinion
I think 1530s-1550
Still not super common and probably not done cuz it was cheap
yeah apparently baked in gold paint as a cheaper option to make things gold was a thing
exactly
Are you talking about the one that has a square nut for the visor pivot
yeah he mentions that bits of it which are modern
that being one lol
his thesis is free I link it
Calling it crude because its not shaped like other sallets is silly
The visor being not flush can be explained by the fact that it would have been worn with an external liner
It's also not the most well maintained helmet either
for the RA one IV.13 its not just the shape though. its what he calls the planishing and smoothing.
for the others - their shapes are definitely simpler and less complex and elegant than e.g. the best augsburg examples
also their materials and treatment are in some cases lower quality than contemporary armour
the shape being "less complex" is irrelevant. as for the construction itself, its a military helmet. there are plenty of military extant arms that are """crude"""
fully formed sallets included
this too?
but crudeness is synonymous with simplicity :/
for denotation maybe, not connotation at all
no idea
okay lol the answer is also 'no' for several I list its not a ZING when I'm open to variation
I'm suggesting there is evidence for and against both positions, and I am just as welcome to evidence against
we are arguing whether the black sallet was inherently crude
this one is of a higher quality material than the painted one in the Bavarian State Museum e.g.
i can post fully formed sallets that are really crude, doesnt make sallets crude
either way, the guys wearing these are only shown to be cavalrymen
I don't think it's inherently crude :/
I even point out that there is an intrinsic contradiction in the term because it was depicted by prestigious owners
the cost of a horse that can break a lance is still more expensive than their harness head to toe
some soldiers rented ¯_(ツ)_/¯
must be a german thing
Or simply stole the horses from others
all I am arguing is that there are several examples of 'black sallets' where the finish is cruder than those nice polished Helmschid sallets. not that they were inherently cruder. that's what makes the term contraversial and disputable - not all were crude
their finish is the liner they put over it 😏
well thats gone now innit
hey, some helmets lost their polish too...
point taken
oh yeah forgot this monstrosity too
mind sharing it? neva saw said thing
yes
awesome sauce
heres a painted helmet but the design itself looks 17th c. to me
design of the paint i mean
so lots of "authentic" stuff that was later but still historically connected (in this case, a funerary helmet)
yeah interesting
Totally unrelated thing but im wondering how many colors they tinted their harnesses other than like idk, Blued or black
here are some mid 16th to 17th c. stuff
(looking at it again, the paint design looks mid 16th c. actually)
gone
ty
Can i get any word on the authenticity of this type of visor on a bascinet
It seems odd to me
mildly resembles very early visored bascinets but with buhurt slop shaping
What!!!
a fantasy fluted bascinet(?) 1401-1500 Françias 9342
I'm curious if anybody else can find depictions of a fluted bascinet
looks like that one french ms
something like third quarter of the 15thc ripe with all’antica
this is datced c.1510 in the Munich City Museum
the virgin and child are the painted decoration obvs
curators deduced based on documents that Maximilian's full foot combat harness in the KHM from Arbois was painted before 1555 in baked-in gold paint too (was not painted in his lifetime though)
New to this stuff, could you expand on "buhurt slop shaping". Is that referring to lower quality, or the deviations related to different needs from historical combat vs modern buhurt combat?
Referring to the very modern-sport optimized look of it
compared to what they would have looked like in history, for war
a bit like how a gun for competition is gonna be different from a gun for war in a sense
Ahhh, thank you! Appreciate the clarification!
np
Regula Schmid mentions renting armour several times in the 2017 article "The armour of the common soldier
in the late middle ages.
Harnischrödel as sources for the history of urban
martial culture" she has a 1437 swiss list of rented armour as a primary source.
she says she investigates it more in a future publication but she has heaps and I don't know which one she has done it in.
||she also has similar sentiments to me:
"It can be safely assumed that the pieces of armour worn by urban soldiers compelled to fight for their towns were usually objects of mass production. Though their protective function was obvious, they shared only few representative traits with the individually tailored armour of the medieval knight: The Eisenhut or Hube of the average citizen, handed down from the father, or lent out by the widow next door, cannot be a match to a Lorenz Helmschied helmet for emperor Maximilian. And whereas masterworks and experimental armour produced for a noble lord could be of interest to many future generations – as memorial, technical, or esthetical objects –, and therefore found their way to Waffenkammern and modern museums, the ironmongery of the urban soldier was very rarely saved for more than a couple of generations. The metal was eventually worth more than the object worn down by use and old age: the broken armour went back to the smithy where the iron was recycled.29"||
also the possession of horses by German cavalry isnt always entirely clear. several 'Einspännigen' or 'Einrösser' i.e. single-horse cavalry units are noted as being a substitute for actual Gleven. but the primary sources for cavalry mustered by Maximilian always links the possessions of multiple horses to particular wealthy noblemen
we have plenty of extant shitty armors that dont look shitty
like, less than a mm thick breastplates
yeah. also he threatened to sue a guy for posting a review of his book on facebook
fantasy scene
also i dont want to assume that loaned out armor was somehow "the norm"
unless germany, the heart of armor manufactoring, was just a backwater
what the flip
there's no need to assume it was a norm - there is evidence it was a phenomenon among poorer citizen militias in switzerland though
most of germany seems to have been a bit of a backwater for a while into the early modern period tbh
Yes, i found that the MS that it came from is all'antica, ima edit it
? can u be more specific
What is that on his head
hat
judging by the pteryges, vamplates, dots and weird wings i’d say it’s all’antica
Fosh
I agree with this, but id say it kinda looks like a bascinet with a tournament style visor
Portugal
Ordo Teutonicus
this equipment does not fit the period
illustration isn’t great either
I did not pay attention to the descriptions of the period
‘salright
read the pins for a more in depth explanation
love this MS
,curt with the topical 6 image drop as always
thank you for your service
what book is the second pic from
the other pics (except the very last) are from George Jolliot's workshop
going on my list of tomes to acquire.. when.. when i learn new language
it's far from the worst, the artist had an alright idea about how things should look
it's not perfect but it's not telling you anything super wrong like greathelms with late period plate
that was my main gripe
let us trouble ourselves with it no longer, or alternatively discuss it in a thread
oh, yeah that's not good, didn't catch it
Lyon BM MS.439 Apocalypsis figurata
1450s French
Reminding me of those white gowns over armor in the latest DaDG video
They're the same sort
Hoquetons
Interesting
kinda confused on what a hoqueton is exactly, i've seen them sleeveless and like t-shaped but other times they seem to just be something worn under or over armor
maybe i'm just stupid idk
is it just a general term
cool video, not a very good reference
his harness is pretty modern buhurt-ized
french term for coat-over-armor, but when used usually denotes the french-exclusive kind of sleeveless cuts
i see, thanks
i tried for literally like 20 minutes to write something that is easy to understand because i had such a hard time putting it into words
like obviously "scheke" and "livery coat" and "hoqueton" all bear different mental images but im pretty sure the terms would've been interchangeable based on what language you spoke
its just if you say scheke, it's a german term, so you think of the german kind of overcoat yknow

Gun
Are these actually historical? Or just fantasy helms.
historical
part of the thun sketchbook
early 1500s
Bashford Dean is here to help (he was an icthyologist but also got really into armor and particularly helmets in the early 20th century)
while this does look cool and i wish it was accurate this is not a reliable source of information
far too linear
RIP Bashford Dean, called out a century after his death
There's also a very famous (by the standards of a turn of the century icthyologist) picture of him sitting in a megalodon jaw that he put together incorrectly
yeah, it does show real helmets but it treats helmets like a linear process of evolution
instead of many different styles that may or may not be based on others
He was a biologist first for sure
also it shows barbutes as an entirely different type of helmet
which, no, they're big sallets p much
I believe this is from Helmets and Body Armor in Modern Warfare which was pretty much a treatise trying to convince militaries to give their guys helmets and also show that steel armor still worked in the immediate aftermath of WWI.
But it's mostly about helmets because nobody wanted to carry 40 lbs of steel in front of their chest to stop machine gun bullets since the rest of their body would still be vulnerable
nah the issue was that it just didn't work
for gunfire most of the time
and the plate was heavy, and was not consistently effective
steel helmets in ww1 were mostly for shrapnel
yeah the burgonet to zischägge, morion, 'iron hat', and frog mouth are basically all wrong from what is known about them today
the timeline running up the sides is just bleh- flat out wrong. I mean that mainly in regard to the cabasset (shape exised in the 15th century if we're just talking about the 'pear' tip of a war hat which is what the name means) and the burgonet/zischägge for which there is clear evidence in visual art and surviving examples of the use of proto versions in the late 15th-early 16th century, and also the implication in the chart that some helmets stopped being made when they continued to be used almost a full century later e.g. bascinet is obviously wrong at this point
the cuirass here is still very much so inspired byh an effigy of saint George from the 1460s
"This armour is mostly based on the St George sculpture from 1462 in the church in Nördlingen. The back plate and pauldrons was only partially depicted, which made it necessary to look at other sources and blend that with what is depicted to make a functional and plausible piece. On the greaves I put a pin and a buckle instead of two buckles to make the calf smoother and not risking scratching the horse.
For being my first attempt to make a full plate armour I am pretty happy with it. I have good mobility and it does not pinch or bruise me very much. There are a few things I would have liked to do differently if I did it again, but it is what it is.
If you are wondering why I am not wearing full sleeves, it is because the sculpture was depicting short sleeves, and even though it was tempting to go with long ones I wanted to follow the source as much as possible."
Would the besegew push back your jaw?
I LOVE Bashford Dean, especially the armor he made for the US Military
yo i didn’t realize these were the same dude !! somehow !!
nah, its attached to the front of the maille bevor so it’s pretty comfortably there
Ahh ok. So when it is struck, the blow is deflected or is the impact reduced?
impact reduced
the lining and the maille and the plate is a comfortable and probably more breathable alternative to a full plate bevor
And deflection to a degree aswell
it's a "flat" metal disk and shit can "glance"/slide off this easier than on maille where it can get caught in the links
oh yeah i didn’t even consider the difference in catch between the plate and the maille
Also, whats the difference between a great bascinet and a grand bascinet?
none
great is english and grand french
but means the same thing
ah ok
grand sounds fancier
i once had a guy go on a tangent about how posh I was while discussing baguette sandwiches with another french guy in a random server
lol
Too early?
yes
(This guys also love to take any shot they can at buhurt kit, cause they think it looks dumb)
And it kinda does lmao but i love it still
The specific shaping differences so far as i know come down to the fact that buhurt kit is generally bigger and rounder to fit more padding than what a guy of similar size would wear in authentic middle ages times
Buhurt is fun and i have no problem with buhurt gear which looks how it looks for many reasons related to the sport as long as people don't try to pass it for historical
Which makes everyone look like the medieval michilin man
100% historical right here, it happened in history
I should know, i was there
Also everyone in buburt is kinda broke so everyone wears brigs cause theyre cheaper, you never see any fetching breastplates v.v
tbf it is hideous
Well, if you wanna wear skintight armor with no room for padding while a 6’4” 290 pound texan tries to fold you into a pretzel, by my guest. Form follows function, i think theres a certain savage beauty in the way buhurt armor turns out, evolving in a direction suited to safety
Also, these guys are broke lmao, very very very few people shell out for beautiful armor by artisan smiths
yea
it's just silly how people pass it off as "sport" optimization when it's money optimization. people wore tailored armor without padding irl (or at least not nearly as much padding) and were fine
One thing i will level is that a certain type of guy seems to take pride in how shitty and grimey their gear gets
Like dude, at least get the rust off
Well its both
buhurt armor looks the way it does cause they pad it to shit
it would be ten times better if they didn't
People actually not infrequently died or got maimed at tourneys. Nobody can ever actually die at a buhurt show or thats it for the sport pretty much
The one time a guy got seriously maimed, like life threateningly maimed, they changed the rules and named the new strap they make you put on your gear after him
unnecessary deaths or something
pope tried to ban everything bro
and people literally did not care
yea lol
They call it the simon strap afrer simon rorich(?), his helmet came off when a guy was swinging at his head, and the dudes axe sank 3 inches into his skull
jesus
I WANT RANGED WEAPONS BANNED !!!
the very next year, Richard Lionheart and Philippe Augustus building professional crossbowmen corps :
ironic considering richard got shot
yeah lol
the brain surgeon he went to said the guy only survived because he had the thickest skull he had ever seen in his entire career
Still fights! Simon is a champ
some french dude on the wall has this image appear in his mind when he shot richard
hehehe
was it ever mentioned where he got shot? i assume the face
he was prob wearing maille
elsewhere
yea, so generally in the head
neck i find hard to believe unless he wasn't wearing a coif
true..i guess it depends on what he was using, as some xbows weren't enough for maille iirc
maybe a "heavier" one that could go through
Wait what
just checked again apparently it was in his shoulder and it got gangrenous after several days
whee did I read neck
Apparently the guy that took the shot was a cook assistant?
"In his final moments Richard told his knights not to harm the shooter, as he was a mere child. Despite this, when Richard died the knights flayed the boy alive" from a reddit post so idk
tbh too lazy to look deeper into it
yeah I remember he even paid the guy? for some other reason idk
Friend of mine tells a story about a time when the refs called time out because of an equipment failure.
So relatively common strategy is to have some of your guys hang out with their back to the list in one of their arms up on it it. helps them preserve their energy and also tactically makes it much harder to throw them, so they act as anchors for the team that other people play around.
This guy had his hand up on the list like so, and this titanic fucking Ukrainian guy, full body, smashes his bardiche into the guys hand, and every single one of the rivets on his gauntlet fucking exploded off, and it shattered like every single one of his metatarsals in his hand. So the ref called a time out and that guy went to the hospital and the subbed in a backup and went back to it
hell yeah
richard was a baller
So, buhurt Gear definitely is overbuilt because it has to be. Armorers have to play a little bit of a dance, where they have to build gear that is resilient enough to stand up to it and cheap enough that some construction worker in South Carolina can afford to buy it from Ukraine and have it shipped to them. The result is armor, that kind of makes you look like the Michelin Man
if i was richard i would have stopped the bolt like that
seems like he was just a cook assistant if he was a kid
Another part of it is a lot of guys and boo hurt are, to put it gently, Pretty fat.
hehehe
Yes, did some research of the person behind the kit and found this.
pull some matrix shit
There’s one guy on the team I fight with sometimes thats like 5’8” and 280 pounds. Dude can wrastle tho
yea, what irks me is as i said before is that people act like you absolutely need padding, you do for lower quality stuff but i reckon you could do fine if you had a proper repro
robert is the goat
yeah you can definitely wear harness and not look like it barely fits you
they still did wasp waist with even larger dudes, i remember some 16th ct harness for a goliath of a man, he was 6 feet at the least
me when the wasp waist
im just bitter at it because of how much it’s affected the common man’s understanding of medieval warfare
its effects on SOCIETY peeve me 
in practice it’s cool and i don’t mind
la mace is stronger than la sword
it's just annoying when people say shit like "bro maces would kill you in armor without padding" and they get this from, you guessed it, buhurt
when the armor is just worse than real stuff so it needs the padding to keep you from dying
reminds me of this piece of st george
think its supposed to be over a doublet which gives it the "bulbousness" or it's a more clever way of doing that
yeah it brings a lot of misconceptions to the table, lots of “imagine this but x300 and that’s what medieval warfare looked like!” and “imagine just head butting the guy in the duel like that haha”
so now the image of the knight that has been built up across the years where he’s chivalrous and he’s tactical has been turned into this “wow they all fight like cavemen apparently and they’re all bulky as hell”
obviously it’s not “done damage to society” it’s just inconvenienced me in points of discussion and i feel like has fiddled with the image of medieval warfare
i dont really agree. even with as much padding as they have, you have a lot of bruises and breaks and CCT is a huge problem in the sport thats only getting worse. and these armors are made with thicker steel of a higher and more uniform quality than was available in the period, so i think whats more likely is that in those times people just accepted that you get hurt and mayble killed in tourney fights, and of course its obviously accepted that you get maimed and killed in battle
i think its more likely that they just accepted a lot more risk back then than we do now
people sometimes lose their mind when i tell them that if I was a man-at-arms id rather have a sword than a mace
yeah idk...but there are harness fighters who do not get injured or just get bruises like dequitem
he's claimed a few times that you barely feel a lot of the "dangerous" strikes from maces iirc
and dequitem's harness is far from the best, so it puts it into perspective
yeah its crazy how they think the sword is just utterly useless despite it being a lot more versatile than the mace
it's common sense when you think about it. is stabbing the under shoulder going to hurt less than getting hit on your sallet with a club? seems obviously no
I've seen people say that at the invention of maille armor, the sword was useless and obsolete...
"swords were actually merely status symbol !"
kill
murder
destroy, even
its so versatile that in armored fighting of pretty much any format, your not even allowed to do all things its capable of
people forgetting that maces can absolutely be status symbols aswell
i think also that buhurt equipment is built very well to do its job but when it fails it fails hard
buhurt straight up forbids you from grabbing the blade of your own sword for any reason, ever
lol from what i hear it's the exact opposite of what people think
maces were more often status symbols than swords were
no thrusting, for any reason, ever. no striking with the cross for any reason, ever.
i mean maces were and sometimes still are handed out as badges of office, they’re pretty much the most status symbol weapon out there
swords are both, they're great weapons and they look nice
on the topic of weapons being symbols lemme just find a pic i took in paris
maces in certain context are only really good to look pretty
maces seem more dangerous to a guy in flexible armor than a guy in plate armor. it seems they fall out of fashion on the battlefield when plate becomes common as well
i feel like the lack of thrusting especially has damaged the common understanding of in-period armored sword fighting
if you want to explore that you have to turn to people who actually do hema. buhurt isnt that and itll never be that
it's also funny cause like you're much more likely to kill and unarmored man with a mace than an armored one
Its silly
it's BORING
its extremely sensible
ive seen depictions of period tourney weapons that were blunted tips as well
I’d rather watch harnisfechten all day than buhurt
i have explored that personally with my own shoulders and collarbones 
i just wish more people that see it casually were informed “hey, this is sport and not reenactment” like for a lot of people i see arguing in comments
yeah I believe they were used in kolbenturnier?
good ol' king rené tourney book
seems that it's more a rule because they think it's fun though
people at tourneys could absolutely afford the best armor with voiders of plate and such
also iirc you weren’t allowed to stab in in-period buhurt either, as evidenced by the literally perforated breastplates they sometimes used
Honestly im glad half sword is stepping up and is trying to depict blossfechten, harnisfechten and probably much more later
it’s refreshing
and king rene's tourney book with the flat tipped swords
and kolbenturnier bascinets
yuh
kings rene’s tourney book is something I hope half sword references
but I’m pretty sure that book is French so that’s gonna be saved for later maybe
it'd be fun to have kolbenturnier, iirc it was where you tried to knock big crests off of helmets
i frankly dont think people have any real idea of what in period fighting was like at all. Like i dont think normal people literally think about it ever
Walther, Marx: Turnierbuch und Familienchronik - BSB Cgm 1930
(link: https://www.digitale-sammlungen.de/en/view/bsb00038795?page=16,17)
(wicker greatbascinet, targe )
every time ive done fencing in a public place people were interested in a totally ignorant way, not in the 'thats not what i thought itd be like' kind of shock
Was just looking at that sauage crest an hour ago
which explains this
like, "oh you swordfight? like actually fight for real with swords? how?"
in casual discussion with my buddy’s dad and stuff they’re immediately like “YOU SEEN MEDIEVAL MMA !? I CAINT BELIEVE THEY DONE THAT!!”
idk
also from rene's toruney book
that crest tho
need crests eventually
Okay, MMMA is literally the cringest shit ever, that should be abolished and everyone responsible should be drawn and quartered
ill give you that one
lmao
big ass crest with the bretagne hermine...yummy
i wish i could find that one armorial manuscript back dude (it was 14thc however) and depicted coat of arms with greathelm+crests next to it and one of them had literal bunny ears
holy grap
me when I harness my self with an armet+wrapper+crest and kill people
crested armets are peak
14th century dlc now
MMA is cool, i love seeing two roided up naked dudes going ape shit on eachother.
none of that toxic masculinity should touch my beautiful knights though
delicious
ok i found the screenshot i took and sent to a friend but no idea about the ms name
i’ve seen one with black wings oriented in a way that made the helmet look like a batman cowl
Maybe it's from Armorial de Gelre
art imitates life....
bunny knight, where are you
top 5 reasons why I think half sword should make a 14th century dlc
definitely..i wanna look like this
honestly if they ever do that its should be like late to early 15th century
same council as the one that banned jousting
also the same council that banned fighting on holy days
yeah
yuhuh
they stuck all their ridiculous demands in a single council so its ok
another Papal Victory
fun police
ONLY SWORDS and ONLY on weekdays 
ONLY on weekdays
(*doesn't include holy weekdays)
weekdays that arent on the same day as the apocryphal local saint's bday
armor failures are funny
Monte says sliding rivets are bad because at every blow from maces they pop out
ive also seen a video where a guy cracks open a helmet
"Where one plate of armor attaches to another, aside from the rivets, there should also be strong straps, not just the type that are commonly secured with rivets, but the ones that pass through holes to hold the plates together. This binding is flexible, and does not break, and always holds the armor together. Rivets work very differently, for as long as they last they hold strongly, but when we hit them with a warhammer every plate comes apart, which can certainly be seen in combat, for after a few blows the combatants become unarmored in many places. Straps of this sort are more necessary in the pauldrons and gauntlets than anywhere else, for in these places we receive many blows from warhammers."
This reminds me of old Vindictus with its cool breakable armour on player characters
This would be so cool to see in HS
that dude on the left is dripped the fuck out
Positively sopping
This is an interesting read, i remember back before the demo people were asking for breakable armor and other people said armor never breaks and they argued about it
It would pretty cool if you could snag and break certain pieces
You can, very very rarely, pop some of the helmets off
happens a lot in the text, at least for horseback engagements
yeah i would assume that rivets being such a liability would mostly be a mounted concern
in foot combat i doubt it would be a huge issue
with just how complex and detailed the damage model is for willie himself
it would be cool to see damaged variants of the armour sets too, to me. I don't mind the plausibility lol
i dunno about "such" a "liability"
https://www.philamuseum.org/collection/object/306160 Nice sallet.
Has this type of sallet being added into the game yet? I really like how it looks.
pic for those who dont want to click the link 😄
Amazing
there is a very similar one
and another comparable one
safe to say theyve probably got sallets covered lol
Thanks gangster
Peak
God i can’t wait to see german style armour added into the game
Manifesting they will be in the game
Evil bascinet
yeah we're getting the sigismund harness iirc
it would be cool to have some kind of armour destruction
Is this a mural artwork?
It's a tapestry so that might classify as a mural?
I'm not sure that part tbh idk maybe the guy who posted it might kno2
its from a tapestry in the Freiburg Museum
https://onlinesammlung.freiburg.de/de/object/Bildteppich - Passionsteppich--Wandbehang-mit-fünf-Szenen-der-Passion/2EA5D2954B561E69AD7274B92C5A293A?slide=0
the oldest date is 1518 in its provenance for when it was donated by someone but its definitely older.
looking at the landsknecht costumes its probably outside of this game's timeframe probably 1490s but the wicker shoes and apparently hounskull visor on the sallet (or bascinet I dunno, has a pointy skull which might disqualify sallet) on the snip I posted look like they fit roughly into the game's timeframe lol
Bildteppich, Passionsteppich / Wandbehang mit fünf Szenen der Passion
Thank you for the source
whats this weapon?
i guess a one handed warhammer, he's probably driving the spike or "beak" into the guy's head
either a horseman’s pick or just a one handed warhammer like crecy said
Its a tool
the armor dents when hit with maces and such
I’m thinking more being able to actually knock prices off
Oh this is cool i need to pay more attention. Probably too focused on the gore lol
you can knock helmets off
with swords and blunt weapons
(-:
suppose its supposed to be like one of these
remember seeing skalls video on these, very funny weapon
theyre in a talhoffer manuscript too. they sometimes show up in prints/miniatures as pollaxes
destruction de troyes
…
...
Mural from Uppsala Cathedral dating to 1480
Should be noted those murals have undergone severe restoration over the years, so details may be off
i made this in like 30 seconds #poll message
Wait, they actually adding Lorenz Helmschmied's work?
some of it ig
some fake italian coded coat of arms i made for a fantasy world a friend of my was building
personally i like armoria more to make Coat of Arms
I don't think fictional creations really fit the reference channels. Maybe more appropriate for #art-🎨
Since so far only real coat of arms appear on heraldic displays e.g. shields and the flags ingame
Speak of heraldry ... would be nice to see this silly horse ... fits the ingame region (originates from Bavaria or somewhere in south germany)
There are rules and regulations for how heraldry is made and how iy can be used, and it would be ideal to confirm that the in game heraldry doesnt belong to anyone.
But they do belong to real figures
Even arms which dont reappear in the playtest (e.g. the two red shears over white)
Like this appears in the demo pavises; von Giech family
The point is those figures sometimes had children, who also had children, and they might feel protective of their families heraldric insignias 
not sure how that explains nonexistant arms in the game but OK
pretty sure the coas of the french or hre or the english etc etc just didn’t belong to some random knight; prolly to some guy who is close friends with important figures
more coas wouldn’t hurt at all though
yes for sure but is there really a need for kind of cheesy fictional arms ;p
Real arms go hard
Who doesn't want the bucket on their shield
I’d say add more real coas but just keep the most obvious coas to important figures for the adventure mode or something
even then, I think HS will allow you to make your own coat of arms and display those on your surcoat,shield n stuff
Purple bucket over brown field
This is a hand axe thats likely from inbetween 1400-1450
Its intended purpose was likely to be use as a self defence tool for traveling, while also having a pick on the back to help traverse harsh terrain. Its essentially a medieval ice pick, to help mountain travel.
Scale on the bottom is in centimeters
I was arguing for historically plausible arms, as to not get sued for using the coat of arms of some german with too much money
in those cases its better to be safe than sorry
Empirically unlikely .. Czechia or Germany could then sue HS for using their historical arms but that hasnt happened
It just has to happen once. The game isnt out yet. 🫡
as it should be
so so sorry i did not realise i was in the reference channel when i posted
In the 1 in 1 trillion chance this happened they would probably just send a cease and desist lol
red cross sues half sword for having the flag of the republic of genoa in game
forced to make the cross green
damn, real? stupid red cross
🧢
joke
joke
they call him the jester
but didnt the red cross actually sue things over said red cross previously
many a time
it’s why health packs in videogames are green on white or white on red
i would love to have different tournaments with different rules on equipment in the final game
tourneys where stabbing is prohibited and you can wear perforated cuirasses, tourneys where they’re lax and you can spike up your gauntlets

Halo CE had that problem with the international red cross, as red cross on white is a protected symbol to be used in wartime
Manuscript: Amiens BM MS.483 Eracles
Mordhau
where is this picture from
thats what i was thinking but there are the three chads in the center who dont have visor straps or fridgebuild padding
U can't bring a proper harness, it's unsafe
throw tomatoes at him
do this
Tomatoe
really?
Yeah. Real harnesses aren't optimized for the bashing stuff, so tbi, broken neck, and ruined joints galore
As for other reasons, buhurt is really tough on the armor itself
most competitions/events have standards for the armor
Depends on the harness. There are some medieval examples (like the claude de vaudrey type of suit, or some of the english suits) where the changes from the historical design would not be that drastic. And it's not like there is not a decent suit popping out in buhurt waters every now and then, it just is very rare. However there is also the issue of price and timing, where buhurt stuff is much cheaper and needed to be ready much more readily.
I wanna share this video. Showing to the people who cant figure out why their sword bruises instead of cutting
Plaque belt
plaque belt
western european mid to late 1300s
looks like a repro of the black prince's armor
the cloth on the chest is called cote armor
nice i thought it was supposed to be a tabard
the long rerebraces are notably english
tabards are longer and around the time of the crusades and dont tie at the sides usually, nor do they tie as tightly to the armor
european shenanigans, must be
why are u spelling coat like that
or rearbrace
shruggenheimer
dont let me catch u doing it again
the arm harness itself is the vambrace and the shoulder armor is the rearbrace (or espaules/pauldrons/spaulders/guardbrace/etc)
yes
schway
for just the forearm part though its called bracer (at least later on in the 16th century)
so the whole thing is just ridiculous
aye aye ! Ye olde handgonne !
kill thee^
thou art something idk
Wtf sre you talking about
Arm armor is called arm armor
Shoulder armor is called shoulder armor.
Everything else is mental illness
no one was more mentally ill than the medievals. ergo, to be mentally ill is to be historically accurate
Is this historically accurate in any way?
yes
of course. I got very little idea on how it looks like elsewhere :))
Anybody know what these long shoulder cloths are called?
god only knows what an authentic tailor called them but in a modern german clothing dictionary theyre referred to as Hängeärmel. ||not to be confused with so-called trumpet sleeves which also can have a slightly similar appearance in art due to how much fabric they have, or Leerärmel (havent seen them referred to in english but it literally just means empty-sleeves - the ones with slits in the middle for the arms to poke through the rest of the sleeve to hang down - in thousands of late medieval illustrations)||
Does anyone have thw manuscript picture of thosse italian knights with the massive plumes
What’s odd to me is that people wore real harness to battle, not just sporting events
and they were fine. Maybe they were just more okay with injury than we are today, is that true?
without the insane amounts of padding too
there are several
Well if you can drop some here that be great
Tournament-Battle of Louvezerp,
by Antonio Pisano known as Pisanello (pre-1395-ca 1455)
Fresco
Palazzo Ducale, Mantua
1440s
The Battle of San Romano
Paolo Uccello
and there’s another altarpiece that comes to mind that i can’t remember the name of right now
Me and my friends
If anyone needs it, I can post a photo of the costume and armor in more detail
don't speak English very well and I use a translator.
there are photos of white league tournaments in Russia. The White League is a society of gentlemen who develop the youth movement in Russia.
guy on the far right literally is willie
Real combat wasn't just bashing one another. The threat from someone mindlessly wacking is reduced by the threat of someone thrusting them and killing them. Being able to actually fight or march or ride with ease is more important than X% more protection from something that doesn't even matter. Being alive but wounded beats being dead due to exhaustion or being slow. It's why some guys fought with their visor up, and it's why some guys wore fingered gauntlets, despite that the fingers under of which could still be broken. It is probably not done because they think they can tank a thrust to the face, but because they (believe that they) can fight better.
But yes, they didn't care much about TBI's.
@robust tendon
Meant to reply lol
I see, thanks for the info
I had figured it was because of the way modern buhurt is fought vs the techniques in period and in a real battle
It was
True
Plus according to Pietro Monte, less armor is needed in actual battle due to there being less leisure to do what you want (because of needing to defend yourself), and less armor is needed on foot in general. For horseback, fewer lances are used in battle, and its basically the most powerful weapon available to the horseman in terms of force
It had a horse and like less than 4 knights in it
Kinda cartoony in proportions
But the plumes stick out like crazy and are like three times the head size
gorgeous brigandine
Школа ИСБ что-ли?(Зал вроде у Юна мелькал)
it’s a drawing by boris gauda of the guys in the first altarpiece
What did misterpisa say
watch this get misconstrued as "people only wore armour for duels, and it was actually very rare that they'd wear it to battle!"
Saw this often .... usually on the basis that armor is extremely expensive hence it wouldnt appear on the battlefield
yeah it basically already exists with the “most people fought without armor” myth
send the peasants with pitchforks to die in waves!!
A lame claim ....
Thank you
Who made these opium ornaments popular
unfathomably cool
ДА
doesnt matter they dope
Are you planning to model these
ye
Amazing
i used to clown on them but now i lowkey fw em
relatable??
what bold statement!
i require a proof
and an apology for you're false assumption!
Your*
AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH
bowstring is uneven
armor design is typical of AI
why would an archer ever wear this much armor😭
besides this was removed from the art channel before for being ai gen
actually the string got stuck to his chest
...right
So relatable, i relate to the part when i use a bow in full plate armor while wearing a visor
a reverse image search shows this is supposedly by dmitry alexander
who posts ai artwork in the same style, or at least he has before
I can't seem to find the source of the image on his deviant art but each image search goes back to him
yeah actually each and every one of his posts, is in fact ai
the AI frog one goes hard tho, u cant lie
so real
haters keep hating
what bold statement!
i require a proof
and an apology for you're false assumption!
your*
yuroe*
yureo*
Where is this Helm from?
When do you think this was?
the manuscript if french, second half of the 15thC. however the equipement this guy is wearing is somewhat fantastical to play on the "orientalism"
The gear will be sensibly similar if i'm being honest but look up for the Beauchamp Pageant it's prolly the most famous one
ModDB
Browse Dell'Arte Della Guerra (DADG) mod for Mount & Blade II: Bannerlord article direct from modders.
you can also take a peep here
flemish
u dont
theres like 10 that were illuminated in england and only 3 are scanned and theyre in their own shitty museum websites
not pedantic
👎
🫵 🍅
This is just not funny
wtf maximilian the 1st is in the chat with us??
Yes it me
he sucked
Bro wth
that's still maximilian bud
ik you like being contrarian and allat but he's here with us!
Yes it's not kind to speak badly of someone in their presence
Only behind their back (in DMs)
Pot calling kettle
Also Maximilian hated France
thomas shelby mafia sigma
lmao
A fletched javelin
The armor is fakey fake tho
@twin narwhal @fossil gorge use this channel for its intended purpose, no ai or fantasy stuffs
thanks
Historical
use this channel for its intended purpose
Elvis boots
Was thinking about that one
Seems like probably good evidence that shields with big bosses were used in mid 15thc
although I've never actually seen a surviving example
I mean I get its an adoration of the magi and there could naturally be intentionally anachronistic/alla antique elements mixed in, but the whole thing / fouqet's style and the degree of detail seems to imply the equipment was all real
anybody got any detailed info maybe pictures from a book regarding those frontal parts of French sallets? the part over the forehead that looks articulated?
it’s a reinforcement plate
Fouqet literally uses archaisms elsewhere lol
Anyways even if we pretend this artwork should be taken 100% seriously, it'd be like, the only one
. . . hence me saying it could be intentionally anachronistic 👁️ 👁️ 👓
just articulate for comfort sake or something?
probably just an easy way to double the forehead
for the image, could be mistake on the artist's part, or they omitted a bottom rivet, etc. or the armorer was weird
"but the whole thing / fouqet's style and the degree of detail seems to imply the equipment was all real"
i was fighting this claim
i read what you said
interesting 
just a possibility it is a possibility that fouqet's hyperrealism and the fact that none of the equipment or weapons of the soldiers otherwise indicate anachronism could mean the shields are authentic alternatively, could be played up and intentionally anachronistic ¯_(ツ)_/¯
sallet, second half of the 15thC. (Most likely approx. during the Burgundian Wars), found in Savoy
Repro made by Georges Jolliot
i feel like the reason it’s the only anachronism in the image is because it’s so recognizably antiquated that it gets the point across by itself
too late for the game
?
no worries
no worries, we have a lot of relatively productive conversation here so if you just stick around you’ll probably learn a thing or two over time
more burgundian wars stuff in here is always neat, here’s some swiss kit
Always good to see some. Where is this guy coming from?
switzerland 
😮
He's posted a few times on the ArmsAndArmour subreddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/ArmsandArmor/s/1IsPui5yuN
damn i missed this one
Lol im pretty sure the adoration of the magi part sufficiently communicates anachronism
that too
but for anyone who may suspect that there was more than 1 long-gone instance of a magi being adored.. there ya go !!!1!
Extremely hard for being relatively simple. Think the hose is too baggy around the calves though
Or shoes just tight on the ankles
some notable examples of shields with bosses in the pastrana tapestries
really gets the noggin joggin
I dont actually think they were running around like this though seems too absurd
but yeah
those pastrana tapestries huh
Flemish artist attempting to portray adargas
Not "good" source for equipment in the general sense
Good for knowing the "stereotypes" regarding Iberian equipment though, and it holds up well
cope
they clearly portray adargas in numerous instances
theyre clearly different lol
c o p e
the first image on the left has an obvious adarga
and even then the existence of the adargas with the central bosses is proof against the assumption that all depictions of 15th century shields with large bosses = only alla antiqua
also this is how fouquet does his alla antique lol
no bosses
Well I drew this
damn youre really skilled
Thx
?
It's a Flemish artist
Ur the one coping for bossed 15th c. targes lol
Literally all of the images you posted have adargas
But again, it's a Flemish artist, not an Iberian one
The details are scuffed
really cool MS, thanks for sharing
there are also no extants with bosses in the fifteenth century, all the ones around do not have a boss
given how common targes were, you’d think there’d be at least one if they did have a boss from time to time
No way that’s crazy it really was you from the YT comments of that one video I replied to you as
wild
hey thanks for finding
that single image was isolated on this cool austrian art image viewer
https://realonline.imareal.sbg.ac.at/
{:de}Die Bilddatenbank REALonline macht visuelles Kulturerbe aus Österreich und ausgewählten Regionen Mitteleuropas in all seinen Details online verfügbar.{:}
I never said targes lol I said shields
targes are shields
a specific type ya
I wish ONB would have an index of the illustrations with links like the Bodlein does
that reads 1561 to me
targe is a more accurate word in-period iirc
reminds me of ostrich skin boots
interesting, a plackart with no backplate?
or perhaps the "hoqueton" (i hope i'm using that right) is over the backplate and bp but under the front of the plackart?
depends on the specific context
romance speaking has escus
there is a spanish primary source written around 1430-40 that refers to an adarga interchangably as escudo and adarga
im not sure if that would work but its hard to "assemble" it in my head in the first place
its not impossible but i would say its improbable that its a covered breastplate and there is no culet(?)
perhaps maille underneath the hoqueton?
im iffy on that
well it does show up
im confused as to why to be honest
like the practicality?
What is this armor shirt called
the only theory that's plausible (to me) is to cover more men overall by splitting the breastplate and the plackart effectively making one cuirass into protection for two people
Jupon
no
Tabard
also no
or just comfort i suppose
Surcoat
it could also just be a weird artist thing
those are both antiquated at this point and are associated with different mechanisms
catch-all yeah, the name kind of depends on where the MS is from
i think it's just a hoqueton/coat armor
@humble pagoda french MS?
kind of like how italians wear a giornea over the bp but under the plackart
but french (looks to be, anyway)
i've thought before that maybe it's like those studies where bikers who dont wear helmets bike safer than ones who do wear helmets, like it would both protect a man to some degree and give him mobility around the shoulders to an extent that would allow him to defend exposed areas with relative ease
but what's curious to me is how often its seen without any maille directly underneath
it is seen with maille too ofc
which i think is the most likely for that specific depiction
cause he's got leg harness, gorget...
hrnnrgh
you could pair it with a larger shield for a comfortable field kit
the shield would compensate for the lack of a bp
french have term journade
which some interpret as a similar garment
well yeah journade is iirc just the french word for the same thing italians wear
giorneas
ah really
that's cool
yeah exactly
giornea are loose and often dagged or the other word for the kind of decoration where its cut weirdly, also usually fairly long
not very close-fitting like a shirt anywhere but the BP
i would just call it a hoqueton considering its from france but i suppose "coat armor" works for anything as the english go-to
words and their cognates get weird applications in different contexts though. thats what makes names so confusing sometimes :/
and speaking oh hoqueton
Ive seen it get translated into more modern language as aketon which then just gets treated synonymously with gambeson!
like german Wams is also derived from gambeson too which I think just has an etymology meaning belly
aketons are entirely different lol
those are the things sometimes seen worn under maille as an arming garment
yet Ive seen a pro translate hoqueton (from a primary source) as aketon ¯_(ツ)_/¯
not to say its definitive or anything but adds to my personal confusion
when people do things like that lol
